UPDATE September 17, 2021: Six more posts have been republished this week, listed below. In addition, readers can quickly access all republished posts to date by clicking on the new category Older posts (pre-April 2019).
You are probably aware of a gap in Cambria Will Not Yield’s blog posts from the year 2012 to the year 2019; this was due to the constant efforts of Liberaldom to take his blog down completely. Even though he valiantly brought it back in 2019, he had not found the time to republish his old posts; he was so busy with each of his new ones. However, it is the fervent hope and desire of his family to republish all of these suppressed posts as soon as possible on this blog. We plan to first publish the missing 40 posts not available on Internet Archive, and then publish the remainder of the suppressed posts, in their correct chronological order.
May they guide and strengthen you on your way; they were written for this purpose: May they help bring you to Christ, the King and Lord of heroes. Cambria will not yield!
Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die.
To the faithful in Christ who have followed Cambria Will Not Yield, we, his family, must tell you that the greatest man of our time has received his reward: Cambria Will Not Yield has left this world and gone to Christ’s kingdom. Some of you may know this already; Shotgun Barrel Straight has posted a video on his blog in honor of Mr. Cambria, spoken from the heart which is thankfully received in our hearts, let us tell him. Thank you, Shotgun Barrel Straight; so many of your words are ours. You are right; there just does not seem to be any appropriate words to say, to express what this means to so many of us, to describe the man, the poet, the soldier, that Cambria Will Not Yield was.
He was a burning and a shining light in this land of darkness. What can we say in memoriam of him? How can we, his family, do better than to keep his blog up as long as we can for all to see and read? And how can we all do better than to take his words to our hearts and live for Christ and His people? His own writings stand as the best memorial; in them you can read of his entire life-long war for Jesus Christ and His people against Satan and his followers, battle by battle, for each article he wrote with his heart’s blood. His passing was sudden; our Lord must have needed him right away to carry on the good fight elsewhere, just as a soldier in war is transferred, for he was and is Christ’s soldier always.
Arthur paused a moment, and then said quickly, “I’ll tell you how it all happened. At first, when I was sent to the sick-room, and found I had really got the fever, I was terribly frightened. I thought I should die, and I could not face it for a moment. I don’t think it was sheer cowardice at first, but I thought how hard it was to be taken away from my mother and sisters and you all, just as I was beginning to see my way to many things, and to feel that I might be a man and do a man’s work. To die without having fought, and worked, and given one’s life away, was too hard to bear. I got terribly impatient, and accused God of injustice, and strove to justify myself. And the harder I strove the deeper I sank. Then the image of my dear father often came across me, but I turned from it. Whenever it came, a heavy, numbing throb seemed to take hold of my heart, and say, ‘Dead-dead-dead.’ And I cried out, ‘The living, the living shall praise Thee, O God; the dead cannot praise thee. There is no work in the grave; in the night no man can work. But I can work. I can do great things. I will do great things. Why wilt thou slay me?’ And so I struggled and plunged, deeper and deeper, and went down into a living black tomb. I was alone there, with no power to stir or think; alone with myself; beyond the reach of all human fellowship; beyond Christ’s reach, I thought, in my nightmare. You, who are brave and bright and strong, can have no idea of that agony. Pray to God you never may. Pray as for your life.”
Arthur stopped—from exhaustion, Tom thought; but what between his fear lest Arthur should hurt himself, his awe, and his longing for him to go on, he couldn’t ask, or stir to help him.
Presently he went on, but quite calm and slow. “I don’t know how long I was in that state—for more than a day, I know; for I was quite conscious, and lived my outer life all the time, and took my medicines, and spoke to my mother, and heard what they said. But I didn’t take much note of time. I thought time was over for me, and that the tomb was what was beyond. Well, on last Sunday morning, as I seemed to lie in that tomb, alone, as I thought, for ever and ever, the black, dead wall was cleft in two, and I was caught up and borne through into the light by some great power, some living, mighty spirit. Tom, do you remember the living creatures and the wheels in Ezekiel? It was just like that. ‘When they went, I heard the noise of their wings, like the noise of great waters, as the voice of the Almighty, the voice of speech, as the noise of an host; when they stood, they let down their wings.’ ‘And they went every one straight forward: whither the spirit was to go, they went; and they turned not when they went.’ And we rushed through the bright air, which was full of myriads of living creatures, and paused on the brink of a great river. And the power held me up, and I knew that that great river was the grave, and death dwelt there, but not the death I had met in the black tomb. That, I felt, was gone for ever. For on the other bank of the great river I saw men and women and children rising up pure and bright, and the tears were wiped from their eyes, and they put on glory and strength, and all weariness and pain fell away. And beyond were a multitude which no man could number, and they worked at some great work; and they who rose from the river went on and joined in the work. They all worked, and each worked in a different way, but all at the same work. And I saw there my father, and the men in the old town whom I knew when I was a child—many a hard, stern man, who never came to church, and whom they called atheist and infidel. There they were, side by side with my father, whom I had seen toil and die for them, and women and little children, and the seal was on the foreheads of all. And I longed to see what the work was, and could not; so I tried to plunge in the river, for I thought I would join them, but I could not. Then I looked about to see how they got into the river. And this I could not see, but I saw myriads on this side, and they too worked, and I knew that it was the same work, and the same seal was on their foreheads. And though I saw that there was toil and anguish in the work of these, and that most that were working were blind and feeble, yet I longed no more to plunge into the river, but more and more to know what the work was. And as I looked I saw my mother and my sisters, and I saw the Doctor, and you, Tom, and hundreds more whom I knew; and at last I saw myself too, and I was toiling and doing ever so little a piece of the great work. Then it all melted away, and the power left me, and as it left me I thought I heard a voice say, ‘The vision is for an appointed time; though it tarry, wait for it, for in the end it shall speak and not lie, it shall surely come, it shall not tarry.’ It was early morning I know, then—it was so quiet and cool, and my mother was fast asleep in the chair by my bedside; but it wasn’t only a dream of mine. I know it wasn’t a dream. Then I fell into a deep sleep, and only woke after afternoon chapel; and the Doctor came and gave me the Sacrament, as I told you. I told him and my mother I should get well—I knew I should; but I couldn’t tell them why. Tom,” said Arthur gently, after another minute, “do you see why I could not grieve now to see my dearest friend die? It can’t be—it isn’t—all fever or illness. God would never have let me see it so clear if it wasn’t true. I don’t understand it all yet; it will take me my life and longer to do that—to find out what the work is.” –Tom Brown’s School Days
He would yearn to comfort each and every one of you now in your grief and fear, just as he ever strove to do when he was writing; there are so many works of Old Europe he quoted from to give and receive comfort. He would encourage you to read them now, we know, as you feel the need: Shakespeare’s 31st Sonnet, King Lear (his favorite work of literature), Tom Brown’s School Days, Uncle Silas, and The Shepherd Who Watched by Night to name a few, and especially the Gospels. The very last chapter he read aloud with us, his family, was St. John 16:
Verily, verily, I say unto you, That ye shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice: and ye shall be sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy. A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world. And ye now therefore have sorrow: but I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no man taketh from you.
Cambria Will Not Yield followed in the footsteps of our Lord and Savior and the antique Europeans; he took up the Cross and followed Him to the end; we know with certainty that he is risen with Him now.
Then the young Hero – He was God almighty – firm and unflinching, stripped Himself; He mounted on the high cross, brave in the sight of many, when He was minded to redeem mankind. Then I trembled when the Hero clasped me; yet I durst not bow to the earth, fall to the level of the ground, but I must needs stand firm. -The Dream of the Rood
But to those of us who must remain and wait yet a little while, Cambria Will Not Yield would have this to say in St. Paul’s words:
Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints.
He read those words to us, his family, many times; he would want to say them to you now as well.
Our prayers are with you all; please pray for us; we are in need of them. We all need Christ’s comfort and strength now more than ever, as night seems to be closing in around us; hold on till the dawn in His name and for His sake! Cambria Will Not Yield is still standing with us, for his spirit of loving fire can never be quenched. He was a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief, as our Lord was. Although he had full cause of weeping, he journeyed out of the shadow of the raven and into the light of the risen Lamb.
Then from the dawn it seem’d there came, but faint As from beyond the limit of the world, Like the last echo born of a great cry, Sounds, as if some fair city were one voice Around a king returning from his wars. -Idylls of the King
If you would find comfort in them, please listen to Cambria Will Not Yield’s favorite hymn, Abide With Me; he played it more times than a man can count, he loved it so. Also, No More Nights, which he came to love deeply in his later years.
Jesus Christ abide with you, dear brethren, and all of us! He will not leave us comfortless; believe that. Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. May the grace of our lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen. +
The South had its American Exceptionalists — Thomas Jefferson was the worst — but the South that had to be destroyed was the South that was rooted in European civilization, a civilization that had a blood tie with the God who took flesh and dwelt among us. A propositional faith and a propositional nation can be discarded quite easily for a new propositional faith and a new propositional nation, but a blood tie is forever. The willingness with which ‘conservatives’ denounce their blood ties to old Europe, of which the Old South was an exemplar, shows their willingness to make peace with the devil. Which brings us back to Origen and his belief in the conversion of the devil. –CWNY
On the instant stood revealed, as though he had blown down the ages, a pure Goth, unchanged in any essential since his fathers had left their forests and through all obstacles, even through ranks of Roman legionaries, sword in hand had hewn their way straight to the goal of their desires. He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart—a Goth. –Under the Crust
When a nation, such as the United States of America, which is really a non-nation, has institutionalized blasphemy against the living God, it’s hard to call any one liberal overlord the most blasphemous liberal overlord of them all, but when one of the Pope-essa of Liberaldom, Mika Brzezinski, steps forward and says that anyone who does not get vaccinated is not Christian, then I think we must give the title, Most Blasphemous of Them All, to Mika Brzezinski.
Has Mika the liberal Pope-essa, ever, in her long career as a blasphemer, supported anything Christian? No, she has not. In point of fact, and I use the word ‘fact’ because the liberals claim to love facts, she has consistently supported everything that is satanic – Black Lives Matter, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, sodomy, legalized abortion, transgenderism, the extermination of the white race, and the list goes on and on. It is clear whom Mika serves: she serves the devil, who is and always shall be, “a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” Mika, like all liberals, is a murderer and a liar, because she worships the devil in and through the sacred negro. So when Mika speaks ex cathedra from the holy liberal pulpit of MSNBC, we must listen to what she says, not as our doctrine, but as a revelation from her master, the devil. And we see in the great Mika’s condemnation of the non-vaccinated the truth behind the COVID-19 ‘crisis.’
COVID-19 was created by the American medical-scientific establishment and the Chinese government to kill and control white Europeans and destroy the economies of the white European nations. The fact that blacks were and are particularly susceptible to COVID-19 did not and does not bother the liberals in the slightest. The liberals do not care about individual blacks; if they did they would follow Christian policies similar to the old South and apartheid South Africa. Those societies more than any other societies actually tried to elevate, morally and economically, blacks to a higher level of existence in which they were something other than beasts. As it stands now, the liberals worship blacks in the abstract because they need them to justify and sanction all the blasphemies and depravities of Liberaldom. So long as Black Lives Matter reigns supreme, Satan shall reign supreme.
The COVID-19 virus was used to destroy Trump, who was unique among American Republican presidents in that he actually wanted white people to be part of America, but the virus was not concocted solely to destroy Trump. European nations that never had a Trump are using COVID-19 for their own ends, and the liberals are keeping the COVID-19 ‘crisis’ going in this country even though Trump has been disposed of. So what is the reason for COVID-19? Isn’t it obvious? COVID-19 is a very useful tool in the hands of the malevolent liberals. They can use it to further solidify and perpetuate their kingdom of hell on earth. “All must be vaccinated” is liberal double-speak; what they mean is all whites must obey all the dictates of liberalism. And all the dictates of Liberaldom can ultimately be summed up by one prime directive. “The white Christ-bearing race must be exterminated.”
It is not a case of COVID-19 being a hoax. I live in a multi-generational household in which every member of my household, with one exception, caught the virus.(1) Thankfully no one in my household died or had to be hospitalized, but it was a serious illness. And I know of many other people who have contracted the illness, but this illness, this thing called COVID-19, has been treated differently than other illnesses that plagued our people in the Christian and Christian-fumes eras of our history. The liberals deliberately created, in league with the Chinese communists, COVID-19; they fought tooth and nail to prevent people from recovering from the illness, and they are doing everything possible to keep the illness alive in order to consolidate their power over the American people. Why do they need power? Because too many white Americans — Trump’s election in 2016 was a warning to the liberals – will not go willingly to the gas chambers. So through COVID-19 and other ‘crises’ that will be coming down the liberal pike, the liberals hope to complete the extermination of the white race, always exempting themselves, of course, who have gone beyond whiteness (“I’m black inside,” intones Chris Cuomo).
It is not a good sign that America has ‘achieved’ a 70% vaccination record. That is a terrible thing to contemplate, because it indicates that Americans still, despite the fact that the medical-scientific community worked hand in glove with the Chinese government to create COVID-19, believe in Science writ large. To oppose Science is to oppose the liberals’ Holy Ghost, and just as opposing the Holy Ghost is the unforgivable sin in Christianity, so is opposing Science the unforgivable sin in the liberals’ satanic inversion of Christianity. Through abstract reason, the sacred negro, and holy science, the liberals promise redemption for all the members of a universalist community of men and women of color, and, of course, the desouled illuminated whites who have elevated themselves to a ‘higher’ level of existence than the ‘racist’ Europeans of the past.
It is not, unfortunately, that the 30% of unvaccinated Americans are unvaccinated because they are Christian Europeans getting ready to rise and ride against Liberaldom in the name of Christ the King. The unvaccinated remain unvaccinated for a myriad of reasons, most of which have nothing to do with Christianity. Quite the contrary, most of the professed Christians in the ranks of the moderate liberals are pro-vaccination. And that is understandable since the moderate liberals, the conservatives, do not look on liberalism as institutionalized Satanism. This vaccine crisis is part of a very old gambit of Satan that he has used time and time again: “Intelligence is science, and science is truth,” Satan tells us. And who wants to be stupid? Isn’t abstract reason the first person of the liberals’ trinity? We are back with Balzac who skewered the decadent intelligentsia of Paris: “In Paris, when they say a man has a good heart, they mean he is as stupid as a rhinoceros.” The unvaccinated do not have complete trust in the medical-scientific establishment, and that mistrust is the beginning of wisdom, a wisdom that could lead – but it is by no means written – to the foolishness of God.
In that magnificent novel, Shane, Marian Starrett laments the existence of guns. She yearns for the day when there will be no guns in the valley because then, she fantasizes, there will be no more killing. Shane very gently disagrees. He tells her that a gun is just a tool, no better or no worse than the man who wields it. So it is with reason; it is a tool, no better or no worse than the heart that wields it. But the moderate liberals do not regard reason as a tool of the heart; they regard it as an independent deity that can solve all of man’s problems. The problem of mad-dog liberalism can be solved, the conservatives believe, by reference to the deity of reason. But the mad-dog liberals cannot be swayed by the deity called reason. They use reason to serve the passion in their hearts, the hatred of Jesus Christ and the Christ-bearing race. You cannot, as the conservatives in church and state maintain, reference pure reason in order to bypass the evil passions of the human heart. By doing so you will leave Satan and his passionate followers triumphant in the lists without any Christian challengers, because there can be no knights of charity without passionate hearts connected to His passionate heart. Banning passion and appealing to pure reason as an antidote to evil passions partakes of the same gun-banning wish of Marian Starrett; you must support the good passion, the Christ-centered passion, in order to defeat the passionate followers, through the sacred negro, of Satan. Hugh McGee’s advice to his son is always apropos: “And think with passion, it’s the only kind of thought that is worth anything.”
On a weekly basis, I receive letters from ‘conservatives’ urging me to give money to and vote for Republican candidates. If I don’t, they warn me, very bad things will happen: “It will be the end of our Republic.” Shouldn’t the conservatives address the problem of the rhinoceros in the bedroom before they continue to urge the white grazers to get out there and support the Republican Party? We had a presidential election in this anti-nation in which the man who recorded an astounding majority of the votes was not allowed to win the election because some of his policies were not sufficiently anti-white and anti-Christian to please the liberal cabal that rules our anti-nation. If the conservatives want me to send funds to the protestors who went unarmed against the brutal, sadistic Capitol Police on January 6th, I will gladly send them funds. If they want me to join them in an effort to free Derek Chauvin, I will send them funds. But I have nothing but contempt for moderate liberals who think more liberalism is the cure for liberalism. Satan is the font of liberalism, and he is and always shall be a murderer and a liar. The conservatives who urge us to seek redemption through the democratic process urge us to seek redemption from the satanic founder of the democratic process. “Crucify Him,” and then, “Crucify His people,” will always be the battle cry of the men and women in charge of the demon-cratic process. Pure reason will not put a stop to such evil.
How does a demonic creature such as Mika Brzezinski dare to use Christianity to defend her demonism? She is permitted to do so because of the conservatives in church and state have shifted from a faith in our Lord and Savior who rose from the dead on the third day to a faith in a ‘Judeo-Greco-Roman-Celtic-Christian tradition.’ Conservatives in the twentieth century affirmed God, a God of many faiths and many peoples, but they did not affirm the one true God of one particular people. Burke was very specific about what should be conserved — it was Christian Europe. He did not want to preserve a propositional faith in a generic God who was all things to all people. Christ cannot be blended with a messianic faith in the nation state of Israel or in a pantheon of gods, consisting of the sacred negro, Muhammed, and the gods of the Amazon Rain Forest. He is either our Beginning and our End, or He is a useful tool of the liberals, to be pulled out of the closet every time they want to put the moderate liberals on the defensive. Why do the conservatives, the type of people who send me letters instructing me to defeat the mad-dog liberals by voting Republican, always respond to the aggression of the liberals by ceding the high ground to the liberals? When Derek Chauvin arrested a black criminal and that criminal died of a heart attack while resisting arrest, the ‘conservatives’ met the liberals’ war cry of ‘racism,’ with a cowardly betrayal of Derek Chauvin: “Most cops are good, just Derek Chauvin is bad.” When a brave band of protestors charged the liberal barricades on January 6th, the conservatives responded to the liberals’ charges of treason with, “Most of the protestors were non-violent.” Pontius Pilate lives and thrives in the ranks of the conservatives. And Pontius Pilate seemed to have more remorse than our modern conservative Pontius Pilates because he could not pour the balm of, “I am not racist,” over his soul.
Dickens closed his masterpiece, A Christmas Carol, by enjoining all of us to keep Christmas in our hearts as the repentant Scrooge kept Christmas in his heart: “May that be truly said of us and all of us!” Let it be truly said of us, the European remnant, that we are racist as the Dream of the Rood Christians of old Europe were racist, that we love our own with a passion that is grounded in the love of our Savior whose love passeth the understanding of ‘pure’ reason but enters and dwells within the heart that loves.+
(1) The medical-scientific community does not even understand the intricacies of the human body, so why on earth should we allow them to dictate to us on all things spiritual as well as physical? Despite living in close quarters with members of my family who had COVID-19, I did not contract the virus. I think it had something to do with my blood type, which differs from the rest of my family, but I’m not really sure why I didn’t contract the virus. But of course our medical-scientific experts are sure about everything. And they are particularly sure that the dead do not rise again. We, the last Europeans, hold to the contrary: Christ did indeed rise from the dead on the third day, and He has prepared a place for us in His house of many mansions. That is what the COVID-19 crisis is all about, Charlie Brown, it is about the eternal war between Christ and the devil. We dare not, we must not, be found wanting in the great battle.
O momentary grace of mortal men, Which we more hunt for than the grace of God! Who builds his hope in air of your good looks Lives like a drunken sailor on a mast, Ready, with every nod, to tumble down Into the fatal bowels of the deep.
Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. – John 8: 43-45
The moderate-liberal Ann Coulter, with the emphasis on liberal, recently included in her criticism of Black Lives Matter a condemnation of the ‘racists’ of the Old South. Coulter’s attempt to maneuver away from the extreme left while pandering to a non-existent moderate left by condemning the ‘racist’ Europeans of Christian Europe is all too typical of the moderate-liberals who pollute the print and internet mediums with their liberal conservatism. What are the moderate liberals trying to conserve? They want to conserve a liberalism that is three-quarters of the way to hell. But at the vital center of liberalism is Satan. He doesn’t want three-quarters of what was once Christian Europe, he wants it all. And he shall get it all if the only resistance to his reign is conservatives who want to stay slightly to the right of the mad-dog liberals as they progress to that final leap off the cliff with the swine. The first wave of swine plunging off the cliff will be the mad-dog liberals, and the second contingent will be the conservatives who will squeal out, “We are not racist,” as they plunge into oblivion right behind their swinish brethren, the mad-dog liberals.
The moderate-liberals are continually appealing to some unknown God that is rational, democratic, and a civil rights advocate. They want that God to intervene in human affairs and explain to the mad-dog liberals that their moderate brethren are not racist, they are not irrational, and they are not against science. Then, the unknown God will place the mad-dog liberals in subordinate positions to the oh-so-smart and oh-so-non-racist moderate liberals, and all will be well. Why don’t the moderate liberals, many of whom profess to be Christian, try to please a God who made Himself known to us, who took flesh and dwelt among us, rather than an unknown God who supports liberalism? The answer to that question can be found in an article by Allen Tate in which Tate made an analysis of the sickness of the West and decided, quite correctly, that rationalism was the root cause of the decline of Western civilization. But then Tate went on to conclude that what rationalism had caused, the demise of Western civilization, rationalism could cure. That is a conclusion that was penned in hell. Rationalism is a spiritual sickness, it cannot be cured by another, stronger dose of rationalism any more than cancer can be cured by injecting more cancer cells into the infected, diseased area of the body.
The moderate liberals refuse to accept what Burke said about liberalism –“The first liberal was the devil.” They, like Adam and Eve, like the mad-dog liberals, have succumbed to, “Ye shall be as gods.” If the moderate-liberals accepted Burke’s assessment of liberalism, that it is from the devil, they would have to forsake their rationalism, they would have to rely on a heart connected to His heart in order to overcome the wickedness and snares of the devil. “No,” the moderate liberals proclaim: “We propose and we dispose, let God stay away from the affairs of men.” But St. Paul tells us that, “Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good.” If we do not abhor liberalism because within Liberaldom are the political talk shows in which we can dazzle the world with our good, rational solutions to the problems caused by bad rationalism, and such punditry is worth the world to our egos, then we will not serve the good, we will serve Satan.
I am struck, whenever I read St. Paul, how deeply St. Paul’s Christ-imbued vision of existence penetrated the heart and mind of Edmund Burke. St. Paul’s injunction that we should, “Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good,” was echoed many years later by Edmund Burke when he enjoins his countrymen to oppose the Jacobins: “They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate.” The moderate liberals do not hate liberalism, they do not abhor evil, but they do hate the antique Europeans and their Christ-centered civilization — they hate “that which is good.” Coulter’s hatred of the Christian South lays bare the rotten core of what passes for conservatism. So, I ask again, if you are not striving to conserve that which is good, because that which is good is deemed ‘racist,’ then what are you striving to conserve? The ‘conservatives’ are striving to conserve a liberalism that stops just short of going off the cliff with the swine. But that is not possible, because the swine are possessed by the devil. Only the Christ of old Europe, who was the Christ of the Southern people who took European civilization to these shores, can stop the European people’s plunge off the cliff of liberalism. But we must believe that liberalism is of the devil. If we don’t, we shall not call on Him who saves, and we will be damned.
Once everything Satanic has been institutionalized in a nation, a European Christian cannot be conservative, he must be a counter-revolutionary. Need I go through the list of institutionalized perversions? Legalized abortion, sodomy, feminism, transgenderism have all been institutionalized under the mantle of the liberals’ one true God, the sacred negro. You can’t plead for a milder, gentler form of negro-worship than the type of worship advocated by Black Lives Matter. Once you have accepted the premise that liberalism is good, you must accept whatever the liberals’ savior commands. The black gods have no mercy, not a dram; if Coulter and her ilk want liberalism, then they must accept Black Lives Matter.
If we turn from the vomit of liberalism, be it moderate or mad-dog, we can see another way to face existence. Before his son Edward went off to war to face off against the Jacobins of the North, Hugh McGee gave his son the essence of his faith:
“The way I’ve been obliged to see it is this: our ideas and instincts work upon our memory of these people who have lived before us, and so they take on some clarity of outline. It’s not to our credit to think we began today, and it’s not to our glory to think we end today. All through time we keep coming in to the shore like waves—like waves. You stick to your blood, son; there’s a certain fierceness in blood that can bind you up with a long community of life.”
“I never forget you, Father,” Edward said.
“Your father wouldn’t know what the world was without that. And think with passion, it’s the only kind of thought that’s worth anything.”
The South had its American Exceptionalists — Thomas Jefferson was the worst — but the South that had to be destroyed was the South that was rooted in European civilization, a civilization that had a blood tie with the God who took flesh and dwelt among us. A propositional faith and a propositional nation can be discarded quite easily for a new propositional faith and a new propositional nation, but a blood tie is forever. The willingness with which ‘conservatives’ denounce their blood ties to old Europe, of which the Old South was an exemplar, shows their willingness to make peace with the devil. Which brings us back to Origen and his belief in the conversion of the devil. Can such things be? Is it only necessary that we affirm God, even if that God is the devil?
I agree with Walter Scott who said that the true historians are the bards. Homer was the great historian of the ancient Greeks just as the anonymous bard who wrote the Dream of the Rood, William Shakespeare, Charles Dickens, and Walter Scott himself were and are the historians of old Europe. And in our history as a people there is a recurring theme: The European people are constantly reenacting the Christ story. The villains imitate the Jews who crucified our Lord; the cowardly individuals who ultimately side with the Christ-haters, the Pontius Pilates of the world, are present as well – they are called ‘conservatives.’ And then there are the Christian heroes who follow in His train. There is an incredible scene in Charles Dickens’ Nicholas Nickleby in which the sublime beauty of a Christ-imbued hero comes to the forefront and gives us a glimpse of “that charity of honor.” Unable to watch the continual torture and degradation of a helpless, wretched man-child at the hands of the sadistic schoolmaster, Wackford Squeers, against his worldly, material interests, Nicholas steps forward and stops the torture by beating the schoolmaster. Later, when Nicholas is alone with the wretched Smike as his companion on a road bound to nowhere, the wretched outcast says to Nicholas Nickleby, “You are my home.” Yes, “In my house are many mansions.” The European, the Dream of the Rood European, the pre-Civil War Southern European, and every European who has not bent his knee to the liberals and the liberals’ gods, has only one home. Wherever His mercy and His charity dwells is “home” for the European. We are part of a community that goes all the way back to the stable in Bethlehem. If we sever our connection to that community, we are worse than nothing, we are the people who have chosen to follow Satan. And that terrible betrayal cannot be glossed over by a pathetic, blasphemous attempt to blend Satan and Christ in one universalist, Babylon state consecrated to the sacred negro.
In Shakespeare’s Richard III, Buckingham has lied, cheated, and murdered to help Richard obtain the crown. But when he balks at killing the two young princes, the true heirs to the throne, Richard turns on his hitherto loyal lieutenant:
I will converse with iron-witted fools And unrespective boys; none are for me That look into me with considerate eyes. High-reaching Buckingham grows circumspect.
The moderate-liberals must not waver, they must not stop at civil rights, they must go on to the worship of the sacred negro; they must not stop at first trimester abortions and no federal funding for abortions, there must be abortion-on-demand and federal funding; they must not stop at the condemnation of the racist Europeans of the past, they must consent to the extermination of all whites as a reparation for the past. And on it goes. Will the moderate liberals suffer the fate of Buckingham? I don’t think the pundits such as Coulter and the News Maxers will; they will shift ground and join the mad-dog liberals. It is the unwashed whites in the rank and file, like the individuals who charged the Capitol on January 6th, who will be exterminated. Those people still, and that is truly remarkable in this day and age, retain some heartfelt beliefs that run counter to liberalism. And unlike the conservative pundits, they are not about to abandon their beliefs because the principalities and powers of this world are against them. So they did what the conservative pundits were too ‘wise’ to do, they attacked the liberal leviathan armed only with a fierce hatred of liberal tyranny and a love for the last remnants of grace in a country committed to Satan. (1)
The COVID-19 vaccine is now killing more people than COVID-19, and there are more and more reports that the vaccine itself does not prevent COVID-19. Yet we are inundated with threats from the vaccine police: “You must be vaccinated.” Isn’t it obvious that the COVID-19 crisis is just the start of an escalating series of liberal-manufactured crises that will be used to ensure that Satan shall rule in perpetuity over the European people? I do not deny that COVID-19 exists. Like most viruses it hits some people harder than others. I have known people who threw it off quite easily and others who had to be hospitalized because of the illness. But the liberals are not interested in ending COVID-19, they are only interested in using the virus to further terrorize the European people. To what end? To consolidate their power, which is the power of Satan, over the European people.
The most damning indictment that can be made against the moderate liberals is that they do not hate the mad-dog liberals. They do not look at what the mad-dog liberals have wrought and “cry havoc and let loose the dogs of war.” Eventually they will be completely absorbed by the mad-dog liberals, and they will, “having entered hell, feel no flame,” because they will have become unmen without any soul to call their own. The ‘progress’ of liberalism is about desoulment. If a man has achieved desoulment, if he has severed his blood ties to that community of souls connected to the Suffering Servant, he can rest content with all things satanic, and he will seek to conserve Satandom so long as Satan agrees to couch his evil in high-sounding phrases such as ‘liberty, equality, and fraternity,’ which are all covered under the sacred canopy of “Black Lives Matter.” What good does it do a man to gain the whole world if he loses his soul? “What soul?” the modern European responds. “Show me the soul.” I can’t put the soul in a computer printout, but I can point you to that long blood line of Europeans who believed in the Word Made Flesh. Let us cleave unto them and kneel before Him who is our home. +
(1) When Satan rules a nation, through the sacred negro, it is not possible to remain Christian and still stay connected to modern Europe. But the great unwashed whites are not going to seek out that which has been lost, in dusty, discredited tomes of ancient lore. Modernity is their world, and they must make the best of it, so when a Trump comes along, a man who doesn’t want them, the despised white under-class, to be exterminated, they cling to him. I honor Trump for showing concern for the downtrodden whites and I honor them for at least showing some dissatisfaction with liberalism. My people are the antique Europeans, but I still have that in my heart which is sorry yet for the persecuted and condemned white grazers who are more sinned against than sinning. The great washed, the conservative pundits, will survive because they will keep shifting their ground, they will never take their stand. But the great unwashed, who are my people to the extent I have any people left, will not be able to shift their ground, because they will be unable to swallow liberalism whole. As a consequence, they will be exterminated. It is up to the antique European, the man connected to His Europe, to say, “Stop! This must not go on!”
And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals. And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof? And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon. And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon. And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. –Revelations 5: 1-5
There was, even in the Christian centuries (pre-twentieth century) of the European people, differences between Christian sects regarding the importance of the Bible. Still, I do not think an objective historian would deny that the Bible was the most influential book in Western civilization prior to the 20th century. But during all the Christian centuries of Europe, a different book, an underground book, was being written. This book was never put into one printed volume, but it exists as an ongoing work in progress, which is being written, under Satan’s direction, by men and women who hate the living God, whose story was imparted to us in that other book, the Holy Bible.
The beginning of the Book of Liberalism is contained in the Old and New Testaments. There we see Adam and Eve’s rebellion, instigated by Satan, their punishment, and the eventual redemption of mankind through Jesus Christ. And in the Pharisees’ hatred of Jesus Christ we see liberalism writ large. The subsequent history of the European people consists of the conflict between the Europeans who took the Word of God into their hearts and acted according to that faith within, and the Europeans who rejected that faith and took Satan into their hearts. That second story, the story of Satan’s people, is the story that has gained the upper hand in this, the 21st century, the century of Satan.
It should be noted, but it has not been noted by the conservative-moderate liberals, that the liberals have turned another page in the Book of Liberalism and started a new chapter. In the last chapter, the liberals used democracy to conceal their Satanism. But in the new chapter, which is part of Satan’s work in progress, the liberals no longer see the need to camouflage their Satanism. After years and years of liberal dominance in church and academy, the liberals feel that the white Europeans will not resist naked force. They think, and it seems like their assessment is correct, that they can impose their will upon a people who have no stomach for a fight to the death with the liberals and all the powers of hell. The capitulation of the European people to the liberals is a worldwide phenomenon, but it is particularly manifest in the United States, which had less of a European tradition to start with. What are some of the signs of the new chapter in the Book of Liberalism? Let’s turn the page from the ‘Christian fumes’ culture that was surviving on the fringes of Satandom to the new chapter in which the ‘Christian fumes’ culture has been eradicated.
The COVID-19 “crisis” was a landmark event that showcased the liberals’ new chapter, “The End of the Christian Fumes Culture.” In the previous chapter of the book of Satan, the liberals were not so blatant about their desire to kill white people. But in the new chapter, they murdered whites by creating a deadly disease, spreading a deadly disease, thwarting a cure for the deadly disease, and using the deadly disease to shut down the economy in order to destroy the white-working man. The liberals did not care about angering whites because they knew the moderate liberals in church and state would advise the whites to be nonviolent and to trust in the democratic process. They, of course, were right.
The second sign of the new chapter was the fraudulent election. The liberals did not even do a good job, they were quite transparent when they rigged the election. But they had the backing of the Supreme Court, which is the supremely satanic Court, and they once again had the backing of the moderate liberals who were quick to condemn anyone who challenged the fraudulent election. Which brings us to another sign of the new chapter of liberalism – the throwing of all whites who still want the ‘fumes of Christianity’ culture to the wolves.
The January 6th protestors were thrown to the wolves because they were “violent.” How charging unarmed against armed police constitutes “violence” is unclear to me, but nevertheless they were “violent,” so the moderate liberals, who want to remain in the Book of Liberalism and make that book a more moderate, less satanic book, called the protestors violent and threw them to the wolves of Liberaldom. And Trump himself was thrown to the wolves of Liberaldom by Amy ‘The Liberal’ Barrett, Brett ‘The Coward’ Kavanaugh, and the other sycophants of liberalism on the supremely satanic Supreme Court. Likewise, Pence and his Republican partners in crime, who make the Cowardly Lion look like a hero, threw Trump to the wolves in order to ensure that they would not be thrown out of the book of life, which is, in their warped, sick minds, the Book of Liberalism.
On page 561 in the Book of Liberalism, it says, “The European people will now proceed into the future without leaving a place for the whites who want to live in the ‘Christian fumes’ culture of the mid-20th century.” Trump wanted to turn back to page 550, which read, “We must allow for a few Christian fumes lest we stir up the few remaining die-hard Europeans.” That was Trump’s huge mistake. You can’t turn back the pages of Satan’s Book of Liberalism. The preceding chapter, the ‘Christian Fumes’ chapter, is closed. We must leave Satan’s book entirely or else we will become part of Satan’s story and be, “lost, lost, lost.” We needn’t, if we see with the interior eye, wait until the final chapter of Satan’s work in progress is written. We know how it ends, it ends in hell.
The apostle John, when he was a prisoner on the Isle of Patmos, was vouchsafed a vision of the living God that we ignore at our peril. Christ Himself tells John that, “I am he that liveth, and was dead; and behold, I am alive for evermore. Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.” That is how Christ’s book ends: He comforts the apostle John, who remained at the foot of the cross when all the others fled. Christ tells John not to despair because, “the lion of the tribe of Judah” can and shall open the book of the seven seals. The Christian European has now been isolated on his own spiritual Isle of Patmos; every cultural remnant of Christian Europe has been taken away from him. But there is St. John’s vision of the Lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world. Do we want to be part of that story which ends with the triumph of the God of love and mercy? Or do we want to be part of the devil’s work in progress? How does his story end? The devil’s story ends in hell, a hell where there is no love, no mercy, and no humanity; there are only beasts that “prey upon each other like monsters from the deep.” Isn’t that hell already upon us? Under the mantle of Black Lives Matter every aspect of the European people’s lives have been Satanized. The COVID-19 “crisis” is just the beginning of the new chapter of Satan’s story. He has ordered his minions to proceed with the final crackdown; through “Black Lives Matter” he intends to completely eliminate the image of God in man.
Toward the end of his life, Francois Mauriac explained why he had spent a lifetime writing novels when so many literary critics told him his novels were worthless. He said that he felt, despite so many contrary opinions, that he was called by God to write his novels. I feel the same way about my writing; I feel that I have been called by God to bear witness to the ‘image of God in man’ culture of the antique Europeans. If I am wrong, our Lord will tell me so at the Last Judgement. But until that time, I must, like Posthumus in Cymbeline, follow that inner vision.
The ‘image of God in man’ culture is Rembrandt, it is Handel, it is Shakespeare, it is Dickens, it is Scott, but it so much more. It is my great uncle, a coal miner, singing, “All Through the Night,” at a family reunion, it is millions and millions of such “simple fools” who kept faith with the “Lamb of God.” What is the end result of our lives if we keep faith with that ‘image of God in man’ culture that Satan and his liberal minions are so determined to eradicate from the face of the earth? We will see, like St. John who remained steadfast at the foot of the cross, a vision of the living God who broke the seal of the book of the seven seals. We must, now that we have been left on our own Isle of Patmos, stay with that vision even as Satan, through Black Lives Matter, attempts to tear the living God from our hearts.
I have more than just a little affection for those men and women, such as Trump and his supporters, who want to hold onto the Christian fumes culture of the mid-20th century. But we must see that such a fusion of liberalism and Christianity is not possible. We must see liberalism for what it is – the ongoing story of Satan’s counter-culture to Christian Europe, his ‘image of the beast in man’ culture. So long as ‘conservative’ means slightly to the right of the mad-dog liberals, so long as conservatives only want to be part of Liberaldom by claiming, “We are not racist, we do not support racist Europe“ — which means they are opposed to white pietas and the ‘image of God in man’ culture that was formed by white pietas — the ‘conservatives’ will be overwhelmed by the mad-dog liberals and they will become part of Satan’s story.
The “Black Lives Matter” chapter of Satan’s book of death is intended to be the last chapter in his book. Once Black Lives Matter is triumphant, once all whites bow down to the image of the beast, Satan will have completely obliterated God’s image in man. All whites will sing the litany, “We are not racist, we are not violent.” And there will be more tests of white subservience. “All must be vaccinated” will only be the start. Everything evil will be ‘mandatory’ and everything good will be proscribed. Will there be any resistance to the final satanic advance of liberalism? It doesn’t seem like there will be any resistance, but we do not know what can happen when our interior eyes are focused on the Christ of Old Europe. Quite possibly the same elder who spoke to John will speak to us: “Weep not; see, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, He who came from David, has won the right to open the book and its seven seals.” Why should we beg, “We are not racist,” for a place in Satan’s book when we can see what John saw and be comforted as John was, by the Lamb of God? That is our consummation, that is what we must devoutly wish for. Let us walk out of Satan’s work in progress into the Christ story; let us be, once again, the people who saw a great light.
Over 70 million people, most of whom were white, voted for Trump. That means over 70 million people were dissatisfied with some aspects of liberalism. I’m sure that less than 1% of those 70 million want, as I do, a return to Christian Europe while the rest still believe in most of the liberals’ agenda. But there’s the rub – the liberals will no longer brook any opposition. No one will be allowed to accept ‘most’ of the liberals’ agenda; the liberals must have, in the final chapter of liberalism, complete obedience. So from their perspective, they need to eliminate 70 million people. And they will not use gentle persuasion. No life is safe so long as Black Lives Matter is the dominant religion of the white race. We can rally around the Lion of the Tribe of Judah, or we can crawl on our bellies in front of the sacred negro. Is there any moral beauty in the liberals’ faith? Is there any charity, mercy, or love? Then why must we adhere to the liberals’ faith and forsake our ancient faith? Yes, we have been exiled to Patmos, but Patmos is our salvation, for it is there that we shall see, if we seek Him in our hearts, the Lamb of God who broke the seal on the book of the seven seals and revealed to us a vision of God’s love that will defeat Satan and his Black Lives Matter kingdom of eternal night. +
“And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life…”
“Antioch, farewell! For wisdom sees, those men Blush not in actions blacker than the night Will shun no course to keep them from the light.”
–Pericles, Prince of Tyre
From the dunnest pit of hell Biden comes forth to instruct the world, according to the dictates of his master, the archangel Lucifer. But tyrannicide is not an option, because Biden represents a cabal that is legion. His life is safe because he is merely a spokesperson for that legion. If he disappears tomorrow, another member of the legion from hell will assume his place. No government official can say, “a personality dwells here,” because there is no humanity in liberalism; the liberals are unmen who have given their souls to Satan.
Biden recently spoke to some of his denizens and pulled out a card on what was (he claimed) the death toll of the coronavirus pandemic. He had the satanic temerity to say his heart bled for the 600,000+ victims of the illness! This from the man who was a member of the liberal cabal that was unalterably opposed to any restrictions on trade or traffic with communist China. This from the man who was a member of the cabal that did everything they could to restrict the use of the hydroxychloroquine drug because Trump had suggested it could help in the treatment of the disease. Whatever is the actual number of deaths from COVID-19, is there any doubt that Biden and his liberal partners in Satanism deliberately, with malice aforethought, wanted to kill as many Americans as possible with the virus in order to stop Trump from winning re-election? No, there is no doubt. And yet the bloody monstrosity, a creature from hell, stands before the American people and claims he weeps over the people he helped to murder. One is reminded of the carpenter in Lewis Carroll’s tale who weeps over the oysters he has just eaten. And that is all actual humans are to the liberals: something to be eaten by the liberal leviathan.(1)
What Burke said about our elective affections being an infallible indication of what was in our hearts was and is true. My elective affections are with the Dream of the Rood Christians of Old Europe. Outside of my own family and a few other men and women, whom I only know through the internet, I do not know any Dream of the Rood Christians. But I still retain a certain affection for those in the moderate liberal camp who have not abandoned all the values stemming from the Dream of the Rood culture. That is where I break with the neo-pagans who see no difference between Trump and Biden, and some of whom even prefer Biden. Trump and his followers had and have more than just a “dram of mercy” in their souls, and Biden and the creatures that voted for him have no “dram of mercy” in their souls. How can a Christian European be indifferent to the contrast? The blended Christianity of Trump makes him blind to the satanic essence of liberalism, it makes him weak on so many issues, such as negro worship and the deification of the unrepentant Jew, but that dram of mercy in his soul also made him try to actually mitigate the effects of the coronavirus, to oppose the communist Chinese, to help Americans maintain their jobs, and to keep our Southern border under control. Those are not little things that a Christian should treat with an Olympian, philosophical indifference.
All that having been said in defense of Trump and his followers, the sad fact remains that the fusion of Christianity and liberalism, which is the essence of Trump’s movement, results in the triumph of Satan. Why? As oft this stage we have shown – Christ cannot be blended and still be the Son of the living God. Christ cannot reach our hearts if He is a co-redemptorist forever united to the sacred negro, a subordinate God to the nation state of Israel, or an end product of a syllogism. He must stand alone as the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords. We who are about to die need the unblended suffering Servant who has redeemed us from sin and death.
After the death of Robespierre, there was a large contingent of moderate English liberals who thought that an honorable man could make peace with Republican France. Burke pointed out to those moderate liberals that every single member of the Directory had signed on to the death of the King. He was adamant in his continued opposition to the spirit of liberty, equality, and fraternity that was destined, if unchecked, to destroy all of Christian Europe. Of course it was unchecked and it did destroy Christian Europe. And America? The framers of our Constitution, Franklin, Madison, and Jefferson, were religious atheists, and our great military hero, George Washington, rallied the troops by quoting from the most pernicious, evil European man who ever walked the earth – Thomas Paine. When the South rebelled against American Jacobinism, the Southerners claimed, “We did not sign on for this.” The modern Jacobins said, “Yes, you did.” And the Northern Jacobins were right. Negro worship is implicit in any nation that is founded on the proposition that nature and nature’s god shall rule. For what is nature, in the propositional sense? It is man’s reason, it is Thomas Paine’s logic, which preaches that Christ be not risen and the natural savage is our God. The South had no Christian King, no Alfred, so the South lost the war. They only held the enemy at bay when they had a fighting Monarch, Nathan Bedford Forrest. We are a hierarchically endowed people – “I serve the King, and the King serves Christ,” must be our battle cry.
The moderate liberals in Burke’s England were like unto the Trumpers; they were – and the Trumpers are – Origenists, who believe in the conversion of the devil:
The October Politician is so full of charity and good nature, that he supposes, that those very robbers and murderers themselves are in a course of amelioration; on what ground I cannot conceive, except on the long practice of every crime, and by its complete success. He is an Origenist, and believes in the conversion of the Devil. All that runs in the place of blood in his veins, is nothing but the milk of human kindness. He is as soft as a curd, though, as a politician, he might be supposed to be made of sterner stuff. He supposes (to use his own expression) “that the salutary truths which he inculcates, are making their way into their bosoms.” Their bosom is a rock of granite, on which falsehood has long since built her strong hold. Poor Truth has had a hard work of it with her little pickaxe. Nothing but gunpowder will do. – Letters on a Regicide Peace
It is worth nothing that Origen, the theologian who believed, contrary to the Gospel, that the devil could be converted, emasculated himself. Isn’t that what our moderate liberals have done? Haven’t they spiritually emasculated themselves before the sacred negro? Trump, an alpha male in so many respects, would not act during the summer of 2020 as the violence in the streets escalated. And why didn’t he act? He didn’t act because Antifa used Black Lives Matter as their shield. The murderer of Aaron Danielson was killed because he stepped away from his black shields, while all other Antifaers, who kept their sacred shields, rioted and murdered with impunity. Some Democratic governors who defunded their police forces are now making some efforts to refund their police, and the moderate conservatives are applauding their efforts, albeit with a few, “I told you sos” thrown in. But the amount of police and funds is not the central issue. You can increase the police force tenfold in numbers and funds, but that will not stop our cities and towns from becoming crime-ridden hell holes. It is not numbers and money that we need. You could cut every police force in half, in terms of numbers and money, and still put a major dent in violent crime if you empowered your police departments to fight, to actually fight, against black barbarians. So long as white policemen have been spiritually neutered, so long as they are trained to believe that crime is not crime if it is done by the sacred negroes, you will not have any police forces, you will have servants of the sacred negro who are hired to keep white citizens from defending themselves. Look what six black jurors and six white jurors did to Derek Chauvin. They sentenced him to a lifetime crucifixion because he took action against a black criminal. If you believe in the salvation of the devil, then you will never fight the devil’s own, the liberals and their colored gods.
The moderate liberals, who do not believe that the liberals are the devil’s own, have “nothing but the milk of human kindness” in their hearts when it comes to the sacred negroes and the mad-dog liberals, but they have made throwing their own people to the wolves a ‘conservative’ tradition. The police officers who stopped Jacob Blake from harming black children were thrown to the wolves, Derek Chauvin who arrested a drug-soaked criminal that died of a heart attack while resisting arrest, was thrown to the wolves, and every white man or woman who even suggests, let alone acts in self-defense, that whites should not commit racial suicide is thrown to the wolves, or should I say, the hellhounds of Liberaldom. Conservative Origenists cannot lead a counterrevolution, but they can lead a mass suicide movement based on their belief that a man can be saved by the devil once he rejects the extremism of white pietas.
Let me offer a counter-proposal to the moderate-liberals’ proposal that we can convert the devil if we are civil, polite, and rational. Let me state the obvious – the devil hates Christ because the devil is evil and Christ is good. The devil cannot be redeemed. We are called, as Christians, to hate the devil and all of his works. And what is the proudest work of the devil? It is the liberals; the devil cannot create a human being, but he can refashion what was wrought by God into something so hideous, so evil, that it becomes the work of the devil. Burke put it quite well when he wrote that the Jacobins could not strike God out of heaven, but they could obscure Him from our sight by “defacing, degrading, torturing, and tearing in pieces his image in man.” The major indictment of modern Liberaldom, and most particularly of our own “land of liberty,” is that the modern liberals have gone further than any people at any time in history in blotting out the image of God in man. And the European people were once the people who championed the image of God in man in defiance of the heathen world. “Oh, what a falling off was there.” Now, a Christian of the old stock must champion Christ in defiance of the new Europe, a post-Christian Europe, infinitely worse than any heathen nation ever was. And the moderate liberals tell us that we can redeem such a nation if we support civil rights, free enterprise, and the salvation of the devil. For shame, for shame, eternal shame if we make such a compromise with the devil and his minions.
Western civilization was founded on the belief that Christ rose from the dead on the third day. Modern Europe, the Europe we see before our eyes today, was founded on the belief that Christ be not risen, He is not the Son of the Living God. That is why Burke labored so manfully to warn us about the French Revolution. The civil wars between rival claimants to Christian thrones were very sad affairs, but such wars did not constitute a change in the ruling faith of the nations involved in the civil wars. The French Revolution did constitute a change from Christ is risen to Christ be not risen. And in our anti-nation Thomas Paine’s hatred of Christianity was institutionalized through the seductive lure of, “you can keep your religion if it remains a private thing, but the serious business of our nation is the promotion of liberty, equality, and fraternity, independent of that great imposter, Jesus Christ.”
St. Paul told the Jews, with great sadness because they were his people, that he would take his message, that Christ was the Son of the living God, to the Gentiles and they would hear him. And our people did hear him. God bless them for it. But what has happened to the European people? Why have they hardened their hearts, like the stiff-necked Jews that St. Paul condemned, against the living God? Let us look to Acts 28: 26-29for the answer to that question:
Saying, Go unto this people, and say, Hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive: For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them. Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it. And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves.
St. Paul told the Jews and he tells us that our understanding of God comes from the heart: “and understand with their hearts, and should be converted, and I should heal them.” The medieval scholastics and the Protestant scholastics who followed in their train, who bid us understand God with our minds while eschewing our heart’s passions because those passions are evil, left us bereft of our shield against the wickedness and snares of the devil, who can manipulate our reason to believe his lies. Our shield and strength was and is a heart connected to His heart, through and in our people who saw, in their hearts, the Word made flesh, and who believed in their hearts.
Most of the giants of religious atheism, Rousseau, Paine, Darwin, Freud, and Marx, were products of the 18th and 19th centuries. The 20th century liberals such as Shaw and Einstein merely parroted their atheist forefathers. We, the Europeans of the 20th century and the 21st century, inherited either the mad-dog liberalism of the religious atheists or the moderate liberalism of the English moderates whom Burke fought against. My parents were moderate liberals and their moderate liberalism, which they bequeathed to me and my siblings, turned my sister into a mad-dog liberal. There is free will; my sister was sent to a private ‘religious’ college where she was exposed to intellectual Christianity as a buttress against atheism. But she went the way of mad-dog liberalism for the same reason her contemporaries went over to mad-dog liberalism: Intellectual Christianity did not touch her heart, but the wickedness and snares of the devil did touch her heart. I pray for her conversion while condemning, with all my heart, her evil religion that is devoid of all mercy and all charity. Liberalism is the synthesis of all evil; we cannot be demur and moderate in the face of that evil. Is there any heart left in the bowels of what was once Christendom who hates the image of the beast in man culture of Satan enough to rise and ride in defense of His Europe? In one of his Christian hymns, the singer Glen Campbell asks, referencing his own death, “Who will sing one song for me?” Every time I hear that song, I reply, “I will.” And that is all we can do for our Lord when He asks us who shall stand with Him in the last great battle: “I will,” is our answer, and then we will rise and ride in defense of Christ’s Europe. +
(1) Burke and Taine added cannibalism to the sins of the Jacobins because they drank the blood of the guillotined aristocrats. So do our modern Jacobins consume the blood of aborted babies in facial creams and beauty products while feasting, through their black gods, on the blood of slaughtered whites.
There shall be the song of angels, the delight of the blessed; there shall be the dear face of the Lord brighter than the sun for all the happy ones; there shall be the love of friends; life without death; a glad multitude of men; youth without age; the glory of the heavenly hosts; salvation without sorrow; rest without strife for those who did right; the glory of the blessed; day without darkness, radiant, full of splendor; gladness without griefs; peace henceforth without dissension between friends happy in heaven; love without enmity among the saints. There shall be neither hunger nor thirst there, sleep nor grievous sickness, nor the heat of the sun, nor cold nor care; but the band of the blessed, the most glorious of hosts, with the Lord of heaven shall ever enjoy there the grace of the King.
I understand the mad-dog liberals. Their hatred for Jesus Christ and the people who once loved Him has placed them with Shylock, outside the ken of humanity:
I am sorry for thee, thou art come to answer A stony adversary, an inhuman wretch, Uncapable of pity, void and empty From any dram of mercy.
But I do not understand the News Max conservatives and the Breitbart conservatives. These people seem to have retained some “dram of mercy” in their souls, and yet they try to dialog with liberals who have no “dram of mercy.” Portia sees past Shylock’s formal protestations of “justice, justice,” to what is in his heart, the hatred of Jesus Christ and His people. And she, because she has become a stand-in for our Lord, does what is needful. She offers him a chance for mercy:
Therefore, Jew, Though justice be thy plea, consider this, That, in the course of justice, none of us Should see salvation. We do pray for mercy, And that same prayer doth teach us all to render The deeds of mercy.
Shylock does not repent, and he is forced to pay the consequences of his satanic opposition to Christ’s reign of charity:
Tarry, Jew: It is enacted in the laws of Venice, If it be prov’d against an alien That by direct or indirect attempts He seek the life of any citizen, The party ’gainst the which he doth contrive Shall seize one half his goods; the other half Comes to the privy coffer of the state; And the offender’s life lies in the mercy Of the Duke only, ’gainst all other voice: In which predicament, I say, thou stand’st; For it appears, by manifest proceeding, That indirectly, and directly too, Thou hast contrived against the very life Of the defendant; and thou hast incurr’d The danger formerly by me rehears’d. Down, therefore, and beg mercy of the Duke.
It is not wrong to point out the history of the Jews’ opposition to Christ’s reign of charity. But we must see that the European liberals have become like unto the Shylockian Jews: they have become Christian apostates, who have no mercy or charitable impulses, not a dram; they have only a maniacal hatred for Jesus Christ and the people who once championed Him. Can we dialog with such creatures? Of course we can’t. And yet the conservatives bid us dialog with them. So, I repeat, I do not understand the conservatives.
Let me make a distinction between the unmen such as Romney and Pence and men like Trump. Romney and Pence said things that theoretically placed them in the moderate liberal-conservative camp, but then when they felt the political winds were shifting, they moved over to the mad-dog liberal camp. Their ilk we shall always have with us:
Is like a villain with a smiling cheek, A goodly apple rotten at the heart. O, what a goodly outside falsehood hath!
Trump, to his credit, actually believed in a fusion of Christianity and liberalism. And when he obtained office, he remained true to his stated faith. Trump’s faith is the same faith as the News Maxers’ and the Breitbarters’ faith; it is not wholly incompatible with Christianity nor is it wholly incompatible with liberalism. And that is the rub. Our God is a jealous God. You can’t be part Christian and part liberal. And the liberals’ God, the sacred negro, is a jealous god; you can’t retain even the fumes of a Christian culture if you want to have a place in Liberaldom. It seems as if the liberals and the moderate liberals should not be at odds. Don’t they both support civil rights, economic prosperity, and the four freedoms? No, they do not. The mad-dog liberals do not want civil rights for the negro, they do not want equality. They want the negro as a God: all whites must worship the sacred negro. The conservatives are always trying to show the mad-dog liberals that they love Martin Luther King Jr. and that they are for the full enfranchisement of blacks. They are not 19th century Southerners nor are they 1950 segregationists. But that is not enough. The liberals and their black minions have even developed a new doublespeak for the worship of the sacred negro; that doublespeak is “equity.” It is supposed to mean that when blacks have been suppressed for over one thousand years, it is not enough to make them equal, they must be more equal. That is right and fair, isn’t it? “No, it isn’t right and fair,” the moderate liberals say. They stick to equality. But they fail to see the religious zeal behind the liberals’ “equity.” Equity means the worship of the sacred negro. You must reject equality and the enfranchisement of the negro if you really want to put an end to equity, which is the worship of the sacred negro and all the perversions that follow in the wake of that satanic religion. But it would be undemocratic to oppose the enfranchisement of the black race. It would place a man back with the evil empire, the land of Forrest and the pre-Civil War white Europeans of the South. Yes, it would. The old South was not an aberration that sprang from hell in the midst of Liberaldom, it was a land connected to His Europe. To be Southern, in the best sense of the word, was to be a Walter Scott European. The South was the last bastion of the code of the white men in North America. Equality and equity are one and the same; the mad-dog liberals have grasped that fact, the moderate liberals have not. Hence the moderate liberals blather on about their love for Jackie Robinson and Martin Luther King Jr. and do not understand why the liberals continue to hate them.
The result of a conservative leadership that does not understand the evil of liberalism, that wants to dialog with the devil, has been the massacre of the innocents. All the babies murdered in the womb had to die because the conservatives refused to see that you cannot dialog with liberals. The whites who are murdered in the streets by black barbarians, the whites who stormed the Capital unarmed on January 6th and are now being tortured in prison are all victims of a conservative leadership that bids their followers be non-violent and democratic in the face of a satanic enemy that is violent and totalitarian. The mixture of a messianic belief in the democratic process and a disbelief in the demonic origins of liberalism is a recipe for disaster we should no longer follow.
My efforts to understand the moderate liberals is still a work in process. During the days preceding the 2020 Presidential election and after the military coup that subverted the election, I went out of my way to speak to Trump supporters. Was there one common denominator among them that distinguished them from the mad-dog liberals and the antique Europeans? Yes, there was. The Trumpers, who are called conservatives by the mad-dog liberals, did not and do not believe that whites cannot be part of Liberaldom because they are irredeemably racist as the mad-dog liberals maintain. They do not use the n-word, they support civil rights, they honor Martin Luther King Jr., and they repudiate the racist Europeans of the past, so why do the liberals condemn them? They feel they are being treated unfairly by the liberals. And of course they are being treated unfairly, but the liberals are not committed to anything remotely resembling fairness. They are committed to their mystery religion which must have a savior, which is the sacred negro, and which must have a devil, which is the unenlightened white, most particularly the unenlightened white male. The Trumpers are forever on the defensive, trying to prove they are not racist, while the liberals are always on the offensive, asserting the impossibility of redemption for the unenlightened white. And ‘enlightenment’ is always defined as the complete acceptance of the evil of everything the antique Europeans considered to be virtuous – chivalry, charity, and pietas. And that is where the Trumpers break with the antique Europeans. The antique European wants to rise and ride in defense of Derek Chauvin, who is being crucified because he did what was chivalrous and honorable — he fought for the right against black barbarianism, while the Trumpers seek to distance themselves from his ‘racism.’ When the antique European hears of a woman in Greece who was raped by an Afghan and then raped by three Pakistanis to whom she went for aid, he does not want to vote against the rape of white Greek women, he wants to kill the perpetrators of the crime and drive the rest of their tribe out of Greece and off the face of the earth. The white grazers, the conservatives, are the only people on the face of the earth who will not act instinctively, according to their hearts, when their people are brutalized, tortured, and murdered by colored barbarians within and without their nation. Their “elective affections” are not with their own people because they do not believe they are a people. That is regrettably and tragically what separates the white grazers, the News Max conservatives and the Breitbarters, from their Christian ancestors. And that separation is what keeps all those who follow the “conservatives” in the liberals’ hell on earth. “And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us that would come from thence.” – Luke 16: 26
Two authors, one English, one Southern, who were still writing in the early part of the 20th century but who personally adhered to and ‘romanticized’ the 19th century code of the white man, which was under attack in the 20th century, show us the transition from the whiteness of “bred in the bone Christianity” to the darkness of an intellectual affirmation of the Christian God, which is blended with an elective sympathy with the heathen gods of liberalism. Just as Solomon affirmed his faith in the God of Israel while paying homage to the heathen gods of his wives, so do the modern conservatives give lip service to the Savior while they give their hearts to the heathen gods of color. Page writes of a Christian gentleman who deliberately loses a horse race rather than risk injuring a man who has fallen off his horse during the race. A witness to the scene says that he couldn’t have planned such a chivalrous act, it must have been by accident. “No,” a wise observer replies, “It was no happy accident, his action was ‘bred in the bone.’” And Thomas Nelson Page’s European counterpart, P. C. Wren, concurs; he depicts the living faith, that charity of honor, which is bred in the bone of the white man, in his novel Beggar’s Horses. The hero, “the bravest of the brave,” who has killed in the name of “that charity of honor,” is given the highest tribute that a Christian gentleman can give another man: “I’ll take your word on it, Ganesh. For you’re the best and whitest man God ever made.” Yes, there is the gulf between our modern world, which the conservatives bid us accept, and the old world, Christian Europe, which we must cling to and champion. Whiteness is not evil in that old world, it is our earthly connection to His kingdom come, because it is through pietas, which is our whiteness, coupled with the charity of honor, that we remain connected to the heart of our Savior.
When our people bent their knees to Christ, they did so, not as the conquered but as the conquerors. They remain the only people, as an entire people, who adopted the religion of the people they conquered. Why? Because they saw that Odin and other hero gods were forerunners of the one true Hero God. The Savior did not ask them to renounce the code of heroes such as Gunnar:
He that lavished rings in largesse, When the fight’s red rain-drops fell, Bright of face, with heart-strings hardy, Hogni’s father met his fate; Then his brow with helmet shrouding, Bearing battle-shield, he spake, ‘I will die the prop of battle, Sooner die than yield an inch, Yes, sooner die than yield an inch.’
Christ called upon them to take the warriors’ code to a higher level, to that charity of honor which He and He alone can impart to human hearts. The unyielding battle hymn of Hogni’s father, Gunnar, became, once it was purified by Christ the Lord, the Dream of the Rood. And the defense of all the values stemming from the Dream of the Rood, faith, hope, and charity, constitutes the code of the white man that sustained our people in all the Christian centuries preceding the 20th and 21st centuries. The democratic ethos, the American way, call it what you will, is no substitute for the code of the white man.
The Europeans’ belief in fighting hero gods prepared them for their eventual faith in the one true Hero God:
The Nordic religion was not a religion of dread, or of magic formularies to propitiate hostile powers. Instead of covering its temples with frescoes of the tortures of the damned, it taught people not be afraid of death. Its ideal was the fellowship of the hero with the gods, not merely in feasting and victory, but in danger and defeat. For the gods, too, are in the hands of fate, and the Scandinavian vision of the twilight of the gods that was to end the world showed the heroes dying valiantly in the last hopeless fight against the forces of chaos—loyal and fearless to the last. It is an incomplete but not an ignoble religion. It contains those elements of character which it was the special mission of the Nordic peoples to add to modern civilization and to Christianity itself. –History of England
But something happened to the people who saw Christ as the Hero of heroes and the King of kings. That something was the rationalist dragon. When I was in Crete, I went through the cave that was supposed to have been the labyrinth that Theseus went through when he encountered the Minotaur. And since I believed that the myth was grounded in fact, I was thrilled, even though it was just in my imagination, to relive Theseus’ heroic encounter with the Minotaur. What the great scholastics did — quite possibly they were well intentioned – was to eliminate that journey through the labyrinth of the human heart because they wanted to spare us the encounter with the Minotaur. But what if the Christian must encounter the Minotaur in order to get past the Minotaur to that other door, the door where buried love doth live? St. Thomas set barriers up, where reason and science were not supposed to go, lest those two entities should destroy faith. But what if reason and science will not stop, what if they will break the barrier behind which faith dwells and start to dissect faith until there is no faith left? What force on earth shall stop the dissection of God and man in the name of reason and science? The Christian hero will stop them, the man who, like St. Paul, has a heart connected to His divine heart. If we must eschew the labyrinth of the human heart because we might be killed by the Minotaur of evil passions, how will we have the good passion, how will we have the heart to defeat the liberals who are the great dissectors of man and God?
Without the hero who is not afraid of the labyrinth of the human heart, we have only mad-dog liberals intent on destroying all things white and Christian through the unholy trinity of reason, the sacred negro, and science, and moderate liberals, the white grazers, who want to keep reason and science as the first and third part of the modern trinity while keeping Christ and the sacred negro as co-redemptorists. That can never be; we are not men of reason or science, we are men possessed with an interior poetic vision which sees the God above reason and science. And such men do not do homage to the sacred negro, they see only one God, the heart of hearts, and the one True Hero God. When white men believe in their whiteness, in that charity of honor which connects them to the Savior, the liberals’ day will end. Until that re-ensoulment of the white man occurs, Satan, through negro-worshipping liberalism, will rule what was once the green and pleasant land called Christian Europe. +
Now if ye be ready that at what time ye hear the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, and dulcimer, and all kinds of musick, ye fall down and worship the image which I have made; well: but if ye worship not, ye shall be cast the same hour into the midst of a burning fiery furnace; and who is that God that shall deliver you out of my hands? Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, answered and said to the king, O Nebuchadnezzar, we are not careful to answer thee in this matter. If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, O king. But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up. Then was Nebuchadnezzar full of fury, and the form of his visage was changed against Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego: therefore he spake, and commanded that they should heat the furnace one seven times more than it was wont to be heated. –Daniel 3: 15-19
How must we feel, if the pride and flower of the English Nobility and Gentry, who might escape the pestilential clime, and the devouring sword, should, if taken prisoners, be delivered over as rebel subjects, to be condemned as rebels, as traitors, as the vilest of all criminals, by tribunals formed of Maroon negro slaves, covered over with the blood of their masters, who were made free and organized into judges, for their robberies and murders? -Burke, Letters on a Regicide Peace
One of my all-time favorite movies is A Miracle on 34th Street (1947), and my favorite television show is Leave it to Beaver (1957–1963). I love the movie and the show because they are both wonderful representations of the ‘Christian fumes’ culture of the middle half of the 20th century. They portray people who still behave according to that charity of honor practiced by our Lord when He walked this earth. But, alas, I realize when viewing the movie and the television show, that the fumes of Christianity are not going to sustain me in the war against the liberals. The Achilles heel in the ‘Christian fumes’ culture is quite evident in Miracle on 34th Street and in Leave It to Beaver. In the movie, Kris Kringle is only against amateur psychologists trying to practice psychotherapy, he is not against the scientific dissection of man and God so long as it is practiced by a licensed psychologist. And we hear much about the spirit of Christmas in the movie, but nothing about the Babe in the Manger, who is the reason for Christmas. Likewise, in Leave it to Beaver, Ward and June are wonderful parents – they have a Christian ethos – but they are moderate liberals, with a Norman Rockwell view of God as the benevolent Father of American democracy who stays in the background while Americans march ever onward to… I prefer the worlds of Miracle on 34th Street and Leave It to Beaver to our modern world, but the fumes’ culture, once it has been destroyed, cannot be resurrected any more than the burnt-out coals of a charcoal fire can be turned into a raging fire again. We must go back to the live coals that started the original fire.
There is so much for us to learn from the story of Prometheus, who stole fire from the gods of Greece and gave it to men, because he had compassion for them. We all know his punishment – he was tied to a rock where eagles pecked at his entrails. Is that story a presentiment, through a glass darkly, of our redemption through Jesus Christ? The true fire was not an actual fire, it was the fire in our hearts that was ignited by Christ’s bold act of divine charity. When the divine heart makes such a sacrifice, how can human hearts fail to respond? Our people did respond to Christ’s loving embrace, and the evidence of that response is contained in our history, not the history told by statisticians, but our history as told by the European bards. If you read that story with the inner eye of the heart, you will see something of “great constancy; but how so ever, strange and admirable.”
I feel myself to be part of a long line of people who were constant and unyielding in their love of Him who died on the cross. I don’t see how we can part from those people and still be connected to the God who comes to human hearts. Obviously, the modern Europeans think I am wrong. The churchmen tell me that I must not feel connected to a particular people who loved much, they claim that I need only be connected, through their minds, to an abstract God who does not impart to human hearts, He only imparts to an elect group of human minds. And the secular counterparts of the churchmen tell me that the culture of those dear old folks of long ago was racist, sexist, and homophobic and that I need to be, I must be — or they will destroy me — connected to the culture of the true god, the sacred negro. And that is what is at the heart of all the political and ecclesiastical wars of the latter part of the 20th century and the 21st century. Now that even the fumes of a Christian culture have died out, will there be any Europeans who will fight to go back, not to the ‘Christian fumes’ culture of Miracle on 34th Street and Leave It to Beaver but to the culture of the antique Europeans? It doesn’t seem likely. But then it didn’t seem likely back then, in ancient times, that the European people would see beauty on the cross and embrace that cross. But they did.
There was a man who lived up the street from me in the town where I grew up, who was an alcoholic. He was a sad case, because he left behind a wife and five kids when he died prematurely of liver cancer. When he was given less than a month to live, he kept planning vacations and other activities that he envisioned taking place many, many months after his date with death. Everything was business as usual in Mr. ______’s mind, not because, “I’ve got to keep going right to the end,” but because he didn’t even want to consider his death. The conservatives have taken the same stance vis-à-vis reality as my neighbor of long ago. They spent a year prior to the presidential election urging Americans to vote against the liberals’ agenda by voting for Donald Trump. And the majority of Americans did just that; they voted for Donald Trump. But the liberals, following in the footsteps of Joseph Stalin who said, “It doesn’t matter how many people vote, only who counts them,” nullified the election of Donald Trump. What should be the reaction of the conservatives who urged us to vote our troubles away? They should tell us we should give up on the democratic process and look to such exemplars as Alfred the Great and Nathan Bedford Forrest. But of course, the conservative sons of Martha did not tell us to rise and ride. Instead they told us to sit tight and vote Republican. “Fifty-one percent of the American people are against LGBQTA, and sixty-one percent are against transgender bathrooms,” the conservatives intone. “So vote Republican and all will be well.” All will not be well if we vote Republican. The only Republicans that can be elected are Republicans that do not challenge the status quo of liberalism. If any Republican shows himself to have a genuine desire to return to the fumes of a Christian culture – to combine Christianity with liberalism – they will be cast out of the political arena. The democratic way is the demon-cratic way; it must be discarded.
I only just learned – mea culpa, mea culpa, I did not do proper homage — that this past month has been LGBQTA month. All of our major institutions have celebrated the beautiful wonder and magnificence of sexual perversion. In one of the two instances in the Old Testament in which God came down in person to condemn and warn mankind of their sins (the tower of Babylon was the other instance), He came down to earth to condemn the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. What do we think of a civilization that institutionalizes and lauds the depravities of Sodom and Gomorrah? Do we think that we can dialog with the rulers of that civilization? Do we think that we can form a community with the citizens of that anti-civilization who support such practices? What are the conservatives trying to conserve? Why do they bid us seek redemption from the devil through the demon-cratic process? Is it because they do not believe there is a devil who prowls about the world seeking the ruin of souls? If that is the case, then we must conclude they also do not believe in the devil’s antagonist who does not prowl about the world seeking our ruin but who asks us to let Him into our hearts so that He can impart to us that charity of honor, which is more than a match for the wickedness and snares of the devil.
Let us be clear about the linchpin of the liberals’ theocracy. It is the sacred negro. He is their savior, to whom they look to uphold all the evils that stem from their black mystery religion. Legalized abortion, legalized sodomy, feminism, transgenderism, and the systematic destruction of the white race are made possible through and in the worship of the sacred negro. And it has now become so blatant that a white European has to be in a moral coma, he has to be a mesmerized devotee of the sacred negro not to see the soul-killing satanic essence of the liberals’ faith. Witness the reverent call for silent devotion to the infamous George Floyd in the Senate, witness the call for prayers for Jacob Blake by the great ‘conservative’ Mike Pence at the Republican Convention, and watch the faithful, the white faithful, gather around the gigantic statue of George Floyd in Newark, New Jersey. Is such a religion worthy of our support? Can we bow to the sacred negro and still call ourselves Christians? Can we call ourselves human beings? No, we can’t, because no pagan has ever stooped as low as the European who bends his knee to the sacred negro. It is all or nothing for the white European. Either he will be a European, a Dream of the Rood Christian, or he will be the lowest form of life, he will be a liberal.
To be a liberal or not to be a liberal is the great question. The whites who voted for Trump are not all of the same ilk, they voted for him for a variety of reasons, but they all were dissatisfied with some aspects of liberalism. That is not enough. You can’t rearrange hell to make it more comfortable, more compatible for humanity, for the simple reason that there is no room for humanity in hell. Hell is the absence of humanity. The reason our churchmen have been of no use to us in the battle against the liberal leviathan is because they have supported a gnostic Christianity, which denies the possibility of an incarnational culture. If there is no such thing as a heart of flesh, if all that is good emanates from the mind of God and is then disseminated to the minds of a few great men, then all that is human, all that stems from the human heart, must be regarded as evil. But what about our people’s loving response to Christ’s incredible act of divine charity? Is that response an illusion that creatures such as I cling to in sinful defiance of the great men of intellect? There are so many evil manifestations of the liberals’ absolute tyrannical control, with the tacit consent of the Christian clergy, of the European people. I recently read that a Christian organization, which professed to adhere to Biblical principles, was denied tax exempt status by the IRS. The reason for the denial was simple – the IRS said that since people who had Biblical principles voted Republican, anyone who professed such principles was not eligible for tax-exempt status. Everything seems to be going to hell so quickly now, but there has been only a façade of a real civilization for the past fifty years. Behind that façade was a satanic presence waiting to emerge, under the auspices of the sacred negro, and make life on this earth an extension of hell.
“Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know,” was Keats’ assertion. But we still must decide what is beautiful. Keats saw beauty in a Grecian urn and the French Revolution. The modern Europeans see beauty in the sacred negro. And our churchmen see beauty in their syllogisms. I see something different. I see a civilization in which the penultimate of truth and beauty was the Savior who bled and died for us. That Christ is the grave where “buried love doth live” was the heartfelt faith of the antique Europeans. I do not see how we can forsake that faith for the liberals’ mystery religion, which is grounded in their fervent faith in the sacred negro and the perversions that accompany that faith. What is truth, what is beauty? Christ is Truth, Christ is beauty. That was the faith of our people when they were a people. All the ‘conservative’ think tanks and ‘conservative’ political action groups cannot put European civilization back together again unless they embrace the Christ-centered culture of the condemned, ‘racist’ Europeans of long ago. That was our hope in ages past and our only hope in this age of decadence and desolation. My original question remains: When the Divine Heart makes such a sacrifice, how can human hearts fail to respond? +
The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound; To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn. Isaiah 61: 1-2
In the 1700s, Burke warned the European people that they were spending, in their passion for liberty, equality, and fraternity, the “unbought grace of life.” In 1950, Herbert Butterfield stated that the European people were living off of the fumes of Christianity. Now what is left to us? There is nothing left to us from that culture of God’s grace. What started out as a small cabal of demonic creatures called liberals became a large, militant army that purged the unbought grace of life from the hearts of the European people. Nothing good will follow in the European drama without the unbought grace of life that we have cast aside.
Liberalism, like Christianity, is a revelatory faith; it is not a philosophy. When you try to make it a philosophy, you kill it. Even though the liberals profess to be adherents of pure reason, reason is only the first person of their trinity. They must be true to their inner dynamic, to their mystical core, which is the sacred negro, if they want to maintain their faith. The advocates of pure reason without reference to the sacred negro within the boundaries of Liberaldom are like unto the scholastics within the bowels of Christendom. They are harmful parasites because they seek to pluck out the mystery which sustains the faithful; in the case of liberalism – the mystery of the Man-God, the Sacred Negro, and in the case of Christianity, the scholastics seek to pluck out the mystery of the God-Man, Jesus Christ.
We must go back in time and see with the inner eye – with that eye we see the failure of Greek rationalism. It was the mystery religions that had captured the hearts of the people at the time that Christ entered human history. He did not defeat Mithras and Cybele because He offered mankind a rational alternative to the irrationality of the mystery religions. Oh no! He revealed, in His divine humanity, a mystery greater than Mithras and Cybele, He revealed to us God in Man and Man in God. Christ’s triumph was not a triumph of reason over unreason, it was a triumph of charity over the ecstasy of cruelty and unbridled sexual license.
Liberalism represents the return of the mystery religions, through the sacred negro. The liberals, in their mystery religion, worship cruelty and sexual license; they cannot be reasoned out of their religion. They have rejected the Light of the World; all things are lawful once that rejection becomes your religion. “No light reaches eyes which regard blindness as clearsightedness; no remorse affects a soul which erects barbarism into patriotism, and which sanctions murder with duty.” (Taine)
In 2016, when the liberals were taken by surprise by Trump’s victory, they revealed, without the usual subterfuges, the essence of their faith. They openly, through Black Lives Matter and Antifa, and through the COVID-19 virus, sanctioned the murder of whites. And they were unopposed. They successfully painted Trump as a real mean man who was opposed to the light of liberalism, but he was no such man. Trump was and is a liberal who wants to reinstate a few Christian fumes into the body of liberalism. That might have been possible in 1960, but not now. Satan goes forward; he does not go back. The moderate liberals have latched onto an auxiliary doctrine of liberalism, which is demon-cracy, and made it the sum total of their religious faith. That is why they continue to blather on about voting the scoundrels out, even after the scoundrels have shown they do not believe in ‘one man, one vote’ democracy. They believe that a vote that does not serve mad-dog liberalism is not a vote. The mad-dog liberals adhere to the satanic essence of their faith; they will not be deterred by outward forms. They will use the Constitution and the demon-cratic process only so long as they serve their faith; when such outward forms no longer serve their faith, they will discard those forms. Obama’s election was allowed to take place because his election served liberalism. Trump’s election did not serve liberalism, so he was barred from being re-elected. That is always the way it shall be in Liberaldom. The liberals’ revelatory faith is directly opposed to the Christian faith. The two entities cannot peacefully co-exist. When conservatives turn all their faces away from the January 6th protestors, when they bid us recite the litany, “We are not racist, we are non-violent,” they bid us accept the rule of the liberals and their satanic gods in perpetuity.
Do the moderate liberals, the News Max type of conservatives, really oppose liberalism? They differ with the liberals on many issues, but do they oppose the onward march toward Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth? No, they do not. Where your treasure lies, so lies your heart. If a gang of murdering barbarians attack my house, seeking to put my family to the sword, and my neighbors say, “We are against robbery and murder, but we will not fight against robbers and murderers. We will wait until an election comes up, and we will vote against robbers and murderers, and we will abide by the elections’ results, even though the robbers and murderers are the people counting the ballots,” then I know what my neighbors are – they are moderate liberals who “may be used for wrong, but are useless for right.”
It’s a truly disgusting spectacle to see ‘conservatives’ continuing to dialogue with their liberal brethren who are feasting on the blood of white people. By the rules of the conservatives’ blasphemous, demon-cratic religion — that what is right is determined by a majority vote — the liberals do not have a right to rule, but still the conservatives continue to conserve demon-cracy and condemn all those who oppose demon-cracy. Burke refused to recognize the regicide Jacobins as the legitimate rulers of France. We should also refuse to recognize the regicide liberals as the legitimate rulers of our nation.
Nation is a moral essence, not a geographical arrangement, or a denomination of the nomenclator. France, though out of her territorial possession, exists; because the sole possible claimant, I mean the proprietary, and the Government to which the proprietary adheres, exists and claims. God forbid, that if you were expelled from your house by ruffians and assassins, that I should call the material walls, doors and windows of __________, the ancient and honourable family of __________. Am I to transfer to the intruders, who not content to turn you out naked to the world, would rob you of your very name, all the esteem and respect I owe to you? The Regicides in France are not France. France is out of her bounds, but the kingdom is the same…
This example we shall give, if, instead of adhering to our fellows in a cause which is an honour to us all, we abandon the lawful Government and lawful corporate body of France, to hunt for a shameful and ruinous fraternity with this odious usurpation that disgraces civilized society and the human race. –Letters on a Regicide Peace
Even if Biden had won the majority of votes in a fair election as Obama did, the election would have been an invalid election. All American elections are invalid for the same reason that there are no valid elections in France or in any of the European countries. They are invalid because democracy is demon-cracy; it is from hell. The liberals hold that any government that is not a demon-cracy is not a legitimate government, but the exact opposite is the case. No government that is not grounded in pietas, which is part of the “unbought grace of life,” is a valid government. All the nations of Europe were once grounded in pietas, and our own anti-nation once had a small European remnant that took their stand against the liberal leviathan in the name of pietas—the love of their own in and through the Savior.
I suppose now that typewriters have gone the way of the horse and buggy, the phrase, “he didn’t adjust the typewriter,” has gone out of our vernacular language. But I still use the term to describe my failure to adjust to the changing times. I have failed to adjust the typewriter during the transfer from the ‘fumes of Christianity’ culture in which I grew up to the ‘death of the fumes of Christianity’ culture and the institutionalization of Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth. In the ‘fumes’ culture of the 1950s and 1960s, liberals were not as blatant about their intent to destroy every last remnant of white Christian Europe. But as the fumes died out, the liberals dispensed with their subterfuges because they no longer feared any opposition to liberalism. All resistance to liberalism has ceased; that was made abundantly clear when the conservatives accepted the verdict of the fraudulent election. It’s difficult to comprehend, to adjust the typewriter, but that is the current state of the European people: they have been desouled by the ‘image of the beast in man’ culture of liberalism.
The greatest danger to the European people is not the mad-dog liberals, it is the moderate liberals in church and state. And by greatest danger, I do not mean that the moderate liberals – the conservatives – are as morally reprehensible as the mad-dog liberals. Far from it, the moderate liberals are not, as the mad-dog liberals are, outside the ken of humanity, they have many humane and noble instincts. But that is why they are so dangerous. They mix some Christian fumes into their liberalism, and we are tempted, because we are lonely, to settle for their moderate liberalism. But the Dream of the Rood Christians ultimately must recoil in horror from the moderate liberals just as we would recoil in horror from a reptile lover who tells us we can sleep with venomous, poisonous snakes without being bitten. The dialogues with liberals, the great talk shows, are predicated on the assumption that we can all be snake charmers, we can mesmerize deadly cobras with our incredible, superior reason. Or, to put it in Shakespearean terms, “You bid me seek redemption from the devil.”
Lincoln said it all when he made his Gettysburg address. He joined America with regicide, Jacobin France when he spoke of a nation, “conceived in liberty” (liberty from God) and, “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal” (but some, the sacred negroes, are more equal than others, because such men are gods who point us to the ‘image of the beast in man’ culture of the archangel Satan). Our forefathers cannot be the men Lincoln references – the Jeffersons, the Franklins, and the Paines. Our forefathers are the men with the Dream of the Rood in their hearts; they are the antique Europeans, and they are the apostles and St. Paul, who bid us adhere to His word and keep His image, not the image of the beast in man, before our eyes.
The great enemies of Christian Europe were and are the liberals, but the liberals’ allies in the war against the ‘image of God in man’ culture takes us, at first, by surprise. The ‘Christian’ clergy have always been the enemies of the Europeans’ Dream of the Rood. Why? They have stood and still stand in opposition to Christ’s Europe because they do not believe the light of Christ’s love penetrated to the core of European culture. They believe, with St. Augustine, that there is the city of God, which consists of the structure called the Church and the parchments put out by Church officials, and there is the city of man, which is the city of sin and desolation. But doesn’t such a theology assume that God’s grace is an illusion? If Christ’s love cannot turn human hearts to Him, what are we doing here on earth? Are we only supposed to know God through the computer printouts of the clergymen? Small wonder that the liberals have triumphed over the Christian Europeans. The liberals have a savior while the European people have… What do they have? They want to cling to a few Christian fumes while maintaining a place in Liberaldom. But the liberals’ gods are jealous gods. They do not want to share their place in the liberals’ trinity with Jesus Christ. There cannot be, there must not be, two redeemers. The liberals have overmanned the conservatives because the conservatives want to serve two masters. It can’t be done. It is Christ or the negro. The liberals have taken their stand while the conservatives have taken no stand, and by taking no stand they have made their choice – they serve the sacred negro, and through the sacred negro they serve Satan. The minstrel in the old hymn asks Mary if she knows that, “When you kiss your little Baby, you kissed the face of God?” We need to ask the men with the great minds in the ranks of the clergy and the conservative pundits, “Do you know that when you reject His Europe, the people with the hearts of flesh, you reject Christ?”
A few years after I got out of college, I stopped at the house of a professor I had become friends with during my college years. During the course of our, “what have you been doing over the last few years” conversation, I mentioned that I had gone over to the ranks of the men and women he considered his enemies – the Christian Europeans. I knew that such news would not delight him, but I was very surprised at his vehemence. He eventually asked me to leave his house. Before I left, there was an exchange between the militant atheist, my former professor, and the Christian European, myself, that I shall never forget. He wanted to turn the existence of God into a philosophical debate. He brought up all the false defenses of Aslan he had heard during the course of his career, the Thomistic apologetics and other such ‘Christian’ explanations of the ways of God. I agreed with all his criticisms. And my agreement only increased his hatred. How could I agree with his refutation of Christian apologetics and still adhere to the Christian faith? I took my stand with Alyosha Karamazov and pointed to the mysterious stranger, the God-Man, Jesus Christ.
Rational, democratic man has rejected the mystery of the God-Man who promised us a different liberty, a liberty diametrically opposed to liberalism:
And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read. And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. –Luke 4: 16-19
Liberalism in all of its many guises, clerical, moderate, and mad-dog, must be rejected because it is an ideology forged by Satan to destroy Christ’s people. The unbought grace of Christ’s Europe has been spent. The fumes of Christianity have disappeared — never to return? The head says never again, but the heart seeks His Europe and only His Europe. It is the mystery of Christ’s God-Manhood that shall sustain us in our battle with the liberal leviathan. In that mystery, charity and manhood are united. What Burke called the charity of honor is what sets the European culture on a different level from all the pagan cultures and our modern satanic culture. Achilles dragged the body of Hector three times around the walls of Troy after he had triumphed over him in battle. Achilles had the honor of a pagan, but he lacked charity. Prince Hal honors his foe, the noble Hotspur, after he has defeated him in battle because he has that charity of honor. And the modern liberals? They do not have the pagan’s honor or the Christian European’s charity. They are treacherous, immoral monsters of dire cruelty and evil. It is difficult to stay united to the dead, nay, it is an impossibility if we do not love much. The charity that never faileth, the charity that the God-Man imparts to us will keep us bound to our honored dead and to the Savior who rose again on the third day. Never, never shall we forsake the Europeans’ Dream of the Rood, because that Dream is Truth, it is the vision of the Divine Charity, of the God-Man, who draws us to Him in defiance of the hell of liberalism.+
I was unable to post on June 5th because of internet problems beyond my control. I do not believe that computers are intrinsically evil; if I did I would never use them. But on the whole I do not think the computer age has been a blessing. The great mistake made by the computer enthusiasts in the ranks of the conservatives, men such as George Gilder, was the mistake of assuming that technical advances were good in and of themselves, independent of the human beings using the technologies. As the European people regressed morally, they became a post-Christian people with advanced technology. The result has been a tyranny unequaled in the less technological ages. The internet tech giants are able to exercise a leftist tyranny over the European people that makes Stalin and Hitler look like benevolent dictators.
I will not cease my attack, via the pen, against the liberal leviathan until God calls me home. So if you don’t see a post on a given Saturday, it means I have shuffled off this mortal coil or I am, once again, having internet problems.
As regards this week’s post – I once, in my student days, shared a train seat with an Englishwoman in her mid-forties who was doing a one-year stint in the United States for an English company she represented. In the course of a long conversation, mainly about her native land, she confided to me that in all her travels throughout Europe and the United States, the American people were the only people who got upset if you told them you didn’t want to be a citizen of their country. She didn’t understand the American exceptionalist mentality, which was anti-pietas. I told her there once had been a segment of Americans in the old South who loved their nation simply because it was “their own, their native land,” but on the whole, she was right: Our people loved a utopian ideal, not a homeland. In spite of all that we have become, our ‘conservatives’ still refuse to reject American exceptionalism. They are still American Undines. When will ensoulment take place? When we see His Europe and say, “This is my own, my native land.”
The conservatives have latched onto new evidence, provided by scientists, that tells us the COVID-19 virus was and is a man-made virus that the Chinese communists cooked up in their laboratories in Wuhan in order to kill as many Americans as possible. My reaction to that report is the same as Horatio’s reaction to Hamlet when Hamlet tells him what his father, come back from the grave, has told him:
Ham. There’s ne-er a villain dwelling in all Denmark– But he’s an arrant knave.
Hor. There needs no ghost, my lord, come from the grave To tell us this.
I need no scientists to tell me that the Chinese communists are evil.
If you believe that communism is an evil ideology, if you believe the historical record of nations who hold to that ideology, you should not need scientific evidence to convince you that the Chinese communists were and are involved in germ warfare. All things are lawful to those who believe there is no God, so why should we doubt for one moment that the Chinese communists are evil men with evil intentions? We will doubt that obvious piece of history if we are religious atheists, if we are liberals who believe in the abstract intellect, the sacred negro, and science.
If we turn to the liberals’ Holy Ghost, which is science, to refute the liberals’ narrative of the good, the pure, and the beneficent Chinese communists, we will fail to refute the liberals. We will fail, because there is no truth in science — she is a whore who will serve whomever pays her. The leftist liberals can come up with their own scientists to refute the moderate liberals’ scientists. Pilate asked Christ, “What is truth?” and then consented to the crucifixion of The Truth. The liberals are the embodiment of the Jews who sought to crucify The Truth, and the moderate conservatives are the embodiment of Pontius Pilate who consented to that crucifixion because he needed empirical, scientific evidence before he could believe in The Truth enough to oppose the very real ‘this world only’ power of the Sanhedrin. But what is our faith if it can be seen with the empirical eye? It is not faith, it is a reed for every new scientific wind that blows.
The scholastic era in the Church marked a great shift in the interior eye of the European Everyman. Prior to the scholastic era, the high Middle Ages, the Dream of the Rood was the vision of the European people. Christ was above the natural world, He was our Savior and He was our kith and kin.
Now I bid thee, my loved man, to declare this vision unto men; reveal in words that it is the glorious tree on which Almighty God suffered for the many sins of mankind and the old deeds of Adam.
There He tasted death; yet God rose up again with His mighty power to help men. Then He ascended to heaven; hither again will the Lord Himself make His way to this world to seek mankind on the day of judgment, Almighty God and His angels with Him, when He who has power of judgment will judge each one according as he merits in this fleeting life. No one can be without fear there at the word the Lord says: He will ask before the multitude where the man is who for God’s sake would taste bitter death, as He aforetime did on the cross; but then they will be afraid, and think little of what they begin to say to Christ. No one need be terrified there who erstwhile bears in his breast the best of signs, but each soul which desires to dwell with the Lord must through the cross seek the kingdom which is far from earth.
–The Dream of the Rood
When the inner eye ceases to behold the vision of the Dream of the Rood, but instead is overcome by the outer eye which looks upon nature and nature’s god, the Holy Ghost is rendered obsolete, He becomes nothing. It did not happen overnight, the worship of science as the true comforter, but it did come about. The two democratic revolutions, the American Revolution and the French Revolution, codified that reordering of the Europeans’ spiritual vision. When God is scientized, when He is studied with the empirical eye, He becomes an impersonal God, a remote God that people turn to as they turn to a philosophical construct or a self-help book. But He is no longer the God whom St. Paul encountered on the road to Damascus. And that God is the only God who can sustain us in this world and give us eternal life in the next world.
Communism is a derivative of American and French Jacobinism, and they are derivatives of the scientizing of God. When God is scientized, man becomes scientized, because man is created in the image of God; thus, a false view of God gives us a false view of man. And the men of science, acting on the false view of God, can proceed to analyze, categorize, and dissect “poor, bare unaccommodated man” out of existence. The conservatives tell us that we should resist communism. Why should we resist communism? The answer always is: it is a bad economic system and it is opposed to liberty. But democratic capitalism is a bad economic system, and it is opposed to liberty as well. Let me digress. My great-grandfather on the Welsh side of my family came over to this country when he was a baby. Obviously, he didn’t have any say in the matter, he came over to the land of liberty with his parents. At eight years of age, he became a breaker boy in the mines, and he worked six fourteen-hour days a week from age eight until his death at age sixty. Now, in those years between eighteen and sixty, he married, fathered children, and had Sundays off, so his life was not unmitigated misery. But if we are looking at the entity called capitalism, which is an offspring of the democratic way that American conservatives are always touting, is the misery index of Russian communism and of American capitalism that different? I would prefer the life of a Russian peasant under communism to the life of a coal miner, but I would prefer the life of a factory worker in the U.S., as miserable as that might be, to life under communism. And yes, American capitalism was humanized, the work hours were shortened for the laboring classes, and a middle class came into being. But still, we can’t leave the issue of the scientizing of man. There is a pernicious evil behind American democracy; it is a system of government and economics that is opposed to the European people’s Dream of the Rood.
If we are picking the greater evil, it seems that the iron fist of communism, which is the Jacobinism of Robespierre, is worse than the seductive, veiled evil of American demon-cracy, which is the Jacobinism of the French Directory after the fall of Robespierre, but both systems are evil manifestations of a material-based view of a man and God, which makes science the new Holy Ghost. Are we permitted to choose the lesser of two evils? No, we must cleave to the Dream of the Rood and forsake communism and demon-cracy.
In our country, we can see the fatal consequences of choosing the seemingly lesser of two evils. The ‘lesser’ of two evils can shift ground, the seductive veil can be removed to reveal an iron fist. Whenever the liberal demon-crats feel that their empire is being challenged, they become hysterical, like an evil woman who finds that her feminine charms no longer charm, and they resort to the iron fist. This happened in America in 1860 through 1877, and it happened again in 2016 through 2020. And the white grazers always allow the leftist demon-crats to go back to the seduction, even though the demon-crats have shown them the evil behind the demon-cratic façade. I recall seeing an old gangster movie (there is a great deal of practical wisdom in the B-Westerns and the gangster B-movies) in which a wounded gangster sought refuge in a hideout for gangsters run by a gigantic female gangster. The Amazon Ma Parker started to strangle the wounded gangster, but when she found out that he did not have the money from his robbery on his person, she stopped strangling him and tried to behave like Florence Nightingale. Of course the wounded gangster did not believe in the sudden transformation of the Amazonian gangster. He waited for the right moment and then eliminated her. That was the wise and prudent thing to do, but the gangster had a great advantage: he did not have a mystical faith in the goodness of all Ma Parkers who ran a refuge for gangsters. “Yet though you slay me, still I shall trust in thee,” is the faith of the white, moderate liberals as regards the mad-dog liberals.
When the Southern people were sufficiently ‘reconstructed’ and allowed back into the Union, upon what terms were they allowed to come back into the Union? They were allowed to come back into the Union under the original demand of the Northern Jacobins – “You must accept the enfranchisement of the negro.” And of course what was implicit in that enfranchisement of the negro was the worship of the negro as the second person of the new Trinity. The mini-rebellion of 2016 was not a full-blown counterrevolution, as was the case in 1860; it was a small protest against the liberals’ blatant leftism, but it was put down with fire and sword because the liberals, having obtained absolute power, were not going to allow even a slight digression from ‘the truth and the way,’ which is their kingdom of hell on earth.
It is a tragic spectacle when the conservatives blather on about the demon-cratic way and our great star-spangled-banner-American heritage while the liberals enjoy the fruits of an uncontested, fraudulent election victory and openly canonize black criminals while crucifying all the white policemen who try to prevent black savagery. But that shall always be the American way so long as the American way is opposed to the European people’s ancient customs and manners. Those customs and manners were grounded in Christ’s love for his people and their response to His love.
There was, until the 20th century, great resistance to the new world order which bid us turn to the new Holy Ghost of science instead of the Holy Ghost of Christianity. The lay of the European minstrels (see Nineteenth Century Way to God and The Sacred Heritage) told us of another world of charity, honor, and love that could only be abandoned at the cost of our souls. We will always believe a lie if we think that His charity of honor, the charity that never faileth, can be relegated to the historical archives, while ‘real’ history, the history of the beloved sacred negroes and the onward march of leftist feminists, sexual perverts, and mass murderers (abortionists), is applauded and lauded in our public ceremonies as part of the fabric of our nation.
We cannot resist the onward leftist march of the mad-dog liberals by appealing to our leftist American heritage. That heritage is not a heritage, it is a base betrayal of our sacred heritage, our Christian European heritage. Why are the men and women arrested on January 6th for trying to stop a leftist military coup being tortured in prison without a conservative outcry? Why was Derek Chauvin crucified without a conservative outcry? Why do the conservatives insist that we must not be racist and we must be non-violent? The answer to all those questions is that the conservatives are not conservative, they are the members of the Jacobin Directory who signed on to the murder of Louis XVI but finally opposed Robespierre when he came after them.
When Thomas Molnar reviewed Russell Kirk’s book The Conservative Mind, he said that Kirk had proved there were some conservatives in America, but he had failed to prove that they ever had any influence. When has our government ever taken the side of Christian Europe against the Jacobins? During the French Revolution we supported the Jacobins. In the Civil War our Jacobin government destroyed the Christian South. In World War I we supported the side of the anarchists who struck at the last Christian empire in Europe. And in World War II, we chose to support the Russian communists, when a Christian nation would have fought Nazism and communism. Didn’t we finally get it right in Korea and Vietnam? No, we didn’t, because we didn’t fight communism in the name of Christ, we fought it in the name of demon-cratic capitalism. It is not possible for a man of honor to cling to the anti-Christian, anti-European star-spangled myth of American demon-cracy. That is why the liberals have worked so hard to destroy the white man’s code of honor. If you demonize honor, chivalry, and charity, all the virtues stemming from the white Christians’ code, you will place the Europeans under the mantle of science, and science has no honor. In the trinity of the abstract intellect, the sacred negro, and science, we have seen Satan placed on the throne of Europe. He cannot be humanized, he can only be dethroned. And a dethroning will only take place when the European people return to their first love, the God-Man, Jesus Christ.
My own struggles to come to terms with the liberals’ new Holy Ghost mirror Dostoyevsky’s experience. The forces of modernity seemed to be correct: An intelligent man, a man of reason and science, could not believe that Christ was the Son of the Living God. But still, there was that “radiant personality of Christ.” My dream, my inner eye, saw Christ and only Christ standing between me and all the “heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to.” Beyond cold reason, beyond the sacred negro, and beyond science, is the God-Man, who has left us a comforter infinitely greater than science. Do not our hearts burn within us for something more than the demonic forces of Jacobinism-communism and demon-cracy? I cannot believe that Satan can completely eradicate, through the new trinity, our love for the God-Man. “If this be error,” if Satan can kill all longing for the God-Man in the hearts of the European people, still, I shall hold onto my Dream of the Rood, “even to the edge of doom.”
Ever since the Garden of Eden, Satan has prowled about the world, seeking the ruin of souls. Through ideology, by making God and then man an object of the natural world to be studied and dissected, Satan has achieved his greatest success. I once, while teaching Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, which is not even my favorite of Shakespeare’s plays, became so overcome with the charity of heart that could see all our faults and still love us with an overwhelming love, that I wept uncontrollably in front of a stunned group of adolescents. Shakespeare’s unflinching faith that our humanity was linked to a charity that surpasses pure reason, is the faith that brings us to the divine humanity of our Lord and Savior. When we are connected to the culture of His divine humanity, the condemned, racist culture of old Europe, we feel something stir within us that makes us recoil from modernity and cling to that vision we see with the interior eye of the heart. Something momentous is occurring in the European nations. Satan is consolidating his power, and it seems there is nothing left in the European people’s souls that can help them resist Satan. We are bound upon a wheel of fire that our own “tears do scald like molten lead.” Only the Dream of the Rood, our European vision, can put out that fire and dry our tears. +