The Burning White Child

Posted on August 24, 2013 by cwny

We are afraid to put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason; because we suspect that this stock in each man is small, and that the individuals would do better to avail themselves of the general bank and capital of nations and of ages. Many of our men of speculation, instead of exploding general prejudices, employ their sagacity to discover the latent wisdom which prevails in them. If they find what they seek, and they seldom fail, they think it more wise to continue the prejudice, with the reason involved, than to cast away the cost of prejudice, and to leave nothing but the naked reason; because prejudice, with its reason, has a motive to give action to that reason, and an affection which will give it permanence. Prejudice is of ready application in the emergency; it previously engages the mind in a steady course of wisdom and virtue, and does not leave the man hesitating in the moment of decision, skeptical, puzzled, and unresolved. Prejudice renders a man’s virtue his habit; and not a series of unconnected acts. Through just prejudice, his duty becomes a part of his nature. – Edmund Burke On the Revolution in France

__________

In Shakespeare’s Macbeth two men stand on the heath facing evil incarnate. Both were tempted. One man, Banquo, calls on divine grace to help him resist the devil:

Merciful powers,
Restrain in me the cursed thoughts that nature
Gives way to in repose!

While the other man, Macbeth, succumbs to the devil:

I have done the deed. Didst thou not hear a noise?

Was there a noise when Pope John XXIII was full of “charity and forgiveness” for the blacks who tortured and murdered his people? Did he feel any pangs of conscience? No, because he was much further down the slippery slope than Macbeth. Macbeth had a guilty conscience because his ideological armor was not as strong as Pope John XXIII’s armor. The armor of liberalism is proof against any assault from that cumbersome thing called a conscience. The post-Christian, the liberal, is too fastidious to torture and murder directly, so he kills and tortures second hand. He takes a voyeur’s pleasure in watching the colored barbarians torture and murder white people, especially white children. The more innocent the victim, the greater delight the liberal takes in their suffering. It is now the standard practice in our society to hand white babies and white children over to black apes to be tortured and murdered. And at the top of the list is Jonathan Foster, a 12 year old white boy, who was kidnapped by a black, female, subhuman in 2010. He was tortured and murdered with a blowtorch. Which gives the liberals in church and state great delight. They like to think on the pain and suffering of Jonathan Foster. Did he repent of his whiteness before he died? Or did he die without comprehending why he had to suffer and die? And all of these satanic black torture murders never get the punishment they deserve. The Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom torture-murderers are still seeking retrials, while liberal lawyers plead for their “rights.”

That we must suffer much on this earth and die is the result of original sin. But that white people must be singled out and made to suffer more than mankind’s traditional allotment of suffering is a result of the liberals’ inverted Christianity. The abstracted faith of the medieval scholastics became the faith of a few European intellectuals, and over time that abstracted faith spread, like the green slime in the campfire horror stories, and engulfed the European people. Now virtually all Europeans, except the few that have broken free of the green slime of liberalism, experience life second-hand: they love and hate in the abstract.

And their abstract hates and loves, because the Europeans were once Christian, are expressed in the forms of medieval theology. The devil is the white man, so the liberals delight in hearing tales of his sufferings. And the new Christ is the black man, so the liberals delight in the tales of his triumphs over the devilish white man. Communion takes places wherever two or three liberals are gathered together in the black man’s name.

The liberals are covered with the green slime of Satanism and they love it. They have become monsters of cruelty because they are abstracted from everything human. God’s grace comes to us through human rivulets and streams, and if you dam up those waterways you have cut yourself off from God. Those Europeans, the men and women I call grazers, have taken off some of the green slime but not enough to see clearly and resist liberalism. Lacking a religious view of life the grazers are unable to recognize the religious dynamic of liberalism. The Christian hero is a hero because he can see good and evil clearly. Lacking that Christian second sight the grazer accepts the liberals’ multi-faceted justification for black atrocities. When the atrocities are in South Africa: (1) “Such atrocities only happen to bad whites”; when they happen to whites in European countries: (2) “They are just isolated incidents; you can’t condemn a whole race of people for one isolated madman”; when a white child is tortured and murdered: (3) Nothing – there is silence, as if the torture and murder never happened. And if you say it did happen, you are a racist. And racism, only white racism, is the original sin.

The grazer is forever seeking redemption from the devil. Just as Blanche DuBois depended on the kindness of strangers, so does the white grazer depend on the kindness of liberals. But there is no kindness or mercy in the hearts of men and women who have hardened their hearts against the living God. Only a lack of negro energy and opportunity prevents every single white child from suffering the same fate as Jonathan Foster. “If we had but world enough and time,” the colored barbarians lament. “We will make sure you get world enough and time,” the liberals respond.

Burke, and then Richard Weaver in agreement with Burke, insisted that a man could not live without his prejudices. Our prejudices stem from our deepest intuitions about the nature of existence. The rational mind can only guide and direct the passions of the heart. If our heartfelt prejudices about life are held to be null and void we will be lost souls, because abstracted reason cannot sustain the inner man. A man without prejudices is a caricature of a man, all outer husk and empty inside.

The vicious barbarian race of blacks are permitted to murder whites with impunity, because the liberals are satanic devils who have made the prejudiced European a proscribed criminal. What do liberals look for every time one of the infinitude of black atrocities becomes public? They look for the prejudiced white man. They want to know if there is a white man who dares state the obvious: “These black murderers should be killed instantly, without reference to our satanic court system or the white-hating, Christ-hating clerical wolves in sheep’s clothing.” A real European should never play the “Let’s be moderate – Mustn’t be prejudiced!” game every time there is a black atrocity. “I won’t be rational and moderate: I will be prejudiced, because I hate the devil and his minions and I love my people,” should be the European response to the vicious black butchery that surrounds us. What did the British do to the torture murderers of their own people in the devil’s den of Cawnpore? They tied the perpetrators to canons and blasted them into little pieces. They did this because they were prejudiced: they loved their people in and through Christ, and they hated Satan and his colored devotees. Their prejudices were right and pure and noble. Far from eliminating such prejudices we should seek to strengthen them so that we will respond to black barbarism as Europeans should respond.

A few days ago there was a report of a murder committed by two negroes and a mulatto. Christopher Lane, a young Australian man, visiting his girlfriend in a rural Oklahoma town, made the mistake of going out jogging, and three subhuman creatures followed him in a car and gunned him down in a drive-by shooting. When they were taken into custody, according to the District Attorney, the sub-humans just laughed. They know nothing of consequence will be done to them; they are the liberals’ gods. They should be strung up on the nearest tree, but instead they will be sent to some recreational facility for a short while and then sent out to murder more white people. The whites always treat such atrocities as something that can’t be helped, like some natural disaster, or what the insurance companies call ‘acts of God.” And to the liberals the black outrages against whites are just that: they are acts of God, the sacred negro god to whom all whites must be prepared, at all times, to offer up their lives. Nor does it stop with the white man’s life. He must also offer up his soul to the great black gods. “As he wills so shall I do,” is the sacred oath of the white to his black god.

Every white government has proclaimed the negro to be the supreme God, with the other colored tribesmen serving as subordinate deities. So in every white nation, “acts of God,” which mean bloody black atrocities committed against whites, will be in direct proportion to the amount of blacks that liberals can cram into their nations. Rich liberals will try to survive the holocaust they are responsible for starting, by living in gated communities away from blacks, but the colored hordes cannot be avoided forever. If they are not stopped the only way colored hordes can be stopped, they will eventually kill every last white, just as they did at Cawnpore. Colored tribesmen must be either ruled or killed; there is no other way to deal with them. Of course you can worship them if you hate the Christian God and yearn for the extermination of the white race.

The pride of reason makes the white man reject Christ in favor of abstract systems of thought. In this the white man resembles the Orientals who have always regarded the Incarnation as foolishness. But the Oriental has no Christian past, so he remains as he always has been: an addict of abstract philosophical and mystical systems. He does not need a savior in his systems, because he never, as the white man did, abandoned his abstract systems for Christ. The post-Christian white man has returned to abstract, irreligious philosophies, but with an added dimension. Unable to live without a savior, because of his Christian past, the liberal replaces Christ with the negro. It is the white man and only the white man who worships the black race; hence it is the white race and only the white race which is committing racial suicide.

Macbeth, who had supped full of horrors, horrors largely of his own making, still had problems with his conscience. Lady Macbeth (“Unsex me here”) was finally unable to resist her conscience. And yet our modern liberals have an amoral armor that can resist the strongest pangs of conscience. They are truly dead to all grace. Should we consent to let such people set negroes loose among us to torture, rape, and murder whites at will? We must live among liberals, but we should never be of them. The beastly white sluts who cohabit with negroes and turn over their white babies from previous couplings to their negro mates to be murdered, the liberal academics who teach negro worship in the schools, and worst of all the white-hating, anti-Christian churchmen, must be held accountable for their murderous treachery. These people and their colored gods are our mortal enemies. We won’t be reasonable, we won’t be law-abiding, and we won’t be non-violent in the face of the unspeakable black atrocities which are encouraged and abetted by them. Jonathan Foster and every white victim of black atrocities, especially the children, must be avenged. That charity of honor demands that we do so.

I have lived among liberals my entire life. And I was brought up to be of them, but by the grace of God I am not of them. There is a line separating the liberal from the European. It is the line of abstraction. When once the European abstracts, because his ego demands that he abstract so he can create an abstract world ruled by him, he becomes a liberal and ceases to be human. He loves only his abstract creations, such as his negro gods, and he hates everything human, particularly those people who championed the non-abstract, humane God. Only the love of something human, that seems more than human, can keep a European from becoming a liberal. If a man, a European, can look at the collective face of his ancient people without seeing Christ and falling down on his knees in reverence and awe, he will become one with Satan and he will dwell in an eternal Babylonian night in this world and the world to come.

I go back to the first Europeans. They were the conquerors of the great Roman empire, yet they fell on their knees before Christ. And He bid them rise and ride, to go forth and subdue the heathen and protect innocence, above all to protect innocence! That burned, tortured child, Jonathan Foster, will always be part of me; we mustn’t forget him and we must never allow the cruel, inhuman liberals and their cruel, inhuman negro gods to revel in their barbarities unopposed by men who love and hate with all their hearts. Monstrous, merciless egoism built Liberaldom.

The passionate love of our European hearth, presided over by the King of Kings, shall bring it down:

It was not long ere it made its way,
A thrilling ceaseless sound:
It was no noise from the strife afar;
Or the sappers under ground.

It was the pipers of the Highlanders!
And now they played Auld Lang Syne.
It came to our men like the voice of God,
And they shouted along the line.

And they wept, and shook one another’s hands,
And the women sobbed in a crowd;
And every one knelt down were he stood,
And we all thanked God aloud.

From “The Relief of Lucknow” by Robert Trail Spence Lowell +

Posted in Christianity: Neither a Theory Nor a Philosophy, Defense of the White Race, Grazers, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on The Burning White Child

The Return to Our European Hearth Fire

Posted on August 17, 2013 by cwny

“I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee.” Luke 15: 18

__________

In my twenties, shortly after legalized abortion reared its satanic head in America, I used to pass out anti-abortion literature on street corners and at malls. Abortion proponents would frequently tell me that unless I could tell them what was to be done with all non-aborted babies I had no right to rail against abortion. Of course the pro-aborts were trying to evade the central point by focusing on my inability to tell them how the non-aborted babies were to be cared for. Their feigned concern for starving non-aborted babies was simply demonism masquerading as a social conscience. The central point was, “Should we permit the murder of infants?” No specious pragmatism could change that central point.

I often feel like I’m back passing out the anti-abortion literature and arguing with the pro-aborts when I talk about the necessity of white solidarity, which entails the segregation of the white race from the colored hordes. Liberals condemn white apartheid as evil, and the more conservative types say, “It’s not practical; how would you do it?” If I can’t give the latter type of individual a ten point plan for achieving perfect, non-violent segregation then I am deemed impractical, and Mr. Conservative goes back to his failed policy of “winning the colored people over” to whatever solution Mr. Conservative is peddling, which is usually democratic capitalism. But Mr. Conservative, like the abortion proponents, is missing the central point. There is no dichotomy between what is moral and what is practical. If apartheid is the correct moral response to the “race problem,” then there can only be debates about the means to achieve racial apartheid: there can never be any question of giving up on apartheid because it is deemed too difficult to achieve.

I for one don’t believe apartheid is too difficult to achieve, because I don’t believe that anything white people want to achieve is impossible. Look at the miracle of Christian Europe and then try to tell me apartheid is too difficult. You can’t do it. What is lacking in the European people is the moral will to keep their faith, which they have lost, and their people, which they have abandoned, separate from the colored hordes. Once the moral will of the Europeans is restored, which is one and the same as their faith in Christ, they will become a separate people again, loving their own and defending them against the colored tribesmen.

Of course there is no magic wand that can make the European people become a Christian people again. Something much greater than magic must occur. There must be that meeting, depicted by Michelangelo on the Sistine Chapel ceiling, of the hand of God with the hand of the European. The European must let go of his systems, which are the gold and silver caskets which promise paradise but bring hell, and take up the leaden casket wherein the Christ of the European hearth dwells. In that casket is life eternal, in this world and the world to come.

Recently, a friend sent me an article about Orania, a “self-sustaining” white community on the fringes of South Africa. A small group of whites, about 1,000 people, have formed a community which uses no black labor and is based on mutual aid and the religious principles of the Afrikaners, the Boers. I don’t know for how long the “Shoot the Boers” President of South Africa, Jacob Zuma, will allow Orania to exist, but I do think that the desire, among whites, to be separate from the colored tribesmen and to cling to their own people and their peoples’ past is a very good thing that whites throughout the world should imitate. And in saying that I am not suggesting that whites in Britain, France, America, etc., should necessarily imitate the specific economic measures and political structures of the people of Orania. Some managerial types think that the most important thing in life is to think up a system, be it economic, political, or religious, and impose that system on all people everywhere. I hold with Burke, who supported France’s monarchial system for France while asserting its impracticality for Britain, when he said that economies, governments, and social structures must spring up organically from the lifeblood of the people: they cannot be superimposed upon them from without by abstract theorists. What I found heartening about the Orania venture – and I hope the information I received was true – was the example of a white Christian people determined to live apart from colored people and support each other. The means will vary according to the varied difficulties whites face in their own nations, but all whites should want and seek apartheid.

What whites should not want is to be part of democratic, multi-racial Liberaldom. My heart soared when I heard there was an organization called the English Defense League, and it sank when I heard that the English Defense League was a multi-racial, multi-religious group of men and women committed to a rainbow coalition against violence. How can you be an English Defense League if you’re not committed to defending white English people, who are the only kind of English people? And how can you fight violent thugs while allowing members of thuggish religions and races into your coalition? A nation consists of men and women of one race and one faith; there is no other kind of nation. People who gather together under any other national banner besides race and faith are liberals, who are a bastard offshoot of the human race, having the outward forms of human beings while resembling inhuman devils inside.

We cannot look at any aspect of the Europeans’ history as a people without looking at their faith. Prior to the 20th century Europeans saw no dichotomy between the love and protection of one’s own, through apartheid and other measures, and the love of Christ. Loving your neighbor meant, to the antique Europeans, loving your own and respecting the right of the stranger to love his own. But this older Christian practice gave way, in the 20th century, to the hatred of your own kind and the worship of the colored races, particularly the black race. This new doctrine seems, from my perspective, the perspective of the old Christians, to be a satanic reversal of the Christian faith, changing the religion of Christ into the religion of Satan. And if you look at the fruits of this new Christianity as espoused by the organized “Christian” churches, I do not think it is possible to come to any other conclusion than: “They have gone over to Satan.”

If the modern churchmen are right – that the negro really is the true god – then we are of all men most to be pitied. It means we have believed a lie. But there is still the Church of Christ which exists where two or three are gathered together in His name. Those two or three have met by their racial hearth fire and called on Him by name. In Him, through Him, the people of the mists, the Europeans of old, were close to Him because they were close to the people of their own race. So long as we are closer to our organized, negro-worshipping churches than our own people, we will remain a people without a faith and without a nation.

The pride of the modern churchmen is without parallel in the history of a church that holds pride to be the original sin. But of course sin, in the new dispensation, only exists in the racist past of the white man. There is no sin in the modern churchmen. And they prove their sanctity by denouncing the “selfish” white people of the present, and the “racist” white people of the past:

“Mirror, Mirror, on the liberals’ wall,
Who is the most wonderful cleric of them all?”
“I am, I am,”
They all shout with glee.
“I hate the white and love the black–
Surely that is a saintly pedigree.”

Let me go back to the abortion wars. On several occasions I stood in front of an abortion clinic, trying to baptize the child about to be aborted. I don’t believe God damns a baby for a mother’s sin, but then again one has to believe that baptism makes a difference because our Lord enjoined us to do it. On one occasion an irate black woman, about to abort, cursed at me and called me a European. I thought about that intended insult later. A European? Little did that negress realize that to me the title “European” is a sacred badge of honor. I have no illusions. When the roll is called up yonder, I will be at the end of the European line. I am the least of the Europeans, lacking the heroic mettle of those who came before me. But I have chosen to stand with them, so the least of the Europeans will still be of them. How could I, or any European with a heart that still lives, not desire to stand with them rather than with the negro-worshipping minions of Satan? In an old western a villain who robs and kills in hot blood tries, in the presence of the hero, to disassociate himself from his companions  in crime who rob, rape, and kill in cold blood. “I’m not like them,” the head villain asserts. The hero isn’t buying it. “You ride with them!” The clerics ride with the negro-worshipping, white-hating, Christ-hating liberals: they have crossed the bar of humanity and entered the domain of Satan.

The key to the return of the white man is not a magic key. It is a sacred key that opens the door to the Europeans’ past. I have read many a volume of quaint and forgotten European lore. I know that the antique Europeans were not all saints. I see them without rose-tinted glassed, but having acknowledged their very human weaknesses we must, if we respect the truth and love what is good and noble, acknowledge that the antique European people showed us how a people should live, loving their own in the presence of the living God, who shed His grace over the people who reached out to Him and called upon Him by name. “Because he hath set his love upon me; therefore, will I deliver him: I will set him on high, because he hath known my name.”

Now the European sets his love upon the negro and abstract systems about God which have no living God within them. When all of the liberalism is burned out of the European’s blood, the liberalism in church and state, then he will once again set his love upon the living God. The passionate love of our people in and through Christ, and the hatred of the liberals and their colored allies, will be the white heat that burns Liberaldom to the ground. The new Europe that emerges will not be like the old Europe in its externals, but the new Europeans with hearts of fire will be like their ancestors in spirit. That which is within, the better part, is what unites us to our ancient people and their God.

Within the ploughed furrow and frequented pasture of our own race is the grace abundant that leads to God. Outside our own furrow and pasture there is no grace, there is only a universalist mirage that cloaks an arid desert of modernity. When we are true to our racial hearth fire as Ratty was true to his river we will see our Lord as he meant us to see Him, and we will act and love like Europeans were meant to act and love, as defenders of our own against all the world. And our return home will be as the prodigal’s return:

“For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found.” +

Posted in Christianity: Neither a Theory Nor a Philosophy, Homeland, Muscular Christianity, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Comments Off on The Return to Our European Hearth Fire

The Shadow of the Cross

Posted on August 10, 2013 by cwny

This mixed system of opinion and sentiment had its origin in the ancient chivalry; and the principle, though varied in its appearance by the varying state of human affairs, subsisted and influenced through a long succession of generations, even to the time we live in. – Edmund Burke

__________

Woodrow Wilson ran for reelection under the banner, “He kept us out of war.” Upon winning the election, Wilson entered the war under the banner, “The world must be made safe for democracy.” When I was a school child I accepted that Wilsonian inanity as a valid reason for World War I, just as I accepted a similar inanity as the American justification for entering World War II on the side of Communist Russia. That the world must be made safe for democracy is still the rationale for the foreign wars of aggression the United States and Israel indulge in, but I no longer accept the democratic justification for such wars.

The democracy gambit was first used by the French Jacobins to overthrow the French government. And it has, in subsequent years, been used to successfully destroy all the traditional governments of Europe in order to build up a democratic culture that is in direct contradiction to the traditional, Christian culture of the antique Europeans. The older culture was built on the non-abstract, instinctual, heartfelt faith of the European people. It was built on faith and sustained by prejudices; a prejudice in favor of one’s own over the stranger, a prejudice in favor of Christ over Satan, and a prejudicial preferment for the traditions of the past over the abstract theories of the future. The new democratic culture was based on an abstracted, heartless ideology. Its democratic adherents favored the colored stranger over their own people, Satan over Christ, and an abstract, theoretical utopia of the future over the traditions of old Europe. The wars of the first half of the 20th century, cultural wars and battlefield wars, were fought to make the world safe for the Jacobinism which Wilson called ‘democracy.’ The cultural and battlefield wars of the second half of the 20th century were fought to preserve and extend Jacobin democracy. Liberty, equality, and fraternity were institutionalized, and their opponents were exterminated whenever possible and marginalized when extermination was not feasible. Who were and are the opponents of liberty, equality, and fraternity? All white Europeans who remain prejudiced in favor of their own people over the colored stranger and in favor of Christ over Satan.

The great tragedy of the early 20th century was the destruction of the type of Christian ethos exemplified by the men on the Titanic. That charity of honor, bred in the bone of the antique Europeans, was distilled out of the blood of the European and replaced with an abstract faith in democracy. This, as we have seen, has resulted in the worship of the negro and the hatred of the white man, because the colored man, the non-European, is the noble savage, untainted by the culture of the white man. He is the stuff that utopian dreams are made on.

Every civilization has a religious dynamic that sustains it. When that dynamic loses its force the civilization dies and is replaced by a new civilization with its own religious dynamic. The dynamic of liberalism, which has replaced Christianity, is based on abstract reason, the noble savage, and science. Abstract reason allows men, not God, to plan for the happiness of mankind. The noble savage provides a human conduit to all that goes with a Babylonian nature religion. And science provides the material sign that an abstract system of democratic government, coupled with the worship of the negro, is a moral progression. Why? Because if we are progressing scientifically, then we must also be progressing morally. The exact opposite seems to be the case from a Christian, European standpoint, but the modern European does equate scientific progress with moral progress. No one wants to appear unscientific, because that would be conceding that you are stupid, and being stupid is the modern counterpart of ungodliness. One longs for a hero, a Third Dumb Brother, with the bred-in-the-bone faith to attack the Castle Dangerous of Liberaldom without fear of being called ‘stupid.’ We, the European people, lost our defenders in the 20th century, and now we have entered the 21st century without any defenders. The conservatives in the 20th century, unlike the 19th century conservatives, were not defenders of the European people. They were defenders of an abstract utopian system that blended democracy and negro worship under the all-seeing eye of science. Even at this late date, when the unholy trinity lies before us in all its sinister glory, conservatives – even those who call themselves white nationalists – still want to trade with the devil by invoking democracy and science instead of bardic Europe and the God of bardic Europe. The old hymn tells us that there is power in the blood of the lamb. There is power in the blood of the lamb, but only if we are connected to that blood through our racial hearth fires where the dear Christ enters in. He won’t be found in the citadels of higher learning or in the negro-worshipping churches.

C. S. Lewis correctly observed that those who deride sentiment always have a sentiment of their own that they hold as inviolate. The liberals in church and academia constantly deride, ridicule, and condemn any white man who is attached to his European heritage and does not want it despoiled and overridden by a new, liberal-imposed, racial Babylon. Such a white man is condemned, because it is self-evident, to the liberals, that the older European civilization was evil because of its racism and sexism. And the new civilization, which the liberals get all sentimental about, is good and pure, because it is an interracial, sexually promiscuous civilization.

A few months ago I saw a 15-minute travelogue about Switzerland, made in the late 1940’s. It was such a pleasure to see whole towns and villages that were completely free of colored people. There was one segment in particular that made me feel sentimental, a shot of some Swiss villagers making their way to a small chapel at the top of a hill. The large cross atop the chapel seemed as if it cast its shadow over the entire village. Is that not what Europe was all about? The cross of Christ enveloped us as a people and provided us with the religious dynamic to keep our racial hearths free of the colored barbarians. But we are not supposed to talk like that anymore. There are no bad colored people. When they commit barbaric acts, the acts are somehow transformed by liberal magicians into the understandably desperate acts of a people yearning to be free. “How many years…” We know the liberals’ sentimental litany by heart. The black man can do no wrong because there are no bad blacks, only racist whites who force blacks to do seemingly bad acts, which in reality are not bad. Need I go through the atrocities? The torture, murder, and rape of white people by blacks is a daily, minute-by-minute occurrence wherever blacks and white inhabit the same geographical area. And there is never one voice raised against black atrocities. But let one black man be abused by a white, either verbally or physically, or let one white man defend himself against a black thug, and all the forces of hell – the liberal press, the academy, the government, and the media – will descend upon the white man:

The Press, no matter how violent the Negroes become, deplores whatever action the white people take to defend themselves. The moment the victimized law-abiding Whites make the least attempt to defend themselves in this one-sided war, the Press at once conjures up a host of ultra-decent and super-expert authorities – to express their abhorrence at such inexcusable racialistic brutality. If, in this Holy War, this Jehad, the Whites should dare to show signs of fight, there are always ‘informed observers’ at hand to stress the damage to America’s international standing. There are always renowned international saints of all colours to voice their sadness and dismay, and politicians to sound their ‘grave warnings’. There is always ‘world opinion’ to vent its revulsion, and American opinion up in Montana or someplace to express ‘a growing feeling’ of horror. Above all, unless white Americans hurry up and get mixed they will outrage informed public opinion among important African cannibal States living on white American taxpayers’ money. For year after year after year the Performing Poodle Press stands on its hinder legs and goes through its repertoire of corny tricks, and still the people are mesmerized by it.  – Anthony Jacob in White Man Think Again!

Anthony Jacob, who could quite accurately be labeled the last great Englishman, called the liberals war against whites a Jihad. He is correct. Only a religious zeal superior to the zeal of the Jihadists can stop a Jihad. What the liberals are trying to organize is a liberal-led democratic Jihad against the white Europeans. This is the reason why liberals want to bomb Moslems in Islamic countries and welcome them into their own countries to rape, murder, and pillage. In their own countries the Moslems pose a threat to the liberals’ democratic Jihad because they are not democratic, but when the Moslems come to European countries they are good because they are destroying the white Christian culture of the European country by exterminating the white Europeans. And this is the pattern with every single non-white racial group. The Mexican drug lords are bad when they kill Mexicans in Mexico, but they become good when they kill whites in America. The Chinese are bad when they gun down their own students in Tiananmen Square, but they are good when they come to Europe to murder whites and further pollute the universities and schools with their fiendish Oriental philosophers. Sax Rohmer’s novels, which are now condemned as racist, accurately depict the Asian. They are geniuses of cruelty, addicted to abstraction and opium. Which makes them welcome fellow travelers in the liberals’ brave new Babylonian war. But I needn’t go on and list every single non-white race. They all hate each other while hating the white race most of all. The liberals are trying to unite them in their common hatred of the white man. But a unity of hate against the Christ-bearing race will only result in an endless night in which animalistic semi-human creatures tear each other limb from limb. For it was the white race that imposed upon the colored tribes whatever order and decency they ever possessed in their nations. Take away that beneficent hand of order and decency, and you have Haiti, Mexico, Africa, India, and China, cesspools of debauchery, butchery, and villainy.

While the liberals spend all their time and energy cataloging the evils of the antique Europeans they neglect to tell us the most important thing about the antique Europeans. There existed, in their civilization, that charity of honor that never existed in any of the colored nations. That charity of honor was the result of the Europeans’ incorporate union with Christ. All the anti-European propaganda and the avalanche of praise and reverence for the colored people of the world is put forward by the liberals because the claim that the antique Europeans represent all that is evil and the coloreds represent all that is good is in direct contradiction to reality. What light there is in the modern world is a remnant light that still emanates from old Europe. When the liberal sponsored liquidation of everything European is complete there will be no light anywhere in the world. The liberals themselves will only live long enough to see that last bonfire of whites go up in flames before eternal night descends upon the earth. Donald Davidson’s poem, “Sanctuary,” tells us of a world gone mad with the hatred of the light emanating from the white Christ-bearing race.

…you may lie
On sweet grass by a mountain stream, to watch
The last wild eagle soar or the last raven
Cherish his brood within their rocky nest,
Or see, when mountain shadows first grow long,
The last enchanted white deer come to drink.

I have a deep and passionate love for the people in that Swiss village and every village throughout old Europe. Without having ever met them I know and love them, because they are my own people. Their loves and hates are my loves and hates, and I want no other life in this world or the next than to be joined with those dear old people from long ago and the God of those people. This is obviously a sentiment that the liberals do not share, and in fact they sneer at such sentiments. They seek a heaven on earth, devoid of my people and my God. At the liberals’ banquet is an unholy alliance of treacherous whites, colored tribesmen, and Satan himself. “Around the devil’s unholy throne in robes of Satanic darkness we revel,” is the liberals’ litany.

All white neighborhoods must become black, the Obama administration has commanded. And throughout Europe the word has gone out: “There must be no white villages in Europe.” Everywhere in Europe the colored minions of Satan must be planted so that Satan can rule in the lands where Christian Europeans once dwelt.

It won’t happen, because the Christ-centered European won’t let it happen. However deeply rooted, however numerically superior, the liberals and their colored minions will be rooted up and destroyed. They are the conquerors right now, but the future of Europe belongs to the men and women of Europe who still see the shadow of the Cross over all of the European lands. The liberals and the colored heathens, united in hate, are no match for the Europeans united in the love of our provincial hearth fires, presided over by the living God. We, who love much, shall never surrender or abandon our sentimental attachment to the European past in which Christ, not Satan, and not the negro, casts His shadow over a provincial, segregated people consecrated to Him. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Bred in the Bone, Democracy, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Shadow of the Cross

Europe’s Man of Sorrows

Posted on August 3, 2013 by cwny

But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. –Isaiah 53:5

__________

The liberal media has a fascination with white gangsters and white serial killers. Every day, if you so desire, you can hear a story about John Gotti or a creature like Richard Speck. Such cruel inhuman men are outside the pale of humanity and fill us with horror. The liberals, who claim to abhor violence, do us no service by continuing, day after day, to give us detailed portraits of such brutish animals. The loving, detailed reporting of their crimes desensitizes people and deflects their attention away from a criminal race of people, the negroes, who have made murder, rape, and torture commonplace.

There is a huge contradiction in the liberals fascination with white gangsters and white serial killers. The white gangsters and the white serial killers are moral pariahs, a shocking reminder of the potential evil in the human soul. But such men shock us because they are so unusual and because we as white people do not believe that hideous, inhuman barbaric acts are normal, funny, or justifiable. Unless – and this is the liberal contradiction – the hideous barbaric acts are committed by blacks upon white people. Then what is rightly considered barbaric and hideous when done by white criminals is considered by the liberals to be normal, funny, and justifiable when committed by black people. The atrocities committed by white people are done by a tiny criminal class while the atrocities done by black people are committed by an entire criminal race. There is no such thing as an atrocity story in the black culture because they do not look on murder, rape, and torture as atrocities. Such activities are just normal expressions of their nature, so how could such things be considered criminal atrocities? A South African farmer is beaten and left for dead by four African thugs. And when he goes to court, shortly before his death from injuries sustained in the beating, the black apes just laugh at him. A 44-year-old British mother of twins has acid thrown in her face by a black monstrosity and his Pakistani companions, and they laugh with glee. Are such commonplace crimes, commonplace wherever the African barbarians are allowed to roam, the result of poverty or of white oppression? No, the crimes are the result of a lack of white oppression. The black race is a race of violent savages. They commit crimes of violence for the sheer joy of committing crimes of violence, and only a fear of white reprisals will stop blacks from behaving like barbarians. This is so obvious that I shouldn’t even have to write it down. Yet all the traditional vehicles of culture – press, church, state, and schools – tell us with unremitting, relentless repetitiveness, that it is the white male that we have to worry about. He is racist, he is sexist, and therefore he is not human. If only, the united liberal voices tell us, the white man could be eliminated from the life of the nations then all mankind, minus the white man, will be happy. White females will be allowed in the brave new world so long as they agree to breed colored children, thus becoming the harbingers of a new Babylonian kingdom of Satan. The utopians promised us heaven on earth, but they have given us hell on earth.

This new Tower of Babel culture that the liberals have built, this hell on earth, has come to us in the same way as the old Tower of Babel culture came to us, through the negro. Just as Nimrod, the descendant of Ham, founded Babel (“And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel”), so has the elevation of the negro to divine status served as the cornerstone of the New Tower of Babel. Every last vestige of a people committed to the living God is being eradicated under the banner of the negro, who was and always shall be the conduit to a universalist culture of the devil:

And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech… And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.

We must conclude, when we see that even “scripture-based Christians” ignore the Biblical connection between negro worship and devil worship, that there must be a desire for truth actuating the human heart before Scripture, church documents, or good counsel can move a man to embrace the living God. As we love so we shall be. The modern Christian loves the negro as the antique Europeans once loved Christ, and as a result the modern Christian is not a Christian, he is a devil worshipper. Just assume for a moment that there is a devil who roams about the earth seeking the ruin of souls. His greatest foe is Christ, whose one weakness (from the devil’s point of view) is that He cares for those miserable creatures called men. So the devil seeks to attack God by attacking the creatures Christ cares about. He disregards the colored tribesmen, because they already belong to him. He concentrates on the Europeans, the Christ bearers. And what better way to convert the Europeans to devil worship than to go into the Christian churches and present Satanism as Christianity? ‘Thou shalt have no other gods before me,’ becomes ‘Thou shalt worship the negro and him only shalt thou serve.” And in serving the negro, the European becomes the willing servant of Satan, at war with Christ and His people.

There are alternative news sites on the internet that provide the European people with information the liberal news media will never mention. These sites tell of the unceasing, relentless attacks on white people by colored barbarians. I certainly don’t want to see such sites shut down, but there is something lacking in the websites that merely catalog atrocities against whites. Where is the call to arms? Where is the awareness that we are in a religious war which we cannot afford to lose? Nor will we lose it, if we fight with the same passion and zeal against principalities and powers that our European ancestors fought with. The internal battle is everything. Once the modernist shackles are taken off, the seemingly hopeless war against Babylon will no longer be hopeless.

I’ll state the obvious because I don’t see the obvious being stated. The white man won’t fight unless he has something to fight for. And he doesn’t believe he has anything to fight for because under the guidance of the clerics and academics he has become a universalist. He is not attached to his racial hearth fire:

To be attached to the subdivision, to love the little platoon we belong to in society, is the first principle (the germ as it were) of public affections. It is the first link in the series by which we proceed towards a love to our country, and to mankind. The interest of that portion of social arrangement is a trust in the hands of all those who compose it; and as none but bad men would justify it in abuse, none but traitors would barter it away for their own personal advantage.

The white man is not stirred to a rage when he sees atrocities being committed against white people because he thinks in terms of universals. Those people, the white victims of black atrocities, don’t strike a sympathetic chord in the hearts of the white grazers because the grazers have said in their hearts, “We have no people,” which is the same as saying, “We have no God,” because we come to know God in and through our people. And the liberals delight in the black atrocities against white people because every atrocity brings them closer to paradise on earth. They are the men of the hardened hearts, and no amount of pleading or reasoning will move them, for their sympathies are with their gods, and their hate is directed against the white man.

White people are different from the people of color: they are the only people who cannot be stirred to fight solely for self-interest. Yes, the criminal class of whites can be stirred by self-interest only, but whites as a people must have a religious raison d’être. The liberals fight for their new Christless, messianic, negroized utopia. What do the grazers fight for? For nothing, which is why they are passive spectators in the ongoing extermination of the white race.

The colored tribesmen have always been against the white race. When the white race was strong they feigned sympathy for whites because it was in their self-interest to do so. When the white race became weak the colored tribesmen bared their fangs and showed the folly of those who thought that Haiti was an aberration, rather than a look into the soul of the black man. What changed in the 20th century was not the black man but the white man. A ruling class of post-Christian liberals emerged who needed a new god to replace Christ. These demonic creatures hate the white man with a religious zeal that knows no bounds. Crimes against blacks by word or deed are punished with the greatest severity because such crimes are blasphemy. Witness the recent national news story, delivered by white broadcasters with funeral dirge looks on their faces, about – horror of horrors! – a white football player who had used the word “nigger.” The sport commentators could not even bring themselves to say the word: they reported that a white football player had used the ‘n-word.’ Is it not crystal clear that the civil rights movement, which would have been wrong in and of itself, is not a civil rights movement? This ‘civil rights’ movement is a religious war:  The liberals want to dethrone Christ and replace Him with the negro, the conduit to Satan. And in order to kill Christ, the liberals have had to kill the hearts of the European people, where Christ dwells. They think they have done just that – killed Christ by removing Him from the hearts of His people. Have they?

At present there seems to be only one spiritual force, albeit a demonic force, within the body of the European people. All the European societies are structured around the hatred of the European and the love of the colored stranger, particularly the negro. The passionate haters, the liberals, might even be a minority in terms of numbers, but the grazers, who have lost their racial hearth fire and have no passion, are as nothing. They are waiting for… they know not what.

The godless Raymond Chandler – at least in his outward statements of belief – was groping for an answer when he wrote about the hero: “Down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid.” A dim racial memory of Christ? Yes, I think such dreams of the hero are subterranean, nighttime memories of Christ, which the rational, daytime mind of the white man rejects. When the Christian hero emerges he will know, unlike Philip Marlowe, why he walks down the mean streets, and he will know who sustains him against the terror by night and the arrow that flieth by day. The good man, the European, fights for what he loves. Once the European sees what he has lost, his racial hearth fire warmed by the living God, he will return to his racial hearth fire and defend it against all the world. But of course the white man must see what was lost. This is why the European, who by some miracle of grace has remained connected to the European past, must not despair and leave the liberals in sole possession of the field. Christ’s Europe must not perish. So long as one knight refuses to let go of the vision, eternal Europe lives, even in the face of the liberal terror and the colored barbarians’ arrows.

Reading the accounts of black atrocities against whites avails us nothing if we don’t use such stories to move us closer to our race and the God of our race. The kingdom of heaven, and the glimpses of heaven vouchsafed to men here on earth, come to those who love much. The European was different from other races because he saw, and loved, the divine humanity in the Man of Sorrows. By His sign only, the sign of the cross, we conquer. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Halfway-house churches, Liberalism, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Comments Off on Europe’s Man of Sorrows

The Liberals’ War of Extermination

Posted on July 27, 2013 by cwny

In peace there’s nothing so becomes a man
As modest stillness and humility;
But when the blast of war blows in our ears,
Then imitate the action of the tiger;

-Shakespeare’s Henry V

__________

In a wise and sensible book, American Statesmen on Slavery and the Negro, written in 1971, Nathaniel Weyl and William Marina, after first describing how the great majority of American statesmen in the past had favored segregation, stated that most of the racial problems that currently existed in the United States could be solved by granting white people the right of private association. The two men basically outlined a system that existed in the Southern states after reconstruction ended. Schools, churches, and neighborhoods could be free, if white people chose, of colored people. But of course Weyl and Marina were laboring under the false assumption that the liberals wanted whites and blacks to live their lives free of racial conflict. Weyl and Marina were writing five years after the white genocide immigration law of 1965 had passed. Liberals officially declared war on the white race with that infamous act of treachery, much more infamous and treacherous than the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. After all, the Japanese were not attacking their own people.

Weyl and Marina were quite right. Their “good fences make good neighbors” policies, if implemented back then, would have resolved the race problem to the extent that the race problem could be resolved. But as we have seen over the last 40+ years since that book appeared, the liberals did not want there to be peace between the races: they wanted a war of extermination in which only the colored barbarians, under liberal guidance, were doing the killing. Never in the history of warfare has a war of extermination proceeded so successfully.

The liberals first won the propaganda phase of the war: they gave their followers an ideological passion, and they killed the will to resist in the white grazers. Then they proceeded with the killing, which is — without the whites resisting — simply a routine mop-up operation. It reminds me of an old board game called Stratego that I used to play as a child. The purpose of the whole game was to get one or two high ranking pieces that your opponent could not kill, because you had killed all your opponent’s high ranking pieces. Once you had achieved superiority, the game was over except for the slow methodical killing off of every remaining enemy soldier. The enemy could not strike your higher ranked soldiers; they could only run and avoid being killed for a short time. That is the position the white man is in. He can’t kill the enemy; he can only avoid being killed for a short time, and then the game is over.

The sad fact is that the white man has lost the military board game of life, and he now watches helplessly as his opponent annihilates him. Is there no way out? Let me go back to that game of Stratego. There was no hope within the confines of the board game for a player who had no high ranking pieces. But because I thought the wooden pieces with the pictures of the various soldiers on them looked really neat, I often took my Stratego soldiers off the board and played a different game. In that game a lowly scout could take battlefield command and lead his men, by a surprise attack, over a secret mountain pass to victory over a seemingly invincible foe. The important thing was to take my army off the board where everything had a precise mathematical outcome and place my soldiers in a position to fight battles where imagination and initiative counted more than math.

It’s obvious where I’m going with the Stratego analogy. In the board game called democracy the white man is dead. He is doomed to just sit and watch while the white race is annihilated by the barbarian hordes of color, because that is the rule of democracy. South African whites didn’t play by the rules at first, but then they caved in to the rules, with the end result being that soon there will be no whites in South Africa. And the rest of the European nations, who have also agreed to play by the rules, will share the same fate as the whites in South Africa. Unless – yes, there is an ‘unless’ – white people decide not to play by the liberals’ democratic rules. Why should a white man consent to the extermination of his race because his democratic leaders and the barbarian hordes of color have voted in favor of the extermination of white people? Where is it written that what is morally right is to be determined by popular vote? Christ was crucified instead of Barabbas after a popular vote, and Christian Europe perished when the democratic age was ushered in. Truth is undemocratic, and the truth is that only one people made Christ incarnate in their civilization, and only a revival of the divine spark that existed in those “dear old people long ago” will give white people of the modern era the will to fight for and preserve the white race.

A few months ago on a public television station I saw the great great-grandson of Charles Dickens, Gerald Charles Dickens, doing a reading of some of his famous ancestor’s works. I cannot adequately describe how I felt. Dickens was one of the supreme poets of the Christian era of Europe. Through so many of his characters we feel closer to Christ, the true King of Europe. And here, in the flesh, was a descendant of the man who gave us Samuel Pickwick! My tongue cannot utter…

For most people, even Dickens aficionados, the public readings of Dickens’ work by his great great-grandson might be an interesting oddity, but not something to make the blood quicken and the heart soar. But for me it was something more than an interesting oddity, because Gerald Dickens was reading, with great spirit and heart, his great sire’s works. The blood and the spirit of Charles Dickens came alive on the stage during the readings. And this is what happened in Europe once the European people took Christ into their hearts and their homes. Christ himself took center stage in Europe! He was in the European people, spirit and blood, and the European people were in Christ, spirit and blood. However, when the work of abstraction was completed, a work that was first embodied in the French Jacobins, Christ became an intellectual construct, hovering on the fringes of Europe, to be completely denied or to be used only as a supporting deity in a pantheon of greater gods. He was no longer incarnate in and through the European people. And because He is no longer incarnate in and through the European people, the European people are being exterminated by the colored heathens with the encouragement and support of the liberals.

The intellectuals (as distinct from intelligent men) in the church have been treating white people for centuries now like white rats in a lab experiment. At first white people represented generic mankind, and as such they could be poked, probed, and experimented upon at the pleasure of the intellectuals. There was no concern for the survival of the white race, because in the opinion of the church intellectuals there was no such thing as a ‘people.’ They had certain abstract ideas about different peoples, which they did not bother to examine closely for truth. One race of people was as good as any other: they were all cannon fodder for the church intellectuals. Then, when the church intellectuals discovered that the abstract mass of colored people were more easily manipulated and controlled, less troublesome, the church intellectuals’ attitude toward white people shifted from indifference to open hostility. Their abstract Christianity was not dependent on the incarnation of a living savior within the hearts of a flesh and blood people, it was only necessary that the churchmen amass an aggregate herd of people who would rubber stamp the new abstract Christianity of the churchmen. The same process was at work in the secular society. After dethroning the monarchs and the aristocrats, the Jacobins sought out “the people” in order to elevate them to the divine status once held by the God of the European people. But when “the people” of Europe were found to be too European (which, translated, means too Christian) to truly represent man in all of his pristine, primitive glory, the liberals sought out the noble savage in all his many guises. He was the oh-so-intelligent-and-spiritual Asian, he was the noble and persecuted red man, he was the hard-working Aztec, and above all he was the godlike black man.

The secular liberal and the abstracted-from-his-God clergyman all embraced the gods of color, with the black man as the foremost god, while banishing the evil white man from the liberals’ pleasure dome. But in doing so they banished God from their pleasure dome as well.  Christ comes to us through human hearts, and if the only people who showed they had a human heart are banished then… Yes, that’s right, then God does not enter in, He stays outside the borders of Liberaldom. So now we have a war being waged against a people who have no will to fight, because their God has been taken from them and they know not where He is to be found.

The living God is to be found in the depths of the human heart, depths that only the antique Europeans plumbed. The liberal has repudiated the God who listened to His people crying out to Him from the depths. And the colored barbarians have never known the God who lives in the depths of the human heart, except when they saw the light of that God emanating from the people of Europe, the hideous white people who are supposed to be the cause of all the evil that is in the world. Without the moral force that can only come from the Christ of old Europe, white men can either become maniacal, white-hating, negro-worshipping liberals or grazers, men without a spiritual home, waiting to be exterminated by the colored barbarians with the full approval of the liberals. It’s ironic that the colored invasion of every European nation did not come at a time when the European nations were militarily or economically weaker than the colored nations. There were no armies with tanks, modern weaponry, or nuclear arsenals that made the European nations surrender to the colored hordes. No colored army made the white government of the United States in 1965 begin the process of making the United States an anti-European, Christ-hating nation. No Moslem army made Britain or France turn their nations over to Moslems: both countries had armies that could have turned back any invading force, but instead they opened the gates and let the enemy flood in. And in every nation of Europe the scenario is the same. Without a shot being fired the armies of color are destroying the white nations. All of this is happening because there is no European will to fight, because the European has said in his heart there is no God to fight for. Dostoyevsky posed the question, “Can a civilized man, a European, believe in the divinity of Christ?” He – a man of spirit and blood — answered that question with a resounding, “Yes, he can.” But Dostoyevsky knew that wisdom comes from the heart, not the head. An ego maniac — and ego mania is the mark of the liberal – cannot know God. He can only know his own sick utopian dreams of a satanic black god who presides over a Babylonian pleasure dome. He dreams of spreading his evangelical faith in the negro throughout the whole world. Like the apostles of old he has gone forth to preach the gospel, but his gospel is the gospel of Satan.

Wherever we turn in this land of Liberaldom we are confronted with the gospel of liberalism. In my own anti-white nation, for instance, the Secretary of HUD (Housing and Urban Development) Shaun Donovan recently said that he was going to step up his campaign to ship negroes into communities in the United States that still don’t have those blessed creatures. His twisted reason? Because the areas in which blacks live are too crime-ridden, so he is going to send them someplace where they will be safe! That’s like removing tigers from the jungle so they won’t be attacked by large striped cats that have been seen prowling the jungle: and then, strange to tell, the same type of attacks started occurring in the areas in which the tigers were relocated.

The mad-dog liberals are beyond the ken of humanity; they are Satan’s own and there is nothing to be done with them except oppose them with all our heart and soul. The other whites, the grazers, are in the gray, misty region where they are too liberal to oppose the liberals, but too European to feel completely at ease with liberalism. Those whites need to see that we all — we Europeans of the post-Christian age — are born in the fetters of liberalism. Break all of those fetters, not just a few, but all, and the essential European will emerge, the man of spirit and blood who will not stay confined within the rules of the liberals’ board game. He will impose his own rule on the liberals, which is a very old rule and the prayer of the antique Europeans: “Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Christianity: Neither a Theory Nor a Philosophy, Democracy, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization, White Genocide | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Liberals’ War of Extermination

The Better Part

Posted on July 20, 2013 by cwny

The whole drift of their institution is contrary to that of the wise Legislators of all countries, who aimed at improving instincts into morals, and at grafting the virtues on the stock of the natural affections. They, on the contrary, have omitted no pains to eradicate every benevolent and noble propensity in the mind of men. In their culture it is a rule always to graft virtues on vices. – Letters on a Regicide Peace by Edmund Burke

__________

I was brought up by liberal parents who sent me to liberal schools and a liberal church. So naturally I grew up with a liberal world view. But slowly over time, I unburdened myself of my liberal beliefs. One of the first liberal dogmas to go was evolution. My 8th grade social studies teacher showed us all the charts and diagrams in a slide show, depicting the ape, the “missing link,” Cro-Magnon man, and then modern man. You know the progression: we all had to memorize it in school. The whole notion struck me as absurd, and I told my teacher so. She then told me that I had been brought up with – horror of horrors – “religious prejudices!” and that was why I couldn’t see the truth of evolution. I wasn’t articulate enough to tell my teacher that I had not been brought up with religious prejudices, I had been brought up to believe in evolution; before I was knee-high to a grasshopper I learned that ‘man is a monkey, therefore we should all love one another.’ While I still don’t believe in evolution, I will concede that my teacher back then, and the liberals right now, could make a strong case for evolution. It’s ironic that the fervent liberal evolutionists never use their strongest argument for their beloved doctrine: the negro. Their whole case rests on our willing suspension of disbelief in the missing link, so why not turn the disbelief of skeptics (such as me) into belief by saying, “Here he is: the negro. He is the missing link between ape and man.”

I thought of my 8th grade social studies class and evolution when I saw the pictures of the two apelike negroes who murdered a 1 ½ year old white boy. Although CNN, one of the bastions of negro worship, told us it was a robbery not a hate crime (CNN presumed that 1 ½ year olds carry over $100,000 in cash), the subhuman negroes killed for no other reason than hate, a maniacal hatred of whites and innocence. If the white remnant ever becomes inured to this type of negro butchery, then there will be no white remnant.

The first stage in every war is the ideological stage, in which the enemy makes their case for war. The liberals have done that. They established, in the minds of their fellow liberals, an unimpeachable case against white people, which amounted, in the main, to one damning charge: white people were impeding the march to utopia because of their ‘racism’, their ‘sexism’, and their Christianity. Eliminate white people and utopia would come. The liberals were the prime movers, the true believers, but they also accomplished another goal of all wartime propagandists: where they failed to completely convince they sowed doubt. The grazer might not buy every single item on the liberal agenda, but he no longer believes, because of liberal propaganda, that the Europeans of old had anything to pass on to future generations. And that is all the liberal needs from the grazer. Once the grazer lets go of all his lifelines to the past he will have to (it’s inevitable) grab onto the liberals’ lifelines to the future.

Once the propaganda work has been done, the actual killing part of the war can take place. That is what is now taking place throughout the formerly European countries. The brutal murder of the 1 ½ year old boy was horrific, but it was not unusual. Such crimes, which used to occur primarily in the colored lands, are now rather commonplace in the Western world. The colored races have always hated the white. What has changed is the white race. Now the ruling liberal elites in every European nation encourage and abet the colored races’ murderous assaults on white people, which is why I maintain that what is to be done with liberals is now only a matter of tactics. We know what should be done to them – they have handed over our people to torture and death, and they have established, throughout the European lands, the reign of Satan. Is such evil going to disappear because we petition and vote? I’ll admit that there is not currently a moral climate within the ranks of the remnant Europeans to support the type of war that is necessary to defeat liberalism, but we should be developing that moral climate so our people will be able to mount a fight against a merciless foe that will not be satisfied until every last white is eliminated from the face of the earth.

The current moral climate in the European world is a completely amoral climate. Much more important than a nation’s laws, Burke observed, is a nation’s manners, because a system of manners is what constitutes the life of a nation:

When to these establishments of Regicide, of Jacobinism, and of Atheism, you add the correspondent system of manners, no doubt can be left on the mind of a thinking man concerning their determined hostility to the human race. Manners are of more importance than laws. Upon them, in a great measure, the laws depend. The law touches us but here and there, and now and then. Manners are what vex or soothe, corrupt or purify, exalt or debase, barbarize or refine us, by a constant, steady, uniform, insensible operation, like that of the air we breathe in.

The revolution in our moral sentiments, in our manners, was the deciding factor in the negroization of Europe. If the inhuman manners and amoral sentiments of the negro are the keystone of a new utopian world, should it not be our task, the Europeans, to build up European moral sentiment and European manners that contradict and stand in opposition to the negroized utopia of the liberals? What good will it avail us to elect conservative or nationalist candidates to office if the prevailing moral climate is a liberal negro-worshipping moral climate? I remember William F. Buckley Jr.’s boast that Reagan’s election represented a shift in the American people’s internal compass. That assumption was pure fantasy. The moral sentiments of the American people remained just as liberal after Reagan’s election as they had been previous to it. The American people had simply grown tired of Carter’s method of institutionalizing a negroized utopia and were willing to try another method: they had not changed their manners and moral sentiments.

The French Jacobins made a drastic change in government that highlighted their shift from a bred-in-the-bone Christian culture to an amoral, atheistic utopia, but all the nations of Europe made similar shifts in their national sentiments. A people can have a revolution without changing their government apparatus in the slightest degree. All they have to do is change the manners of their nation and use the existing governmental structures to institutionalize the change in manners. “When manners were corrupted, the laws were relaxed; as the latter always follow the former, when they are not able to regulate them, or to vanquish them.”

The corruption of manners as regards race-mixing, drug use, abortion, homosexuality, and divorce all preceded the relaxing of laws against those practices. It is of no use appealing to the law to reverse an evil, such as negro worship, when the law has institutionalized negro worship in response to the changing moral sentiments, what Burke calls manners, in favor of negro worship. If we were to go back in time to a Southern church in the 1880’s, what would the attitude of the parishioners be to negro worship? And the same church in 2013? Why the tremendous shift in the moral sentiments of white people? Certainly the people had been influenced by their clergymen, but the clergymen were simply caving in to the pressure from the liberal, secular culture surrounding them, so we still need to find out why the clergy succumbed to liberalism and why the white Christians succumbed to the liberalism of the clergy. I think we need look no further than this thing called ‘science.’ The word ‘science’ connotes so much more than the study of the physical world. Science has come to mean truth. To think scientifically is to think objectively. “Scientific studies show…” “I based my findings on science.” To be progressive is scientific and therefore good; to be unprogressive is unscientific and therefore bad. This rather simple formula was never stated outright because it was considered, by the liberals, to be too obvious to need an explicit formulation. But everything that the European held sacred could not be defended in scientific terms. The major tenets of the Christian faith could not, without bastardizing the faith, be explained scientifically. Nor could the essential moral sentiments stemming from that faith be defended scientifically. It’s unscientific for a man to rise from the dead, it’s unscientific for a demonic spirit to roam the earth seeking the ruin of souls, and… The list goes on and on. If scientific thought is the highest thought then the antique Europeans are wrong, and the liberals are right. And we can’t go halfway with the liberals as the anti-evolution evangelicals do. They reject monkey-to-man evolution while ceding to the liberals moral, evolutionary superiority regarding democracy and race-mixing. “Onward and upward!” To what? To whom?

The white every man has become a grazer, staying on the outside of himself, wondering why he is divided from himself and against himself. He is suffering from that division of self because he feels a vague longing for the bardic past of the Europeans while he marches into the future under the banner of scientific truth, which encompasses the worship of nature and nature’s god, the negro. Only the complete rejection of every single aspect of the liberals’ moral evolutionary future will enable the white man to avoid walking, zombie-like, into a future that is devoid of white people and the God of white people.

The liberals present their scientific world of democracy, sexual freedom, and negro worship as a moral progression. But is it a moral progression? From a Christian perspective it is a step backward to the basest form of idol worship and bestial sexual practices that dehumanize and debauch. It is the liberals and their conservative allies who are looking back, just as Lot’s wife looked back, at a pagan world devoid of white people, which they hope they can take into the future with them, buttressed up by a progressive and scientific rationale. It is technological heathenism, this vaunted new world of the liberals’ making, conceived in hell, just like the old heathenism. When the European turns to his Christian past, completely rejecting every aspect of the liberals’ moral evolution, he will see life feelingly again and cease to be a spiritual half-breed, with one foot in the modern world and one foot in the world of old Europe. The reason British soldiers get their heads hacked off in their own nations by Moslem barbarians, 1 ½ year olds get shot in the face by negro apes, white South Africans are exterminated by blacks while the liberal world applauds, and demonic popes give religious sanction to the extermination of white people, is because the European has no moral sentiments. He has left behind the bred-in-the-bone Christianity for a new Christianity, an abstract Christianity solely dependent on liberalism, to provide him with his moral sentiments. I know neither the day nor the hour, nor do I know if the day will ever come, but if the European steps away from every single aspect of liberalism, not, as he currently does, picking some aspects of it and rejecting others, everything that seems impossible now – the segregation of the races, the restoration of the Christian patriarchal family, the end of legalized abortion and homosexual marriage – will all seem possible, even inevitable.

The true, integral European is the natural enemy of the colored heathen and the liberals; he can’t rest easy until both groups are banished to the swamps and bogs at the edge of his beloved homeland or else driven off the face of the earth. The story of the Brothers’ Grimm is so apropos. During their lifetimes their books of mathematics, science, and grammar were thought, by intelligent men, to be the legacy of the Brothers’ Grimm. But as the years passed, it turned out that it was the collected fairy tales of Wilhelm Grimm that were the sacred legacy of the Brothers’ Grimm. So it is with the European people. The liberals claim that their synthesis of technological barbarism with colored barbarism is the enduring legacy of the European. No! That legacy will only endure in hell. The eternal legacy of the European people is their belief in a fairy tale about a young carpenter, a third dumb brother, who ventured forth and defeated all the forces of hell, armed only with an intrepid spirit and divine love that passeth all understanding. Reclaim that fairy tale faith of our ancestors, and the moral sentiments that go with that faith will follow. Apish negroes will not be allowed to kill white children, babies will not be murdered in the womb, and no white Christian will worship at the altar of the negro. All this follows from a fairy tale? Yes, but it must be the white man’s fairy tale, the fairy tale of fairy tales which was championed and proclaimed by the one people who saw the light of the world and believed in the light of world. +

Posted in Bred in the Bone, Europeans and Christ, Grazers, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism, Scientism | Tagged | Comments Off on The Better Part

Clerical Devils

Posted on July 13, 2013 by cwny

The Bishop was there in his lace and lawn,
And the cassocked priest, — I saw him yawn,–
The rich and great and virtuous too,
Stood smug and contented, each in his pew.

-Thomas Nelson Page “The Needle’s Eye”

__________

Let’s first state what the satanic Pope Francis did, and then we shall put what he did in its proper context. Pope Francis went to Lampedusa, a small island off the coast of Italy, and criticized Europeans for their indifference to African “refugees.” The spawn of Satan said that he felt a “thorn in his heart” when he thought of the poor refugees. What did he feel for the Italians who are being displaced by the “poor Africans”? And is there no thorn in his heart for the white South Africans, who are being tortured and murdered by government fiat in South Africa? Of course not. Pope Francis has the satanic faith called liberalism, and as a devotee of that satanic faith he must worship the black and hate the white. From the depths of hell he can hear his satanic master urging him on to greater and greater blasphemies. From Pope John XXIII’s loving “charity and forgiveness” for black torturers and murderers, through the now “sainted” John Paul II’s inspired love for all non-white races and all non-Christian religions, to the present Pope’s hatred for the European people and his “love” for the murderous negro, the apostasy of the “conservative” churchmen is a tale written in blood, the blood of the white man. There was a time in my life when I bent over backwards to attribute good, albeit misguided, motives to negro-worshipping clergymen. Now, having observed these creatures over a longer period of time I no longer apply the ‘good but misguided’ label to the modern clergy. If they just loved the negro, we might call them misguided, but they worship the negro and hate the white man. Such blasphemy and such hatred does not stem from men who are merely misguided, it stems from men who have given themselves over to Satan. The Roman Catholic clergymen preceded the Evangelical Protestants in the rush to embrace negro worship, but the Protestants have caught up to the Catholics. The worship of negroes, which entails the hatred of the white man, along with the deification of the unrepentant Jew, is dogma in all of the “conservative” churches.

There is nothing new about the worship of the noble black savage and the deification of the Jew. This has always been the essence of liberalism. Burke makes repeated references to the alliance the Jacobins forged with organized Jewry. And he also points out the terrible consequences to the whites in Haiti when the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity were applied to negroes and mulattoes. What is new is the institutionalization of liberalism, comprised of the worship of the negro, the hatred of the white man, and the deification of the unrepentant Jew, within the conservative Christian churches which formerly considered themselves the bulwark of orthodoxy, fighting against the liberalism of the mainstream churches. Now, the conservative churches mute their criticism of the radicalism of the mainstream churches’ sexual politics and make negro worship and the Judaization of Christianity the major tenet of their faith.

The conservative “Christians” are proving Burke’s maxim: “You can’t have just a little bit of liberalism.” Once the conservatives abandoned their connection to Christ through their people, through their blood, they were fit for nothing but blasphemy and racial treason. Men cannot live without feeling some connection to a people whom they love above all other people, and they cannot live without a God to whom they feel connected through their people. When the conservatives abandoned the bred-in-the-bone Christianity of the antique Europeans they were lost in the desert of modernity, and they sought refuge in the oasis of liberalism. Now they have a people, the Jews, and they have a god, the negroes. Just as the antique European became one with God through his blood ties to his kith and kin, so do the liberals and their new conservative converts stay connected to Satan through their ties to their negro gods and the unrepentant Jews.

The liberal is a lapsed Christian. Like his progenitor he has a grudge against God for His failure to run the world according to the proper principles – Satanic principles. Unable to immediately dethrone God, the liberal, in imitation of Satan, seeks to attack God by destroying His image in man. And where did we see the image of God in man? We saw His image in the collective face of the antique Europeans. Destroy those people and their culture, and you have, according to the liberals’ beliefs, destroyed God. The great tragedy of the conservative churches is that they didn’t defend that which was essential to the faith, the image of God in man. They succumbed to the support-your-local-priest-or-local-minister heresy. Never mind that your local priest and your local minister have become universalists, loving the negro and hating the white. So long as they don’t recommend adultery and homosexual marriage, they must be okay. Is that the sum total of Christian orthodoxy? I thought it was more than a few ‘thou shalt nots.’ I would have thought, from viewing the Europeans’ past, that Christianity was a faith of passion and fire: a passionate fiery love for one’s own, that exceeded the love of the colored tribesmen for their own by a thousand-fold, which was rooted in a blood connection to the living God whose love passeth the understanding of mere rationalism.

You cannot love as God would have men love, in spirit and in truth, if you do not love through the channels of grace that God has so beneficially provided for mankind. Those small channels of grace are filled by our attachments to our kith and kin, and they only flow outward into larger tributaries when they are maintained as separate channels, sacred and unavoidable. No one who betrays their own kind can truly love the stranger. The good Samaritan did not, after tending to the stranger’s wounds, invite him into his home and force his daughter to have relations with him. He cared for him outside his home and left him at an inn, because he had learned charity at home. If the good Samaritan had been a liberal, he would have passed the stranger by, gone on to his work, and then signed a petition for the enfranchisement of all aliens and the disenfranchisement of all Samaritans. The true Christian missionaries such as Edmund Hodgson were racial segregationists who evangelized the stranger because they were thoroughly European. The great “love” of the modern Pope Francis-type clergyman is pure egotism. “See how good I am by what I do for the negro while attacking the white.” Such colossal egotism does not come from God, it comes from God’s satanic antagonist.

The history of the white man’s experience in Haiti as chronicled by T. Lothrop Stoddard and the history of the white man’s experience in Africa as chronicled by Anthony Jacob have shown us the difference between the white and the black. At their worst white people sought wealth in Africa and Haiti, indifferent to the fate of blacks. But at their worst the whites did not torture, murder, and rape the blacks. And most whites helped the Africans while helping their own as well. In contrast, the blacks have committed outrage upon outrage against the whites, and the liberals of the European world have stood by and applauded them. No, applause would imply some human characteristics: the liberals have howled like jackals.

The liberals have been telling us for centuries that liberalism is moral evolution. I don’t quite see this moral evolution. How can they maintain they have morally evolved when they have consecrated themselves to the negro, who now does the same things in the cities of New York, Pairs, London, etc., that he has done since time immemorial in Africa, namely, rape, plunder, and murder? Such a morality is only a moral progression if the religion of Satan is superior to the religion of Christ. But that is the goal of liberals, to dethrone God. And the elevation of the negro to divine status is a major part of the dethronement process.

The white Christian missionaries were never able to Christianize the black. The witch doctor’s message of murder and sacrifice was always more appealing to the blacks than the missionaries’ message of a divine savior full of charity and mercy. A man has to have some sense of his own sinfulness before he can feel the need for mercy. And he has to have some stirrings of humanity in his heart before he can practice charity. This is the moral evolution we are supposed to lend our support to: A world ruled by black witch doctors, devoid of charity and mercy. Must we accept such a world just because our churchmen tell us we have to?

We’ve been over the false reasons the conservative Christians give for hating whites and worshipping blacks (see “The Evening Mists of Europe”). There is no need to go over them again. Let’s focus on the real reason that church men like Pope Francis worship negroes and hate the white: They haven’t any faith in the Christian God of the antique Europeans. Their faith is in this world only. To be courted and loved in this world, you must kiss the feet of the powers that be in this world. And the liberals are the powers that be. The churchmen use the language and the symbols of the Christian faith to cloak their treacherous betrayal of the Light of the world. They started with the betrayal of their race, and they will end up raising the banner of Satan in every organized Church in the formerly Christian nations of Europe.

There is always greater danger for the defenders of Christian Europe (and we defend a remnant who are bereft of their homeland) when a Bishop “turns insurrection to religion.” But that is the case. The Christian Pharisees who have made a god in the image of the negro are in open rebellion against the Christian God. It’s difficult in the face of such massive, institutionalized support for Satanism not to despair. That is what the liberals want: they want the white Christian to despair and die. For that reason, but not for that reason alone, we shall not despair and die. Our hatred of the liberals is only half of the equation. There is also our love of our people and their God that sustains us. From a purely biological standpoint an individual human being is a mere nothing, his life force can be taken away by a small germ, a clogged artery, or any number of biological accidents. But if we look at the soul of man, if we look past the biological façade, we can see that one individual soul is a universe, a universe of infinite wonder and spiritual grandeur, if that individual soul is connected to the heart of God. The truly great man is great because of what he loves. Those Europeans who love their God in and through their people are the “heroic brood” of God’s creation and they will fight this battle, begun by Satan, out to the end, in defiance of the white-hating, perfumed clerics, the liberal powers that be, and the murderous barbarian hordes of color.+

Posted in Halfway-house churches, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on Clerical Devils

The Evening Mists of Europe

Posted on July 6, 2013 by cwny

My lips smile no more, my heart loses its lightness;
No dream of the future my spirit can cheer.
I only can brood on the past and its brightness
The dear ones I long for again gather here.
From ev’ry dark nook they press forward to meet me;
I lift up my eyes to the broad leafy dome,
And others are there, looking downward to greet me
The ash grove, the ash grove, again is my home.

– Welsh Hymn

__________

In an old Huckleberry Hound cartoon, a potato rises up from a huge potato field and addresses his fellow potatoes: “Potatoes, arise! No more will we stand for being boiled, mashed and French-fried. We shall attack and win, win, win!” But the potatoes just sit there. The heroic potato is then forced to go it alone and eventually is defeated by the bumbling Huckleberry Hound. 

I suppose we can forgive the potatoes, because – after all – they were just potatoes. But what are we to say of the white grazers who seem to resemble potatoes, except for the fact that potatoes don’t watch football games and NASCAR on television? Why don’t the grazers have any more concern for their people than the potatoes had for their fellow potatoes? Is the white race simply a cowardly race? I don’t think we can say that is true if we look at the white man’s history. In the distant past there is Alfred and Wallace and in the not-too-distant past there is Havelock and Lee. Those men were the best of the breed, but they were not isolated spores: they represented a whole host of men who fought courageously for kith and kin. And our modern age is not without white men who will fight. They will fight for democracy, for the negro, and for capitalism, but they will not fight for their people, which makes them cowards in the traditional sense of the word, so we must ask why a race of men who were not cowards in the past have become cowards. 

The neopagans tell us that white people have become cowards because of Christianity, that Christianity makes men passive and indifferent to the slaughter of their own people. When you point out to the neopagans that Europeans ruled the world during their Christian era and they hardly seemed passive or indifferent to the plight of their own people, the neopagan will inform you that the European people were not Christian during the Christian era (480 – 1914). The late Samuel Francis was a proponent of that revisionist history. He claimed that the Christianity practiced by the Europeans was an invention of their own. The real Christianity was the modern Christianity of the liberals and the modern evangelical and Roman Catholic churches. That’s a balancing act that won’t balance. How can you claim respect for your people if you believe they were deceived by a lie and they perpetuated that lie for approximately 1,430 years? If a man tells me that the passionate love of my life is a lie, I certainly won’t consider that man my friend. And the passionate love of the antique Europeans was Jesus Christ. The liberals, the modern church men, and the neopagans are all committed to a future without the Christ of the antique Europeans. We feel as Shakespeare felt:

“They that do change old love for new – Pray gods they change for worse.”

The liberal trumps the modern church men and the neopagan because he has a passionate faith: he believes in the divinity of the negro, the semi-divinity of the other colored races, and the evil of the white man. The church men have a derivative faith. They ape the liberals’ faith in the negro by throwing the Europeans of the past, and the South African and Rhodesian whites of the present, into the racist fire, but a faith that is wholly based on “what will make the liberals like me?” is not a passionate faith. And just as Chaucer’s monk believed in “hard riding’ so does the neopagan believe in “hard thinking.” He won’t inspire the grazers to stand up and fight by invoking their European ancestors: oh no, he will teach them to be clear-thinking rationalists, men who are too smart to fall for the liberals’ gibberish or the poetical Christian gibberish of the antique Europeans. But that hasn’t worked. The grazers remain cowards. Why? Because courage stems from passion. When you love passionately, you will fight for that which you love. The grazer doesn’t believe passionately in liberalism, neopaganism, or the modern Christ-less Christianity. He is a man without a spiritual country, a man in search of a spiritual backbone, which he can only find at his racial hearth fire, which currently lies abandoned and untended in the demonized past of the antique Christian Europeans. What if the grazer wandered away from his simulated home of the Redskins, Packers, Giants, (fill in the blank), and because of some vague, spiritual restlessness went back to the haunts of his European youth? Maybe, like Pip, he would find the love of his youth:

Nevertheless, I knew, while I said those words, that I secretly intended to revisit the site of the old house that evening, alone, for her sake. Yes, even so. For Estella’s sake.

…There was no house now, no brewery, no building whatever left, but the wall of the old garden. The cleared space had been enclosed with a rough fence, and looking over it, I saw that some of the old ivy had struck root anew, and was growing green on low quiet mounds of ruin. A gate in the fence standing ajar, I pushed it open, and went in.

A cold silvery mist had veiled the afternoon, and the moon was not yet up to scatter it. But, the stars were shining beyond the mist, and the moon was coming, and the evening was not dark. I could trace out where every part of the old house had been, and where the brewery had been, and where the gates, and where the casks. I had done so, and was looking along the desolate garden walk, when I beheld a solitary figure in it.

The figure showed itself aware of me, as I advanced. It had been moving towards me, but it stood still. As I drew nearer, I saw it to be the figure of a woman. As I drew nearer yet, it was about to turn away, when it stopped, and let me come up with it. Then, it faltered, as if much surprised, and uttered my name, and I cried out,—”Estella!”

…I took her hand in mine, and we went out of the ruined place; and, as the morning mists had risen long ago when I first left the forge, so the evening mists were rising now, and in all the broad expanse of tranquil light they showed to me, I saw no shadow of another parting from her. 

No dream of the future, whether one of a multi-racial Babylon, a multi-religious church-centered world, or a world ruled by white intelligence, can compare with old Europe. If once the grazer pauses there for a moment and lets the mists of Christian Europe envelope him, he will become a man again, and the day of the cowardly European will end. 

The hue and cry for the death of the Europeans does not just come from the hardcore liberals and the colored barbarians. It also comes from a new breed of Christian conservatives. They cite the decadence of white culture and preach a Christian renewal via the colored races. There are three fallacies contained in that contemptible philosophy of betrayal. First, your people are your own, for good or ill, and you cannot abandon them for another people.

Secondly, the white grazers, even in their fallen state, are better than the colored barbarians. They maintain a remnant of grace from the Corinthians 13 civilization of old Europe that the colored barbarians have never shown, even at the zenith of their anti-civilizations. Yes, I am prejudiced; I speak from the depths of a prejudiced European heart that loves the European people and hates their enemies. 

Thirdly, the Christian conservatives who want to replace the white grazers with colored people never look at those marvelous colored replacements with an objective eye. They are not noble savages; quite the contrary is the case: they are ignoble savages addicted to theft, murder, and rapine. And why, if they are against white decadence, do the ‘Christian conservatives’ court favor with the most decadent branch of the white race, the white-hating liberals? So, none of the white-hating propaganda will wash. There is no excuse for it, and it behooves every white man to do what he can to send the white-hating liberals, their anti-Christian Christian adjuncts, and the colored barbarians a clear message that any attack on white people will be answered in kind. 

Currently the silence of the white man, in the face of white genocide is deafening. And the silence will remain hanging over the white grazers like a shroud until their passion is aroused. Until that time liberals will keep the grazers grazing with the same gambit the English Jacobins used on their people to keep them from opposing the French Revolution: “Those are bad aristocrats who are being beheaded. You have nothing to worry about unless you take their part.” The dynamic never changes: “Those southern racists, those South African racists, etc., were and are bad people. You have nothing to worry about unless you become like unto them.” But we are like unto them: they are our people. Putting aside the pragmatic reason that contrary to what the liberals say (they will kill all whites whether they renounce South African whites or not), we should rush to the defense of our white brethren because that charity of honor demands that we do so. For how long will the white grazer be content to offer his fellow whites up for sacrifice? Just as long as he grazes in the fields of Liberaldom, isolated from his past, his people, and his God. 

After World War I the conservative European was on the defensive. And by conservative, I mean, in the true sense, the European who wanted to conserve Christian Europe. It was never stated explicitly, but the general feeling among Europeans seemed to be, “It’s best that we leave that Christian stuff, that poetical whimsy, in the nursery, and proceed into the new world of iron and steel with concrete, iron, and steel economies and concrete, iron, and steel philosophies.” The better part that Mary chose, the poetic of the Christ story, was abandoned. The faith that ruled Europe became an incidental. It survived for a time as whimsy, in the novels of Kenneth Grahame and C. S. Lewis and in the movies of Walt Disney, and then faded out of the living memory of white people born in the latter half of the 20th century. What has replaced the poetic of Christian Europe? The poetic of the noble black savage, which the liberals push with a proselytizing spirit that knows no bounds. They will kill all non-adherents to their religion without any compunctious visitings of nature in their hearts, because they have hardened their hearts against the light of the world. And so long as the white grazer is separated from bardic Europe by an iron and steel curtain more formidable than the old Soviet Iron Curtain, he will be unable to resist the liberals, who are filled with passionate intensity, or the colored barbarians. 

When the steel and iron curtain of pragmatism went up and what was considered as non-essential was left behind, the white man lost chivalry, heroism, charity, and vision. Quite a high price to pay for technological mastery of the world. The white man achieved technological superiority, but he lost his soul. The liberal compensated for his loss by consecrating his technology to his new black god whom he loves with his whole heart, mind, and soul. But what of the white grazer? He doesn’t love the noble black savage enough to make him his god, but he needs a god that he can love with a passionate intensity. Can blood sports fill that need? I doubt it. What if a God-man came along who was crucified, died and was buried, but then rose from the dead on the third day? Would that event fill the grazers with the passionate intensity necessary to defend and fight for their own people, the people that bore the God-man on their shoulders when He was just an infant? Yes, it would, but to hear that sacred story, the grazer would have to return to the European nursery where the discarded poetic of Europe lies in a dustbin. Oh, what a falling off was there! 

A friend of mine, a lover of Christian Europe, recently told me that she didn’t see any hope for white people. All she saw around her indicated that the whites would be massacred to the last man, woman, and child with the full consent of the liberals, until they too faced the death they had planned for other ‘bad’ whites. (It is always the bad whites, those racist whites, whom the liberals envision dying.) It’s difficult to offer words of comfort to a Christian European woman. You don’t want to lie: things are that bad and it does seem like the white race is hurtling toward total annihilation. I try to follow Edgar’s advice: “Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say.” Despite the fact that the grazers seem as soul-dead as the potatoes in the Huckleberry Hound cartoon, despite the liberals’ complete control of the media, the churches, and the schools, and despite the overwhelming mass of colored barbarians who seek the white man’s blood, I don’t see Christian Europe and her people perishing. My heart is still in that European nursery where all the fairy tales are true, because they are connected to Him, who assures us that nothing eternal dies. The passionate intensity of one heart connected to His Europe can still turn the tide. And I know there is more than one such heart.  God works from the few to the many. Better to be a European, a Christ-bearer, than a rivet in Sandburg’s skyscraper, or a cog in the liberals’ satanic mills.

“Since no man has aught of what he leaves, what is’t to leave betimes?” +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Christianity: Neither a Theory Nor a Philosophy, Grazers, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Evening Mists of Europe

The Return Home

Posted on June 29, 2013 by cwny

There, then, a while in chains we lay,
In wintry dungeons, far from day;
But ris’n at length, with might and main,
Our iron fetters burst in twain.

-R. L. Stevenson

__________

The Swedish police response to the ongoing Moslem riots in their nation was what I would term malicious indifference. The police declared that they were not going to do anything to stop the riots, but they would move against any “right wing extremists” who tried to stop the rioters from murdering, raping, and plundering. And there were some young Swedish males (God bless them) who did walk the streets, defying the police order, in an attempt to protect their women folk. Some wore masks, which is a good idea. Why make it easy for the liberals to identify their enemies? I like the idea of masked white avengers roaming the streets at night and then behaving like normal, cowed citizens during the day. The time has passed for public demonstrations and petitions. The liberals love such public protests, because it gives them an opportunity to identify their enemies and deal with them accordingly. We, the white Europeans, are a captive people. We should not accept our conquered status as our permanent condition, but acknowledging that reality will make us masked avengers instead of ineffectual petitioners.

The basic premise of the liberals, which keeps them in power, is that democracy is the moral equivalent of God. Whatever is done by democratically elected leaders is good, because… well, because democracy is good: anyone can see that. The collective will of the people, which is always the will of a tiny minority who can manipulate the will of the people, holds sway with a despotic power greater than any divine right monarch or chieftain of a clan ever had. All democracies are divine because the will of the people is divine. Starting with the French Revolution and proceeding from there to all the European nations, we have seen that in a democratic nation, in which “the people” rule, everyone is not considered part of the glorious collective called “the people.” In France, the royal family and the aristocrats were the non-people who had to be exterminated so that “the people” could live. In subsequent years, as the democratic poison was allowed to course through the veins of the European nations, white people from all social and economic classes became non-humans, who had to be exterminated in order to make room for the colored people of the earth.

It is futile for white people to jockey for position within the democracies of the west, because white people are a non-people when they petition for their rights as a people, and they are an evil people, not fit to live, when the liberals need an evil devil to blame for the ills of the world. There is a group of black barbarians, based in New York City, who call themselves Black Hebrew Israelites. They perform a religious ritual in which white women kneel before them and kiss their feet in atonement for white people’s sin of racism. It occurred to me when I saw that obscene and blasphemous ceremony that nothing could better illustrate the current spirit of white people and the eternal spirit of the black savage. White people have denied the original sin, which the God of Christians says we all shared in, and transformed all sin and guilt to the “racist” white race. In contrast the black savage, who never did understand Christianity at the deepest level, knows only one thing: “The white man is weak and we can dominate him.” And everything that perpetuates or supports democracy perpetuates and supports such moral pariahs as the Black Hebrew Israelites and their white devotees.

We must see what a democracy is in reality, not what it is in theory. In theory a democracy is government by the people and for the people. In reality, a democracy is government by the few for a select minority of people. We can see the democratic phenomenon in all its glory if we look at the primary issue of the latter half of the 20th century: the unchecked immigration of the coloreds into European nations. In every European nation, if the European people had been asked to vote on the issue of colored immigration do you think they would have voted to be displaced? Of course not, so a vote was never taken. Liberal oligarchies only allow voting when they are sure of victory. Legalized abortion was not voted on until it had been institutionalized for over 25 years. And the destruction of the white race will not be voted on until the white race is destroyed. Then a few remaining liberals and the savage colored hordes will vote for what has already taken place, the destruction of the white man.

All seems cheerless, dark, and deadly for the white man. Determined bands of liberals, committed to the rule of Satan, rule in every European nation. And they keep their kingdom in order by a two-pronged system of terror. On the one hand, there is the law. All opposition to multi-cultural, diverse, white-hating Liberaldom will be opposed with the usual weapons of lawful persecution, such as fines, taxes, and imprisonment. And the second prong of the liberals’ attack is malicious indifference to the bloodletting of the colored barbarians. Some governments will feign concern over the murder of whites, and some governments such as the Swedish government will say it outright: “We don’t care.” But all the liberal governments throughout the European nations encourage and support the colored savages’ ongoing war against the white race.

White people are at the mercy of liberals and the colored barbarians who have no mercy. They are at the mercy of the former because the liberals have rejected the God of mercy, and the latter because the colored tribesmen never knew the God of mercy. What should the white man do in the face of such merciless foes? Should he vote them away? How can he do that since all voting is done within the satanic confines of democracy? Shall he plead with the liberals and the colored barbarians to let him live? Such pleading is doomed to fail. Why would a people without mercy listen to the pleas of a defeated foe? It seems like last post. But there is one last hope, which really was always our only hope. The European people conquered the world when they sought first the kingdom of heaven. That is the conundrum the European faces. He can’t defeat the forces of liberalism and colored barbarism, the forces of ‘this world only,’ unless he believes that Christ is the Son of God, who is a greater force than this world only.

The European cannot mount a charge against his liberal and colored enemies armed with a materialist philosophy or an intellectual affirmation of milk-toast multi-cultural, democratic Christianity. He must have that passionate bred-in-the-bone and in the heart Christianity which breeds men and women whose faith can move mountains, destroy liberalism, and defeat the colored hordes in the day of battle.

To be a true European a man must break the chains of democracy. He must cease to feel, think, and act like a modern devotee of democracy, diversity, and equality. The internal battle comes first. Louis XVI did not defend himself and his family against the forces of Jacobin democracy because he had doubts about the legitimacy of a Christian monarchy. He was willing to consider, just for a faltering moment, that Satanism might have some value for modern men. The result of such a faltering consideration of the merits of Satanism was the death of all Louis was supposed to protect and defend. We too, we Europeans, have witnessed the death of all we were pledged to protect and defend: our people and the sacred faith of our European ancestors. At the very least we can make the liberals and their barbarian allies know that amongst the seemingly cowed and frightened white men they see by day, there are masked midnight raiders who will never abandon sacred Europe for democratic Satania.

In his autobiography, the marvelous humorist and post-Civil War chronicler of the Southern people Irwin Cobb stated that he thought the teachings of the New Testament were sublime but undoubtedly a very impractical guide for living in this very hard, practical world. Minus the admiration for the sublime teaching of the New Testament, Cobb’s opinion of Christ’s teachings is the opinion of the white nationalists who have been advocating more democracy and more secularized pragmatism as a solution to white genocide. They have refused to come to terms with the satanic nature of liberalism because then they would have to acknowledge that Satan’s divine antagonist, Jesus Christ, is the only genuinely pragmatic answer to the seemingly hopeless plight of the white nations. “I’m not interested in metaphysical bull—,” the white nationalist intones. Maybe you should be, because that is what distinguishes the true white man from the colored barbarian: he has a passion for the “impractical” things of the spirit while the colored tribesmen seek the fleshpots of Egypt. I think the white nationalists’ obsession with the Jew as the only enemy of the white race, while they often ignore the white, post-Christian liberal, stems from their desire to have one easily identifiable material symbol of the enemy. But that ignores the reality that is staring us in the face: most Jews are liberals, but not all liberals are Jews. It is liberalism, the liberalism of Rousseau, of Voltaire, of Descartes, and a whole legion of anti-Christian Christians, as well as the Jews, against whom we are fighting. The key element in liberalism is a hatred of Christ and those who believe in Christ. The reason the white nationalists are always seeking for some kind of compromise with the democratic liberals is because they are of the same opinion as the liberals regarding the central event of history. They believe that Christ be not risen. And if you don’t believe Christ rose from the dead, you can never march into a European future while holding on to the threads of the past, because the past, in Europe, belongs to those who believed in Christ. The liberals are simply more consistent than the white nationalists. Since Christ be not risen, the white Europeans have perpetuated a falsehood on mankind. They don’t deserve to live in the future. So say the liberals. The white nationalists agree that Christ be not risen, but they want to be forgiven for the Christianity of their ancestors and accepted in Babylon on the basis of their intelligent genes. Hence their unwillingness to give up on democracy. They are always hoping that they can win the liberals over by intelligent pleading.

There is a second way of dealing with liberals, which I feel is the only way to deal with them. We should not reason with them: they are not interested in rational debate once they have ascended to power. When a liberal is outside the power structures he wants to discuss everything. “Why not legalize abortion?” “What’s wrong with gay marriage?” “What’s wrong with mixed marriages?” But once in power, all discussion ends, and the liberal feels called upon to defend not debate. He is a spiritualized Jew who has hardened his heart against the light:

I pray you, think you question with the Jew:
You may as well go stand upon the beach
And bid the main flood bate his usual height;
You may as well use question with the wolf
Why he hath made the ewe bleat for the lamb;
You may as well forbid the mountain pines
To wag their high tops and to make no noise,
When they are fretten with the gusts of heaven;
You may as well do anything most hard,
As seek to soften that–than which what’s harder?–
His Jewish heart:

This brings us to the second way. The one last and only hope for the white man. We can let go of the democratic, technological white man who is the pushy, nouveau riche fellow who comes to dinner at the old patriarchal estate and attempts to win the daughter of the patriarch by flash, glitter, and the promise of a golden future. But neither the patriarch nor his daughter is impressed. “Who are your people, where do you come from?” they ask. The nouveau riche fellow doesn’t think that is important.

“It is important,” the patriarch declares, as he pushes Mr. Nouveau Riche out the door.

The threads of the past! There are two Europes. There is storybook Europe, where white people dwell, people who cherish their own in the sight of Christ, true God and true man. And there is democratic, technological, race-mixing Europe, where the liberals, the colored barbarians, and all those who hate the light dwell. If we pick up the discarded sacred thread of our storybook past, we will not immediately end our Babylonian captivity. But we will have begun the battle, the only battle that ennobles a man rather than debases him. And when we triumph, all honor and glory will go to Him, the creator and inspiration of our dear land of storybooks. +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Democracy, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on The Return Home

Rivers of Blood

Posted on June 22, 2013 by cwny

Lead, lead. The time seems long: their blood thinks scorn,
Till it fly out and show them princes born.

–Shakespeare’s Cymbeline

__________

Lord Mandelson, a former Cabinet Minister in the Blair and Brown administrations, recently announced that the Labor Party had actively recruited foreign colored immigrants (about 2.2 million) between the years 1997 and 2010. Although Mandelson conceded that the colored immigrants replaced white native-born Brits in the labor force, he didn’t seem the least bit repentant for his role in the displacement of white Britains. In point of fact he considered it a badge of honor.

Mandelson’s announcement was certainly no surprise. He was just telling us something that we already know. The ruling elites in the European nations have been replacing their own people with colored people for the past 45 years. My own anti-nation started the process in 1965. What is significant about Mandelson’s statement is that it marks a shift in the liberals’ mindset. From the sixties through the nineties they took some care not to be too blatant about their master plan to destroy the white race. Instead of destruction and genocide the liberals used words such as ‘equality’ and ‘diversity.’ And they still use such words, because there are still white grazers who are taken in by them. But there are more and more liberals, particularly in Canada and the United States, who are willing to state, quite openly, that whites must become extinct and be the prime exponents of their own extinction. Canada, for instance, has a whole host of public service jobs for which whites are ineligible. And in the anti-European land mass called the United States, Jeb Bush, the governor of multi-cultural Florida, has stated that Mexican immigrants make better citizens than white Americans. Of course, if Jeb Bush had one ounce of royal European blood life in his veins he would realize, as Kipling so eloquently tells us in his poem “The Stranger,” that it is not a question of which race is better: it is about loyalty to one’s own, who are one’s own because God ordained it. The Jeb Bushes of the world first go whoring after the stranger and then try to make a virtue of their sin by deifying the colored races and demonizing the white race. It’s all the rage in Evangelical circles to adopt colored children and marry one’s white offspring off to the colored barbarians, all in the name of Christianity. Such blasphemies are not new and original, or virtuous; they are sin disguised as virtue.

So may the outward shows be least themselves;
The world is still deceiv’d with ornament.
In law, what plea so tainted and corrupt.
But, being season’d with a gracious voice,
Obscures the show of evil? In religion
What dammed error but some sober brow
Will bless it and approve it with a text,
Hiding the grossness with fair ornament?

The Christian wing of liberalism, which is not Christian, still prefers to season their race-mixing with a gracious voice and a quote from Scripture while the Lord Mandelson type liberals consider the battle won, thus making gracious subterfuge unnecessary.

Let us put their modern attack on white people in its proper context. The devil, as Burke correctly points out, was the first liberal. So it follows – and the Europeans’ history bears this out – that liberals will always try to attack individual Christians and cultures based on Christianity. Up until the time of the French Revolution there were liberals outside the existing power structures of Europe, but there were no nations of Europe who had institutionalized liberalism, which is another name for Satanism. After the French Revolution the European nations gradually caved into liberalism. By the middle of the 1960s all the nations governed by Europeans had institutionalized liberalism. At that time the European powers began the mass extermination of the white race. Countries like South Africa and Rhodesia became black states sooner than the other European countries because those countries already had large concentrations of blacks in them when the extermination process began. But all the European nations will eventually – unless white people decide to act like Christian Europeans – become carbon copies of South Africa and Rhodesia where small concentrations of white people live in impoverished ghettoes devoid of all the necessities of life.

Once you separate all the gracious subterfuge from liberalism and see that it is the second oldest faith, faith in Satan rather than in Christ, you will see why the liberals must deify the colored savage and demonize the white man. Christ was embodied in the culture of the antique white Europeans because their culture was an expression of the faith that was in them. So long as one white person remains on earth, there will be some visible reminder that the Word took flesh and dwelt among us. On some level the European-hating white “Christians” understand this, which is why they are trying desperately to survive the white holocaust by becoming negroes: by adopting colored children, taking colored spouses, and making the negro the supreme god, while making Christ a subordinate god, in the once-Christian churches. It is indeed a second fall of man, the liberals’ betrayal of their own people at the behest of Satan. “I want to have nothing to do with the Christ-bearing race,” Satan commands. “Yes, master,” answer the liberals of Church and State.

The United States was a leader in the European rush to the racial abyss, because the United States already had large colored populations in the 1960s. But the other European countries followed suit. Enoch Powell’s “The Rivers of Blood” speech, which he made on April 20, 1968 at the annual meeting of the West Midlands Conservative Political Centre in Birmingham has turned out to be all too true.

For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organize to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding.

Like the Roman, I seem to see ‘the River Tiber foaming with much blood’. That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.

Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.

Of course resolute and urgent action was not taken in Britain or in any other European nation. The blood red tide of colored savages is sweeping over the European nations, and what were once white Christian nations have became colored nations dedicated to heathen gods. Now, even if the European borders were to be completely closed to colored immigration, there are already too many colored people in the once-white nations. It is no longer a case of keeping the colored invaders out, it is a case of reconquering Europe and driving the conquering armies of colored barbarians back into the sea. Such a daunting task is not possible from the modern, materialist standpoint; however, it is possible from an older European standpoint. Let’s take Enoch Powell’s “River of Blood” analogy. Everything he predicted – and Anthony Jacob as well – has come true. A river of blood has overwhelmed the European people and the river seems to be forever increasing in breadth and intensity. How, in the natural course of events, can we expect to stop such a rushing torrent? We can’t, in the natural course of events. We who are about to die need a miracle. And miracles only occur when a people puts themselves in the hands of God. Do you remember Moses and the Red Sea? Was that just a fairy tale? Yes, it was a fairy tale – a true fairy tale. The history of the European people, prior to their apostasy in the 20th century, was also a true fairy tale, no less of a miracle than the parting of the Red Sea. But there must be an internal conversion before the Europeans can witness the miracle of a river of blood flowing away rather than through Europe’s green and pleasant land. I know that to talk of such a miracle when the colored hordes appear to be overwhelming Europe seems absurd. But isn’t that God’s test? Our people, The Europeans, once stood in the midst of a hostile heathen world and got on their knees and said, “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.” The obstacles they faced then were greater than the obstacles we face now. The crucial difference is that the modern Europeans do not pray, “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done,” they pray to a ‘system’: “My democratic, capitalist system,” “My democratic, socialist system,” “My Thomist system…” God’s grace cannot be seen at the precise moment it is vouchsafed to mortal men, but surely if we look back at the Europeans’ history we can see it was European men and women who sought first and foremost His Kingdom Come that made wherever the European people settled a blessed plot of earth.

All the blessed European plots of earth have been defiled by colored barbarians because of the great betrayal of liberals. When looking at the older generation, those past sixty years-of-age, there is nothing to be said of them. They were alive when there was still something left of Europe, and they rejected their own people for the colored hordes. The younger generation, in large part, has never known old Europe. They only know what the white-hating liberals have told them about it. So the white women seek to merge with the colored races, and the white males seek oblivion. This is why it is imperative the European hero should present a different Europe to the lost and discarded white males. It is like unto the old stories when the old man of the woods calls the two young princes from their chores, bids them sit down, and then tells them of their royal past and their future: “Though I have raised you as my sons and loved you as my own, I am not your true father. Your father was King of the European people. When Mordred the liberal treacherously killed your father and took control of the kingdom, he wanted the blood not only of your father but also of your father’s heirs. So I took you from the palace that very night to these woods where I have raised you as my own. But the time has come for you to fulfill your royal destiny. Your blood speaks to you, your father calls out to you from the grave. Go and wrest the kingdom from Mordred and his heathen armies. Go amongst them in disguise at first, but when you have gathered other strong arms and stout hearts to your cause, strike with all your might and fulfill your destiny.”

That is the crux of the matter. The liberals in churchand state stand in defiance of God’s will. He did not ordain that the Christ-bearing people should abdicate their responsibility and seek to replace Christ with the negro and the other tribes of color. The work of the European hero is the work of internal defiance. He must do the work and become a man of old Europe so that he can enkindle a flame in the hearts of the seemingly dead-to-life European grazers, for once a man sees and feels the love that once was there he will never again belong to the liberals nor seek oblivion in the dark caverns of Babylon. To fight for that dear land in which that charity of honor, the honor of Christ, was a living reality is the way of salvation for the white man and his people. Once united to that Europe and those people, a man need never fear the terror of the liberal storm troopers in church and state, nor the arrows of the colored barbarians. We, the Europeans, once called on Him by name, and He delivered us from the pestilence that walketh in darkness and the destruction that wasteth at noonday. Through our devotion to our people, we came to know His name, and He set His people on high. This is not a minor quarrel we have with the liberals and the colored barbarians. They are committed to build hell on earth with Satan’s help. We are committed to His will be done on earth as it is heaven. But we must see the conflict as a conflict between God’s people and Satan’s own. We want to conserve our people and our God, and not some system, be it monetary, philosophical, or theological. The battle is personal and it is to the knife. As Kipling said of Queen Victoria after an attempt to assassinate her in 1882 failed, so do we say of our people and Christ’s Europe:

Trust us if need arise,
O Queen,
We shall not tarry with the blow!

The need has arisen. +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Defense of the White Race, Liberalism, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Tagged , | Comments Off on Rivers of Blood