Recrossing our Spiritual Rubicon

Rembrandt. The Return of the Prodigal Son

She crept among the trees to the trunk of a tree whence she could see, beyond some intervening trees and branches, the lighted windows, both in their reality and their reflection in the water. She placed her orderly little basket at her side, and sank upon the ground, supporting herself against the tree. It brought to her mind the foot of the Cross, and she committed herself to Him who died upon it. –Our Mutual Friend

___________________

For they all saw him, and were troubled. And immediately he talked with them, and saith unto them, Be of good cheer: it is I; be not afraid. –Mark 6: 50

___________________

The lack of a Christian response to the Antifa/Black Lives Matter assault on the white race and the Demon-crats’ Covid-19 assault on the white race has supplied those who need to see before they believe a look at the state of the European people’s collective soul. Lo and behold, they have no collective soul, they have forfeited their souls to the devil and his minions

All utopian thinking is divorced from the human heart, existing only in the airy nothings of the abstract intellects of the utopians. As a result, the closer a nation gets to the implementation of utopia, the closer that nation gets to the institution of everything inhuman, cruel, and barbaric. God is humane – He comes to us through human hearts. The Christian utopians in the Church, who jettisoned the human heart because it was impure and theologically problematic and bid us turn to their utopian plans for a perfect Christian future, paved the way for the secular utopians who moved us to an even greater ‘perfection’ than the Christian utopians. The utopian churchmen look to a perfect Christianity devoid of the racist Europeans while the secular utopians look to a perfect world devoid of the racist Europeans and the Son of God. Christ the social worker can stay in our modern utopias, but He must be subordinate to the sacred negro, who is at the center of all the European utopian states. Pope Francis the blasphemer and his like-minded clerical sycophants can stay at one with the secular liberals because their ‘Christianity’ is a utopian ‘Christianity’ completely in line with the Christ-less utopias of the secular utopians. Some European nations are not as ‘advanced’ – which translates to ‘satanic’ – as the United States is, but all the European nations are moving toward democratic utopias that are in reality the incarnation of Satan.

Obviously I am generalizing when I say that the European people, as a people, have lost their collective soul. Surely there must be some European people left with souls that still live? That is my hope, or why bother writing? But we must face the reality that even if we allow for exceptions, we are still faced with the tragic reality that the majority of our people have given their souls to the devil while the rest of our people have been spiritually neutered; they haven’t the will or the heart to fight their demon-possessed countrymen. In our own nation, the anti-nation called the United States, we are about to reap what the devil has sown. We are going to see what happens when people forsake their Christian past in order to embrace a Christless future.

So let’s be clear: other white nations might not have crossed their spiritual Rubicon, they might still have many miles to go before they reach it, but in the United States we have crossed our spiritual Rubicon. We are an anti-nation that is totally in the hands of Satan and his minions. If we try to behave as if the liberals are something other than what they are – demons – we will continue to try and deal with them as if they are human beings capable of responding to existence with human sentiments and human decency. Utopians have no humanity, they have renounced everything but their own abstract intellects, which can view the suffering of mankind with complete indifference if that suffering leads to their utopian kingdom of heaven on earth, which is in reality the kingdom of hell on earth.

The alternative news sites, which report many of the various atrocities committed by the liberals in the name of their utopian kingdom, with the sacred negro at its center, are just as shocking in their opposition as the atrocities they report. The conservative and nationalist opposition to liberalism is shocking because it is completely disproportionate to the atrocities reported. The conservatives’ opposition to the liberals’ demonism is the equivalent of a man who writes a letter to his local paper as his family members are being massacred by vicious barbarians who have invaded his home. When you have crossed a spiritual Rubicon as a nation, when your rulers are demon-crats and the bulk of your people are easily manipulated by the demon-crats because they have become convinced they have no sacred heritage to defend, you cannot try to survive by democratic measures. When Satan enters the body politic, extraordinary measures, measures that come from a spirit opposed to Satan, must be used.

Let me reference the master of thrillers and high class melodramas, Edgar Wallace. In his novel The Fourth Plague (1913), he tells of two Italian brothers from the ranks of the nobility, one evil and one good. The evil brother, Festini, plans with the aid of his secret society, the Red Hand, to drop bombs containing the Bubonic Plague all over Britain in order to destroy Britain. Without revealing that Festini is his brother, the good brother goes before Parliament and tells them that the normal democratic procedures will not stop the Red Hand. The good brother asks the members of Parliament to grasp the fact that the Red Hand is pure evil and must be dealt with by taking extreme measures that fall outside the normal procedures for dealing with lesser criminals:

“I do not know,” he said, “what plans this Parliament has formed for ridding the country of so dangerous and so terrible a force. No plan,” he spoke earnestly and emphatically, and punctuated his speech with characteristic gestures, “which you may decide upon, can be effective unless it includes some system of physical extermination. I do not make myself clear, perhaps,” he said, hurriedly, “although I have a very large acquaintance with your language.” He emphasized his point with one finger on the palm of his hand. “These men are going to destroy you and your kind. Believe me, they will have no compunction; the plague will be spread throughout England unless you take the most drastic steps within the next few hours. There is no existing law on the statute books which exactly provides for the present situation. You must create a new method to deal with a new crime, and, Mr. Speaker, whatever this House does, whatever steps it takes, however dreadful may be the form of punishment which it, in its wisdom, may devise, it cannot be too drastic or too severe to deal with the type of criminal organization which the ‘Red Hand’ represents.”

In the beginning of his novel, Wallace tells us that “all the characters in the book are fictitious,” but that is no longer true. We now face real life members of the fictional Red Hand. They are called by various names – liberals, Antifa, and Black Lives Matter, but they are all completely evil. The good brother’s response to the Red Hand should be our response to the liberal/Antifa/BLM creatures from hell – “Don’t arrest them, eliminate them.” But of course it is too late for that – white Christians are on the outside of the law, and the various branches of Liberaldom feel toward us as the good brother felt about the Red Hand headed by his demonic brother: “Eliminate them.”

Burke went before the British Parliament and warned its members that the Jacobin plague was a plague like no other. And Dostoevsky went before his people and warned them that the Jacobin-Bolshevik plague would result in the death of millions. We refused to see that America was also facing a potential plague spawned by demon-possessed liberals, and now it is upon us. Let us cease the democratic platitudes and deal with the evil demons of liberalism as Christian men should deal with evil.

It would be easy to dismiss the best of the melodramatic adventure authors of the early 20th century, but authors such as Wallace, H. C. McNeile, Johston McCulley, and Sax Rohmer had something that the existentialist writers of the 20th century and the social justice authors of the 21st century lacked: they still had a Christian view of good and evil. The villains were against white Christian Europe, and the heroes defended white Christian Europe. If Christ did indeed rise from the dead, then Sax Rohmer’s novels about the evil Fu Manchu, who always wants to destroy the “white Christians” are more realistic than Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot or James Joyce’s Ulysses. But of course the great men of intellect do not believe in Christ’s resurrection from the dead. In the absence of that belief, good becomes evil and evil becomes good. Paine’s Rights of Man, in which he calls Christianity the most evil religion ever conceived, became the liberals’ Bible while Burke’s assertion that Christian Europe was our only hope, which had to be defended against the demonic Jacobins, was rejected.

When liberals rule, the humane God is discarded in favor of the inhuman god. Negro worship is the logical outcome of liberalism. Under the banner of the sacred negro, everything evil is good and everything good is evil. Small wonder that our cities are being ripped apart by anarchists and black barbarians while the police are ordered to become non-police, to “stand down” and let the sacred negroes destroy white business and kill white citizens, who are really non-citizens with no right to live in utopia. When I see the black butchers parading through the streets of our cities I see the image  Stoddard sets before our eyes in his recounting of the events of the French Revolution in San Domingo: “A young mulatto named Fifi Pariset ranged the town like a madman searching the houses to kill the little children. Many of the men and women were hewn down by sappers, who hacked off their arms and…” Why go on? Let us never forget that these massacres, this barbarism, is part and parcel of the liberals’ utopia. What we see before us – the rapes, the lootings, and the murders — are all one big liberal religious festival, except the Pelosis and the DiAngelos no longer knit while they watch the executioners, they eat ice cream and sip wine instead.

There are no provisions in our Constitution to deal with pure evil. In a democracy there is no such thing as original sin; we are all rational creatures who can work things out by appeals to reason. But what if even our reason, contra St. Thomas Aquinas, is infected with original sin? What if we can’t come to a rational agreement about what is good and what is evil? The conservative shadows of the liberals keep appealing to the liberals’ reason under the assumption that what is good is what is rational. The liberals then respond, quite rationally, with their demands: “You must die because you are white.” You see the liberals have a religion: they do believe in original sin. They believe in the original sin of whiteness, which is a sin that cannot be forgiven.

In Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing, it is the bumbling Constable Dogberry and his companions that catch the villains in the drama: “I have deceived even your very eyes. What your wisdoms could not discover, these shallow fools have brought to light…” So it is with those authors in the first part of the 20th century who tried to please their audiences with exciting ‘potboilers.’ What they brought to light, writing within the framework of a Christian worldview, was that when evil men have placed themselves beyond the ken of humanity, when they are ruled by Satan, it takes a hero, not a candidate, to destroy the evil men. Democracies do not produce Christian heroes, they produce men who, at their best, compromise with evil, and at their worst surrender to evil. Since the defeat of the South in our uncivil war, it has been one compromise with evil after another on the part of white Christians. Now the democratic charade is over. Satan has been unmasked, he was always the force behind our democratic anti-nation. Are the European-Americans too spiritually weak to fight? Yes, they are. All that the conservatives can do, citing educated secularists such as Victor Davis Hanson and Heather MacDonald, is bid us elect a candidate who will democratically oppose the demon-crats, the Antifa, and the BLM. The liberals and their minions are in our streets, they are in our homes, they have no mercy, they have no honor, and they have no charity. They have only the hatred of all things white and Christian that shall endure so long as Satan endures – until Christ returns and consigns Satan and his minions to eternal hell. Do you really think such creatures can be stopped by voting?

I know why the Breitbart conservatives and the Tucker Carlsons do not bid Christian men to rise and ride. They, like their scholastic counterparts in the Church, are uncomfortable with the heartfelt faith of the antique Europeans. It seems stupid to speak of chivalry and “that charity of honor” in a world of computers, the internet, and new technologies that demand a new language in order to talk about them. I have never learned that language. This I have learned – The modern liberals, be they demon-crats or Antifa, and the colored barbarians of Black Lives Matter are in league with the devil. They are far more evil than the worst villains in the fictional pot boilers of MacNeile, Wallace, Rohmer, and McCulley. Those authors, even with their vivid imaginations, could not conceive of creatures as totally evil as our modern liberals. Why, when the reality of the existence of original sin and the devil is so vividly revealed to us, do we look to secular remedies for that which is a crisis of faith? The devil is attacking, through his minions, the Christ-bearing race. Christ will not leave us defenseless, but He, not ‘our democratic traditions,’ must be invoked if we are going to have any success against the liberals. Must I, again, go through the litany of their cruelties? They murder babies in their mothers’ wombs, they round up the elderly and put them in “nursing homes” in order to infect them with the Covid-19 virus. And they encourage colored barbarians to murder, rape, and destroy. What is there left to say? Just this – All that we know on this earth of charity, which never faileth, and the love which passeth the understanding of the rational mind, came to us through our Christ-imbued European hearth fire. If we are ashamed of that hearth fire, or worse yet, if we demonize that hearth fire, we will stand naked and defenseless before the enemy of mankind. It is impossible for mere mortals to swim against the liberal current and recross their spiritual Rubicon, back to Christian Europe. But all things are possible through Him who saves. The history of our people, when they were a people, proves that. We were born of Christian Europe: that is our hope in this world and the next. +

Posted in Christian Europe, Jacobinism, Liberalism, Negro worship, Religion of Satan, Utopia | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Recrossing our Spiritual Rubicon

Back from the Dead

Gilbert. Lear and the Fool

LEAR: Prithee go in thyself; seek thine own ease.     
This tempest will not give me leave to ponder
On things would hurt me more. But I’ll go in.
[To the Fool] In, boy; go first.- You houseless poverty-
Nay, get thee in. I’ll pray, and then I’ll sleep. Exit [Fool].
Poor naked wretches, wheresoe’er you are,
That bide the pelting of this pitiless storm,
How shall your houseless heads and unfed sides,
Your loop’d and window’d raggedness, defend you
From seasons such as these? O, I have ta’en
Too little care of this! Take physic, pomp;
Expose thyself to feel what wretches feel,
That thou mayst shake the superflux to them
And show the heavens more just.

King Lear


Jasper was to have been tracked remorselessly to his death by the man whom he supposed he had slain. Risen from his grave, Drood was to have driven Jasper to his tomb, there to seek for the dreaded evidence of his guilt: but to find there instead, alive and implacable, the man whom he had doomed to a sudden and terrible death, and in whose dust he had come to seek for the dreaded evidence of his guilt.

–Richard A. Proctor, Watched by the Dead


That Trump has not said anything against the deification of George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter group should not surprise us. Trump never at any point in his campaign nor in his inaugural speech gave any indication he was opposed to the worship of the sacred negro. In fact, everything he said and did told us that he was one with the liberals in his worship of the sacred negro. Trump ran afoul of the mad-dog liberals because he thought then (and still thinks) a nation dedicated to the sacred negro does not have to exterminate whites. Whites should be allowed, Trump maintains, to live and work in the United States so long as they do homage to the sacred negro. That is why the liberals hate him; they want every presidential candidate to sign on to the extermination of the white race, and Trump has not done that.

Trump is the best president that white people will ever get; the rest of the Republicans who follow Trump will agree to the gradual extermination of the white race, just as their Republican predecessors such as Bush and Regan did. But Trump’s vision of whites working side by side with the negroes in an effort to maintain a nation consecrated to the negro is not compatible with the Christian faith. Such a vision, even if it were possible to bring about, is morally reprehensible because we should not bend our knee to the sacred negro. And it is not possible, even if we wanted to abandon our faith in order to be part of Liberaldom, to work side by side with the liberals and the negroes, because they believe that the white race must be eliminated. You can’t mea culpa, mea culpa your way out of the original sin of white racism. If you are white, you are guilty; you will not be forgiven your whiteness, you must die for your sin.(1)

If Trump is the best that we can elect and he is committed to the same soul-killing, blasphemous faith as the mad-dog liberals, which is the worship of the sacred negro, then everything is cheerless, dark and deadly; we are doomed. Isn’t that right? No, it is not right. We are only doomed if we stay within the prison of democracy. Whites have always been a tiny minority among the races of the world. If they have small, village-meeting type democracies within the confines of a non-democratic white government, they might not do themselves great harm. But if they make a racially diverse democracy their national system of government, they are committing suicide. Which is, of course, what whites have done. They accepted the extermination of the white race in the name of a democratic government which has placed the sacred negro at the center of our culture. Our church services, our arts, our sports, and our civic organizations are all centered on one thing – the worship of the great black gods.

Democracy is the white people’s shroud. If they accept that shroud as their destiny, if they do not tear that shroud to pieces, they will have earned the eternal night the liberals have planned for them. Christian Europe was an impossibility, yet it came into being despite its impossibility because the white Europeans who took Christ into their hearts did not live life second-hand through the demon-cratic process. They saw the divine love in Christ and they loved Him; they saw evil in those who opposed Christ’s reign of charity, and they fought that evil. They did not vote on who God was nor did they try to stop evil by dialoging with the devil.(2)

Noting remains left inside of the European people because they have answered Dostoyevsky’s question, “Can an intelligent man, a European, believe in the divinity of Christ?,” with a resounding ‘No.’ We entered the 20th century with the ‘no,’ but there still remained a great Christian ethical holdover through the first 50 years of the 20th century. The second half of the 20th century was the half-century in which the European people discarded the last remnants of the ethos that stemmed from a faith in Christ. Now, in the 21st century, we have embarked on a new journey without the Christian faith and without the ethos that came from a faith in Christ crucified, Christ risen. Whither do we go without our ancient faith? We go to the sacred negro; surely he will save us from the pestilence that walketh at noonday and the arrows that flieth by night. Do you believe that? Do you believe in the sacred negro? Our European people, especially our young people, do not even know that they have a sacred heritage. They believe they are only alive to the extent that they worship the sacred negro: “In the sacred negro and through the sacred negro, there is life.” That is what our people are taught. No wonder they are in despair. Somewhere in the recesses of their soul they yearn for someone besides the sacred negro. They will never find that Someone if the remnant band who still believe in Christ as true God and true man will not stand against the Black Lives Matter movement of the liberals and the colored heathen.(3) “Truth is truth till the end of reckoning,” Isabella declares in Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure. And negro worship is demonism; that is and always shall be true till the end of reckoning. You cannot serve two masters. If your Christian faith consists of proclaiming the compatibility of Christianity and negro worship, you are not a Christian. If we are true to our Jesus, we must renounce the devil and all his works, even if that means we must stand alone against the demon-possessed liberal swine who command us to bow down before the sacred negro.

It appears when we look at the modern Europeans that the European people are a race of cowards. How else can we explain a people who willingly place themselves in subjugation to another race, a race of cruel, merciless people who have not charity? But if we look at the history of the European people, we see there once was great courage and virtue within their ranks. What happened to them? It is our faith that gives us courage and strength. The Europeans now have a very strange faith — they believe they must submit to the cruelties of blacks because the black race is the manifestation of God incarnate. From my perspective, as a Christian, that is the ultimate blasphemy, but it is the belief of the modern Europeans.

Is it possible to go from where we are, in a nation in which the inhabitants worship the sacred negro, back to that other nation in which the inhabitants worshipped the Lord God, Jesus Christ? Yes, it is possible. It doesn’t, at present, seem very likely that the European people will break away from the sacred negro, but still there is that lonely figure standing before the Sanhedrin and answering Caiaphas’s question, “Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?,” with the words, “I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.” What was it that destroyed our faith in the great “I am”? It was the first part of the liberals’ trinity, the abstract intellect of man. St. Bonaventure warned the world about the danger of the Thomistic revolt against the indwelling spirit of Christ championed by the apostles and St. Paul. Their experience of God was a direct, heartfelt encounter: they saw Christ “feelingly” with the passion of men with hearts of flesh, and they passed on a vision of the heart, not a theory of God, to subsequent generations of Christians. By placing God out there, St. Thomas and all the philosophically minded clergymen made man’s abstract intellect, not man’s heart, the great arbiter of truth.

The first abstract-intellect men in the church decided in favor of the Christian God, but the natural philosophers who followed in St. Thomas’s train decided against the Christian God, who was declared to be a fraud. First the Voltaires and the Rousseaus revolted, but they were just a few weakened links on a strong chain of faith stretching all the way back to that stable in Bethlehem. But over many, many years, with the backing of science, men of “intelligence” succeeded in making the Christ story into a bedtime fairy tale, something that no intelligent people give any credence to. We must now prepare to meet with Caliban. We must destroy negro worship by attacking, as St. Paul did, the first person of the liberals’ trinity, the abstract intellect of man.

It is now taken as a given that the “intelligent” men and women are liberals. But is that the case if intelligence comes from vision, not from rationality? What do the prophets, who see with blinding sight, tell us about existence? What do St. Paul and the Apostles tell us? And what do the poets of our race, men such as Shakespeare, Chateaubriand, Scott, Dostoyevsky, Burke, and Grundtvig, tell us about that indwelling spirit within us who has a local habitation and a name? Kent begs King Lear to “see better,” to see with his heart, so that he can know it is Cordelia who loves him, not Goneril and Regan. So long as we remain captive to the satanically illuminated mind, we will not know the God who loves us, we will remain tragically allied with the liberals and the savage gods of color, and ultimately, through them, we will be connected to Satan.

I noticed in my early days in the prolife movement that “prolifers,” when going before the liberals’ Sanhedrin, would condemn legalized abortion because innocent black babies were being aborted. That was and is true, but what are you conceding when you say abortion is bad only because it kills black babies? You are kowtowing to the liberals’ god, the sacred negro. That is a game you cannot win: you cannot plead for redemption from the devil. The essence of the liberals’ new religion of the noble black savage is bloody sacrifice, not mercy. I saw another example of conservatives pandering to the black gods of liberalism the other day on Breitbart, which reported that Muhammad Ali Jr. had come out against Black Lives Matter. That does Muhammad Ali Jr. credit, but it does white people no good when the conservative shadows of the liberals ineffectually oppose liberalism by trying to find blacks who are opposed to the extermination of the white race. Do you really think you can obtain mercy and forgiveness from the liberals and the noble savages of color because you can find one black out of a thousand who is willing to allow white people a chance to live? Mercy and love have one source – “None but thee Lord, none but Thee.” Why won’t white people look to the God of their ascending race to save them instead of the second person of the liberals’ trinity?

In his book Watched by the Dead, Richard A. Proctor points out that in almost every book Charles Dickens wrote, there is some character gliding through the book that is thought to be dead, or, if still alive, thought to be inconsequential or too downright stupid to be taken notice of. And that character always steps out of the shadows of death, inconsequentiality, and stupidity to turn the tables on the evil villains of the novel. The same pattern can be seen in the works of Shakespeare and Walter Scott. Christ was the inconsequential figure in the Roman Empire and in the Jewish state who was considered dead and buried, but He became the reason for the defeat of both those secular realms, and He became the moral center of a realm called Christian Europe. Now the wheel has come full circle: Christ is once again a shadowy, inconsequential figure in a secular realm that combines the worst features of Roman paganism with a Shylockian hatred of the living God.

The complete collapse of white people in the face of the Black Lives Matter movement indicates a spiritual sickness that cannot be cured. Negro worship has become too deeply ingrained in the heart and soul of the European people. But our people must be cured. I have no empirical proof, but I know that the Mysterious Stranger still stands outside of our racial hearth fires waiting to be invited in. Is it as simple as saying, “Come, Lord Jesus”? Yes, it is that simple, once we have purged from our heart, mind, and soul, all three persons of the liberals’ trinity, the abstract intellect, the sacred negro, and science. If we fight only a defensive war – “Please allow me into Liberaldom, because I too worship the sacred negro” — we will surely cease to exist as a people in this world and will surely suffer eternal damnation in the next world. But if we go on the offensive, if we attack the immoral imbecility of the men of the abstract intellect, the blasphemy of negro worship, and the soul-killing superficiality of science, we will find our people and our God once again.+

_____________________

(1) The best-selling book, which is now a textbook in our schools, White Fragility, by Robin DiAngelo, is a precise exposition of the liberals’ religion. All whites are guilty of racism and all whites must die – except the illuminated whites such as DiAngelo, who have gone beyond whiteness to a plane of existence that thee and me cannot achieve. What DiAngelo desires for us is Haiti:

The nature of these events is well shown by the letter of a French officer secretly in Port-au-Prince at the time, who himself escaped by a miracle to the lesser evil of an English prison in Jamaica. “The murder of the whites in detail,” he writes, “began at Port-au-Prince in the first days of January, but on the 17th and 18th March were finished off en masse. All, without exception, have been massacred, down to the very women and children. Madame de Boynes was killed in a peculiarly horrible manner. A young mulatto named Fifi Pariset ranged the town like a madman searching the houses to kill the little children. Many of the men and women were hewn down by sappers, who hacked off their arms and smashed in their chests. Some were poniarded, others mutilated, others ‘passed on the bayonet,’ others disemboweled with knives or sabres, still others stuck like pigs. At the beginning a great number were drowned. The same general massacre has taken place all over the colony, and as I write you these lines I believe that there are not twenty whites still alive – and these not for long.”

This estimate, was indeed, scarcely exaggerated. The white race had perished utterly out of the land. French San Domingo had vanished forever, and the black State of Haiti had begun its troubled history.

The French Revolution in San Domingo by T. Lothrop Stoddard

(2) I sometimes go to a nearby shooting range. I don’t know why, but every shooting range I have ever gone to has a resident ‘gun nut.’ I don’t use that term in a derogatory sense – the gun nut is not a crazy man just itching to gun people down, far from it. The gun nut is usually an Americanist, an American Legion man who loves to show off his guns and talk about our marvelous Constitution with a Second Amendment that guarantees our right to bear arms.

The gun nut at this particular range is named, as most gun nuts are, Joe, and he regularly shows me guns of an amazing variety and high quality. Joe never shoots his guns, he just shows them off. Which calls to mind Patrick McManus’s (the great comic outdoorsman) statement to his wife when she asked him why he owned so many guns that he never shoots: “You don’t have a gun to shoot it, you have a gun so that it can be your gun.”

One day Joe – “he held me with his glittering eye” – started going on about other countries like Britain that had no Second Amendment and therefore had no guns to cherish anymore. Without trying to tweak Joe, because I liked the man, I said that the liberals in our country would eventually, by imperial fiat, take all the legally registered guns away from our people, so that it behooved us to start up a black market traffic in guns. Joe was incredulous: “They wouldn’t violate the Second Amendment.”

White people such as Joe, who are not at heart liberals, must come to realize that liberalism is from the devil. The devil does not respect constitutions, elections, or any of our democratic procedures. In fact he uses them for his own purposes. When they don’t suit his purposes, he abandons them. Look within, look to pietas – there you will find the passion and the fire to love much, to love your own and hate the devil.

(3) Tucker Carlson is the best of the mainstream commentators. He confronts issues that all the other ‘conservatives’ run away from. However, he falls woefully short in his commentary, because he still avoids the main crisis of the European people. Recently I heard Carlson say, quite rightly, that the terrorists of Antifa and Black Lives Matter should be opposed. Language is sermonic: calling terrorists terrorists is certainly a good start; they are not ‘protestors.’ Carlson went on to say that Trump should do something. Yes, he should. But what should be done to stop terrorists? The answer is simple – terrorists should be shot and killed. No government that is still a government can tolerate what is now going on in the name of Black Lives Matter. The F.B.I. gave orders to “shoot to kill” when they were dealing with the “white supremacist” Randy Weaver and his family. And they did just that: they shot and killed Weaver’s wife while she was standing in the doorway of their house, with her baby in her arms. Surely she was a dangerous terrorist who deserved to die! But the “peaceful protestors” throwing Molotov cocktails while they loot, murder, and rape are a protected species. The police are told not to shoot those creatures but to let them be.

No man can be elected to office in our nation who does not do homage to the sacred negro. If Trump gave the order to “shoot to kill” the Antifa/Black Lives Matter terrorists, he would be removed from office, tried for murder, and then executed. And he knows that. Trump is a very brave man, but he is not going to deliberately put his head on the chopping block.

Carlson is right to focus on the accelerating rate of the crime wave engulfing our anti-nation. But he is dead wrong to call for democratic solutions to a crisis that is a crisis of faith. If our people had the same faith in Christ as the antique Europeans, they would not be naked to their enemies. They would do what has to be done. We cannot avoid this thing called faith. Do we serve Christ or the negro?

Posted in Democracy, Faithful hearts, Negro worship | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Back from the Dead

The Iniquity of Negro Worship

Dore, Babylon

The rebels to God perfectly abhor the Author of their being. They hate him “with all their heart, with all their mind, with all their soul, and with all their strength.” He never presents himself to their thoughts but to menace and alarm them. They cannot strike the Sun out of Heaven, but they are able to raise a smouldering smoke that obscures him from their own eyes. Not being able to revenge themselves on God, they have a delight in vicariously defacing, degrading, torturing, and tearing in pieces his image in man. –Burke, Letters on a Regicide Peace

________________________

For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. –Revelations 18: 5

_______________________________________

The gentle bard told us what happens when charity gives way to cruelty:

It will come
Humanity must perforce prey on itself,
Like monsters of the deep.

Of course the inevitable has happened: without the charity that never faileth, which only existed in racist Europe, humanity is preying upon itself. The demon-crats want a police force in order to enforce the laws of demon-cracy, the Antifa want no police because they still perceive the police as a threat, and the black gods of the demon-crats and the Antifa hold their white subjects in the ranks of the demon-crats and the Antifa in contempt. Bringing up the rear are the conservative shadows of the liberals who respond to the burnings, the lootings, the rapes, and the murders by the blacks with pleas for dialogue with the devil and his minions. “Surely,” the conservatives plead, “we can all agree on that which is essential – we must love the negro, with our whole heart, mind, and soul. Proceeding on that essential, can’t we all come together?” No, we can’t all come together based on our love of the sacred negro. That religious absolute is the reason we live in a non-nation quickly becoming hell on earth.

I was surprised to see the people of the new nation of CHOP demanding porta-potties from the old nation of the demon-crats. Isn’t the need to defecate something that belongs only to the original sinners of racism? I thought utopian humanity had gone beyond that need. I suppose, for a time, certain non-utopian elements will appear in utopia. The utopians might have to receive aid from outside until they can evolve beyond racist humanity and become as gods who do not need porta-potties, electricity, and garbage removal.

Some demon-crats have expressed concerns over the extremism of the Antifa utopians. By what right do they criticize the Antifa utopians? Aren’t the Antifa their children? The demon-crats cannot, so long as the Antifa act in the name of the sacred negro, oppose anything the Antifa do. That leaves the Nancy Pelosis, who love their ice cream, and the Joe Bidens, who love their status as politicians, in a bind. They dare not seem too far to the right of Antifa, because their careers are based on being on the left, but if they allow Antifa to have their way they will not be allowed their ice cream palaces or their highly exalted status in Liberaldom. They will be consigned to a porta-potty existence in CHOP and other such mini-states.

The devil can set a tidal wave of evil in motion, but he can’t control where it goes and who it will engulf. Nor can we, mere mortals, predict the end result of the devil’s assault on the Christ-bearing race. All we know is that it will not be good. Will the Antifa liberals destroy the demon-crats and set up a whole nation of CHOPs? Will the demon-crats continue to rule while allowing for certain CHOP states within our anti-nation? Or will the blacks destroy the white liberal geese that are providing them with golden eggs by murdering the white Antifaers and the white demon-crats? I think we will have what Sweden has, what France has, what Belgium has, and what Britain has: we will have a far left government with a police and military that do not enforce any laws against the creatures of color, but that will enforce very strict laws against white ‘racists.’ And of course the definition of a white racist is: “Anybody who is white.” I think it would be better for the white grazers if the Antifaers completely destroyed our existing government. Then it will be clear to whites that they are on their own. They won’t hold out any false hope that their police and their military are going to save them. Of course neither I nor any man knows exactly how this new gambit of the Jacobin-Marxists will actually play out. But we do know who is behind this onslaught, so we know with complete certainty that what ensues will not be good. And we also know that we cannot dialogue with the devil. We must stop retreating before his minions in the hope that they and their master will stop just short of us. They won’t stop of their own accord, they must be stopped by Christian men.

The America of “My Country, ‘Tis of Thee, Sweet Land of Liberty,” is finished. But that should not make us despair. We never really belonged to that country. We belong to His Europe; whatever was good in our nation came from the Christian faith, which our illustrious founding fathers deemed too trivial and unimportant to be enshrined in our laws and Constitution. Lincoln was right: we were and are a nation conceived in liberty, liberty from God. Can such a nation long endure? No, it did not long endure. Americans needed a God; they couldn’t worship a system of government without a God at the center of that government. The sacred negro has entered the void at the heart of our nation and the other democratic nations of Europe. He is the new Savior of the European people. We won’t be able to see Him who saves while we are kneeling before the altar of the sacred negro.

Only the white Europeans, as a people, held His sacred cross before their eyes. “In life and death, oh Lord abide with me.” And only the white race has made the sacred negro their God. Is that a coincidence? Of course not. Negro worship comes from academia; the Rousseauian philosophers and French pamphleteers ushered in the French Revolution, and the flames of that revolution continue to be fueled by academics throughout the European world. We must then ask – from whence came academia? It came to us through the rational sector, the non-poetic sector, of ancient Greece. The first talk show culture existed in ancient Athens. “Let’s sit around and discuss the idea of God, while rejecting beforehand the possibility of knowing the truth about God.” Into that world, the world of academia, came St. Paul. And he preached the resurrection and the life through Jesus Christ.

Now while Paul waited for them at Athens, his spirit was stirred in him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry. Therefore disputed he in the synagogue with the Jews, and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him. Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection. And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus, saying, May we know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest, is? For thou bringest certain strange things to our ears: we would know therefore what these things mean. (For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing.)

Acts 17: 16-21

When our people came to see the same vision St. Paul saw on the road to Damascus, they became a people such as the world had never seen before. They bore witness to the one true God, whom the Athenian academics claimed could not possibly be the one true God. When we blend their world, the academics’ world of talk shows and panel discussions, with St. Paul’s inner world, the world of a heart connected to Christ, we destroy faith in Jesus Christ. The church as an organization is a ‘this world only’ organization. Dostoyevsky depicts such a church, a church opposed to Jesus Christ, in the Grand Inquisitor chapter of his novel The Brothers Karamazov. That church, the church of philosophy and theology, whose clergy study God from outside instead of taking Him into their hearts, spawned academia. And academia ultimately made Christ an intellectual construct who could be rejected completely or turned into Socrates.

I have not lost the thread of the story. We came to this pass where evil is given free reign so long as it is done in the name of the sacred negro, because we, as a people, have lost St. Paul’s vision of Christ as an ever present reality within every human heart that seeks to know Him “feelingly.” That is the way of true wisdom, the heartfelt wisdom that eschews the putrid, false wisdom of academia. The Europeans cannot, having once taken the one true God into their civilization, return to pure paganism. They must have a god who is a satanic caricature of the one true God. The negro is their savior, he is the new suffering servant. But has he really suffered at the hands of white people as his devotees tell us? No, he has not. His alleged persecutors in apartheid South Africa and the Old South were in reality his liberators who attempted to save him from heathenism, but the liberals must tell a different story, they must tell us of the black man’s horrible suffering because he must be their savior. And how does the new savior compare to Christ concerning mercy and forgiveness? There is no mercy or forgiveness in the black savior. Nor is there any hope for the resurrection of the dead in and through the black savior. Yet still the liberals cling to him, and the white grazers kneel to him. Do the grazers secretly yearn for Christ? I do not know just how far down the slippery slope they have gone, but it is a sad fact that we have a state religion that has surpassed Sodom and Gomorrah and the Babylonians in evil. And the evil of this our modern uncivilization is unopposed because the evil is done in the name of the sacred negro who cannot be opposed.

We know neither the day nor the hour, but I wonder, when I see Satan’s banner – “Black Lives Matter” – defiantly placed at the heart of what was once Christendom, if the final battle, the Icelandic Ragnarök and/or the Biblical Armageddon is now at hand. But then I draw back – such things are not within the ken of mortal men. And we are told that not even the angels in heaven know the day nor the hour. However, we have been given the heart to distinguish good from evil. It is not possible to love the sacred negro and love Christ. Nor is it possible to blend the two loves in order to avoid conflict. We have a war on our hands that can only be avoided if we surrender to the devil and his minions.

We are constantly told by the liberals that any criticism of Black Lives Matter is heresy and will be dealt with quite severely. White reactionaries will not be allowed to impose their old world racism on the new utopian world of diversity. But that old racist world had in it all that we will ever know of the love that passeth the understanding of the rational mind. To know that we touch the heart of God through human hearts imbued with His divine charity is a gift more precious to us than all the riches of this world. “Like unto that of a little child.” (1) What the great poets of our race saw in our people was a childlike faith in our Father which art in Heaven; they believed He would be with us always, through His Son, in life and death. They received that faith at their racial hearth fire, and they took that faith to all the corners of the earth. Now all the colored heathens of the earth are converging on the formerly Christian nations of Europe, at the special invitation of the Jacobin-Marxists, to sit on the thrones and be worshipped in the churches that were once consecrated to Christ our King.

Whites will only fight “Black Lives Matter,” which is the sign, symbol, and substance of liberalism, if they desire to become, once again, children of God. If they have no such desire, if they want to be grown-up pagans who get along quite nicely without the Divine Love, then they will continue to bow down to the sacred negro in order to obtain the approbation of the liberals and, they hope, the riches of this world. I am not that tough. I need the Divine Love and mercy. Therefore I will not bend my knee to Black Lives Matter – I will fight that entity with my whole heart, mind, and soul. +

_________________________________

(1) Some readers have asked about a blog post I wrote in September 2007 called, “The Sacred Heritage.” The authors I mentioned in that post had the European Faith of, “like unto that of a little child.” The post is viewable here

Posted in Charity, Christian Europe, Fear of racist label, Negro worship | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Iniquity of Negro Worship

Our God and Our People Matter Most of All

O all you host of heaven! O earth! What else?
And shall I couple hell? O, fie! Hold, my heart,
And you, my sinews, grow not instant old,
But bear me stiffly up. Remember thee!
Ay, thou poor ghost, while memory holds a seat
In this distracted globe.

Hamlet

_____________

There’s a hope that leaves me never,
All through the night.

-Welsh folk song

____________________________________________________________

No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” (Luke 16: 13) The sacred negro has one very great advantage over Christ: he can be seen with the material eye, he is not of the spirit. He has come to represent mammon, the false god of riches and success. You cannot have success in this world, the Jacobin-Marxist world, without paying homage to the sacred negro and the other lesser gods of color. The new religion of negro worship appears to be more completely developed in the United States than any other nation, but all the white nations hold to the democratic way: they love the noble savage, and that love will ultimately destroy them.

Just when you think it is impossible to be surprised by the extent of the intellectual Christians’ and the conservatives’ apostasy, I find that I am surprised. The liberals have gone beyond anything they have ever done before during the COVID-19 crisis and the George Floyd insurrection — that does not surprise me – but the conservatives and the intellectual Christians, during the George Floyd insurrection, have thrown themselves on the altars of the sacred negro with a passionate intensity that indicates even more than an indifference to Christ; it indicates that they share the same hatred for Christ as their mad-dog brethren. That has thrown me for a loop. I didn’t know they were that far gone.

To talk of making America great again in the aftermath of the George Floyd blasphemy is an absurdity. White America only existed as a real nation in the South before the Civil War. (1) Since that time we have been a Jacobin-Marxist non-nation, consecrated to the sacred negro. Trump’s ‘victory’ was nothing more than a man picking up one broken shard from the ruins of a stately mansion burnt to the ground. There is no house left to defend against the looters and despoilers, but we have a certain admiration for a man who is at least man enough to take down a few looters before he goes down.

Beginning with Spengler’s Decline of the West in 1918, the 20th century has produced enough ‘death-of-the-West’ books to fill a large library. I’m not speaking of the celebratory death-of-the-West books, the books in which the authors were glad the West was dying; I am speaking of the men who wanted to show us the way to restore the West. Richard Weaver, in Ideas Have Consequences, spoke for all the death-of-the-West authors when he said he was not going to conclude his objective analysis of the ills of the West with a plea of impotence, he was going to offer a solution to the demise of the West. And what was Weaver’s solution? He told us to cling to the right of private property.

Other death-of-the-West conservatives offered different restoration plans from Weaver’s, but their plans did not really differ in kind from Weaver’s plan. All the conservatives presented very rational, material solutions to a spiritual problem. That which all conservatives sought to avoid, the issue of “Who moved the stone,” was placed off to the side while the Socratic conservatives debated with the Jacobin mad-dogs. The debate has now ended in America: the ‘noble savage’ Jacobins have won. But throughout the European nations the conservative shadows of the liberals are busy outlining their policies of defeat. They have made Christ into Socrates and the noble black savage their savior. Such states cannot stand up against the looters and despoilers.

Yeats’s oft-quoted statement that the best lack all conviction and the worst are full of passionate intensity no longer describes the plight of Western man. It is now a case of the best, the formerly Christian Europeans, having adopted the passionate intensity of the worst, the mad-dog liberals; they have learned to love the sacred negro. And with that love of the sacred negro comes legalized abortion, homosexual marriage, transgenderism, and every other evil under the sun. If the natural savage represents virtue, then the complete indulgence of one’s appetites becomes virtuous and the practice of the old Christian virtues becomes sin:

They teach the people, that the debauchers of virgins, almost in the arms of their parents, may be safe inmates in their house, and even fit guardians of the honour of those husbands who succeed legally to the office which the young literators had pre-occupied, without asking leave of law or conscience.

-Burke, Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

The liberals, or if you like a harsher phrase, the radical left, are pushing their Satanic logic to its ultimate conclusion. Like predatory carnivores, they sense that their prey will not fight, so they are going in for the kill. The Socratic Christians have joined the radical left; they also want white blood as well. And they hope if they join with the radical left that they will be spared. It is fight or die; there are no other options for the white European. It’s possible to be killed later than sooner by sacrificing your kith and kin to the liberals and the heathens of color, but that is the only way to survive, for a time, in Liberaldom. Do you want to survive that way? “Yes,” the grazers and the conservatives proclaim, “We will survive if we denounce the racist whites and their civilization.” That won’t be the case – the conservatives and the grazers will be slaughtered soon after their betrayal of their people. If the white grazers and the conservatives don’t love His Europe and His people enough to fight for them, then they are not going to be of any use to themselves or the remnant band. Is there a remnant band? I don’t see them, but what is our faith if it can be seen?

In old Europe, the Europe of Shakespeare, Handel, and Rembrandt, we were vouchsafed a vision of the living God. We saw, with our hearts, the divine Love. And in modern Europe we have been given a vision of unadulterated Satanism. If we love where we should love and hate where we should hate, we will oppose the liberals with our whole heart, mind, and soul. Why hasn’t that happened? Why don’t the European people want to fight the liberals to the death? They won’t fight the devil and his minions because they do not love the God-Man who died on the cross for our sins and to save us from death. Only our Savior can inspire us to fight against the seemingly irresistible forces of liberalism. But He no longer dwells within the European people’s hearts. There can be only one Savior. If the sacred negro has replaced Christ as the God of the European people, how can they fight against the liberals? They can’t and they won’t. Thus the love of the sacred negro doth make cowards and traitors of the European people.

The conservative death-of-the-West chroniclers could not unseat the mad-dog liberals because they themselves were universalists. They could not champion a particular people against a generic love for all mankind, which the liberals made claim to, because they would not champion the particular God who entered human history. Paine, in his Rights of Man, dismissed Burke’s concern for the victims of the Terror with the statement: “What matters the loss of a few frills and few people.” That is the same man who said of Christianity: “It has been the most dishonorable belief against the character of the Divinity, the most destructive to morality and the peace and happiness of man, that ever was propagated since man began.” Paine, who sought to make man’s religion conform to reason and science, won out over Burke, who was concerned with “a few frills and few people.” Christian Europe was that frill and all the white Europeans who adhere to His Europe are the few people who must be eliminated. We cannot place our hopes, as the conservatives do, in the debate over universal theories designed to save a generic mankind from unhappiness and suffering in this world. There is no panacea in the abstractions of the liberals, be they classical or mad-dog. There is only death in life and eternal damnation in rational, scientific panaceas that reject our unscientific faith in our risen Lord.

If you can’t love a particular God and a particular people, you will never be able to draw a line in the sand and tell your enemies, “Thou shalt not cross that line, or you will die.” If our God and our people can be dismissed as “frills and a few people,” we will watch the people who worship the great universal god, the sacred negro, destroy every vestige of the European civilization that once was our spiritual home. Throughout the European world, the monuments, the art works, even the bodies of our honored dead are being destroyed and desecrated. Does it matter? Why should we defend dead racists? Shouldn’t we embrace what is scientific and real, the natural world of the sacred negro? Can the sacred negro, with the backing of science, which is the liberals’ holy ghost, raise the dead? Does the sacred negro love us? For the love of Him who died on the cross we must drive them, the liberals and their colored minions, back across that European line, and then we must defend that line against all the world.

I knew that the conservatives were spiritually weak because they were not really conservative, and I knew that the grazers were confused and easily manipulated by the liberal elite. But I did not think the liberals and their colored minions could be so blatantly evil without eliciting some kind of response from the conservatives and the grazers. The spiritual rot is even deeper than I thought. What is there left to say to the conservatives and the grazers? Nothing at all.

So much blood has been shed by white men for the negro. Our ‘civil’ war, which had nothing civil about it, was fought under the banner of ‘black lives matter,’ and a “few” white lives didn’t matter. That remains the mantra of the Jacobin-Marxist. The people that matter are the blacks, and the vermin that must be exterminated are the whites throughout all of the European nations. All the white men and the white women in leadership positions in the European world have signed on to the extermination of the white race under the banner of ‘black lives matter.’ But why do black lives matter? If Christ be not risen, if faith, hope, and charity belongs only in fairy tale books, then why should I, or any man, care about a criminally inclined race of people? Only white Christians, the whites of the old South, and the apartheid South Africans cared enough about black people to make the attempt to save them from themselves, to put a stop to their hellish, murderous heathenism. When there are no longer any whites to stand between them and the Orientals, they will become beasts of burden, enslaved by the masters of torture and cruelty. And the whites who worship them, where will they be? They will be in the place with the swine who went over the cliff in their mad flight from the Son of the living God.

In my freshmen year in college I read Bertrand Russell’s famous work on the religions of the world. When he came to Christianity he asserted that no force of will, no sentimental desire to once again embrace our beloved dead, could alter the nothingness of our existence here on earth. I rebelled against Russell then just as I rebel against the ‘black lives matter’ mantra of the Jacobin-Marxists and the colored barbarians now. I won’t betray my God and my people by bowing down to the principalities and powers of this world. If, as it appears, there are no Europeans left on the face of the earth, I can at least make my refusal. I will not bend my knee to any God but Christ, and I will be faithful to only one nation – His Europe. As for the rest of the world, the inhuman devils cavorting around the throne of the sacred negro, who is a conduit to Satan, at that world, I hurl my defiance.

The love that once was there in that magnificent living tapestry of Christian Europe is still here. I can see all of my honored dead when I close my outer eyes and listen with the inner eye of the heart. They still live in Christ and through Christ. That vision of the heart will sustain me and thee in our day of battle with the liberals and their colored minions, and it will sustain us “all through the night.” +

___________________________________

(1) It is not just offensive, it is blasphemous when outwardly masculine sport figures applaud the removal of the Confederate flag at sporting events like NASCAR. That flag, the only American flag with a cross on it, is the symbol of a Christian nation in which charity was extended to all people, black and white, and the honor of that civilization was maintained by a white hierarchy who worshipped Christ, not the negro and science. And because they didn’t worship the negroes, they were able to elevate the negroes. That is something the liberals have never done and never will do.

The modern world condemns all that is good and lauds everything that is evil. It is an easy thing to denounce your Christian forebears by calling them racists. But let’s state the truth of the matter. The outwardly masculine anti-racists are spiritual cowards. They lack the moral courage to stand with a few brave souls against the world. Will we ever see European manhood, the Christian manhood of men like Burke, Havelock, Forrest, and Lee, again? No, we won’t, unless we see the God-Man’s blood upon the rose.

Posted in Charity, Christ, Jacobinism, Muscular Christianity, Negro worship | Tagged | Comments Off on Our God and Our People Matter Most of All

Amid the Encircling Gloom

Doré. Scripture reader in a night refuge

________________

Our race is our spiritual stronghold. Within that stronghold are the mysterious human relationships that give us the wherewithal to fight the battle against principalities and powers. If you strip a man of his racial identity, you strip him of his soul. How can a man without a soul fight the good fight? He can’t; he can only surrender to the devil and his minions. – CWNY (2012)

_________________

On a daily basis innocent whites are murdered by black barbarians. The black murder plague is far worse than the plague called the coronavirus. When Tommie Lindh, the white, 19-year-old, Swedish man, was murdered trying to stop a black barbarian from raping a white girl, the liberal and conservative media were silent, as they are always silent in the face of the murder of a white by a black. But when a black criminal dies while being arrested by white policemen, the media explodes with condemnations of white racism, and the black barbarians seize the moment to increase their burnings, lootings, rapes, and murders. We live in the midst of diversity-created plagues – coronavirus and black – that have one source: the hatred of the Christ-bearing race. When our churchmen stop hating the white race and start defending His Europe, when the liberals are opposed instead of appeased, then we will begin to see some light in the darkness. – CWNY

_____________________________________________________

The opinions that follow are merely anecdotal; they have not been clinically tested. You have been warned.

I was brought up in a white middle-class household by parents who considered themselves to be “moderate liberals.” Both my parents were the first of their lines to go to college. My mother did not believe in Christ’s resurrection from the dead; she thought Christianity was a good ethical system. And my father rejected all of the Old Testament – fundamentalism was an anathema to him – but he made a leap of faith when he came to the New Testament. My parents, my pastors, and my teachers in the all-white public schools I attended, all believed in the sacred negro. So of course I grew up believing in the sacred negro as well.

My faith was first tested when I encountered the sacred negroes on the rival sport teams. They did not play according to the code that I was taught to play by. But my coaches had prepared me for that rude awakening. They explained to me beforehand that I shouldn’t expect the black players to behave like whites. They had suffered years of racism and oppression, so I had to make allowances. Did I make allowances? Yes, I did. Although once during a high school basketball game, I responded to insults against my mother with an elbow to the face of the offending player. I got a lecture from my coach afterwards about “understanding their rage,” etc. Did I understand? Yes, I suppose I still did. I apologized for my “unwarranted” outburst.

Let me fast forward to the summer of my freshman year in college. I had a job as a camp counselor at a camp for inner city boys. The camp was run by blacks for black boys, ages 8 to 12 years. I was the only white counselor amongst a whole host of black counselors. That did not bother me because, as I said, I was raised to revere the black race. I was not picked on – I suppose I would have been picked on had I been weak and frail, but I was not. So my moral dilemma had nothing to do with what was done unto me. It was not a case, as it was in junior high and high school, of being tolerant of the blacks’ uncivil behavior toward me as a white man. No, it was a case of the black counselors’ cruelty toward the black children. I need not chronicle the long litany of cruelty and abuse I witnessed; let one 8-year-old boy step forward. He was not in my group, but I saw what he endured. He was weak, frail, and nonathletic, which is a difficult fate to endure in a white camp for boys, but in the black camp he was in danger of being removed, by an excess of cruelty from his counselor and his fellow campers, from the face of the earth. I intervened and got him transferred to my group even though the head of the camp told me that blacks were not whites: “We do things differently.” Ah, there’s the rub! I could not agree that cruelty to children was not cruelty if it was perpetrated by black men. To me, it was still cruelty. There was a footnote to that anecdote: The boy’s mother told me at the close of camp that she was grateful to me for showing her son a kindness that he had never received before from a male. That is rather sad, isn’t it?

Now, that one, small anecdote can be easily dismissed as white racism. You can tell me that there is even more cruelty in the white race – “Look at their wars, look at colonialism” etc. But I can only bear witness to what I have seen through the eyes of my heart. I saw then and I see now that it is only in the white race, when the white race was Christian, that we see that undefinable virtue that never faileth. Outside the white race there is no such thing as charity.

Africans have respected power deriving from force for too many centuries to acquire any moral shackles – they admire and follow the man with strength. Here is an illustration, amusing but unfortunately quite true. In a school run by the Catholic Church for young men showing aptitudes which might befit them for eventual priesthood, a film was being shown. The film represented in silent form the trial and crucifixion of Jesus Christ. At the scene in the Palace where the Roman soldiers struck Him with whips and placed a crown of thorns upon His head, excited cries of ‘Pika! Pika!’ rang out from the Congolese. Pika means hit or strike, and quite naturally, as in a Western film we cheer on the goodies and boo the baddies, they were encouraging the strong against the weak.

Another film depicting in symbolic form the ending of the Arab slave trade by the white man was greeted with equal enthusiasm—each slash of the long whip on the wretched black man’s back was cheered wholeheartedly, and when in coming to grips with the Arab the white hero is momentarily thrown to the ground—their shouts reached a crescendo of support for the Arab—not as representing a race, creed or idea—but simply because he symbolized power and force.

-D. P. Dugauquier, Congo Cauldron

During the 1950s a child of moderate liberals, be he Catholic or Protestant, was usually exposed to the Christ story before he was given the straight, organizational party line, the party line that destroys faith in the Christ story. So I had the Christ story in my heart as a touchstone of reality even during my late teens and early twenties, when the scientific worldview forced me to conclude that, “Christ be not risen.” But it was the Christ story that triumphed over science by my mid-twenties. Why? Because I saw Christ in His people. They, the antique Europeans, who had charity, spoke to my heart: “I wept and I believed.” That ‘sentimental’ attachment to our people must not be allowed to perish from the earth, because it is our connection to the living God. If Christianity becomes, as it has become, synonymous with the worship of the negro, then what is our faith? Are we supposed to believe, contrary to the words of our Lord, that the cruel and the merciless shall inherit the earth?

These ‘spontaneous’ outbursts of love for George Floyd are not spontaneous outbursts of love. The blacks are just as cruel to their own people as they are to the whites. They don’t really care about the death of George Floyd, who was not murdered. However ill-advised it was to kneel on a man’s neck, it must be emphasized that the police officer who has been damned by the liberal world could have killed instantly with one blow to the head or one bullet if he had been trying to commit murder. But of course that is not the issue. The blacks want a world in which they can rape, murder, and steal to their hearts’ content. And they have such a world. (1) Every time a black dies at the hands of a policeman, black or white (in Baltimore, the majority of the officers were black), the powers that be make it illegal to arrest blacks. And the ‘spontaneous’ riots, which are called protests? They are planned and orchestrated by the Jacobin-Marxists who call themselves Antifa. It was Trotsky who gave the Jacobin-Marxists their battle plan. He said that the Marxists should use the black race to destroy the European governments. And they have done just that. Who will say, “Stop, this shall not go on!”

No one will say stop, this shall not go on because it is up to the Christ-imbued European to stand up to the forces of Satan. And tragically there are no Christ-imbued Europeans. Organized Christian Jewry only produces ‘Christians’ who have disregarded our Lord’s stricture against serving two masters. The churchmen have tried and are still trying to serve Christ and the Negro. That cannot be. What happens when you cannot condemn cruelty when negroes are the practitioners of cruelty? What happens when you must condemn the Christ-centered culture of old Europe because it was racist? You will support the liberals who serve Satan because they are not racist. It is significant that the only whites who practiced cannibalism as a cannibalistic sect (the Donner party was an aberration) were the French Jacobins, who drank the blood of the French aristocrats after they were beheaded. And the modern Jacobins, the Antifa, tell us to “Eat the rich.” Thus the two become one, the Antifa liberal is joined in his cannibalism to the noble black savage.

The Batatela tribe were described in 1899 as being a race of remarkably tall and well-made people where no signs of disease or age were apparent. It was discovered afterwards that this was due to the fact that the young Batatelas ate their parents directly any signs of decrepitude became too evident.

-Congo Cauldron

But why should we be prejudiced against cannibalism? If the sacred negro does it, how can it be wrong? What right do we, white racists, have to judge our gods? And isn’t eating the older members of the herd in keeping with the wisdom of the Darwinian Swedes and their conservative advocates in the United States? Let’s all gather at the sacrificial altars on which white blood flows by the throne of Satan.

At the hour of his death, H. F. Lyte, possibly the most Christ-imbued European who ever lived, asked our Lord to, “Hold thou thy cross before my closing eyes.” He saw his salvation in the cross of Christ, because he had lived his entire life in and through Christ. Most Europeans fell far short of Henry Lyte, but there was a time when we, as a people, believed that men and women who lived as Henry Lyte lived, in and through Christ, were the penultimate of humanity. That an entire people believed the living God had entered human history through humanity was a miracle. We must support that miracle culture, especially now that it is completely condemned by ‘Christians’ and liberals. If we make black barbarians our saviors then we are damned. How can we, who once had Christ as our Savior, stoop so low? Who is being served when we worship the blacks? Is our God being served? Are we, the European people, being served? Are the people of color being served? Only Satan is being served.

This terrible, blasphemous rush, by avowed Christians such as Vice-President Pence, to worship at the altars of the noble black savage in the wake of the death of George Floyd has brought home to me something I have tried to avoid. I have frequently called such ‘Christians,’ who combine the worship of the negro with the worship of Christ, half-way house Christians. I did that because I wanted to believe there was a remnant of the true faith in those Europeans who called themselves Christians. But it is not so. Absolutely nothing remains in organized Christian Jewry of our ancient faith in Christ crucified, Christ risen. What we see before our eyes when we look at the unfaith of the modern European Christians is the noble black savage on the sacred cross of Christ.

There is no more inspiring and hopeful story in the Gospels than the story of the good thief who asks our Lord to remember him when He comes into His Kingdom. But when the intellectual Christians take Christ off His sacred cross and place Him in the position of the good thief, asking the noble black savage for mercy and forgiveness, then we see before our closing eyes the most hideous blasphemy in the history of mankind. It was the antique European people who held His cross before our eyes, in life and death we belonged to Him. Now we are constantly told by all the world that we must hold the sacred negro before our eyes in life and death. The shame is ours, the guilt is ours, the damnation is ours, if we do not tear the hideous blasphemy of negro worship from our hearts. Lord, forgive us our sins and stay with us “amid the encircling gloom, in life and death, abide with us.” +
________________________________________________

(1) If the police cannot arrest the greatest perpetrators of crime, for fear they might kill them when they resist arrest, of what use is a police force? Our policemen come from our culture, a culture which is ruled by Jacobin-Marxists who have placed the sacred negro at the religious center of our culture. Do you really think that young men, who want to make a living, are going to oppose their liberal rulers by arresting black people? No, they won’t. Especially after they see what has happened when police officers wound, maim, or kill blacks in their efforts to make an arrest. The police officers, who must do something, will concentrate their efforts on white prolife demonstrators, white ranchers, and whites who voted for Trump. Then, like the police in the European nations currently are doing, they can really release their inner demons and use force in the defense of the Jacobin-Marxist government that pays them. The police are not the friends of white people. Protect yourself and your family and look to Christ for salvation, not to Demoncracy. It is better that we have no police than a police who serve the liberals and their gods.

Lest We Forget – Tommie Lindh

Posted in Charity, Christian Europe, Jacobinism, Negro worship | Tagged | Comments Off on Amid the Encircling Gloom

Our Miracle Culture

Rembrandt. The Angel Appears to the Shepherds.

“Tis the time’s plague when madmen lead the blind.” –King Lear

______________

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. –John 1: 1-5

______________________________________________________

There is one thing certain about the coronavirus: it has become the most politicized virus in the history of the European people. Wasn’t such a politicization inevitable? People without a blood faith must turn to the abstract ‘science’ of politics to convince themselves that “still they live” and to convince the aggregate herd (there are no human personalities in modern democracies) that their political schemes can bring mankind happiness and freedom from suffering.

In contrast to the modern purveyors of secular happiness stands Jesus Christ. He promised His followers a cross. That was a very odd promise for someone running for office. But of course Christ wasn’t running for any office; He was and is the Word made flesh, and He left us free to reject Him or take Him into our hearts. Again, wasn’t that rather foolish? Who wants to take a crucifixion into their heart? Certainly not the liberals of either the mad-dog or classical mold. We dare not fall into the trap of choosing between the liberalism of the mad-dog liberal and the classical liberal, who is now called a conservative, because both forms of liberalism lead us to hell.

I have quoted Thomas Mann’s story before, but I want to reference it again because it is apropos. Back in ancient times a Greek servant, an Athenian, was doing the shopping for his master. While going about the business of shopping he saw Death in the marketplace, and Death looked at him with what the servant considered a threatening look. He stopped shopping, ran back to his master’s house, and started packing his meager belongings. His master asked him what he was doing. “I’m sorry, I must leave you for a time. I was in the marketplace, and Death looked at me with a threatening glance, so I’m going to Crete to escape him.”

So the servant left for Crete. His master then went to the marketplace to find Death, and when he found him, he asked him why he had looked at his servant with a threatening glance. Death replied, “I did not look at your servant with a threatening glance. That was a look of surprise. You see, I have an appointment with him today in Crete.”

The tragic irony of the coronavirus crisis is that it is a man-made tragedy; it is the result of the liberals’ (both classical and mad-dog) attempt to escape from Christ.  We all suffer and die, but our suffering increases tenfold when we try to avoid the cross of Christ. The European people have had devastating plagues when they were a Christian people, but this particular plague, or virus, is the result of liberalism; it was not an inevitable part of the European story because we would not, if we were a Christian people, have opened up our borders to the heathens of color. A Christian nation is a provincial nation; the leaders of a Christian nation care about the particular people within their nation and they endeavor to protect their people from the dangers that come from the pestilence that walketh at noonday through open borders. The coronavirus deaths, the unemployment, the despair that has led to increased suicides, are all the result of the liberals’ hatred of Christ and the classical liberals’ indifference to Christ.

In order to highlight the differences between a Christian people with Christian leaders and the current European nations led by liberals and classical liberals, let us pretend that the coronavirus has entered into a fictional Christian nation. What would and would not be the Christian response to the virus? Let us start with the scientists, the ‘experts.’ If they looked at existence through a heart connected to Christ, they would try to provide their nation’s leadership with accurate information about the virus. They would not invent an end-of-the-world-plague scenario in order to give their liberal cohorts the excuse to place the nation under martial law. And what would the fourth estate and the respective houses of Congress do in a Christian nation? They would rally around their king or their president in his attempts to combat the virus. They would not automatically oppose the use of a drug that seemed to offer people a cure for the disease simply because their king or president recommended it. Nor would they close down the country in an effort to ruin the economy so they could destroy their political opponent. But of course we do not have a Christian nation, and the Demoncrats have tried to destroy Trump by rolling up the death tolls and destroying the economy.

Now let us look, through the eyes of the people in our fictional Christian nation, at the classical liberals. At first glance the conservatives, who consist of the intellectual Christians, the libertarians, the Jeffersonians, and the Darwinian capitalists, seem to represent the good because they oppose the mad-dog liberals. But the conservatives have their own agenda that is also opposed to Christ’s reign of charity. It is unChristian to destroy another man’s livelihood in order to destroy your political opponent; that is what the Demoncrats are doing. But it is also unChristian to ‘open up’ your nation, citing the Darwinian Swedes, because nature is all and nature does not care about the individual, it only cares about the herd. The conservatives are the greatest danger to our faith because they seem preferable to the Demoncrats. However, there should be something inside of us that is horrified by the cold rationality of the conservatives such as Heather MacDonald: “Conservative values like small government, self-reliance, and liberty can be defended without recourse to invisible deities or the religions that exalt them.” That immoral imbecility can only come from a mind that has been thoroughly ‘educated’ in modern universities specializing in the ‘Ye shall be as gods’ theology of Satan. We cannot decide anything of importance — and how we respond to a plague or virus is important — without reference to that “invisible deity” within, whom our ancestors believed to be that very visible God who suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried; and on the third day He rose again from the dead.

We, as a people, have lost touch with the miracle culture of old Europe, the culture of Christ Crucified, Christ Risen, because first our churchmen, and then, following in the churchmen’s footsteps, our secular rulers, have damned the God-given divinity within man; they blasphemed against the Holy Ghost in order to champion that which was outside of man, the natural world which could be dissected by the mind of man. The new faith became an outward thing held together by science.  The mad-dog liberals accuse their enemies, the classical liberals, of being unscientific, and the classical liberals fire back with the same charge against the mad-dog liberals. But neither side is willing to repudiate the new holy ghost, which is science.

The professed Christians in modern Europe have managed to keep faith with the mad-dog liberals by wedging Christ into the first part of the liberals’ trinity, which is the abstract intellect. If faith in Christ becomes a philosophy, it is still possible for the ‘Christian’ to maintain the liberals’ faith in the noble black savage and science. That is why organized Christianity does not give the white grazer an alternative faith to liberalism. The churchmen have forsaken Christ for the promise of liberalism: “Ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” But why then can the churchmen, the conservative liberals, not see the evil of liberalism and the good that was in the antique Europeans? Why are the liberals deemed good and the antique Europeans deemed evil? Is it because the latter were racist and sexist? Yes, it is. But why is pietas evil? And why is a recognition that women, the life-bearers and the life-nurturers, have a different role than men, the Christ-bearers, evil? All of the maniacal, satanic hubris of modern man can be summed up by the words of St. Paul in Romans 1: 22: “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.” Our modern European civilization, which is in reality an uncivilization, was built on the Tower of Babel assumption that man’s intellect, unaided by the grace of God, can reach the heavens. The end result of that ‘exalted’ reasoning has placed us in hell on earth.

There are a number of James Fitzpatrick films from the early 1950s in which he visits rural communities in Holland, Denmark, and Switzerland. Those communities, which are racially and ethnically homogeneous, seem to be, in Fitzpatrick’s eyes, and in my eyes, as close as human beings can get to heaven on earth. Death and suffering still exist in those communities, but the man-made tragedies that increase human suffering and the religious despair at the hour of death that exist in the more ‘advanced’ nations are not a part of those communities. However, at the end of those marvelous vignettes, Fitzpatrick and I part company, because he attributes the magnificence of those provincial white communities to democracy. Au contraire! It is democracy, the government of diversity and equality, that ultimately brought down those white, provincial cultures. The people depicted in the Fitzpatrick films were living in nations that still adhered to a Christian ethos, and many of the older members of those communities still retained a faith in the miracle culture of old Europe. When that faith faded, the ethos started fading, and by the 21st century those white Christian communities were non-communities in a non-nation. Neither capitalism, socialism, distributism, nor any other theory of economic development can restore such non-nations. They are dead, as we are dead as individuals if we do not reject the theories of liberalism, classical and mad-dog, and return to the faith of the people who walked on water because they believed in the Son of God.

The mad-dog liberals and the classical liberals seem to be at odds during this coronavirus crisis, but they are not at odds on that which is essential, that the culture of the antique Europeans should be seen through the eyes of the heart and recognized for what it was – the miracle culture of the people who saw His blood upon the rose. They made His incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection from the dead part of their blood. The statistical culture of the mad-dog liberals and the classical liberals is built on the assumption that what is essential is not essential. The mad-dog liberals say that Christ be not risen, and the conservatives tell us that whether Christ be risen or Christ be not risen is irrelevant – what is necessary is that we adhere to the proper philosophy. What unites the liberal and the conservatives is their love of the negro and their rejection of the miracle culture of the antique Europeans.

Mankind must have a personal savior; if they will not have Christ because His resurrection from the dead is unscientific, then they will have the noble savage as their savior. During this so-called health crisis, the real crisis, the vicious, unrelenting attack on the white race by the heathens of color has increased tenfold. And the liberals who encourage the attacks and the conservatives who are indifferent to the attacks still keep arguing about economics. (1) The only economy that we should worry about is ignored — we should preserve our spiritual economy, the miracle culture of the antique Europeans. Go and learn what Dostoevsky’s Stepan Trofimovich meant when he said that Shakespeare was more important than shoes. Our lives are indeed a miracle; we are either connected to His miracle or we are nothing. Our modern uncivilization is a wheel of fire. If we look back to that other civilization, to His Europe, we can know something of the divine love which transcends statistics, plagues, and economic theories. There must be more to our faith than an adherence to the laws of an organized church. We must have something inside of us that allows us to transcend the law in order to live in Him and through Him. +

___________________

(1) On a daily basis innocent whites are murdered by black barbarians. The black murder plague is far worse than the plague called the coronavirus. When Tommie Lindh, the white, 19-year-old, Swedish man, was murdered trying to stop a black barbarian from raping a white girl, the liberal and conservative media were silent, as they are always silent in the face of the murder of a white by a black. But when a black criminal dies while being arrested by white policemen, the media explodes with condemnations of white racism, and the black barbarians seize the moment to increase their burnings, lootings, rapes, and murders. We live in the midst of diversity-created plagues – coronavirus and black – that have one source: the hatred of the Christ-bearing race. When our churchmen stop hating the white race and start defending His Europe, when the liberals are opposed instead of appeased, then we will begin to see some light in the darkness.

Posted in Christian Europe, Classical liberalism, Democracy, Scientism | Tagged | Comments Off on Our Miracle Culture

Sweet Fields Beyond the Plague of Rationalism

Whatever is left in this world of God’s grace comes from human hearts which are not completely closed to St. Paul’s vision of that lonely figure, the son of the living God, standing before the religious atheists and the outright atheists of the Sanhedrin. –CWNY

____________

The conflict between the demonic little dwarf Tony Fauci, who insists there is no clinical evidence to support the claim that the coronavirus is the Wuhan virus, and the conservatives, who assert that the Chinese plague came from the war laboratories in Wuhan, is a microcosm of the tragedy of Western man ever since the beginning of the 20th century. There are the forces of evil, represented by Fauci, the liberals, and the Chinese communists, but there are no corresponding forces of good to counter the forces of evil. And we cannot have a happy conclusion to the fairy tale of European civilization without the forces of good.

Are not the conservatives the forces of good? No, you cannot represent an opposing force to evil when you are a shadow, to once again borrow Dabney’s term, of the evil force which you oppose. The liberal openly disposes of the Christian God in order to adhere to his triune God of the abstract intellect, the noble savage, and science. The conservative wants to keep Christ in the framework of the abstract intellect – he wants Christ the philosopher rather than Christ the savior – while maintaining the noble savage as his savior and science as his holy ghost. It is only when we return to a fairytale vision of life, the vision bequeathed to us by Christ, St. Paul, and the antique Europeans, that we can respond to the forces of evil as Christ would have us respond. What then is missing in the conservative’s response to the evil dwarf and his liberal cohorts? The prophetic fire is missing, the prophetic fire of Isaiah and St. Paul, which is grounded in the charity that never faileth:

It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then the dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began to move in; glittering like the morning star, full of life, and splendor, and joy. Oh! what a revolution! and what an heart must I have, to contemplate without emotion that elevation and that fall! Little did I dream when she added titles of veneration to those of enthusiastic, distant, respectful love, that she should ever be obliged to carry the sharp antidote against disgrace concealed in that bosom; little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fallen upon her in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honour and of cavaliers. I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators, has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever. Never, never more, shall we behold that generous loyalty to rank and sex, that proud submission, that dignified obedience, that subordination of the heart, which kept alive, even in servitude itself, the spirit of an exalted freedom. The unbought grace of life, the cheap defence of nations, the nurse of manly sentiment and heroic enterprise, is gone! It is gone, that sensibility of principle, that charity of honour, which felt a stain like a wound, which inspired courage whilst it mitigated ferocity, which ennobled whatever it touched, and under which vice itself lost half its evil, by losing all its grossness.

– Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France

Can “that charity of honour” be seen? Can we bring charity and honor into the duel of statistics between the liberals and the conservatives? No, we cannot, because charity is not so nominated in the democratic bond we have forged with the devil. We can only bring ‘clinical facts’ that can be seen with the eye of science into the arena, we cannot bring that which can only be seen through the eye into battle. That is the democratic rule. But the liberals’ ‘facts’ come from Satan – they are satanic lies he uses to attack the living God. We cannot counter those lies and the people who live by those lies by referencing the rationality of conservatism and the irrationality of liberalism, because that false definition of good and evil – “We, the conservatives, are good because we are rational, and the liberals are bad because they are irrational” – is part of the great lie, that abstract reason, divorced from the grace of God, can arrive at the truth.

Must we always find some abstract theory of God, must God be put in a golden bowl so that He can be validated by man’s abstract reason? “Yes,” the conservatives tell us. So God resides out there somewhere while the conservatives enter the lists, armed with good solid statistics, but without the full armor of Christ, which can only be worn by those men and women who have allowed the fairytale God into their hearts. In contrast, the liberals enter the lists armed with statistics and the full armor of Satan, because they have allowed the demonic angel of darkness into their hearts. The mad-dog liberals always defeat the classical liberals because they follow that which is within, while the classical liberals, the conservatives, follow that which is without, an abstract God who cannot sustain a man in the day of battle. If liberals demand statistical data to decide whether a nation that has never been Christian and is committed to the ideals of Jacobin France and Stalinist Russia is good or evil, then they have already told you they are beyond the ken of all things human. Why then do the conservatives try to deal with them? You can’t expect to convert the devil, you can only oppose him as our Lord did when he was tempted by him in the desert.

Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil.
And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an hungred.
And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,
And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.
Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;
And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.
Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him.

Matthew 4: 1-11

The conservatives caved in to the temptation of the devil. Our Lord refused to give the devil empirical evidence of His divinity by casting Himself down from the pinnacle of the temple. So they, the conservatives, have taken it upon themselves to present their own miracle to Satan’s minions. They present their marvelous theories to the liberals, which are designed to dazzle them by their rational brilliance. But the liberals are never dazzled by the rational brilliance of the conservatives. They remain unmoved by the prolifers’ scientific proofs that the child in the womb is a living, breathing personality, and they remain adamantly opposed to the slightest suggestion that the Chinese communists created the Wuhan virus with malice aforethought, despite all the conservatives’ empirical evidence of the malice aforethought. Perhaps something besides an appeal to the liberals’ reason is necessary to defeat liberals. Where your treasure lies, so lies your heart. The liberals treasure their triune faith, which is diametrically opposed to Christ’s reign of charity. They will make common cause with any individual or group that attacks Christ through His people – the Chinese communists, the Moslems, the Jews, the colored savages – all are a treasured part of Liberaldom. You can’t, Mr. Conservative, defeat the liberals by showing them how irrational they are. The liberals are rational: they have made a rational decision to defend the faith that is within them — the hatred of Christ and His people – with the cold, rational malignity of the devil. You can’t deal with creatures who hate with that intensity by reasoning with them or appealing to their compassionate nature; those who worship Satan have left compassion behind. You must have something inside, you must have Christ inside, in order to fight the devil and his minions.

The liberals, with an unerring instinct to destroy even the symbolic remains of Christian Europe, have dug up Nathan Bedford Forrest’s and his wife’s remains in order to remove them from hallowed ground. Lee and Stonewall Jackson were great heroes and should always be honored by white Europeans, but Forrest was a hero who stood above them all. I doubt if he ever read Burke, but he was the one man who understood, as Burke understood, that the enemy, the Jacobin liberals, could not be dealt with as if they were Europeans who still remained within the fold of Christ, the Good Shepherd. They were a new breed of unmen who scorned that charity of honor which once was the distinguishing mark of the European. The European civilization of I Corinthians 1:13, the civilization that the theologians tell us never existed, only existed as a civilization in the North American hemisphere in the nation that Nathan Bedford Forrest defended. He was the last fairytale knight of old Europe. It is quite fitting, from Satan’s viewpoint, that he and his wife should be posthumously tried and condemned by the liberal Sanhedrin who hate all those men and women who loved Christ in and through their people.

The liberals and their allies in the organized churches (Pope Francis the blasphemer recently issued a happy Ramadan to the Moslems) have decreed that white people are the major source of evil in the world. And in a certain sense they are right – they, the liberals who have repudiated their European heritage, are the major source of evil in the world. But those other whites, the white people of old Europe who loved Christ, were they evil? That is what the illuminati tell us, but I don’t see my people with the mind of an illuminati; I see my people through the interior eye of the heart. And there I see faith, hope, and charity. Christ entered human history so that we could be part of His story, which is the story of, “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son.” We cannot separate ourselves from the people who took Christ into their hearts, who became part of His story, without losing our souls. The white race is the Christ-bearing race. Even the white grazers who have lost a clear vision of our Lord still show us every time there is a crisis such as a plague, flood, or famine that it is only white people who know what charity is. It is only the liberals, who make war with their heathen allies against the white race, that have not charity because they have repudiated their people, the people who saw a great light.

In Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew, the shrew, Katherina, has taken herself out of our Lord’s loving embrace. She will not serve Him through the channels of grace He has provided. She wants autonomy from all divine-human restraints. But she gradually becomes aware of how His grace works through human channels. And in her submission to her husband, she submits to our Lord:

Such duty as the subject owes the prince,
Even such a woman oweth to her husband;
And when she is froward, peevish, sullen, sour,
And not obedient to his honest will,
What is she but a foul contending rebel
And graceless traitor to her loving lord?—
I am asham’d that women are so simple
To offer war where they should kneel for peace,
Or seek for rule, supremacy, and sway,
When they are bound to serve, love, and obey.
Why are our bodies soft and weak and smooth,
Unapt to toil and trouble in the world,
But that our soft conditions and our hearts

Should well agree with our external parts?
Come, come, you froward and unable worms!
My mind hath been as big as one of yours,
My heart as great, my reason haply more,
To bandy word for word and frown for frown;
But now I see our lances are but straws,
Our strength as weak, our weakness past compare,
That seeming to be most which we indeed least are
.

The modern conservative needs to see that his reason is not what our Lord wants: He wants our hearts. If we love much we will know how to deal with evil dwarfs and their liberal minions.

The insufficiency of abstract reason to combat liberalism was brought home to me recently when I saw an exchange between a conservative and a liberal, who were discussing the Chinese method of dealing with the coronavirus. The liberal defended the Chinese purging of the virus by the murder of the victims of the virus. The classical liberal was appalled. But why was he appalled? If abstract reason is our touchstone of reality, isn’t it rational to kill the sick so that the healthy can live? The classical liberal, the modern conservative, is Ivan Karamazov. He makes abstract reason his God and then reserves the right to be appalled when Smerdyakov, acting on that premise, commits murder. If Christ be not risen, there is no reason why we should not commit murder for the greater good, the greater good being the biological survival of the herd. Let us step back into the divine narrative of His redemptive love. Our story must be, once again, interwoven with His story. There is indeed, “A Land of Pure Delight,” but we cannot get there except through Him, the Christ of old Europe, whom the liberals mock and the men of reason regard as a poetical triviality, fit for fireside tales at Christmas time but not suited for the serious business of life. Let us shun that rationalism, which is the true plague, and embrace His realm of charity, which passeth the understanding of abstract reason.+

Posted in Charity, Christian Europe, Fairy tale mode of understanding, Rationalism | Tagged , | Comments Off on Sweet Fields Beyond the Plague of Rationalism

A Different Realm

Jesus before Caiaphas – Rembrandt

I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me. –John 17: 23

___________________________________

It has become abundantly clear in this coronavirus crisis that the liberals’ concern is not for the well-being of the American people, black, white, or other. If they were concerned about actual human beings, they would stop the virus in its tracks in the nursing homes by firing all the low-wage illegal immigrant custodial staffs and authorizing the use of the hydroxychloroquine drug at the beginning of the illness, not right before the hour of death. And secondly, they would not shut down businesses that are in safe areas, which constitute most businesses in the United States. What is largely a problem for New York City should not become a problem for the whole nation. And thirdly, they would not use science as a God word to scare the living hell out of people who are at their mercy in a ‘crisis’ such as this.

Let me dwell on that third point. I avoid both the liberals and the conservatives (the classical liberals), because both groups place an inordinate emphasis on man’s abstract reason, independent of an indwelling spiritual connection to Christ. I don’t want to listen to the narrative of either camp, because I don’t want to be drawn into their orbits. The classical liberal generally says kind things about Christianity, and the non-classical liberal says bad things about Christianity, but both parties do not believe, as I believe, that it is the Christian heart, not the abstract intellect that will guide us safely through the labyrinth of existence. So in all things spiritual I do not consult liberals of either the classical or mad-dog liberal mold.

Christians of old Europe used to see themselves as spiritual entities who had to pay attention to their biological outer crust for the sake of the spiritual essence within. It is quite different with the classical liberal and the mad-dog liberal: they believe that nature is all. The antique European rejects that biological view of existence, but there are times when he must rely, to some extent, on the wisdom of the mere nature experts, those who have come to be called the men of science. For instance, if you have a medical problem or if you need to know when a plague is a plague or not, you need someone who knows a little more about science and medicine than you do. But what if the men of science have no conscience? What if they believe, not in “through Christ and in Christ,” but in man’s god-like reason abstracted from the living God? Then, as Ludwig von Drake says, “You’ve got a horrible mess.”

Even in the case of the coronavirus plague, what seems like merely a matter of accumulating the scientific facts is not just a matter of accumulating the scientific facts. Our vision of existence, our spiritual core, even if that core consists of no spiritual substance, will determine how we marshal and interpret the ‘scientific facts.’ That is why there are such divergent views in the scientific community regarding this recent plague, or this recent flu, depending on which authority you believe.

Let me, a non-scientific expert, highlight the problems of a European Everyman during a ‘crisis’ such as we now face: Because I believe, as Burke believed, that if you “suffer any person to tell us his story, morning and evening, but for one twelvemonth, he will become our master,” I do not pay much attention to the liberals’ or the classical liberals’ news sites. So I heard about the coronavirus rather late from one of my sons, who informed me of it. My reaction to the news was much like my reaction when I have just settled down for a long winter’s nap and I hear some kind of commotion on the street in front of my house – “I suppose I’d better get up and see what is happening, because it is right in front of my house.” Like it or not the coronavirus was coming and I had to make certain decisions about it.

So I listened to the various news outlets, news outlets that I usually avoid. With only one exception, Rush Limbaugh, the authorities, both conservative and liberal, said that what was coming was a plague of Biblical proportions. A whole host of scientific and medical experts were projecting death rates that indicated the end of the world. What is an Everyman, a non-expert, to make of such predictions? Do you curl up in a fetal position and refuse to leave your bed? Do you run out in the streets and leap in front of the first speeding car you see? Do you assume sackcloth and ashes and start doing the penances that you always resolved to do someday, but just not today? Or do you do none of the above, and disregard the scientific experts?

I was aided by a certain skepticism in regard to medical experts that I acquired in my early teens, as a result of my interest in weight training. I read Strength and Health magazine, published by the father of American weight-lifting, Bob Hoffman. Mr. Hoffman regularly criticized the medical establishment for their lack of attention to good nutrition and exercise. I came to believe that, “Doctors be all swabs,” and that there was no illness, except one’s final death, that could not be cured by exercise and/or diet. Subsequent events, particularly once I became a father of children, forced me to alter my opinion of doctors – sometimes they were necessary, and all health problems could not be solved by diet and exercise. But I still retained a certain distrust of what the ‘medical experts’ proclaimed; if doctors were not essentially evil as I first believed, they were still not the infallible gods that my fellow countrymen believed them to be.

Hence, I did not quite believe the scientific prophesies of doom that were being so authoritatively bandied about. Now it appears that the medical experts were not experts, they were humbugs in the service of the liberals who wanted there to be a perception that there was a plague so that they could move toward their final solution, the extermination of the white race, at an accelerated pace.

If we grant what has now become obvious, that this virus is not the greatest plague in the history of mankind, what then do we make of it? Some of the conservatives who were screaming pandemic, gloom, gloom and doom, are now saying it was all a hoax. But can they be trusted? Is it an either/or, is it either a pandemic of global proportions or a hoax? Most certainly the food lines and the unemployment have been created by the hoax of the ‘global pandemic.’ But is this a serious illness that warrants some special measures? Perhaps the school and church closings in certain urban areas were warranted. This flu does seem to be more serious than most, although I can’t even be sure of that, because the medical experts have an agenda, a liberal agenda, that they are pushing. So the central problem during this ‘crisis’ is the central problem that a European Everyman faces every day of his life in modern Europe. How can he trust leaders who have rejected Christ as the lodestar of Western civilization?

I concede that in medicine and certain public health issues we must be cognizant of the fact that a man has a biological nature. But if we make abstract reason contemplating man’s biological nature our touchstone of reality, instead of an indwelling spirit, the indwelling spirit of Christ, we will live our lives according to the statistics of the scientists. The most depressing aspect of this ‘pandemic’ is the willingness of conservatives and liberals to base their cases for/or against – panic or hoax – on statistics that ignore individual human beings. For instance, you don’t approvingly cite the Swedes’ ‘herd immunity’ plan even if it flattens their curve. They are murdering their elderly. And you don’t cite the statistics of the coronavirus deaths in urban locations in order to impoverish and starve human beings living in rural areas by ‘shutting them down.’ We have lost our vision of the God-Man, Jesus Christ, the non-utilitarian God who loves particular human beings, not abstract statistics.

“That’s rebellion,” Alyosha said softly.

“Rebellion? I wish you hadn’t used that word,” said Ivan feelingly. “I don’t believe it’s possible to live in rebellion, and I want to live! Tell me yourself–I challenge you: let’s assume that you were called upon to build the edifice of human destiny so that men would finally be happy and would find peace and tranquility. If you knew that, in order to attain this, you would have to torture only one single creature, let’s say the little girl who beat her chest so desperately in the outhouse, and that on her unavenged tears you could build that edifice, would you agree to do it? Tell me and don’t lie!”

“No, I would not,” Alyosha said softly.

-The Brothers Karamazov

Christ stood before a tribunal, a tribunal presided over by the high priest of Judaism, and He was condemned as a blasphemer because He said that He was God incarnate. But there was a people who saw, in the humiliated and crucified Christ, the Savior of the world. The European people’s descent into hell, their abandonment of the vision of the God-Man is a tragedy far greater than this so-called pandemic. The pandemic crisis is in fact part of the ongoing attack against Christ. Once Christ was brought before the tribunal of man’s abstract reason, first by the religious atheists, the scholastics in the Catholic and Protestant churches, then by the outright atheists, the Voltaires and the Shaws, He was condemned again. He has been found wanting by the men of statistics, the philosophers, theologians, and scientists. And He has been condemned as a blasphemer by the liberals. Both groups, the religious atheists and the outright atheists, have told us that Christ is a liar. The theological atheist has felt the need, like Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor, to rework the Christ story because Christ did not return to earth as He promised. And the liberal has felt free to look to a new trinity more in keeping with the needs of modern man. St. Paul stands in contradiction to both camps — he claimed that he lived “through Christ and in Christ.” He felt alive because the grace of God was alive inside of Him. That was also the faith of the European people: they saw, in their inmost hearts, the Savior that St. Paul encountered on the road to Damascus. Whatever is left in this world of God’s grace comes from human hearts which are not completely closed to St. Paul’s vision of that lonely figure, the son of the living God, standing before the religious atheists and the outright atheists of the Sanhedrin. Has Christ left us? No, we have left Him.

When Donald Trump went before the liberal Sanhedrin, the Fourth Estate, he was trying to include them in his mission of compassion. He was inviting them to join with him in the fight against the coronavirus, but the Sanhedrin wanted no part of Trump’s mission. They wanted to condemn Trump, because they view him as the font of all evil: He is a white man, and as such a creature he has a connection to the God-Man whom they hate. The ‘press conferences’ became min-trials at which Trump was always found guilty. Haven’t we, the remnant band of Christian Europeans, faced such tribunals in our lives? The home schooling parent, the politically incorrect teacher, the blogger who has been condemned for ‘hate speech,’ the anti-abortion protestor, and every other man, woman, or child who has deviated from the norms of the liberals have felt the wrath of the modern defenders of Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth.

A drowning man will grasp at any life preserver he can, so I do not blame the whites who have been thrown out of work and impoverished by the liberals’ coronavirus onslaught for organizing protests in the name of their civil liberties. But there are no civil liberties outside of Christian Europe. There is no freedom, no civil liberty, in a republic dedicated to Satan. It is only when we see liberalism for what it is, and Christ for what He is, that we will have the grace, the will, and the heart, to depose Satan who currently rules the European nations through his liberal minions.

We can’t reason with demons. The liberals are not misinformed, they know what they are doing when they withhold medicine from those who are ill in order to inflate the pandemic statistics. And they know what they are doing when they ‘close down’ people’s livelihoods. They are pure evil. We can’t fight them by way of demoncracy. We must see that we belong to another realm of existence, a realm of human hearts connected to His divine heart. Our prayer is always the non-liberal prayer, it is His prayer: “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.”+

Posted in Christ, Classical liberalism, Rationalism, Scientism | Tagged | Comments Off on A Different Realm

Shall Malice Bear Down Truth?

It is thus, and for the same end, that they endeavor to destroy that tribunal of conscience which exists independently of edicts and decrees. Your despots govern by terror. They know, that he who fears God fears nothing else; and therefore they eradicate from the mind, through their Voltaire, their Helvetius, and the rest of that infamous gang, that only sort of fear which generates true courage. Their object is, that their fellow citizens may be under the dominion of no awe, but that of their committee of research and of their lanterne. –Burke, A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

_________________

And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire. And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory. And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they gnawed their tongues for pain, And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds. –Book of Revelations 16: 8-11

________________________________________________________

In Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice Shylock seeks to use the law to cut the heart out of Antonio whom he hates because he is a Christian and because he lends money without charging interest. Shylock’s subterfuge is exposed and his bloody purpose is thwarted when Portia steps in and enforces the spirit of the law, which stands in stark contrast to Shylock’s twisted interpretation of the letter of the law.

The white grazers and the white conservatives have not yet come to the same conclusion as Portia came to – they do not see that behind the liberals’ façade of democracy and fairness is pure, dephlegmated evil. The liberals want to destroy the white grazers, not because the grazers are Christian as Antonio was, but because their ancestors once were Christian. Nothing will deter the liberals from pursuing their desired blood-path, no appeal to their better nature (they have none), no appeal to their sense of justice (they have none), and no appeal to their humanity (they have none) will avail.

I pray you, think, you question with the Jew.
You may as well go stand upon the beach
And bid the main flood bate his usual height;
You may as well use question with the wolf,
Why he hath made the ewe bleat for the lamb;
You may as well forbid the mountain pines
To wag their high tops and to make no noise
When they are fretten with the gusts of heaven;
You may as well do anything most hard,
As seek to soften that—than which what’s harder?—
His Jewish heart.


Merchant of Venice

The liberals have interiorized Satan’s hatred of the Christ-bearing race. They will not cease from their satanic course until the white race is destroyed. Their sacrificial altars must flow with the blood of white people in order to satisfy their internal bloodlust. “We will have sacrifice, not mercy,” is the war cray of the liberals.

The grazer cannot see the evil of the liberals because he has been spiritually anesthetized by intellectual Christianity in the churches, which is religious atheism, and by democracy, which is a system of government conceived in hell and dedicated to the proposition that everything humane and Christian is undemocratic and therefore evil. Hence the grazer has nowhere to turn. He can’t turn to organized Christian atheism to find redress for the evils of democracy, because organized Christian atheism has decreed that Christian Europe was not Christian Europe, it was racist and sexist Europe and its people are damned. Their descendants must repent, they must become liberal, or else they too will be damned. So the grazers put on sackcloth and ashes and return to democracy. And there they are told the same thing: you must show true contrition by democratically consenting to your own destruction.

The liberals’ ‘take no prisoners’ assault on the white race through the coronavirus crisis is the result of the white grazers’ refusal to self-destruct by way of democracy. They voted for a man, a Prometheus, who wanted to keep them alive. The Fourth Estate’s vicious attacks on Trump are attacks on the constituency that he represents, white people begging for a chance to live and breathe within the confines of a charnel house dedicated to Satan. If you cannot see that the liberals’ hatred of Trump, which is a hatred so intense that it can have only one source, is an attack on the Christ-bearing race you are either a liberal yourself or else you are a spiritually anesthetized grazer. No man can stand up to the satanic hatred that Trump has had to endure. No man should have to. What did he do to warrant such hatred? He took pity on white people — that is what he did. The liberals’ attack on Trump is an attack on thee and me. Every single death from the coronavirus is a result of the liberals’ refusal to stop all dealings with the Chinese communists. And how can you look at the unemployment lines and the food lines without feeling pity for the whites in those lines and hatred for the liberals who have brought such devastation among us? When Ariel relates the sufferings of the refugees on the island, he says to Prospero –

That if you now beheld them, your affections
Would become tender.
Prospero. Does thou think so, spirit?
Ariel. Mine would, sir, were I human.
Prospero. And mine shall.
Hast thou, which art but air, a touch, a feeling,
Of their afflictions, and shall not myself,
One of their kind, that relish all as sharply
Passion as they, be kindlier mov’d than thou art?

The Tempest

The conservative Olympians in church and state have not come down from Mt. Olympus to defend Prometheus or the people for whom he stole the electoral fire because they do not believe there is a bond between them and the white race. They have no kith and kin, they are pure mind. What is needful, in their minds, is an intelligence that is above human passions and sentimental attachments. They do not believe in the old notion of, “One of their kind.” And that philosophy makes them useless in the battle that is raging, the battle of Satan and his liberal minions against the white race, which once championed the God-Man, Jesus Christ.

Rush Limbaugh is one of the few conservatives who has stepped down from Mt. Olympus to support Trump. He recently stated that the liberals have lost all control of themselves. Their hatred of Trump has reached the level of insanity. That is true, but I would change ‘insanity’ to ‘satanic.’ And I would add that the liberals have always been satanic, but now they no longer are capable of hiding their passionate hatred of Christ and His people. What has Trump done that has drawn the liberals out? We must deal with their hatred because we should take pity on Trump and any man who is facing what he is facing, and we must deal with the liberals’ hatred because it is not just directed at Trump, it is directed at every single white who will not agree to the destruction of the white race. And that really is the crux of the matter. Yes, the liberals are angry because they thought the election was a done deal, and they saw it wrested away just as it was in their grasp. But they have lost before and managed to control their emotions and wait for the next election. What made Trump’s victory different? First and foremost, he did not accept the ruling premise of liberalism that the white race must self-destruct. He was not and is not a white supremacist, which is a pity because the white supremacy that the liberals abhor simply means that whites should love their own people, but he is not a believer in the liberals’ doctrine of “The white race must perish.” And the second reason that Trump has made the liberals take off their masks and reveal themselves in all their satanic fury is that Trump has shown a sincere Christian desire to stop legalized infanticide. The demons who run our nation cannot tolerate such an outrage. And they will rage, rage against even one small ray of light in the dark night that they have worked so hard to spread over the face of the earth.

Theoretically we are governed by a system of checks and balances with a judiciary, a Congress, and a chief executive. That theory is incorrect. We are governed by the Fourth Estate, which consists of an intellectual elite – academics, journalists, media pundits, scientists, and the usual assortment of psychiatrists and sociologists. That Fourth Estate is in reality a fifth column. They do everything in their power to break down any and every regime that ‘stinks’ of Christianity. They always support regicide in the name of liberty, equality, and fraternity.

What direction the French spirit of proselytism is likely to take, and in what order it is likely to prevail in the several parts of Europe, it is not easy to determine. The seeds are sown almost every where, chiefly by newspaper circulations, infinitely more efficacious and extensive than ever they were. And they are a more important instrument than generally is imagined. They are a part of the reading of all, they are the whole of the reading of the far greater number. There are thirty of them in Paris alone. The language diffuses them more widely than the English, though the English too are much read. The writers of these papers indeed, for the greater part, are either unknown or in contempt, but they are like a battery in which the stroke of any one ball produces no great effect, but the amount of continual repetition is decisive. Let us only suffer any person to tell us his story, morning and evening, but for one twelvemonth, and he will become our master. –Burke, Thoughts on French Affairs

Trump’s ‘victory’ was not a victory because he can do nothing to supplant the liberal Fourth Estate that rules our nation and all the European nations. But Trump’s crucifixion has shown those who have eyes to see the truth about liberals – they are demonic. This is the fourth outbreak of the liberals’ naked-fist demonism; the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, and the Northern war of extermination in the 1860’s were the other three. Will it just be business as usual when the coronavirus war is over? We cannot know such things for certain, but it appears highly unlikely that the white grazers will repudiate intellectual Christianity or democracy in order to embrace His Europe. (1)

We always will believe a lie when we accept the enemy’s definitions of existence. The liberals’ death wish is not a death wish. They will surely die from their attempt to strike out at God through the white race. But in attacking the white race, the liberals think they are fleeing from death. In their minds Christ represents pain, suffering, and death. The hard-eyed atheist, George Bernard Shaw, excoriated Christianity as the cruelest of all religions. What is cruel about Christianity? We are not promised a kingdom of God on earth, we are not promised lives devoid of suffering and death. It is the liberals’ hope that science, their Holy Ghost, can relieve them from suffering. But what about death? Can the abstract intellect of man, the noble black savage, or science save them from the death they seek to avoid by rejecting Jesus Christ? It would seem, from a Christian perspective, that the liberals’ flight from Christ does not free them from death, it only places them with the swine as they go over the cliff. However, if a man foreshortens his vision, if he focuses only on the ecstatic moment, on the demonic fire within, he can convince himself that death cannot overtake him so long as he avoids the God-man. Is that insanity? No, it is something even larger than insanity, it is pure demonism. And that is the inner dynamic of liberalism. The liberals have interiorized the hatred of Christ. They cannot be defeated by intellectual Christians or democracy-loving conservatives. They can only be defeated by a people who have interiorized the love of Christ, the love of Him who died on the cross to save us from sin and death. Such people will hate where they should hate: they will hate the liberals and all their works; and they will love where they should love: they will love His people and fight to perpetuate His reign of charity here on earth rather than conserving Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth.

The lack of His influence in the European nations is crystal clear when we look at the European governments’ willingness to trade with the communist Chinese. Aren’t such trade deals, in which China receives most favored nation status, a direct deal with the devil? What can we say of a people who willingly trade with the devil? In this coronavirus crisis, the devil that the liberals worship has once again shown himself to be a liar. We were supposed to recognize Red China because, ‘You can’t just ignore a whole country.’ So the eager capitalists and their liberal allies dealt with China; it was the practical, worldly thing to do. Was it right? No, it wasn’t, but what is right is never practical, so we were and are told. But now the devil has betrayed his minions. The juggling fiend has brought them down in the practical realm as well as in the spiritual realm. He has ruined their economies. Will it make a difference? Will the Demon-crats be held accountable for trafficking with Satan? They most certainly will be held accountable at the last judgement, but I doubt that there will be a reckoning in any court of justice in this world, because our modern courts of justice are courts of injustice: they are liberal courts. What justice there is in this world comes by way of men with hearts connected to Him, not by way of men with minds connected to intellectual Christianity and democracy. The hero in C. S. Lewis’s novel Perelandra is given the rare privilege of coming face to face in single combat with Satan, and he is able to fight without holding back. Perhaps, now that the liberals have become so openly satanic we too will be called upon to fight them without holding back. If we fight in His name, if we interiorize our love of the Jesus whom the liberals hate, they will face an army like they have never faced before. And by the grace of God, we shall conquer. Tis a consummation, a victory, devoutly to be wished. +

______________________

(1) The two great commandments of the Fourth Estate are – ‘Stay home’ and ‘Wash your hands.’ But if I’m staying home because the coronavirus is out there and not in my home, why must I wash my hands one-hundred times a day? Because I ponder such existential paradoxes, and because I grew up hearing radical sixties’ folk songs about Billy Joe McCallister and answers that were blowing in the wind, I took the time to compose a new-old folk song for the coronavirus era. To be sung to the tune of Blowing in the Wind:

How many months can a man stay at home,
Before he jumps off a bridge?
REFRAIN
The answer my friend,
Is blowing in the coronavirus wind,
The answer is blowing in the coronavirus wind.

How many times can a man wash his hands,
And still retain his skin?
REFRAIN
The answer my friend,
Is blowing in the coronavirus wind,
The answer is blowing in the coronavirus wind.

And for how many years will white people hide in their homes,
And pretend the liberals are their friends?
REFRAIN
The answer my friend,
Is blowing in the coronavirus wind,
The answer is blowing in the coronavirus wind.

Posted in Christ, Democracy, Grazers, Religion of Satan | Tagged , | Comments Off on Shall Malice Bear Down Truth?

Out of the Shadows

As a rood was I raised up; I bore aloft the mighty King, the Lord of heaven; I durst not stoop.

– “The Dream of the Rood”

___________________________

When I was a child growing up in the 1950’s my parents allowed me to watch a television show called Captain Kangaroo. The star of the show wore a captain’s uniform with big pockets like a kangaroo’s pouch. I knew that Captain Kangaroo was not really a kangaroo, even as a child, but it wasn’t until I got older that I discovered Captain Kangaroo was not a captain. I think I should be forgiven my naiveté about Captain Kangaroo’s false identity, because after all I was only a child. But what are we to make of seemingly grown-up people who regard the World Health Organization as a world health organization? It is quite obvious that the W.H.O. is a branch of the Chinese communists’ war department, a war department that is concerned not with world health, but with death and destruction. So again, what do we make of people who defend that organization? Are they just naïve, as I was naïve when I thought Captain Kangaroo was a captain? No, that is not the case; they are not children. Are they stupid? No, that is not the case either. Are they morally blind because they have rejected the light of the world? Yes, that is the case. “There are none so blind as those who will not see.” All liberals refuse to see evil because they have given their souls to the evil angel of darkness who prowls about the world seeking the ruin of souls. Nothing can make them declare that the communist Chinese are evil, just as nothing will make them declare that legalized abortion, homosexual marriage, and the demonization of the white race is evil. They have crossed a moral Rubicon, and they do not plan on going back.

The white liberal — and there are no non-white liberals — has set himself against the white race because white Europeans once built a civilization dedicated to the Light of the world. No other people, as a people, loved so much that they saw, “His blood upon the rose?” Now that Old Europe has been condemned by the liberals and its reality has been denied by the churchmen, from what moral ground can the European Everyman condemn and fight Chinese communists, Muslim terrorists, black murderers, Aztec warriors and liberal adherents of Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth? They have no moral ground to stand on. The clergy bids them take comfort in a mind-forged God that is impersonal and forever changing, the colored heathens continue to rage against the white race simply because they are heathens who have never known the light, and the liberals attack the white race because the continued existence of white people gives them a vague fear of that which once was and they hope shall never be again. But is that hope a certainty? Can the liberals ever be sure that they have banished Christ from Europe forever? No, they can’t, which is why they attack the white race with a maniacal fury infinitely greater than the colored heathens’ rage.

I once had the misfortune to share a 45-minute train ride with a nun who was returning from some kind of Eastern mysticism conference where she met with mystics from the Orient. She shared her mystical experience of the divine oneness with me. I was in my mid-twenties, having fairly recently come to a belief in the Christ of the Gospels, of St. Paul, and of the antique Europeans. The nun’s ecumenical, mystical atheism sickened me. But I politely listened to her — perhaps I should have silenced her — as we rather slowly, all too slowly, made our way home. The woman finally became aware that I was not responding to her mystical rapture with the proper enthusiasm, so she asked me point blank what I thought. I told her. The substance of my response was the words of our Lord: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” We passed the rest of the way in silence.

We cometh to the Father through Christ, and we cometh to Christ through our humanity. If the people who took Christ into their hearts are damned, if they didn’t know Christ, to whom can we turn for the words of eternal life? The liberals tell us we can turn to them, to their triune faith, and the theologians tell us we can turn to their systematic theology or to their Chardinian mysticism. But we must not turn to the antique Europeans, we must not turn to the Word made flesh in Old Europe because, the theologians tell us, the Word never was made flesh in Old Europe; we cannot find the heart of Christ in that culture.

“As a history of the world, the empirical history after Christ is qualitatively not different from the history before Christ if judged from either a strictly empirical or a strictly Christian viewpoint.”

Karl Lowith’s words of ‘wisdom’ are not atypical. He presents the intellectuals’ Olympian view of Christian Europe: It never existed! All those men and women who lived and died with the vision of the Rood in their hearts never really existed, there is simply no evidence from an “empirical” or “strictly Christian” viewpoint of their existence. If we strike the words, “strictly Christian” and substitute the word “utopian,” we will come to the crux of the matter: There never was a Christian Europe unless that Christian Europe can be proven to be a utopian paradise. But such a paradise can never come about on this earth. And to denounce Christian Europe and her people because Christian Europe was not utopia leaves us bereft of our history and our hope in ages past. If the people who loved much did not show us the way to God, through the eyes of the heart, then how can we know God? “You can’t,” the theologians tell us. “Your God is a myth,” the liberals tell us. Then both sets of experts bid us turn to their intellects as a guide. What will happen if we reject the experts and return to the Dream of the Rood Europeans? We will recover our souls, we will respond to existence with the heartfelt passion of a people who have seen a great light in the depths of their heart.

The cold malignity of the thoroughbred metaphysician that Burke writes about has cast a pall, a satanic pall, over the European people. In this new phase of the war against the Christ-bearing people, the crisis of the communist Chinese virus, the liberals have made explicit what was always implicit in liberalism. The liberals hate humanity as Satan hates humanity. And the liberals most particularly hate white people because of their past connection to that “mysterious stranger” who died on a cross for our sins. Some conservatives have told me that the liberals have over-played their hands; they should not have been so explicit with their support of the Chinese communists, because now the American people will reject them. Is that true, will the blatant attack on the white race turn the white grazers against the liberals? No, it will not, because the “conservatives” are not conservative. Let us go back a few decades.

In 1949 the quintessential liberal, Arthur Schlesinger Jr., published a book called The Vital Center in which he criticized the far left progressives who would not admit that communism in Russia had failed and that communism posed a threat to liberal democracy. Such views in today’s political climate would mark Schlesinger as a conservative. But of course Schlesinger was not a conservative, he was the type of conservative that Dabney labeled “the shadow that follows Radicalism!” We can’t oppose communism in the name of liberal democracy, because liberal democracy and communism proceed from the same Jacobin roots. If we go deeper into Schlesinger’s book, we see just how thoroughly liberal he was. He denounced Burkean conservatism as “the ethical afterglow of feudalism… inappropriate in a non-aristocratic, dynamic, progressive business society of the United States.” Schlesinger wanted the same thing the far left progressives wanted, the kingdom of God on earth without God, but he favored a more moderate march, a less bloody march forward. And so it is with our modern “conservatives” who want to oppose the communists while preserving our “democratic ideals,” when it is our democratic ideals that have left us naked to our communist enemies and all the enemies of Christian Europe. If the white European Americans had been asked, “Do you want America to be overrun by Mexicans?”; if they had been asked, “Do you want your economy and your access to essential medical supplies to be dependent on the communist Chinese?”; and if they had been asked, “Do you want to allow a strong, Islamic presence in your country?”, do you think they would have voted ‘yes’ on any of those issues? Yet we have been invaded by Mexicans, we are dependent on the Chinese communists, and we do have a strong Islamic presence in our nation. Why? It is because the liberals do not frame their questions to the white grazers in terms of invasions and economic independence, they ask the question, “Do you want democracy and all the magnificent freedoms that come with democracy?” Then the grazers scream, “Give us Barabbas, give us democracy!” and Christ is crucified again through His people, who are crucified by the purveyors of democracy.

When this so-called pandemic started, which has turned out to be a flu like all other flus, great medical experts were telling us that we could no more stop this, the communist Chinese virus, than we could stop the wind. The ‘experts’ were really referring to liberalism, not to a virus. They were and are telling us that we shall not try to impede liberalism or we shall be punished. The shutdowns are not because of the virus, the shutdowns are punitive. To the liberals, Trump’s election represents an impediment to the forward march of the liberals. The disgusting white pigs who voted for him must be punished. And they are being punished. Look at the food lines, look at the unemployment figures. But we can’t turn to the conservatives who are the shadows of the liberals to save us. Stephen Tonsor, a 1960s conservative, echoed Schlesinger’s criticism of Burke, and even Richard Weaver castigated Burke for his rejection of forms in favor of the particular. Yes, Burke did reject formal theology and philosophy. He preferred a particular, personal God, the God of our ascending race, instead of the unknown God of philosophy and theology, and he preferred a particular people, the antique Europeans, to a universal aggregate called mankind. Burke’s and Dabney’s conservatism was grounded in our Dream of the Rood ancestors. That ground, the ground consecrated by the blood of Christ, is the ground we must stand on and never yield even though the liberals tell us we must yield or be crushed.

This communist Chinese virus attack has devastated the European people because they have turned their eyes away from the cross to that which is without, to science, reason, and the gods of nature. Our true faith lies within –

“Now I have joy of life that I can seek the triumphant cross alone more often than all men, do it full honour. Great is the desire for that in my heart, and to the cross I turn for help.”

It was not wrong to shut down the schools and churches in an attempt to stem the virus. God knows, considering what is taught in both places, it would be a great good to shut those twin towers of atheism down forever, but the liberals didn’t shut down the private businesses and the family gatherings because they wanted to help their people. They shut down businesses and family gatherings because they wanted to impoverish white people and drive them to despair. They used statistical aggregates to justify their treacherous onslaught. And the ‘conservative’ shadows of the liberals are no better. The conservatives are now pointing to Sweden as our model. (1) Sweden? The nation that has destroyed itself from within by handing their country over to Moslems? The nation that has made sexual perversion the law of the land? I don’t care about your statistics, Mr. Conservative, or your theories of the herd and the greater good – “Let us let the virus run its course.” The statistics of expedience belong in hell, in Satan’s kingdom of eternal night. We need to look to that which is within, to His kingdom come. Before Christ became a by-product of a syllogism, He was Our Lord and Savior who could, when seen with the eyes of the heart, guide us through an existential maze that our rational minds could not pass through. There is no ‘solution’ to the communist Chinese virus crisis from without. The solution lies within. ‘Dream of the Rood’ Europeans do not yield to statistics, plagues, or the devil’s minions. They still dream dreams and see the vision of Him who died on the cross to save them from sin and death. +

_____________________

(1) In Tom Brown’s School Days Thomas Hughes tells us that Dr. Arnold closed down Rugby for a term when a deadly virus was sweeping through the school. Arnold of Rugby was a Christian of the old school — he sought to do what Christ would have done. The Demon-crats did not close the schools and churches out of concern for the health of American citizens, they closed the schools and churches to get Trump. And they closed the white businesses and instituted house arrests in order to get white people. The Swedes did not keep their schools, churches, and businesses open to help white people. They didn’t have any Trump to get, so they decided, based strictly on utilitarian principles, to risk the lives of the expendable elderly whites in order to keep their satanic kingdom in working order. It is morally reprehensible, it is a sin without pardon, for ‘conservatives’ to laud the Swedish model. We cannot continue to look only at systems, without judging what is inside, at the heart of the systems we are supporting. Give us Christ, not Barabbas.

Posted in Christ, Classical liberalism, Democracy | Tagged | Comments Off on Out of the Shadows