It Begins at Home

Posted on August 16, 2014 by cwny

It is surely not wise for the Church to pander to this idolatry. Even if Christianity were to be the religion only of a select few, it would be none the worse for that. Has it ever been anything else but the religion of a select few, and can it ever be anything else? Christianity is the religion of the White and not the non-White peoples, who debase it even when they accept it. They might pay lip-service to it where the white man is strong and his institutions accordingly respected, or where it has obtained a form of superstitious hold over them. But they can no more accept and comprehend essential Christianity than the white man can accept Shamanism. This, above all, makes it all the more reprehensible that the Church, instead of recognizing this, should swing round viciously upon the white man and hold him to blame for it – that white man upon whose unadulterated identity Christianity exclusively depends.

– Anthony Jacob

__________________________

The print media, which is dwindling fast, and the electronic media throw the word ‘conservative’ around a lot, but they never bother telling their audiences, perhaps because they are completely ahistorical creatures of the present, that the modern ‘conservatives’ are not conservative. A true conservative is in the Burkean tradition: he does not look on his government as a means of eradicating evil from the face of the earth and ushering in a new golden age. The Burkean looks on government as a means to an end, the preservation of a particular people and their particular culture. The government that works for one people might not work for another. And whether a European government works or doesn’t work is determined by how well it protects the people’s Christian faith. A government that works against God’s channels of grace – the familial and racial hearth fires – is not a government for a conservative, Christian people. That it was self-evident the Jacobin government was hostile to the Christian traditions and to the Christian people of France was the central argument in Burke’s case against the Jacobins. It was then and it is now impossible to reconcile a belief in Jacobin democracy, which includes its Russian communist and liberal American offshoots, with traditional, Burkean conservatism. Some modern conservatives will quote Burke while supporting American Jacobinism, but such conservatives are like the man who claimed he loved his wife’s cooking but then threw his food in the trash bin when she wasn’t looking.

Modern conservatives, because they are not Burkean conservatives, generally only argue with their liberal cousins over procedural issues within the confines of liberalism; they do not disagree about the sacredness of democracy. For instance, a small minority of conservatives will protest the government’s refusal to do anything to stop the flow of illegal immigrants, but they will not protest against the legal colorization of a white nation. This is because they believe in a democratic theory of government, and doing illegal things goes against that theory, rather than a conservative government constituted to protect its own people, a people of one race and one faith.

Since the modern conservative is loyal to a theory of democratic government rather than his kith and kin, he seldom does anything that attacks liberalism at its negro-worshipping center. When a modern conservative ventures over the line separating modern liberal conservatism from genuine conservatism, it always causes an uproar among the liberals and the liberal-conservatives. A case in point: the modern conservative columnist Ann Coulter recently wrote a column in which she criticized the evangelical missionary Dr. Kent Brantly for rushing over to Africa to “save” all of the Africans suffering from the hideous Ebola disease, which is almost always fatal. The doctor quickly contracted the disease and had to be transported out of Africa to a hospital in Atlanta. Coulter placed a toe over the line that separates the liberal conservative from the Burkean conservative when she criticized the doctor for going on a self-indulgent ego trip to Arica, while ignoring the work he could have been doing at home. Are there not souls to be saved in the United States? While avoiding the issue of negro worship, Coulter did take a step over the modern conservative line by criticizing the egotism of Dr. Brantly and his failure to practice the type of charity that begins at home. But then an egotist is incapable of loving anyone close to him and can only love abstractions of people who are far away: on such people the egotistic liberals can project their fantasies. They imagine admiring hordes of adoring negroes playing Tom Robinson to their Atticus Finch.

The Atlanta hospital where Dr. Brantly is receiving treatment has assured the public that the doctor’s presence in the hospital’s isolation unit will not endanger the lives of other people in the hospital and surrounding area. I hope that is true, but the hospital’s reassurances remind me of the reassurances of my supervisors on the police force. They told me that I didn’t have to worry about getting AIDs from incidental contact with prisoners who had AIDs. Yet I noticed that they themselves never went near the AIDs-infected prisoners.

Coulter’s mild criticisms of Dr. Brantly were roundly condemned by the liberals, who would have condemned him themselves if he had been an actual Christian missionary condemning abortion or homosexual marriage. And most of the conservative liberals, who share the mad-dog liberals’ love of the noble black savage, condemned Coulter’s criticism of Dr. Brantly as well. Which is what we would expect because it is the religion of the liberal-conservative coalition that is at stake here. Brantly went to Africa as a Moslem goes to Mecca and a Catholic goes to Rome: he went there to worship. If you criticize Brantly, you criticize the faith of the liberals and the modern conservatives. It is a faith that must be challenged and defeated before white people can rise from the ash heap of diversity and become a people with a local habitation and a name. I long for the day that a man can say “the European people,” and everyone that hears those words will visualize white people and white people only, preserving their own people and their cultures in every country throughout Europe.

My desire that European nations and their European colonies should be white and only white is now considered a heresy. Tony Blair’s opinion that Britain “must become multi-cultural,” has become the law throughout the European nations. But it is not a multi-cultural state that Tony Blair liberals are striving for. They are striving for a one-culture state, a Babylonian state devoid of white people. And in order to have that state, white people must be tortured, murdered, and raped out of existence. Is this the vaunted brave new world that liberals have promised us for the last 200 years? Yes, it is.

“Missionaries” like Dr. Brantly must be seen for what they are: they are heretics who have abandoned the Christian God to go whoring after the great negro gods of Liberaldom. Brantly had a ‘people,’ a people who needed to be reminded of who they were and who they still must be: the Christ bearers. Instead, Brantly, like so many other white, negro-worshipping Roman Catholics, Protestant evangelicals, and liberals, betrayed his own people to fulfill his dream of becoming a world-renowned Atticus Finch. Is he simply a little misguided? No, a man who sides with the torturers and murderers of his own people cannot act with good intentions toward any race of people; he can only act according to the dictates of his own exalted egotism.

In the late ‘60s a play called Little Murders was written, and in the 70s it became a movie. The play-movie was a kind of absurdist dark comedy which highlighted the escalating violence in American cities. The play was considered to be “brutally honest,” but it was not brutally honest, because violent crime was depicted as something that had just grown out of control for no understandable reason. It just happened. The rhinoceros in the bedroom, which the author of Little Murders ignored, was the black man. Violent crime did not become out of control in American and European cities until negroes were allowed to roam free in white cities. In seeking to build a utopia where violent crime was non-existent, the liberals turned our cities into places where murder, rape, and mayhem against whites became the norm, and what was considered normal, everyday life became an aberration. Is the negrophile world of the liberal and the modern conservative a paradise that we should work with might and main to perpetuate, or is it a monstrous empire of cruelty that we should destroy? I think we should pursue the later course of action. Can men with any humanity left in them choose any other option?

No white man wants Dr. Brantly or anyone else to contract Ebola, but who is being helped by whites abandoning whites in order to serve the negro? Ostensibly the negro is being served. If that is true, then why is Africa ready to sink into the abyss now that whites have become multi-cultural? Marauding blacks in the American and European cities prey not only on whites but also on themselves like monsters from the deep since whites have become “tolerant” of multi-culturalism. And whites? The new multi-culturalism has destroyed them; they have lost their faith in the Christian God and His people. So no one is being helped by the liberals’ egotistic march to the tom toms of multi-culturalism.

The liberals have spent centuries indoctrinating the white man. He now believes that a universal love of the colored stranger is the purest, finest love on earth. To love one’s own is mere selfishness, a selfishness that marked the European in the bad old days of Christian Europe. A man can only believe such satanic filth when he has no heart. Ah, there’s the rub. Appeal to a man’s pride of intellect and he will abandon his people and his God. Balzac saw the blood red tide upon the horizon: “In Paris to tell a man he has a good heart is the same as telling him he’s stupid as a rhinoceros.” And who wants to be as stupid as a rhinoceros? I do. I want to stay with the third dumb brothers of Christian Europe who slew dragons and defied Satan and his minions, because they loved their own people in imitation of their Lord, who was and is the embodiment of that charity of honor, the mark of the true European.

The new post-Christian morality is manifested in every aspect of the Europeans’ lives. We don’t protect our borders because the stranger is purer and better than our own people. And since the colored alien is better than the white citizens, he is allowed to murder, rape, and steal when he enters his new country. In my own anti-nation called the United States of America (it should be called the United States of Satan) elderly white people, I meet them all the time, cannot afford to pay for their health care unless they increase their incomes by applying for the welfare benefits that the colored aliens receive. But the older whites won’t apply for welfare because they don’t want to be a drain on their nation’s resources. The liberal Jacobins depend on the innate honor of the white people that they have sworn to exterminate. There is no reasoning with such monsters of the deep, who hate their own with the passionate hatred of their satanic master. From out of the depths, the depths of a European heart, we respond to the liberals’ satanic universalism of hate with a love of our own people, the people of our racial hearth fire. And surely that love will teach us to hate where we ought to hate and fight without ceasing against the liberals who hate their own in the name of a universalist theology forged in hell. Our short mortal lives will count for nothing if we don’t practice the charity that begins at home. +

Posted in Halfway-house churches, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Tagged | Comments Off on It Begins at Home

Rights of Memory

Posted on August 9, 2014 by cwny

A fairy tale-esque appreciation of the Christian faith as expounded by our Lord in the Gospels and by St. Paul in his epistles, a charity of honor that comes from that faith, a provincialism that nurtures that faith, and a love for the hero who embodies and champions that faith, are all woven into one exquisitely beautiful tapestry (and I speak of the highest form of beauty, moral beauty) by my European kinsman and hero, Sir Walter Scott. Just as words cannot do justice to Scott’s vision of Christ’s people, the Europeans, there are also no words that can adequately describe the moral separation between our modern Europe and Scott’s Europe. To hate the former and love the latter is essential if we are ever to be worthy of the people and the God championed by Walter Scott. – CWNY

__________

Pirandello once wrote a play called Six Characters in Search of an Author. Such is the plight of the European people. They passed from pagan to Christian and then from Christian to … That is the question: what have the Europeans passed to now that they no longer see the Christian God as the author of their being?

It’s obvious that the mad-dog liberal segment of the European people, the ruling elite, have latched on to the negro as their new Christ figure and they have used the old rites and the old documents of the Christian churches to buttress up their new religion. The liberals’ new faith is not something that can be refuted by reason; their need to worship the negro transcends reason. They view dumb nature as their author, and who but the negro, the most natural creation of dumb nature, should sit upon the throne of nature? The liberals must blot out whiteness so that mankind can return to a state of nature, which translates to a kingdom of the negro and for the negro.

But let us return to the hoi polloi, the grazers, who are neither fish nor fowl. They lack the mad-dog liberals intense love of the negro, but they are all enslaved by some aspect of liberalism, be it science, blood sport, democracy, the sexual revolution, or some other adjunct of the liberals’ new paradisiacal state. The grazers lack an author, a god, so they are at the mercy of the liberals who do have a god. They are like the Hebrew people during their captivity in Egypt, because they are enslaved by a powerful elite who worship heathen gods, but they are also unlike the captive Hebrews, because they are unaware that they are enslaved by a powerful elite that worships heathen gods just as they are unaware of the existence of the true God. Hence the European people remain in a kind of spiritual limbo like Pirandello’s six characters in search of an author.

The satanic essence of liberalism is that it enslaves men and women without their knowing they are enslaved, and it erases the memory of the true God from their hearts, so that they must either wander aimlessly over the desert of modernity searching for God or else embrace the liberals’ god. Resistance to liberalism is almost non-existent, because of the Yeats’ factor, the mad-dog liberals, who are the worst, can do what they like with the best, the wanderers in search of an author, because the wandering grazers have no God.

There are illnesses we get that make us think, if we are young, “this feels like death, but hopefully I’m young and vital enough to survive it.” And when we are older we think, “I hope I can survive this one.” But young or old, when the fever breaks, when we feel health returning, it is a magnificent feeling. Even though we are still much weaker than we were before becoming ill, we feel better than when we were in complete health, because the fever has broken and a body that was beginning to take sickness as its norm now feels that health is its normal state. This is the way a man feels deep down in his soul when he purges the liberal fever from his blood. He is in health again! He’s weak from the battle, but his spirit is now functioning. He knows the author of his being, and he knows who his enemy is: the ancient foe and his liberal minions.

Of course there are those long sicknesses when a man’s body forgets that there ever was something called health. This is the present state of the European’s soul. Deep in his soul he feels that sickness is normal. He thinks to live amidst negroes who are worshipped by the very people they kill and rape with impunity, to live amongst creatures called feminists who slaughter their children in the womb and have female bodies but no femininity, to look on existence as a closed, predetermined biological endgame, is normal living. “This is the life for a man,” is the European’s response to modernity.

Something called the grace of God is needed, but who shall be the conduit for that grace? There are no appeals to God, because God has been found wanting. The utopians have rejected God and gone on to a new life of eternal spiritual sickness that a vast network of demonically inspired sycophants are desperately trying to peddle as health. Our world has been narrowed down to academia; the academic mentality rules the European people. And academia is an exact replica of hell. In those unhallowed halls the abstracted intellects of men and women filled with satanic hatred for all things connected to the Son of God and His people preach the glory of the noble black savage, the wonder and magnificence of feminism, and the triumph of all things bestial, inhumane and blasphemous. When the citadels of academia come tumbling down, the end of liberalism is nigh, but until that day the European people will suffer that sickness unto death, which can only be cured by the forgotten God of the European mists.

August 15th will mark Walter Scott’s birthday. The European world will take no notice of it. Why should we take notice of a dead white man when we have the martyred Martin Luther King Jr. and the sainted Nelson Mandela to honor? We should honor Walter Scott’s birthday because he represented all that was good and pure and noble in the European people. Scott was the poet laureate of spiritual chivalry, the type of chivalry that beareth all things and hopeth all things because it is grounded in charity, that indefinable essence of life that can only be found in the people of the mists, the Europeans who honored and revered the God who took flesh and dwelt by the racial hearth fires of the European people. The villains in Scott’s novels are the Louis XIs of France and the Lord Dalgarnos of Britain, men who intellectualized their souls and made themselves the servants of Satan, the archangel of intellectual pride. Those villains are the minority in Scott’s Europe, and their existence in high places was seen as a tragedy by Scott and his readers. Not so today, the men with the intellectualized souls rule with the assent of an intellectualized peasantry. This has been the great triumph of Satan: there is no spiritual chivalry left in the European people. They have absorbed the intellectualized spirit of the satanic men of intellect who mock and scorn the Man of Sorrows in the derisive spirit of the Roman soldiers of ancient times. Draw the sword and throw the sheath away, because the men with the intellectualized souls are legion and they will not rest until every last vestige of Scott’s Europe, which is His Europe, is blotted from the face of the earth.

Do we have any rights of memory in the European lands? Yes, we, the Europeans that remain faithful to Scott’s Europe, are the only Europeans who have the right to rule in Europe. In fact we must rule, because the men of the intellectualized souls have turned Europe into a third world whorehouse where spiritual syphilis is seen as health and a passionate faith in the European Christ is seen as a fatal illness.

All totalitarian regimes institute universal education, so it should be no surprise to us that the liberals have universalized education beyond the dreams of the totalitarian oligarchies of the past. “Education” has engulfed every aspect of the Europeans’ lives. There is now pre-pre-kindergarten classes so that white children can learn to hate themselves and their past at the earliest age possible. And every aspect of the grazers’ lives, particularly sports, is educational. All the sporting rituals are accompanied by educational lectures against anti-social behavior, which translates to prejudice, which translates to a refusal to worship the colored and hate the white. There are never any violations of the liberals’ code of conduct, because white people have been very carefully educated.

The white man who wishes to remain a white man is an outcast man. What the outcast white man must become is an outlaw. The outcast is a passive creature waiting for the slaughter, while the outlaw strikes back at the world he hates. William Tell and Robin Hood are my favorite of the European outlaws, but the modern white man has no Swiss mountains and no Sherwood Forest from which to launch a counterattack against the liberals. The modern counter-revolutionary is more in the position of Zorro or the Scarecrow of Romney Marsh. He must go amongst the liberals disguised as an educated, non-prejudiced white man, content to passively submit to his own extermination. But inside he is a blazing inferno, a man who hates and loves with all his heart. He will do everything he can to undermine the liberals’ kingdom of hell on earth.

Baptista tells Petrucchio that gaining Katherina’s love is “all in all.” That the white man should love his people enough to hate Liberaldom with all his heart, mind, and soul is also all in all. On the surface the monstrosity we call Liberaldom seems like an invincible super structure with its vast network of communications, monolithic educational system, and its powerful military. But that entire super structure of Liberaldom was built brick by brick by individual souls filled with hatred for Christ and His people. Shouldn’t it then be possible for individuals who love Him and His people to tear down Liberaldom? The European counter-revolution is not manifest at present, but it has begun and it will continue, because there are always a few who see Christ in His people and respond to His divine charity with hearts of fire. At the last trump, at the twinkling of an eye, we shall see the liberals’ kingdom of hell on earth toppled and His eternal European restored. +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Propositional faith, Restoration of European civilization | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Rights of Memory

As the Systems Fail, the Light of Europe Remains

Posted on August 2, 2014 by cwny

Abide with me! Fast falls the Eventide;
The darkness thickens, Lord with me abide
When other helpers fail, and comforts flee,
Help of the helpless, O abide with me!

-Henry Francis Lyte

__________

An old friend of many years standing called me recently to lament the decline of virtually everything decent. My friend is some fifteen years older than I, so she has some memories of a time when common decency still existed on the face of the earth. Some people might say my “friend” is not a friend, since there are several topics that I cannot speak to her about. Perhaps those people are right, but I am fond of Mrs._____, and I admire her for not going with the times and making her peace with debauchery and vileness.

There are two topics I cannot bring up with my friend. One is the Roman Catholic Church’s complicity with the indecency of the times – she must look on the church as the one institution that a person can trust. And the second topic is the negro – she hates what they do, but she would never denounce the ethos of To Kill a Mockingbird. She believes blacks are “basically good, it’s only a few bad ones…”

The other day I discovered a third topic that I could not bring up with the woman who I claim is a friend. She was horrified when I mentioned, with no intent to shock her, that I had no use for the Moslems of Hamas or the Jews of Israel. “But Israel is a democracy,” was her reply. “The wholesale slaughter of civilians is still the wholesale slaughter of civilians no matter if it comes from a so-called democracy or a terrorist organization,” was my reply.

I should have known not to bring up the subject of Israel and democracy, because the same people who weep for Tom Robinson in To Kill a Mockingbird and attend their local Christian fusionist churches are usually Gung ho Israel and Gung ho democracy. Why is this? How did church attendance, negro worship, the support of Israel, and the support of democracy become synonymous with Christianity? It starts with the pagan concept of ‘support your local clergy’ because they are the Illuminati; they and they alone possess the secret wisdom. Over and against the pagan priest-craft system is Chaucer’s humble village priest and Dickens’ real life hero, the Rev. Stephen Roose Hughes, who preached Christ crucified, Christ risen and loved God through their kith and kin.

The negro worshipping heresy, the Christian Jewish heresy, and the democratic heresy all stem from the clerical, speculative heresy that says Christ is the end product of a philosophical system passed on from God through a long chain of great minds; He is not the Man of Sorrows who enters human hearts. Men and women who have been trained to look for their salvation in systems, even if those systems include Christ, will naturally gravitate toward a system about God rather than a faith in the living God. Hence, the blending of negro worship and Christianity, Israel and Christianity, and democracy and Christianity.

There are nuanced differences between the speculative Christian sects. The Roman Catholic favors Israel because Israel is a democracy, while the Evangelical Protestant favors Israel because of his distorted view of what he calls the “Rapture.” Against the Bible he reportedly believes in, and against the traditional faith of the European people, the modern Evangelical religiously holds onto his faith in the unrepentant Jew as mankind’s only hope in an unbelieving world. And both the Roman Catholic and the Evangelical Protestant blend their esoteric systems with the liberals’ worship of the negro. The Roman Catholic fusionist, the Evangelical Protestant fusionist, and the liberal: between the three of them they have destroyed the “unbought grace of life.”

What binds the liberal, the Roman Catholic, and the Evangelical Protestant together (the latter two in a subordinate position to the liberal) is contempt for the Christian faith of the antique Europeans. The liberals say the antique Europeans were racist and sexist, and the fusionist sects agree with them because they do not feel the need to know God through their people. They know God through their theories, so what do they need with ‘a people’? The ongoing slaughter of the Christ-bearing people continues unabated because white people impede the liberals’ negrophile paradise, the Roman Catholics’ multi-racial, multi-religious world, and the rapture of the Evangelical Protestants.

Let’s go back to the days of the Ayatollah Khomeini, when those wild, fun-loving, mad-cap Iranian “students” took the Americans in the embassy hostage. Do you recall the hostages who were released before Reagan negotiated the final release? I certainly do. The Iranians released the black hostages, stating that they had the deepest respect for black people, unlike white European people, who did not respect black people. Of course the Iranians did not have any respect for black people or any other race of people for that matter, but what they correctly surmised from their observations of the West was that liberals were the powers that be in the Western world and liberals worshipped black people. The best way, they reasoned, to gain liberal support was to play on their sympathy for blacks. Unlike those Iranians of yesterday, the Roman Catholic fusionists and the Evangelical Protestants fusionists do share the liberals’ love of the sacred black. But they also, like the Iranian students, make an ostentatious display of their negro worship in the hopes that the liberals’ will allow them the freedom – in the case of the Roman Pontiffs – to kiss the Koran and visit foreign nations and campaign for the abolition “of all boundaries between peoples,” and – in the case of the Evangelical Protestant – to campaign for the continual bombing of all Israel’s enemies in the name of “The Rapture.” What is missing in the various European ideologies is a sense of original sin and a corresponding charity and humility that makes a man feel that, “there are events and circumstances beyond my ken, but in the midst of the battle against principalities and powers, I can muddle through so long as I stay connected to His reign of charity, which exists on earth at my familial and racial hearth fire.” Such quaint notions, if followed, would keep a man close to his racial hearth fire, worshipping God in spirit and in truth while avoiding dreams of rapturous, Christian Zionism, a multi-religious, multi-racial utopia, and a negro-ruled Kingdom of Babylon.

The French Jacobins took what they received in the Catholic Church, a system which explained God instead of a Gospel that showed us God’s face, and spread the new gospel throughout France and the European world. Man as a social being, united to a common social core of kith, kin, and God, disappeared. A new man emerged, who was an abstract entity without a core. He became whatever abstract theory he latched onto. The negro discovered that he had become the white man’s savage god, while the white fusionist Christians tried to live their lives secondhand through the negro, through the Jews, through the Moslems, etc. The Christian blood that once flowed through the European’s heart has congealed. He needs a fairytale revival before he can become, like Pinocchio, a real human being.

Even though many learned theologians have told us there is no such thing as a Christian culture, we know that such a culture once existed. Thousands upon thousands of silken threads reached from the European’s hearth fire to His heavenly throne. It was not the work of a day to cut those threads; it was the work of centuries. Now that all the threads leading us to His kingdom have been severed, what is our hope? Is it the negro? The Jew? Or do we place our hope in democracy? Despair and die is written on all those modern medicines. If those severed threads of the past could be reconnected – and they can be reconnected by hearts of flesh – then the Europe of charity, honor, and faith will be a living reality again, instead of a dead ember.

If you believe as Spengler and the scientific historians believed, that civilizations are biological entities that are born, mature, decay, and die according to the inexorable laws of nature, then you will not have any hope in a European revival. I believe such thinking is called a self-fulfilling prophecy. Believing existence is only determined by biology, the moderns have become mesmerized by the material façade of existence, and they passively submit to what the liberals tell them is inevitable. “White nations must become multi-racial and multi-cultural, whites must give way to the colored hordes, men must give women ‘choice,’ and we must all worship the noble savage.” Why must we do these things? Because we are progressing; somehow we are supposed to believe that perversion and blasphemy are part of the ongoing, biologically predetermined movement toward the light. What light? Light is a Christian word, a word connected to a spiritual realm that the liberals and the fusionists Christians deny. They only believe in what they see with the material eye, which is why they revere the negro man-god and look on the modern Jews as God’s chosen people.

The “conservatives” of the 20th century tried to compete with the modernism of science, psychiatry, democracy, feminism, and negro worship by claiming there was no ultimate conflict between conservative values and modernist values; they claimed the differences were simply over the means to achieve female equality, an integrated society, and a mentally healthy populace. But from a Christian European perspective it is more than a difference about the means to achieve the same ends. All the modern –isms are satanic. Christian Europeans do not deal with Satan. We look to Tell, to Roland, to Arthur, and to Alfred. There is no progression beyond the European hero. He is our exemplar now and always, because he fights and dies for the people of his house and his race in the sight of, and connected to, the Christ, the Son of the Living God. Sweet vale of Christian Europe, so long as we stay with thee, we shall dwell in the House of the Lord forever. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Democracy, Incarnational Christianity, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on As the Systems Fail, the Light of Europe Remains

To Begin Again

Posted on July 26, 2014 by cwny

‘Tis still a dream or else such stuff as madmen
Tongue and brain not; either both or nothing;
Or senseless speaking, or a speaking such
As sense cannot untie. Be what it is,
The action of my life is like it, which
I’ll keep, if but for sympathy.

–Cymbeline

__________

Every once in awhile, about once a month, I check out the television news stations to see what they’re lying about now. What I witnessed on this occasion was a group of conservative-liberals, the Fox News variety, debating a group of Obama-loving liberals. The debaters were focused on the Malaysian airliner tragedy and the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. There wasn’t any real disagreement among the two liberal groups. Both wanted to blame Russia for the bombing and Hamas for the war.  What the liberal debaters differed on was whether The Obama had “done enough.”

It struck me while listening to the liberal blather that the lack of any European Christian presence in the major institutions (church, government, press, academy) of the European nations not only has had a disastrous effect on the European democracies, but also has had a disastrous effect on the non-European nations, because in the absence of a Christian-European ethos the modern world consists of a myriad of competing factions – the Jewish faction, the Moslem faction, the neo-pagan faction, the Christian-fusionist faction, etc. – none of whose members have within them that which makes them act according to His dictates of charity and mercy. When they proceed to make political decisions upon which the fate of nations depends, they make their decisions in a moral vacuum.

Now the liberal and Christian utopians are the first to tell us loudly and clearly that European people once made decisions that stemmed from their Christian faith: “And what was the result? They couldn’t agree on anything, and they fought wars, beat their wives, and enslaved and exploited the colored nations of the world.” But what has been the result of a Europe, of a world, without any Christian European influence? We have seen the big wars, the wars without any charitable license. In fact, we have seen no end to war because daily life in every European nation has become like life in the colored nations, an unremitting war against the light in which “humanity must perforce prey on itself, like monsters from the deep.” We haven’t progressed to utopia since we left Christian Europe, we have descended into hell. “We have no compass to govern us; nor can we know distinctly to what port we steer.”

The Father of all heresy is the abstracted intellect of man, inspired by Satan’s promise, “You shall be as gods.” The French Jacobins added the Son, which was ‘the people,’ and the Holy Ghost, which was science. Karl Marx was not an original; he simply followed the Jacobins’ model that was based on an inversion of the Christian faith. The modern, democracy-crazed European liberals have streamlined the Jacobins’ model. Now the people of color and only the people of color can be the Sons of God.

There has not been any Christian European opposition to the ongoing implementation of what the liberals call a ‘benevolent evolution toward utopia.’ And there has not been any opposition because the European people lost their blood faith in Jesus Christ. The same blood-draining disease that made French Catholics too spiritually anemic to defend their Christian King and Queen also overtook the other European peoples, through their clergymen, and made them incapable of defending their nations against the new religion of the negro man-gods.

Burnet says, that when he was in France, in the year 1683, “the method which carried over the men of the finest parts to Popery was this—they brought themselves to doubt of the whole Christian religion. When that was once done, it seemed a more indifferent thing of what side or form they continued outwardly.” If this was then the ecclesiastical policy of France, it is what they have since but too much reason to repent of. They preferred atheism to a form of religion not agreeable to their ideas. They succeeded in destroying that form; and atheism has succeeded in destroying them. I can readily give credit to Burnet’s story; because I have observed too much of a similar spirit (for a little of it is “much too much”) amongst ourselves. – Burke

This clerical shortcut, in which faith consists of a belief in the intellectual acumen of a few religious experts rather than in the passionate blood faith of a people for their God, rechanneled the Christian faith back into pagan streams and tributaries. Long John Silver found it hard to accept that it was Ben Gunn who did him in: “Ben, Ben… to think as you’ve that done me!” Well might the European everyman say to the hooded men of God, “To think that it was you that robbed me of my Christian faith.”

If the faith is an intellectual system that can be passed on from generation to generation on computer printouts, then the clergy of the various denominations have not “done us wrong”; but if the Christian faith is meant to be passed from hearts of flesh to other hearts of flesh, then the clergymen have done us wrong. If the first way to God, the way of the computer printout, is correct, then there is no need for the European people. Indeed, there is no need for any people at all. We can all exist as one big blob of anti-humanity that lives only to read the printouts given to us by the godded men.

But what if the second way to God is the true pathway to the living God? What if European Christianity, in which the European people responded to Christ’s heart of flesh with the passion of their hearts, is the only accurate vision of the Christian faith that the world possesses? The message of the Bible, the message of the church documents, can only be made clear by those who took the message to heart, because the divine love must have human hearts to dwell in.

The true image of Christ appeared in the antique European culture. Defame and demean that culture with might and main, as the liberals certainly will do and have done, and still that culture will nourish those of us who refuse to let the liberals keep us from our European past. We don’t know any Christ other than the European Christ. He is the Christ that the apostles saw on the way to Emmaus and the Christ who appeared to St. Paul on the road to Damascus. This idea that there can be another Christ hiding somewhere in the civil rights movement, or in Asia, or in the Jewish nation is what is keeping Europeans in line, begging for living space in the satanic kingdom of Babylon.

In Scott’s The Lay of the Last Minstrel, an evil dwarf assumes the outward appearance of a child of Scottish royalty. In that guise the dwarf manages to wreak havoc within the Scottish royal family. Isn’t that what the churchmen have done? They have assumed the outward garments of Christ in order to cloak their anti-Christian hearts. The dwarf is finally recognized because his evil behavior is radically different from the young prince’s behavior. So it is with the Christian clergy: their “loving forgiveness” of black torture-murderers, their love for radical Israel and the unrepentant Jew, and their deep and abiding love of the negro and hatred of the white man all indicate that they are white Christians on the outside, but black-hearted Satanists on the inside.

If we ask why the European people abandoned European Christianity we need look no further than the Grand Inquisitor scene in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. The Inquisitor gave Europeans the means to live and he gave them certain easy-to-follow rules to live by. In return for those gifts the Inquisitor demanded that the European people give up the white moments of existence, those moments of life when a man has the vision, when he sees the living God with a heart that has been enflamed by the divine love which passeth the understanding of the intellect. The living God does not give us utopia, He sends us pain and suffering, but in that ever moaning spiritual battle in the mists our Lord sends us vision, He sends us white moments of the soul. Christianity without white moments is a dry, untenable religion. Its adherents must graft their desiccated Christianity onto other faiths in order for it to survive. But even then they walk as men walk among the dead because pagan faiths cannot sustain men and women who once had dreams and saw visions. The true Faith, the faith that creates white moments, could revive the Europeans, but the modern death-in-life fusionist Christianity will crush the European people under an unbearable weight of superficiality and meaninglessness.

It’s difficult to believe now that liberalism, a synthesis of all the pagan ‘isms’ under the mantle of an inverted Christianity, has conquered the European world, and that Christianity was once triumphant over paganism. The mystery cults fulfilled man’s need for a personal God, but they did not fulfill his heed for a personal God of mercy and love. That need, a desire for a personal God whose love passeth the understanding of the Greek rationalists and the devotees of the ecstatic sects, was what drew the Europeans to Jesus Christ. But if Christ is not the European Christ, the God of charity and mercy who rose again from the dead on the third day, who or what does He become? He becomes a second-rate god who cannot provide the comforts of the pagan gods. The new European goes to the various gods of liberalism for his daily sustenance. The evangelical goes to the Jews and the negroes; the Roman Catholic goes to the Jews, Moslems, and the negro; while the completely secularized European holds onto his negro gods and maintains their divinity against all those who oppose them, which is unfortunately very few people. No one seeks the European Christ, the Christ of white moments, because He has been buried beneath a mountain of Babylonian filth along with the antique Europeans. If some spiritual excavationist could uncover that civilization, the civilization of Christ and His people, there might just be a few Europeans who would leave the darkness of Babylon to pursue the white moments of Christian Europe. And then it will begin all over again, the story that is so ancient and so new. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on To Begin Again

The Cross

Posted on July 19, 2014 by cwny

Men must endure
Their going hence even as their coming hither;
Ripeness is all. Come on.

-from King Lear

__________

While in the midst of untold bloodshed and slaughter, perpetuated by blacks against whites, the white people of the European nations are intensifying their worship of blacks. Why? We go against God and every human instinct in the human heart when we worship the negroes, yet white people continue to worship them. Certainly negro worship represents a return to Baal, but it is also something much worse than mere paganism. White negro worship is a blending, the type of blending that is condemned in The Revelation of St. John, of Christianity and paganism.

A Christ-less Christianity provides a religious energy to negro worship that mere paganism could never equal. For example, I recently saw a four-year old film clip of a young white woman weeping when she learned the news that a particular negro basketball player was leaving her city to play for another city. She wept at the foot of the cross for her savior who was dead. The clip was run in conjunction with recent film of fans welcoming this same negro basketball player’s return to their city. “The King has returned”: he rose from the dead, and came home, where he will sit on the right hand of god the father almighty, to judge the living and the dead for their sins of racism. One news commentator said it outright: “If this story does not stir your heart, you are a racist.” But aren’t all white people racist; haven’t we all sinned against the negro gods? Even white people who don’t think they are racist are really racist, the liberals now tell us, because in fact, “the most dangerous racist is a white who doesn’t even know he is racist”. In lieu of that terrible new finding of the liberal experts, it’s best, when worshipping at the feet of the negro gods, to say that one is truly sorry not only for every overt racist thought and action, but also for the unknown sins of racism. “For these racist sins and the racist sins of my entire life, I am heartily sorry. Please forgive me my sins.” That perverse, blasphemous prayer is the prayer of the new and improved white man.

There are two basic white responses to the atrocities committed by negroes. The mad-dog liberal simply goes on the attack against anyone who opposes the atrocities, because the mad-dog liberal desires the extermination of white people: anything that hurts them is good. And the second response comes in the form of “loving forgiveness” and “they’re not all like that.” Both responses, even though the second one usually comes from someone connected to a Christian church, stink of negro worship, which is blasphemy.

Of course if Christ is not who He said He was, the white man needs a new god, so why shouldn’t it be the negro? “It should and must be the negro,” the liberal tells us, “because he alone is natural, he alone is untainted by the filth of Christian Europe.” There are no “evening lingerings” in the negro’s soul; there is only a merciless thirst for the white man’s blood, which has intensified over the years because of the liberals’ and their “loving-forgiveness” cousins’ constant litany of abuse against the white man. There is no one even remotely connected to any of the traditional powers that be – church, press, state, and academy – in the European nations who will defend the white man’s right to exist in the here and now or defend and champion the white man’s cultural heritage. The white man has been found guilty in the great tribunal of liberalism, and he must, so the liberals tell us, be destroyed.

There is no way back to white Christian Europe through the fusionist Christian churches. If you reject God’s channels of grace, our blood ties to our kith and kin, you will become as sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal. You will perform the biological functions of a human being, but you will have no spiritual life of your own. You will only come alive to serve and worship the negro gods. This is the reason the secular and Church-going liberals cling so tenaciously to the negro. Without him they do not feel alive. They have placed God’s channel of grace, the European’s racial hearth fire, in the realm of “prejudice,” and such a realm is to be avoided in deference to the realm of “enlightenment,” which is the realm of the negro, who is a conduit to Satan.

You can’t hand a negro-worshipper a Bible or a great work of literature from Europe’s Christian era and expect he will turn into a European again. Even if he chose to read the Bible or the great work of literature, he would derive nothing from either, because his heart is closed; he has given it to his satanic abstracted world of Babylon regained.

The liberal and the fusionist Christian don’t react to things of the spirit, because they have moral blinders on. They see only prejudice in European Christianity, and they see only beauty and grace in the worship of the negro. Can such people be converted? We don’t know, but we don’t have to – in fact we must not – worship at their shrine. If every white man bows his knee to the negro gods, there will be no sign of contradiction to Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego speak for the remnant band of Europeans: “… be it known unto thee, O King, that we will not serve thy gods…”

In a world based on statistics and numbers, one man’s refusal or a half dozen men’s refusal to worship the negro gods of the liberals and the fusionist Christians might seem like nothing, but our refusal has eternal significance. He enters this world through charity: if there is no charity of honor, the type of charity that can only be known and fanned into a roaring fire at our racial hearth fire, then He cannot enter this world. So our refusal to worship the negro gods by remaining true to our racial hearth fire, allows the dear Christ to enter into this world by the only pathway He has ever chosen to take – the pathway through the human heart.

Christ told Thomas, “Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed; blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.” Christ was thinking of us when he spoke to Thomas. We would never be blessed to see Him on this earth as the apostles did, but still He came to us. We don’t actually hold His hands and touch His side nor do we lay our head upon His Sacred Heart, as John the beloved did at the Last Supper, but we do see and touch Him through the heart of His people. He abides with us in our European home, the dwelling of our Fathers who rest in the arms of the Lord. The modern Europeans must worship the negroes of Babylon because they have fled from their racial homes to wander in the multi-racial, soulless world created by the demon who prowls the world seeking the ruin of souls. He is their new master, and they hope to remain secure and protected in his care.

I once, because I didn’t want to go to work anesthetized, had a dentist pull my tooth without any anesthetic. It was very stupid of me to go without an anesthetic, because I suffered a great deal of pain for no particular reason; I could have been late for work or taken a day off with no consequences. But there is another type of pain, a necessary pain, that the European flees from which has resulted in the loss of his soul. This is the pain of having deep, heartfelt attachments to our kith and kin. The pangs of dispriz’d love, the pain of watching your loved ones suffer and die, the parent’s sorrow over an ungrateful child, the child’s sorrow at an abusive parent, all this and more is the pain of a mortal man who lives his life within the confines of the racial and familial home that our Lord has provided for us. All the Jacobins’ blather about liberty, fraternity, and equality, the Marxists’ raptures about a workers’ paradise, and the modern liberals’ paean to the sacred negro all amount to one common desire: “I hate existence in this world, so whatever takes me away from reality and furthers my utopian fantasies is good, and whatever brings me close to reality is bad.” Our Lord was crucified because He asked the Jewish leaders to accept the reality of a loving incarnate God rather than an abstract dream of a cruel Jewish state presided over by a malevolent god who would reward them and punish all their enemies. And so it has always been, since Christ left this earth. The liberal, be he Jew or judaized Christian, hates the truth and will punish home when someone defends Christian Europe, because the truth became incarnate in that civilization. Edmund Burke was not hated by the English liberals because he told lies about the French Jacobins, he was hated because he spoke the truth. If the liberals had accepted Burke’s truth, they would have had to give up their utopian fantasies. Likewise the negro-worshipping liberals of our day, secular and churched: Anthony Jacob is not hated because what he says is false, he is hated because what he says is true. If negroes really are not sacred creatures, devoid of original sin, then we must consider that the racist Europeans were essentially right about existence – “This world is a vale of tears, but Christ is Risen. He has redeemed our suffering and conquered the world. Let us take up our cross and follow Him.” What is so terrible about the European vision? Why this vast network of subterfuge, lies, and violence to suppress the vision? It is the cross of Christ: the liberals want no part of it. The sign of our salvation, our common hope, has no place in utopia. But it has the central place in the hearts and homes of the antique, racist Europeans. Never the twain shall meet. We will always be at odds with the liberals who have forsaken the cross of Christ for the negro gods, whom they believe will provide them with a pain-free life of pleasure in the new Babylon.

Right now the utopian faith of the liberals has conquered the European world. But can the worship of the negro, which is the cornerstone of the liberals’ malevolent utopia, be maintained forever? The rigid, draconian measures used to enforce negro worship seem to suggest that even the liberals fear their faith does not rest on solid ground. The counter-revolution begins with the refusal to worship the negro gods. What is essential is that we refuse to bend our knees to Satan and his minions: “… be it known unto thee, O King, that we will not serve thy gods.” +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Christian counter-attack, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on The Cross

Two Separate Worlds

Posted on July 12, 2014 by cwny

In the liberals’ bible there is a Satan just like there is in the Christians’ Bible, but the liberals have a different version of the Genesis story. The liberals claim that the earth was once a wonderful paradise, a self-sustaining paradise, where the rule of nature was the rule of the earth. Everyone in paradise was natural, loving, giving, and non-white. The black man ruled a multi-colored people of red, yellow, black, and brown. Then one day an evil white man appeared in the garden. He cunningly subverted the good and noble black rulers and gained control of paradise. He then brought other white people, who had been hiding in Bogeyland, into paradise and set up a new and unnatural kingdom over the ruins of the black man’s paradisiacal kingdom of nature. No longer could the loving, caring, sharing people of color continue their natural practices of murder, rape, cannibalism, and free unbridled sex. The white bogeyman curtailed those natural practices and introduced an unnatural, heinous religion. The white bogeyman told the wonderful, natural people of color that there was a God above nature who looked on their natural practices as abominations. They were, the white bogeyman insisted, in a state of sin. We know the rest of the story. Despite the fact that the white bogeyman told the people of color that there was a savior who would save them from their sins and the death which was a consequence of sin, the colored people fled from the white bogeyman’s world and created their own purer, more natural worlds where rape, murder, cannibalism, and unbridled sexual license were the norm.

So two separate cultures existed, that of the white bogeymen and that of the natural men and women of color. Then the wonderful thing happened. In the cruel oppressive land of the white bogeymen, a magnificent new type of man emerged, a sport of nature, a mutant. This new man was called The Liberal…       -CWNY

___________________________

In America we have twice elected a negro president of the United States. And every January we have a national holiday to celebrate the life of an infamously immoral and degenerate negro named Martin Luther King Jr. In France, that great land of liberty, equality, and fraternity, the former president, Nicolas Sarkozy, speaking in 2009, said with pride that France was a regicide nation. And in Britain, formerly the mother of the free, now the mother of radical Islam and the Mau Mau, the government pays reparations to the satanic followers of Mau Mau who raped, tortured, and murdered British citizens. All the aforementioned events, which occurred without a whimper of protest from white Europeans, signify just how deeply utopian liberalism has sunk into the soul of the European people.

If the European people were a Christian people, then death would be the price for those who supported negro worship, regicide, and Mau Mau. But since the European people are not a Christian people, there is nothing to prevent negro worship, regicide, and Mau Mau from being supported and lauded. We have supped full of horrors, the most dire deeds of blood perpetrated against white people go unavenged by white Europeans whose ancestors once went into battle to protect His reign of charity. The new cowardly faith came to fruition at the time of the French Revolution:

It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then the dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began to move in,–glittering like the morning-star, full of life, and splendor, and joy. Oh! What a revolution! And what a heart must I have to contemplate without emotion that elevation and that fall! Little did I dream when she added titles of veneration to those of enthusiastic, distant, respectful love, that she could ever be obliged to carry the sharp antidote against disgrace concealed in that bosom; little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fallen upon her in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honour, and of cavaliers. I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. – Burke

The age of chivalry is gone indeed, but how could it be otherwise? When the Christian faith is drained from the blood of the Europeans so are the virtues that go with that faith: courage, honor, and charity. We have only Christian utopians left in the ranks of those who adhere to organized Christianity. They are false Christians who ape the utopianism of the secular liberals like a junior executive apes the big boss in a large corporate network by going around saying, “Yes, J.B.,” to everything Mr. Big says. “Yes, the Europeans were racist; Yes, we must integrate; Yes, we must encourage miscegenation; And Yes, Yes, Yes, we must all love the negro with our whole heart, mind, and soul, and hate the white man and all his works.” Such is the never-ending new and improved “Hallelujah Chorus” of the utopian Christians, whom we can “see everywhere, any time of the day,” unlike the “everyday housewife,” who seems to have gone the way of chivalry and charity, into the dustbin of history.

The French Revolution, the Haitian revolution, and rebellions such as the Mau Mau rebellion of the 1950s all stem from Satan, and they all follow the same predictable pattern:

(1) Liberals from a distance all support the revolution – Price, Kingsley, Shelley, Keats, Byron, etc.

(2) Some liberals, who see the bloodshed first hand, condemn the bloodshed and claim people such as Robespierre, Jean Francois, and Kenyatta have perverted the revolution, but those same liberals never abandon their precious revolutionary ideals. When the Kenyattas and Robespierres pass from the scene, they support the ongoing revolutionary movement toward the light.

(3) The vast majority of whites in France, in Haiti, and in Kenya are not in favor of their own extermination, but their natures are “so far from doing harm that they expect none,” which makes them believe the liberals’ lies that say democracy and diversity do not mean the extermination of white people.

(4) Over time, the bloodbaths are forgotten, and the revolutions, especially the black revolutions, are sanctified and accepted as the model for the whole world. Butchery and savagery are accepted if they are attached to high sounding words such as civil rights, national independence, racial equality, or democracy.

(5) All opposition to the new world order can be squashed because the new world order is based on the new religion of mankind. Heretics must be crushed in the name of the common good.

“All means are justifiable and meritorious with traitors; now that the Jacobin has made his slaughtering canonical, he slays through philanthropy.” – Taine

Taine is precisely correct when he attaches the word ‘canonical’ to the utopians. The French Jacobins and their spiritual descendants, the negro-worshipping Europeans of the modern era, are bloody in their designs and more fervent in the execution of their designs than the worst of the Grand Inquisitors and the worst of the Puritan witch hunters. Christian orthodoxy is heresy and satanic negro worship is orthodoxy in modern utopian Europe. Opposition to liberal orthodoxy is not tolerated, but because of the success of the liberal organs of propaganda the liberals seldom have to deal with opposition. When enough Europeans cease to swallow the liberals’ party line and stop voluntarily offering themselves up for sacrifice, the liberals will have to become more overtly bloody and violent. This will be a step up, because it will be a sign that the silent slaughter has become a battle. God cannot defend the right if the right refuse to fight.

Most men, when pushed to a wall, will fight. But the modern European man does not feel that he has been pushed to the wall. He sees that other whites have been pushed to the wall and crushed, but he thinks that will never happen to him because he is not racist; he is a firm believer in democracy, which (he believes) stands for freedom, equality, and diversity. And since he is a rational man, he does not listen to the naysayers, the underground men who tell him that freedom, equality, and diversity mean only one thing – the death of everything white and Christian.

A man living on the mathematical surface of life cannot see the heights or the depths. But the Europeans must start to look to the heights and see what their honored dead saw in their lifetimes, or else they will be pulled down to the hellish world of the liberals where the absence of light will make them forget there ever was an overworld of light. It’s not a case of “we must act now or it will be too late.” It’s already too late if we judge success by elections and eleventh hour political movements. Such movements are only on the mathematical surface of life. In the spiritual realm, it is never too late. The liberals were and are committed to building utopia over the dead bodies and dead culture of the white Europeans. When the Europeans break away from the mathematical endgame of utopianism and start to love and hate with all their heart, they will finally begin to fight back, and such a fight, the fight for God, race, and hearth, is what we were born for.

In a movie called The Music Man (1962), there is a wonderful scene near the beginning of the film in which a con man tries to create a need in a small turn-of-the-century Iowa town for a boys’ band. Of course the con man plans to sell the band instruments and uniforms to the townspeople. In order to sell the townspeople on the band, he has to convince them the town is in “trouble.” He is told, “River City doesn’t have any trouble.” But that doesn’t deter the con man; he very cleverly creates trouble, by informing the townspeople of the dangers of a pool table in their town, which is so evil that there is only one surefire remedy: a boys’ band.

What Professor Harold Hill does is what all advertising men do: they create a need where there was no need before in order to sell what they want to sell in order to enrich themselves. The liberals first destroyed the Christian God with philosophical speculation, thus creating a need for a new god. Then they supplied the new god: first it was the “working class people,” and then “the people” became the colored people of the world with the negro at the top of the heap, and the working class whites were cast into outer darkness with the middle and upper class whites. In fact, the working class whites usually are the first to suffer the effects of the worldwide Mau Mau revolution as they cannot afford to retreat to non-occupied territories; they must stand and die where they live. Bereft of their racial hearth fire, they live and die without ever knowing what it means to be connected to the living God through one’s people.

It didn’t happen overnight, this liberal distilling process, but gradually, over time, the white man has been drained of his heart’s blood. Liberal theorists tell him that he doesn’t need his heart’s blood; his mind will serve him just fine. But will it? Has it? No, it hasn’t. The white man became hopelessly lost in a maze of philosophical speculation. Having abandoned his own people for an abstract people, he now can only experience life second-hand through the negro. So long as white men worship negroes they will be mere shadows with no real existence.

A friend who detested French cooking once described it to me as a process whereby the French drain all flavor out of their food in order to put their own flavored sauces into the food. I’ve never really tasted French cuisine, so I can’t speak to the truth of my friend’s assertion, but I can attest to that alleged process of French cooking as it pertains to white Christians. The liberals drained all the Christian blood from them in order to leave them with only the ideals the liberals forced into their pygmy brains. Chivalry, faith, honor, charity, the love of kith and kin, and the love of God are virtues that come from the heart and the blood of a man. When there is no heart and blood, there are no Christian virtues, only liberal ‘virtues.’ And what are the ‘virtues’ of the liberals? Pride of intellect, and a loving, worshipful adulation of the negro as the one true man-god.

The fight against the liberal ‘virtues’ and the fight for the virtues of the heart and the blood, the virtues of our honored dead, constitutes the only true happiness in this world. The romance of Christian Europe is not over. Since life, at least the white man’s life, is ultimately of the spirit, the eternal romance of Christian Europe will continue to inspire men of blood who will conquer the desolate, barren wastes of the liberals’ mind-forged utopia. +

Posted in Charity, Faithfulness, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on Two Separate Worlds

Charity and Mercy Have One Name and It Is Not Mau Mau

Posted on July 5, 2014 by cwny

Kenya, we must understand, is a microcosm of the entire West. Therefore let us ask ourselves, What would have been our general White position today if the world had consisted only of Kenya, with no other place for us to go to and no other form of government for us to live under? What then? We, the White race, would already have been obliterated or reduced to everlasting serfdom, would we not? Yet however fanciful it might still seem to the white peoples of the northern American states and occupied Europe, the world today does in the most vital sense consist only of Kenya, for we cannot keep on being racially overruled and uprooted and moved on. Wherever we are now we are in effect in Kenya; for certainly the operations of the anti-White conspiracies, the techniques of the Communists, Liberals and One-Worlders, remain significantly identical whether they be applied in Kenya or Alabama. – Anthony Jacob

__________

A British court recently awarded damages to Mau Mau supporters who had “suffered” at the hands of the British during the bloody Mau Mau reign of terror in Kenya during the 1950s. This is like awarding damages to the wolf because the lamb he was rending to pieces managed to leave a hoof mark on the wolf’s face before being devoured. But this is the inverted, perverted society of anti-Europe that we live in: the black wolves are venerated, and the white lambs are slaughtered (see “Bottomless Pit of Diversity”).

Anthony Jacob describes the Mau Mau uprising in his book White Man Think Again!:

Even the wild animals in the bush recognized and accepted the Mau Mau terrorists as fellow-animals, which they never did where the white troops were concerned. Mau Mau was something in the African blood, calling imperatively and irresistibly. It was a revolt of savagery against all things sane and Christian and civilized and White:”

And one of the leaders of the Mau Maus, the satanic Keynatta, was wined and dined by the European liberals. To say Kenyatta was a murderer and rapist would be an injustice to your average run-of-the-mill murderer and rapist. Kenyatta never murdered without torture, and he never raped without torturing and humiliating his victims first. Such was the mark of the now sainted Mau Maus, and such is the mark of the black man when left to his own devices. Behold the noble savage!

I was told by a friend who had met Anthony Jacob that Jacob had many white friends who had advised him not to publish White Man Think Again! because it would anger the liberals in South Africa and throughout the West. His friends didn’t dispute the truth of what he said; they just didn’t want it stated for fear of the liberals. But Anthony Jacob was in line with Shakespeare, Burke, and Scott: his tongue had to utter the truths of his heart. Anthony Jacob was the last of the Goths, a man who loved and hated with all his heart. He loved his people and hated the satanic civilization of liberals and black barbarians that were arrayed against his people. Everything Jacob foretold has come true. Kenya has become the world. Satanic, black Mau Maus kill and torture whites throughout the European world while the liberals provide the ideological support for them, representing them as misunderstood freedom fighters and/or sainted Christians who must be curried and pampered. Kenyatta himself told the BBC he was a Christian, and the BBC, those staunch proponents of an adversarial press when they are interviewing white Britons, let him get away with his lies. The liberals’ work continues into the 21st century. Black savages know they can get special privileges from the fake Christians on The 700 Club and other such organizations, if they just say they are Christian; there is no other requirement needed to qualify for sainted status in the eyes of the utopian Christians. It doesn’t matter how anti-white and anti-Christian the black savage is, as long as he says he is Christian and refrains from bringing his blood-soaked knife to the T.V. studio, he will be presented as a modern day saint, deserving of all homage, praise, and money.

There is nothing of what David Balfour called “the good Christianity” in self-professed Christian groups that seek to blend negro worship and Christianity. They have lost the zeal for truth and the love of kith and kin that accompany the good Christianity. And with that loss of faith has come an inability to distinguish good from evil. Satan seeks to ape God in everything he does. Just as Christ became incarnate in an entire people, the European people, so does Satan seek to become incarnate in the European people. The Mau Maus of Kenya were the purest manifestation of Satanism that ever existed on this earth. They did not have to play at devil worship in black masses and such, they simply let their instincts, unfettered by white influence, take over and lead them to Satanic actions that defied the imaginations of even the most hardened sinners of the European world. By wedding the sub-human Africans, whose instincts draw them to the religion of Mau Mau, with the European people, Satan has seen the glory of the coming of his lord, who is none other than Satan. His self-love is gratified by the incarnation of Satan in the European countries, through negro worship.

The modern Europeans within and outside the church are hostile to the fairy tale elements of the Christian faith, such as the belief in original sin and the divinity of Christ. But doesn’t the incarnation of an evil beyond human comprehension, namely the incarnation of Mau Mau negroism in Western civilization, indicate a depth to evil that can only be explained by reference to the now discarded belief in original sin, Satan, and the Savior who redeems us from original sin and protects us from Satan? If pure evil has a name, does not pure good? I am not a mystic, but at the moment we realize there is a devil — and he is all around us in negro-worshipping Europe – we also hear another voice and see a different face than Satan’s. “I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.” Our incarnate Lord: why doesn’t He come to us? He already has. He is waiting for us at our racial hearth fire, which the Europeans abandoned when they went whoring after the negro gods of liberal universalism.

The spirit motivates the flesh for good or evil. We seem to be facing a spiritual crisis much like the crisis in the pre-flood days of Noah when demons slept with the daughters of men because they saw that they were fair. I’m not suggesting that the negroes are demons – that’s more than I know. But I do know, because I see what they do, that they are a race completely unlike the white race, so unlike whites that they seem to be a different species entirely, a race unable to comprehend the tenets of a higher faith, which teaches charity and mercy rather than the bestiality and savagery of Mau Mau.

Conservatives have written volumes about the dumbing down of our children. But unfortunately they are only talking about declining scores on math and English achievement tests. The real tragedy of the European people has been and continues to be the deterioration of their spiritual nerve endings. They have been desensitized to things of the spirit. How else can we explain this unholy zeal to mate with and worship the negro? This deification of the Mau Mau, this unholy trinity of Satan, the negro, and the liberal should be opposed by the European Christian with all his heart, mind, and soul. If a man says he is a Christian but will not fight against the unholy trinity, he is neither a Christian nor a European: he is one of Satan’s own.

In the old Westerns, the hero is generally misunderstood by the townspeople he is determined to help. Because he wears a gun and seems to be good with it, the townspeople think he is just like the villains who are good with a gun and use it for their evil purposes. But the hero never explains himself. When the beautiful lady, who is drawn to the hero but cannot abide his violent ways, asks him why he must kill the villains, the hero always says, “If you don’t know, I can’t tell you.”

The hero has wise blood; he knows he can’t wrap up the vision of his heart, which tells him that evil must be fought and cannot be ‘dialogued’ away, and hand that vision to the beautiful lady and the peace-loving townspeople. So the hero acts, and some of the townspeople understand once they see the charity of honor embodied, and some turn on the hero and try to do him in through all the bureaucratic devices of the craven men. The lady? If she is a true lady, she finally understands the difference between a Christian hero, a villain, and a craven.

I was raised by liberal parents who sent me to liberal schools. But my education did not take. Something pulled me back. I have often pondered what that something was. It was the European thing. I couldn’t get away from the fact of the moral beauty that was at the heart of the European people. And like the Western hero, I do not know what to say to a person who does not see the moral beauty of the antique Europeans. Do they really prefer negro worship to the God of old Europe? It seems to be that way. Just as I can’t see anything but satanic night in their world, the liberals and the new age Christians do not see moral beauty in the people of old Europe. They see only racism and a people who failed to build utopia. Last week we mentioned the one bold Christian who entered the Vizier’s palace all alone. But was he alone? Only to those looking on from the outside – “I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.” Therein lies the key to the desertion of the new age Christians from Christ to Mau Mau. When they left their racial hearth fire, they lost their vision of the living God who comes to us thorough our racial hearth fire. Without that sustaining vision they felt alone in the universe and sought to assuage their aloneness by blending an abstract Christ with the Mau Mau negro gods of the liberals. Will they be forgiven their blasphemy? Will they repent and return to Christian Europe? Obviously, that’s not something anyone can know. But we do know, with an inner certainty much greater than our certainty about the turning of the earth, that the negro religion of Mau Mau is from Satan, and the antique Europeans, the “racists,” knew the only answer to the liberals and their religion of bestial, blasphemous negro worship: We have only our witness to an ineffable, incomparable moral beauty that exists in the heart of the people who knew the name of the God of charity and mercy. He is not called Mau Mau. He is called Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on Charity and Mercy Have One Name and It Is Not Mau Mau

In Defiance of Augury

Posted on June 28, 2014 by cwny

The utopian liberal (a redundancy because all liberals are utopians) builds his castle with the bricks and mortar of unreality. He lives in mortal fear of losing even one brick from his castle of unreality, so he employs masons to keep the castle strong and guards to protect the masons. And the keystone of the liberals’ castle of unreality is the sacred negro. If that brick is removed, the whole castle will come tumbling down…

A liberal kills all the divine longings in his heart so he can propound the abstract principles of his utopian brain. And with the circular logic of the madman, he always comes back to his own mind as the only reality. He will always find the imperfections of the King he hates and the culture he hates, because there is no perfect King and no perfect culture. But why does the liberal focus on the mote in Louis the XVI’s eye and ignore the log in the Jacobins’ collective eye? Why were the white South Africans condemned for compassionate apartheid and the modern negro rulers not condemned for the bloody massacre of whites and blacks? Why does Tony Blair tell us we must have a racially diverse Britain when racially diverse Britain is diametrically opposed to everything good and decent that used to exist in non-diverse, racially segregated Britain? The answer to all those questions is that the utopian liberal is criminally insane. Devoid of all humanity he uses his brain to support the inhumanity of liberalism, which holds the negro aloft as the holy God of Liberaldom. Is such a faith madness? Indeed it is. The negro worshipping liberal and the Jacobin are spiritually united. –CWNY

___________

I don’t question the statistics of the ‘death of the West’ crowd, but I do question their interpretation of the statistics. According to the statisticians we have only – because we are outnumbered 1,000,000 to 1 – enough time left to take one last bite of our cheeseburger and one last sip from our beer before we are swept away in a tidal wave of color. My first reaction to such statistical prospects of doom is – what difference does it make whether the white man is outnumbered 100,000 to 1, as he was when he conquered the world, or whether he is outnumbered 1,000,000 to 1 now, when he is at the bottom of the world’s totem pole? Surely you don’t think that the extra numbers arrayed against him at present have brought about his demise? No, of course you don’t. So we must look elsewhere, not to sheer numbers, when we look for a reason for the death of the white man. A Martian recently arrived from Mars, given a week’s access to a public library, could discover the reason for the demise of the white man: he once believed that Christ was the Son of God, and now he no longer believes that Christ is the Son of God.

My second reaction is the same as Hamlet’s reaction to Horatio’s well-intended cautionary advice:

Not a whit, we defy Augury; there’s a special providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it be now, ’tis not to come: if it be not now, yet it will come; the readiness is all, since no man ha’s aught of what he leaves. What is’t to leave betimes?

If God gave us a racial hearth fire in order that we might come to know Him through the people of our own race, then we must defend that hearth and those people, even if we are outnumbered 100,000,000 to 1. Since we all die, the only tragedy is dishonor, which is the way of the liberal, who betrays his race and his God. “Breathes there the man, with soul so dead…” Yes, he is called a liberal, but the true European stays by his racial hearth fire, just as Ratty stayed with his river. His affirmation bears repeating:

`I beg your pardon,’ said the Mole, pulling himself together with an effort. `You must think me very rude; but all this is so new to me. So–this–is–a–River!’

`THE River,’ corrected the Rat.

`And you really live by the river? What a jolly life!’

`By it and with it and on it and in it,’ said the Rat. `It’s brother and sister to me, and aunts, and company, and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It’s my world, and I don’t want any other. What it hasn’t got is not worth having, and what it doesn’t know is not worth knowing.

The numbers game is self-defeating. The Europeans must defend themselves no matter what the odds against them. They cannot wait until they ‘win more people over’ to their side or try to ‘negotiate’ with the colored heathen. They must fight. And contrary to the belief of the democracy boys, the Europeans need to reduce their numbers, not increase them. It is far better to go into battle with men committed to the cause with their whole heart, mind, and soul than to go into battle with traitors in the ranks. Keep the liberals in front of us at all times and leave the grazers at home. They will not be of any use to us, because they haven’t enough spirit to fight for God, Harry, and St. George. This waiting for the grazers to “wake up” is the white conservatives’ version of Waiting for Godot. Just as Godot never comes, the grazers never wake up. “Don’t we try to convert the grazers?” No, we don’t, at least not in the form of any rational apologetics. The grazers who can be converted will be converted when they see the Christian faith embodied in a fighting remnant of Europeans. But no grazer will see the light if the remnant band refuses to fight until they have more grazers on their side. That was and is the great error of the democratic nationalists. They look at how many hits they get on YouTube and dream of reversing the colored tide by getting “the message out” to uninformed white people. The sons of Mary, the remnant band of Europeans who have knelt at the foot of the Cross see something that the statistics-minded democratic nationalists do not see. They see that the destruction of innocence, the murder of their people, and institutionalized blasphemy in the form of negro worship is from Satan. And Satan will not be defeated by democratic pragmatism. He will be defeated by hearts of fire, by men who love their people in and through the European Christ, the God whose love surpasseth the understanding of the colored heathen and whose charity and mercy sustained old Europe, and who will, if we call on Him by name, sustain the Europeans in their battle against the liberals and the hordes of color. Nothing puts iron in a man’s backbone and fire in his heart like the knowledge that he fights for His reign of charity and mercy.

I’ve been told ad nauseam that fairy tales are for children, that we need ‘realistic,’ managerial planning if we want to save the white man. But it is the managerial mentality that has destroyed the white man. The tragedy of Western civilization is the tragedy of the sons of Martha run aground.

Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house. And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus’ feet, and heard his word. But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him, and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? bid her therefore that she help me. And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things: But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her. – Luke 10: 38-42

The sons of Martha are the church men prior to the French Revolution who were more concerned with gaining numerical superiority over their Protestant competitors than with the content of their parishioners’ faith; they are the modern day, white nationalists who invoke democracy and intelligence tests in their on-going war against the liberals but never invoke Christian Europe; and they are the modern clergy who have jettisoned European Christianity and its adherents for a fusion of liberalism and heathenism, supported by a numerically superior black and brown congregation. The sleeping beauty in the fairy tale can only be awakened by a hero brave enough to fight his way through the thorns and briars surrounding her and passionate enough to love and appreciate the beauty of the princess. The moral beauty of Christian Europe should stir the heart of every European with a shred of European blood left in him. And if there are no heroes of romance left who want to release the sleeping beauty? Then –

’Twas the hour when rites unholy
Call’d each Paynim voice to prayer,
And the star that faded slowly,
Left to dews the freshen’d air.

Day his sultry fires had wasted,
Calm and cool the moonbeams shone;
To the Vizier’s lofty palace
One bold Christian came alone.

There are no laws in Liberaldom that bind a Christian European. When the law becomes an instrument for Satan, the only law left is the inner law, the law of charity. No European with a heart that still lives can countenance what the liberals countenance and encourage: the murder and torture of white men, women, and children, the murder of infants of every race and sex by legalized abortion, and the complete dismantling of white Christian Europe in favor of negro-worshipping liberalism. Aslan is not a tame lion, and those who love Him are not meek adherents of a liberal-based democracy or mild practitioners of non-violence. Whatever it takes! That charity of honor is what makes the European a European. Surely if we are true to that instinct, we will not remain the slaves of liberals and the sacrificial victims of colored barbarians.

The liberal says the antique Europeans were racist, sexist, and homophobic; therefore, their culture must be demonized and their descendants must be exterminated. The New Age Christian says the antique Europeans were insufficiently Christian because they were racist and sexist; therefore, he, the new, perfect Christian, will consent to the extermination of white people. The democratic white nationalist damns the antique Europeans because they practiced Christianity, which he believes is a managerially flawed system that caused the white Europeans to commit suicide. He looks to a new world, devoid of Christians, but presided over by intelligent white people who know how to manage things. The common denominator in every group mentioned is a hatred of the Christian faith of the antique Europeans and a hatred for, in the case of the liberals and the New Age Christians, all white people, and, in the case of the democratic nationalists, a hatred for every white person who adheres to the ancient faith of the European people.

All three groups converge on that central point, the antique Europeans. Their sins, alleged and real, are always placed before our eyes. But does anyone see past the lie? There was a spirit animating the much-maligned Europeans of old. And it was not a demon spirit, it was Christ, the son of the living God. No such spirit animates our modern culture. It is Satan, the demon spirit, and Satan alone who manages every aspect of our utopian dystopia.

I have no faith in any managerial system that promises me relief from satanic liberalism by an injection of more liberalism. What I do have faith in is the power of the one true fairy tale to set European hearts aflame. Such hearts, though few in number, will be enough. When we stay close to our European hearth fires, miracles occur. Christ didn’t convince us of His divinity through a Socratic dialogue. He climbed Mount Calvary and set us an example of love and charity that drew the noble souls, the hearts of flesh, to His Sacred Heart. The Europeans of the old racist days saw with blinding sight because they followed in His train. If we do likewise, ignoring the caustic wit of the liberals and the massive numbers of the barbarian hordes of color, we will enter the European realm of fairy tales and storybooks. And then? We will be Europeans again, and we will no longer allow blaspheming liberals and savage coloreds to pollute our homeland. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Europeans and Christ, Fairy tale mode of understanding, Grazers, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on In Defiance of Augury

Our European Hearth

Posted on June 21, 2014 by cwny

A stable place sufficed
The Lord God almighty,
Incarnate, Jesus Christ

-Christina Rossetti

__________

The Rev. Blagdon-Gamlen was in the minority amount his fellow clergymen when he spoke out against the colorization of England in the early 1960s. Nowadays he would be a minority of one, and he would most probably be jailed or executed for his sentiments:

Prevention is better than cure. We do not want a Congo situation in this country, Mau-Mau, and witchcraft, signs of the latter not being already lacking. I think that many of us in this country are changing from animosity to sympathy with the government of South Africa.

Christ died for all, black, white, and yellow, and we must love them as individuals, but that does not mean that there must be intermarriage, or, to quote the words of Mr Charles Royle, Labour M.P., Salford West, in the Immigration Debates, ‘I say that world peace will not be assured until everybody in the world is coffee coloured. We may be getting somewhere when that happens.’ Am I a Fascist because I think those words, if correctly reported, terrible, and that the Will of God is that He made some white, and some black, and that He meant it that way, and not willed a coffee-coloured humanity?

What has happened in the European nations to make such sane, Christian sentiments as those expressed by Rev. Blagdon-Gamlen an anathema to the ruling elites in both church and state? The satanic revolt has come to fruition; that is what has happened. Satan strikes back at God by effacing His image in man. But it is only the European man that Satan is interested in destroying. The colored tribesmen have always belonged to Satan, except when the much-maligned whites have snatched a few colored souls from Satan’s grasp, so he attacks God by effacing His image in the European people. It seems as though he has succeeded, but if I still see the face of Jesus Christ in the culture of the antique Europeans then there must be others who see that sacred image as well.

Our Lord prefers a few over many when His people go into battle against the heathen. Gideon was told to cut his army down to a chosen few before he led them into battle against the Midianites. We few, we Christian Europeans, should cut our numbers as well, because “Christians” of the new age are on the side of the liberals. It doesn’t matter whether it is a Roman Catholic clergyman who views the Church documents as interpreted by the Pope as God’s truth, or whether it is a Protestant clergyman who views the Bible as interpreted by him as God’s truth. Both men view reason, unconnected to the source of all true wisdom, the human heart, as the final arbiter of revelation. ‘Tis not so, ‘tis not so. The reality of our history as a people and our own personal histories tell us something quite different. No human mind, no matter how great, has ever comprehended God. But millions upon millions of European people with hearts of flesh have known the living God. The wizard ‘Reason’ and his twin brother ‘Science’ have lured the Europeans away from the living God, the God of the hearth fire who comes into our hearts through our love of our kith and kin. The wizards have led the Europeans to the African jungle where the dark gods dwell. The liberals progressed to the negro gods by the usual pathway to Satan, by the path of intellectual pride. We know the litany: ‘Primitive man believed that God was lightning and thunder because he was very superstitious. Then came ethical man, the Christian, who invented an anthropomorphic God who was kind and gentler than the gods of the primitive man.’ Then came science and rationalism. They were to be man’s final gods.(1) But they couldn’t sustain mankind, so the liberals, without abandoning reason and science, added a personal god to their impersonal duo of science and abstract reason. Enter the negro, and all was right. The negro, buttressed up by reason and science, has become the focal point of the liberals’ hatred for the light of Christian Europe and their love of Satan’s kingdom of darkness.

It is not only the secular utopians who are possessed by the spirit of Robespierre, the ardent opponent of capital punishment who killed thousands in the name of “the people,” it is also the Christian utopians such as John Paul II and Francis Schaeffer, who are possessed with a demonic utopian spirit. In order to build their perfect Christian world, they were willing to jettison the European people. But how can we live if we contemn our origins, the people who taught us to love and cherish the living God? And what type of intellectualized monster calmly stands by while his own people are slaughtered in the name of an abstract god who shares center stage with the abstract negro gods? Certainly not a Christian European. Don’t be deceived by the fancy dress up parties of the John Paul II’s and the scripture-quoting evangelicals such as Francis Schaeffer (“The devil can quote scripture to his purpose”). They, like their spiritual counterpart, the devilish Robespierre, are so taken up with their theories about God that they have totally forgotten His nature. He is a God who imparts to human hearts. If you damn all those people who have a heartfelt connection to their own race and their own familial hearth fire as racists outside the ken of humanity, then you have effectively cut not only the European people off from God, but you have also cut off the colored people from God, because their racial history and the Bible tell us that the colored tribesmen need the white people to be their conduit to the living God. So who is being served by Christian utopianism, which condemns the Christian Europeans for their racism and defies the noble savage? No one is being served except the egomaniacs who love their abstract theories of God while denying the living God and condemning His people.

There has been no Christian counterattack against either the secularized Jacobins or the Christian Jacobins. It is primarily the atrocity story that is used to keep Christians in line, particularly the pre-Civil War atrocity stories and the white South Africa atrocity stories. But such stories, when they are not entirely made up, which is generally the case, are never placed where they belong. They are aberrations, unlike the real life atrocities committed in black states which are an intrinsic part of black rule.  Did the South African whites approve of brutality against the blacks? Did the Southern aristocrats, as a whole, countenance brutal, senseless acts of violence against their black slaves? In both cases the answer is no. And if you’re a white person and do not believe that the white South Africans and the white Southerners, being Christian, did not nobly adhere to the code of chivalry when dealing with the lesser breeds without the law, I want to know why you don’t believe in their nobility. Why would you believe the worst about your own people? I think I’ve lived long enough in Liberaldom to answer that question. It is because of intellectual pride. The liberals want to believe that they are better than the antique Europeans. And since they can’t match them in courage, fidelity to the cross of Christ, or charity toward their fellow men, they, the liberals, call their cowardice ‘enlightenment,’ their apostasy becomes the new, purer Christianity, and their lack of charity towards their own people is considered virtuous to the highest degree, because one must, if he loves the negro, hate the white man with his whole heart, mind, and soul.

St. John tells us that if we say we love God but hate our brother we are liars. So let us call the liberals, those self-professed lovers of humanity, whether they are inside or outside the church, what they are. They are liars, they hate their white brothers, their own people, and they hate their God, who lives at the racial hearth fire of the Europeans who still keep a place for Him there. And they hate in the name of the negro. All sins can be washed away if you love the negro. Are such creatures fit to govern us? Macduff supplies the answer: “Fit to govern? Not fit to live!”

The existentialist writers in France in the middle of the 20th century claimed to have discovered that existence precedes essence. But they didn’t discover existentialism. Our people, the Christian Europeans, were the true existentialists. Their God entered human hearts and shattered all the universalist philosophies forever. Christ was the existential God: He was incarnate in human hearts. Why the birth in a stable, why the death on the cross? Why did Christ do all those human things if it was not to impress upon us that we can only know God through our humanity? The people who took the incarnate God into their hearts, our people, the antique Europeans, should not be singled out for extermination because of their racism, they should be singled out as the shining light of the world because they bore witness, through their fidelity to the cross of Christ and the people of their own racial hearth fire, to the living God.

This black plague of the soul that the white man is suffering from has done more damage to the European people than all the natural plagues and all the wars they have ever suffered through. This plague has taken away the white man’s soul, he has given up his spiritual life in order to receive the blessing of the cosmic utopians who promise him a place in their multi-racial utopia. But it is a lie, put forward by the king of liars. There is no place being prepared for the white man in the liberals’ gilded palace of colors. Far better to cling to His promise: “In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.”

In the Gospels when the woman with the issue of blood touched Christ, He felt a healing power go out from His person. When He asked who had touched Him, the apostles were confused because many people had touched Him. But only one person had touched Him spiritually. She believed in Christ, she believed in His power to heal, and spiritually she called on Him by name. When the church men set up a rational system that places a liberal Christ figure in a subordinate position to the negro gods of the secular liberals, there is no real contact between Christ and the Europeans. They have ceased to call on Him by name. The old hymn tells us that there is power in the blood of the Lamb. Yes, there is, but only if we are men of blood determined to keep the channels of grace open. If we leave our racial hearth fire and allow the colored stranger to destroy it, we will not have a place for Him to dwell. We will be left out in the desolate wastes with the carrion birds groaning for burial.

It starts with a vague feeling of disgust and then builds to a passionate hatred. Some men, those who hold sacred Europe in their blood, cannot stomach the new Christ-less world order of the liberal Jacobins. Though they are buffeted by the strong winds of Liberaldom and attacked from within and without by the liberal pestilence and the colored barbarians’ arrows, the remnant band, the Europeans who have called on Him by name, will be the leaders who restore Europe. Death-in-life liberalism will perish, but His people will survive, because they have called on Him from the depths, and He has heard their prayer. +

__________________________________

(1) The chief difference between the neo-pagan liberal and the mad-dog liberal is that the neo-pagan wants to stay with science and reason only, while the mad-dog liberal has realized the need for a personal God, which is why the mad-dog liberals have trumped the neo-pagan liberals. Only Christ can conquer negro worship, the science and rationalism of the neo-pagans is helpless against it.

Posted in Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism, Restoration of European civilization | Tagged | Comments Off on Our European Hearth

The Sweet Vale of Europe

Posted on June 14, 2014 by cwny

Oh, well for the world when the white men join
To prove their faith again!

–Kipling

__________

In one of W.C. Fields’ classic movies, The Man on the Flying Trapeze, his wife sends him downstairs to investigate the sounds emanating from the basement. When he arrives in the basement, he comes upon two burglars who have been distracted from their main task – burglary – by Fields’ homemade apple jack. W.C. is not one to let his ‘guests’ drink alone, so he joins them in what soon becomes a drunken revelry. The song fest brings the police, who arrest the two burglars and take W.C. along as a witness.

At the trial the charges against the crooks are dropped, and W.C. ends up in jail for making apple jack without a license. What then ensues is one of the funniest scenes in the W.C. Fields canon of films. He is thrown in jail with a murderer whom he must mollify or risk being murdered himself.

Murderer: “I had three wives, and this is the first one I have killed in all my life.”

W.C.: “Oh, that’s in your favor, yes. They have no more case against you than the sheep has against the butcher.”

It’s superb comedy, because back then it was an absurd anomaly to depict the government as aggressively prosecuting its own citizens, under the guise of a bureaucratic regulation, while allowing criminals to go scot free. However, when such absurd anomalies become the law of the land, they are no longer funny but cross the line from comedy to tragedy.

We now see, on a daily basis, the tragedy of white governments supporting black murderers, rapists, and looters while prosecuting decent white citizens. Recently in Manchester, England, for instance, a group of white Englishmen intervened to stop some black Muslims from assaulting a white woman. The English police have vowed to “investigate.” Who will they investigate? It won’t be the black Muslims. Whites defending themselves against black barbarian violence or whites defending other whites from black barbarian violence is considered, by our liberal overlords, to be “bad violence.” Nevertheless, despite what the white-hating establishment says, let us applaud those white Englishmen for acting like white men should act. When the hatred of black barbarianism and the desire to protect innocence, as exemplified by the Manchester men, is once again bred into the bone of white men, the colored tide will recede from Europe. But in order to make that “charity of honor” a sustained, continual effort, the Europeans must believe, once again, in Him, for He is the source of that “charity of honor,” which separates the European from the rest of the non-European world.

Before the liberals secured complete ascendancy in the European nations, they used to preach that, “I might disagree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.” That was a tactical lie. What the liberals meant when they preached tolerance was: “We have not yet made negro worship, feminism, and homosexual marriage the law of the land: we still have some selling to do, and a few more Donahue shows should do it.” Once the liberals had total power, the new dictum became: “There are certain things too sacred to allow for open discussion. We must not allow the sacred status of the negro and other people of color to be challenged.” The liberals are tactically correct: there are certain things a nation should not allow to be discussed. White Christians should have refused to even discuss, let alone allow, the integration of the races, the equality of the sexes, or the legalization of homosexuality. When such things are discussed, they eventually will be permitted. This is why the liberals, now that such things are law, no longer permit them to be discussed. The book is closed on opposition to negro worship, feminism, and homosexual marriage: so it is written, so it shall be.

White men cannot be part of the new society; it is written they shall not enter the kingdom of heaven on earth. It is useless for white men to plead for equal rights, justice under the law, or punishment for those who kill and murder whites. All those words – equality, justice, compassion, etc. – were merely subterfuges to place the liberals in power. They were magic words when invoked by the liberals, but now they have no power when invoked by the white Europeans. Upon what ground does the European stand? If he stands on liberal ground and pleads for his “rights” he will be given his rights: he will be slaughtered. That is the only right a white European in Liberaldom has.

There is only one place, one homeland, where a European can make his stand against the liberals and the colored barbarians. That homeland is Christian Europe. The theologians tell us we never had a homeland, and the liberals tell us that which is dead can never be brought back to life. Both groups of speculators are wrong. That which is eternal never dies: Christian Europe is an historical reality, just as Christ’s resurrection is an historical reality, and Christian Europe is an ever present spiritual reality, just as He is an ever present spiritual reality. It is only when we make the antique Europeans and their God a philosophical proposition that we lose sight of the reality of both. The antidote for the modern European’s dislocation from his people and his God can be found in the works of Sir Walter Scott. Heroism, which stems from charity, from the deep and abiding love that can only be nurtured and enkindled at the hearth fires of our kith and kin, is what takes a man away from the abstract love of the colored stranger and the intellectual pride that goes with that kind of abstract love. There is a sympathy of poetic vision between Burke and Scott. Burke gave the European ethos a name; he called it “that charity of honor.” And Scott’s heroes, whom the liberals scorn, had it, the charity that never faileth. We all die: science cannot change that. But we don’t really die if we retain our European charity of honor. That is what we have lost, and it is why we live as though we were dead and why we die in despair.

There is no need for Europeans to live and die in despair. That is what the liberal wish, to inculcate the Europeans with a death-in-life despair. But there is life abundant in the battle to defend the European hearth fire. When a man loves enough to defend his sweet vale of Avoca, he knows what he is and to whom he belongs. The struggle doth availeth: it is the liberal, backed by the devil, who tells us that the fight for home, faith, and race does not availeth.

Who is served by the integration of the negro throughout the European world? Is it a self-evident good that there shall be no more Europeans who love their God and their people with all their heart, mind, and soul? If it is, then I’m morally blind, because I see the demise of the white man and the rise of the colored masses as the triumph of darkness over the light. We have only our trembling faith in the European Christ, the Christ of the Gospels and St. Paul, which gives us hope that darkness will not ultimately triumph.

A trembling faith doesn’t seem like much to put up against the satanic liberal leviathan, but faith, when it is the right kind, can indeed move mountains. But it must be the faith of the European people, our blood faith. Let me digress. In my early twenties, while in Rome, I got a chance to see the Pietà of Michelangelo. Of course I had seen photos of the sculpture, but I had never seen the actual sculpture in the flesh before. I’m not an aesthete — I don’t enjoy art for art’s sake. For instance, the Mona Lisa does not move me at all. I have to have a sympathy with the subject of the artist before I can appreciate the work. As I approached the Pietà, I no longer felt I was in the presence of a work of art, I felt like I was in the presence of the blessed mother and Christ. Through some divine infusion of grace, Michelangelo had managed to put the heart and soul of the living God into stone. My European instincts took over, and I went to my knees and wept. As Christ wept for Lazarus, so we weep for our Lord. The God-Man and His people are one in heart, because both have hearts of flesh. We will fight any foe, no matter how superior in strength and number, bear any burden, no matter how heavy, in order to maintain our blood ties to the God who weeps for us and with us. That is what Burke called for when he urged all Europeans to be true to their instincts, to that charity of honor, and fight the Jacobins.

The colored people, if they ever hope to become anything other than barbarians, must surpass their instincts for blood and try to understand and then imitate the spirit within the European people that makes them worship a God who weeps. The exact opposite is the case with the modern European. He must cease his intellectual meanderings through the desert of modernity and return to his instinctual life, to his racial home, where his people and their God, the God who requires mercy rather than sacrifice, dwells.

Popes kiss the Koran and attend voodoo masses while Protestant clergymen preach the adoration of the negro and the fusion of Judaism and Christianity. This is called moral evolution, where heathenism and blasphemy are joined with a perverted form of intellectual Christianity to form the satanic Christ-less faith of the modern Europeans. It will not be reason that makes us turn from the liberals’ satanic, blended faith of all that is antithetical to the Christian faith of the antique Europeans. It will be instinct that calls us home, away from the filth of negro worship, to that sweet vale of Christian Europe where our kith and kin and the God who weeps dwell. +

Posted in Defense of the White Race, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism, Restoration of European civilization, White Genocide | Tagged | Comments Off on The Sweet Vale of Europe