Sweet Fields Beyond the Plague of Rationalism

Whatever is left in this world of God’s grace comes from human hearts which are not completely closed to St. Paul’s vision of that lonely figure, the son of the living God, standing before the religious atheists and the outright atheists of the Sanhedrin. –CWNY


The conflict between the demonic little dwarf Tony Fauci, who insists there is no clinical evidence to support the claim that the coronavirus is the Wuhan virus, and the conservatives, who assert that the Chinese plague came from the war laboratories in Wuhan, is a microcosm of the tragedy of Western man ever since the beginning of the 20th century. There are the forces of evil, represented by Fauci, the liberals, and the Chinese communists, but there are no corresponding forces of good to counter the forces of evil. And we cannot have a happy conclusion to the fairy tale of European civilization without the forces of good.

Are not the conservatives the forces of good? No, you cannot represent an opposing force to evil when you are a shadow, to once again borrow Dabney’s term, of the evil force which you oppose. The liberal openly disposes of the Christian God in order to adhere to his triune God of the abstract intellect, the noble savage, and science. The conservative wants to keep Christ in the framework of the abstract intellect – he wants Christ the philosopher rather than Christ the savior – while maintaining the noble savage as his savior and science as his holy ghost. It is only when we return to a fairytale vision of life, the vision bequeathed to us by Christ, St. Paul, and the antique Europeans, that we can respond to the forces of evil as Christ would have us respond. What then is missing in the conservative’s response to the evil dwarf and his liberal cohorts? The prophetic fire is missing, the prophetic fire of Isaiah and St. Paul, which is grounded in the charity that never faileth:

It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then the dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began to move in; glittering like the morning star, full of life, and splendor, and joy. Oh! what a revolution! and what an heart must I have, to contemplate without emotion that elevation and that fall! Little did I dream when she added titles of veneration to those of enthusiastic, distant, respectful love, that she should ever be obliged to carry the sharp antidote against disgrace concealed in that bosom; little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fallen upon her in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honour and of cavaliers. I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators, has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever. Never, never more, shall we behold that generous loyalty to rank and sex, that proud submission, that dignified obedience, that subordination of the heart, which kept alive, even in servitude itself, the spirit of an exalted freedom. The unbought grace of life, the cheap defence of nations, the nurse of manly sentiment and heroic enterprise, is gone! It is gone, that sensibility of principle, that charity of honour, which felt a stain like a wound, which inspired courage whilst it mitigated ferocity, which ennobled whatever it touched, and under which vice itself lost half its evil, by losing all its grossness.

– Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France

Can “that charity of honour” be seen? Can we bring charity and honor into the duel of statistics between the liberals and the conservatives? No, we cannot, because charity is not so nominated in the democratic bond we have forged with the devil. We can only bring ‘clinical facts’ that can be seen with the eye of science into the arena, we cannot bring that which can only be seen through the eye into battle. That is the democratic rule. But the liberals’ ‘facts’ come from Satan – they are satanic lies he uses to attack the living God. We cannot counter those lies and the people who live by those lies by referencing the rationality of conservatism and the irrationality of liberalism, because that false definition of good and evil – “We, the conservatives, are good because we are rational, and the liberals are bad because they are irrational” – is part of the great lie, that abstract reason, divorced from the grace of God, can arrive at the truth.

Must we always find some abstract theory of God, must God be put in a golden bowl so that He can be validated by man’s abstract reason? “Yes,” the conservatives tell us. So God resides out there somewhere while the conservatives enter the lists, armed with good solid statistics, but without the full armor of Christ, which can only be worn by those men and women who have allowed the fairytale God into their hearts. In contrast, the liberals enter the lists armed with statistics and the full armor of Satan, because they have allowed the demonic angel of darkness into their hearts. The mad-dog liberals always defeat the classical liberals because they follow that which is within, while the classical liberals, the conservatives, follow that which is without, an abstract God who cannot sustain a man in the day of battle. If liberals demand statistical data to decide whether a nation that has never been Christian and is committed to the ideals of Jacobin France and Stalinist Russia is good or evil, then they have already told you they are beyond the ken of all things human. Why then do the conservatives try to deal with them? You can’t expect to convert the devil, you can only oppose him as our Lord did when he was tempted by him in the desert.

Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil.
And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an hungred.
And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,
And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.
Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;
And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.
Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him.

Matthew 4: 1-11

The conservatives caved in to the temptation of the devil. Our Lord refused to give the devil empirical evidence of His divinity by casting Himself down from the pinnacle of the temple. So they, the conservatives, have taken it upon themselves to present their own miracle to Satan’s minions. They present their marvelous theories to the liberals, which are designed to dazzle them by their rational brilliance. But the liberals are never dazzled by the rational brilliance of the conservatives. They remain unmoved by the prolifers’ scientific proofs that the child in the womb is a living, breathing personality, and they remain adamantly opposed to the slightest suggestion that the Chinese communists created the Wuhan virus with malice aforethought, despite all the conservatives’ empirical evidence of the malice aforethought. Perhaps something besides an appeal to the liberals’ reason is necessary to defeat liberals. Where your treasure lies, so lies your heart. The liberals treasure their triune faith, which is diametrically opposed to Christ’s reign of charity. They will make common cause with any individual or group that attacks Christ through His people – the Chinese communists, the Moslems, the Jews, the colored savages – all are a treasured part of Liberaldom. You can’t, Mr. Conservative, defeat the liberals by showing them how irrational they are. The liberals are rational: they have made a rational decision to defend the faith that is within them — the hatred of Christ and His people – with the cold, rational malignity of the devil. You can’t deal with creatures who hate with that intensity by reasoning with them or appealing to their compassionate nature; those who worship Satan have left compassion behind. You must have something inside, you must have Christ inside, in order to fight the devil and his minions.

The liberals, with an unerring instinct to destroy even the symbolic remains of Christian Europe, have dug up Nathan Bedford Forrest’s and his wife’s remains in order to remove them from hallowed ground. Lee and Stonewall Jackson were great heroes and should always be honored by white Europeans, but Forrest was a hero who stood above them all. I doubt if he ever read Burke, but he was the one man who understood, as Burke understood, that the enemy, the Jacobin liberals, could not be dealt with as if they were Europeans who still remained within the fold of Christ, the Good Shepherd. They were a new breed of unmen who scorned that charity of honor which once was the distinguishing mark of the European. The European civilization of I Corinthians 1:13, the civilization that the theologians tell us never existed, only existed as a civilization in the North American hemisphere in the nation that Nathan Bedford Forrest defended. He was the last fairytale knight of old Europe. It is quite fitting, from Satan’s viewpoint, that he and his wife should be posthumously tried and condemned by the liberal Sanhedrin who hate all those men and women who loved Christ in and through their people.

The liberals and their allies in the organized churches (Pope Francis the blasphemer recently issued a happy Ramadan to the Moslems) have decreed that white people are the major source of evil in the world. And in a certain sense they are right – they, the liberals who have repudiated their European heritage, are the major source of evil in the world. But those other whites, the white people of old Europe who loved Christ, were they evil? That is what the illuminati tell us, but I don’t see my people with the mind of an illuminati; I see my people through the interior eye of the heart. And there I see faith, hope, and charity. Christ entered human history so that we could be part of His story, which is the story of, “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son.” We cannot separate ourselves from the people who took Christ into their hearts, who became part of His story, without losing our souls. The white race is the Christ-bearing race. Even the white grazers who have lost a clear vision of our Lord still show us every time there is a crisis such as a plague, flood, or famine that it is only white people who know what charity is. It is only the liberals, who make war with their heathen allies against the white race, that have not charity because they have repudiated their people, the people who saw a great light.

In Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew, the shrew, Katherina, has taken herself out of our Lord’s loving embrace. She will not serve Him through the channels of grace He has provided. She wants autonomy from all divine-human restraints. But she gradually becomes aware of how His grace works through human channels. And in her submission to her husband, she submits to our Lord:

Such duty as the subject owes the prince,
Even such a woman oweth to her husband;
And when she is froward, peevish, sullen, sour,
And not obedient to his honest will,
What is she but a foul contending rebel
And graceless traitor to her loving lord?—
I am asham’d that women are so simple
To offer war where they should kneel for peace,
Or seek for rule, supremacy, and sway,
When they are bound to serve, love, and obey.
Why are our bodies soft and weak and smooth,
Unapt to toil and trouble in the world,
But that our soft conditions and our hearts

Should well agree with our external parts?
Come, come, you froward and unable worms!
My mind hath been as big as one of yours,
My heart as great, my reason haply more,
To bandy word for word and frown for frown;
But now I see our lances are but straws,
Our strength as weak, our weakness past compare,
That seeming to be most which we indeed least are

The modern conservative needs to see that his reason is not what our Lord wants: He wants our hearts. If we love much we will know how to deal with evil dwarfs and their liberal minions.

The insufficiency of abstract reason to combat liberalism was brought home to me recently when I saw an exchange between a conservative and a liberal, who were discussing the Chinese method of dealing with the coronavirus. The liberal defended the Chinese purging of the virus by the murder of the victims of the virus. The classical liberal was appalled. But why was he appalled? If abstract reason is our touchstone of reality, isn’t it rational to kill the sick so that the healthy can live? The classical liberal, the modern conservative, is Ivan Karamazov. He makes abstract reason his God and then reserves the right to be appalled when Smerdyakov, acting on that premise, commits murder. If Christ be not risen, there is no reason why we should not commit murder for the greater good, the greater good being the biological survival of the herd. Let us step back into the divine narrative of His redemptive love. Our story must be, once again, interwoven with His story. There is indeed, “A Land of Pure Delight,” but we cannot get there except through Him, the Christ of old Europe, whom the liberals mock and the men of reason regard as a poetical triviality, fit for fireside tales at Christmas time but not suited for the serious business of life. Let us shun that rationalism, which is the true plague, and embrace His realm of charity, which passeth the understanding of abstract reason.+

Posted in Charity, Christian Europe, Fairy tale mode of understanding, Rationalism | Tagged , | Comments Off on Sweet Fields Beyond the Plague of Rationalism

A Different Realm

Jesus before Caiaphas – Rembrandt

I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me. –John 17: 23


It has become abundantly clear in this coronavirus crisis that the liberals’ concern is not for the well-being of the American people, black, white, or other. If they were concerned about actual human beings, they would stop the virus in its tracks in the nursing homes by firing all the low-wage illegal immigrant custodial staffs and authorizing the use of the hydroxychloroquine drug at the beginning of the illness, not right before the hour of death. And secondly, they would not shut down businesses that are in safe areas, which constitute most businesses in the United States. What is largely a problem for New York City should not become a problem for the whole nation. And thirdly, they would not use science as a God word to scare the living hell out of people who are at their mercy in a ‘crisis’ such as this.

Let me dwell on that third point. I avoid both the liberals and the conservatives (the classical liberals), because both groups place an inordinate emphasis on man’s abstract reason, independent of an indwelling spiritual connection to Christ. I don’t want to listen to the narrative of either camp, because I don’t want to be drawn into their orbits. The classical liberal generally says kind things about Christianity, and the non-classical liberal says bad things about Christianity, but both parties do not believe, as I believe, that it is the Christian heart, not the abstract intellect that will guide us safely through the labyrinth of existence. So in all things spiritual I do not consult liberals of either the classical or mad-dog liberal mold.

Christians of old Europe used to see themselves as spiritual entities who had to pay attention to their biological outer crust for the sake of the spiritual essence within. It is quite different with the classical liberal and the mad-dog liberal: they believe that nature is all. The antique European rejects that biological view of existence, but there are times when he must rely, to some extent, on the wisdom of the mere nature experts, those who have come to be called the men of science. For instance, if you have a medical problem or if you need to know when a plague is a plague or not, you need someone who knows a little more about science and medicine than you do. But what if the men of science have no conscience? What if they believe, not in “through Christ and in Christ,” but in man’s god-like reason abstracted from the living God? Then, as Ludwig von Drake says, “You’ve got a horrible mess.”

Even in the case of the coronavirus plague, what seems like merely a matter of accumulating the scientific facts is not just a matter of accumulating the scientific facts. Our vision of existence, our spiritual core, even if that core consists of no spiritual substance, will determine how we marshal and interpret the ‘scientific facts.’ That is why there are such divergent views in the scientific community regarding this recent plague, or this recent flu, depending on which authority you believe.

Let me, a non-scientific expert, highlight the problems of a European Everyman during a ‘crisis’ such as we now face: Because I believe, as Burke believed, that if you “suffer any person to tell us his story, morning and evening, but for one twelvemonth, he will become our master,” I do not pay much attention to the liberals’ or the classical liberals’ news sites. So I heard about the coronavirus rather late from one of my sons, who informed me of it. My reaction to the news was much like my reaction when I have just settled down for a long winter’s nap and I hear some kind of commotion on the street in front of my house – “I suppose I’d better get up and see what is happening, because it is right in front of my house.” Like it or not the coronavirus was coming and I had to make certain decisions about it.

So I listened to the various news outlets, news outlets that I usually avoid. With only one exception, Rush Limbaugh, the authorities, both conservative and liberal, said that what was coming was a plague of Biblical proportions. A whole host of scientific and medical experts were projecting death rates that indicated the end of the world. What is an Everyman, a non-expert, to make of such predictions? Do you curl up in a fetal position and refuse to leave your bed? Do you run out in the streets and leap in front of the first speeding car you see? Do you assume sackcloth and ashes and start doing the penances that you always resolved to do someday, but just not today? Or do you do none of the above, and disregard the scientific experts?

I was aided by a certain skepticism in regard to medical experts that I acquired in my early teens, as a result of my interest in weight training. I read Strength and Health magazine, published by the father of American weight-lifting, Bob Hoffman. Mr. Hoffman regularly criticized the medical establishment for their lack of attention to good nutrition and exercise. I came to believe that, “Doctors be all swabs,” and that there was no illness, except one’s final death, that could not be cured by exercise and/or diet. Subsequent events, particularly once I became a father of children, forced me to alter my opinion of doctors – sometimes they were necessary, and all health problems could not be solved by diet and exercise. But I still retained a certain distrust of what the ‘medical experts’ proclaimed; if doctors were not essentially evil as I first believed, they were still not the infallible gods that my fellow countrymen believed them to be.

Hence, I did not quite believe the scientific prophesies of doom that were being so authoritatively bandied about. Now it appears that the medical experts were not experts, they were humbugs in the service of the liberals who wanted there to be a perception that there was a plague so that they could move toward their final solution, the extermination of the white race, at an accelerated pace.

If we grant what has now become obvious, that this virus is not the greatest plague in the history of mankind, what then do we make of it? Some of the conservatives who were screaming pandemic, gloom, gloom and doom, are now saying it was all a hoax. But can they be trusted? Is it an either/or, is it either a pandemic of global proportions or a hoax? Most certainly the food lines and the unemployment have been created by the hoax of the ‘global pandemic.’ But is this a serious illness that warrants some special measures? Perhaps the school and church closings in certain urban areas were warranted. This flu does seem to be more serious than most, although I can’t even be sure of that, because the medical experts have an agenda, a liberal agenda, that they are pushing. So the central problem during this ‘crisis’ is the central problem that a European Everyman faces every day of his life in modern Europe. How can he trust leaders who have rejected Christ as the lodestar of Western civilization?

I concede that in medicine and certain public health issues we must be cognizant of the fact that a man has a biological nature. But if we make abstract reason contemplating man’s biological nature our touchstone of reality, instead of an indwelling spirit, the indwelling spirit of Christ, we will live our lives according to the statistics of the scientists. The most depressing aspect of this ‘pandemic’ is the willingness of conservatives and liberals to base their cases for/or against – panic or hoax – on statistics that ignore individual human beings. For instance, you don’t approvingly cite the Swedes’ ‘herd immunity’ plan even if it flattens their curve. They are murdering their elderly. And you don’t cite the statistics of the coronavirus deaths in urban locations in order to impoverish and starve human beings living in rural areas by ‘shutting them down.’ We have lost our vision of the God-Man, Jesus Christ, the non-utilitarian God who loves particular human beings, not abstract statistics.

“That’s rebellion,” Alyosha said softly.

“Rebellion? I wish you hadn’t used that word,” said Ivan feelingly. “I don’t believe it’s possible to live in rebellion, and I want to live! Tell me yourself–I challenge you: let’s assume that you were called upon to build the edifice of human destiny so that men would finally be happy and would find peace and tranquility. If you knew that, in order to attain this, you would have to torture only one single creature, let’s say the little girl who beat her chest so desperately in the outhouse, and that on her unavenged tears you could build that edifice, would you agree to do it? Tell me and don’t lie!”

“No, I would not,” Alyosha said softly.

-The Brothers Karamazov

Christ stood before a tribunal, a tribunal presided over by the high priest of Judaism, and He was condemned as a blasphemer because He said that He was God incarnate. But there was a people who saw, in the humiliated and crucified Christ, the Savior of the world. The European people’s descent into hell, their abandonment of the vision of the God-Man is a tragedy far greater than this so-called pandemic. The pandemic crisis is in fact part of the ongoing attack against Christ. Once Christ was brought before the tribunal of man’s abstract reason, first by the religious atheists, the scholastics in the Catholic and Protestant churches, then by the outright atheists, the Voltaires and the Shaws, He was condemned again. He has been found wanting by the men of statistics, the philosophers, theologians, and scientists. And He has been condemned as a blasphemer by the liberals. Both groups, the religious atheists and the outright atheists, have told us that Christ is a liar. The theological atheist has felt the need, like Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor, to rework the Christ story because Christ did not return to earth as He promised. And the liberal has felt free to look to a new trinity more in keeping with the needs of modern man. St. Paul stands in contradiction to both camps — he claimed that he lived “through Christ and in Christ.” He felt alive because the grace of God was alive inside of Him. That was also the faith of the European people: they saw, in their inmost hearts, the Savior that St. Paul encountered on the road to Damascus. Whatever is left in this world of God’s grace comes from human hearts which are not completely closed to St. Paul’s vision of that lonely figure, the son of the living God, standing before the religious atheists and the outright atheists of the Sanhedrin. Has Christ left us? No, we have left Him.

When Donald Trump went before the liberal Sanhedrin, the Fourth Estate, he was trying to include them in his mission of compassion. He was inviting them to join with him in the fight against the coronavirus, but the Sanhedrin wanted no part of Trump’s mission. They wanted to condemn Trump, because they view him as the font of all evil: He is a white man, and as such a creature he has a connection to the God-Man whom they hate. The ‘press conferences’ became min-trials at which Trump was always found guilty. Haven’t we, the remnant band of Christian Europeans, faced such tribunals in our lives? The home schooling parent, the politically incorrect teacher, the blogger who has been condemned for ‘hate speech,’ the anti-abortion protestor, and every other man, woman, or child who has deviated from the norms of the liberals have felt the wrath of the modern defenders of Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth.

A drowning man will grasp at any life preserver he can, so I do not blame the whites who have been thrown out of work and impoverished by the liberals’ coronavirus onslaught for organizing protests in the name of their civil liberties. But there are no civil liberties outside of Christian Europe. There is no freedom, no civil liberty, in a republic dedicated to Satan. It is only when we see liberalism for what it is, and Christ for what He is, that we will have the grace, the will, and the heart, to depose Satan who currently rules the European nations through his liberal minions.

We can’t reason with demons. The liberals are not misinformed, they know what they are doing when they withhold medicine from those who are ill in order to inflate the pandemic statistics. And they know what they are doing when they ‘close down’ people’s livelihoods. They are pure evil. We can’t fight them by way of demoncracy. We must see that we belong to another realm of existence, a realm of human hearts connected to His divine heart. Our prayer is always the non-liberal prayer, it is His prayer: “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.”+

Posted in Christ, Classical liberalism, Rationalism, Scientism | Tagged | Comments Off on A Different Realm

Shall Malice Bear Down Truth?

It is thus, and for the same end, that they endeavor to destroy that tribunal of conscience which exists independently of edicts and decrees. Your despots govern by terror. They know, that he who fears God fears nothing else; and therefore they eradicate from the mind, through their Voltaire, their Helvetius, and the rest of that infamous gang, that only sort of fear which generates true courage. Their object is, that their fellow citizens may be under the dominion of no awe, but that of their committee of research and of their lanterne. –Burke, A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly


And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire. And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory. And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they gnawed their tongues for pain, And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds. –Book of Revelations 16: 8-11


In Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice Shylock seeks to use the law to cut the heart out of Antonio whom he hates because he is a Christian and because he lends money without charging interest. Shylock’s subterfuge is exposed and his bloody purpose is thwarted when Portia steps in and enforces the spirit of the law, which stands in stark contrast to Shylock’s twisted interpretation of the letter of the law.

The white grazers and the white conservatives have not yet come to the same conclusion as Portia came to – they do not see that behind the liberals’ façade of democracy and fairness is pure, dephlegmated evil. The liberals want to destroy the white grazers, not because the grazers are Christian as Antonio was, but because their ancestors once were Christian. Nothing will deter the liberals from pursuing their desired blood-path, no appeal to their better nature (they have none), no appeal to their sense of justice (they have none), and no appeal to their humanity (they have none) will avail.

I pray you, think, you question with the Jew.
You may as well go stand upon the beach
And bid the main flood bate his usual height;
You may as well use question with the wolf,
Why he hath made the ewe bleat for the lamb;
You may as well forbid the mountain pines
To wag their high tops and to make no noise
When they are fretten with the gusts of heaven;
You may as well do anything most hard,
As seek to soften that—than which what’s harder?—
His Jewish heart.

Merchant of Venice

The liberals have interiorized Satan’s hatred of the Christ-bearing race. They will not cease from their satanic course until the white race is destroyed. Their sacrificial altars must flow with the blood of white people in order to satisfy their internal bloodlust. “We will have sacrifice, not mercy,” is the war cray of the liberals.

The grazer cannot see the evil of the liberals because he has been spiritually anesthetized by intellectual Christianity in the churches, which is religious atheism, and by democracy, which is a system of government conceived in hell and dedicated to the proposition that everything humane and Christian is undemocratic and therefore evil. Hence the grazer has nowhere to turn. He can’t turn to organized Christian atheism to find redress for the evils of democracy, because organized Christian atheism has decreed that Christian Europe was not Christian Europe, it was racist and sexist Europe and its people are damned. Their descendants must repent, they must become liberal, or else they too will be damned. So the grazers put on sackcloth and ashes and return to democracy. And there they are told the same thing: you must show true contrition by democratically consenting to your own destruction.

The liberals’ ‘take no prisoners’ assault on the white race through the coronavirus crisis is the result of the white grazers’ refusal to self-destruct by way of democracy. They voted for a man, a Prometheus, who wanted to keep them alive. The Fourth Estate’s vicious attacks on Trump are attacks on the constituency that he represents, white people begging for a chance to live and breathe within the confines of a charnel house dedicated to Satan. If you cannot see that the liberals’ hatred of Trump, which is a hatred so intense that it can have only one source, is an attack on the Christ-bearing race you are either a liberal yourself or else you are a spiritually anesthetized grazer. No man can stand up to the satanic hatred that Trump has had to endure. No man should have to. What did he do to warrant such hatred? He took pity on white people — that is what he did. The liberals’ attack on Trump is an attack on thee and me. Every single death from the coronavirus is a result of the liberals’ refusal to stop all dealings with the Chinese communists. And how can you look at the unemployment lines and the food lines without feeling pity for the whites in those lines and hatred for the liberals who have brought such devastation among us? When Ariel relates the sufferings of the refugees on the island, he says to Prospero –

That if you now beheld them, your affections
Would become tender.
Prospero. Does thou think so, spirit?
Ariel. Mine would, sir, were I human.
Prospero. And mine shall.
Hast thou, which art but air, a touch, a feeling,
Of their afflictions, and shall not myself,
One of their kind, that relish all as sharply
Passion as they, be kindlier mov’d than thou art?

The Tempest

The conservative Olympians in church and state have not come down from Mt. Olympus to defend Prometheus or the people for whom he stole the electoral fire because they do not believe there is a bond between them and the white race. They have no kith and kin, they are pure mind. What is needful, in their minds, is an intelligence that is above human passions and sentimental attachments. They do not believe in the old notion of, “One of their kind.” And that philosophy makes them useless in the battle that is raging, the battle of Satan and his liberal minions against the white race, which once championed the God-Man, Jesus Christ.

Rush Limbaugh is one of the few conservatives who has stepped down from Mt. Olympus to support Trump. He recently stated that the liberals have lost all control of themselves. Their hatred of Trump has reached the level of insanity. That is true, but I would change ‘insanity’ to ‘satanic.’ And I would add that the liberals have always been satanic, but now they no longer are capable of hiding their passionate hatred of Christ and His people. What has Trump done that has drawn the liberals out? We must deal with their hatred because we should take pity on Trump and any man who is facing what he is facing, and we must deal with the liberals’ hatred because it is not just directed at Trump, it is directed at every single white who will not agree to the destruction of the white race. And that really is the crux of the matter. Yes, the liberals are angry because they thought the election was a done deal, and they saw it wrested away just as it was in their grasp. But they have lost before and managed to control their emotions and wait for the next election. What made Trump’s victory different? First and foremost, he did not accept the ruling premise of liberalism that the white race must self-destruct. He was not and is not a white supremacist, which is a pity because the white supremacy that the liberals abhor simply means that whites should love their own people, but he is not a believer in the liberals’ doctrine of “The white race must perish.” And the second reason that Trump has made the liberals take off their masks and reveal themselves in all their satanic fury is that Trump has shown a sincere Christian desire to stop legalized infanticide. The demons who run our nation cannot tolerate such an outrage. And they will rage, rage against even one small ray of light in the dark night that they have worked so hard to spread over the face of the earth.

Theoretically we are governed by a system of checks and balances with a judiciary, a Congress, and a chief executive. That theory is incorrect. We are governed by the Fourth Estate, which consists of an intellectual elite – academics, journalists, media pundits, scientists, and the usual assortment of psychiatrists and sociologists. That Fourth Estate is in reality a fifth column. They do everything in their power to break down any and every regime that ‘stinks’ of Christianity. They always support regicide in the name of liberty, equality, and fraternity.

What direction the French spirit of proselytism is likely to take, and in what order it is likely to prevail in the several parts of Europe, it is not easy to determine. The seeds are sown almost every where, chiefly by newspaper circulations, infinitely more efficacious and extensive than ever they were. And they are a more important instrument than generally is imagined. They are a part of the reading of all, they are the whole of the reading of the far greater number. There are thirty of them in Paris alone. The language diffuses them more widely than the English, though the English too are much read. The writers of these papers indeed, for the greater part, are either unknown or in contempt, but they are like a battery in which the stroke of any one ball produces no great effect, but the amount of continual repetition is decisive. Let us only suffer any person to tell us his story, morning and evening, but for one twelvemonth, and he will become our master. –Burke, Thoughts on French Affairs

Trump’s ‘victory’ was not a victory because he can do nothing to supplant the liberal Fourth Estate that rules our nation and all the European nations. But Trump’s crucifixion has shown those who have eyes to see the truth about liberals – they are demonic. This is the fourth outbreak of the liberals’ naked-fist demonism; the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, and the Northern war of extermination in the 1860’s were the other three. Will it just be business as usual when the coronavirus war is over? We cannot know such things for certain, but it appears highly unlikely that the white grazers will repudiate intellectual Christianity or democracy in order to embrace His Europe. (1)

We always will believe a lie when we accept the enemy’s definitions of existence. The liberals’ death wish is not a death wish. They will surely die from their attempt to strike out at God through the white race. But in attacking the white race, the liberals think they are fleeing from death. In their minds Christ represents pain, suffering, and death. The hard-eyed atheist, George Bernard Shaw, excoriated Christianity as the cruelest of all religions. What is cruel about Christianity? We are not promised a kingdom of God on earth, we are not promised lives devoid of suffering and death. It is the liberals’ hope that science, their Holy Ghost, can relieve them from suffering. But what about death? Can the abstract intellect of man, the noble black savage, or science save them from the death they seek to avoid by rejecting Jesus Christ? It would seem, from a Christian perspective, that the liberals’ flight from Christ does not free them from death, it only places them with the swine as they go over the cliff. However, if a man foreshortens his vision, if he focuses only on the ecstatic moment, on the demonic fire within, he can convince himself that death cannot overtake him so long as he avoids the God-man. Is that insanity? No, it is something even larger than insanity, it is pure demonism. And that is the inner dynamic of liberalism. The liberals have interiorized the hatred of Christ. They cannot be defeated by intellectual Christians or democracy-loving conservatives. They can only be defeated by a people who have interiorized the love of Christ, the love of Him who died on the cross to save us from sin and death. Such people will hate where they should hate: they will hate the liberals and all their works; and they will love where they should love: they will love His people and fight to perpetuate His reign of charity here on earth rather than conserving Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth.

The lack of His influence in the European nations is crystal clear when we look at the European governments’ willingness to trade with the communist Chinese. Aren’t such trade deals, in which China receives most favored nation status, a direct deal with the devil? What can we say of a people who willingly trade with the devil? In this coronavirus crisis, the devil that the liberals worship has once again shown himself to be a liar. We were supposed to recognize Red China because, ‘You can’t just ignore a whole country.’ So the eager capitalists and their liberal allies dealt with China; it was the practical, worldly thing to do. Was it right? No, it wasn’t, but what is right is never practical, so we were and are told. But now the devil has betrayed his minions. The juggling fiend has brought them down in the practical realm as well as in the spiritual realm. He has ruined their economies. Will it make a difference? Will the Demon-crats be held accountable for trafficking with Satan? They most certainly will be held accountable at the last judgement, but I doubt that there will be a reckoning in any court of justice in this world, because our modern courts of justice are courts of injustice: they are liberal courts. What justice there is in this world comes by way of men with hearts connected to Him, not by way of men with minds connected to intellectual Christianity and democracy. The hero in C. S. Lewis’s novel Perelandra is given the rare privilege of coming face to face in single combat with Satan, and he is able to fight without holding back. Perhaps, now that the liberals have become so openly satanic we too will be called upon to fight them without holding back. If we fight in His name, if we interiorize our love of the Jesus whom the liberals hate, they will face an army like they have never faced before. And by the grace of God, we shall conquer. Tis a consummation, a victory, devoutly to be wished. +


(1) The two great commandments of the Fourth Estate are – ‘Stay home’ and ‘Wash your hands.’ But if I’m staying home because the coronavirus is out there and not in my home, why must I wash my hands one-hundred times a day? Because I ponder such existential paradoxes, and because I grew up hearing radical sixties’ folk songs about Billy Joe McCallister and answers that were blowing in the wind, I took the time to compose a new-old folk song for the coronavirus era. To be sung to the tune of Blowing in the Wind:

How many months can a man stay at home,
Before he jumps off a bridge?
The answer my friend,
Is blowing in the coronavirus wind,
The answer is blowing in the coronavirus wind.

How many times can a man wash his hands,
And still retain his skin?
The answer my friend,
Is blowing in the coronavirus wind,
The answer is blowing in the coronavirus wind.

And for how many years will white people hide in their homes,
And pretend the liberals are their friends?
The answer my friend,
Is blowing in the coronavirus wind,
The answer is blowing in the coronavirus wind.

Posted in Christ, Democracy, Grazers, Religion of Satan | Tagged , | Comments Off on Shall Malice Bear Down Truth?

Out of the Shadows

As a rood was I raised up; I bore aloft the mighty King, the Lord of heaven; I durst not stoop.

– “The Dream of the Rood”


When I was a child growing up in the 1950’s my parents allowed me to watch a television show called Captain Kangaroo. The star of the show wore a captain’s uniform with big pockets like a kangaroo’s pouch. I knew that Captain Kangaroo was not really a kangaroo, even as a child, but it wasn’t until I got older that I discovered Captain Kangaroo was not a captain. I think I should be forgiven my naiveté about Captain Kangaroo’s false identity, because after all I was only a child. But what are we to make of seemingly grown-up people who regard the World Health Organization as a world health organization? It is quite obvious that the W.H.O. is a branch of the Chinese communists’ war department, a war department that is concerned not with world health, but with death and destruction. So again, what do we make of people who defend that organization? Are they just naïve, as I was naïve when I thought Captain Kangaroo was a captain? No, that is not the case; they are not children. Are they stupid? No, that is not the case either. Are they morally blind because they have rejected the light of the world? Yes, that is the case. “There are none so blind as those who will not see.” All liberals refuse to see evil because they have given their souls to the evil angel of darkness who prowls about the world seeking the ruin of souls. Nothing can make them declare that the communist Chinese are evil, just as nothing will make them declare that legalized abortion, homosexual marriage, and the demonization of the white race is evil. They have crossed a moral Rubicon, and they do not plan on going back.

The white liberal — and there are no non-white liberals — has set himself against the white race because white Europeans once built a civilization dedicated to the Light of the world. No other people, as a people, loved so much that they saw, “His blood upon the rose?” Now that Old Europe has been condemned by the liberals and its reality has been denied by the churchmen, from what moral ground can the European Everyman condemn and fight Chinese communists, Muslim terrorists, black murderers, Aztec warriors and liberal adherents of Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth? They have no moral ground to stand on. The clergy bids them take comfort in a mind-forged God that is impersonal and forever changing, the colored heathens continue to rage against the white race simply because they are heathens who have never known the light, and the liberals attack the white race because the continued existence of white people gives them a vague fear of that which once was and they hope shall never be again. But is that hope a certainty? Can the liberals ever be sure that they have banished Christ from Europe forever? No, they can’t, which is why they attack the white race with a maniacal fury infinitely greater than the colored heathens’ rage.

I once had the misfortune to share a 45-minute train ride with a nun who was returning from some kind of Eastern mysticism conference where she met with mystics from the Orient. She shared her mystical experience of the divine oneness with me. I was in my mid-twenties, having fairly recently come to a belief in the Christ of the Gospels, of St. Paul, and of the antique Europeans. The nun’s ecumenical, mystical atheism sickened me. But I politely listened to her — perhaps I should have silenced her — as we rather slowly, all too slowly, made our way home. The woman finally became aware that I was not responding to her mystical rapture with the proper enthusiasm, so she asked me point blank what I thought. I told her. The substance of my response was the words of our Lord: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” We passed the rest of the way in silence.

We cometh to the Father through Christ, and we cometh to Christ through our humanity. If the people who took Christ into their hearts are damned, if they didn’t know Christ, to whom can we turn for the words of eternal life? The liberals tell us we can turn to them, to their triune faith, and the theologians tell us we can turn to their systematic theology or to their Chardinian mysticism. But we must not turn to the antique Europeans, we must not turn to the Word made flesh in Old Europe because, the theologians tell us, the Word never was made flesh in Old Europe; we cannot find the heart of Christ in that culture.

“As a history of the world, the empirical history after Christ is qualitatively not different from the history before Christ if judged from either a strictly empirical or a strictly Christian viewpoint.”

Karl Lowith’s words of ‘wisdom’ are not atypical. He presents the intellectuals’ Olympian view of Christian Europe: It never existed! All those men and women who lived and died with the vision of the Rood in their hearts never really existed, there is simply no evidence from an “empirical” or “strictly Christian” viewpoint of their existence. If we strike the words, “strictly Christian” and substitute the word “utopian,” we will come to the crux of the matter: There never was a Christian Europe unless that Christian Europe can be proven to be a utopian paradise. But such a paradise can never come about on this earth. And to denounce Christian Europe and her people because Christian Europe was not utopia leaves us bereft of our history and our hope in ages past. If the people who loved much did not show us the way to God, through the eyes of the heart, then how can we know God? “You can’t,” the theologians tell us. “Your God is a myth,” the liberals tell us. Then both sets of experts bid us turn to their intellects as a guide. What will happen if we reject the experts and return to the Dream of the Rood Europeans? We will recover our souls, we will respond to existence with the heartfelt passion of a people who have seen a great light in the depths of their heart.

The cold malignity of the thoroughbred metaphysician that Burke writes about has cast a pall, a satanic pall, over the European people. In this new phase of the war against the Christ-bearing people, the crisis of the communist Chinese virus, the liberals have made explicit what was always implicit in liberalism. The liberals hate humanity as Satan hates humanity. And the liberals most particularly hate white people because of their past connection to that “mysterious stranger” who died on a cross for our sins. Some conservatives have told me that the liberals have over-played their hands; they should not have been so explicit with their support of the Chinese communists, because now the American people will reject them. Is that true, will the blatant attack on the white race turn the white grazers against the liberals? No, it will not, because the “conservatives” are not conservative. Let us go back a few decades.

In 1949 the quintessential liberal, Arthur Schlesinger Jr., published a book called The Vital Center in which he criticized the far left progressives who would not admit that communism in Russia had failed and that communism posed a threat to liberal democracy. Such views in today’s political climate would mark Schlesinger as a conservative. But of course Schlesinger was not a conservative, he was the type of conservative that Dabney labeled “the shadow that follows Radicalism!” We can’t oppose communism in the name of liberal democracy, because liberal democracy and communism proceed from the same Jacobin roots. If we go deeper into Schlesinger’s book, we see just how thoroughly liberal he was. He denounced Burkean conservatism as “the ethical afterglow of feudalism… inappropriate in a non-aristocratic, dynamic, progressive business society of the United States.” Schlesinger wanted the same thing the far left progressives wanted, the kingdom of God on earth without God, but he favored a more moderate march, a less bloody march forward. And so it is with our modern “conservatives” who want to oppose the communists while preserving our “democratic ideals,” when it is our democratic ideals that have left us naked to our communist enemies and all the enemies of Christian Europe. If the white European Americans had been asked, “Do you want America to be overrun by Mexicans?”; if they had been asked, “Do you want your economy and your access to essential medical supplies to be dependent on the communist Chinese?”; and if they had been asked, “Do you want to allow a strong, Islamic presence in your country?”, do you think they would have voted ‘yes’ on any of those issues? Yet we have been invaded by Mexicans, we are dependent on the Chinese communists, and we do have a strong Islamic presence in our nation. Why? It is because the liberals do not frame their questions to the white grazers in terms of invasions and economic independence, they ask the question, “Do you want democracy and all the magnificent freedoms that come with democracy?” Then the grazers scream, “Give us Barabbas, give us democracy!” and Christ is crucified again through His people, who are crucified by the purveyors of democracy.

When this so-called pandemic started, which has turned out to be a flu like all other flus, great medical experts were telling us that we could no more stop this, the communist Chinese virus, than we could stop the wind. The ‘experts’ were really referring to liberalism, not to a virus. They were and are telling us that we shall not try to impede liberalism or we shall be punished. The shutdowns are not because of the virus, the shutdowns are punitive. To the liberals, Trump’s election represents an impediment to the forward march of the liberals. The disgusting white pigs who voted for him must be punished. And they are being punished. Look at the food lines, look at the unemployment figures. But we can’t turn to the conservatives who are the shadows of the liberals to save us. Stephen Tonsor, a 1960s conservative, echoed Schlesinger’s criticism of Burke, and even Richard Weaver castigated Burke for his rejection of forms in favor of the particular. Yes, Burke did reject formal theology and philosophy. He preferred a particular, personal God, the God of our ascending race, instead of the unknown God of philosophy and theology, and he preferred a particular people, the antique Europeans, to a universal aggregate called mankind. Burke’s and Dabney’s conservatism was grounded in our Dream of the Rood ancestors. That ground, the ground consecrated by the blood of Christ, is the ground we must stand on and never yield even though the liberals tell us we must yield or be crushed.

This communist Chinese virus attack has devastated the European people because they have turned their eyes away from the cross to that which is without, to science, reason, and the gods of nature. Our true faith lies within –

“Now I have joy of life that I can seek the triumphant cross alone more often than all men, do it full honour. Great is the desire for that in my heart, and to the cross I turn for help.”

It was not wrong to shut down the schools and churches in an attempt to stem the virus. God knows, considering what is taught in both places, it would be a great good to shut those twin towers of atheism down forever, but the liberals didn’t shut down the private businesses and the family gatherings because they wanted to help their people. They shut down businesses and family gatherings because they wanted to impoverish white people and drive them to despair. They used statistical aggregates to justify their treacherous onslaught. And the ‘conservative’ shadows of the liberals are no better. The conservatives are now pointing to Sweden as our model. (1) Sweden? The nation that has destroyed itself from within by handing their country over to Moslems? The nation that has made sexual perversion the law of the land? I don’t care about your statistics, Mr. Conservative, or your theories of the herd and the greater good – “Let us let the virus run its course.” The statistics of expedience belong in hell, in Satan’s kingdom of eternal night. We need to look to that which is within, to His kingdom come. Before Christ became a by-product of a syllogism, He was Our Lord and Savior who could, when seen with the eyes of the heart, guide us through an existential maze that our rational minds could not pass through. There is no ‘solution’ to the communist Chinese virus crisis from without. The solution lies within. ‘Dream of the Rood’ Europeans do not yield to statistics, plagues, or the devil’s minions. They still dream dreams and see the vision of Him who died on the cross to save them from sin and death. +


(1) In Tom Brown’s School Days Thomas Hughes tells us that Dr. Arnold closed down Rugby for a term when a deadly virus was sweeping through the school. Arnold of Rugby was a Christian of the old school — he sought to do what Christ would have done. The Demon-crats did not close the schools and churches out of concern for the health of American citizens, they closed the schools and churches to get Trump. And they closed the white businesses and instituted house arrests in order to get white people. The Swedes did not keep their schools, churches, and businesses open to help white people. They didn’t have any Trump to get, so they decided, based strictly on utilitarian principles, to risk the lives of the expendable elderly whites in order to keep their satanic kingdom in working order. It is morally reprehensible, it is a sin without pardon, for ‘conservatives’ to laud the Swedish model. We cannot continue to look only at systems, without judging what is inside, at the heart of the systems we are supporting. Give us Christ, not Barabbas.

Posted in Christ, Classical liberalism, Democracy | Tagged | Comments Off on Out of the Shadows


Now that society is satanic, Satan is a conservative. – CWNY (2012)


And it came to pass, as he went to Jerusalem, that he passed through the midst of Samaria and Galilee.  And as he entered into a certain village, there met him ten men that were lepers, which stood afar off: And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy on us.
And when he saw them, he said unto them, Go shew yourselves unto the priests. And it came to pass, that, as they went, they were cleansed.
And one of them, when he saw that he was healed, turned back, and with a loud voice glorified God,
And fell down on his face at his feet, giving him thanks: and he was a Samaritan.
And Jesus answering said, Were there not ten cleansed? but where are the nine?
There are not found that returned to give glory to God, save this stranger.
And he said unto him, Arise, go thy way: thy faith hath made thee whole.

Luke 17: 11-19

In the 1959 Disney movie Sleeping Beauty, Prince Phillip must face “all the forces of hell” when he faces Maleficent, who throws off her human façade in order to assume her true identity — a reptilian, satanic fiend. That is what is so striking about the liberals in this new phase of their onslaught against God – all attacks on God must proceed through His people – they no longer feel the need to hide their satanic essence behind a human mask. They have ‘come out’ in all their satanic fury. They tell us quite openly that they would rather see millions of people die of the virus than see Trump reelected. They openly sanction gay pride marches, women’s marches, and Islamic worship services while suppressing white businesses and all gatherings of whites – “where two or three are gathered together.” But will the liberals’ unmasking do them any harm? The old adage is apropos – ‘If a tree falls in a forest and there is no one there, does it make a sound?’ If there are no Christian Europeans left in the European nations, will anyone notice that the liberals are satanic?

Unfortunately the liberals’ unmasking will not awaken the white grazers to the satanic nature of the liberals. Many of them are angry at the Demoncrats, but they are angry without a sustaining faith. Their anger will dissipate when the plague dissipates. What is needful will still be missing – a people who see that the liberals, and the democratic governments they have created, are satanic. It is not possible to live according to the liberals’ laws and God’s laws. There is a huge difference between an imperfect government grounded in a faith in the God-Man, Jesus Christ, such as the French monarchy prior to the French Revolution, and a Jacobin-democratic government grounded in atheism, regicide, and a faith in the man-god, the noble savage. The Christian seeks to mitigate the imperfections of the former government from within, he does not seek to destroy the moral essence of that government through revolution. But the latter type of government, a government grounded in atheism, regicide, and a faith in the man-gods of nature, must be destroyed, it cannot be reformed. That is why Burke remained passionately opposed to the revolutionary French Jacobins even after Robespierre’s death. The evil Jacobin entity, disguised as democracy, still remained at the heart of the French government. When liberals hold the reins of power, the conservative has to become a counter-revolutionary, otherwise his conservatism is merely liberalism in disguise. Robert Lewis Dabney made the same observation as Burke in his criticism of the conservatives of the North. Having destroyed the Christian South they proceeded on their merry way to utopia by staying just slightly behind the liberals who were busy destroying all the channels of God’s grace.

It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent: Northern conservatism. This is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. . . . Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always when about to enter a protest very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its “bark is worse than its bite,” and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent role of resistance: The only practical purpose which it now serves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it “in wind,” and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy, from having nothing to whip. No doubt, after a few years, when women’s suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of suffrage to asses. There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position. –Robert Lewis Dabney

Have we reached the final position in this, the 21st century? I think we have ‘progressed’ beyond Dabney’s final position. We have extended suffrage to Demoncrats who are infinitely inferior to, and more dangerous than, asses. “Fit to govern? No, not fit to live,” should be our response to the Demoncrats. Yet when the coronavirus fades away, the conservatives will go back to defending Demoncracy. They will continue to place their hopes in elections to determine who shall reign in hell.

Liberalism is grounded in a faith in the man-god that emanates from the mind of the liberal. Whether that god is the noble savage or the Übermensch, it is still the same god, it is the mind of man. There has been no conservative reaction to the liberals’ mind-forged religion of the man-god because the conservatives in the church reacted to the deification of the man-god by demonizing man. They championed a God without humanity, without a human heart, in order to oppose the man-god of the liberals. But does our faith depend on a false either-or? Is it a choice between God and man? No, it is not. The liberals and the ‘conservative’ theologians are one, in that they both deny the divinity within man, the grace of God, in order to place their faith in the God without, which is human reason. That great champion of Pauline, Christ-in-man Christianity, Pastor Grundtvig of Denmark, fought the good fight when he championed the “living wellsprings” of the human heart that bind us to the living God. Those “living wellsprings” are the only weapons we have to combat the Demoncrats of Demoncracy. Without those wellsprings we are naked to our enemies, our conservatism will not help us because it is grounded in the preservation of liberalism.

Chesterton lauded St. Thomas Aquinas for engineering the only successful revolution in the Church. Aquinas placed God out there, in man’s abstract reason, and left St. Paul’s injunction to “search the Scriptures with your heart,” back in the days of unreason and superstition. After that revolution, clerical conservatism became the defense of scholasticism rather than the defense of a heartfelt faith in Jesus Christ; the religious conservatives and the secular liberal became one in their defense of abstract reason and their condemnation of the divinity, the God-given divinity, within man.

The same ‘conservative’ defense of liberalism that took place in the church has taken place in our secular Demoncracy. First the conservatives opposed the deification of Martin Luther King Jr. by pointing out that a whoremonger and a communist should not be set up as a national icon. But once he became part of the fabric of democracy, the conservatives lauded him just as much, if not more, than their liberal colleagues. So it was with the feminists. I recall a debate that William F. Buckley had in England with Germaine Greer. Buckley began the debate by surrendering. He stated he was not in England to dispute the equality of women, he was only there to question whether it was necessary to pass an equal rights amendment in order to reach that admirable goal of equality. Thus the desire to conserve Demoncracy doth make moral cowards of its adherents.

Bruce Catton, the Lincoln apologist who masqueraded as a historian of the Civil War, once wrote that American democracy, when implemented properly, namely with the full enfranchisement of negroes, represented “freedom from all fears.” Really? Do we no longer need to fear the pestilence that walketh in darkness and the arrows that flieth at noon day if we adhere to the principles of Demoncracy? Do we no longer need to fear death itself? With no due respect I disagree with Catton. If we believe in “We the People” democracy rather than His Europe, we become part of an incorporate union of demons committed to a flight from Christ, which can only have one end – over the cliff with the swine.

In the U.S. (the other European nations differ only in degree not in kind) over half our population, the Demoncrats, are completely satanic; they have left all things human behind. And the Republicans, the party that Dabney described as the “party which never conserves anything,” are committed to a more gradual implementation of the satanic principles of the Demoncrats. They do not have any heartfelt convictions that lead them to say, “Stop, this must not go on.” They have only a moderate, rational objection to change they think is too violent and sudden. That is not sufficient. We must be composed of sterner stuff. We must, we Europeans, say, “Stop, this must not go on!”

An acquaintance, who is an Olympian conservative, recently asked me why I have such sympathy for Trump since he has accomplished so little, when viewed from the Olympian heights of conservative theory. I told the Olympian I admire Trump because he is Prometheus. If you recall, Prometheus was a minor god in the Greek pantheon who stole fire from the major gods in order to give it to mortals, whom he took pity on. Prometheus was punished for his concern for insignificant mortals; he was bound to a rock while vultures pecked at his liver. Trump, as a billionaire, was a minor god in Liberaldom. He could have remained materially happy and comfortable, keeping his friendships with the Hollywood celebrities and enjoying his later years by jetting around the world spending his money on luxuries. Instead, he stole electoral fire from the gods of Liberaldom and sought to give that power to white people. He failed to defeat the liberals and save white people, because you can’t defeat the demons of Liberaldom from within the confines of Demoncracy. Now Trump can only endure while the Coulters, the Drudges, and the rest of the liberal vultures peck out his entrails. The original Prometheus was saved by the God-Man, Hercules. Trump needs, like all of us, the real God-Man, who Aeschylus saw through a glass darkly; he needs Christ the Lord to come and release him from the Promethean rock. Our Jesus comes to us through the Christ-imbued hero. We must attack the Demoncrats in His name, not in the name of Demoncracy.

Democracy is Demoncracy because there is no place for the Christian hero within the democratic system. (1) We are told we must dialogue with inhuman fiends rather than deal with them in the only way possible to deal with demons, the way Prince Philip dealt with Maleficent. If we take that spirit into battle, the spirit of the Christian warrior who fights in defense of His realm of charity, we will truly have a solid ground from which to launch a counter-revolution. We will be moving away from Yeats’s rough beast, the demonic man-god of Liberaldom, who is a composite of Nietzsche’s Übermensch and Rousseau’s Noble Savage, back to that stable in Bethlehem where all counter-revolutions against Demoncracy begin.

The Demoncrats’ selective shutdowns of white business and their passionate hatred of the use of any drug that helps stem the coronavirus-related deaths has given us a rare glimpse of liberalism unmasked. We will remain in the liberals’ merciless clutches if we treat their satanic power over us as something that is written, something akin to fate. If we remain pagans, if we deny that we are the Christ-bearing people, then we will be fated to serve the liberals on this earth and serve Satan in the next world. Far better to adhere to the foolishness of the cross, to the God who transcends fate and bids us follow Him. That is the exact opposite of the Demoncrats who command us go over the cliff with the swine. Jesus came and stood in the midst of His disciples after His resurrection from the dead and told them, “As the Father has sent me, even so send I you.” We are called to fight the devil and all his works just as our Lord did. We are called to advance His reign of charity, not to conserve Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth. +


(1) Democracy never works because truth is always diluted in a democracy. You must compromise with evil in order to form a majority coalition. By doing so you become like unto the Nicolaitanes condemned by our Lord in the Book of Revelations: you have elevated the blending of Christ and paganism into a doctrine.

Christ is truth, paganism is falsehood, and never the twain shall meet. We have left Christian monarchies behind. Let us pray for a good dictator, a man who rules in His name.

Posted in Christ, Democracy, Grazers | Tagged | Comments Off on Demon-crats

Clinically Unproven

Love now consists in word and not in deed,
Faith depends on reason not on the Scriptures, as it used to be;
Religion has ascended from the heart to the head
It now dwells in the brains, and the heart, alas! is empty.

-Jeremias de Dekker


There can be no middle ground between Satan and Christ. We either worship our own minds, which can be easily manipulated by Satan’s superior mind, or we can give our hearts to Christ and venture forth, armed with the grace of God, in opposition to Satan and his minions.


David Horowitz, a former mad-dog liberal who converted to classical liberalism (conservatism) recently stated that he had never seen anything in American politics that even came close to the hatred the liberals have for Trump. Their hatred is so great that they cannot join with Trump to combat the coronavirus. Horowitz wanted to know the reason for the liberals’ hatred beyond hatred. We already have told the classical liberals why the mad-dog liberals hate Donald Trump, but let’s go over it again.

Our modern liberals go back all the way to their father, who is Satan. Why does Satan hate God? He hates God because he wants to be God: “I shall not serve.” And Satan has instilled his desire to be as God into his followers, the liberals. After World War I there was still a remnant of Christian Europeans in the European nations, but the European governments were run by liberals, who were acting upon Thomas Paine’s faith, “My own mind is my church.” By the 21st century the liberals had a stranglehold on the European people, and they were getting closer, in their minds, to heaven on earth. Once the last non-illuminated whites, the Christians, were eliminated, paradise would be achieved. The 2016 election was only permitted because it was supposed to be a walk-over. The liberals told the American people that Trump was evil and Hillary was good. How could anyone who had been properly taught fail to vote the right way? But the impossible happened. The white grazers did not do as they were told, they voted for a white male who did not want to exterminate the white race. A heretic had become President! And he has been treated as a heretic who must be burnt, along with his followers, at the stake. Now, the liberals didn’t have to panic. They own the courts, they control Congress, and they control the fourth estate. Trump cannot really damage them. But they can’t control their hatred. That a public official, the highest public official in the country, has had the courage to include white people in his American dream is more than the liberals can stomach. And when you add the fact that Trump has tried to stop legalized abortion and has invoked the Christian God in his war against the coronavirus, you can see why Satan’s minions hate Trump.

I am not an American exceptionalist, I do not think America is a sacred city built on a hill. Nor am I a modern dispensational Christian. But I love Donald Trump for the moral courage he has shown in this crisis and in his ongoing war with the liberals and their Chinese communist allies. (1) This is not a time for an Olympian indifference to the onslaught against Trump, as if we are above the fray. If you are white and/or Christian, Trump is fighting for you and for me. I hate the conservative Olympians who attack Trump just as much as I hate the mad-dog liberals.

Even if the coronavirus plague dies out and Trump is reelected, the evil entity of liberalism will remain at the heart of our culture. There are too many liberals in the European nations, and there are too many white grazers devoid of a heartfelt faith in the liberals’ divine antagonist. We do not need more theologians and philosophers in order to restore the faith that we have lost, the faith that moves mountains. We need heroes, we need men such as Nathan Bedford Forrest:

The hero saves not only by his prowess; he saves by the divinity within himself. Indeed his prowess depends upon this divinity. The hero’s most perfect image is, of course, Christ the man-god. There is no hero unless the odds are overwhelming against the thing he stands for, or the rescue which takes him upon his quest. They are the powers of darkness; they show in the brutal weight of matter, the seemingly irresistible forces of mass. Since fear and desire make all of us tremble, the first quest of the hero is triumph over himself; and afterwards he follows the quest, a selfless and devoted individual on the way of becoming an archetype. Indeed because he is devoted, he is fearless. We do not know all the circumstance of Forrest’s triumph over himself. We know it only in his actions and because of one statement; he bought a one-way ticket to the war; that is, he had committed himself without reservation of goods or person. This is of the very quality of heroism, because it is a triumph over death. It is also the secret of his triumph over great odds. Never thinking of himself, he is free to think of the enemy; and so he finds the weakness which will topple all the weight and mass. There was never a greater half-truth than the statement that God is on the side of the biggest battalions. Moscow and Napoleon’s retreat stand for refutation of this.

– Andrew Lytle in Bedford Forrest and His Critter Company

There is a pathetic macho posturing that goes on among many of the conservative pundits. They vie with each other to prove that they, armed with statistics, can project the gloomiest outcome for whites. (2) They seem to take a particular delight in describing the hopeless state of the European people. But the European people’s state is only hopeless if you believe that history is determined by the “brutal weight of matter, the seemingly irresistible forces of mass.” I hear the statistics-men sneering, “Forrest lost!” Did he? When the war was over and the Jacobins descended upon the South like wolves licking their chops at the prospect of easy meals, the Southern people turned to Forrest. They asked him to rise and ride again, in their blackest hour. And he responded to their pleas. The Wizard of the Saddle became the head of an invisible army of confederate veterans who fought back against the forces of darkness, the “seemingly irresistible forces of mass.” He did not win a victory for all time, that is not possible on this earth, but he was victorious in that he saved, through his heroism, a people and a civilization that would have perished if he had taken an Olympian view of existence and bid his people take refuge in Plato and Aristotle. The God of Battles is Christ the Lord, because He bids us practice charity. Is it charitable to abandon your people in the name of an elevated philosophy or theology that has no room for individual human beings, the same human beings whom Christ died to save? We must stand against “the seemingly irresistible forces of mass,” because that “charity of honor” is what distinguishes a Christian European from the devil’s own, the liberals. We cannot remain philosophically distant from our people when the enemy has invaded our hearth fires.

She had not the heart to finish, but laid down the pen and pushed aside the ink-stand, the little bronze drum, which casual chance had saved from the wreck, with only a few of the gilt cords bent. She sat gazing at her fingers, as they lay on one of the other parts of the book, and beyond her fingers she saw the writing there. “November 29. We heard today of new orders in the town and that the Yankees had men on the roads coming this way. My husband was at Bayou Sara, where our plantation is falling to ruin, and we did not think it prudent to wait till he should return. We hastened to prepare for the coming soldiers. This was not easy, perched in this open field as Don’s Retreat is, and the negro quarters between us and the forest. We did what we could and waited, listening to the sound of negro voices mingled with the jangling of spurs and the clatter of sabres. I pictured to myself our former gardener Aleck, inflated with pride at his new dignity of corporal, coming in with insolence and insults demanding watches and money. This perpetually recurring dread and horror makes night a terror and life a torment. Oh, if we women and helpless old men and children were only where we might feel safe from negro insults, negro violence, and from the constant fear of these things! God help us – I look at the graves of our beloved ones and think with thankfulness of the rest which is theirs.”—New Year’s Eve, 1864—

She closed the book, already praying, her eyes fixed on the last embers of the fire, her whole body quiet with some strong force that made life dear to her—and believed that God saw in every heart its own sorrows.

-Stark Young, So Red the Rose

This coronavirus war is an extension of the American Civil War, which was an extension of Robespierre’s French Revolution. The French Jacobins, the Northern Jacobins, and our modern liberals were and are at war with the same enemy – white, European Christians. The coronavirus war has been successful because liberalism has gone deep into the vitals of the European people. The European people will not fight back against the liberals because they do not see that the liberals are totally evil with only one reason to live – to attack God by attacking His people. The theologically-minded clergy and the philosophically-oriented conservatives hope to avoid the wrath of the liberals by maintaining a Buddhistic distance from their people. But we, as Christians, cannot remain aloof. The divinity within, the grace of God, commands us to fight for our people in spite of the democratic aggregate of liberals arrayed against us.

If we lose elections, if there are no candidates who will stand up for white people, we need not despair. Why should we place our hopes in the democratic process which has never been good for white people? The liberals only use the democratic process when it serves their ends. Have they ever, for one moment, viewed Trump as their President who is fighting a virus that attacks all Americans? Of course they haven’t. At every turn, they oppose Trump. They have fought tooth and nail, and continue to fight, to limit the use of the hydroxychloroquine. They lie about the number of the dead, they lie about the possibility of ever opening up the country again, they continue to slavishly worship the Chinese communists and treat them as their bosom allies, and they continue to command European Americans to despair and die. They are the enemy, implacable, unyielding, and without mercy.

Trump’s electoral victory was the realization of the late Samuel Francis’s populist dream – to elect a white man who would represent white people as well as the colored races. That was also Tyndall’s desire in Britain. But what both populist leaders failed to come to terms with was the evil of liberalism, an evil so deeply rooted in the fabric of Western civilization that only a people whose hearts burned within them with the spirit of Christ crucified, Christ risen could effectively counter the evil of liberalism:

The result of Hardy’s management was that Tom made a clean breast of it, telling everything, down to his night at the ragged school, and what an effect his chance opening of the “Apology” had had on him. Here for the first time Hardy came in with his usual dry, keen voice, “You needn’t have gone so far back as Plato for that lesson.”

“I don’t understand,” said Tom.

“Well, there’s something about an indwelling spirit which guideth every man, in St. Paul, isn’t there?”

“Yes, a great deal,” Tom answered, after a pause; “but it isn’t the same thing.”

“Why not the same thing?”

“Oh, surely, you must feel it. It would be almost blasphemy in us now to talk as St. Paul talked. It is much easier to face the notion, or the fact, of a demon or spirit such as Socrates felt to be in him, than to face what St. Paul seems to be meaning.”

“Yes, much easier. The only question is whether we will be heathen or not.”

“How do you mean?” said Tom.

“Why, a spirit was speaking to Socrates, and guiding him. He obeyed the guidance, but knew not whence it came. A spirit is striving with us too, and trying to guide us–we feel that just as much as he did. Do we know what spirit it is? Whence it comes? Will we obey it? If we can’t name it—know no more of it then he knew about his demon, of course, we are in no better position than he–in fact, heathens.”

-Thomas Hughes, Tom Brown at Oxford

Trump’s victory was not a victory, because liberalism remains the ruling ethos of the European people. If we go back to Horowitz’s observation about the liberals’ maniacal opposition to every Trump initiative to ease the suffering of the American people during this coronavirus crisis, we can see the futility of placing our hopes in a material solution to a spiritual problem. The European people must be the Christ-bearing people. If they can’t be the Christ-bearing people because He does not dwell in their hearts, they will never be a people again. The counter-revolution will come when the theological and philosophical filth is cleared away – we cannot find God in the Olympian heights of our mind-forged systems, we must find Him in our hearts. That is the way of the cross, the way of our people when they were a people.

The French doctor Didier Raoult recently made an incredible, heartfelt critique of the “clinical” theory of medicine. He said that you cannot ignore the observations that a medical drug is curing people of an illness by claiming that the cure is not a reality until it is clinically proven to be a reality in a science laboratory. Hasn’t that clinical theory of the Catholic and Protestant scholastics been the cause of the spiritual sickness of the European people? The scholastics denied the ‘observational’ fact of Christian Europe that was built by people who followed St. Paul’s injunction to search the Scriptures with their heart, and bid us look instead to the men who had a purer intellectual vision of God, a God who was always in the abstracted reason of their minds, a God who had never made His presence known in one particular civilization. Where does such a clinical philosophy of God leave us? It leaves us naked to our enemies, the liberals, just as the clinical theory of medicine leaves us naked and defenseless against the coronavirus.

It looks like the death tolls of the liberal-communist virus will not, despite the liberals’ and the Chinese communists’ efforts, exceed the death tolls of the flu of 1917 or 1957, but the damage has been done. Many whites have lost their jobs — one of my sons is included in that hated white aggregate – and many people, white and colored, have lost their lives; it has become increasingly difficult for those of us who cannot “skin a buck and run a trout line,” to get food, and a general feeling of hopelessness and despair has settled into the hearts of the European grazers.(3) And men such as Didier Raoult and Donald Trump, who are trying to alleviate human suffering, are excoriated by the mad-dog liberals and the managerial conservatives who want to bring the whole world into the camp of the demon-possessed swine who are going over the cliff. We shall not go over the cliff with the swine if we face this crisis, and every crisis that the liberals send our way, with the faith of our Christian ancestors, the men and women who built a clinically unproven civilization grounded in the love of a clinically unproven Savior who was, is, and always shall be our only hope in this world and the next – our Jesus. +


(1) Trumps’s courage in severing our ties with the World Health Organization, which is in reality the Communist Chinese Department of War, makes him the greatest President the United States has ever had.

(2) “It’s romance,” said the professor.

“Very well. Then the point is: not what the colonel is, being Southern, but what he would be if he were not Southern.”

The professor regarded this remark as mere bombast. He had not been invited to Montrose, but had felt free to call because he was collecting statistics. Collecting statistics was already a new kind of entre. Nobody in the country had heard of statistics before, but the negroes were very much impressed. They welcomed investigation so heartily that what had at first seemed to the professor a gold mine of data began to irk him as excessively African detail, as communicative as it was imagined.

So Red the Rose

(3) After over one hundred years of damning everyone who advocates states’ rights, the liberals have now become states’ righters. The democratic governors have assumed dictatorial powers. They are openly defiant, declaring that they will not open up their states again no matter what the President says. The maniacally insane governor of Michigan has banned garden seeds, motorboats, and family gatherings. The liberals will not cease from mental strife until they have built hell on earth.

Posted in Christ, Jacobinism, Liberalism, Scientism | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Clinically Unproven


Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself. And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further. But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them. And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight. And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures? And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them, Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon. And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread. And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. –Luke 24: 25-36


A brilliant morning shines on the old city.  Its antiquities and ruins are surpassingly beautiful, with a lusty ivy gleaming in the sun, and the rich trees waving in the balmy air.  Changes of glorious light from moving boughs, songs of birds, scents from gardens, woods, and fields—or, rather, from the one great garden of the whole cultivated island in its yielding time—penetrate into the Cathedral, subdue its earthy odour, and preach the Resurrection and the Life.  The cold stone tombs of centuries ago grow warm; and flecks of brightness dart into the sternest marble corners of the building, fluttering there like wings. – The Mystery of Edwin Drood

I know very little about Mike Lindell, the “My Pillow Man” from Minnesota, but he did something that is never done in the public arena. He spoke the truth about the media: “This is evil.” If the European people had said that about all of the French Jacobins, not just the Robespierre Jacobins, and then acted upon that insight, there would not have been a communist revolution in Russia in 1917, and there would not have been a coronavirus revolution in 2020.

Our decline as a people has come about because we have lost the ability to distinguish between good and evil. It is an extraordinary thing, now that the liberals have shown themselves to be completely evil, without any trace of humanity:  the white grazers seem unable to see the liberals’ for what they are. They are satanic, devoid of all the attributes the European people once considered the mark of a human being. It was once considered noble and honorable to love your own people, to practice charity and mercy, and to honor, revere, and love the Savior, Jesus Christ. Now it is considered just and good to hate your own people, to be devoid of charity and mercy, and to denigrate our Holy Savior. And that is really what is behind the weakness of the West in the face of the Chinese communists’ assault on the European nations. Our people are dying of the virus, and the liberals, who are one with the Chinese communists in their hatred of all things European, are maniacally resisting all the efforts of anyone — that French doctor Dr. Didier Raoult is an example – trying to help victims of the virus and give the Europeans hope that the virus does not have to become another Black Plague. But of course the liberals want another Black Plague, because the raison d’être of the post-Christian European, the liberal, is the hatred of the people who once were the Christ-bearing race. Such people must be eliminated because they might revert and take up the discarded burden, the cross of Christ, of their ancestors.

Thomas Paine spoke for all liberals, past and present, when he said:

Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant to reason, and more contradictory to itself, than this thing called Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only atheists and fanatics.

If we say an atheist is someone who does not believe in a God, then no man is an atheist. Paine believed in a false God, he believed in his own abstract intellect, the noble savages, and science. And so did his idol Robespierre, and so do all our modern liberals believe in the triune God of Thomas Paine. But if we say that all those who do not believe in the living God, Jesus Christ, are atheists, then we see before us an army of militant atheists totally committed to whatever is diametrically opposed to what Paine called the most “repugnant” of religions. And what does Paine suggest as an alternative to our ancient faith in the God-Man? He suggests the second oldest faith, a faith in our own minds:

I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my church.

That is the credo of all liberals, the deification of man’s original sin, which the liberals do not believe in, the pride of intellect. So long as liberalism is the ruling doctrine of the European people, we will continue to remain in fetters, subject to whatever evil the liberals decide to thrust upon us. In Paine’s day the purge took place via the guillotine, and right now in 2020, it is the coronavirus purge. We must see the connection. Just as Paine called the slaughtered aristocrats, “so few sacrifices, for the greater good,” so do our modern liberals, who vehemently oppose the use of any drug that might reduce the death toll of the coronavirus, feel that a “few sacrifices” are necessary in order to destroy Trump and move all mankind, minus the white race, closer to utopia.

A doctor, who was interviewed by Laura Ingraham about successfully treating coronavirus patients with the chloroquine drug, asked why there was such hostility to a drug that was helping people. Why indeed? The answer is rooted in the debate between Paine and Burke. In Paine’s Rights of Man he castigated Burke for impeding the building of utopia by his concern for just a “few sacrifices,” who were undeserving of life in the brave new world. So it is today. A few sacrifices are necessary so that the liberal utopia, which is always in the future and never quite materializes in the present, can come to fruition. Paine lost his debate with Burke. Melville’s Billy Budd is an attack on Paine and his Rights of Man, and such poets as Wordsworth and Coleridge, after their initial enthusiasm for the French Revolution, turned on the revolution and sided with Burke. Such men turned on the French Revolution and its defenders because they came to see what Burke saw – the French Revolution was a satanic assault on Christian Europe. There can be no middle ground between Satan and Christ. We either worship our own minds, which can be easily manipulated by Satan’s superior mind, or we can give our hearts to Christ and venture forth, armed with the grace of God, in opposition to Satan and his minions.

The devil must, like our Lord, work through humanity. He can inflame men with his own satanic will, he can create a satanic tempest, but he cannot control the results. The grace of God working in human hearts is an ever present challenge to Satan. The satanically inspired liberal is always working for the destruction of all things Christian. But throughout our history, the liberals have chosen to subvert by subtle lies, by perversions of the truth, rather than by outright attacks on Christ and His people. The Robespierre French Revolution, the American Civil War, the Russian Revolution are exceptions to the general modus operandi of the liberals. Those revolutions were naked-fist revolutions; there was nothing subtle about them. And now this present revolution, this communist-inspired revolution (which is the same as liberal-inspired, they are all part of the same ideological package) is a naked-fist attack on the white race. The liberals have destroyed the economies of the white nations, they have taken many white lives, but will this new naked-fist revolution advance liberalism? I’d like to say there will be a Burkean reaction, but I cannot say with any certainty that the white grazers, when they see that the liberals are working with might and main to increase the death tolls, to create economic chaos and to increase human suffering, will turn from liberalism in order to embrace His Europe.

The President of Brazil has issued the chloroquine drug to his people in defiance of the liberals (he uses the term ‘cultural Marxists’). And the good doctors, those who still believe that a doctor should attempt to heal the sick, are issuing the drug to their patients. What are the liberals doing?  They are attacking anyone who suggests the drug can cure the disease and they are attacking anyone who suggests that the disease has anything to do with Communist China. And what are the liberals’ spiritual brethren, the Chinese communists, doing with their coronavirus victims? They are burning them alive. Is not the spiritual metaphor obvious? The liberals’ crusade against anything that reduces human suffering during this crisis and their alliance with the satanic Chinese communists reveals their spiritual essence. They hate Christ, who is our hope in this world and the next, and they have formed an alliance with Satan in order to kill that hope within us.

It is Easter, Christ has risen! Indeed He has! Our faith in His resurrection from the dead and His assurance that He will be with us alway, even unto the ending of the world, will sustain us during this current onslaught of the devil and his liberal minions. It is not a little thing, it is everything, that Christ has given us His word that He, and not the devil, shall prevail. The old hymn enjoins us to be faithful in spite of dungeon, fire, and sword. Let us add, “in spite of the liberals’ coronavirus” to that list. Our Lord “suffered these things” so that we might have eternal life. Nothing can alter that: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day.” +

Posted in Christ, Christian religion, Grazers, Resurrection | Tagged , | Comments Off on Emmaus

St. Paul and Anders

And many that believed came, and confessed, and shewed their deeds. Many of them also which used curious arts brought their books together, and burned them before all men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand pieces of silver. So mightily grew the word of God and prevailed. 

– Acts 19: 18-20


“But surely you would like to change caps with me,” said the king, and he lifted his shining gold crown from his head.

Anders said never a word but when the king came nearer to him with his gold crown in one hand, and the other outstretched toward that beautiful cap, then, with one jump, Anders was out of his chair. Like an arrow he darted out of the hall, through the palace, down the stairs, and across the yard. He ran so fast that the necklace the princess had given him fell from his neck, and all the cakes rolled out of his pockets.

But he had his cap! He had his cap! He had his cap! With both hands he clutched it tight as he ran back home to his mother’s cottage. 

– “The Cap that Mother Made” (a Swedish tale)


The Swedes recently announced that they were going to follow the Italian model in dealing with the coronavirus. Illegal immigrants of color will receive treatment while old white folks will be placed on the ‘deplorable’ list and left alone to die. This is not really a new policy in the European nations. My father, a veteran of the ‘Big War,’ which the liberals always claim as ‘their’ war because it was against Hitler, was neglected in favor of the colored illegals when he entered the hospital in his last days. And what is wrong with such a policy? Isn’t it practical to let the old white people die off and try to save the people of color, who are the noble savages? Yes, it is practical if you are trying to build a new world, free of white Europeans and their God.

The liberal-created coronavirus crisis has given the white grazers, if they have eyes to see, a rare glimpse behind the liberal curtain. What we see behind the curtain is the liberal expert. In the name of his scientific expertise – in religion, medicine, politics, and in every other aspect of our lives – the liberals bid us trust the expert. But the expert is in reality the Emperor who has no clothes. His expertise is a lie. That is what we can see so clearly during this coronavirus outbreak as the liberals’ experts predict 7 million deaths in the U.S. while simultaneously forbidding the use of the chloroquine drug, which has not been “clinically proven”; it has only been proven “observationally” as a cure for coronavirus. And if it is not “clinically proven” by an expert, it is not a reality. So it is in the liberals’ brave new world. That which is not liberal cannot be. Reality is false, and the liberals’ lies are true. (1)

The first liberal expert, the expert who spawned the legions of liberal experts throughout our history as a people, was Satan. Satan told Adam and Eve they would not die if they ate the forbidden fruit. And he made that claim based on his scientific expertise. He knew the natural world better than God. How could a delicious fruit produce death? But of course Satan, like all liberal experts, had a hidden agenda. He hated God and he sought to strike out at God by attacking his creatures. And that has always been and always will be the case with the liberals. Through the scientific expert they attack God and humanity.

The European people’s inordinate respect for and fear of the experts in religion, medicine, law, and politics stems from the original sin of Adam and Eve, who were deceived by Satan, the religious expert, who offered them equality with God. Christ faced religious experts when He stood before Caiaphas. How could the son of a carpenter, a non-expert, challenge the combined expertise of the Sanhedrin? It was blasphemous. So the experts sentenced the Word made flesh, our Lord and Savior, to death.

As it was with our Savior so it was with His greatest champion, St. Paul. St. Paul stood before the Jewish religious experts and the Athenian philosophical experts and preached Christ crucified, Christ risen, without any respect for the Jews who rejected their own prophets and the philosophers who would not acknowledge a God with a local habitation and a name. What is so striking about St. Paul’s Christian faith is that he does not see Christ as a stepping stone to a higher faith. For him the grace of God of is everything: “Through Christ and in Christ.” Is not that in keeping with the words of our Lord in the Revelation of St. John? “I am the beginning and the end.” Teilhard de Chardin was not an aberration, he merely made explicit what was implicit in the theological approach to God, which enjoins us to believe that the religious expert has something to tell us that is greater than the provincial God championed by St. Paul. In theological Christianity, we are not enjoined to take Christ into our heart; instead we are enjoined to partake of the wisdom of the religious experts. But the religious experts are juggling fiends who will steal our souls, “with honest trifles, to betray’s in deepest consequence.” They will leave us, if we believe in their expertise, bereft of a heart that loves, which is our only way to the Savior whose divine love surpasseth the understanding of the experts.

The coronavirus revolution is another outbreak of Robespierre Jacobinism, just as the communist uprising in Russia was an outbreak of Robespierre Jacobinism. Such outbreaks occur when the liberals feel that the construction of their utopian society, which necessitates the destruction of all things Christian, is proceeding too slowly. And the revolutionary purges are always arranged by metaphysical experts devoid of all humanity:

Nothing can be conceived more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician. It comes nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man. It is like that of the principle of evil himself, incorporeal, pure, unmixed, dephlegmated, defecated evil.

Edmund Burke

“The frailty and passion of a man.” Our weakness is our humanity, but it is also, through Him and in Him, our strength. If we admit our frailty, our dependence on the Suffering Servant, He will grant us the grace to set our passionate love against the passionate hatred of the devil and his liberal experts. And in that battle the passionate European shall bear it away.

True conservatism, Burkean conservatism, does not consist of the support of a system in religion or politics. It consists of St. Paul’s vision of Christ as the Beginning and the End. If we do not see Christ as a stepping stone to a larger cosmic vision of God, if He remains the Word made flesh, who was born in a stable in Bethlehem, crucified under Pontius Pilate, and rose from the dead on the third day, He will be the God of the little things, the God of our hearth fires and our hearts. We will support His channels of grace, because His grace is our salvation. But when the cosmic Christ becomes our Lord, when we worship a new Athenian vision of God that satisfies the egotism of the theologians who want to be the first to give us a new improved theology of God, then we lose God and we lose the civilization of the men and women who asked the dear Christ to enter into their hearts.

The liberals have managed to get the European people to kneel to their false gods because the theologically minded churchmen have not taken Christ into their hearts. Without a heartfelt faith of their own they cannot present the real Christ to their people. They are like unto the vagabond Jewish exorcists in Acts, who thought they could use Christ’s name to fight the demons without having first taken Christ into their hearts:

Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon them to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth. And there were seven sons of one Sceva, a Jew, and chief of the priests, which did so. And the evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye? And the man in whom the evil spirit was leaped on them, and overcame them, and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded.Acts 19: 13-16

If we attack the demon-possessed liberals with the pseudo-Christianity of the churchmen and/or the pseudo-conservatism of the system-dependent conservatives, we will have to flee our house naked and wounded.

It became glaringly apparent in The Merchant of Venice that Shylock had plotted Antonio’s death beforehand when he refused thrice the money of the original bond. Shylock wanted his pound of flesh and nothing else. So it is with the liberals. When a French doctor has found a cure for coronavirus which the liberals refuse to even consider, some states have even banned the chloroquine drug as a treatment because Trump recommends it and because the doctor who prescribes it does not believe in the liberals’ doctrine of climate change, then we can see that the liberals have a satanic plan that is all and all to them. There must be a crisis that permits liberal experts to run every aspect of our lives. There must be such a crisis because white, Christian Europeans must be eradicated from the face of the earth. That is what liberalism is all about, Charlie Brown, and you too, Charlie Brown, will have to be exterminated.

Theologians know nothing about God, because the living God comes to us through the wellspring of the human heart, not through the abstract intellect. Doctors have a certain technical skill, but they know nothing about spiritual or physical health. If they have a connection to the other world, Christian Europe, they can be of some use, but outside of that world they serve Satan. And what of the lawyers? They become like unto the archenemies of Christ in the Gospels when they use the letter of the law to destroy the spirit of the law. Should such ‘experts’ be our guides? To what end? Are they not guiding us off a cliff?

If we go back to the original expert in the Garden of Eden we can see what unifies all the modern experts of Liberaldom: They hate the living God because He offends their pride. They must be as gods, so they attack the living God through His people. The Europeans once were His people, so the liberals have centered their attack on the Europeans. But the noble savages of color can only remain the liberals’ gods so long as they stay outside of the orbit of Christian Europe; it is always that entity which is under attack. The theologians attack Christian Europe by pointing out the insufficiencies, from their utopian heights, of the antique Europeans. And the secular liberals attack the antique Europeans precisely because they were Christian. Thus the pride of intellect unites the religious expert and the secular expert in one great hatred, the hatred of Christ and the people who once called on Him by name.

The Swedes have not deviated from what has become the mainstream morality of the European governments. They are simply being more explicit – “The young must die in their mothers’ wombs and the old whites must die quickly to make way for the non-whites.” That is now the anti-white, anti-Christian ethos that rules Europe. Let me posit a different ethos, an old ethos, as an alternative. In an old Swedish fairy tale a young boy named Anders is given a hat by his mother: “A prettier cap was never seen, for his mother herself had knit it; and who could ever make anything half so nice as mother!” Throughout the rest of the story Anders is offered money, kisses from a beautiful princess, and bigger and finer hats, if only he will relinquish the hat his mother made for him. Anders refuses to give up the hat, even when his own brother calls him a fool for his many refusals. And in the end –

Anders’ face grew red, very red. “I was not foolish,” he answered sturdily, “I could never have bought a finer cap, not for all the king’s crown. I could never have bought anything in all this world one half so fine as the cap my mother made me!”

Then his mother took him up on her lap, and kissed him.

We are to Christian Europe and to our Lord as Anders was to his hat and to his mother. There is no finer place for us than Christian Europe, because that is where our kith and kin and our Lord dwell. The land of the experts, the land of Liberaldom, is not, and never shall be, our home. +


(1) Laura Ingraham tried to report on the benefits of the chloroquine drug, but she was locked out of her Twitter account because of her deviation from the liberals’ party line, which is: “There is no cure, there is no hope, you must cease all work, all of life, and stay in your homes until the experts tell you it is safe to come out.” That date, the date when it will be safe to come out, will always be in the future; it will never come about in reality, just like the liberals’ utopia.

Posted in Fairy tale mode of understanding, Pride of intellect, Scientism | Tagged , | Comments Off on St. Paul and Anders

The Pestilence That Walketh in Darkness

Because he hath set his love upon me, therefore will I deliver him: I will set him on high, because he hath known my name. – Psalm 91: 14


Life is inherently tragic because we are mortal men who must die, yet we have intimations of immortality. But life becomes even more tragic when those in authority, the principalities and powers of this world, work to destroy the unbought grace of life. Such is the case in Shakespeare’s King Lear, when Lear turns his kingdom over to his evil daughters, and such is the case in the modern European nations ruled by the minions of Satan, who make Lady Macbeth, Goneril, and Regan seem like mild lambs in comparison.

This coronavirus crisis was born in the war laboratories of the Chinese communists, and it is being spread by their liberal allies in the Western nations. To oppose the spread of the virus by restricting travel to China or to suggest any kind of restrictions on immigration is to oppose all that is liberal and ‘good.’ It will not be permitted. What is there left to discover about the liberals? They, like Smerdyakov in the Brothers Karamazov, believe there is no God outside of their own intellects. So everything is lawful if they desire it. And what they desire is the destruction of everything good, noble, and honorable. Every remnant of that which was our glory, our hope, and our comfort, Christian Europe, must be destroyed. This latest liberal assault, the coronavirus crisis, has been a very, very successful gambit. It has destroyed small white businesses and further isolated whites from each other, making them even more dependent on the federal and state governments. Right now the crisis appears to have no end in sight, because the Democrats in the U.S. Congress are resisting any financial or medical aid bills unless they include all sorts of liberal agenda items, such as more funding for abortion, in the bills. And in Britain and Canada, the powers that be refuse to place any restrictions on foreign trade and travel, even in the face of an ever-widening circle of disease. The liberals are the demon-possessed swine, and they are determined to take thee and me over the cliff with them. They might get their way in terms of ‘this world only’ – they might get our bodies – but will we save our souls? “That,” as Hamlet says, “is the question.”

The liberals have no differences with the Chinese communists because they are of one accord with the Chinese communists. N. G. Chernyshevsky’s book, What Is to Be Done, was studied by Lenin, who sought to put the principles described in the book into practice when he became head of communist Russia. Chernyshevsky asserted there was no essential difference between a plant, a mineral, an animal, or a man. Any view contrary to his view was part of the “prescientific era” and was self-evidently false. After placing man on the level of a vegetable, Chernyshevsky then goes on to tell us how reason, man’s reason, unfettered by the unscientific Europeans, will build a paradise on earth. Can mere vegetable and mineral matter really build a heaven on earth? And if that could be done, how can minerals and vegetables enjoy themselves? But Chernyshevsky’s ‘scientific’ viewpoint has become the liberals’ viewpoint, and it remains unchallenged in the Western world. Certain logical consequences of that viewpoint are rejected by more conservative-minded liberals, but the scientific determinism of the modern liberal-communist ruling elites is never challenged.

The liberals have taken Chernyshevsky’s vision of man into the 21st century. And they have forged that vision, which is really a vision of the unmen, into a fighting faith that has no room for the God who took flesh and dwelt among us. How can there be a place for Christ within the confines of an ideology that says we are created in the image of vegetable matter?

The coronavirus crisis is the liberals’ payback for Trump’s election. The white grazers, by voting for Trump, revealed they did not want to go quietly into the night, they wanted to be part of Liberaldom. That was not acceptable to the liberals, because white people represent the unscientific era of man’s history, the era when men did not realize they were vegetables. You cannot take people with such an unscientific past into the future. Even if the white grazer repudiates his past, which tragically he has, the white grazer will not be allowed into the future. He cannot be trusted to annihilate himself, so the liberals have been forced to step up the annihilation process. Won’t many of the liberals be destroyed by the virus as well? Yes, some will. But the liberals do not care about their fellow liberals either; they have no genuine feelings for anything human. They have progressed beyond humanity, to the higher scientific phase of the unmen, that of creatures who have no humanity.

Even if the death tolls of the coronavirus do not reach the levels the liberals hope for, the crisis has been a liberal success. The liberals have destroyed many small, white, independent businesses, and they have shown the white grazers their power. (1) Oppression works, particularly when the people who are being oppressed have no strong faith to sustain them against their oppressors and inspire them to launch a counterattack. That has been and continues to be the subject of these wars. The white grazers have no love or respect for the liberals, but they do fear them. And without a strong faith, they will not be able to overcome their fear of the liberals. They will appease them in all things in the hope that the liberals will withhold their wrath. It won’t work – it never has and it never will. Liberalism is from the devil, and the devil cannot be appeased; he hates humanity and the God who loves humanity. “There shall be no mercy,” is the devil’s credo, and it is the credo of his liberal minions.

When Burke wrote his anti-Jacobin salvo, he managed to persuade many of the European intelligentsia to condemn the Robespierre Jacobins. Only a small remnant, men such as Kingsley and Price, and later, Hilaire Belloc, remained Robespierre Jacobins. But Burke was never able to convince the European intelligentsia that the Jacobin ethos would remain in Europe so long as democracy was the new ‘God word’ throughout Europe.

Dostoyevsky also warned the West of the dangers of Jacobinism in its Marxist guise. He had less success than Burke — there were very few members of the European intelligentsia who were willing to condemn communism when it reared its satanic head in Russia. It was always the Czar and Christian Russia that were attacked. And right up to the 21st century, the first century since the Europeans first committed themselves to Christ that has begun under the auspices of a religion opposed to Christ, the liberals have always considered the communists their brethren while they view all those who oppose the communists as their enemies. And they are right, not morally right, but right in that they know their spiritual counterparts. They all believe as Chernyshevsky believed: “Blessed be the unmen, who are no different from vegetables, minerals, or animals. Blessed be our abstract reason, which shall lead us to paradise, when the unscientific Christians have been purged from the face of the earth.”

I hold with Pastor Grundtvig, the great Danish poet, who said that any theologian, be he Protestant or Catholic, who emphasizes man’s sinful nature to the exclusion of what is within man that bears the image of God, is from the devil. If you deny that there is anything worthy of redemption in man after the Fall, you denigrate Christ, you make His incarnation and subsequent crucifixion and resurrection from the dead a mockery, because Christ saw men as worthy of redemption. He loved us. I have heard the ‘hard guy’ theologians speak, and I cannot see any difference between the religious ‘hard guys’ and Chernyshevsky. Man becomes mere vegetable matter in both ideologies, and abstract reason, illogically divorced from sinful man, becomes all in all. If we are governed, in church or state, by illuminated minds detached from the human heart, we will always be viewed as vegetable matter, easily disposed of, without any regard for such unscientific concepts as mercy and love.

When I look at the food lines and the deserted streets of our new coronavirus-afflicted world, I can draw only one conclusion: The liberals have made the transition from a war of persuasion to a war of destruction. They are forcing the white grazers to submit to liberal authority through sheer force, the force of germ warfare. This war was inevitable once we left Christ out of the European drama. If charity and mercy, His charity and mercy, are unscientific, then, “Humanity must perforce prey upon itself like monsters from the deep.”

Monsters indeed! Yeats asked “What rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?” It will not be the benign, intellectual paganism that Yeats hoped for. It will be the real beast, it will be Satan. The fruits of liberalism are before us. The liberals’ brain child is mankind’s ancient foe. The coronavirus germ warfare is just one more onslaught of the devil. We must think in terms of the Psalmist:

He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust.
Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.
He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler.
Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.
A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee.
Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see the reward of the wicked.
Because thou hast made the LORD, which is my refuge, even the most High, thy habitation;
There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.
For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways.
They shall bear thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot against a stone.
Thou shalt tread upon the lion and adder: the young lion and the dragon shalt thou trample under feet.
Because he hath set his love upon me, therefore will I deliver him: I will set him on high, because he hath known my name.

That psalm has always been a source of strength to the Christian Europeans. But it is so unscientific, and haven’t Christians throughout the centuries cited that psalm in vain? Haven’t they died from the arrows that flieth by day and the pestilence that walketh in darkness? Yes, they have. Still there is that vision of Christ on the Cross. He loves us and the liberals do not. To whom then do we turn?

“None but thee, Lord, none but thee.”+


(1) It is the ‘democratic’ governors who are closing down white businesses by imperial fiat. Many of those businesses employ white males who are living paycheck to paycheck. They do not live on welfare checks nor do they make a living by robbing and stealing. They need to work. And most of the work they do does not put them at risk for the coronavirus. But thus far they have not been able to persuade their governors to let them work. Why? Because the coronavirus has allowed the liberals to govern us as Chernyshevsky wanted vegetables and minerals to be governed. “You bid me seek redemption from the devil,” Isabella tells the Duke in Measure for Measure. And so do we ask redemption from the devil when we seek for mercy and fair-dealing from our liberal overlords.

Posted in Charity, Christ, Democracy, Grazers, Religion of Satan | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Pestilence That Walketh in Darkness

Our Hope in Ages Past

These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world. –John 16: 33


Let me start with some observations on the coronavirus crisis. First, Trump did try to do something to prevent the spread of the virus. On January 30, he instituted a ban on travel to and from China. What happened immediately afterwards? Biden said Trump’s decision was, “hysterical xenophobia … and fear-mongering,” exaggerating the danger of the virus and picking on the nice, benevolent Chinese communists. Yet now Biden tells us that he and his liberal cohorts are the people who should lead us out of the crisis. If we follow the timeline, we can see that as the coronavirus was spreading, the Democrats were so busy trying to impeach Trump that they had no time to spend on the problem of the coronavirus. They are people with one priority, the same priority as the demons who went over the cliff with the swine.

Secondly, I have no desire to get the virus, nor do I want any of my family members to get the virus. I don’t think the disease is a particularly funny topic, but humor, of the right kind, can be a catharsis. I highly recommend a music video that my daughter played for me by a country singer named Buddy Brown. He did us all a service by allowing us to laugh at the virus. The video is a kind of exorcism.

Now, back to a more sober aspect of the coronavirus crisis. What the crisis drives home to me is the fact that there is no Christian presence left in the liberal elites of the European nations. When the Italians just leave their elderly who are infected with the virus to die without medical treatment, because it is not cost-effective to treat them, and when politicians such as Biden cannot put partisan politics aside and rally around a leader who is trying to reduce the suffering of his people, you can see past the thin veil of the liberals’ feigned humanity to their satanic core. The liberals who love to pontificate about their concern for humanity, and Pope Francis is one of the worst of the liberals, actually hate individual human beings. The ‘open borders’ Pope does not care about the people who are being and will be destroyed by open borders. He and his liberal cohorts in crime only care about the sign of their election — they are the intelligent ones who have gone beyond the boundaries of fear, prejudice, and superstition. They are not prejudiced against Orientals, blacks, or any other stranger; the only danger in their eyes are white people who believe that the European people should have a homeland that is theirs and theirs alone.

Will this crisis change the liberals’ views on open borders and diversity? No, it won’t. The liberals have committed themselves to a new religion, a religion without mercy, without love, and without that charity of honor. Such creatures must always support that which is opposed to Christ’s reign of charity. And Christ’s reign of charity begins in a non-diverse home and extends to a non-diverse village and nation. Have we ever seen a diverse Christian nation? No, we have not. Diversity dilutes love. In order to truly love, we must love with an intensity and passion greater than the generic love of the liberal purveyors of diversity. We must love much, we must love our Lord, and we must love our people in and through our Savior. Is it just a coincidence that the greatest proponent of diversified love, Francis the blasphemer, resides in a nation that has treated the coronavirus victims just as inhumanely as communist China has treated her victims? Quite probably it is a coincidence, but it is not a coincidence that the new religion of diversity, the religion of diversified love, is a religion with no room for the one particular God of love or for the people who once championed that God of love.

What about the white grazers? Will this coronavirus crisis shake their faith in the liberal elite? My anecdotal evidence, which I have gathered while standing in grocery store lines caused by the liberals’ cries of “panic, panic, doom, doom!” is that the grazers no longer believe in the liberal elite. That doesn’t mean they believe in Walter Scott’s Christian Europe, but they no longer believe that the liberals, represented by the liberal news media and the Democratic Party, are the people to turn to in a crisis. They do not believe the Democrats’ spin, “It is Trumps’ fault.” They believe this is a crisis caused by the Democrats and perpetuated by the media. Does that mean the white grazers are poised to reject liberalism? No, it does not. It simply means that the white grazers are in limbo; they are uncertain about the future, or should I say their future, but they still believe that intelligent people do not believe in the poetic of old Europe, and that is a tragedy. The European grazers are still not ready to answer Dostoevsky’s question, “Can an intelligent man, a European, believe in the divinity of Christ,” with an unequivocal, “Yes.” Man’s first fall from grace was grounded in the pride of intellect – the devil told Adam and Eve they were too intelligent to believe that eating from the tree of the forbidden fruit would kill them. And the Europeans’ second fall from grace was grounded in the pride of intellect as well: “We are too intelligent to believe in the fairy tale of Christ’s birth, crucifixion, and resurrection from the dead.” Thus the fear of being thought stupid, of being unscientific, doth make practical atheists of the European people. They are too intelligent to leave Liberaldom, despite the fact that Liberaldom is becoming increasingly uncomfortable for them, because they do not want to be numbered among the stupid people who are, according to the liberals, surely damned. But didn’t our Lord, before He left this earth, warn us that the liberals, the creatures of ‘this world only,’ would hate us?

These things I command you, that ye love one another. If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.John 15: 17

Dickens asks, in Great Expectations, why human beings always seek the respect of the people they most despise. Why indeed? Isn’t the answer to that question rooted in our pride of intellect? And isn’t our conquest of that pride our salvation? We can’t love much and be forgiven if we are too smart to kneel before His Holy Cross and ask for His forgiveness. The devils in Matthew 8 sought to escape from Christ, so they asked to enter the swine, which promptly went headlong over the cliff. The liberals are devils; they are determined to go over the cliff with the swine. If the European grazers will not divorce themselves from the liberal devils, they too will go over the cliff with the demon-possessed liberal swine.

Irwin Cobb, author of the marvelous Judge Priest stories that describe, with humor and love, the people of the old South in the era just after the Civil War, wrote a very telling remark about the Gospel of Christ in his autobiography. He said the Gospel was a sublime book, but it was impractical to live your life by it. That has been, and continues to be, the attitude of the conservatives in church and state. They give a nod to Christianity the religion, and then they return to the Greek philosophers, to abstract reason, when they want to “solve” the problems of life. But the one great problem of life cannot be solved by the philosophers, the purveyors of abstract reason: We must die. That is what makes the problem of life insoluble. Sophocles’ indictment of the philosophers is correct: “Better never to have been born,” if there is no Redeemer. To live outside of His love is pure hell. The wisdom of the worldly-minded conservatives is that we should live with their wisdom, the philosophers, in this world, and then at the hour of our death we should call on Him. But that type of philosophy undercuts the Gospel of Christ and Christ’s personally anointed spokesman, St. Paul. “Through Christ and in Christ,” was St. Paul’s passionate response to the problem of life on this earth. St. Paul saw that Christ stood alone before the terrible horror of death, and He did not waver in His faith, because He and His father were one. It is “practical” to live “through Christ and in Christ,” on this earth. It is the only practical course to follow.

St. Stephen seemed impractical; it was sheer folly to defy the rulers of the synagogue, wasn’t it? Well, he did die, but he was given a vision of the risen Lord: “I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing on the right hand of God.” The liberals have not eliminated the tragedy of life, they have increased the suffering in this world one thousand-fold because they have “pragmatized” the care of the elderly, the infirm, and the children in the womb: They kill them, because it is practical. And they have left us spiritually bereft of our Comforter, the Holy Ghost, who bids us turn to Him in life and death.

I have a cousin, a mad-dog liberal, who works with people who are at death’s door. Over her lifetime in that profession she has observed that people with faith are much better off in the face of death than those without faith, but that observation has not given her faith in Christ, because she is “too smart” to believe in fairy tales. You cannot become a Christian for practical reasons. You must feel that Christ is in you and you are in Him. The connection between our kith and kin and our God, which the Dream of the Rood poet and William Shakespeare in “Sonnet 31” speak of is something that we have lost as a people. Eric Voegelin, the Platonist, is referenced in conservative anthologies a thousand times more than St. Paul. But there is a wisdom of the heart, the circumcised heart, that tells us to listen to our blood. If we go back, if we join with our European ancestors, in spirit and blood, we will be one with them and with Him.

As I stated at the outset, I do not want to contract the coronavirus. I am not going to stand at the dock as the cruise ships come in and embrace coronavirus-infected Jewish millionaires as they leave the cruise ship. Nor do I want my family members, my friends, or even the liberals to contract the coronavirus. But in the end, whether it is the coronavirus or some other illness that gets us, we are going to die. So the larger question is – are we going to die in Christ’s loving embrace or are we going to die within the satanic embrace of liberalism? The most serious illness of all is the one that kills the soul as well as the body. And that illness is liberalism. The coronavirus is being trumpeted as something more that it is, a flu, because of the satanic nature of the liberals. Everything must be used for the destruction of His reign of charity. When the coronavirus dies out, there will be other plagues that the liberals will use to try and make us turn our souls over to them in exchange for a plague-free existence. Don’t believe them. They are the plague we should worry about, and His people, the people of old Europe, knew the antidote for that plague: “In Him and through Him. +

Posted in Charity, Christ, Liberalism, Pride of intellect, Religion of Satan | Tagged , , | Leave a comment