The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound; To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn. Isaiah 61: 1-2
In the 1700s, Burke warned the European people that they were spending, in their passion for liberty, equality, and fraternity, the “unbought grace of life.” In 1950, Herbert Butterfield stated that the European people were living off of the fumes of Christianity. Now what is left to us? There is nothing left to us from that culture of God’s grace. What started out as a small cabal of demonic creatures called liberals became a large, militant army that purged the unbought grace of life from the hearts of the European people. Nothing good will follow in the European drama without the unbought grace of life that we have cast aside.
Liberalism, like Christianity, is a revelatory faith; it is not a philosophy. When you try to make it a philosophy, you kill it. Even though the liberals profess to be adherents of pure reason, reason is only the first person of their trinity. They must be true to their inner dynamic, to their mystical core, which is the sacred negro, if they want to maintain their faith. The advocates of pure reason without reference to the sacred negro within the boundaries of Liberaldom are like unto the scholastics within the bowels of Christendom. They are harmful parasites because they seek to pluck out the mystery which sustains the faithful; in the case of liberalism – the mystery of the Man-God, the Sacred Negro, and in the case of Christianity, the scholastics seek to pluck out the mystery of the God-Man, Jesus Christ.
We must go back in time and see with the inner eye – with that eye we see the failure of Greek rationalism. It was the mystery religions that had captured the hearts of the people at the time that Christ entered human history. He did not defeat Mithras and Cybele because He offered mankind a rational alternative to the irrationality of the mystery religions. Oh no! He revealed, in His divine humanity, a mystery greater than Mithras and Cybele, He revealed to us God in Man and Man in God. Christ’s triumph was not a triumph of reason over unreason, it was a triumph of charity over the ecstasy of cruelty and unbridled sexual license.
Liberalism represents the return of the mystery religions, through the sacred negro. The liberals, in their mystery religion, worship cruelty and sexual license; they cannot be reasoned out of their religion. They have rejected the Light of the World; all things are lawful once that rejection becomes your religion. “No light reaches eyes which regard blindness as clearsightedness; no remorse affects a soul which erects barbarism into patriotism, and which sanctions murder with duty.” (Taine)
In 2016, when the liberals were taken by surprise by Trump’s victory, they revealed, without the usual subterfuges, the essence of their faith. They openly, through Black Lives Matter and Antifa, and through the COVID-19 virus, sanctioned the murder of whites. And they were unopposed. They successfully painted Trump as a real mean man who was opposed to the light of liberalism, but he was no such man. Trump was and is a liberal who wants to reinstate a few Christian fumes into the body of liberalism. That might have been possible in 1960, but not now. Satan goes forward; he does not go back. The moderate liberals have latched onto an auxiliary doctrine of liberalism, which is demon-cracy, and made it the sum total of their religious faith. That is why they continue to blather on about voting the scoundrels out, even after the scoundrels have shown they do not believe in ‘one man, one vote’ democracy. They believe that a vote that does not serve mad-dog liberalism is not a vote. The mad-dog liberals adhere to the satanic essence of their faith; they will not be deterred by outward forms. They will use the Constitution and the demon-cratic process only so long as they serve their faith; when such outward forms no longer serve their faith, they will discard those forms. Obama’s election was allowed to take place because his election served liberalism. Trump’s election did not serve liberalism, so he was barred from being re-elected. That is always the way it shall be in Liberaldom. The liberals’ revelatory faith is directly opposed to the Christian faith. The two entities cannot peacefully co-exist. When conservatives turn all their faces away from the January 6th protestors, when they bid us recite the litany, “We are not racist, we are non-violent,” they bid us accept the rule of the liberals and their satanic gods in perpetuity.
Do the moderate liberals, the News Max type of conservatives, really oppose liberalism? They differ with the liberals on many issues, but do they oppose the onward march toward Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth? No, they do not. Where your treasure lies, so lies your heart. If a gang of murdering barbarians attack my house, seeking to put my family to the sword, and my neighbors say, “We are against robbery and murder, but we will not fight against robbers and murderers. We will wait until an election comes up, and we will vote against robbers and murderers, and we will abide by the elections’ results, even though the robbers and murderers are the people counting the ballots,” then I know what my neighbors are – they are moderate liberals who “may be used for wrong, but are useless for right.”
It’s a truly disgusting spectacle to see ‘conservatives’ continuing to dialogue with their liberal brethren who are feasting on the blood of white people. By the rules of the conservatives’ blasphemous, demon-cratic religion — that what is right is determined by a majority vote — the liberals do not have a right to rule, but still the conservatives continue to conserve demon-cracy and condemn all those who oppose demon-cracy. Burke refused to recognize the regicide Jacobins as the legitimate rulers of France. We should also refuse to recognize the regicide liberals as the legitimate rulers of our nation.
Nation is a moral essence, not a geographical arrangement, or a denomination of the nomenclator. France, though out of her territorial possession, exists; because the sole possible claimant, I mean the proprietary, and the Government to which the proprietary adheres, exists and claims. God forbid, that if you were expelled from your house by ruffians and assassins, that I should call the material walls, doors and windows of __________, the ancient and honourable family of __________. Am I to transfer to the intruders, who not content to turn you out naked to the world, would rob you of your very name, all the esteem and respect I owe to you? The Regicides in France are not France. France is out of her bounds, but the kingdom is the same…
This example we shall give, if, instead of adhering to our fellows in a cause which is an honour to us all, we abandon the lawful Government and lawful corporate body of France, to hunt for a shameful and ruinous fraternity with this odious usurpation that disgraces civilized society and the human race. –Letters on a Regicide Peace
Even if Biden had won the majority of votes in a fair election as Obama did, the election would have been an invalid election. All American elections are invalid for the same reason that there are no valid elections in France or in any of the European countries. They are invalid because democracy is demon-cracy; it is from hell. The liberals hold that any government that is not a demon-cracy is not a legitimate government, but the exact opposite is the case. No government that is not grounded in pietas, which is part of the “unbought grace of life,” is a valid government. All the nations of Europe were once grounded in pietas, and our own anti-nation once had a small European remnant that took their stand against the liberal leviathan in the name of pietas—the love of their own in and through the Savior.
I suppose now that typewriters have gone the way of the horse and buggy, the phrase, “he didn’t adjust the typewriter,” has gone out of our vernacular language. But I still use the term to describe my failure to adjust to the changing times. I have failed to adjust the typewriter during the transfer from the ‘fumes of Christianity’ culture in which I grew up to the ‘death of the fumes of Christianity’ culture and the institutionalization of Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth. In the ‘fumes’ culture of the 1950s and 1960s, liberals were not as blatant about their intent to destroy every last remnant of white Christian Europe. But as the fumes died out, the liberals dispensed with their subterfuges because they no longer feared any opposition to liberalism. All resistance to liberalism has ceased; that was made abundantly clear when the conservatives accepted the verdict of the fraudulent election. It’s difficult to comprehend, to adjust the typewriter, but that is the current state of the European people: they have been desouled by the ‘image of the beast in man’ culture of liberalism.
The greatest danger to the European people is not the mad-dog liberals, it is the moderate liberals in church and state. And by greatest danger, I do not mean that the moderate liberals – the conservatives – are as morally reprehensible as the mad-dog liberals. Far from it, the moderate liberals are not, as the mad-dog liberals are, outside the ken of humanity, they have many humane and noble instincts. But that is why they are so dangerous. They mix some Christian fumes into their liberalism, and we are tempted, because we are lonely, to settle for their moderate liberalism. But the Dream of the Rood Christians ultimately must recoil in horror from the moderate liberals just as we would recoil in horror from a reptile lover who tells us we can sleep with venomous, poisonous snakes without being bitten. The dialogues with liberals, the great talk shows, are predicated on the assumption that we can all be snake charmers, we can mesmerize deadly cobras with our incredible, superior reason. Or, to put it in Shakespearean terms, “You bid me seek redemption from the devil.”
Lincoln said it all when he made his Gettysburg address. He joined America with regicide, Jacobin France when he spoke of a nation, “conceived in liberty” (liberty from God) and, “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal” (but some, the sacred negroes, are more equal than others, because such men are gods who point us to the ‘image of the beast in man’ culture of the archangel Satan). Our forefathers cannot be the men Lincoln references – the Jeffersons, the Franklins, and the Paines. Our forefathers are the men with the Dream of the Rood in their hearts; they are the antique Europeans, and they are the apostles and St. Paul, who bid us adhere to His word and keep His image, not the image of the beast in man, before our eyes.
The great enemies of Christian Europe were and are the liberals, but the liberals’ allies in the war against the ‘image of God in man’ culture takes us, at first, by surprise. The ‘Christian’ clergy have always been the enemies of the Europeans’ Dream of the Rood. Why? They have stood and still stand in opposition to Christ’s Europe because they do not believe the light of Christ’s love penetrated to the core of European culture. They believe, with St. Augustine, that there is the city of God, which consists of the structure called the Church and the parchments put out by Church officials, and there is the city of man, which is the city of sin and desolation. But doesn’t such a theology assume that God’s grace is an illusion? If Christ’s love cannot turn human hearts to Him, what are we doing here on earth? Are we only supposed to know God through the computer printouts of the clergymen? Small wonder that the liberals have triumphed over the Christian Europeans. The liberals have a savior while the European people have… What do they have? They want to cling to a few Christian fumes while maintaining a place in Liberaldom. But the liberals’ gods are jealous gods. They do not want to share their place in the liberals’ trinity with Jesus Christ. There cannot be, there must not be, two redeemers. The liberals have overmanned the conservatives because the conservatives want to serve two masters. It can’t be done. It is Christ or the negro. The liberals have taken their stand while the conservatives have taken no stand, and by taking no stand they have made their choice – they serve the sacred negro, and through the sacred negro they serve Satan. The minstrel in the old hymn asks Mary if she knows that, “When you kiss your little Baby, you kissed the face of God?” We need to ask the men with the great minds in the ranks of the clergy and the conservative pundits, “Do you know that when you reject His Europe, the people with the hearts of flesh, you reject Christ?”
A few years after I got out of college, I stopped at the house of a professor I had become friends with during my college years. During the course of our, “what have you been doing over the last few years” conversation, I mentioned that I had gone over to the ranks of the men and women he considered his enemies – the Christian Europeans. I knew that such news would not delight him, but I was very surprised at his vehemence. He eventually asked me to leave his house. Before I left, there was an exchange between the militant atheist, my former professor, and the Christian European, myself, that I shall never forget. He wanted to turn the existence of God into a philosophical debate. He brought up all the false defenses of Aslan he had heard during the course of his career, the Thomistic apologetics and other such ‘Christian’ explanations of the ways of God. I agreed with all his criticisms. And my agreement only increased his hatred. How could I agree with his refutation of Christian apologetics and still adhere to the Christian faith? I took my stand with Alyosha Karamazov and pointed to the mysterious stranger, the God-Man, Jesus Christ.
Rational, democratic man has rejected the mystery of the God-Man who promised us a different liberty, a liberty diametrically opposed to liberalism:
And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read. And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. –Luke 4: 16-19
Liberalism in all of its many guises, clerical, moderate, and mad-dog, must be rejected because it is an ideology forged by Satan to destroy Christ’s people. The unbought grace of Christ’s Europe has been spent. The fumes of Christianity have disappeared — never to return? The head says never again, but the heart seeks His Europe and only His Europe. It is the mystery of Christ’s God-Manhood that shall sustain us in our battle with the liberal leviathan. In that mystery, charity and manhood are united. What Burke called the charity of honor is what sets the European culture on a different level from all the pagan cultures and our modern satanic culture. Achilles dragged the body of Hector three times around the walls of Troy after he had triumphed over him in battle. Achilles had the honor of a pagan, but he lacked charity. Prince Hal honors his foe, the noble Hotspur, after he has defeated him in battle because he has that charity of honor. And the modern liberals? They do not have the pagan’s honor or the Christian European’s charity. They are treacherous, immoral monsters of dire cruelty and evil. It is difficult to stay united to the dead, nay, it is an impossibility if we do not love much. The charity that never faileth, the charity that the God-Man imparts to us will keep us bound to our honored dead and to the Savior who rose again on the third day. Never, never shall we forsake the Europeans’ Dream of the Rood, because that Dream is Truth, it is the vision of the Divine Charity, of the God-Man, who draws us to Him in defiance of the hell of liberalism.+