Cross & Sword

Posted on June 7, 2014 by cwny

Firmer he grasp’d the Cross of strife,
Until the opposing bank he gain’d.—

Walter Scott

_____

In our beleaguered Western fortress we are not only closely infested from without but increasingly infested from within. To triumph we shall need all our courage and wits about us – and our own wits, not somebody else’s wits. A brainwashed man is as much shamed as a violated woman; more defiled than the defiler. He is like a mentally circumcised Janissary in the forefront of the battle against his own white Christian kith and kin. – Anthony Jacob

__________

There are currently no mainstream news outlets that are not in favor of the extermination of the white race. Fox News merely differs with its liberal rivals over the amount of megaton bombs to drop on non-democratic Arab nations and the tax rates. The survival of the white race is not their concern. It has been thus for quite some time, at least since the 1960s: the news media is against the white Europeans even though they themselves are white Europeans. What has changed is the availability of information about the techno-barbarian and colored war against white people. There is currently much more information, via the internet, about the colored onslaught on the white race than there was in the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s. And yet, despite the greater availability of information about white genocide, the situation of whites has deteriorated mightily since the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s. Why?

The first reason is that white people are much more thoroughly indoctrinated with a sense of their own worthlessness than they were fifty years ago. When a white hears of colored atrocities against whites he – if he is a liberal – rejoices in the violence and labels it “good violence,” in contrast to bad violence which would be white retaliation against black savages. If a white is a grazer, he doesn’t rejoice in the colored atrocities against white people, but he does acquiesce to them because he has been trained to treat such atrocities as acts of God – the black god – whose ways are inscrutable and not to be questioned. The grazer simply hopes that he will be spared the fate of the slaughtered white cattle that used to graze next to him in the pasture.

The second reason that white genocide speeds steadily onward despite the greater availability of information about black atrocities is because human beings are very herd-like. They need someone to lead them. If the white grazers still trust the many headed hydra of Liberaldom – church, state, press, government – or even if they just trust one head of that many headed hydra, they will not be able to put the information about black-on-white crime to any use. Take the church-going grazer, for instance. Some years back a man of my acquaintance experienced one of those all too familiar negro-induced tragedies. His young son was shot and killed in front of his own house by some black barbarians who just wanted to kill a white boy. Once his son was buried, the father, his older sons, and a few of his friends wanted to kill the black scum that murdered his son. But the parish priest intervened. “You must forgive, you must understand their rage, etc…” The outraged whites were pacified, the young white boy was unavenged, and colored barbarities increased in the neighborhood of the murdered white boy. That story was told to me, with pride, by the liberal priest who talked the white men out of violent retribution. White grazers will make irreverent jokes about clergy, psychiatrists, military leaders, professors, politicians, and news men, but in the end they have a great deal of respect for such authority figures. And if those in authority do not see anything wrong with white genocide then the white grazers will not see anything wrong with white genocide, no matter how many atrocity stories appear on the internet.

Isn’t it good to respect authority; isn’t that the mark of the white man, that he respects the laws of his nation? No, blind respect for the powers that be, independent of their respect for the European people and their Christian faith, is not the mark of the white man. It is the mark of a coward, a dishonorable wretch and a loathsome toady. George Fitzhugh’s remarks are apropos:

Neither individuals nor societies can govern themselves, any more than the mouse can live in the exhausted receiver, or the clown lift himself by the lapel of his pantaloons. The South is governed by the necessity of keeping its negroes in order, which preserves a healthy conservative public opinion. Had the negroes votes, the necessity would be removed, because the interest of the governing class would cease to be conservative… We are the friend of popular government, but only so long as conservatism is the interest of the governing class.

It is quite obvious that the governing classes throughout the European nations are not interested in conserving the Christian traditions and culture of the European people, nor are they interested in conserving the European people. Quite the opposite is the case. The governing classes of the European nations are concerned mainly with the destruction of every last remnant of old Europe, including the white-skinned Europeans that are still left there. That they desire the complete annihilation of white Europeans is no longer kept a secret by the governing classes of Europe. Politicos such as Lord Mandelson tell us outright that they want to supplant the white Europeans and replace them with colored barbarians.

Is this a governing class that should be supported? It seems obvious to me that a governing class that wants the blood of its people should suffer the death that they seek to inflict on their people. Of course the liberals do not consider themselves as traitors to their people, because they do not look on white people as their people. They have only one people: the colored people of the earth. It is the duty of every liberal, and there are no non-liberals in the governing classes of the European nations, to work for the extermination of the white race.

If simply supplying white grazers with the information about black on white crime is ineffective, what will be effective? There is only one effective remedy for white genocide – white men must love their people. Until the spiritual obstruction which makes the white man incapable of love is removed from white hearts, the blood-soaked colored tide will continue to engulf and destroy the white race.

If it was simply a physical blockage of an artery, something that could be removed by an experienced surgeon, then we could have a quick fix. But a spiritual blockage of the arteries cannot be easily remedied. The men or women who have the blockage cannot see or feel it, so they go along with their lives, oblivious to the fact that their hearts are devoid of that spirit which makes them human beings instead of cattle. They must reclaim their hearts, because cattle just allow themselves to be passively led along to the slaughterhouse.

There is no doubt that the Catholic priests and the Protestant ministers of the Gospel of Christ have led and continue to lead white people to the slaughterhouses where black barbarians kill them without one touch of remorse or guilt. As cattle to the slaughterhouse professionals, are white people to their black gods who slay them for their sport. It’s no good to rescind the Europeans’ covenant with Christ in order to free them from their suicidal state of somnolent passivity in the face of evil, because in point of fact the Europeans’ current state of moral paralysis is the result of their broken covenant with Christ. Theologians are not God’s anointed. They stand athwart the path to God, which leads through the labyrinth of the human heart, and tell the Christian pilgrims that God is not to be found at the hearth fires of a man’s kith and kin, but in the abstractions of the theologians who know God through nature. Once the pilgrim steps away from the thorn-laden, arduous path through the labyrinths of the human heart and accepts the theologians smooth and easy way to God, he is on the road to suicidal death-in-life somnolence. Men of heart, Christian men who have seen Christ in the hearth fires of their kith and kin, in contrast to the hell-stoked rationalist fires of Unitarian theologians such as Harriet Beecher Stowe, do not suffer their kith and kin to be exterminated just because their local clergymen tells them that white people do not exist as a people or that the Christian concept of sacrificial love entails the base betrayal of one’s own kind.

We must apply the “you ride with them” principle to the church-going anti-European “Christians,” if we want to get past the mere reporting of the black atrocities against whites and move to a counter-revolutionary attack on the negro-worshipping liberals and their colored gods. Our Lord cut through all the Pharisaical red tape when He told us:

Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

The false Christians found that loving one’s God with one’s whole heart was difficult. So they decided merely to affirm Him with their minds. Then, in the name of their abstract God, the false Christians invented an abstract neighbor to love. It is difficult to actually love our real neighbors, our kith and kin, because they are not perfect creatures who let us ‘help’ them so we can feel an ego-maniacal rush. ‘Better to love an abstract negro neighbor than my actual neighbor,’ says the treacherous, self-deceiving, spiritually bankrupt modern clergyman. So long as the European remains in spiritual servitude to such creatures, creatures who advise a man to hate his own kind in the name of an abstract, false Christ figure of their own invention, he will remain in a state of spiritual somnolence, incapable of responding to the fiery cross which bids him rise and ride in defense of his kith and kin. But once the white man renews his covenant with His people and the Christ who imparts to human hearts, not one single institution of negro-worshipping, Jacobin Europe will be left standing. +

Posted in Blood faith, Christian counter-attack, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Tagged , | Comments Off on Cross & Sword

Laying to Rest the Speculative European

Posted on May 31, 2014 by cwny

“I can live no longer by thinking.”

– Orlando, As You Like it

__________

The democratic movements throughout Europe in the 1840s were extensions of the French Revolution that Burke warned would envelop all of Europe if the Jacobin snake was scotched but not killed. The so-called Civil War in the United States was our extension of the French Revolution: the Jacobin North made war on the Christian South. Though all the democratic bloodbaths were couched in high-sounding words such as freedom, equality, fraternity, and emancipation, the intent in each and every democratic movement was the same – to supplant the Christian faith, the guiding light of the European people, and replace that faith with the darkness of liberalism. And by World War I the Jacobins’ utopian dream had become a reality. It’s significant that Woodrow Wilson justified his anti-nation’s entrance into the war with the words, “The world must be made safe for democracy.” He did not say that the European nations needed to become democracies; that would have implied a pre-1840s Europe. He said that the world needed to be made safe for democracy, which implied, correctly, that the European nations had become liberal democracies and were now an aggressive, expanding power determined to destroy all the non-democratic elements – translation: non-liberal elements – in their own and other nations. And let us have no doubt that when we are talking about democracies we are talking about utopian, liberal states completely opposed to European Christianity. They might be compatible with speculative Christianity, but they are not in line with bred-in-the-bone European Christianity, which is the only Christianity that St. Paul and our European forefathers knew.

The liberals came into power promising that they could usher in a perfect world. Have they done so? No, they haven’t. From my perspective, which is that of the antique Europeans, they have not only failed to improve mankind’s lot here on earth, they have also taken away men’s hope for a better lot in another world. But how, having failed to deliver on their promises of utopian bliss, have the liberals managed to maintain themselves in power for over one hundred years. No state, no matter how totalitarian-ly efficient, can last over one hundred years without a great deal of genuine support from the governed. So again, we must ask: How have the liberals maintained themselves in power for over one hundred years?

We start with the primary seductive rationale of all utopian states. The utopians promise that if the great unwashed mass of humanity will follow their guidance, a new paradisiacal state of existence will be the permanent lot of mankind. And when the paradisiacal state fails to materialize, what happens then? That’s easy: you blame the recalcitrant reactionaries, whether they be unborn babies, aristocrats, monarchists, Christians, white people, old people, or some other scapegoat, for impeding the march to utopia. This is why the utopian is never fazed when aristocrats, white people, or unborn babies are slaughtered. Such creatures are in the way of utopia, which is always about to come into fruition but somehow always eludes us.

It is no easy operation to eradicate humanity from the human breast. What Shakespeare calls “the compunctious visitings of nature” will sometimes knock at their hearts, and protest against their murderous speculations. But they have a means of compounding with their nature. Their humanity is not dissolved. They only give it a long prorogation. They are ready to declare, that they do not think two thousand years too long a period for the good that they pursue. It is remarkable, that they never see any way to their projected good but by the road of some evil. Their imagination is not fatigued with the contemplation of human suffering through the wild waste of centuries added to centuries of misery and desolation. Their humanity is at their horizon—and, like the horizon, it always flies before them. The geometricians, and the chemists, bring, the one from the dry bones of their diagrams, and the other from the soot of their furnaces, dispositions that make them worse than indifferent about those feelings and habitudes, which are the support of the moral world.

But while the liberals are hardening their hearts and those of their adherents to the sufferings of the recalcitrants, whose sacrificial blood will build utopia, they must deliver something to their devotees to assure them that utopian bliss is still coming. Russian communism did not fail because the Russian people wanted to return to Christianity. It failed because the communist leaders were unable to give their people enough comfort stops on the road to utopia. The Russian communists were beaten by their Jacobin competitors in the United States and Europe, who were and still are keeping their people in check with comfort stops along the utopian way. Russia is now playing an aggressive catch-up game with the other European utopias, trying to shift from the naked-fist utopianism of communism to the seductive, subtler, comfort stop utopianism of the West. The modern Russian adjustment is much like the French Jacobins adjustment once they cast off Robespierre. They are still hard-hearted utopians, but they are now trying to use the church and the democratic process, like the other European nations do, to advance their satanic agenda rather than using the muggish, thuggish tactics of their communist predecessors.

Utopianism is a European phenomenon, because utopian thinking only rears its ugly head among post-Christian people. The colored races, having never taken Christianity to heart, do not indulge in utopian thinking. Every utopian system is an inversion of Christianity. The current utopian model, which is basically the same in all of the post-Christian European nations, runs along the following lines: Life is a pilgrimage toward utopia. If we look to the end of the journey, we see a great throne with a negro sitting upon it. He presides over a people who are all brown and black and who are celebrating as the worshippers of the biblical golden calf celebrated. Along the way we see the comfort stops, positioned where the crosses and kneelers used to be on the old Christian roads. The first stop is at one of the Christian churches. Here the pilgrim is told that Christ is not who the old, evil Europeans said he was. He is not the Savior, he is a forerunner of the black man, who is the savior of all the people of the world, with the exception of white people. What is the black savior saving mankind from? He is saving them from white people and from a false vision of Christ. The ‘real’ Christ, the forerunner of the black messiah, does not condemn personal sins such as the ones listed in the Ten Commandments. The new Christ condemns social sins such as sexism, homophobia, and above all, racism.

Some pilgrims skip the Christian church altogether and go to the secular psychiatrists’ station of the new cross. It makes no difference: the psychiatrist and the church men both speak the same jargon. Faith, as they define it, is merely a speculative exercise of the brain. So why not adopt a guilt-free, natural faith that allows a man to become a happy, participating member of a Babylonian kingdom of nature? And after this life? The church men and the psychiatrists unite with the multi-racial gypsies of Babylon:

“To be resolved into the elements,” said the hardened atheist, pressing his fettered arms against his bosom; “my hope, trust, and expectation is that the mysterious frame of humanity shall melt into the general mass of nature, to be recompounded in the other forms with which she daily supplies those which daily disappear, and return under different forms – the watery particles to streams and showers, the earthy parts to enrich their mother earth, the airy portions to wanton in the breeze, and those of fire to supply the blaze of Aldebaran and his brethren. – In this faith have I lived, and I will die in it!” –Quentin Durward

Perhaps this modern obsession with saving mother earth is related to the liberals’ new faith in their future absorption into “the general mass of nature.”

Is it necessary to list all the comfort stops along the liberal way? The sporting comfort stop is a vital one and so is the scientific comfort stop. The modern liberal must keep all the comfort stops open and accessible to the modern age Europeans in order to avoid falling on the same rocks on which Russian communism plunged to its death. And the liberal cannot afford to let go of his personal god, the sacred negro, because he sustains the liberals’ comfort stops and his utopian vision of the future. We are all marching toward the negroization of the world. The negro has become the replacement for Christ, and the various liberal comfort stations have become the conduits to the negro just as the antique European’s fidelity to their racial and familial hearth fire kept them connected to Christ.

There are other competing utopian visions to the current liberal, negro-worshipping utopian vision, but the alternative utopias have failed to catch on as the liberals’ Babylonian utopia has. The neo-pagans, for instance, project a future devoid of white Christians and colored barbarians in which they, the men of intellect, rule over some kind of soulless world of computers, science labs, and Viking sperm banks. The neo-pagan utopians do not worship the negro as the liberal utopians do, but they do share the liberals’ hatred for the antique Europeans who believed that Christ was the son of God. If He be not risen, I don’t see any difference between the liberals’ garbage heap or the neo-pagans’ garbage heap.

The irony of this age of utopias, of the liberal left and the neo-pagan left, is that the lives of the utopians are sustained by the Christian culture of the antique Europeans whom they despise. While amidst their false communities and their heathen churches the utopians must occasionally catch a glimpse of or feel a gentle wind from the Christ-centered, life-sustaining culture of the antique Europeans, or else they will completely wither and die, because there is no spiritual life in the Christ-hating, European-hating cultures of the utopians.

The utopian death in life cultures, with their treacherous comfort stations, use the tactics of the devil to keep their adherents dreaming of utopia while they live in hell,

But tis strange;
And oftentimes to win us to our harm,
The instruments of darkness tell us truths
Win us with honest trifles to betray’s
In deepest consequence.

For how long will the European people settle for the honest trifles of the comfort stations which are meant to betray them in deepest consequence, to place their bodies on the sacrificial altars of the bloody negro gods and place their souls in hell?

If, and it is a big ‘if’, the Europeans could throw off speculative living and actually live life first-hand, they would no longer be in danger of extinction. As things stand now, the Europeans are dead, because they have lost their capacity to love and hate: they can only speculate about such feelings. A man with a living, breathing heart, a non-speculative heart, would not stand by and utter inanities about being “full of grief and sorrow” at the torture murder of his people while in the same breath “forgiving” the torture murderers. A man with a heart capable of loving would hate those who murder his people and desecrate his blood faith. A true white man loves and hates with all his heart; a speculative white man has no passionate loves or hates, he merely speculates about love and hate and lives life second-hand through the colored races who are incapable of loving the good, as the Europeans once did, but have an infinite capacity for hatred, hatred of the good. That is the difference between the colored barbarians, the speculative white man, and the true white man. The colored barbarians are fueled with a satanic hatred for everything white, pure, and noble. The speculative white loves and hates second hand through the negro. He loves his black god and hates the white, speculatively of course. The ancient white man loves and hates first-hand, in a mysterious way which is unknown to the colored barbarians. The white man’s hate stems from his love of his own. When his people are threatened, he responds with a hatred for the enemy which passeth the understanding of the colored barbarians, who only know the hatred that stems from hatred, not the hatred which comes from love. “Stop! This shall not go on!,” will never be heard from a speculative white man, but it is the war cry of the bred-in-the-bone Christian European when he sees his kith and kin threatened.

Let us cease to speculate about the race problem. Let us cease bending over backwards to find the “good blacks.” And above all, let us stop trying to fight liberalism from within liberalism. We can’t vote Satanism away. “Stop! This must not go on, in the name of God, this must not go on.” There is a land for the pure and free white man, a land where there is no excuse for clerics who betray their people and their God. A land where colored barbarians are not permitted to murder and rape white people with impunity. That land is Christian Europe. If the European loves and hates with all his heart, refusing to speculate his people and his God into non-existence, then miracles will occur. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Bred in the Bone, Christianity: Neither a Theory Nor a Philosophy, Defense of the White Race, Democracy, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Utopianism | Tagged , | Comments Off on Laying to Rest the Speculative European

The Black Plague

Posted on May 24, 2014 by cwny

But you are now looking at the England within England, the real England, just as this is the real Narnia. And in that inner England no good thing is destroyed. – The Last Battle

__________

Life is good in the old Western films of the 30s, 40s, and 50s. The heroes are the white men who follow the code and keep the bad whites who do not follow the code and the colored barbarians who hate the code of the white man in line. Because the code is bred in the bone of the white cowboy heroes they don’t talk about it much. But it’s there, and it must be adhered to. In one of his magnificent later westerns, The Tall T, the great Western star, Randolph Scott, is taken prisoner by two white bad men and a half-breed. The head of the outlaw band “never dropped a hammer on a man” himself, but he lets his two henchmen do what killing needs to be done. Despite the fact that he plans on letting his henchmen kill Scott’s character, the head villain desires to separate himself in the hero’s eyes from the other two. “I’m not like those two,” the outlaw declares.

Scott’s character replies, “You ride with them.”

Well said. The Western hero has the poet’s gift of saying much with few words. Scott’s reply to his villainous captors (needless to say Scott turns the tables on his captors and kills them) is our reply to the forgiving Pope Johns of the white-hating Christian world, who tell us they are “full of grief” when whites are tortured and murdered by black barbarians but have only “loving charity and forgiveness” for the murderous black barbarians. Is this the type of charity that St. Paul writes about in 1st Corinthians 13? Hardly. Pope John’s concept of charity comes from the devil, and St. Paul’s comes from Christ. We can’t let the clerics and their soul-dead adherents deny responsibility for the torture murders of whites because they don’t actually wash their hands in the blood of the white victims, as the black barbarians do. “You ride with them, and my people’s blood is on your hands,” is our reply to the loathsome spawns of Satan who torture and murder by proxy.

There never was a proposal to exterminate the white race placed on any of the ballots in the democratic nations of European origin. And yet the extermination process is proceeding at a rapid pace. On the Brown vs. Topeka holy day of last week, we were treated to solemn black faces and solemn white faces scolding us and telling us that there were still some classrooms in the U.S. that were not diverse. Translation of that euphemism: “There are still a few white communities left. We must destroy them.” Don’t expect to see a place on your next ballot where you can vote against the extermination of the white race. That process is a given. All you’re permitted to vote for is the overseers of the extermination process.

What is occurring throughout the European nations is a horrific reenactment of the black death which claimed the lives of over one-fourth of the European people. But the medieval plague came in the form of a germ that was part of the material world. This new plague is of the soul. The executioners are very real and material, but the moral paralysis of white people, which renders them defenseless against the black barbarian plague, comes from a deeply rooted sickness of the soul. Is it a sickness unto death? Yes, it is.

An essential part of the extermination process is propaganda. We are constantly deluged with chants of “white privilege.” And many public schools feature anti-white privilege days (isn’t every day an anti-white privilege day?) where white students must do special acts of atonement for their whiteness. Some young whites, far too many, follow the anti-white advice given and take it to the logical conclusion. They commit suicide in order to save the black barbarians the trouble of murdering them. The liberals inwardly rejoice at the white suicides while the “Christian” pastors are full of “grief and sorrow” but never connect the alarming white suicide rates with their anti-“racist” diatribes and corresponding negro worship. But how could it be otherwise? We send white children to indoctrination factories, public and private, that are worse, much worse, than the old communist educational preserves. No wonder that right wing nationalist groups fail to stir up any righteous indignation or anger with their atrocity stories about black on white crime. To indoctrinated whites, the murder of white people is seen as justified “payback” for white crimes against the sacred colored races. They just keep on grazing until their time comes or commit suicide before their time comes.

Authors such as Ainsworth and Defoe have given us an inside look at the black death of Europe. Both authors mention a general, but not total, lapse in faith and corresponding lapse in morality during the plague. It is hard to believe in a loving God when the black death is an ever-present reality. And great charlatans appeared, promising deliverance from the plague if men would only adhere to their false vision of God. It’s a wonder that a few heroes of the inner life stayed faithful.

During our modern black plague, the charlatans are the church men. They tell white church-goers that they will be saved if they adhere to the church men’s vision of a new Christ who died on the cross so He could one day be supplanted by the great negro gods, the true lords of the earth. Only a few, of the same spiritual mettle as the faithful few during Europe’s other black plague, will remain constant while in the midst of this modern black plague. Churchianity will pass away, but His word will remain.

The rape, torture, and murder of white people at the hands of the barbarians of color has become so commonplace that even the most horrific of the atrocities are given no notice in the national news media. But even if the atrocities were reported, there would be no response to them in the white community, because there is no white community. Whites have accepted the Alice in Wonderland logic of the liberals. There is no such thing as a white person when whites try to band together in racial solidarity, but there is such a thing as a white person when liberals want to place the blame for all the evils of the world on a particular race of people.

White privilege? Whites have only the privilege to serve the colored races of the world. Throughout the European nations negro worship and the demonization of the white man is the ruling faith. The few remaining whites whose hearts within them burn at the sight of their people being sacrificed on the altars of negro worship are the whites who will be left to rebuild Christian Europe after the current black plague runs its course. There came a time when the old black plague no longer had the same power it once had. The survivors no longer feared it; most of them had suffered from the disease, some more than once, and they had finally developed an immunity to it. Will such be the case with the modern black plague? After an unremitting deluge of anti-white propaganda and black on white atrocities will the surviving whites finally say, “We have had enough, we are no longer afraid of being called racist. In fact, we welcome the term ‘racist’ – it describes us – we are racist, we love our own kind and we mean to protect and defend them against the liberal techno-barbarians and the savage hordes of color.”

Our starting point is 1st Corinthians 13. That is the European’s creed. The colored shock troops that stand against us are led by the utopians of science and nature: Voltaire, Rousseau, Robespierre, Einstein, Bryon, Shelley, Keats, Shaw, Russell, and every Christian clergyman who abandons the Christ of the European people in preference for a speculative theology that tells us in order to be Christian we must hate our own people and love the negro with all our heart, mind, and soul.

We all die, but if we die while connected to our own people in and through our Lord Jesus Christ, we do not really die. But to die in despair, to die as those who have the sickness unto death, is the fate of all whites who die believing the liberals are right, that there is no such thing as white people as a people. Then there never was a God who became incarnate in the European culture, and the black death is the only reality. Liberals do not ask Christ to come and abide with them. They ask for the comfort of science and the second-hand excitement of communing with the negro gods of nature. As the black plague, the negroization of the European nations, becomes a nightmarish reality with no end in sight, we need to go to the heart of what it means to be a European. So long as we maintain our charity of honor, we shall not be defeated. As we fight to drive every liberal and colored barbarian from the European lands we should remember there is also an eternal Europe, a spiritual Europe, which must be maintained even if this our temporal Europe is consumed by the black death. So long as we believe and act as Europeans, the light of Christ’s Europe will conquer the darkness of the black plague. +

Posted in Bred in the Bone, Defense of the White Race, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on The Black Plague

The Liberals’ Kingdom of Malice

Posted on May 17, 2014 by cwny

Still, it is the primary right of men to die and kill for the land they live in, and to punish with exceptional severity all members of their own race who have warmed their hands at the invaders’ hearth. – Winston Churchill

__________

When Shylock refuses Bassanio’s offer of ten times the original amount of his loan, Bassanio says, “If this will not suffice, it must appear, That malice bears down truth.” And of course that is what is ultimately decided:

For it appears, by manifest proceedings,
That indirectly and directly too,
Thou has contriv’d against the very life
Of the defendant; and thou has incurr’d
The danger formerly by me rehears’d.
Down therefore and beg mercy of the Duke.

We can and must say the same thing to the liberals and the colored barbarians which Portia said to Shylock. It is obvious by manifest proceeding, that indirectly and directly too, the liberals and the colored barbarians seek to exterminate the white race. We should regard anyone who tries to convince us otherwise as our enemy, because it is not possible to say, “I didn’t realize civil rights meant the extermination of the white race,” or, “We are simply treating black people as children of God, what could be wrong with that?” Those who do not see the maniacal hatred the liberals and the colored barbarians have for the white race, which is manifested every day in the streets of the European and American cities and in the daily newspapers and media outlets of every European and American city, do not want to see because they are in sympathy with the ongoing slaughter of white people. The whites who laud and encourage the extermination of white people and the whites who “forgive” the slaughter of white people in the name of a new Christianity heretofore unknown to the Europeans, view themselves as the elect who will be spared the fate of the racist non-elect.

The liberals have a death wish: they wish for your death and mine, not their own. No one, be he priest, minister, or born-again zealot, can claim to be Christian who chooses to ignore the colored onslaught against the white race, or, worse yet, who chooses to countenance the extermination of the white race. Our Lord said that we were not to be deceived by false messiahs. Isn’t the Christ figure of the universalists a false messiah? Would Christ really countenance the massacre of the white race? Would He approve of negro worship? We are facing a new religion, under the guise of an improved and purified Christianity, in which white people are the original sinners, an elect shall be saved, and the negroes and the lesser gods of color are the gods who must be appeased with blood. Need I run through the now familiar litany of blood? The torture murder of Jonathan Foster is always before our eyes as the sign of the manifest evil of the colored barbarians and the satanic nature of the new Churchianity that countenances that evil.

It is not up to us to judge the souls of the mad-dog liberals and the new order of Christians who go along with the mad-dog liberals, but it is up to us to judge and condemn the religion of liberalism and the deeds of those who act upon liberal principles, as well as those who lend support to any part of the liberal agenda. Burke laid bare the spirit of liberalism when he said the French Jacobins sought to attack God by defacing His image in man. The defacing process has been going on for centuries. Has it reached its lowest, most debased form now that the negro man-god has replaced the God-Man? Who can say? All we know is that what the secular liberals and the new-church Christians hold to be sacred is from the devil. What reason created, reason cannot cure. Only hearts of flesh can cure the white man’s sickness unto death.

I recently read that Harvard University was going to allow a satanic black mass to be said on campus and that the State of Oklahoma has authorized a satanic statue to be erected next to a Ten Commandments display in the State House. I think such overt support of Satanism is proper, because all our major institutions are satanic in everything but name so why not put the correct name on the satanic rites of the European people? Whatever is above ground in the European nations is satanic. The old Europe only exists in the underground of the soul. There are still some white men who privately, in their hearts, reject all the liberals’ satanic agenda. The liberals fear such men might exist, so they are ever watchful, ever vigilant, and prefer to attack those innocent of any white sympathies, such as the billionaire Jew who uttered a “racist” remark, rather than risk letting a single guilty racist slip through their fingers.

But looming over and against the Kingdom of Liberaldom is the Christ of the antique Europeans. The tragedy of life is that we mortal men must die. If we don’t carry the image of the true Christ in our hearts during our lives, how can we hope to see Him at the hour of our death? There are deathbed miracles, but if we all forsake the God of our ascending race what will happen to the God who comes to us via the human heart? If we don’t seek Him we shall not find Him now or at the hour of our death.

That life is a journey toward something magnificent is embedded in the folklore of all people. But that life is a journey of the soul toward Someone, a God of infinite love and mercy, is uniquely European. Why do the liberals want to destroy that European vision and replace it with a new vision of a world that is built on hatred, a world without charity or mercy, moving ever onward to nothingness? The liberals’ wish for a consummation, a consummation of nature and nothingness, is born from the same maniacal hatred of Jesus Christ that motivated the swine to plunge headlong off the cliff. And the church men who want to fuse negro worship and Christianity are siding with the devilish swine against Christ.

Burke correctly labeled the devil as the first liberal. And what is the modus operandi of the devil? He uses his abstract reason to separate men from their filial loyalty to God. When the great scholastic separated reason from original sin, he was cutting the ties that bind us to the living God. Reason, as Taine so eloquently put it, supports the passions of our hearts, but it does not replace them.(1) Separate reason from original sin, and reason runs amuck. Every evil under the sun can be countenanced because it is rational and therefore good. Love is from the heart; it is irrational, so it must be evil, but fornication is rational and natural, so it must be good. Liberals instituted cradle-to-grave sexual freedom, because it is rational to allow nature to have full sway. And since the negro is the most natural of all men on earth, it is reasonable and correct to worship the negro and allow him to indulge his natural appetite for blood and sex. From the liberals’ point of view, negro worship is a faith that reconciles reason and nature. Hence the liberals’ hatred for the people who claim there is a God above nature, whose love transcends reason.

European civilization was based on a provincial God of a provincial people. True faith is always at war with universalism because there is no depth of feeling in a universal faith. The great lovers of humanity in the aggregate – the Robespierres, the Trotskys – are always great haters of individual human beings. Our universal kingdom of heaven on earth is supposed to be the most advanced, the most humane civilization ever, based on the universal principles of a Coke commercial. Yet babies are aborted, the blood red tide of color is obliterating the white race, and the church men sing hosannas to the great, universal god of color. If the European people had not been systematically de-souled during the past century, they would not be able to live in a world so devoid of spiritual sustenance. As it is now, they are not living. The liberals live second-hand lives through the negroes, and the grazers graze on the various anesthetizers, such as blood sports and porno, which the liberals provide.

What kind of ideology can sustain a people only if the people do not fully conform to it? Liberalism says there is no incarnate God, and yet liberals bow down before the negro god. Liberalism tells us that death is natural, we need not weep over a pain-free death, and yet my mad-dog liberal sister wept at my father’s death bed. Why weep for an accumulation of atoms? And why, since what is provincial is evil and what is universal is good, do liberals encourage the grazers to become passionately connected to “their team”? The emperor has no clothes: the liberal utopia is based on a lie, the unreality of a rational, natural, guilt-free world, devoid of Europeans who worship the living God, the God of charity and mercy. The consistent liberal will go off the cliff with the swine, because liberalism is a satanic negation of everything good and pure and noble.

Whoever bids us leave our racial hearth fire, even if they wear clerical garb, to warm ourselves at the stranger’s hearth fire is bidding us warm ourselves at the devil’s fires of hell. We are not permitted to sup with or seek comfort from the devil.  The liberals have flown their colors. They hate with the malice of Satan. We need to fly our sovereign’s colors, the Sovereign whose love transcends reason and nature. +

________________________________

(1) In every doctrine which wins men over to it, the sophistry it contains is less potent than the promises it makes; its power over them is greater through their sensibility than through their intelligence; for if the heart is often the dupe of the head, the latter is much more frequently the dupe of the former. We do not accept a system because we deem it a true one, but because the truth we find in it suits us. Political or religious fanaticism, any theological or philosophical channel in which truth flows, always has its source in some ardent longing, some secret passion, some accumulation of intense, painful desire to which a theory affords an outlet…  -Taine

Posted in Antique Christianity, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged | Comments Off on The Liberals’ Kingdom of Malice

The Sentinels of the Lord

Posted on May 10, 2014 by cwny

Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

__________

I concur with the historians such as Herbert Butterfield, who believed that the scientific revolution occurring between the approximate dates of 1660-1715 was the most significant transition in the history of the European people. Prior to the scientific revolution, the religious debate had been between Christian sects, the Protestant side claiming the Catholics were insufficiently scriptural and the Catholic side claiming the Protestants were breaking up the hierarchical system which Christ had left for the benefit of mankind. But that internecine warfare between Christians was a petty squabble in comparison to the real conflict between the religion of science/nature and the religion of the God-Man. Was the natural world, which could be dissected and examined, the real world or was it only the outward manifestation of a spiritual world created by a God who took flesh and dwelt among us in the person of Jesus Christ? From that time on, the period of the scientific revolution, the war began. The post-Christian Europeans, the men whose ancestors heard and believed, reared their ugly heads and rejected Christ for the natural world revealed by science. The pseudo-intellectual verbiage of Voltaire and Rousseau and the pseudo-poetical garbage of Byron and Shelly all amounted to one naturalistic attack on Christ’s reign of charity. What kind of man prefers impersonal nature to the Christ who presides over and above nature? What kind of man works with might and main to destroy the incorporate union between God and the Europeans? The answer: a man who has given his soul to Satan.

The Christian churches’ reaction to the scientific revolution was always one of compromise, but compromise on one side, the Christian side, and never on the side of science. Science kept claiming more and more of the spiritual realm until there was virtually no spiritual realm left in the churches. By the latter half of the 20th century the church men merely gave the new natural religion with the sacred negro as its focal point their blessing and begged leave to hold on to the old buildings and their tax-exempt status.

Nowhere was the schism between atheistic science and Christianity more pronounced than in France of the 1700’s. The French Revolution was the manifestation of that schism. Only Burke saw the spirit behind the French Revolution. He knew that the battle was Christian Europe against a new utopian religion based on science, naturalism, and reason. Halfway-house Christians failed to see the satanic nature of the new religion while the liberals such as Dr. Price and Priestly openly followed the new philosophy of nature and reason in which Christian monarchs and the Christian faith were regulated to the garbage heap of history.

The poison took a long time to spread, and there were Christian counter-attacks. In the late 18th century Walter Scott took up the cudgels for true romance, the romance of the Christian faith, and in the 19th century the Christian counter-revolution to utopian naturalism was even stronger. There was Scott, who bridged the latter half of the 18th century and the early half of the 19th century, and there was Austen, Dickens, Tennyson, Browning, Thomas Hughes, Ian Maclaren, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, and Thomas Nelson Page, to name a few. Those authors articulated a faith that was still alive in the hearts and souls of the European people. A clean, pure faith still existed as something more than a shadow on the wall that fades from sight as soon as you try to get near to it to ascertain its reality.

By the latter part of the 20th century and the beginning of t he 21st century, the forces of scientific naturalism had gained total ascendancy over the European people and made Christianity an irrelevancy to the great majority of Europeans and a thing of ridicule to the intelligentsia. If the Christian faith is false, then its irrelevancy and its lack of adherents in positions of leadership is not a tragedy. But has the Christian faith been proven false? Why do Newton’s laws of motion or Einstein’s theory of relativity make Christ’s resurrection from the dead an impossibility? It is because Christ’s incarnation and resurrection contradict what we know, from a scientific standpoint, about what is natural. It is natural that we die and we rot; that is the way of nature. Has anyone ever observed a dead man rise? There does not seem to be any empirical, scientific evidence of such a phenomenon. But there was once a time – we were very young – when we did not regard the natural world as the sum total of existence. Buried in the mists of time is a people who saw a different reality. They looked on the natural world as a pale mirror of a greater spiritual world that was within. Which brings us back to our present reality, the reality of the maniacal hatred of the liberal technocrats and the black savages for the white race. A ‘this world only’ kingdom of the negro cannot be built if Europeans love their own kind with a love that passeth the understanding of the scientific, empirical mind. Such a love can withstand the onslaughts of the liberal technocrats and the colored barbarians. But if you kill the Europeans’ feeling of pietas by redirecting it to a universalist compost heap, you will have effectively killed the Europeans, and by doing so you will keep the dear Christ out and the negro in.

There are still Christian churches everywhere, and the Christ story is told at Christmas and Easter. But this new ‘Churchianity’ is a naturalized Christianity. Christ is a quasi-divine, mythic figure to the grazers and a second-class social worker to the liberals. We can’t love such a Christ as the true God because He is not a God who enters human hearts. Our heart belongs to our kith and kin; if a universalist Pied Piper tells us to leave our kith and kin for his universalist candy land, we shall not heed him, because such a Pied Piper god cannot be the true God. The God of our people, the people of the European mists, is Christ the redeemer, not Christ the Pied Piper of universalism or a fusion of Carl Jung and Nelson Mandela.

The liberal and the neo-pagan tell us that Christ be not risen, so let’s redefine Him as a negrophile (so says the liberal), or let’s jettison Him (so says the neo-pagan). But the halfway-house Christians tell us something different. They want a happy blending of negro-worshipping liberalism and Christ the Redeemer Christianity. What is wrong with that? What does race matter so long as we worship the Lord? It matters because our race is our spiritual backbone, and without it we cannot stand upright for long. My grandfather, born in the latter half of the 19th century, was an old school European. He grew up in a small, provincial, coal town where everyone was white and held what would now be considered racist opinions. My grandfather was not deceived during the 1960s by the ‘new, improved’ Christianity that was being spouted from the pulpit. His faith remained fundamental and provincially racist in that he did not equate faith in Christ with race-mixing and white genocide. (1)

My father was decidedly more liberal than my grandfather. He considered himself a liberal for most of his life. He loved his father but always denigrated his father’s racism and his Christian provincialism. Toward the end of his life, my father, having accepted the fusion of Babylon and Christianity, started to revert back to his father’s faith. The cause? He witnessed the implementation of the last phase of Babylonian Christianity, which starts with race-mixing, proceeds to feminism, and ends with the acceptance of homosexuality. That last phase of the new Christianity was too much for my father. He started using ‘liberal’ as a pejorative term and taking seriously the ‘mythic’ parts of the Bible that he had formerly scoffed at. By the end of his long life, he believed as his father believed. In my view, from inside and from outside that father-son relationship, it was my grandfather’s racial backbone, his refusal to betray his race, that gave my father a spiritual home to return to. My father saw no nebulous, remote god of Liberaldom at his deathbed, he saw the European Christ, the Son of the living God.

When my father was a young boy, he was bitten by a rattlesnake. My grandfather took him in his arms and ran with him five miles to the hospital over rough terrain so that the medical staff could administer anti-venom to save his life. And so it happened again at the latter stage of my father’s life. His father took him in his arms and placed him at the foot of the cross so that Christ could take all the liberal venom from his soul and envelope him in His arms. The faith of our fathers, their fidelity to their own people, in and through Jesus Christ, is what sustains the Church of Christ here on earth. God bless the fathers who protect their racial hearth fires. They are the sentinels of the Lord, the true Europeans. +

_______________________________________

(1) An old folk tale, which I’ll paraphrase from memory, illustrates the faith of our ancestors who stayed close to their racial hearth fire:

A man dies, along with his beloved dog. He approaches a gate to the next world, and the gate keeper tells him the gate leads to heaven. “You can come in,” the gatekeeper tells him, “but your dog can’t come in.”

“Then I reckon I won’t come in,” the man replies. “What kind of heaven is it where a man has to leave his best friend behind?”

The man proceeds down the road until he comes to another gate. At this gate the man is told that he and his dog are welcome, “because this gate is the gate to heaven.”

“Then why do you let those other people claim their gate is the heavenly gate?”

“Because they help us filter out the bad ones. We don’t want the type of men who would betray their best friend.”

If someone, no matter whether a church man, a teacher, or a psychiatrist, tells us in order to become more Christian, more humane, or more wise, we must abandon the people of our own race, then they are from the devil. Stay close to the faith of our fathers, loving and hating with all your heart.

Posted in Antique Christianity, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Europeans and Christ, Halfway-house churches, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on The Sentinels of the Lord

In the Name of All That is Holy

Posted on May 3, 2014 by cwny

No colored person is ever guilty of ethnic intimidation. Only whites can be guilty of such a crime. Prejudices are good if they stem from colored peoples’ prejudices against whites, but they are evil if they stem from whites’ prejudices against colored people. The long and short of the whole business of race, as the liberals have set it up, is that the white man is evil, and the colored tribesmen, particularly the blacks, are good. And since prejudice is connected to our moral sentiments, the liberals think it is good that blacks and other colored tribesmen should indulge their prejudices because nothing but good can come from them. And it is wrong for white people to indulge their prejudices since white people are evil. So in order to fight evil we all must fight against prejudice, but only one kind of prejudice, the prejudice of white people. –CWNY

__________

A Jewish billionaire allegedly makes a racist remark to his black mistress, and the liberal establishment goes into their usual theatrical ranting and raving, which always culminates in the tearing of their garments and the cry of, “The Negro, our God, is one.” Julia Ward Howe, feminist, Unitarian foe of traditional Christianity, and a negro worshipper, would be proud of her modern day descendants. After all, she wrote the liberals’ national anthem, “The Battle Hymn of the Republic.” It is quintessentially liberal. Using Christian imagery while defaming the God-Man who is the source of the imagery, Howe calls for an apocalyptic war against racist whites in the name of the sacred negro. A good deal of fundamentalist Christians, past and present, thought and still think that Howe’s lines, “Mine eyes have seen the glory of the Lord,” refers to the second coming of Christ. Far from it. Howe’s lines prophesy the new age of utopia in which the negro is to be elevated to the status of God. The Union’s victory in the Civil War was an important step on the road to Howe’s utopia. Our modern European nations represent the fulfillment of her wildest fantasies. The terrible swift sword of the negro-worshipping liberals hews down the racist Europeans and makes all the world free to sing hosannas to nature and nature’s god.

The liberals’ reaction to even the smallest sign of what they term “racism” is an indication of a new phase of liberalism. They no longer, as they did in the early 1960s, talk about defending the rights of people with unpopular opinions. Now they tell us that racism is ‘beyond due process.’ No one has a right to utter racist opinions, even in the privacy of their own home. This new zero tolerance indicates that the liberals are no longer worried that they might be out of power someday and might need due process to cloak their deeds of darkness. They have made the assessment that liberalism has triumphed, and there is no longer any need to cover up what terms such as ‘civil rights’ and ‘inclusion’ were meant to hide: the implementation of a liberal theocracy with the sacred negro as the lodestar of that theocracy.

The descendants of Julia Ward Howe have done it. They’ve built the kingdom of hell right here on earth. When the Europeans saw, through a glass darkly, that the living God had come to dwell with them at their hearth fires and in their hearts, they let their lives reflect His divine love and mercy. Through their love of their people, they responded to His love for them. They became the liturgy of the Christian church. It has been Satan’s mission to destroy that liturgy and replace it with his own. Using the signs and symbols of Christianity and individuals possessed with a hatred for Christ and his people, such as Julia Ward Howe, Satan has destroyed the incorporate union between God and His people.

Human souls are complicated. We can never know all the factors that make some succumb to liberalism and others reject it. But we do know that liberalism, with its attendant negro worship, is from the devil and must be resisted. But we can’t reason with people who have a faith that is beyond reason. One must respond to their unreasoning hate-filled faith with a faith in the God who bids us love with a love that is beyond mere reason. The liberals are possessed with a demonic faith, and the grazers have been beaten down by Satan’s liturgy: “The white man is evil, the Black man is good, the white man is evil, the Black man is good… Blessed be the name of the Black man forever and ever. Amen.” Only a people who love much, in Christ and through their people, can come to grips with and defeat the enemy behind that perverse liturgy.

The seemingly hopeless plight of the white man is the result of the de-Christianizing of the Christian churches. The downward spiral to oblivion will continue throughout the white nations (soon to be colored nations) so long as Christ remains part of a rationalist system which only theologians and theological clergymen have access to. Theology has no racial hearth fire; hence, there is nothing in theology to stir a man’s passions. The theological Christ is a distant God who occasionally goes to ecumenical teas and civil rights rallies, but he is not the God of our ascending race. We need our hearth-fire Christ, now and at the hour of our death. Death has no sting if our hearth-fire Christ is present, and our people, as a people, will never die if He is present. The negro-worshipping liberals and the church-going Christians who fuse negro-worship with Christian worship have left the hearth-fire Christ in the dustbin of history. Those few who still believe in the sacred channels of grace that can only be found at our racial hearth fires will still see the living God. Nothing is impossible for such men. Satan knows this, which is why, having separated the European from his racial hearth fire, he wants to make sure that the European remains eternally separated from it.

In Walt Disney’s Peter Pan, Wendy’s father, who never believed in the Peter Pan story, sees, at the end of the film, a shadow of Peter Pan riding through the air in his ship. After seeing that vision through a glass darkly, Mr. Darling declares that he seems to remember such a vision from a time long, long ago. Yes, those “pilgrim shadows” remind us of our European youth when we were connected, through our mysterious human relationships, to a fairy tale God who loved us in and through the people of our race.

The Christian churches have become adjuncts for Satan because they have made adherence to man-made theology the litmus test for faith. To know the formula of salvation has become more important than knowing the God who transcends the formula. In their youth, when they knew God through His human channels of grace, the Europeans were genuine human beings placing themselves in the hand of God and defying the devil and all his works. Now, having forsaken the living God for a universal God who has no basis in reality the European people are a people without a faith, which makes them a people without a local habitation and a name. Who are the Europeans? They are the men and women who must offer up their blood to the gods of color in order to atone for the white man’s past sins against the negro gods. Every day the sacrificial rites are performed. Whites are raped and murdered while liberals applaud and churchmen tell us we mustn’t be prejudiced and violent because of a few playful indiscretions of the godlike negro. After all, who are we to question our gods?

All the wrath of church and state is brought to bear against any white who does not seem to be in a state of rapture about the sanctity of the black race. This is called “fighting racism.” There are no racist whites, which is regrettable, but there is an infinitude of black racists who want to exterminate the white race. Shouldn’t that type of racism be of more concern than the offhand remarks of a Jewish billionaire? The brave new world we live in is a satanic reversal of everything we once held to be true and noble and good. The prejudiced Europeans once believed that the colored races who had no concept of charity and mercy had to be controlled lest they overwhelm the European people and impose their own merciless reign of terror on white people. Now Europeans believe that they must atone for their whiteness by sacrificing their people to the gods of color. Why must we do this? Why do popes, bishops, and ministers of the Gospel join with the jackals of Liberaldom to tell whites that they must hate not only their ancestors but also their children if they are ever going to inherit the kingdom of heaven? Such a heaven is really a hell, and we can’t, in the name of all that is holy, submit to the ethos of hell, no matter that our clergyman and their liberal overlords tell us we must. But that is the issue. The liberals and the self-serving clergy are acting in accord with all that they think is holy. To them the negro and the lesser gods of color are holy, and whoever denies that tenet of faith is a blasphemer and will be dealt with accordingly.

The French Revolution revealed the extent to which men possessed by a satanic ideology would go to eradicate all people opposed to their ideology. The race war is the logical extension of the French Revolution. In the name of the people of color, who are the only true people, the white race must cease to exist.

It certainly seems like the end of the European people. But we are the people of the storybooks. If a few Europeans would stand up for storybook Europe, the Europe that still lives in our racial memory, the forces of Babylon, no matter how many their number will be defeated. We simply need to believe as the best of the European people believed: “Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this world? Hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?” Yes, He has. We are Pickwick, we are Ivanhoe, we are the Europeans, the foolish ones who believe that faith, hope, and charity will defeat negro worshipping liberalism. +

Posted in Defense of the White Race, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on In the Name of All That is Holy

The Return to Our Blood Faith

Posted on April 26, 2014 by cwny

“Speculation performs the feat of understanding all Christianity, but, please note, it does not understand it Christianly but speculatively, which is precisely the misunderstanding, since Christianity is the very opposite of speculation.” – Soren Kierkegaard

_____

“It is only the liberals who benefit from their association with the great whore, because they only use the whore-goddess Reason to advance their satanic passion to destroy God by destroying His image in the European people. By screaming ‘racism’ and ‘simple-minded superstition’ the liberals sought to kill all opposition to liberalism. And they have succeeded. ‘Who is here so base that would be a racist? Who is here so rude that would not be opposed to superstition in the form of an incarnate God? If any, speak for him have we offended.’

“The men of the right did not speak. They simply cried, ‘We are not racist, we are not simple-minded, we believe in the rationality of the Christian faith.’ But the love of one’s kith and kin is beyond reason, and that same love brings us to the foot of the Cross, to the God whose love is beyond reason. When the men of the right stepped away from their racial hearth fire to embrace reason, unfettered by prejudice and tradition, they betrayed their people and their God.” – CWNY

__________

I recently read an article on an alternative news site about a black superstar basketball player who was a member of a black cult organized for the extermination of the white race. Now, the fact that a group of black men desire the extermination of the white race is not news. Most black men and women (with the possible exception of Thomas Sowell, who conservatives always bring up at their ‘not all are like that’ idiocy sessions) desire the extermination of the white race. What is significant is that the black basketball player sees no need to hide the fact that he is a member of a group of blacks who want to exterminate the white race. Indeed, why should he hide his satanic desires? White people give him $20 million plus a year and worship him every time he steps on the court, despite the fact that he wants to exterminate them. Look back through history: has there ever been a time when a minority group openly espoused the extermination of the majority and still remained, not only alive, but a pampered, worshipped elite? No, there hasn’t. The western liberals and the grazers have gone where no people have ever gone before.

Of course that was whole purpose of the utopian journey, to go where no people had gone before. And where are we, the European people, in this new ‘perfect’ world? We do not exist as human beings; we are cattle, grazing in the fields, waiting to be slaughtered. And the slaughter will not be halted by conservatism, neo-paganism, or libertarianism, because all three ‘isms’ are godless. Liberal, negro-worshipping utopianism is a faith; it can only be defeated by people who believe in something greater than ‘democracy.’ They must have a living faith, the bred-in-the-bone faith of the antique Europeans, who looked on fidelity to one’s kith and kin as the cornerstone of their faith, the one true path to Christ. Destroy that cornerstone and you have effaced the image of God in man, which effectually cuts men off from the living God and leaves the field open to satanic gods.

The decline of the Christian faith among the European people was noted by the early twentieth century intellectuals. The more liberal intellectuals, such as Bertrand Russell and Bernard Shaw, thought the decline was a good thing. The more conservative intellectuals such as Spengler and Gibbon thought it was a bad thing, but they were unable to see how to prevent the decline because they were rationalist just like Russell and Shaw. They didn’t like the way the Russell-Shaw types gloated, but they couldn’t find their way out of the rationalist stew pot: “A rabble of women and promiscuous vulgarians cannot be induced to answer to the call of Philosophic Reason if you are wanting to lead them to piety and holiness and faith. In dealing with people of that sort, you cannot do without superstition; and superstition, in its turn, has to be fed with fairy tales and hocus-pocus.”

I’m reminded of a college seminar I attended in my early twenties. A cabal of ex-priests and ex-ministers had gathered together to discuss the decline of Christianity. They all agreed that people, particularly the European people, needed to believe in Christianity, but, ‘What can we do? We’re all Hegelian rationalists now.’ Indeed, what could they do? They turned to the negro gods of nature, because such gods were man-gods rather than the God-Man. You don’t have to believe the impossible – that Christ was crucified, died, and was buried, and rose again on the third day – in order to believe in god-men who do not rise from the dead and do not require mercy, only the sacrifice of white blood upon black altars.

That ‘rising from the dead’ thing is what has stopped the white man cold. From a rationalist, scientific standpoint, Christ’s resurrection is a fairy tale, and fairy tales are for children, not adults. The seeds of negro worship were planted by the theologians and theological poets who thought they could explain the ways of God to man in rational terms that would not scandalize the men of science. But why should we be so afraid of the men of science? Ionesco, the convert from the theater of the absurd, said it was because of the connection between science and medicine. ‘We mustn’t criticize scientists and doctors; we are all in their hands.’

Science is a false messiah. When I worked as a police officer, I often had to administer CPR to heart attack victims before the medical workers, who had the machines, showed up. It was sad to see the hope in the eyes of the victim’s relatives when the medical workers took over with their machines, because I knew that the machines could help sustain life, but they could not resurrect it. Sadly the white man no longer believes Christ can resurrect the dead, so he has chosen to take solace in science and the negro. This might seem like an odd juxtaposition, but once dumb nature becomes the sum total of existence, who but the negro, the most brutishly natural of all God’s creatures, can become God?

Melville likened the modern, rationalist Europeans to drowning men: “[W]ell enough they know they are in peril; well enough they know the causes of that peril;–nevertheless, the sea is the sea, and these drowning men do drown.” Can a man reason his way out of the rationalist prison? Conservatives in church and state have tried to do just that for centuries. The Protestant theologians responded to Aquinas’ rationalism with a rationalism of their own, which reduced Christianity to a philosophical proposition. The secular philosophers took the theologians at their word — reason is prior to faith — and proceeded to speculate Christ out of existence. ‘What reason destroys, reason can restore,’ has been the war cry of the conservatives for the last one hundred years. But ‘tis not so. Reason cannot restore the European people, only faith can, and reason, as narrowly defined by the theologians and philosophers is not compatible with faith. Only a reason subordinate to and in support of the heart is compatible with faith. That misplaced passion can lead a man astray is an axiom of the moral theologians. But has reason never led a man astray? Was it the desire to know too much or to love too much that tempted Adam and Eve? To look upon God with the eyes of philosophical speculation is the original sin. The colored races and the liberals use their reason to support the passion of their hearts, which, in the liberals’ case, is a desire to destroy the Christ-bearing race so that the image of the living God can be eradicated from the face of the earth. The colored barbarians share the liberals’ hatred for the white race, but their hatred is more elemental; they have not made a conscious Byronic rejection of Christ, because they have never known Christ; faith in Christ was not bred into their bones. They don’t have to purge their blood of Christianity in order to hate the white man; they need only react according to their blood. This is why the white liberal loves and reveres the colored races and seeks to fuse his blood with theirs. He, the white liberal, is afraid of his own blood, because the ancient faith might be lurking there, so he takes refuge in pure reason. And the costly price of that refuge is a life that can only be lived second-hand through the colored races. The modern white man does not take offense at a black basketball player who wants to murder white people, because the white man only lives through the black race. If his god, the god that gives him a secondhand life on earth, wishes to destroy the white race, who is he to question his black gods? ‘The black gods giveth and the black gods taketh away; blessed be the black gods forever.’ Of course, the liberal hopes he will be one of the elect whom the black gods will spare. And he convinces himself of his election by constantly proclaiming the sanctity and holiness of his black gods, who were crucified in the terrible racist days of Europe but who have risen from the dead to sitteth on the thrones of glory, created for them by the rational, scientific white men.

When I say the white man needs a poetic to combat the liberals’ poetic, I do not mean to suggest that white men need to write poetry, in the literal sense. Many poets, such as Poe, Byron, and Shelley lacked a deep poetic sense of life. They were rationalists with a gift for words. They lacked vision; they did not see the animating spirit behind the façade of nature. When I use the term ‘poetic’ I mean inwardness, the inwardness of St. Paul, Shakespeare, Dickens, and Scott, who saw what the rationalists could never and will never see: they saw God’s hand reaching out to man. Because they did not try to comprehend God with their minds, they were able to understand Him through the love they bore for Him in their hearts. The union of the divine and the human takes place in the human heart. Our people were vouchsafed a vision of the living God so long as they maintained that union. Now our people perish because they listen to the philosophical speculators who hate everything that stinks of humanity and the humane God. Win them over?

You may as well go stand upon the beach
And bid the main flood bate his usual height.
You may as well use question with the wolf
Why he hath made the ewe bleat for the lamb.
You may as well forbid the mountain pines
To wag their high tops and to make no noise
When they are fretten with the gusts of heaven.
You may as well do anything most hard,
As seek to soften that—than which what’s harder?—
His Jewish heart.

Therein lies the mystery of the white man’s suicidal worship of the black. Philosophical speculation has made Christian hearts into Jewish ones. Bertrand Russell, he of the philosophically-hardened heart, writes in his autobiography that he became dizzy and had to lean against a wall “in the darkest part of a winding staircase” when he heard a classmate reciting Blake’s poem “The Tyger.” (1) Why should that poem have had such an effect on the philosophical atheist? Perhaps for one dizzying moment, Russell felt that there was a God above his natural world of rationalism and science. If he did feel that way for a moment, the moment certainly passed. He lived to be 98 years old, polluting the world with his evil, simplistic atheism. And that is the striking thing about the Russells, the Shaws, the Wells, and the Einsteins of the world. They are rather stupid. By killing the organ of sight, the heart, they have destroyed their ability to see existence in its totality. They have become lost in a forest of minutiae. At first consideration of a work by Toynbee, for example, one is impressed by the encyclopedic breadth of his knowledge. But upon perusal of the work, we find no depth of thought. Toynbee is one of the analytic liberals who starts with the a priori assumption that human reason is supreme, and revealed truth, which is confirmed by the heart, is ‘superstition and fairy tales.’ Truth be told, there is more wisdom in the collected works of the Brothers Grimm than in the entire canon of post-Christian psychiatry, philosophy, and literature.

Negro-worshipping liberals will rule Europe until the European Everyman musters up the courage to declare to Satan’s legionaries — the psychiatrists, the academics, the scientists, and the politicos — that ‘ “My mind hath been as big as one of yours… my reason haply more,” yet I’ll go with my heart, which sees with blinding sight past your hellish utopia to His green and pleasant land.’

Lincoln talked about the great civil war we were engaged in to preserve man’s best hope, democracy. He was right about the great civil war, but he was wrong about what the war was about. It was about the preservation of the white Christian race. The forces of utopian liberalism and black barbarism were united against all that was good and noble and holy. That war continues still throughout all the European countries, only now it is a simple mop-up operation for the forces of the liberals and the colored barbarians. Occasionally, a Cliven Bundy ‘steps out’ and goes against the Leviathan, but such men are routinely crushed by the forces of Liberaldom. (2)

From a ‘this world only’ standpoint, it seems the forces of evil have triumphed, but I still believe as Thomas Nelson Page believed: if we love and hate with all our hearts, we Christian Goths will triumph. +

___________________________________

(1) The Tyger

Tyger! Tyger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?

And what shoulder, & what art.
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand? & what dread feet?

What the hammer? what the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? what dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?

When the stars threw down their spears,
And watered heaven with their tears,
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the Lamb make thee?

Tyger! Tyger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?

– William Blake

(2) The liberals believe they now have the right to exterminate Bundy because he is a blasphemer: he said that blacks were better off in the bad old days of slavery because the Southern slave owners were more concerned with keeping black families intact than our federal government is now. His views of blacks are truthful and Christian, yet the lovers of truth, the mainstream conservatives, fled from him as soon as he uttered his ‘racist’ views. And the ‘Christians,’ those great believers in godless Jews and negroes, denounced Bundy right from the beginning.

Bundy will be martyred; let us hope and pray that he dies outside of a federal prison and that his whole family is not martyred along with him. “Tis the time’s plague when madmen lead the blind.” Bundy thinks that black families should stay intact and that the federal government should not own America, so the liberals and their conservative allies shout, ‘Crucify him!’ Black basketball players advocate the extermination of the white race, and the liberals and their conservative allies in church and state shout, “We adore you, we worship you, we give thanks for your presence among us.” Is it possible to claim the name of Christian and stand with the great haters of our people? No, it is not possible. What does the old hymn say?

Who will leave the world’s side? Who will face the foe?
Who is on the Lord’s side? Who for Him will go?
By Thy call of mercy, by Thy grace divine,
We are on the Lord’s side—Savior, we are Thine!

Posted in Blood faith, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Poets vs philosophers, Rationalism, Scientism | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Return to Our Blood Faith

Easter

Posted on April 19, 2014 by cwny

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. – 1 Corinthians 15:54

_____

A brilliant morning shines on the old city.  Its antiquities and ruins are surpassingly beautiful, with a lusty ivy gleaming in the sun, and the rich trees waving in the balmy air.  Changes of glorious light from moving boughs, songs of birds, scents from gardens, woods, and fields—or, rather, from the one great garden of the whole cultivated island in its yielding time—penetrate into the Cathedral, subdue its earthy odour, and preach the Resurrection and the Life.  The cold stone tombs of centuries ago grow warm; and flecks of brightness dart into the sternest marble corners of the building, fluttering there like wings. – The Mystery of Edwin Drood

__________

Only the antique Europeans and those modern Europeans who have striven with might and main to stay connected to the ancient Europeans can truly understand the height and depth of the Easter miracle, because only the European people, as a people, believed in Christ’s resurrection from the dead. They did not adhere to the religion of Christ crucified, Christ risen in order to please the mighty of the world. They were the mighty of the world: they had conquered Rome.  They bent their knees to a divine humanity that was like unto their own humanity, but greater, greater because it was more human than their humanity. Now, the same people that showed us the face of Jesus Christ are being demonized, as Christian Europeans once demonized African and Aztec Satanists. This should tell us something about our modern society and make us question, if we claim the name of Christian, whether we can serve negro-worshipping Liberaldom and Christ at the same time.

The battle for the church of Christ – where two or three are gathered together in His name – and the battle for the white race is the same battle. If the ancient Europeans were wrong about God, if the Christ of Handel’s Messiah is not the living God, then to whom shall we turn for the words of eternal life? Surely not to the negro, nor to any of the Asian gods of nothingness. It is essential that the true European, the European who has stayed close to his racial hearth fire, remain faithful. He is the Christ bearer who knows that His Redeemer liveth, that death has been defeated by the very same Savior his European ancestors believed in. The European Christ is the Living God! This Easter, and every Easter, blessed be His name. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Easter, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Resurrection | Tagged | Comments Off on Easter

The Lay of the European Minstrel

Posted on April 12, 2014 by cwny

Hush’d is the harp: the Minstrel gone.
And did he wander forth alone?
Alone, in indigence and age,
To linger out his pilgrimage?
No; close beneath proud Newark’s tower,
Arose the Minstrel’s lowly bower;
A simple hut; but there was seen
The little garden hedged with green,
The cheerful hearth, and lattice clean.
There shelter’d wanderers, by the blaze,
Oft heard the tale of other days;
For much he lov’d to ope his door,
And give the aid he begg’d before.
So pass’d the winter’s day; but still,
When summer smil’d on sweet Bowhill,
And July’s eve, with balmy breath,
Wav’d the blue-bells on Newark heath;
When throstles sung in Harehead-shaw,
And corn was green on Carterhaugh,
And flourish’d, broad, Blackandro’s oak,
The aged Harper’s soul awoke!
Then would he sing achievements high,
And circumstance of chivalry,
Till the rapt traveller would stay,
Forgetful of the closing day;
And noble youths, the strain to hear,
Forsook the hunting of the deer;
And Yarrow, as he roll’d along,
Bore burden to the Minstrel’s song.

-Walter Scott

__________


With the exception of his poem “El Dorado,” which is usually only seen in children’s poetry anthologies, I never cared much for the prose and poetry of Edgar Allan Poe. Like Shakespeare and Dostoevsky he sees the dark side of human existence: the evil that men do and the evil that they yearn to do in their inmost hearts, but unlike Shakespeare and Dostoevsky Poe doesn’t see the light that is also in human hearts. It’s quite significant that Poe, who was ignored by his own countrymen, was lionized by the decadent French symbolists who regarded him as the first modern poet. I don’t know if he was the first modernist, but he certainly was modern in his sensibility, and that is what kept him, despite great technical virtuosity, from being a great poet. But since it is the spirit of modernity that has led the white man to the dark tower of negro worship, it might be helpful to look more closely at the works of Edgar Allan Poe and then see if there is an antidote for modernity or, to paraphrase Poe’s biblical quote from “The Raven,” to see if there is a balm in Gilead.

Most men do not have the burden of vision; they do not see life as the poet does. Perhaps it is better that way, or else the work of the world could not go on. But then again men must, even the most material-minded of men, have a vision of something more than this world if they are to continue functioning in this world. Maybe they only need a glimpse of the vision, but they do need it. It is up to the poet to provide that vision for his people. He needs to be the brave man who dreams dreams and sees visions. But what if the poet’s dreams are nightmares and his vision is a vision of hell? Then the people perish for want of light.

Poe’s vision of darkness was not his vision alone; a poet’s vision is never just his own solitary vision. Poe saw the coming conflict within the European people, between the religion of cosmic nature and Christianity, and he internalized that conflict within his own soul. Nowhere is the conflict more visible than in Poe’s poem, “The Raven.” With mathematical certainty, the Raven informs Poe that the dead do not rise, and he shall “nevermore” see his lost love. King Lear says something similar, “Never, Never, Never…” about his daughter Cordelia’s death, but in the case of Lear we do not get the sense that it is over; we feel that Cordelia’s death is an apotheosis, not a mathematical endgame.

“The Raven” is a perfect poem, mechanically speaking, but that is the problem with it. It is too mathematically perfect. Indeed, Poe was supposed to have been a double genius, poetical and mathematical, who did complex problems in geometry for amusement. But mathematical genius is not of the spirit; it is pedestrian and mundane and should not be blended with or given an ascendancy over poetical genius. In Poe’s case the ascendancy of math over poetry is obvious. The Raven’s mathematical, evil genius overcame the craven Poe’s poetical genius just as Mr. Hyde overcame Dr. Jekyll.

Stevenson, who was born one year after Poe’s death, also saw the ongoing war between the scientistic/mathematical European and the poetical European. But Stevenson rejected the Raven’s “Nevermore”; where Poe saw only darkness, Stevenson saw the light that shineth in darkness. If only Poe had remained true to the spiritual quest of the knight in “El Dorado” as Stevenson remained true to his dear land of storybooks, then he would have given his people a vision of the living God instead of a nightmarish vision of hell.

What Poe saw in his nightmarish vision was a natural world devoid of God’s grace. The Raven’s “Nevermore” was the answer that mathematical nature always gives to mortal men. And Poe, quite understandably, despaired because he thought his beloved would never come back to him. He could not be consoled by the negro gods of nature because those gods were not in place yet. And even if they had been, I don’t think they could have filled the void in Poe’s soul. He was still of the “there is no God, everything is terrible” school, in contrast to the modern liberals who joyously proclaim the death of the Christian God and welcome in the new black gods.

People just yawn now when they read Poe’s tales and poems because his nightmarish underground world of horror and black despair has become mainstream. Why then, if Poe’s vision of the Raven upon his chamber door has become the vision of the modern world, do not the modern Europeans succumb to the same despair that Poe succumbed to? Are the modern Europeans spiritually superior to Poe? Are they able to look into the void without flinching? Hardly. They have managed to live their lives without facing the Raven’s ‘nevermore.’ Superficiality has proven to be a very good defense against Ravens who persist in rapping at one’s chamber door. The moderns can yawn at Poe’s tales because they don’t take his vision of existence seriously. The liberals’ have the negro to comfort them, and the grazers have the many and varied opiates of modernity to ease them through life. To look at Poe’s vision of life, and take his horrific vision seriously, would be a step up for the liberal and the grazer. Then they would have to choose, Christ or the abyss.

While it’s perfectly true that Christ is the balm in Gilead, telling a modern European raised on opiates and negro worship that Christ is risen and we no longer need to fear the Raven’s “Nevermore” is like expecting a person who has only seen the last scene in Hamlet to understand the play. Christ, the warrior bard who loved His people with a love that passeth the understanding of the human mind, has been buried for so long by pin-headed theologians and solemn philosophical undertakers that His divine charity, which once warmed the European hearth fires and enflamed our hearts, has been forced out of this world, remaining only as a racial memory in the hearts of we few, we Europeans, who still hear the minstrel’s lay. The song of the European minstrel trumps the Raven’s “Nevermore.” “Evermore, Evermore” is the Minstrel’s lay, “the cross of Christ is the tree of life.”

It should be writ large in our hearts that wherever rationalism raises its venomous, snake-like head, negro worship will follow. It doesn’t matter whether it’s in church or state, rationalism is the Raven, the contemplation of dumb nature, which leads to the worship of the negro. The modern conservative and the liberals are rationalists therefore they both, despite petty differences, worship the negro. Neither side defines nature as Burke defined nature:

We know, and it is our pride to know, that man is by his constitution a religious animal; that atheism is against, not only our reason, but our instincts; and that it cannot prevail long. But if, in the moment of riot, and in a drunken delirium from the hot spirit drawn out of the alembic of hell, which in France is now so furiously boiling, we should uncover our nakedness, by throwing off that Christian religion which has hitherto been our boast and comfort, and one great source of civilization amongst us, and amongst many other nations, we are apprehensive (being well aware that the mind will not endure a void) that some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition might take place of it.

For that reason, before we take from our establishment the natural, human means of estimation, and give it up to contempt, as you have done, and in doing it have incurred the penalties you well deserve to suffer, we desire that some other may be presented to us in the place of it. We shall then form our judgment.

The modern man, addicted to psychiatry and porno, thinks we have no instincts but animal instincts and our reason is a tool to further the ends of our animalistic appetites. The law of the Jungle prevails, which is why the man-god of the Jungle, the noble negro savage who has not been polluted by the religion of the God-Man, is the god of our new, natural, utopian world.

Nature in the raw has no appeal to me. An ocean is just a large body of water until it connects with a coastal town in Wales or a sleepy fishing village in Maine. I could care less about an aesthetically pleasing forest or mountain in Africa, but my heart soars when I view the dark forests of Germany or the Swiss Alps. Why? Thomas Moore said it best:

There is not in the wide world a valley so sweet
As that vale in whose bosom the bright waters meet;    
Oh! the last rays of feeling and life must depart,              
Ere the bloom of that valley shall fade from my heart.   

Yet it was not that nature had shed o’er the scene
Her purest of crystal and brightest of green;      
’Twas not her soft magic of streamlet or hill,      
Oh! no—it was something more exquisite still. 

’Twas that friends, the beloved of my bosom, were near,           
Who made every dear scene of enchantment more dear,           
And who felt how the best charms of nature improve,  
When we see them reflected from looks that we love. 

Sweet vale of Avoca! how calm could I rest         
In thy bosom of shade, with the friends I love best,        
Where the storms that we feel in this cold world should cease,         
And our hearts, like thy waters, be mingled in peace.

My people! The friends of my bosom. What have they done that they should be condemned and set aside for slaughter? They brought forth the Christ Child. Just as Mary’s blessed acceptance of the incarnate Lord set the Christ story in motion, so did my people’s acceptance of Christ as their Lord and Kinsman set the story of Christian civilization in motion. It’s ridiculous to say human beings are mere puppets, manipulated by God. He has given us the freedom to reject His grace. And the Europeans did not reject His grace, they asked Him to come and dwell amongst them. God bless them for it. All that I am and what faith I have is because they, the friends of my bosom, were willing to be channels of grace for Christ the Lord. I love them; they are my good and noble kinsmen, who showed me the face of Jesus Christ.

It’s not a little thing, the marriage between Christ and the European people. Without it, we are doomed to hear, over and over again, the cold, heartless Raven, pronouncing his death sentence on mankind, “Nevermore.” “The dead shall not rise,” is what negro-worshipping Liberaldom is all about, Charlie Brown. And, “Death is swallowed up in victory,” is what Christian Europe is all about. The struggle does availeth. To God goes the glory, forever and ever, Amen. +

Posted in Fairy tale mode of understanding, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Poets vs philosophers, Rationalism | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Lay of the European Minstrel

The Christ Bearing People

Posted on April 5, 2014 by cwny

Before the Altar kneeled the saint in prayer,
Fixed on the Crucified his steadfast gaze–
How hard his way with danger and contempt!
Sudden, with rapture thrilled, his heart beat stayed.
Was it a miracle or but a dream?
The chapel walls dissolved and heav’n appeared,
The cross of shame became a growing tree,
Raising its branches sun-ward fair and tall–
See how each twig is weighted down with fruit.
The close air of the church no more he breathes–
A gentle breeze bears scents of summer fruit.
He sees the Glorified with arms outstretched,
‘Thou in a holy hour has gazed on Heaven.
Thy dream is true. This earthly life is dream,
The holy cross, it is the tree of life.’
Now God be praised for pain that veiled His face.

-Otto Crusius

__________

In his autobiography Yeats tells of an old-guard devotee of Thomas Moore who was fond of saying, “I’d walk ten miles through a bog to avoid the music of Wagner.” Yeats, because he was one of those ‘betwixt and between’ souls with Christian and rationalist sympathies, quoted the reactionary Wagner-hater with disapproval. I, with no modernist sympathies, approve of the old reactionary’s sentiments. I had similar feelings as a young man about books on Christian mysticism. I would have run ten miles through a bog to avoid reading about or hearing about Christian mysticism. My sentiments about Christian mysticism haven’t changed now that I’m older, only I would now have to walk the ten miles through the bog rather than run.

The problem with what has been labeled Christian mysticism is the problem with the modern Europeans. It is, and they are, too Oriental and too intellectual. Oriental mysticism stresses oneness with an impersonal spirit or force in which the devotee and the deity blend together into … what? Into nothingness. And the “Christian” mysticism of the European intellectuals is much too often a form of rationalism devoid of any depth or genuine mystic content. We’ve all seen the ten-point plans to sanctity and the mystic “spiritual exercises” that purport to build up our spiritual muscles like a Charles Atlas program builds up our fleshly muscles. But is living the life of the spirit as easy as solving a problem in math? Do we just lay out the factors, put them together in the right order, and come up with the correct answer to the problem of God? I don’t see anything of value in that type of mysticism, because I don’t see any divine-human connection. There is no God “who imparts to human hearts” in the intellectual mysticism of either the Oriental or the Christian rationalist schools of mystic theology. Why did our Lord and His most passionate and profound advocate, St. Paul, not leave behind a theology of mysticism or a theology of any kind? Maybe it was because they wanted us to respond to Christ’s divine charity with passionate hearts rather than contemplative minds.

In my own anti-European nation and the rest of the anti-European European nations throughout the world there is a strange phenomenon that occurs every time there is some natural or man-made disaster, like a flood, hurricane, tornado, power outage, and so on. The seemingly dead-to-life white grazers come out and work around the clock to help victims of the disaster and to put their community back on its feet. And while the white grazers, who cease to be grazers for the duration of the emergency, are working to set things right and protect the victims of the disaster, the colored tribesmen take advantage of the emergency situation and step up their rapes, murders, and pillaging. Then, when things are back to normal, the white rescue workers go back to the pasture and, at the bidding of the liberals, worship the sacred colored tribesmen who were raping, murdering, and looting during the emergency. It doesn’t make much sense, does it?

We must ask why the white grazer is so schizophrenic. Why does he act like a white man in times of crisis and then return to white-hating negro worship when the crisis is over? I think the answer lies in the subterranean depths, the mystic depths, of the European heart. Let’s put the European Everyman on the same heath where Macbeth and Banquo stood, facing the witches. Macbeth went the way of mystic rationalism: he sought to use the mystic powers of darkness for his own ends. Banquo chose the other way, the way of the Cross. Banquo saw that the cross of Christ leads upward to God just as those men on the Titanic saw, when they accepted their cross, Christ taking them from out of the ocean’s depths into the heavens where He resides with His heavenly Father.

The white grazers go about their daily lives under the spell of the liberals’ mystic rationalism because they have accepted, in their minds, the liberals’ faith. But their hearts, which are not sufficiently strong to fight the daily fight against the powers of darkness, occasionally revert to the ancient faith of their European ancestors, who choose the better part, and then they do heroic deeds. But such heroic deeds are mere lapses, just as non-heroic deeds of mystic rationalism were lapses for the antique European. The balance has shifted toward the mystic rationalism of Macbeth, and hell on earth is the consequence.

True Christian mysticism is grounded in charity. St. Paul, who spoke in tongues and had revelations from God, still said there was a “better way.” The man whose heart is connected to His heart will love his fellow men in and through Christ. There is no conflict between the Christian’s belief that Christ desires the salvation of all mankind and the antique Europeans’ racial exclusiveness. We cannot learn of God’s divine charity through mystic rationalism which concerns itself with abstractions and impersonal, cosmic oneness. We can only know the God of faith, hope, and charity at home, at our racial hearth fire, where God imparts to human hearts. Without that mystic, racial connection to God, we will not believe in a personal God above nature who desires the salvation of our race and every race. We will only believe in an impersonal, cosmic god of nature who doesn’t hear our prayers. The impersonal, cosmic nature god bids us join the universalist trash heap now, and at the hour of our deaths.

There are two Europeans. The one took the way of Odin: he stayed at his racial hearth fire and saw the living God, the God of Odin and all Europeans, on the sacred cross. By that cross the European conquered.

The second European was a satanic offshoot of the first. He turned from the cross and sought God in nature, in the mystic contemplation of nothingness. Inch by inch, a new satanic tabernacle was built in which the negro is worshipped. “We are of the negro and in the negro,” the mystic rationalists chant. “He is the beginning and the end of all our mystic strivings.” The grazers have not the will to resist the mystic rationalists, because they have lost the fire that can only come from a deep and abiding faith in the God of charity and mercy, who our European ancestors came to know and love at their racial hearths. So long as the grazers allow the liberals to keep them away from their racial homes, that other European ethos, the satanic ethos of death in life negro worship will rule the European world.

As Odin felt death approaching, he gathered his followers around him. “All my life I’ve fought against the forces of darkness for the sake of you, my kinsmen. But now I must leave you for a little while, and then I’ll return to fight with you in the final battle against Loki and the forces of evil. But I shall not lead you in the fight: He [pointing to the Crucifix above the throne of Odin] shall lead you. We belong to Him, the one true God, in Him and through Him we shall conquer. We are the Christ-bearers; remember that and all shall be well.”

The grazers have forgotten what their divine mission is, and the liberals have denounced their divine mission. The way of the mystic rationalists is not the way of the cross; they see life abundant in the blackness of Babylon, a Babylon in which the sacred negro is worshipped as the highest level of mystic contemplation. If the white grazer had any racial instincts left, he would fight the new Babylon with the same intensity that he demonstrates in his battles with natural disasters. But an intense hatred of Babylon can only come from those who love much. Men without racial homes do not have the passion to fight the daily battles that one must fight in order to defeat the forces of Babylon.

Shakespeare writes in Sonnet 116:

Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
If this be error and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.

If our people have played us false, if their vision of Christ, the European Christ, whose love passeth the understanding of the white intellectuals and the colored barbarians, is not true, then there is no God, and we are all doomed to perish in the great cosmic garbage heap. But death shall have no dominion; we can learn from such convertites as the first Christian Goths. They loved their people in and through Christ. When thought is sifted through the heart, it becomes more than thought, it becomes vision. They saw with blinding sight, those Christian Goths, and so shall we, when we take up the sacred European cross bequeathed to us by our ancestors, which they received from their kinsman and their Lord Jesus Christ. As Odin told us, so long ago, “We are the Christ-bearers; remember that and all shall be well.” +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Grazers, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Christ Bearing People