A World Without Mercy

Posted on March 11, 2017 by cwny

I am sorry for thee; thou art come to answer
A stony adversary, an inhuman wretch,
Uncapable of pity, void and empty
From any dram of mercy…

_____

But mercy is above this sceptred sway,
It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself;
And earthly power doth then show likest God’s
When mercy seasons justice. Therefore, Jew,
Though justice be thy plea, consider this,
That in the course of justice none of us
Should see salvation; we do pray for mercy,
And that same prayer doth teach us all to render
The deeds of mercy.

–The Merchant of Venice by Wm. Shakespeare

__________


The liberals are behaving like the villain in an old mystery movie, who, having committed a murder, must now kill everyone who can connect him to that murder. Sometimes the villain feels remorse, but in many cases the villain is a pre-repentant Raskolnikov: like the liberals, he is following a ‘higher morality. Some inconsequential, worthless nobody is standing in the way of his happiness, so he must kill that worthless, inconsequential nobody. And if other inconsequential, worthless nobodies try to connect him to the first murder, he kills them as well.

The liberals have murdered the image of God in Man, which is Christ the Lord, because He was an inconsequential nobody who stood in the way of their happiness. And now they must kill all the inconsequential nobodies who were connected to Him and will continually accuse them, the liberals, of murder. Unlike the villain in the mystery movie, the liberals will not confine their murderous rampages to those people whom they know are directly connected to the first victim; they feel compelled to kill all those who they suspect might be connected to the first victim even tangentially. This is why the entire white race, minus the liberals, must be eliminated. There must be none left that can stand in the way of the liberals’ multi-racial utopia presided over by Atticus Finch liberals. Of course such a utopia is not the vision of the colored barbarians; the colored barbarians do not want any whites, not even Atticus Finch, in their world, but the liberals have never had any connection to the stranger called ‘Reality.’ If they did, they wouldn’t be liberals.

The liberals can’t, in reality, eliminate Christ by exterminating the white race, but the liberals do not believe in the reality of the Son of God. They think He is a mind-forged creation of racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic whites. So they think that they can eliminate that mind-forged evil by eliminating the white race. It seems suicidal, because are not the liberals white? Yes, in reality (there’s that irksome word again) they are white. But again, we need to emphasize that the liberals have no connection to reality, they live in an abstract fantasy world where all other whites will be destroyed while they, the illuminati, have gone beyond whiteness to … That higher state varies from liberal to liberal, but it is always a higher elevation from which they hurl thunderbolts at the hideous white race. The liberals’ hatred of the white race is even greater than the colored barbarians’ hatred, because the liberals are in a constant state of dread. They fear that they might be placed among the damned, the racist whites. Hence, their constant, fervent busyness in defense of the non-white and in defiance of the white. Look at their opposition to Trump, a 1950s liberal. The liberals have gone beyond mad-dog liberalism in their opposition to him: they have bared their satanic fangs. Why? There is only one explanation – they are possessed. They hate whites with a passion fueled by Satan. Trump has done nothing that places him outside the parameters of what classical liberalism is supposed to be, but classical liberalism was never really liberal, in the moral sense, at heart. It was not about compassion for the poor or the enfranchisement of the disenfranchised. It was, and is, about the destruction of the white Christ-bearing race. You will be eternally pushing Sisyphus’s rock up the democratic hill unless you come to grips with that essential fact – Liberalism is from the devil. Through the liberals and the colored barbarians, Satan strikes back at Christ by attacking the Christ-bearing race. The race war is a religious war. Satan does not care if he has to kill every white on the face of the earth in order to kill the tiny remnant of whites still connected to Christ. Non-Christian whites are collateral damage in the great war between Satan and Christ.

When I speak of Christ as the true God, I am speaking of a very specific Christ. I am speaking of the Christ of old Europe. That Christ is not a time-bound Christ of an archaic culture, He is the Christ of the Gospels, the Christ whom St. Paul encountered on the road to Damascus. People of other races can come to the Savior, but only if they respond to the light emanating from the hearth fire of the antique Europeans. When Ben Gunn says he has not had a Christian diet for three years, there is no need for him to explain that he has not had any European food for three years. Stevenson’s readers knew that Europe and Christ were an incorporate union. That union was not perfect because we are not perfect, but our Lord chose, with a charity that passeth the understanding of the mind, but that can be understood by the heart, to forgive us our trespasses and take the European people onto Himself, because the European people loved much. It is only now, when the Europeans have ceased to love much (for how can they love an abstract Christ without a local habitation by their racial hearth fire?) that they feel forsaken and have gone whoring after heathen gods and heathen systems, such as the negroes, the Islamic hordes, and science.

In every century since the European people joined their hearts and souls to Christ, there have been creatures called ‘liberals’ who sought to destroy the incorporate union between Christ and the European people. Initially the subversive element came from outside of clan Europe. The subversives were predominantly the unrepentant Jews who refused to believe that the Messiah had come. But as intellectual Christianity, the Christianity of the false Aslan, took hold in Europe, the Christian churches started turning out anti-Christian soldiers who were more dangerous than the Jews, because a wolf in sheep’s clothing is worse than a plain wolf. As terrible as George Soros and his ilk are, they are not as harmful to the Christian remnant as Pope Francis and his legions of wolves in sheep’s clothing. In the name of Christ, these anti-Christian wolves assault Christ and His people. I know that the neo-pagans would like to sum up the tragedy of the European people with, “Jew, Jew, Jew!” But Satan is much more subtle than that. The problem is liberalism. A great deal of Jews are liberals, but still it is not Jews who currently fill up the ranks of the liberals’ armies – it is lapsed Christians who have become, like the neo-pagans themselves, as adamantly opposed to the light of the world as the Jews. For every George Soros, who should be opposed as we would oppose the devil himself, there are the Pope Francises and twenty more Hillary Clintons. Our enemies are legion, and they are not just confined within the ranks of the Jews.

The obsessive focus on the exterior Jew only is the weakness of the biological determinist type of conservative. If it is only the visible, identifiable Jew who is the enemy, the biological determinist conservative, the neo-pagan, does not have to look inside his own soul. The Christian knows that he must not only fight the liberalism that is without, he also knows that he must also fight the liberalism from within. We all, if we look within, have too much of Ivan Karamazov in us. We do not like the way God has ordered the world, so we are tempted to re-order the world according to our own will. Only Christ could say, “not my will, but thy will be done,” with complete sincerity. Nevertheless, there is a great difference between the Christian European who fights the Ivan Karamazov within himself and the liberal who gives himself over to the Ivan Karamazov within. It is the difference between heaven and hell. Our people, the people who formed an incorporate union with Christ and fought the good fight, loved Him through their people, because of His promise to be with them “alway even unto the end of the world.” Such was the incorporate union between Christ and the European people.

By the beginning of the 20th century, most of the European, intellectual elites had either embraced intellectual Christianity, which is simply another form of atheism, or they had become outright liberals, whoring after new gods. But even though Christian belief faded in Europe during the first half of the 20th century, a Christian ethos remained until the latter half of the 20th century. Europeans were living on what Herbert Butterfield called the “fumes” of Christianity. There was still, in the 20th century, a Christian hangover. The liberals retained some remnants of mercy, but now the hangover is over. The era of ‘no mercy’ has begun. This is not a theory, it is a sad new chapter of European history. There are no remnants of Christianity left in the liberals. They are preceding toward utopia, which must be built with white blood, without the mercy that used to separate the European from the colored barbarians. The woman of Calais’s heartfelt cry for mercy would have moved any human heart from another era, but in the era of ‘no mercy’ her plea fell on deaf ears. The liberals do not care about the suffering of whites. Quite the contrary, they delight in their suffering. The liberals, whether they are Jew or gentile, have become Shylock. They want a pound of flesh nearest the heart from every white man, woman, and child. Their satanic god demands it, and they know no higher law than his will.

It’s not pleasant to be at the mercy of an enemy that has no mercy, but there is no escaping it: we are in the hands of an enemy who has left every last remnant of Christianity behind and ventured into a brave new world where faith, hope, and charity are considered blasphemies, while murderous cruelty is considered noble and inspiring. In his novel Pierre, Herman Melville wrote that a man in dangerous straits is like unto a drowning man: “Well enough he knows he is in peril, well enough he knows the cause of that peril, but the sea is the sea and the drowning man does drown.” That is true enough if we have placed our hopes in reason. We can’t reason with the liberals, because human beings are not governed by reason. They use their reason to defend their passions:

In every doctrine which wins men over to it, the sophistry it contains is less potent than the promises it makes; its power over them is greater through their sensibility than through their intelligence; for, if the heart is often the dupe of the head, the latter is much more frequently the dupe of the former. We do not accept a system because we deem it a true one, but because the truth we find in it suits us. Political or religious fanaticism, any theological or philosophical channel in which truth flows, always has its source in some ardent longing, some secret passion, some accumulation of intense, painful desire to which a theory affords an outlet;

–The French Revolution by Hippolyte Taine

If reason governed liberals would they claim to love children while sponsoring the wholesale slaughter of babies in the womb? Would they claim to be against rape while encouraging the wholesale sexual abuse of women by Moslems? Would they claim to love black people while condemning the white people who actually helped black people, such as the apartheid white South Africans and the pre-Civil War Southerners? Would they claim to be in favor of peaceful, non-violent government while fomenting violence and anarchy every time an election doesn’t go their way? Would they claim to be against nuclear war and remain at enmity with a rival nuclear power because that nation is a nationalist nation and not a communist one? And would they actually believe that the white race, the Christ-bearing race, the only race that gave the world a vision of the incarnate God, is the source of all evil in the world? None of those ‘would theys’ are rational; they can’t be explained by Socratic reason, they don’t make sense philosophically. But we can understand the rational contradictions of the liberals if we look at man through the eyes of the poet rather than with the mind of the philosopher. Man is not governed by his reason. He is governed, for good or evil, by his passion. The liberals are possessed of a passionate hatred for Christ and the Christ-bearing race. There might be an occasional road to Damascus conversion in their ranks, but in the main they will remain what they have become, the spawns of Satan. They are no longer human beings, they are like unto Lady Macbeth who invited Satan to fill her, “from the crown to the toe top-full of direst cruelty! Make thick my blood; Stop up th’ access and passage to remorse, That no compunctious visitings of nature Shake my fell purpose, nor keep peace between Th’ Effect and it!” Is it any wonder that such creatures from hell have joined with the colored barbarians in a holy war against the white race? It is the passion of Satan, which consists of dire cruelty, against… It should be Satan and his minions against the European people who stand with Christ, who is the spiritual fount of Europe. But Europeans no longer feel that they need to put on the whole armor of God to do battle with the devil and his minions. They don’t believe in such things any more. They believe in science, reason, and the democratic process. We have become too intelligent to believe that men with a passionate love for their people and the God who loved so much that He was crucified for their sake, can triumph over Satan and his minions.

The passionate love of kith, kin, and God will bring us safely home. Dr. Verwoerd, of sacred memory, enjoins us not to “consider ourselves wise or learned or big when we abandon our people.” Anthony Jacob tells us that, “charity not only begins at home, it perishes without one.” And St. Paul, the passionate apostle, tells us that he will show us a better way than reason and prophecy:

Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.

-1 Corinthians 13: 8-13

Only one people, as a people, actually tried to make charity the heart and soul of their civilization. Are we now going to completely step away from those blessed Europeans and cede everything to the liberals and the colored heathens? It seems like we are. But there is something in the civilization of the antique Europeans that provides us with hope. The people who loved much knew that the divine love of Christ would ultimately lead them out of the valley of the shadow of death into the light. The people of old Europe, our people, believed in the triumph of the light over darkness: “In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.” Neither the liberals nor the colored heathens shall have power over us if we become what our ancestors were, and what we are destined to be – the Christ-bearing people, who love their people and their God with a passionate intensity that passeth the understanding of the liberals, the colored heathens, and Satan himself. “Thus is our faith tested” – our faith has been burned into our hearts: “Charity never faileth.” +

Posted in Charity, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A World Without Mercy

For God, for Hearth, and for Race

Posted on March 4, 2017 by cwny

The noon-day train will bring Frank Miller
If I’m a man I must be brave
And I must face a deadly killer
Or lie a coward, a craven coward
Or lie a coward in my grave.

-from “The Ballad of High Noon”

_____

The Europeans have been to the mountain and have stood on holy ground. And they have stood on holy ground because they embraced the little human things that lead us to God. St. Paul is the greatest of all theologians because his epistles are addressed to small groups of individual human beings. All transcendent thought comes from a concern for particular human beings. Shakespeare’s “simple” stories take us to the heights and depths because Shakespeare is concerned with the human heart, not with theories about humanity. And likewise the incomparable Burke; his letters are irreplaceable works of genius because he wrote them from his heart, without moral blinders on, to stir the hearts of other human beings who still had hearts that lived.

Modern Europeans have contracted a brain fever that has gotten into their blood. Until that fever breaks, there is nothing that can be done with them. They will continue to worship the negro and try to appease the lords of Liberaldom. But if that fever should finally break! It would be like water released from a gigantic dam. All of Liberaldom would be washed away. Do we know the day and the hour of that great cleansing?  Of course we don’t, because the human heart and God’s grace are mysteries. But when the European’s fever breaks, the moral blinders will be removed from his heart, and he will dream dreams and see visions again of a Babe in a Manger and a Man of Sorrows.

-CWNY

_____

On the instant stood revealed, as though he had blown down the ages, a pure Goth, unchanged in any essential since his fathers had left their forests and through all obstacles, even through ranks of Roman legionaries, sword in hand had hewn their way straight to the goal of their desires. He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart—a Goth.

-Thomas Nelson Page in Under the Crust

__________

The liberals spew out venomous lies on a regular basis and call the lies ‘news stories.’ And then they have the audacity to call the real news sites, such as Breitbart, ‘fake news’ sites. Of course the liberals know that they are lying, but lying is permissible in a war, and the liberals are engaged in a holy war against the white race. In a war you never tell the enemy the truth and you try to win adherents to your side by putting out wartime propaganda. CNN and their ilk throughout the European world are propaganda networks; they are not news networks.

The alternative news sites, which are the only genuine news sites, do not put out lies, but they do, unwittingly, perpetuate a lie. That lie is the modern democratic lie, which says that people of different races and different religions can somehow come together and form a nation in which whatever differences they might have can be settled democratically. This cannot be, and the United States and the other democratic, anti-white nations of Europe have shown that a democratic, multi-racial, multi-religious state cannot be.

It is the liberals, not the Breitbart conservative types, who understand what is happening. We are engaged in a full blown war, but only one side, the liberal side, is fighting. While the liberals have made a commitment to do whatever it takes to turn Christendom into Satandom, the conservatives, the believers in democracy, persist in playing ‘pretend.’ They want to pretend that if you keep doing the democratic things – putting out news stories that are truthful, engaging in debates with your liberal opponents, and exhorting people to support the proper political candidates, you can win the democracy game. But the liberals are not willing to play by the rules of the democracy game. They are at war with the Christ-bearing people. It is no good to leave Christ out of the picture and claim you want nothing to do with Him, that you just want to be democratic. The liberals won’t listen — if you are white, you cannot be redeemed, you must be destroyed. The tragedy of the alternative right conservatives is that they have a vague desire to defend the white race, but they have no religious foundation from which to launch an attack on Liberaldom. Hence, they attack liberals through the democratic process. And that process is a circular road that winds around through hell.

The alternative-news-sites people give out mixed signals. The news they report gives us clear evidence that we are in a war with the liberals and the colored barbarians. Yet, the conservatives who put out the news act like we are living in a world where we are all in agreement about what is fundamentally important, while simply differing on the details of how we should remain true to what is fundamentally important. This disconnect, to report on the liberals’ satanic agenda and the colored barbarians’ atrocities as if it is simply business as usual, breeds despair in the white remnant. The white everyman tries to make himself believe that the old democratic ways will work, that he can vote, petition, and democratically debate his troubles away. But late at night, when he is alone in the darkness, he has a sense of impending doom. Something is wrong, there is a dreadful beast pursuing him, and he cannot shake the beast off by taking refuge in the democratic process. And the reason he can’t take refuge in the democratic process is because it is the democratic process that has loosed the beast upon the white everyman.

What is missing in the business-as-usual reportage of the conservatives is the passionate advocacy of an Edmund Burke or an Anthony Jacob. Those men not only reported on the liberals’ blasphemies and the colored barbarians’ atrocities, they were also advocates for the Christian European hearth fire. They didn’t just disagree with the liberals, they hated them. And they didn’t prefer a white system over other systems because they thought the white system was the ‘smart’ way to govern, they preferred their people over all other people because they loved their people. And that is the crux of the issue – the conservatives want to preserve some of liberalism – they are not comfortable with an outright advocacy of a white, Christian nation. But you can’t have just a little bit of liberalism, just as you can’t have a little bit of cancer. Once the cancer has appeared, it must be eradicated, or it will kill you.

Let me stay with the cancer analogy because, sadly, we all are familiar with that hideous disease. If a doctor tells you all the gruesome details of your cancerous disease, he is being no more than truthful, he is doing his job just as the Breitbart reporter who reports on the liberals’ blasphemies and the colored barbarians’ atrocities is doing his job. But what if the doctor tells you the horrific details without telling you about your chances for survival? Has he told you the whole truth? Or what if he tells you that your cancer can be cured by drinking enormous quantities of Coca-Cola and consuming large amounts of Twinkies? All of the grim atrocity stories should be followed by an advocacy of the Christian things – of honor, of kinship, and of the charity that never faileth. We should steer whites away from Coca-Cola and Twinkies political solutions, and toward the faith, blood, and soil solutions of our European ancestors.

I recently saw an interview with one of the practical, realistic breed of conservatives, who was discussing Europe. His conclusion was that Europe, particularly Germany, was finished. His analysis was quite rational and logical – Germany was being overrun by Moslems and Africans and the German people were incapable and/or unwilling to resist them. Rape, murder, and pillage is the German people’s destiny – that was the realistic, factual conservative’s irrefutable conclusion. Let me make a brief aside before responding to the conservative’s ‘realistic’ assessment: I’ve been blessed with many children. Yes, contra Planned Parenthood, I believe that children are a blessing. And of course, I love all my children, but I’ve noticed over the years that the intensity of my loving concern for an individual child is determined by his or her need. If one child is physically sick or especially troubled, my concern for that child is intensified. So it is with Europe. I love the European people with all my heart, mind, and soul. I am of Europe, and I only know Him in and through Europe. Ratty’s river and my Europe are one. (1) But my extra special concern right now is Germany. That nation, that child, is the most besieged and despised nation of Europe. Germany is, in terms of her danger and the hatred directed against her, a surrogate for all European nations. Our danger differs in degree, not in kind, from the danger that Germany is now facing. Like Will Kane and Shane, the German people, and all European people, are facing that “immediate and implacable moment” when they must choose to fight as Europeans were meant to fight – for God, for hearth, and for race – or to run like craven cowards before the liberals and their colored allies.

Let us go back to the practical, realistic conservative – “Europe, particularly Germany, is finished.” Case closed? No, it is not closed. The practical conservative has ignored, like Ivan Karamazov, the elephant in the room. Ivan makes a very good case, the very best case that can be made, against God. He places suffering humanity before Alyosha and challenges him to refute that crystal clear fact of existence: We suffer and die. What is Alyosha’s response? He simply says that Ivan has left out the one thing that tips the balance in favor of a loving God. Ivan has left out the Man of Sorrows, our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

There are other facts of history besides Spengler’s facts of biological destiny. Human beings are not just biological entities. They have souls. Christian Europe is a ‘fact’ of history. The Europeans spiritual ascent in the past, as a people, is just as much a fact of history as is their current spiritual decline. Our individual biological destinies are written. We shall die in the flesh – but our spiritual destiny? That is not determined solely by biology. No nation of Europe is finished, because there is no telling what will happen if the European people act in and through the Christ of the European hearth fire. Certainly, the Germans — and the rest of Europe is close behind – have their backs to the wall. But we must not be willfully blind and accept Ivan Karamazov’s verdict as the final verdict. There is the Man of Sorrows: nothing is impossible with and through Him.

I’ve often pondered, and even more so now as the European light fades from off the face of the earth, why our Lord thought it was necessary to bring St. Paul front and center on the stage (for all the world is indeed a stage) of our salvation history. What did St. Paul bring to the church that the other apostles could not bring, at least not as well as St. Paul? The other apostles preached the Gospel, and St. Peter, albeit with divine prodding, extended the Christian message to the Gentile as well as the Jew. So what did St. Paul bring to the church? It is crystal clear if you read his epistles with your heart. St. Paul brought a passionate intensity to the Christian faith that was unconquerable. All the other apostles preached Christ crucified, Christ risen, but St. Paul set that message on fire and drove it into the hearts of his convertites. And St. Paul’s Christ was the Christ of the early Europeans that turned the more intellectual, Romanized faith back to its passionate Pauline roots:

The Nordic religion was not a religion of dread, or of magic formularies to propitiate hostile powers. Instead of covering its temples with frescoes of the tortures of the damned, it taught people not to be afraid of death. Its ideal was the fellowship of the hero with the gods, not merely in feasting and victory, but in danger and defeat. For the gods, too, are in the hands of fate, and the Scandinavian vision of the twilight of the gods that was to end the world showed the heroes dying valiantly in the last hopeless fight against the forces of chaos—loyal and fearless to the last. It is an incomplete but not an ignoble religion. It contains those elements of character which it was the special mission of the Nordic peoples to add to modern civilization and to Christianity itself. 

– G. M. Trevelyan in History of England

The Europeans of the 19th century (see “The Sacred Heritage”) were faced with the same Jacobin and colored barbarian threat that we face now. But they turned back the liberal and colored heathen tide by returning to their Pauline roots. Charity, not rationalism, never faileth. It is not over: We are not facing the death of Europe, we are facing a possibility of death, “if these shadows are not altered.” The shadow of death, the death caused by liberalism, can be altered. We are not being defeated in every European nation because of the superior might of the colored heathens: We are being defeated because we do not see ourselves as one people, bound to each other by unbreakable bonds of faith and race. Once we unite what should never have been separated, our faith in Christ and our racial kinship, we will see the same European miracles that Alfred, Charles Martel, and the soldiers of Rorke’s Drift saw. +

___________________________

(1) `I beg your pardon,’ said the Mole, pulling himself together with an effort. `You must think me very rude; but all this is so new to me. So–this–is–a–River!’

`THE River,’ corrected the Rat.

`And you really live by the river? What a jolly life!’

`By it and with it and on it and in it,’ said the Rat. `It’s brother and sister to me, and aunts, and company, and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It’s my world, and I don’t want any other. What it hasn’t got is not worth having, and what it doesn’t know is not worth knowing

-Kenneth Grahame in The Wind in the Willows

Posted in Blood faith, Christ the Hero, Democracy, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on For God, for Hearth, and for Race

From the Dark Night of Negro Worship into the Light of Europe

Posted on February 25, 2017 by cwny

It has appeared to some that the South has not done its full duty by the negro. Perfection is, without doubt, a standard above humanity; but, at least, we of the South can say that we have done much for him; if we have not admitted him to social equality, it has been under an instinct stronger than reason, and in obedience to a law higher than the one in the statute books: the law of self-preservation. Slavery, whatever its demerits, was not in its time the unmitigated evil it is fancied to have been. Its time has passed. No power could compel the South to have it back. But to the negro it was salvation. It found him a savage and a cannibal and in two hundred years gave seven millions of his race a civilization, the only civilization it has had since the dawn of history.

We have educated him; we have aided him; we have sustained him in all right directions. We are ready to continue our aid; but we will not be dominated by him. When we shall be, it is our settled conviction that we shall deserve the degradation into which we shall have sunk. – Thomas Nelson Page in The Old South (1892)

_____

Yes, in other words the ignorance of our Western liberal intellectuals is killing us. The distortion of their university-adjusted vision is such that even when they clearly perceive every detail of a given situation, the picture in the mirror of their intellects is invariably upside down. It is a form of insanity, ethical as well as intellectual; an insanity which takes the form of a blind belief in the efficacy of so-called ‘good’ principles regardless of the circumstances in which they are applied; such as the giving of The Vote to people who cannot read or write, and the granting of ‘National Self-determination’ to tribes of stark naked cannibals. It is a ‘sideways with the people’ insanity; one of the deadliest of its manifestations being the belief that true goodness consists in depriving oneself of the power to do good. It is an insanity compelling liberal politicians to delight in bringing about the utter subjugation of their own white race. – Anthony Jacob in White Man, Think Again! (1965)

_____

The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. – Romans 13: 12

_____

Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. – Ephesians 6: 11

__________

If a politician began a public speech one hundred years ago with the Lord’s Prayer, it would not have been an act of courage. It could have reflected a deep conviction of the politician or it might have simply been a formalistic ritual, a condescending nod to the public sentiment, but in either case the politician would not have needed a great deal of courage to say the prayer. That is not the case today. In a Jacobin age, in which “separation of church  and state” has become a God phrase, to begin a state speech with the Lord’s Prayer is an act of courage. And I thought the First Lady’s foreign accent added particular grace to the moment. Mrs. Trump’s prayer emphasized that the only legitimate immigration is white immigration. And when we place into the equation the fact that Melania Trump knows that the enemy has pictures of her posing in lingerie that they can splash all over the internet to make the case that she is a hypocrite, we must applaud her courage. I do not applaud courage that is not for the Christian things, but when it is courage in His name, I honor it.

Sadly – actually it is worse than sad, it is tragic – the Trump phenomenon is not grounded in something substantial. There is an under-current of white pietas in the Trump movement, which is why the liberals hate him more than Richard Nixon, but the stated purpose of Trump’s crusade is still within the confines, or to be more accurate, the chains of racial and global universalism. This will not do. The black supporters of Trump should be the leaders of either a separate Bantu state as in Dr. Verwoerd’s South Africa, or the leaders in a separate black state within a white nation. Blacks cannot be part of a white nation, because they are incapable of living amongst whites without bringing death and destruction to whites. In point of fact they are incapable of self-government, but they can rise above the level of complete barbarism if they are aided by Christian whites, as was the case in the pre-Civil War South and in Dr. Verwoerd’s South Africa.

That liberals do not care about blacks is made crystal clear when we see the calumny that is heaped on the aforementioned civilizations which have the distinction of being the only civilizations that ever improved the blacks’ lives materially and spiritually. If you had a very sick child, wouldn’t you, if you loved your child, opt for a medical procedure that had been used successfully in the past? Or would you choose a medical procedure that was a proven failure?

Liberals always choose utopian remedies for all social ills, because they have rejected the traditional Christian faith of the European people. And, having rejected that faith, they must come up with an alternative faith to sustain them. The liberals’ alternative faith is Jacobinism, which entails a worship of a theoretical aggregate called ‘the people.’ Haiti, after the French revolution, represents Jacobinism in its purest form. The rest of the European nations moved toward utopia more incrementally, from a white aggregate of proletarians to a black aggregate of pure, natural savages. Any political movement that does not attack the very core of liberalism, which is the satanic ideology of negro worship, will be absorbed by liberalism.

The liberals, like the Ancient Mariner, have shot the albatross, but unlike the Ancient Mariner they are not repentant. They continue to build their new world as if there was no fall of man and no Redeemer. Indeed, if there was no fall of man why do we need a Redeemer? But the liberals still have a plan of salvation – God the Father is the abstracted intellect of man, the Savior is the natural black savage in the aggregate, and science is the Holy Ghost. As regards the Holy Ghost – didn’t Pope Francis just tell us that Islamic terrorism is a myth, while global warming is a scientific fact? We must not be blasphemers against the liberals’ Holy Ghost.

The Jacobin revolution never could have succeeded, and it would never have spread, if the traditional bred-in-the- bone European Christianity had not been replaced by the worship of the Church as an organization dedicated to religious and racial universalism. That type of Church, as opposed to the church of faithful hearts united to His heart, can be made compatible with Jacobin utopianism – witness Price, Priestly, Belloc, John Paul II, Pope Francis, and the legion of modern, anti-Christian, anti-European churchmen who have placed themselves in the liberals’ camp, opposed to their people and their God.

When the spirit of God enters human hearts, through Christ our Lord, the spirit of satanic abstraction dies, and the charity that never faileth takes hold. Christian civilizations are always imperfect because Christian men are still sons of Adam. But the sons of Adam who are repentant Christians have that within which constitutes the only humane civilizing influence on a nation. The inhumane, unrepentant liberals can only mock and destroy all that is good and noble, which is why they are driven to destroy every last vestige of antique Europe. A movement based on turning back the clock to a milder, gentler Jacobinism can never succeed, because the essence of Jacobinism is ever-onward to a Haitian-style state devoid of faith, hope, and charity – a state in which all people worship darkness and not the light.

The last Christian state on the face of the earth was the aforementioned South Africa, presided over by Dr. H. F. Verwoerd, the last great Christian European leader in a leaderless world. The dagger to his heart (which came from a half-breed Marxist zealot) was a dagger to the heart of the Christian European people. It was Dr. Verwoerd who first used the term ‘negro psychosis’ to describe the great sickness of the European people. He knew, because he loved his people and his God, that the Church of Christ consisted of one’s people, one’s kith and kin, who love a personal God, not an abstract, satanic liberal trinity.

What are we in South Africa going to do in that future? My answer is that this will depend on the question of whether we will be able to maintain our anchors. For me this means that we should keep our identity as a people, that we should not become international, that we should not consider ourselves wise or learned or big when we abandon our people. But secondly – and this is the most important – this anchor must ensure that we keep our faith. If we can stay anchored in our faith and thus in our Church, those big changes can do nothing that spells danger to us as a people who hold fast to God and his Word.

–Verwoerd Speaks

Of course it was not to be; the South African leaders after Dr. Verwoerd did not stay loyal to their people or to the Word of God. And are not the two inseparable? Can there be an abstract Christian church without a local habitation in the collective heart of the European people? And can the European people be a people if they do not take Christ into their hearts? Faith and kith and kin must be joined or else all is cheerless, dark, and deadly. Trump’s concern for working class whites and his wife’s public prayer show us that the Trump movement has some remnants of grace, but it is still a movement from within liberalism. And there can be no reconciliation, no peaceful accord, with liberalism. White South Africa is the world. Any resistance to black rule, which is the rule of Satan, will be dealt with by the use of lying, cheating, and then, if those tactics fail, by assassination and murder. No European nation is immune from the fatal disease – the negro psychosis. Even in nations of Eastern Europe, where the people have shown some resistance to the Moslem invasion, we see the ‘I am not racist’ flag, which is the flag of surrender to the devil, being raised. Our skin color is part of our spiritual essence. If we place the white race in subservience to the black race – and diversity means black dominance – we have put the Christ-bearing race at the service of Satan. And that is precisely what the liberals want, because they worship darkness and not the light. Our white ancestors knew about the connection between the sons of Ham and the devil. They knew about such things, because they were connected to His sacred heart, the source of all true wisdom. They were prejudiced in favor of the sacred things and prejudiced against Satan and his works. Our people used to know instinctively that the negro was death to the white man’s civilization. Burke talks about this in Letters on a Regicide Peace:

How must we feel, if the pride and flower of the English Nobility and Gentry, who might escape the pestilential clime, and the devouring sword, should, if taken prisoners, be delivered over as rebel subjects, to be condemned as rebels, as traitors, as the vilest of all criminals, by tribunals formed of Maroon negro slaves, covered over with the blood of their masters, who were made free and organized into judges, for their robberies and murders?

And again, in his essay, “On the Sublime and Beautiful” –

Perhaps it may appear on inquiry that blackness and darkness are in some degree painful by their natural operation, independent of any associations whatsoever. I must observe, that the ideas of darkness and blackness are much the same; and they differ only in this, that blackness is a more confined idea. Mr. Cheselden has given us a very curious story of a boy, who had been born blind, and continued so until he was thirteen or fourteen years old; he was then couched for a cataract, by which operation he received his sight. Among many remarkable particulars that attended his first perceptions and judgments on visual objects, it gave him great uneasiness; and that some time after, upon accidentally seeing a negro woman, he was struck with great horror at the sight. The horror, in this case, can scarcely be supposed to arise from any association. The boy appears by the account to have been particularly observing and sensible for one of his age; and therefore it is probable, if the great uneasiness he felt at the first sight of black had arisen from its connexion with any other disagreeable ideas, he would have observed and mentioned it. For an idea, disagreeable only by association, has the cause of its ill effect on the passions evident enough at the first impression; in ordinary cases, it is indeed frequently lost; but this is, because the original association was made very early, and the consequent impression repeated often. In our instance, there was no time for such a habit; and there is no reason to think that the ill effects of black on his imagination were more owing to its connexion with any disagreeable ideas, than that the good effects of more cheerful colours were derived from their connexion with pleasuring ones. They had both probably their effects from their natural operation.

There are four forces present in the United States, which are also present in all of the other European nations as well. The first force is that of the mad-dog liberals. They rule most of the European nations and their credo is quite simple – the white race must be destroyed immediately and by ‘any means necessary.’ The second force consists of the conservative-liberals, who rule in a few European nations, but their credo differs only in degree, not in kind, from the mad-dog liberals. Their credo is that the whites must be destroyed, but only incrementally; they should not be destroyed immediately nor should they be dispossessed violently; they must be democratically phased out. The third force consists of populists such as Donald Trump and Le Pen. This group wants white people to be accorded the right to live and work in the nations that they founded and sustained. The liberals will never allow such a faction to exist within the confines of Liberaldom, because liberalism is based on the destruction of the white race. Populists are always puzzled by the liberals’ hatred of them, because they say nothing against, in their view, the tenets of liberalism. What the populists do not understand is the Orwellian nature of liberalism. “All are equal, but some are more equal.” Liberalism is not about equality, liberty, and fraternity, it is about merciless cruelty and the extermination of the white race. In a recent conversation with an elderly Trump supporter, I was asked why the liberals hate him so. I told the woman it was because Trump does not want to exterminate the white race. “But why do the liberals want to exterminate the white race?” was her next question. “Because they worship darkness and not the light,” was my reply.

The fourth faction within Liberaldom is the colored heathens – the blacks, the Moslems, the Mexicans, etc. They are the liberals’ shock troops, and they are, collectively, the second person of the liberals’ unholy trinity. In a perverse parody of the Christ story, the colored heathens have become incarnate in Liberaldom, they have come to save the liberals from sin and death, which, in the eyes of the liberals, is personified in the white race. The liberals fervently believe that if the white race dies so does sin and death.

When there was a Western civilization, men such as Edmund Burke, Thomas Nelson Page, Anthony Jacob, and H. F. Verwoerd stressed that it was the European people and their Christian faith that must be conserved, not democracy nor Churchianity. Now that there are no conservatives who want to conserve Christian Europeans, the liberals have turned Europe into Heathendom. What must men who still love old Europe do? We must be counterrevolutionaries. We cannot look to conservative liberals or even to populist leaders to lead us out of the darkness of liberalism. We must look to counterrevolutionary leaders such as … Jesus Christ, who is “the beginning and the end, the first and the last.” The Lord’s Prayer is the start of the European counterrevolution – “Thy will be done on earth as it is in Heaven.” Surely it is not His will that the Christ-bearing race should abandon Christ and fall down on their faces to worship the negro. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Christian counter-attack, Jacobinism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on From the Dark Night of Negro Worship into the Light of Europe

The End of Democracy Is the New Dawn of Europe

Posted on February 18, 2017 by cwny

They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate.

-Edmund Burke

_____

O worthy Duke,
You bid me seek redemption of the devil.

Isabella in Measure for Measure

__________

When the irreverent Dr. Price exulted when Louis the XVI was led in triumph through the streets of Paris by the Jacobins, Burke demanded to know why Dr. Price should exult in the King’s humiliation and dethronement:

But the Reverend Pastor exults in this “leading in triumph,” because truly Louis the Sixteenth was “an arbitrary monarch;” that is, in other words, neither more nor less than because he was Louis the Sixteenth, and because he had the misfortune to be born king of France, with the prerogatives of which, a long line of ancestors, and a long acquiescence of the people, without any act of his, had put him in possession. A misfortune it has indeed turned out to him, that he was born king of France. But misfortune is not crime, nor is indiscretion always the greatest guilt. I shall never think that a prince, the acts of whose whole reign was a series of concessions to his subjects, who was willing to relax his authority, to remit his prerogatives, to call his people to a share of freedom, not known, perhaps not desired by their ancestors; such a prince, though he should be subjected to the common frailties attached to men and to princes, though he should have once thought it necessary to provide force against the desperate designs manifestly carrying on against his person, and the remnants of his authority; though all this should be taken into consideration, I shall be led with great difficulty to think he deserves the cruel and insulting triumph of Paris and of Dr. Price. I tremble for the cause of liberty, from such an example to kings. I tremble for the cause of humanity, in the unpunished outrages of the most wicked of mankind.

–Burke in Reflections on the French Revolution

So must I demand to know why Hillary Clinton exulted in the 9th District Court judges’ refusal to uphold Trump’s order to temporarily restrict Moslem immigration from a handful of Moslem countries. Why would a citizen of the United States or any other European nation object to such a small restriction on Moslem immigration, especially considering that a complete ban on Moslem immigration and the deportation of every single Moslem in the European nations is necessary for the protection of the European people? Hillary exulted for the same reason that Dr. Price exulted: The Moslems are committed to the destruction of the white Christian race, just as the Jacobins were and Hillary is committed to the destruction of the white Christian race.

There has never been, nor can there ever be, a multi-cultural or multi-racial nation. There might be little counter-cultural enclaves and other slave races within a dominant racial culture, but there will always be one dominant culture and one dominant race within a nation. The striking thing about the European nations of the late 20th and early 21st centuries is that the majority culture, the people who were in charge of the government, willingly made the colored heathens into the dominant culture and the dominant race. There was, in South Africa, before the ascendency of the black government, a minority culture ruling a majority culture. But in that case, the colored heathens did not willingly give up their dominance. It was taken from them as was also the case in British India. It is only the European people who willingly ceded their racial dominance and cultural identity to the heathens of other races. Why have they done this? Let us turn to Herman Melville for an answer, as he describes in Moby Dick, the man keeping watch atop the masthead:

There is no life in thee, now, except that rocking life imparted by a gently rolling ship; by her, borrowed from the sea; by the sea, from the inscrutable tides of God. But while this sleep, this dream is on ye, move your foot or hand an inch; slip your hold at all; and your identity comes back in horror. Over Descartian vortices you hover. And perhaps, at mid-day, in the fairest weather, with one half-throttled shriek you drop through that transparent air into the summer sea, no more to rise for ever. Heed it well, ye Pantheists!

A religion based on philosophical speculation cannot sustain a people. Once faith in the God-Man, Jesus Christ, was replaced by organized propositional religion, the Europeans became Pantheists; they blended their Lord and Savior with philosophy and the heathen faiths. At the moment such a philosophical blending takes place the stage is set for racial blending and then racial suicide. The white race is the first and only race to commit racial suicide, because the white race is the only race that attempted to love the Savior in spirit and truth. But if you falter, having once taken up the cross, what will happen? You will hover over “Descartian vortices” for a certain time and then plunge to your death in the sea of racial and religious universalism.

First the Americans and then the French tried to build a culture over the “Descartian vortices” of religious, racial, and cultural universalism. Then one by one all the nations of Europe followed the lead of the Americans and the French Jacobins. What the European clergymen had wrought came to fruition in the Europeans’ culture – they became the first race to commit racial suicide.

I had hoped, before Trump’s victory, that his election would serve as a rearguard action for the European people – that it would give them some time to prepare for the real battle, the fight against Jacobin democracy. But the rearguard movement has failed. Trump tried, as valiantly as Marshal Ney, but he has been unable to delay the liberal juggernaut. To defeat the liberals was never even a goal of Trump or his supporters, and that is probably why Trump could not even slow down the liberals’ process. If you can’t match the liberals’ passionate hatred of the Christ-bearing race with a passionate hatred for the liberals and the colored heathens, you will never defeat the liberals, and apparently, you will not even put a significant dent in their war machine.

What percentage of Trump’s supporters passionately hate the liberals and all their works? To what extent does Trump hate the liberals? Trumps’ victory has already been nullified because the coalition of whites that voted for him do not hate liberalism, nor does Trump himself. Trump called for inclusion at his inauguration, but how can a man be married to hell? The liberals have created hell on earth; we cannot and we should not try to come to some kind of peaceful accord with them. Firstly, they don’t want a peaceful accord with us – they want to destroy us. And secondly, we should not seek redemption of the devil. Trump is a man of courage and has some of the old bred-in-the-bone Christianity, but he doesn’t have enough of it to defeat the liberals. A European of the old stock, a Walter Scott or an Edmund Burke, would see the liberals for what they are – the spawns of Satan. You can’t deal with them democratically as if they were human beings with normal human feelings and aspirations. They have left their humanity behind and moved onward, to become a sub-human species that must feed on the blood of whites in order to maintain their soulless existence. And why must they hate the white race? They must hate the white race because they hate Him, with an unremitting, relentless hatred that is fueled by Satan.

The liberals always win because there is no passion on the other side. The European clergymen have gone over to the liberals, the conservatives are all pragmatic pantheists, and the grazers follow their pathetic leaders who tell them that civilized men are never passionate about anything. They do not hate with a passion, nor do they love with a passion. They just stand waist-deep in the tepid waters of moderate liberalism, waiting to be drowned by a tidal wave of radical Jacobinism.

Personally, I would like Trump to resign, because I’ve become quite fond of him, and I don’t want to see him and his family tortured any longer. He has, ever since he won the nomination, been playing Gloucester to the Regans, Cornwalls, and Gonerils of Liberaldom. Just as Gloucester was tortured for his defense of King Lear, so is Trump being tortured for his refusal to accede to the extermination of the white race:

Regan. To whose hands have you sent the lunatic King?
     Speak.

Gloucester. I have a letter guessingly set down,
     Which came from one that’s of a neutral heart,
     And not from one oppos’d.

Cornwall. Cunning.

Regan. And false.

Cornwall. Where hast thou sent the King?

Gloucester. To Dover.

Regan. Wherefore to Dover? Wast thou not charg’d at peril-

Cornwall. Wherefore to Dover? Let him first answer that.

Gloucester. I am tied to th’ stake, and I must stand the course.

Regan. Wherefore to Dover, sir?

Gloucester. Because I would not see thy cruel nails
Pluck out his poor old eyes; nor thy fierce sister
In his anointed flesh stick boarish fangs.
The sea, with such a storm as his bare head
In hell-black night endur’d, would have buoy’d up
And quench’d the steeled fires.
Yet, poor old heart, he holp the heavens to rain.
If wolves had at thy gate howl’d that stern time,
Thou shouldst have said, ‘Good porter, turn the key.’
All cruels else subscrib’d. But I shall see
The winged vengeance overtake such children.

Cornwall. See’t shalt thou never. Fellows, hold the chair.
Upon these eyes of thine I’ll set my foot.

Gloucester. He that will think to live till he be old,
Give me some help!- O cruel! O ye gods!

Regan. One side will mock another. Th’ other too!

Cornwall. If you see vengeance-

1st Servant. Hold your hand, my lord!
I have serv’d you ever since I was a child;
But better service have I never done you
Than now to bid you hold.

Regan. How now, you dog?

1st Servant. If you did wear a beard upon your chin,
I’ld shake it on this quarrel.

Regan. What do you mean?

Cornwall. My villain! Draw and fight.

1st Servant. Nay, then, come on, and take the chance of anger.

Regan. Give me thy sword. A peasant stand up thus?

[She takes a sword and runs at him behind.]

1st Servant. O, I am slain! My lord, you have one eye left
To see some mischief on him. O! [He dies.]

Cornwall. Lest it see more, prevent it. Out, vile jelly!
Where is thy lustre now?

Gloucester. All dark and comfortless! Where’s my son Edmund?
Edmund, enkindle all the sparks of nature
To quit this horrid act.

Regan. Out, treacherous villain!
Thou call’st on him that hates thee. It was he
That made the overture of thy treasons to us;
Who is too good to pity thee.

Gloucester. O my follies! Then Edgar was abus’d.
Kind gods, forgive me that, and prosper him!

Regan. Go thrust him out at gates, and let him smell
His way to Dover.

                                     Exit [one] with Gloucester.

How is’t, my lord? How look you?

Cornwall. I have receiv’d a hurt. Follow me, lady.
Turn out that eyeless villain. Throw this slave
Upon the dunghill. Regan, I bleed apace.
Untimely comes this hurt. Give me your arm.

                                  Exit [Cornwall, led by Regan].

2nd Servant. I’ll never care what wickedness I do,
If this man come to good.

3rd Servant. If she live long,
And in the end meet the old course of death,
Women will all turn monsters.

2nd Servant. Let’s follow the old Earl, and get the bedlam
To lead him where he would. His roguish madness
Allows itself to anything.

3rd Servant. Go thou. I’ll fetch some flax and whites of eggs
To apply to his bleeding face. Now heaven help him!

King Lear

Yes, may heaven help him. He is facing traitors from within and the devil’s minions from without. All this without the support of a Christian people and without a full understanding of the extent of the evil forces arrayed against him. May Christ defend him and his family against the wickedness and snares of the devil and his minions. And if you ask me why I feel outraged by the treatment Trump is receiving, I will reply to you with the words of Burke: “It is natural that I should.” Should not any man with a heart that still lives feel drawn to a “still strong man in a blatant land” that fights alone against the forces of evil?(1)

I’ve often wondered why Burke’s critique of the spirit of Jacobinism was completely ignored in the West once Robespierre died. “Everything is fine now, and we can go on with the business of democratizing the world,” was the attitude of the intellectuals in the European nations. And in the 20th century when Burke’s heir, Antony Jacob, condemned democracy as the great enemy of the white man, he was ignored. There was no need to vilify Jacob, because Anthony Jacob didn’t have a parliamentary platform from which to speak. Go through the back files of “respectable” conservative journals such as the National Review and see if Anthony Jacob’s magnificent prophetic work White Man Think Again!is mentioned. It is not. Burke and Jacob were kith and kin Christian conservatives who rejected the democratic, racial universalism of the liberals. For this reason, the one was vilified and the other was ignored.

We can no longer ignore the kith and kin Christians of old Europe. Their passion is what is needed. We can’t “think” our way out of this democratic hell that the liberals have imposed on us. But we can love and hate with all our heart and fight our way out of this kingdom of Satan on earth. We must love Him and His people, the antique Europeans, and we must hate the liberals enough to fight as Alfred fought, as Forrest fought, and as Lee fought. Violence is not a magic panacea for every ill. But the conservatives and other democracy-loving white nationalists act like we have evolved beyond the need for violence. Only Gnostic men, who think we are all pure mind, can believe that. Human beings inhabit bodies. When we are combating the evil that liberals do we cannot just beat them in debates and think all is well. The prolifers always win the debate – of course the child in the womb is a human being and the right to the privacy is an invented right of the liberals. And of course white people should be accorded the right to live and rule in the nations that were created and sustained by them. But both the right to life of the unborn and of whites to rule in their own countries is categorically denied by the liberals despite the fact that reason and humanity are on the side of the unborn and the whites. What is our recourse? The liberals never shun violence, they will do whatever it takes to maintain their rule. So what is the white man to do? If you love much, you will fight to preserve your people and your faith. And a Christ-centered heart will keep your battle within the bounds of Christian chivalry. The liberals will not renounce violence, they will do whatever they deem necessary to destroy the white race. They are possessed by one passion, the hatred of the white, Christ-bearing race. If we refuse to match their hate for our people with our passionate love of our people, a love that inspires us to fight, then there is no hope for the white race, despite all our cleverness.

The new right and the old white nationalists, call them what you will, when they are not condemning Christians by treating them as Jews, are constantly telling them not to be so fussy about supporting white nationalist candidates. But it is not a question of supporting a white nationalist over a liberal – of course a Christian European should support a pagan white nationalist against a liberal. But the pagan white nationalist does not see the whole picture. If the European does not act in Christ’s name, he will not be able to defeat the liberals.

Christ’s name cannot be invoked with any success by those who do not believe in Him. We cannot judge a man’s eternal soul, we don’t know the reasons for his unbelief, but we must, if we are Christians, hold to the belief that no cause has any chance of success, nor does it deserve success if its champions do not go forth in His name. And it must be in His name, the Christ of the European hearth fire, not the universalist Christ of organized Christian Jewry or organized Churchianity which has become the Negroid-Moslem church of Satan. From whence comes the Promethean fire to defy the gods of Liberaldom if it does not come from Christ? Why did the Europeans once rule Europe and the colored nations? Was it because they played rationalist hopscotch better than the heathens? No, it was rationalism, devoid of faith, that destroyed the European people. A passionate connection to His passion is what made the European people the light of Europe and the world. You don’t win every battle because you invoke His name. Lee and Stonewall lost the war, for instance. But their people survived as a people until they ceased to invoke His name in the 1950s. We will only survive if our passion for our people and our Savior fills our heart. Without that passion we perish in the Descartian vortices of liberalism. +

_____________________________

(1) It is better that Trump resigns instead of remaining in office to be the target for liberal violence and libel. Every day he spends in office gives liberals the chance to show their power. They attack him and his family with impunity. The Federal law enforcement officials do not go after any of the vermin who encourage people to assassinate Trump, while the vanguard of Satan’s armies, the media, spew out their hatred of Trump every minute of their fake news broadcasts. Where is the spiritual reciprocity? Why is there no white passion to match the liberals’ passionate hatred? Ask not for whom the bell tolls. The attack on Trump is an attack on thee and me as well as on Trump. The liberals have rejected the love of God, which comes to those who are humble enough to receive that love at the European hearth fire. So we must make them know the wrath of God that will come to them through the Europeans who still cherish the God and the people of the European hearth fire.

Addendum: Trump’s courage was on display at the press conference, but the great weakness of the white people of the United States and throughout the world was also on display. It is always a given that we must help the blacks, yet it is always a given that we must not help them as the white Southerners of the pre-Civil War South helped them – by controlling their baser instincts and teaching them to conform, at least outwardly, to the ethos of Christianity. Is it really white people’s fault that blacks murder, rape, and pillage their own people as well as white people? Trump said he is not a racist. No, he is not. And that is his Achilles’ heel and the Achilles’ heel of the European people. If you don’t love your own people above all others you will not have the heart to extend some of that love to the stranger. The only people who ever helped the blacks were white “racists.” We should never lose sight of the fact that the liberals use the word ‘racist’ to destroy white pietas. Nothing good will ever happen to the white race until white people love their own above all others without apology and without the fear of being called racists.

Posted in Blood faith, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Jacobinism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The End of Democracy Is the New Dawn of Europe

The Higher Law

Posted on February 11, 2017 by cwny

We must fall back on Christianity, which embraces man’s whole nature, and though not a code of philosophy, is something better; for it proposes to lead us through the trials and intricacies of life, not by the mere cool calculations of the head, but by the unerring instincts of a pure and regenerate heart. The problem of the Moral World is too vast and complex for the human mind to comprehend; yet the pure heart will, safely and quietly, feel its way through the mazes that confound the head. 

-George Fitzhugh, Cannibals All! Or Slaves Without Masters

__________

Shane tells young Bob Starrett that, “A gun is just a tool. No better and no worse than any other tool, a shovel – or an axe or a saddle or a stove or anything. Think of it always that way. A gun is as good – and as bad – as the man who carries it. Remember that.” So it is with sport. If it is used, as in Tom Brown’s Schooldays, as a means of teaching young men the code of chivalry, it is a beneficial activity. There was a great deal of truth in the English assertion that, “The battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton.” But if sport is used as a means of teaching young men, and society at large, the doctrines of liberalism it ceases to be beneficial: it becomes evil.

I’ve known Catholic Jansensists and Protestant Cromwellians who thought sports were intrinsically evil. And I’ve known good solid American conservatives who thought organized sports were the solution to every evil under the sun. Obviously both groups needed a strong dose of Shane: “Sport is as good or bad as the people who organize and control it.”

In the late 1950s and through the 1960s, the liberals derided sports because they felt that participation in sports tended to make the participants into reactionaries who were unfit to take their place in a progressive society. Coaches said prayers before games when prayers were banned in the more progressive classrooms, and sport clichés that enjoined young men to be strong and resolute in the face of adversary, which went against the ethos of Liberaldom, were in constant use. I remember a very liberal high school English teacher (I didn’t know what a liberal was at that time of my life) telling me that I was demeaning myself and wasting my “gifts” by participating in sports. But in the 1970s, the liberals, under Satan’s guidance, began to change their position vis-à-vis organized sports. They did to sports what they had already done to the churches. Instead of abolishing sporting activities they turned them into vehicles for liberalism. This certainly did not start in the 1970s. The South integrated their Little League teams in the 1950s, and professional baseball integrated in 1947, but the wholesale use of sport for the spread of liberalism commenced when the liberals consolidated their power over every aspect of society including sporting events. Now sodomy awareness days, Mexican awareness days, black awareness days – everything but white awareness days – are celebrated at the various sporting events. Organized sport in America and throughout the European world is a blasphemous mix of paganism and liberalism.

I no longer watch sporting events, because I regard them as liberal religious festivals, but I am always glad to hear about a white athlete such as Mike Trout, Tom Brady, or Fedor Emelianenko who does well. How do I justify such a contradiction? By referencing Fitzhugh’s observation about the Christian heart guiding us through the trials and intricacies of life. I home schooled my children and gave them white heroes, such as Wallace, Havelock, Forrest, Lee, Alfred, Walter Scott, Lou Gehrig, and Bob Mathias to look up to. But what do white children who are not home schooled have? To whom do they look to for heroic examples? They have nothing. They are taught to worship black athletes and liberals who paved the way for “diversity.” The self-esteem of the young white male is at the lowest possible level; he does not feel that he deserves to live. My heart goes out to such white children. I wish I could tell them of their heroic past, a past that would inspire them to become like unto the heroes of Christian Europe. But I don’t have access to those suffering white children, so how can I not hope that they will at least find some solace, some hope, from a white athlete who is successful in the pagan-liberal arena? I liken this to a Christian living in the catacombs who finds it heartening to hear that one of his Christian brethren wrenched a spear from a Roman soldier and slew a lion that was about to attack his fellow Christians in the arena. The event itself was evil, but the Christian’s heroism was heartening. Of course the modern white athlete is not forced, as the catacomb Christian was, to participate in the liberal pagan spectacles, but is not the modern white athlete a spiritually crippled young man? To what extent can I blame him for competing in the only available market for his talents? By the same token I wish that young white American soldiers would not fight in the liberals’ wars, but I don’t want any harm to come to the misguided white boys who fight those wars. Is there a contradiction there? Ask your heart.

What is happening in the sporting events is a mirror image of the larger arena of politics. In sports the liberals will permit some whites to participate providing that they support “diversity” and providing that they only occupy supporting roles for the athletes of color. Any white athlete who obtains prominence in his field is vilified. And if, as in the cases of Curt Schilling and Tom Brady, they express conservative political views, they are demonized. The only reason white athletes are not banned from all sporting events is because most white athletes keep to the liberals’ code of conduct and do not express views contrary to liberalism. Tom Brady was suspended because he was not adhering to the liberals’ code of conduct, and Curt Schilling was fired and denied access to the Hall of Fame because he also violated the liberals’ code of conduct by denouncing transgender bathrooms and professing a belief in Jesus Christ.

When we turn to that other arena, the larger political arena, we see the same liberal rules in place. Whites can participate in politics, but they must support liberalism. They can only hold office if they do not say or do anything that runs counter to liberal orthodoxy. McCain and Romney were allowed to run for election and lose, because they did not offend liberal orthodoxy. The only reason Trump got into office was because the liberals, with arrogant self-confidence, did not think he had a chance to win. When he won, the liberals nullified the democratic process and set out to destroy Trump by whatever means necessary. After all, he has broken the rules, he has not called for the extermination of the white race, which always has been and always will be the ultimate goal of the liberals.

Just as the victory of a Trump-supporting white coach and white quarterback will not change the essential white-hating, negro-worshiping nature of American athletics, neither will the electoral victory of Trump change the essential white-hating, negro-worshiping nature of the United States. The liberals will not allow a glitch in the system to destroy their system. When Obama won, he was given dictatorial powers by the other liberal branches of the government. He was never required to make his Executive Orders comply with the Constitution or to comply with common human decency. In contrast, now that Trump is President the judges disregard Executive Orders that are constitutionally proper and morally necessary for the defense of the nation. If Trump, as President, cannot issue an order to restrict dangerous aliens from entering the United States, how can he protect and defend the United States? He can’t. And of course the liberals do not want him to protect the United States, because the liberals do not believe in a United States composed of white Europeans. They believe in a multi-racial nation, dedicated to the extermination of the white race.

The Trump victory highlights the great divide between white Europeans and the liberals who have denounced their whiteness and given their heart and soul to Satan. The two groups of people are from different worlds. Paper and ink democracy cannot bind such divergent peoples together into a nation. How can whites find common cause with a brood of anti-white and anti-Christian creatures from hell whose vision of peace is one mass grave with “Here lies the white race” engraved on the headstone?

Mere conservation is useless — actually it is worse than useless if its sole purpose is not the preservation of the European people and the faith that bound them together as a people. What do I care if there are less taxes levied in a nation that has purged my people and my God from its midst? That is all the “conservatives” stand for – less taxes. Trump was vilified during the campaign and is being demonized now that he has become President, because he has said things – and his actions have coincided with his rhetoric – that indicate he has some antique notions of faith and race mixed in with his Americanism. Hence he is an anathema. Why have German, Irish, and a whole international cabal of European politicians called for Trump’s assassination? Obviously, because they do not want the slightest tiny ripple of white pietas to surface anywhere in the European world, because if white pietas becomes commonplace the reign of the liberals and the colored barbarians will come to an end.

Irvin Cobb, the author of the Judge Priest stories set in the post-Civil War South, stated in his autobiography that the Gospel of Christ was a very sublime book, but anyone who based his life on the Gospel would be run aground on the rocks of reality. Cobb was not a Jacobin – he admired his people and always spoke well of those who fought in the War for Southern Independence, but like all modern conservatives, he did not want to conserve his people and their sacred heritage. His people, who did not separate what was “realistic” from what was good, felt honor-bound to defend their Christian heritage whether it seemed practical or not. And ultimately, is it practical to lose your soul to gain the whole world?

Democratic solutions to the liberal-sponsored onslaught of the Moslem and colored heathens are not practical, because they do not reach the soul of the European, they do not stir his heart and make him feel honor-bound to defend his people. As Burke tells us, we can’t become attached to a description of a square measurement or feel pride in being one statistic in an inhuman aggregate. But if the Christ-centered heart of the European is stirred, he will rise and ride in defense of his people. Then, instead of trying to vote the aliens out of his nation he will drive them out of his nation by whatever means that are necessary. Without the honor code that comes from a Christ-centered heart, what the old Europeans called chivalry, there will be no European restoration. (1) The white athlete who competes in the liberals’ religious festivals and the white politician who tries to change liberalism from within will not be able to do any lasting damage to the liberal juggernaut. Only Europeans, acting as the impractical, unrealistic Europeans of the past acted, can turn the tide of battle and defeat the liberals. The foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of men. We need more Third Dumb Brothers who are grounded in the Europeans’ vision of Christ rather than the conservatives’ vision of an ever-changing, ever-evolving conservatism that is always slightly to the right of the mad-dog liberals, but is forever opposed to the European people.

The only good that has come out of Trump’s election is that the liberals have made it clear to all but the willfully blind that modern democracy means death for the European people. Now that it has become clear there is no need for politics as usual. There is no need for useless pro-life movements, for passionate pleas to the liberals to respect life in the womb, because nothing but fear for their own miserable lives will make liberals stop murdering the innocents. And there is no need to look for white candidates who will protect the rights of white people – such candidates will be ground up in the satanic mills of Liberaldom and be forced to abandon all their attempts to stop the ongoing Moslem, Mexican, and African invasions.

It’s not last post for white people unless they remain nonviolent and democratic. The liberals and the colored heathen will not stop the slaughter of whites because of an electoral loss or any type of plea for mercy from white people. Both the liberals and the colored heathen are devoid of mercy. What is left to do? An enemy that has no mercy must be made to fear his intended victims. The sheep must become, in the name of mercy, just as fierce as the wolves. No war is more just, no war is more necessary, than the war we must fight against the satanic liberals and their heathen allies. That charity of honor, bequeathed to us by the antique Europeans, is worth more than all the kingdoms of this world. It is the only thing worth fighting for.

I don’t believe that the European people will remain as sheep to the colored wolves and grist for the liberals’ satanic mills forever, but I have no concrete evidence that I can point to in order to substantiate my hope. Still, St. Paul’s words that Handel placed at the center of the Messiah are burned into my soul: “In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump; for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.” Surely, if we do not forsake Christ, He can change our dead civilization into His Europe once again. +

________________________________________________

(1) Before Trump’s election many anti-immigration whites were saying that if Trump was not elected we were doomed. Well, Trump has been elected and we are still doomed. Not because Trump is not keeping his promises, but because you cannot expect fair play form Satanists. The liberals shout “the rule of law,” when it suits their purpose. And since they own the courts, they almost always shout, “the rule of law.” But whenever the rule of law does not suit their purpose they defy the law in the name of a higher law. Why do Europeans never oppose the liberals’ law in the name of a higher law? This respect for the law, independent of whether the law stems from our Christian-European traditions or from the Jacobin-Marxist traditions of the liberals, is not just a sickness of the European Americans. It is a sickness that has taken hold of all the European people throughout the world. Is it a sickness unto death? Of course it is, if we do not look to the past and see what they saw – the Star of Bethlehem shining above provincial Europe.

Posted in Democracy, Muscular Christianity, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Higher Law

Of Kingship and Kinship

Posted on February 3, 2017 by cwny

Nothing can be conceived more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician. It comes nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man. It is like that of the principle of evil himself, incorporeal, pure, unmixed, dephlegmated, defecated evil. – Edmund Burke

_____

No man ever was attached by a sense of pride, partiality, or real affection, to a description of square measurement. He never will glory in belonging to the Chequer No. 71, or to any other badge-ticket. We begin our public affections in our families. No cold relation is a zealous citizen. We pass on to our neighbourhoods, and our habitual provincial connexions. These are inns and resting-places. Such divisions of our country as have been formed by habit, and not by a sudden jerk of authority, were so many little images of the great country in which the heart found something which it could fill. The love to the whole is not extinguished by this subordinate partiality. – Reflections on the French Revolution

__________

If a man is traveling on Bunyan’s path toward the city of God, and he meets a man at the halfway point of the journey traveling in the opposite direction, it might appear to the casual observer that both men are at the same point of their life’s journey. But the casual observer would be mistaken. The man heading toward the city of God has something within, something in his heart that compels him to seek the light. The other man has something in his head that compels him to flee from the light and seek… he knows not what he seeks. But if he doesn’t turn around, he will enter Satan’s kingdom.

While waiting in line at the supermarket this weekend, I intervened in a debate between a pro-Trump clerk and an anti-Trump, Pope Francis-style Roman Catholic customer. I used the Bunyan analogy to make the case for Trump’s Christianity over Pope Francis’s Christianity. In point of fact I don’t think Pope Francis is at the halfway point, I think he has almost completed his journey toward the liberals’ kingdom of hell on earth, but there is a limit to the nuances I can come up with in a supermarket debate. It would be more accurate to place the Israel-worshiping evangelicals at the halfway point of a journey away from the heavenly city. But the evangelicals were not the subjects of the debate — the antagonist who was attacking Trump for his lack of Christian virtues was from a Roman Catholic background. When in Rome…

Let’s state what should be obvious to anyone who has any European blood left in him: Trump, despite being an unoriginal sinner, like all of us, has that within which makes him a better man and a better Christian than all his pseudo-Christian critics, such as Pope Francis, and all his post-Christian, Marxist enemies, who are legion. Trump has pietàs, which always has led and always will lead a man towards the kingdom of God, because that kingdom is a provincial village that can only be entered through the human heart.

The Israelite evangelicals have a certain nostalgia for the Christian European village, but they have turned their backs on that village because they fear the condemnation of the liberals. To love your own people, if you are a white man, has been deemed racist by the powers of this world, and the evangelicals lack the moral courage to defy the world. The Christ-hating Pope Francis-type of Christian is quite different from the evangelicals. He has no nostalgia for the provincial Christian village. He yearns for the liberals’ kingdom of Satan on earth. But he must keep one toe in the old Christian world so he can use Christian words and Christian symbols to support the kingdom of Satan on earth. For how long must we allow such individuals as Pope Francis and his liberal allies to use words like charity to buttress up a liberal power elite that has not charity? Liberalism is from the devil. Is that not crystal clear? The liberals not only hate white people, they hate all people as individuals. They love the Moslem, Mexican, and black hordes because such aggregates represent the inhuman, impersonal forces of Satan. The satanic liberals use such inhuman aggregates to attack all that is personal and human – the European people who are struggling toward the light. Lincoln claimed that the American Civil War was about the survival of an utopian democratic system. He was right about that. But he was wrong to think that the survival of that system was desirable. What was and still is at stake in this ongoing European civil war is the question of ‘Can the European people who made an incorporate league with Jesus Christ survive as the Christ-bearing people, or will the liberals manage to totally efface the image of God in man from the face of the earth?’

Trump is a man of European blood. He is still tainted with too much Americanism, but his heart is a European heart, and to have a leader with a European heart is not a little thing.

Ah God, for a man with heart, head, hand,      
Like some of the simple great ones gone                     
For ever and ever by,    
One still strong man in a blatant land,    
Whatever they call him, what care I,      
Aristocrat, democrat, autocrat—one     
Who can rule and dare not lie.

-Tennyson

Will Trump succeed? No, he will not succeed in democratically turning the Satanism of the liberals into something other than Satanism. But he has already succeeded in the spiritual realm. He has hurled one European javelin at the liberal leviathan. That’s all any man can do. If there are still men with European hearts left, other javelins will pierce the leviathan, and eventually the leviathan will be destroyed. This war, of the Christian Europeans against Satan and his minions, will not be settled through the democratic process. The liberals have already shown us that. They only believe in democracy when it serves their ends. How could it be otherwise? Is Satan committed to the rule of law and the well-being of mankind? No, he is committed to the destruction of mankind, which is why he is committed to democracy – it serves his purpose. The riots and the violence against white people that have come in the wake of Trump’s victory are part of the democratic process. George Soros and the other Satanists such as McCain, Lindsey Graham, Wolf Blitzer, and the legions of depraved scum in Hollywood would not be permitted to live in a non-democratic (that is, a non-satanic) state. That is the burden Trump is carrying. He has the task of fighting Satan while he is still bound to the Promethean rock of Satan’s democratic system. The liberal vultures are picking at his entrails while he must fight them off without the aid that a liberal office-holder would receive from the powers of this world only.

It’s quite fitting that the first small blow against the liberal leviathan should be struck by a European American, because America was the first anti-Christian, utopian state founded by Europeans. Our religiously neutral state, which translates to an anti-Christian state, preceded Jacobin France. Our civil war was a heroic attempt by the Southern half of our anti-nation to return to Christian Europe. Now we, the European people, are witnessing wars of extermination in every white nation. The white South Africans are being exterminated by the liberal-sponsored, black government. Britain has fallen before the Moslem armies, and so has France and the Scandinavian countries. The biggest surprise to me has been Germany. I never thought Germany would be the first nation of Europe to become an Islamic state. But then I suppose of all the white nations, the Germans have been the most hated by the liberals. Are they not the most evil nation in the history of the world? The American media tells us so on a daily basis. But there is still eternal Germany, just as there is eternal Europe. Look to that Germany, to His Germany, and to His Europe. Our Apostle, St. Paul, tells us over and over again that we will not be saved by a religious system or by a state system, we will be saved by Christ who comes to those men and women who have circumcised their hearts. If it is true that charity never faileth, can we not hope that white German hearts, white South African hearts, and all the European people who have not hardened their hearts against their own people will ultimately triumph against the liberals, the Moslems, and the barbarian hordes of color?

Let’s separate what was good in Trump’s victory, good for all people of European descent, from what was part of the democratic heresy. What was good was not all the universalist rhetoric about all Americans bleeding the same blood of patriotism. Such pap is from the men of the Enlightenment, it does not come from Christian men. The good in Trump’s victory stems from an ancient source, a wellspring that has almost run dry for lack of use. That wellspring is the European peoples’ sense of kinship. There was something underneath all the democratic blather during Trump’s campaign for election to the presidency. A sizeable amount of his white supporters had wise blood; they were not looking to the democratic process to aid them against the wickedness of the liberals, they were looking for an ancient king – “One still strong man in a blatant land…” The Christian king is the great defender of his people, not the democratic herd, but his kith and kin. The great exemplars of the Christian king were Alfred, the king of Britain, and Nathan Bedford Forrest, the uncrowned king of the white Southern people.

The liberals are right about Trump. He does represent a threat to their reign. But he does not represent a democratic threat; they can easily turn all his legislative gambits into watered-down mush. (1) But the spirit of kinship that he awakened in some white people who we thought were dead, is not something that can be as easily put down as a piece of legislation. It’s a long, arduous pilgrimage to Bunyan’s city of God. But there is only one road to that city for all of us, we Europeans. The European hearth fire, where our kith and kin dwell, will sustain us in our journey toward the light. In every European nation we must, in the battle against the liberals and the colored barbarians, “Incline unto the King,” the man who loves his own in imitation of the one true King of Europe who loves with a love that passeth the understanding of the liberals, whose hearts have hardened against their own people. It’s time for the European people to fight for their kith and kin, not for the false universalisms that have been created by Satanists to destroy the Christ-bearing race. +

_____________________

(1) Already, judges are refusing to honor Trump’s travel restrictions on Moslems, and civil rights’ lawyers are suing the government for discrimination against Moslems. No liberals or third world heathens will ever be concerned about discrimination against whites, which is why white people should discriminate against liberals and heathens.

Whites should step away from the democratic system, which was conceived in Satanism and dedicated to the proposition that all whites are inherently evil, and return to a Europe in which liberals are pariahs, with no place in society. And the colored heathens should be sent to live in the non-European lands where they can practice their barbarities on each other or convert to the white man’s faith and stop practicing their barbarities on each other. Either way, they do not belong in Europe. What can possibly be wrong with making the European nations into white nations? Only a Satanist or a colored heathen would oppose such a humane proposal. But of course that is the problem. The European nations are run by inhumane liberals who want to destroy the white race by making white nations into colored hell holes.

The liberals have made it clear that they do not want to live in peace with white people. Every other word out of their liberal mouths is a call for Trump’s assassination. Whites should let liberals know that we will not remain peaceful if anything happens to Trump or his family. All liberals will be held accountable. We will “Cry Havoc, and let slip the dogs of war!”

Posted in Christ the Hero, Easter, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on Of Kingship and Kinship

Worse than War

Posted on January 28, 2017 by cwny

It was not long ere it made its way,—    
  A thrilling, ceaseless sound:     
It was no noise from the strife afar,        
  Or the sappers under ground.         

It was the pipes of the Highlanders!       
  And now they played Auld Lang Syne; 
It came to our men like the voice of God,            
  And they shouted along the line.

__________

The un-United States of America lost the war in Vietnam because the ruling elite in America sought to oppose the satanic Jacobinism of the communists with their own brand of Jacobinism – democratic capitalism. Even if the United States had won the war what would they have won? They would have won a war for Satan, because Satan was fighting for both sides. And in most cases the more overtly satanic cause wins in a clash between two Satanisms, because the more overtly satanic power is not divided between mad-dog liberals and lukewarm liberals, as was the case with the United States in the Vietnam War.

If the Trump coalition stays in the lukewarm waters of moderate liberalism they will be defeated by the mad-dog liberals. And they will be defeated very quickly because there is a demonic energy to full-blown Jacobinism that can only be stopped by full-blooded, integral Christian Europeans. Neo-pagans, moderate liberals, and intellectual Christians cannot defeat satanic, Jacobin liberalism.

Trump’s victory was made possible by a coalition of moderate liberals, neo-pagans, and intellectual Christians. But his victory will be a defeat if it is not used as a stepping stone to Christian Europe, which is the only ground upon which the European people can take their stand. Right now Trump and his supporters are standing on the shifting sand of liberalism, which will always leave the Europeans in desperate straits.

Trump’s seemingly firm stand against the mad-dog liberals is really a weak stance in the middle of quicksand, because it is not possible to seek redemption from the devil. In the name of liberalism, Trump demands that white people be given part of the liberal pie, but the liberals will never allow that, since the essence of liberalism is the destruction of the white race. The completely insane, hysterical, and often violent reactions to Trump’s moderate liberal agenda, an agenda that no Democrat of the 50s or early 60s would have opposed, gives us a horrific view of the pure, unadulterated Satanism of the liberals. Can Trump’s moderate liberalism stop the Moslem or the Mexican invasion? Can a man who honors Martin Luther King Jr. and wants to win the blacks over by the promise of economic enfranchisement put a dent in the anti-Christian state religion of negro worship? ‘Of course not,’ is the answer to all of those questions. Then, of what use is Trump’s victory? It will be a great victory if white people use Trump’s victory as a stepping stone to an even greater victory, the restoration of a Christian Europe that is not under the yoke of Jacobinism and its attendant worship of the savage hordes of color. Do I see such a change coming over the European people? No, I don’t. But what is a faith that can be seen? I do know of certain individuals who have been driven back to Christian Europe because of the demonism of the anti-Trump, mad-dog liberals. For instance, a friend of mine, who has been held captive for years by Churchianity, rolled down her car window and screamed at some Roman Catholic nuns who were lining the highway with signs declaring that they rejected Trump’s ‘Islamophobia’ – “I reject you!” Such spiritual breakthroughs need to occur in the millions, but miracles have happened in the past, and they can happen again.

Contrary to what the Jews, the Mormons, and various heretical ‘Christian’ sects claim, the age of prophecy ended with the coming of Christ. But the age of Christian Europeans who see with blinding sight is never over. Who are the men with blinding sight? They are men who look at the history of their own times from the perspective of a Christian heart. And from that perspective they tell us what will befall us if we depart from the faith of our ancestors. Dostoyevsky was a man with blinding sight. And before Dostoyevsky there was Edmund Burke. It was Burke who exposed, for all those who had eyes to see, the satanic core of Jacobinism. He also told us that the breeding ground of Jacobinism was intellectual Christianity. And once bred, the Jacobin heresy was diffused throughout the lifeblood of a nation by Christ-hating liberals who wanted to efface the image of God in man.

It was Burke’s great sorrow — a sorrow he took to the grave with him — that the European people never responded to Jacobinism as integral Christian Europeans. They did not see Jacobinism as satanic, because their Christian instincts had been blunted by years of intellectual Christianity. All but the mad-dog liberals such as Price, Priestly, and Belloc rejected Robespierre’s Jacobinism, but the European people only went back a step to moderate, democratic Jacobinism. They were content to scotch the snake rather than kill it. And that Jacobin snake has reared up again in all its satanic fury in the 20th and 21st centuries. The Trump movement in the United States, the Le Pen movement in France, the Brexit movement in Britain, and all other European movements of similar nature are scotch-the-snake movements. They are not movements to kill the snake. And if you don’t kill the Jacobin snake, it will eventually kill you.

My favorite television show is the Leave it to Beaver show that aired in the late 1950s through the early 1960s. No show has been more popular in reruns over the years, and no show has received such unremitting hatred from the liberals over the years. Why the continued popularity and why the hatred? The continued popularity of the show is because we are allowed to see the story of a white, middle-class family through the eyes of two white boys. And the story is told with heart and humor. The hatred of the show stems from the same reason for the show’s popularity – there are no Moslems, Mexicans, or negroes in the Leave it to Beaver world. There are only white people. And that type of world, in the eyes of the liberal Jacobins, is evil. The liberals claim Trump wants to go back to the world of Leave it to Beaver. More’s the pity – he doesn’t want to go back to that world. But he does claim that whites of the Leave it to Beaver mold should not be eradicated from the face of the earth. That such a compromise fills the liberals with fury should tell us all we need to know about the liberals. They are satanic and cannot be defeated by moderate liberalism, they can only be defeated by Christians who take the vow: “To the knife.” (1)

The Cleaver family, like so many white families of that time period, were living on borrowed time. They were living on the fumes of Christianity. I’m sure Ward and June Cleaver believed, like all good 1950s’ liberals, in racial equality and religious universalism. But they only had to believe in theory; they did not have to face the consequences of their moderate liberal beliefs. The whites of the Leave it to Beaver world were like a cancer victim at the beginning of his disease. He feels fine because the cancer has not started to spread. But once it does spread, it is not possible to go back and have just a little bit of cancer; he must eradicate the cancer or he will die. I would settle for that Leave it to Beaver world, because I really don’t want to fight “to the knife.” But there is a God and there is a devil. And the devil will not allow whites to stop at the top of the slippery slope. He requires that they descend all the way down to hell. The liberals have made that descent already, and they will drag us down to their level if we don’t put on the whole armor of Christ and fight them. As unpleasant as “to the knife” seems, it is nowhere near as unpleasant a prospect as standing by while Satan and his minions destroy our people and mock our God. And it is the love of our people and our God that should give us the hate to “fight to the knife.” If you are too lukewarm to be moved by the murder of innocence, the vilification of everything decent and good from old Europe, and the unremitting assault on whites coming from the liberals and the colored barbarians, then you have become an Undine, you have lost your soul.

The most striking thing about the modern liberals is that so many of them no longer feel any need to disguise their demonism. That Democratic subhuman white woman from Idaho who said, before an applauding black and white audience, that her mission was to make white people shut up is the demonic face of naked liberalism. The liberals want white blood. Why? It goes back to what St. Paul said about Christians bearing the death of Jesus Christ in their bodies and the life of Jesus Christ in their bodies. The liberals don’t believe in the life of Jesus Christ, but they do believe in His death. And by destroying the people who have His death in their bodies, the liberals think they have destroyed death. In point of fact, the liberals are death incarnate. What else can we call a people who, with malice aforethought, have built an earthly kingdom of Satan in which there is no love, no honor, and no light?

It may be that whites, as a people, cannot come home. After years and years of liberal propaganda in church and state, they might truly believe that original sin exists only in the white race and that whites must atone for that sin by freely offering up the blood of other whites – it is always the other whites – to the avenging gods of color. But are the colored gods of the liberals our gods, or do we believe in the one true God? And if we do believe in the one true God, are we not supposed to love our neighbor as ourselves? And who is our neighbor if it is not our people, the people who have the death and the life of Jesus Christ in their bodies? Who shall separate us from the love of Christ, who comes to us through our racial hearth fire? Certainly not the colored barbarians, and certainly not the liberals. Let us call Trump’s victory and all such European victories stepping stone victories. We shall step form Satan’s kingdom to His Europe. (2)

War is a terrible thing. But there is something worse than war. To stand by and watch the massacre of your people — that is worse than war. Right now the European people are trapped in Lucknow with no rescue in sight. I look to the day, I believe in the day, when we few, we happy few, shall take the vow, “to the knife,” and our people will hear the pipes play “Auld Lang Syne.” The last word in the European drama belongs to our Lord and His people who serve Him. It does not belong to the children of Satan – the liberals and the colored barbarians.

And they wept, and shook one another’s hands,                     
  And the women sobbed in a crowd;     
And every one knelt down where he stood,      
  And we all thanked God aloud.               

That happy day, when we welcomed them,       
  Our men put Jessie first;                     
And the general gave her his hand, and cheers 
  Like a storm from the soldiers burst.    

And the pipers’ ribbons and tartan streamed,   
  Marching round and round our line;     
And our joyful cheers were broken with tears,         
  As the pipes played Auld Lang Syne. +

_______________________________________

(1) Is it possible to live peacefully with liberals who, when they lose an election to a moderate liberal who does not want white people exterminated, call for the winning candidate’s assassination? Then, when that candidate takes office, they send death threats to Kelly Anne Conway and refuse to interview her because she bested them in every debate during the campaign. And let us never overlook, in the case of Mrs. Conway, the added source of the liberals’ ire. Mrs. Conway is better looking than the females on the mad-dog liberal side of the battle field. Despite the liberals’ claim to have achieved a higher plane of existence, beyond jealousy and malice, we note that they have gone down to the lowest plane of existence, they have descended to the level of the demon-possessed swine. Again, I ask, is it possible to deal peacefully with such creatures?

(2) By calling Trump’s victory a stepping stone victory, I in no way mean to disparage or belittle Donald Trump. He is a courageous and decent man, who has already done more for white people than any U. S. president in the last 100 years. But I still insist that we must put on the whole armor of Christ, because the liberals have put on the whole armor of Satan. Their reactions to Trump’s reasonable and necessary measures as regards the Moslems, the Mexicans, and the economy are proof, as if we needed any more proof, of the liberals’ demonism.

Posted in Jacobinism, Muscular Christianity, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Tagged , | Comments Off on Worse than War

Our Fathers’ Europe

Posted on January 21, 2017 by cwny

And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

– St. Paul, 2 Corinthians 6: 15

__________

When Pilate put the issue of Christ or Barabbas to a vote, it did not turn out well for Christ: “Let him be crucified.” People of the same race and the same faith can vote on minor issues, but people of different races and different faiths cannot settle their differences through the democratic process. The result will always be the same: truth will be crucified. Liberals who worship Satan cannot get along democratically with Christian-Europeans. Nor can white people live in a society in which the colored barbarians have the vote.

In my late teens I lost the Christian faith of my childhood, like so many of the lost children of the sixties. When I returned to that faith in my mid-twenties, I returned with an abhorrence for liberalism in all its many guises. Which is why I was horrified to discover that the conservatives were not conservative. The National Review conservatives were only less liberal than the liberals; they had no spiritual foundation that compelled them to stand and never yield. Instead they were content to stay just to the right of liberalism. But since liberalism is always moving ever leftward toward the kingdom of Satan on earth, conservatism, in a democratic system, will always be moving leftward. The Trump phenomenon illustrates this point. His policies are very similar to John F. Kennedy’s policies, and Kennedy was considered a liberal in 1960. Yet both the National Review conservatives and the mainstream, mad-dog liberals oppose Trump because he is too “far-right.”

The conservatives and the liberals claim to be progressive. Toward what are they progressing? I think that has become crystal clear. They are progressing towards hell, and their pace has accelerated at such a rapid rate that we can no longer say the liberals and the conservatives are progressing toward hell – it would be more accurate to say that they have arrived and are now trying to fend off any opposition to their kingdom. Trump’s electoral victory represented an attempt to go back a few stops along the liberals’ track to hell, which is why the liberals are trying to derail him. But if you go a few stops back on the railway to hell, have you really won a great victory? The demonic liberals will scream bloody murder at Trump’s inauguration because they must preserve and extend their kingdom of Satan on earth, but no man of European blood should be deceived. We have won nothing if we rely on the democratic process to save us from the scourge of liberalism. The democratic process was invented by Satan to crucify Christ and the Christ-bearing people. (1)

There are movements throughout the European nations similar to the Trump movement in the United States, but even if they succeed, the European people are still facing extinction unless they recapture the living faith of the antique Europeans. I recently read a rant by a more conservative Italian bishop who was castigating his people for their decadence, for their low birth rate, for their indifference to the Islamic invasion, for their promiscuous lifestyles, etc. What he said about the Italians was all true, and it is also true of all the European people, but the Italian bishop did not get to the heart of the matter. You cannot emasculate a man and then blame him for no longer acting like a man. The churches have been peddling an emasculated, intellectual Christianity for centuries, and the result of their propaganda is before our eyes. The European people are naked to their enemies; they do not have a living faith with which to oppose the demonically possessed, techno-barbarian liberals or the demonically possessed Moslems and the barbarians of color. What do the Europeans treasure? Where are their hearts? So long as their hearts remain in limbo, they will be defenseless against the liberal pestilence that walketh in darkness and the colored barbarians and heathens that wasteth at noonday.

This past weekend I got a chance to see a series of vignettes filmed of the Scottish Highlands, the Lake District of England, Stratford-on-Avon, London by the Thames, and Amsterdam. All of the vignettes were filmed in the early 1950s, and marvel of marvel, there were no blacks, Moslems, or any other creatures of color in those documentaries. All the people were white! It is now a liberal given that such non-diverse societies are evil, but why are they evil? To me they are another name for heaven. Think of the children in those vignettes. What have they seen in their lifetimes? Did they become liberals and help destroy the white villages and cities that they grew up in? Or did they become grazers who were too spiritually anesthetized to oppose demonic diversity so long as it was endorsed by the clergy and came under the guise of democracy?

There is a children’s book called The Little House by Virginia Lee Burton, which is about a pleasant little house in the country. We see over the course of many years how the house gradually becomes part of the city. At the end of the story, the descendants of the first owners of the little house discover the house and have it transported back to the country. So, there is a happy ending to the story. But it will not be the same for the European people. Those whites who live rural and are still relatively untouched by the barbarian invasion cannot remain untouched by the invasion any more than the nobleman in Poe’s story could avoid the Red Death. The pestilence that is in our cities will spread. White people must do more than vote to restrict alien immigration, they must drive the heathen from their lands. In order to do that they need to have faith in the living God, not in the democratic process or in the church of organized, intellectual Christianity, which is the same as organized Satanism.

The people of Europe are currently failing a test that the American European people have already failed. They have failed to respond to the rape of their women and the murder of their children by heathens. With the Europeans it is the Moslems, and with the white Americans it is the negro. There seems to be no limit to what the Europeans on the continent will endure at the hands of the Moslem barbarians rather than fight. And there seems to be no end in sight to negro worship in the United States. If the Europeans had not swallowed democracy and its fruits – legalized abortion and race-mixing – they would not have been too spiritually emasculated to oppose Islam and black savagery. But the Europeans have accepted the main premises of modern democracy, and as a result nothing good will happen to them as a people, until democracy is rejected.

The United States has always been at the forefront of anti-Europeanism. The American conservatives, who are liberals, never talk about the radicalism of our founding fathers and the Constitution they wrote, but our forefathers were radicals and the Constitution is a radical document. The wrap-themselves-up-in-the-Constitution conservatives, such as Glenn Beck, are just as radical as the Hillary Clinton liberals. It’s no surprise that Beck ended up endorsing Hillary, because a man who worships the Constitution is a propositional man who will wrap negro worship and the worship of Israel into the Constitution and call it the Holy Grail. The liberal, Bill Bradley, once claimed that the essence of America was that Americans refused to accept the tragic nature of life. Yes! That is the essence, not just of American liberalism, but of all liberalism. Liberals do not believe as St. Paul believed: “We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; Persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed; Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body.” (2 Corinthians 4: 8-10)

If you proceed as if you can destroy the tragic nature of existence without Christ, you will create a hell on earth, devoid of the only comfort there is on this earth. That comfort is that we bear in our body the death of Jesus Christ, but we also bear in our body the life of Jesus Christ. No European movement can save the European people unless it contains that truth, a truth our ancestors lived and breathed. They infused the ‘death in life, and life in death through Jesus Christ’ faith into their culture, and we were the beneficiaries of their bred-in-the-bone faith. It was the task of the intellectuals in church, state, and academia to drain ever last drop of Christian blood from our bodies so that we could be death-heads, without the pagan, temporary escape from his mortality through sex and blood and without the comfort of a death-conquering faith in Christ.

Now, instead of being persecuted but not forsaken, we are persecuted and forsaken, because no white person can find redemption in a democratic process created by Satan. And instead of being cast down but not destroyed, we are now cast down and destroyed, because that is the liberals’ intent, to destroy the white race at the behest of Satan. The liberals will never tolerate the existence of whiteness within Liberaldom, because in the liberals’ sick, distorted minds the white European, as the living sign of old Europe, brings tragedy and suffering into Utopia. There will be no tragedy and suffering, from the liberals’ point of view, if there are no more white Europeans. Nothing could be further from the truth. The antique Europeans did have a tragic sense of life, but they believed that they had united their souls to Him who came into the world to transcend the tragedy of existence. If you do not believe that Christ came into the world to “bear witness unto the truth” you will seek to destroy the Christ-bearing people who believe that to dwell with Christ is to dwell with death, a death that is transformed into the resurrection and the life.

The old prayer book tells us that in the midst of life we die, but in death we live – through Him who saves. The new liberal prayer book tells us that we shall all die as individuals, but the earth, cleansed of white people, can live on, populated by pure and undefiled people of color. How pathetic. The liberals’ utopia is a hellish dystopia that can only be put in place after the European people are severed from their past, a past in which the Son of the living God dwelt among non-diverse Europeans.

The current dilemma of the European people is depicted in Tennyson’s Idylls of the King, in the chapter titled “Merlin and Vivien.” Merlin is a wizard, albeit a Christian wizard, but his Christian faith is not of the blood; it is in his head. A man with that type of intellectual faith will despair when faced with the complexities of life. Such Pauline complexities as “Persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed” will be too much for the intellectual Christian.

Then fell on Merlin a great melancholy;
He walk’d with dreams and darkness, and he found
A doom that ever poised itself to fall,
An ever-moaning battle in the mist,
World-war of dying flesh against the life,
Death in all life and lying in all love,
The meanest having power upon the highest,
And the high purpose broken by the worm.

Despite the fact that Merlin knows Vivien is a treacherous harlot, he succumbs to her, because if a man has only an intellectual faith he will be overcome by the heathens of the blood and sex cults.

For Merlin, overtalk’d and overworn,
Had yielded, told her all the charm, and slept.

Then, in one moment, she put forth the charm
Of woven paces and of waving hands,
And in the hollow oak he lay as dead,
And lost to life and use and name and fame.

Then crying “I have made his glory mine,”
And shrieking out “O fool!” the harlot leapt
Adown the forest, and the thicket closed
Behind her, and the forest echoed “fool.”

The heathen liberals and the colored barbarians will completely annihilate the European people if they remain in the limbo of democracy and intellectual Christianity. But if Britons become Britons again, and Germans become Germans again, and… We know what is needed. All Europeans must renounce liberalism and take the vow, the same vow that Alfred and Tell took: From now till the ending of the world, we will fight for Christian Europe, because Christ, who brings us life in death, abides there. +

___________________

(1) Trump’s inaugural speech was quite impressive. He is quite impressive. His counterpart is not Ronald Reagan, it is Andrew Jackson, who, like Trump, had the courage of a lion. But the fatal flaw of liberalism still rang out in Trump’s speech. We do not all bleed the blood of patriotism. Patriotism is rooted in faith and race, and Americans are not of the same faith and race. The idea that we can win the blacks over by giving them jobs has been tried for over a century, and it has failed miserably. Blacks want to rape, murder, and pillage whites, they do not want to protect and defend a white Christian commonwealth. And liberals do not believe in the God who spoke to St. Paul on the road to Damascus. They believe in the savage gods of color.

The greatest movement in history? No, it wasn’t. Christ’s birth, death, and resurrection was the greatest movement in history. And we cannot come to believe in that divine entry into human history if we are not patriots of our racial hearth fire. While Trump was preaching American universalism, he should have noted that the people cheering were all whites. They, like, Trump, have a longing for genuine patriotism, but the democratic heresy of the great melting pot of Belial is the rock upon which all their hopes and aspirations will be smashed. It’s all very sad. There is still something in white people, something that is more than this world only. But they still have to get past cosmic universalism. If they don’t, Trump’s victory will come to naught.

Posted in Democracy, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Propositional faith | Tagged , | Comments Off on Our Fathers’ Europe

The Envenom’d Liberals

Posted on January 14, 2017 by cwny

“The point envenom’d too!” – Hamlet the Dane

_____

When ancient opinions and rules of life are taken away, the loss cannot possibly be estimated. From that moment we have no compass to govern us; nor can we know distinctly to what port we steer. – Edmund Burke

__________

John White got a temporary reprieve on the way to his execution. The gallows were struck by lightning. The death penalty will still be carried out, but not until a new gallows can be built. The people who know about such things tell us that it will take about 4 to 6 weeks to build a new gallows. What was John White’s crime? I tried to find out, but nobody in authority could give me an answer. In fact they got quite angry with me for asking about John White’s crime. As near as I could tell, the authorities took it as a given that John White was a heinous criminal and anybody who questioned that absolute was in danger of going to the gallows with John White.

Trump’s victory has the potential to delay the execution date of white people, but it will not alter the fact that the white race has been designated for slaughter by an implacable, satanically possessed foe. It is a liberal absolute that the white race is guilty of the original sin of whiteness. And they cannot be redeemed from that sin, because in the liberals’ bastardized Christianity there can be no redemption for the original sinners; only the non-sinners, the pure and undefiled non-white people of the world can find redemption. (1)

You cannot, if you are a European, separate yourself from Christianity any more than you can drain all the blood from your body and expect to live. But you can poison your blood with a bastardized Christianity and spew out poison every time you speak and act. That is the essence of liberalism – the liberals are envenomed with a deadly poison that kills everything they come into contact with. The only reason they do not die immediately is because Satan sustains them. When he has no more use for them he will welcome them into hell.

In Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, the evil queen does not die when she takes the devil’s magic potion, but it does turn her into a hideous old hag. Liberalism does to the soul what that devil’s potion did to the evil queen. And in some cases, such as Hillary Clinton, the devil’s liberal brew actually produces a physical ugliness that reflects her inner moral ugliness. If you look at pictures of Hillary when she was younger, you can see that she was never an attractive woman, but she was not the ugly monstrosity in her younger days that she has become. Mere age could not make a woman look like Hillary. Her inner moral ugliness has impressed itself even on her outward features. I’ve noticed this phenomenon more and more lately. The inner demonism of liberals is becoming visible on their outward features. Angela Merkel is another example. Is this some indication of a new stage in the great war on the Christ-bearing people? Has the liberals’ hatred reached such a white heat that it can actually alter their physical appearances? It appears so, at least in some of the more intense of the mad-dog liberals.

The liberals who are completely envenomed have envenomed the white grazers. If the grazers do not take the antidote they will surely die. And their deaths will precede the liberals’ deaths, because they are not the devil’s own, they are merely wayward sons and daughters who are so far from doing harm that they suspect none. But why can’t the grazers see the evil that is staring them in the face? They cannot see because the serpent of philosophical speculation (see “The Sacred Heritage”) has entered their inmost soul and is killing their Christian hearts.

The bard of bards, Jesus Christ, came into this world to destroy the serpent of philosophical speculation. The Europeanswho bent their knees to Christ believed that “Christ Jesus had entered their hearts making man’s world the world of God in man.” There is no such thing as an outward church of God. That is a pagan concept. The Church of Christ is God in human hearts. Destroy that church and you destroy the image of God in Man. Satan knows this and he has used the Christian churches to destroy the Church of Christ.

No one cometh to the Father except through Him and no man cometh to Christ unless he goes through the human heart. This is why our apostle, St. Paul, placed such emphasis on the circumcised heart. He knew the men of uncircumcised hearts, be they Jews (to the Jews a stumbling block) or Greeks (to the Greeks foolishness), would erect a pagan fortress of philosophical speculation to serve as the true Church while Christ’s church would be left outside. This has ever been the Europeans’ story. They have struggled with a “by the grace of God” heroism to maintain the “God in man” Christianity against the “world in man” and “God in systems” Christianity of the liberals.

It seems, but the true European “knows not seems,” that there can be no European counter-revolution, because the envenomed liberals, envenomed with the spirit of philosophical speculation, have killed European Christianity once and for all. But we shall see. The people who took Christ into their hearts once walked on water. If we reconnect with our people and their sacred heritage, we will dream dreams and see visions that will give us hearts of fire. We will become something much greater than a Nietzschean Übermenschen – we will become Christian Europeans.

Nothing, nothing, nothing will come from any electoral victory of a white candidate if the anti-European, anti-Christian barrier is not torn down. And it has not been torn down. A few weeks ago I mentioned a music video by Hank Williams Jr. called “Country Folks Will Survive.” I saw that video, with the contrasting worlds of the urban liberals and the white country folk, as a symbol of the Trump victory. The white grazers rebelled, for a moment, against the liberal establishment. But there was a telling weakness in the video. When Mr. Williams sang of the death of his friend in the city who was killed by a mugger, the mugger was portrayed as a white man. There is still an incredible, soul-killing fear in the white grazer of being called ‘racist.’ And that fear must be overcome before anything good will happen to white people as a people. Even if Trump builds a wall and limits Moslem immigration, whites will still perish unless they act as a people, a Christ-centered people, with one aim – to expel every Moslem, liberal, and colored heathen from their nation.

The heretical notion, based on a superficial reading of Chapter 20 of the Book of Revelation, that the unrepentant Jews are still God’s chosen people destined to rule over an earthly kingdom for a thousand year period sprang up in the sick, distorted mind of John Nelson Darby, who was an apostate from the Church of England in the 1800s. Why have his heretical beliefs become the beliefs of virtually all of the evangelical Christians who have broken from the mainstream denominations? Because the evangelicals need a people. They have accepted the liberals’ condemnation of European Christianity and the white race as gospel truth. And that acceptance has left them homeless. So what have they done? They have embraced a non-European version of Christianity that is a perversion of Christianity which ultimately leads to the denial of Christ as the Son of God.

Although there be no question that the Almighty, through all ages had been pleased to enlighten the eyes of many individuals among his chosen people, to see and know the secret purposes of his dispensation, yet it is certain that the great majority of the Jewish nation had, for some time prior to the advent of our Saviour, fallen into many gross and carnal errors, both respecting the Law and the Prophets. In regard to the former, they, and particularly the sect of the Pharisees, seem to have lost all sense of the end and purpose of the types and ceremonies enjoined by Moses, and to have substituted the minute discharge of his ritual as something excellent and meritorious in itself, capable of being received as an atonement for the neglecting those general points of virtue and morality, upon which that dispensation, as well as all that emanates from the Divine Author, was originally founded, and with which it ought forever to have been animated. But when the observance of the minute ceremonial was substituted, instead of love to God and duty to our neighbours, the system resembled some ancient tree, which continues to shew green boughs and a stately form to those who regard it only on the outside, but when carefully examined, proves rotten and false at heart, and valueless, excepting as a matter of outward show; “All green and wildly fresh without, but worn and grey within.”

Religious Discourse by a Layman by Sir Walter Scott

The Roman Catholic has also been left bereft of a home. When God is a nature-based system and not a God who enters human hearts, there is no need for a racial hearth fire. A long line of popes have condemned European Christianity and ordered the faithful to look to nature and nature’s gods (Mohammed and Mandela) as the ultimate saviors of mankind. And what have the more conservative Catholics done in response to their Pope’s liberalism? They have fled, like the millenialist evangelicals, to the heretical sects who still at least hold to an outward profession of faith in Jesus Christ. But is Christ to be found in a minute attention to the external ceremonies of the Church? No, He is not. We must never lose sight of St. Paul’s vision of Christ and His people, the people with the circumcised hearts. And who were those people? They are our people, the Europeans.

In 1950 Herbert Butterfield, the great English historian, wrote that the European people were living on the fumes of Christianity. What is left now? Well, what is less than fumes? A shadow? Yes, that seems to fit. There is still the shadow of a cross over the European people. We must make that shadow the heart and soul of our home, for where is our home, if it is not Christian Europe? The liberals, the envenomed liberals, tell us that we have no home. We, the original sinners, are told we must work to destroy every last remnant of our European home. Why must we do this? We must do this, the liberals proclaim, because there will always be the shadow of the cross over Europe. And the liberals and the colored heathen cannot abide even the shadow of the cross, so they must destroy all things European, and they must continue to slaughter the European people in the hopes that the cross of Christ, the European Christ, will finally disappear from the face of the earth.

The cross of Christ shall not perish from the face of the earth if the European people will return home. It is there, with their racial forefathers, that they will see the shadow of the cross become a great light, the light of the risen Lord, the same Lord that our apostle saw on the road to Damascus. Everything we do must be tied to St. Paul’s vision or else we, the European people, will perish bereft of the home that was bequeathed to us by our ancestors. We should protect and honor that home, because He blessed it with His divine presence. +

__________________________________

(1) Actually, it is a bit of a misnomer to talk about the colored races finding redemption. They don’t need redemption, because they are non-sinners. They are gods. We know this to be so, because our clergymen tell us it is so.

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Halfway-house churches, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Envenom’d Liberals

The Cross of Christ and Europe Are One

Posted on January 7, 2017 by cwny

They borrowed a bed to lay His head
When Christ the Lord came down;
They borrowed the ass in the mountain pass
For Him to ride to town;
But the crown that He wore and the cross that He bore
Were His own–
The cross was His own.

-Author Unknown

__________

Recently, while rereading Pickwick Papers, I was struck by the fact that the consummate villain, Mr. Jingle (who repents at the end of the book), was a pioneer in the use of internet English. He never speaks in complete sentences. Instead, his conversation consists of a few short phrases that he uses in rapid fire fashion. For instance, if Mr. Jingle was ordering food in an Italian restaurant, he would proceed along the following lines:

Waiter: What is your order, sir?
Jingle: Spaghetti with sauce – not too sweet – red wine – 1831 – good year, very.

When the waiter comes to collect the check, Jingle is equal to the task:

Jingle: Won’t pay – service slow, wine undrinkable, spaghetti terrible.

It is tempting to adopt Jinglese or internet lingo, especially when you have a wide variety of topics you want to discuss and you feel it is too difficult to weave them into coherent sentences and paragraphs. If I were to write in Jinglese, my weekly blog would look like this – Liberals hypocritical, very – Prince Charles, blasphemer – Drexel prof demonic – Pope the Antichrist—American media Satanic, very – and so on. But let us leave Jinglese behind, because after all he was the villain of Pickwick Papers for at least 750 pages, and put our New Year’s attack on Satandom into a more coherent form.

That the liberals have only one agenda, the destruction of the white Christ-bearing race, is glaringly apparent at every time of the year. But their demonism seems particularly, vividly clear at Christmas time, because it is at Christmas time that the much-maligned and spit-upon image of the Christ child still stirs the hearts of a small band of Europeans who stand as a sign of contradiction to Satanism.

Such Europeans stand outside the confines of Satandom. They are a hated and despised remnant of Christian Europe. That is what we must grasp before there can be a successful Christian European counterrevolution. Satan is now a conservative. When Madison, Jefferson, and Franklin were framing that pernicious, radical document called the United States Constitution, Satan aided them, because it was his goal to undermine all things traditionally European and Christian. (1) And when the French Jacobins took the satanic principles of Jefferson, Madison, and Franklin to their logical conclusions, Satan aided them as well. In those days Satan was a radical. But now it is his job to defend and extend the Kingdom of Satan on earth. That is what liberalism is all about: the defense and spread of Satanism.

If the spread of liberalism throughout the world was about anything other than the destruction of the white Christ-bearing race, there would not be such glaring discrepancies between what the liberals say and what they do. For instance – let us look at the Moslem invasion of Europe, which the liberals have welcomed with an evangelical zeal. Why should they do this when the Moslems seem to be opposed to every aspect of liberalism? The liberals claim to be concerned about the dehumanization of women. They do not think women should be treated like cattle or sex toys of men. But that is exactly how women are treated by the Moslems. Rape was supposed to be a very bad thing, yet the feminists of the West scream, “Better rapists than racists!” Hmmm, “There’s something wrong here,” as Walt Disney’s Goofy is fond of saying. And what about the Moslem’s religious intolerance? I thought freedom of religion was supposed to be one of the liberals’ sacred cows. Of course we know why the liberals do not oppose the Moslems. They never cared a fig about white women or religious liberty. What concerns them is the destruction of the white race, and that is all that concerns them.

The Trump election and the liberals’ reaction to it has shown us that the liberals do not nor have they ever believed in democratic government – they only believe in power. When they lose, they demand the system, which liberals created, should be changed. If it is not changed to suit them, they will go outside the law. At all costs liberal rule must be conserved and extended. And liberal rule means that the temperature of the liberal cauldron in which the white frogs are being boiled must always be increased and never turned down. Trump has never suggested that the white frogs be removed from the cauldron. He has only suggested that the temperature should not be increased. And because of that, he has become, in the liberals’ eyes, a combination of Adolph Hitler and the Bogeyman.

Let’s add the liberals’ reaction to Putin and Russian nationalism to the list of the liberals’ sins of hypocrisy. It wasn’t so long ago when Russia was a communist nation that we were told, by the liberals, to get along with the Russians. First, it was Uncle Joe, who was just like us, and then it was every Russian premier after Stalin whom we had to be nice to. When Reagan called communist Russia the “Evil Empire,” he was considered a reckless cowboy beyond the ken of liberal humanity. But what could possibly be wrong with applying the term “Evil Empire” to communist Russia? It was wrong, from the liberal perspective, because communist Russia was a mirror image of American liberalism. Both systems were Jacobin in origin with the satanic goal of eradicating the image of God in man by eliminating the white Christ-bearing race. Any critique of communism was a critique of liberalism. Putin’s return to Russian nationalism is not a return to Christian Russia, but he represents, like Trump, a step back toward older, more traditional European values. For that reason the liberals hate Putin and revere the precious memory of communist Russia and the sainted Fidel Castro.

Even mad-dog liberals such as Benjamin Netanyahu have fallen out of favor with the ‘beyond-mad-dog’ liberals of the new millennium. The state of Israel has come under fire for being insufficiently liberal! What is at work in the anti-Israel process is the dynamic that R. L. Dabney wrote about. Conservatism without a Christian basis is always one step behind radical Jacobinism, but it soon catches up to it, because it lacks a spiritual foundation; its adherents never cry, “This must not go on!” “Go a little slower,” is the pathetic battle cry of modern conservatives while the radical Christ-hating Jacobins cry, “Full speed ahead.”

The New Age liberals have placed Islam ahead of Judaism because they perceive that Islam is a more dynamic, radical anti-Christian force than Judaism. But a Christian European dare not chose one over the other (the Evangelicals have chosen Judaism, while the Roman Catholics have chosen Islam). The Christian European must cling to the one true God who cannot be blended with Judaism or Islam. There is only one morning star of Europe and his name is Jesus.

The liberals’ greatest hypocrisy has been reserved for the sacred negro. Under the guise of civil rights and equality the liberals have set the black race up as savage gods who have been given carte blanche powers to eliminate the white race. What does the massacre of whites have to do with equality? Can liberals actually live in a world dominated by the people they profess to love? Of course they can’t. If they get their way, they will suffer the same fate as Steven Otter, the anti-white activist from South Africa. That would not be a bad thing, but unfortunately the liberals will not be the only whites who are slaughtered.

The four monsters of Babylon – Church, State, academia, and the media – all bared their fangs during the Christmas season. In Church, it was Pope Francis, who kissed the Koran while exhorting the faithful to shun any contact with God that does not come through the mediation of the church. But if the Pope mediates in favor of Muhammed over Christ, the faithful will become Moslems. What is the Church? Is it an organization dedicated to the propagation of the nature religions of Islam, Judaism, and Voodoo, or is it the blood faith of loving hearts connected to Christ, the God above nature? If the pagan ideal of church, propagated by Pope Francis, the high pontiff of Babylon, falls, then the rest of Babylon will fall, because it is on that pagan theology that all of liberal Babylon stands – the idea that nature is God. The Roman Catholic cannot fight liberalism so long as he maintains his faith in organized naturalism. Nor can the Protestant who has returned to the paganism of organized Jewry. The “religious” devotees of Christian naturalism will always end up supporting the other three monsters – the liberal state, academia, and the media – unless they break with naturalism. If we keep Christmas in our hearts for 365 days of the year, as the ghost of Christmas present advises us to do, Babylon will crumble and fall. “Do you really believe such mush?” Yes, I do. There is a world of difference between faith in a system and faith in Christ. When the Europeans recapture the latter faith, we shall see miracles.

When Prince Charles enjoined his countrymen to think good thoughts about Muhammed at Christmastime, he was speaking for the leaders of Liberaldom throughout the west. They have already said, in their hearts, that there is no God. So why not cozy up with the powers of this world only? White Britons will only be able to live in a white Britain when they have leaders who cry, “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.” Trump’s victory does not place white Americans outside the Babylonian night that is enveloping Europe. The black menace alone, independent of the Mexican and Islamic menace, is enough to destroy the white American remnant. (2) And Trump has said nothing about fighting negro worship. I am glad that he got elected – he will keep the heat slightly below the complete annihilation level, but to defeat liberalism we need the whole ‘European thing’ – we need Ivanhoes, William Tells, and Alfreds as our leaders.

The Drexel prof who said that his Christmas wish was for white genocide as in Haiti was only unusual in his explicitness. The liberals usually are a little more careful about their phraseology. The prof, realizing he might have been too explicit, tried to pass his statement off as a little ‘joke.’ But he was not joking; he expressed the deepest aspiration of the liberals – their satanic desire to eradicate the white, Christ-bearing race. The Drexel prof was academia’s Christmas present to white Europeans. He reminded us that there can never be a Christmas truce with liberals.

And finally we come to the media. Is there one media spokesman in print or television who we can appoint as a spokesman? No, because they are legion. They no longer resemble anything human. Having renounced all things European and Christian, they have made themselves over in the image of Satan. The New Year will be just like the old year. Like the prophet Jeremiah, we look – even as Europe crumbles – for the coming of the Lord:

“The days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them,” declares the Lord. “This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time,” declares the Lord. “I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No longer will they teach their neighbor, or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest,” declares the Lord. “For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more.” Jeremiah 31: 31-34 +

_________________________________________________

(1) Andrew Lytle correctly labeled our Constitution, “the cynical balancing of powers.” And George Fitzhugh also recognized the deficiencies of ink-and-paper, Gnostic government:

“Bill of Rights, Acts of Religious Freedom, and Constitutions, besprinkled with doctrines directly at war with all stable government, seem to be the basis on which our institutions rest. But only seem to be; for, in truth, our laws and government are either old Anglo-Saxon prescriptive arrangements or else the gradual accretions of time, circumstance and necessity. Throw our paper platforms, preambles and resolutions, guaranties and constitutions, into the fire, and we should be none the worse off, provided we retained our institutions – and the necessities that begot, and have, so far, contained them.

“All our necessities were begot and contained by the European people’s faith in the baby Jesus born on Christmas day.”

 (2) We should never forget the warnings of men like Anthony Jacob and R. L. Dabney – Negro worship is Satan Worship.

“But while we believe that “God made of one blood all nations of men to dwell under the whole heavens,” we know that the African has become, according to a well-known law of natural history, by the manifold influences of the ages, a different, fixed species of the race, separated from the white man by traits bodily, mental and moral, almost as rigid and permanent as those of genus. Hence the offspring of an amalgamation must be a hybrid race, stamped with all the feebleness of the hybrid, and incapable of the career of civilization and glory as an independent race. And this apparently is the destiny which our conquerors have in view. If indeed they can mix the blood of the heroes of Manassas with this vile stream from the fens of Africa, then they will never again have occasion to tremble before the righteous resistance of Virginian freemen; but will have a race supple and vile enough to fill that position of political subjection, which they desire to fix on the South.”

Posted in Christmas, Defense of the White Race, Democracy, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Comments Off on The Cross of Christ and Europe Are One