Sorrowing, sighing, bleeding, dying, Sealed in the stone-cold Tomb.
-John Henry Hopkins, Jr.
__________
Ialways place more importance on anecdotal evidence than on statistical evidence, because anecdotal evidence comes from flesh and blood human beings, while statistical evidence comes from… I don’t know where it comes from – that is the problem with it. Over the years I’ve collected a large body of anecdotal evidence indicating that there is a huge discrepancy between the ruling liberal elite, which consists of the intellectuals in church and state, and the grazers. The grazers do the liberals’ bidding because the liberals are in power, but they don’t believe in racial Babylon with the same intensity as the liberals, which is why the grazer will say some things in private, once you have made the first anti-Babylonian remark, which suggests that the white everyman still has some light left in his soul. But the light soon fades, because the liberals have overmanned the grazer’s soul. When the grazer makes a criticism of the liberals’ multi-racial utopia, he feels guilty, like a man in olden days who might tell a dirty joke in the church parking lot. Of course, now dirty jokes are told from the church pulpits while ‘racist’ comments have become the parking lot dirty jokes.
The grazer submits to liberal rule, because he believes that intelligence is morality. To be willfully stupid, which means clinging to prejudices stemming from the traditions, manners, and customs of the antique Europeans, is morally wrong, because the Europeans of the past were racist and therefore stupid. (1) Thus the fear of being racist and unintelligent makes moral cowards of the white grazers. It was inevitable that Trump would become the candidate for ‘stupid’ people, because Trump, like Reagan before him, has dipped his little toe into the waters of prejudice and blood wisdom. It is only a little toe, but that little mite of reality is too much for the liberals, so they have brought out the propaganda machines to destroy Trump.
The Europeans will be losers so long as they continue to believe in democracy. A candidate such as Trump is not a leader who can lead his people out of the wilderness, but he does represent a significant rear guard for the retreating Europeans. They can use a rear guard, but then they must regroup and return to the fray, shorn of their moral cowardice and armed with the anti-democratic prejudices of their European forefathers.
Even if there was no Moslem menace, the black barbarian menace left unchecked is enough to destroy the European people. The Moslem onslaught is just another form of the same liberal attack against Christ and the Christ-bearing race. Have the liberals gone too far in this, their latest attack on the European people? There certainly has been more open criticism by the grazers of the liberals’ Moslem gambit than of any other liberal stratagem. Because I love my people and want them to survive, it is my deepest hope that the liberals have overplayed their hand and this liberal-sponsored Moslem invasion will trigger a white counter-revolutionary movement that will cleanse the European nations of liberalism. But in truth I don’t see that happening, because the opposition to the liberals’ Moslem initiative has been launched in the name of liberalism. Critics of the Moslem invasion have stressed the incompatibility of Islam and classical liberalism. The Moslems believe in mass rape, the Moslems believe in the murder of the infidel, the Moslems believe in a Moslem theocracy, and the list goes on and on. How can the liberals countenance such a religion that is seemingly against all they hold sacred? The answer is simple. The first liberal was the devil — very few liberals believe in the devil, but that is not important to the devil — what he wants is his will, and he wills the destruction of the Christ-bearing race. Any ideology opposed to the Christ-bearing race is therefore a good ideology. In that classic song of Tennessee Ernie Ford, “16 Tons,” he sings of one fist of iron and the other of steel: “If the right one don’t get you, the left one will.” Such is the plan of the devil: “If my colored barbarians don’t get you, the Moslems will.” The Moslems’ attack is largely against whites, because of their past connection to the Christian faith, but the Moslems have also launched attacks against non-white Christians in their own nations. This is one of the reasons the liberals have had a much harder time convincing the grazers of the innate goodness of the Moslems; they can’t cloak their support of the Moslems by claiming it is ‘racist’ and therefore stupid to oppose them. But the liberals’ Moslem narrative will ultimately prevail so long as the opposition keeps citing classical liberalism as the alternative to Islam. Liberalism in its classical form or in its modern, mad-dog form is from the devil, and we cannot seek redemption from the devil. If we do, we will end up like Macbeth, cursing the powers of darkness, who led us to our destruction:
And be these juggling fiends no more believ’d That palter with us in a double sense, That keep the word of promise to our ear, And break it to our hope.
Macbeth stepped outside of God’s grace in order to obtain a crown for his wife, a crown gotten through regicide. How can we oppose liberalism by invoking liberal principles? It is only when we break with the liberal, regicide governments of Europe that we can begin to climb out of the hellhole of multicultural death-in-life. In the works of Britain’s two greatest novelists, Walter Scott and Charles Dickens, there is almost always a character whom the evil-doers disregard as too stupid and inconsequential to be of any danger to them. But it is the stupid, inconsequential man who steps out of the shadows and defeats the evil-doers. It is the ‘stupid’ Quentin Durward who foils the evil Louis XI, and it is the comical, ineffectual Wilkins Micawber who foils the villainous Uriah Heep. This spiritual dynamic also occurs again and again in the European fairy tales. It is the third dumb brother who prevails where the ‘smart’ brothers fail, because the third dumb brother is pure of heart. And is not the origin of all the third dumb brother novels and fairy tales to be found in the story of our Lord and Savior? Was not Christ the inconsequential stone whom the builders rejected? Yes, He was. He was “despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief.” It was that Man, the Man of Sorrows, whom our people accepted as their Savior. “Angels above Him told us to love Him,” and our people did just that! They made a hero of the inconsequential babe in the manger, who grew up to be an ingloriously crucified criminal. “Is He your savior?” the smart men jeered. “Yes, He is our Lord and Savior,” the Europeans proclaimed with one voice. Away from the theologians who bid us look to their systems instead of Christ, away from the liberals who spit on the stupid, prejudiced Christians of old Europe, stands Christ. He is only an inconsequential shadow to the men and women of Liberaldom, but He is watching us, He is always watching us. And when we call on Him by name, He will step out of the shadows and lead us into battle.
There are ‘no-go’ zones in Europe where white Europeans dare not go, because the Moslems have taken over in those areas. In the United States there are thousands of black, no-go zones, where it is certain death for whites foolish enough to enter. Why are whites in retreat in their own nations? Isn’t it obvious? The rulers of the white nations have coalesced with the heathens and the barbarians of color to destroy the white race. And without a fighting faith, the whites are defenseless against the Moslem and colored onslaught. ‘The democratic way’ is not a fighting faith; ‘Three cheers for multiculturalism,’ is not a fighting faith. ‘By the Cross We Conquer,’ is a fighting faith.
It is time, past time, to acknowledge that white people are a conquered people, cowering and hiding in the lands that used to be their own. But there is no need to accept our conquered state as final. Now, when we seem like inconsequential weaklings, whose women are regarded as the property of heathens and colored barbarians and whose men are regarded as cowards, is the time to strike back. The world belongs to the Christ-bearing people; nothing will be denied them providing they leave the belly of the liberal leviathan and take up the banner of Christ crucified, Christ risen.
Burke saw what was coming. The devil was in the midst of us. In the form of a gigantic vulture, he spread his wings over all of Europe and remade Christendom into Liberaldom. He was unopposed, because he neutralized the opposition. Burke’s rejection by his own party was symptomatic of all of Europe’s reaction to liberalism. To oppose utopia was to oppose science, democracy, and the universal brotherhood of man. But how can there be a universal brotherhood of man when we deny our common hope? The headlong flight of the demon-possessed swine, their flight from the living God, led them over a cliff. That is what liberalism represents, the flight of the swine. That image, of the swine going over the cliff, should be on all the flags of Europe, so long as Europeans bend their knees to the satanic vulture.
Who will turn from that vulture of death? The men of blood, the last Europeans, will not bow down to Satan. Late at night in secret spots, in caves, in basements, and in deserted, wooded places where the utopian liberals formerly planned their revenges on Christian men, the Christian men will plan their counter-attack. This Christmas I heard a white choir perform “We Three Kings of Orient Are” in a very fast, martial style. The words, “sorrowing, sighing, bleeding, dying,” took on an added significance when sung in that style. For me, the song became a Christian counter-revolutionary song. Is Christ, the inconsequential man of sorrows, the leader who will lead us out of the liberals’ utopian hell? Yes, He is.
Glorious now, behold Him arise, King and God, and Sacrifice! Heaven sings Alleluia! Alleluia! the earth replies.
And if that sounds too fantastic for white men, it is because they have suffered from an intellectual contraction of the blood for the past 100 years. Once their hearts reconnect with Christian Europe they will no longer fear the liberals and their murderous heathen and colored allies. It will be time for Satan’s multitudinous legions to fear Europeans, the men who were born to champion the sorrowing, sighing, bleeding, dying God who was rejected and remains rejected by the builders of a utopian hell on earth. +
___________________________________
(1) It never ceases to amaze and disgust me when I see and hear European clergymen joining in the liberal chorus that sings an unending hymn of hatred, hatred of the antique Europeans. If they hate the people who were closest to Christ and want to eradicate their culture and their descendants from the face of the earth, then what should we conclude? They serve the liberals who fly the swinish flag of Satan.
Thy bosom is endeared with all hearts, Which I by lacking have supposed dead; And there reigns love and all love’s loving parts, And all those friends which I thought buried. How many a holy and obsequious tear Hath dear religious love stolen from mine eye, As interest of the dead, which now appear But things remov’d, that hidden in thee lie! Thou art the grave where buried love doth live, Hung with the trophies of my lovers gone, Who all their parts of me to thee did give; That due of many now is thine alone: Their images I lov’d I view in thee, And thou (all they) hast all the all of me.
–William Shakespeare
_____
“Pause,” says a low voice. “Nothing? Think!”
“On Christmas Day, we will shut out from our fireside, Nothing.”
“Not the shadow of a vast City where the withered leaves are lying deep?” the voice replies. “Not the shadow that darkens the whole globe? Not the shadow of the City of the Dead?”
Not even that. Of all days in the year, we will turn our faces towards that City upon Christmas Day, and from its silent hosts bring those we loved, among us. City of the Dead, in the blessed name wherein we are gathered together at this time, and in the Presence that is here among us according to the promise, we will receive, and not dismiss, thy people who are dear to us!
–Charles Dickens
__________
This remembrance has been written based on the letters of Arthur Walker and James Miller. It is a Christmas story and an Easter story, as all genuine European stories are.
_______________________________
Act I. Scene 1. The Kenyan Hinterlands.
[The setting is the small home of Mr. and Mrs. Drayton. Mr. Drayton is an Anglican missionary.]
[Rev. Arthur Walker knocks on the door.]
Rev. Samuel Drayton: Come in.
Walker: I’m sorry to bother you, Reverend, but I was hoping for a little guidance from someone…
Drayton: A little older?
Walker: I was going to say someone wiser than I am.
Drayton: It’s nice to be thought of in that way. I’ll try to live up to your confidence. What can I help you with?
Walker: Well, Reverend, I’ve been here in Kenya for 14 months, and I just don’t feel that I’m connecting with the natives.
Drayton: I don’t quite follow you. Could you be more specific?
Walker: No, I can’t. It’s just that I don’t feel that anything of a Christian nature is going on between me and the natives. I preach, I administer the sacraments, and I share the work load with the men, but there is something missing. I just don’t feel my presence among them brings any of them closer to Christ.
Drayton: Perhaps – and I don’t mean this as a criticism – you are too focused on yourself, on what you feel. It’s not up to us, you know; we are just vessels of God’s grace.
Walker: I don’t mean this response to seem flippant, Reverend, but I don’t feel like a vessel of God’s grace to these natives. God might be transmitting, but it’s not getting through.
Drayton: May I ask you why you became a minister and why you chose to be a missionary?
Walker: When I entered the military in 1943 I was 18. The last thing I was thinking of was the ministry, but after a year of serving in North Africa, in some of the worst battles, I was sent home all shot up. My intent was to recover in the London-based hospital that I was sent to and then return to the war. For six months I wasn’t well enough to leave the hospital, but once I was well enough to start hobbling around London I took advantage of the opportunity and saw a good deal of the city that I had only seen twice in my life before the war started. You see, my Dad was a barkeep in Bristol, that’s where I was born and raised. Well, one day I wandered into St. John’s when the Reverend Christopher Grey was preaching. He wasn’t fire and brimstone like I was used to – my parents were independents – he was something more than fire and brimstone. It’s hard to describe the effect he had on me. It was like I was a little child at a parade, and he was lifting me up so I could see what the parade was all about. Only with the Reverend Grey it wasn’t a parade that he was lifting me up to see, it was Christ.
Drayton: Reverent Grey was an eloquent preacher and writer.
Walker: You said “was” – is he dead?
Drayton: No, as far as I know, he is still alive. He even visited Kenya a few years ago, but he was forbidden to perform any services in the Anglican Church. He is no longer, even though he was not defrocked, a member in good standing of the Anglican Church.
Walker: Yes, I know about that. I wish I had contacted him in those years after the war. But I had my undergraduate degree to study for and then divinity school and…
Drayton: It’s just as well you didn’t contact him.
Walker: Why do you say that?
Drayton: Because I knew the man. He was not a close friend – he was older than me and I’ve been here in Kenya for 27 years – but I did meet him on several occasions, and I’ve known friends of his…
Walker: And?
Drayton: He’s not quite right in the head. Oh, I know about his personality – he is quite a spellbinder, quite intense – but I still insist that he is not quite right in the head. He probably should have been a soldier or a pugilist or something, certainly not a clergyman.
Walker: But Reverent, he…
Drayton: Yes, I know he lifted you up to see Christ. But we often, when we are young in the faith, are easily impressed by personalities rather than substance. Look at the Reverend Grey’s life. He has been involved in fisticuffs – there was an incident when he threw an elderly man into a fountain – and there was a suspicion that when he was here in Kenya he was involved in a massacre of some of the natives.
Walker: In fairness, that was never proved, and even if the rumor is true, I also heard that the “natives” were Mau Maus.
Drayton: The Mau Maus are still Kenyans, and they are still human beings created in the image of God. Surely you don’t deny that?
Walker: I don’t know what I feel about the natives. They are a mystery to me, the mystery of evil.
Drayton: That is nonsense. You are too absolute in your thinking. Good and evil are old, hide-bound concepts.
Walker: I don’t quite follow you, Reverend. Isn’t Christ, the Son of God, good, and isn’t Satan, the archangel, evil?
Drayton: I think that is where you and Grey make your mistake. Our concept of God changes over time, and we must adjust our vision.
Walker: That’s a rather depressing thought, Reverend. Do you mean to say that Christ is not the Son of God?
Drayton: Oh no, I think Christ is the son of God, but not in the old way. He is the son of God as we are all called to be sons of God; it’s just that Christ fully recognized his son-ship.
Walker: I see. Is that what you’ve been preaching to the natives for the past 26 years?
Drayton: Yes, I’ve told them that they are all sons of God.
Walker: That’s blasphemy, Reverend.
Drayton: You surprise me, Reverend Walker. I thought your theology was more sophisticated. I’m sorry to hear that your faith is frozen in the dark ages.
Walker: I don’t think I belong here in Africa.
Drayton: You mean you don’t think you belong here with me.
Walker: Both. Faith is a precious thing, Reverend. If I believed as you do I couldn’t go on living.
Drayton: Aren’t you being a bit overly dramatic? I don’t ask that you give up your faith. I just want to elevate your faith, so that you can see beyond an anthropomorphic God to a universal God who embraces all of mankind, people of all colors.
Walker: Why can’t all races embrace Christ, the Christ that St. Paul encountered on the road to Damascus?
Drayton: That Christ is too ethnically European; we need a Christ who is all things to all people.
Walker: Tell me, what is Christ to the Mau Maus?
Drayton: You seem obsessed with Mau Maus. They are merely helping their black brothers to throw off the white man’s oppression. Kenya is in the process of becoming an all-black state. When the Mau Maus see that Kenya is restored, they will settle down.
Walker: Do you believe that?
Drayton: Of course I do. I’ve lived with these people for the last 26 years. I believe in their innate goodness.
Walker: I believe the exact opposite. I believe that their black skins conceal black hearts. The better ones could be guided to something besides Mau Mau if you got them out from under the thumbs of the witch doctors, but you can’t get them away from the witch doctors. They attend Christian services during the day, and the witch doctors’ unholy rites at night. And that’s the best of them. The vast majority show open contempt for Christianity. They only tolerate our presence here, because of the food and medical supplies we can provide them with.
Drayton: All of this you’ve discovered in only fourteen months?
Walker: Yes.
Drayton: That’s quite remarkable, but let me suggest another possibility. I would suggest that you came here with preconceived, European ideas about what a good Christian should be. And when these pure, simple people didn’t measure up to your European notions of Christianity, you became bitter and resentful and painted them, in your own mind, as savages. But that is not right, Reverend Walker; that is not Christian.
Walker: It’s true, I do judge these natives by my European standards. But it is my European Christian faith. I don’t expect black natives to have my European standards of hygiene or table manners, but I don’t believe that the European Christ is just a European projection of God. I believe He is the one true God, so why shouldn’t I be disappointed, even appalled and disgusted, when I see that the natives here have nothing but contempt for the living God, who is, I believe, synonymous with the European Christ?
Drayton: I’m very disappointed that you feel this way. Frankly I see no future for you as a missionary, nor do I think you are fit to serve as a minister in the Anglican Church, or any other church for that matter.
Walker: I’ve already come to that conclusion myself.
[Ruth Drayton enters the room.]
Mrs. Drayton: I couldn’t help overhearing what you just said, Reverend Walker. Surely things can’t be that glum; we need you here. Don’t we, Samuel?
Drayton [slightly embarrassed]: I’m afraid Reverend Walker is too disenchanted with me and with Kenya to stay here, Ruth.
Mrs. Drayton: Are things really that bad? [looking at Arthur]
Walker: I’m afraid they are, Mrs. Drayton, but I shall always be grateful to you for your kindness.
[exits]
Mrs. Drayton: I don’t pry into your work, dear…
Drayton: Nothing you do is prying, Ruth. We have shared my work here all these years.
Mrs. Drayton: Then I’m entitled to know why he is leaving.
Drayton: He doesn’t believe in the vision, Ruth. He doesn’t believe that God is love, he believes in an older, antiquated, parochial God. Why, he even questioned the humanity of the blacks under our care.
Mrs. Drayton: I once believed in that old God, and I think you might have, too, at least when you were a child. Is it so terrible to believe in such a God?
Drayton: What we forgive in a child, we cannot forgive in an adult. No true man of the cloth can serve a universal God of love and serve the old Christian God that was a creation of the sick fantasies of white Europeans.
Mrs. Drayton: I suppose you’re right, dear, but I must admit that old God was a comfort to me.
Drayton: But surely love is greater than hate. The God above all anthropomorphic concepts of God is pure love.
Mrs. Drayton: But who and what is that God?
Drayton: Surely you don’t expect an answer to that question. We can’t ever know God in his or her entirety. We can only love. And I love my people here in Kenya, my black brothers. I won’t have a minister serving under me who doesn’t share that love.
Mrs. Drayton: I suppose he had to go, but I’ll miss him.
Drayton: We’ll make out without him, we have our people.
Mrs. Drayton: For how long do you think we’ll have them, Samuel? I think we’re losing them all to the Mau Maus. So many missions have closed down, the ministers and priests massacred, and the people have gone back to the witch doctors.
Drayton: I don’t think that will happen here, Ruth. I can’t speak for the other missions, but here we have worked with the people. We’ve become one with them. They won’t harm us. Mau Mau only is effective when there has been no love between the whites and the black. We have loved them, Ruth; we have no reason to fear.
Mrs. Drayton: I wish I had your faith, Samuel. I am a little afraid.
Drayton: Don’t be; we’ll live to see one blessed, united, black Africa, united in the love that white Europeans never knew.
_____________
Act I. Scene 2. A bar in Nairobi.
[It’s late. Arthur Walker is one of two patrons left at the bar; there is one young couple left at one of the tables.]
Walker: One more beer, please.
Bartender [placing the beer in front of him]: There you go; that’s one of the things I’ll miss.
Walker: I don’t follow you.
Bartender: I’ll miss setting these beers down in front of some customer and watching the foam settle down in the glass.
Walker: You won’t be working here anymore?
Bartender: I guess you’ve never been in here before?
Walker: No, I haven’t. In fact I’ve never been in Nairobi before. I’ve been kind of out in the bush for the last 14 months.
Bartender: Farming?
Walker: Something like that.
Bartender: I didn’t mean to pry.
Walker: You’re not prying, it’s just not a very interesting story.
Bartender: You’re different from most customers.
Walker: How so?
Bartender: Most of my customers think whatever concerns them is real interesting to everybody else. But I don’t mind that. The more they blab, the bigger their bar tab. [he grins]
Walker: So you’re one of those archetypal bartenders, a kind of father-confessor and best friend all rolled into one.
Bartender: I wouldn’t go that far, but I listen to my customers. They’re buying my liquor, so why shouldn’t I let them talk?
Walker: No reason in the world why you shouldn’t, and God bless you for it. You’re an unsung hero. But tell me, why, if you like the work here, are you quitting?
Bartender: I’m quitting because I own this bar and I just sold it to some idiot who thinks he can still keep it going after the niggers come in.
Walker: You mean the transition from white government to black government?
Bartender: It won’t be anything like a government. It will be a massacre. You can’t let niggers have free rein – they’ll kill the whites and each other. It’s already happening on the white farms and out in the country. The Mau Maus are killing and looting, but once what the Macleods call ‘Independence’ and what every white man that isn’t in the government knows is just plain slaughter starts up, there won’t be any white businesses, because the whites that used to run them will be dead.
Walker: Where will you go?
Bartender: I made out all right here the last fifteen years. I got enough saved to go halves with a cousin in London. We’re going to open up a pub there.
Walker: Do you have a family?
Bartender: Yes, I have a wife and three children. I don’t fancy seeing them cut open by Macleod’s niggers. One week from today and we’ll be in London.
Walker: That sounds like a wise course. Your family should be your first concern.
Bartender: That’s more personal details than I’ve ever told any customer in the last fifteen years. I got an idea you’re some kind of preacher or something, maybe a missionary come in from the bush country. Am I right?
Walker: You’re right, but I’m no longer a missionary or a preacher.
Bartender: Things went sour?
Walker: I guess they did. But I didn’t sour on my faith, I just went sour on my ability to transmit that faith to the negroes.
Bartender: They’re not like white men, you can’t get anywhere with them unless you treat them different.
Walker: I should have stopped in here before I went to my assignment. You could have saved me a lot of trouble.
Bartender [laughing]: I don’t think you would have listened to me then.
Walker: No, I don’t suppose I would have; some things a man has to find out for himself. But tell me, when you say you can’t treat them as you would treat a white man, what do you mean?
Bartender: It’s not something that I can just spell out. But it’s there. I guess it comes down to this: I’ve owned this pub here for fifteen years. It’s not a fancy, posh pub, but it’s not a low dive either. I get some well-off whites and some low-class whites, and I get some scum-of-the-earth whites. But the low-life, criminal-type whites are still not as bad as the niggers. The niggers don’t seem to have… I can’t think of a word for it, but it’s like when a man’s done something that’s good, we say, “That’s mighty white of you.” They just don’t have it; they can’t be mighty white.
Walker: They have not charity?
Bartender: I guess that’s it.
Walker: In my work…
[At this moment, three blacks walk into the pub and take seats next to the young white couple. When the white man and woman get up to leave, one of the negroes stands in their way.]
Bartender: Excuse me, I have something to take care of.
First negro [to the white man and woman]: Why did you get up to leave?
White man: It was time to go.
First negro: Come sit with us. We’ll buy you and your girlfriend a drink.
White man: She isn’t my girlfriend, she’s my wife. I appreciate your offer, but we really must go.
Second negro [getting up from the table]: I don’t think you understand – we’ll be offended if you don’t drink with us.
Third negro [getting up and grabbing the white woman]: Why don’t you go and leave your wife behind.
White man: Take your hands off her or I’ll…
Bartender [wielding a meat cleaver]: That will be enough. You three get out – independence hasn’t arrived yet. Come back in three weeks. Till then this is my place, and I don’t serve blacks. Now get out.
[Walker comes up behind the bartender with his right hand in his pocket. The blacks take note of that and the meat cleaver.]
First negro: We’ll be back in a couple of weeks.
Bartender: You do that. And then we’ll all have a few beers together and talk about the good days to come.
[The three negroes exit.]
Bartender [to the white couple]: Did you drive here yourselves or take a cab?
White man: We took our car.
Bartender: Let me walk you to your car.
White man: I understand. I appreciate your consideration. If I was armed, it would be a different story, but I’m not, so I’d appreciate your company.
Walker: I’ll go along.
Bartender: Here, take this. [hands Walker a revolver] That will be better than your pipe.
Walker: How did you know it was only a pipe?
Bartender: I saw you slip it into your pocket. But it worked fine, they didn’t know whether you were going to shoot them or not. Well, let’s go.
[The bartender and Walker return to the bar after the escort.]
Bartender: That’s the type of nonsense I’ll be through with, in a few days.
Walker: Won’t you still have to serve negroes in England?
Bartender: Yes, but there won’t be so many of ‘em. And by the time there are too many, I hope to be out of the business altogether.
Walker: If you can’t stand to be near negroes, and they hate white people, why are Macleod and his ilk trying to make you live together?
Bartender: That’s the question alright. It’s insane, but Macleod is going to do it.
Walker: And it isn’t really such a mystery when I think of it. It’s people like me, the clergy men and the trained politicians, who think they’re smarter than everybody else, who want to mix the races.
Bartender: You’re right, Rev, and their smartness is going to cost plenty. It already has. But you’re not like them. Don’t go back there. I don’t know why they haven’t got ‘round to your mission’ yet, but they will.
Walker: That’s good advice, but I’ve got to go back one more time.
_________________________________________
“I stayed through the next two weeks and saw Joe Hopkins, the bartender, and his family off to London. At the airport, he slipped a .38 special revolver into my hand and said, ‘You’ll need this more than me, Rev. Take care of yourself – all hell is going to break loose here.’
“Did all hell break loose? Yes, it did. But not in the first 48 hours of the new era of black rule. At first there was silence in the streets. The blacks couldn’t quite believe that the white man was really going to turn the government over to them. It had to be some trick, because if they were in the white man’s place, they would not hand their power over to the white man. But when it became apparent that the whites were serious about their suicidal decision to hand Kenya over to the blacks, the hellish nightmare began. The white business owners who had actually believed that there would be business as usual under the new black regime were quickly divested of their illusions. The lucky ones just had their businesses burned down while escaping with their lives. But most white business owners were not that lucky. They saw their wives and children humiliated, raped, and murdered before their eyes while they in turn were humiliated, raped, and murdered. Thousands upon thousands of white men, women, and children remain unaccounted for up to this day after the horrible black independence “celebration.” Surely the white men with black hearts who worked so long and hard to bring “independence” to Kenya deserve a special place in hell.
“There was one man, a retired English officer who stood head and shoulders above the rest of us. While the official army stood by and often aided the looters and rapists in their satanic actions, one Major Lawson, armed only with a swagger stick, saved over 250 whites from torture and death. He was badly beaten, but he emerged safe and sound after his incredible rescue missions into the jaws of hell. My one rescue effort paled in comparison to Major Lawson’s efforts, but I was glad to have saved one family from the black hell. It happened like this – I was making my way out of town, because I saw that there would be no relief coming and whites were going to be massacred. A man could either stay and behave like Major Lawson, or he could leave. Lacking Major Lawson’s courage, I decided to leave, if I could.
“I commandeered an abandoned car – you can substitute ‘stole’ for ‘commandeered’ if you like – and tried to get out of the city. On the outskirts of town, right before the highway turns into a narrow lane to the bush country, I saw a half dozen blacks in a circle around what appeared to be a white family – father, mother, and three young children. The man had a long, heavy stick and was trying to fend off the six Mau Maus (all blacks are Mau Maus, even if they aren’t official members of the cult). It was obvious the father was doomed to die along with his family, who were cowering in fear behind the father. It helped that I had seen action in the army, albeit I had not seen anything so horrific in the war. At any rate I pulled up the car, got out, and opened fire on the Mau Maus. I dropped five with six bullets while the sixth one tried to lop off my head with a machete. He missed with his first try and before he got a second try the father cleaved his skull in two with his stick. I reloaded my revolver and got the whole family into the car. With no particular plan I headed for the bush country.
“I knew that where I was headed to with my charges was only marginally safer than the place I was leaving. Mau Mau activity in the smaller towns and the jungle outposts had been going on for the past ten years. The cities had still been under some control until the switch from white to black rule was finalized in 1960. So now the jungle was safer, because the concentrations of blacks were less out there than in the city. But still, I knew we were in great danger. I had managed to kill five of those six Mau Maus because I took them by surprise, but out in the jungle they could take me by surprise. And that is what happened. We had to leave the car once the jungle got too thick around us. It was then that I walked into a Mau Mau trap, and in a split second I was hanging by my ankles 10 feet off the ground. When they cut me down, I didn’t manage to completely protect my head, so I lost consciousness when I hit the ground. The last thing I heard was the screams of the mother and her children.
“When I regained consciousness I did not see what I had expected to see: the tortured and mutilated bodies of my white friends. Instead I saw Ezekiel standing over me. Obviously I didn’t know Ezekiel as you and Edward Owens know him, but I had heard of him. You couldn’t live in Kenya in the 1950s and into the 1960s without hearing about Ezekiel, the Christian avenger, the devil, or the lunatic, depending on who you were talking to. In my case, and the case of the white family with me, he was an avenging angel of mercy. There were 14 dead Mau Maus strewn along that jungle trail, and they had all been killed by Ezekiel. He offered to take me and my temporary white family, by way of battlefield adoption, to a small private airport and see that we were flown to safety. The Crandalls accepted his offer, but I declined. When he pressed me for the reason why I declined, I told him it was because of the Draytons. I felt it was morally incumbent on me to see if the Mau Maus had decided to finally finish them now that independence, or what could more accurately be called the era of white genocide, was official.
“Ezekiel understood my dilemma, so he made a counter proposal. He suggested I go with him to see the Crandalls safely off and then we would both go see if the Draytons were still alive. I agreed, so after we watched them take off, we started toward the Draytons’ mission. Ezekiel was not exactly what I would describe as a scintillating conversationalist, but after about five miles into our walk, I think I hit on his type of topic.”
_____________________________
Act II. Scene 1.
Walker: There is something I don’t understand about this massacre of the whites.
Ezekiel: And what’s that?
Walker: Why were the whites so passive? Why didn’t they fight back? I’m not particularly heroic, but I did manage to fight off that first attack on the Crandalls.
Ezekiel: It’s been like this for the last 10 years. The whites are never prepared to fight back, because the white governments deluge them with propaganda about the good and noble black savage. The whites that didn’t believe that satanic garbage left Kenya before the day of blood.
Walker: That’s basically what Mr. Crandall said. He told me that he believed in the new black and white era of cooperation right up until the reign of black terror began.
Ezekiel: And who saved him from his own folly?
Walker: I did.
Ezekiel: And why were you able to save him and his family?
Walker: Because a white man named Joe Hopkins who did not believe in the noble black savage gave me a .38 special and told me to be ready.
Ezekiel: And you were ready, because what you saw when you worked with the black savages in that jungle mission showed you what the black really is.
Walker: That’s true. But the Draytons have worked with the blacks for over twenty years, and they never saw what I saw in just 14 months.
Ezekiel: There are none so blind as those who will not see. I was like the Draytons once, and I lost my family because of it.
Walker: If we find the Draytons alive, do you think they’ll come out of the jungle with me?
Ezekiel: No.
Walker: I guess what I’m doing is futile then?
Ezekiel: No, nothing done in His name is futile. We’re about two miles from their mission; let’s circle around to the west and enter the compound from that end.
________________
Act II. Scene 2.
[Ezekiel and Arthur are walking through the ruins of a burned-out missionary compound. They find the tortured and mutilated bodies of Mr. and Mrs. Drayton, two black female house servants, and two young black boys.]
Walker [on his knees before Mrs. Drayton’s mutilated body]: Dear God, why?
Ezekiel [placing his hand on Walker’s shoulder]: Stand up; we must bury them quickly and leave.
Walker: The Mau Maus?
Ezekiel: Yes, they might be back. I always keep moving.
________________
Act II. Scene 3.
[In Ezekiel’s cave]
Walker: How long have you lived here?
Ezekiel: About 8 years.
Walker: I’ve heard about you. They say you’re completely mad.
Ezekiel [pointing to the skeletons of his family]: Because of that?
Walker: Yes, and because of your hatred of the Mau Mau.
Ezekiel: You’ve been here 14 months; you’ve seen the Mau Maus; what do you think?
Walker: I think you’re saner than the rest of us.
Ezekiel [with just a touch of a smile]: That is a diplomatic answer. You’re welcome to stay here tonight or longer, but I don’t imagine you want to spend all of your life in this cave.
Walker: No, I don’t. But to tell you the truth I don’t know what to do or where to go. I came here as a missionary, but now…
Ezekiel: Do you still believe in the God you came here to serve?
Walker: Yes, but I’m no longer sure how to serve Him.
Ezekiel: Serve your people and fight the devil’s people; that is the way to serve Him.
Walker: I should just stay here in Kenya and kill Mau Maus?
Ezekiel: No, not everyone is called to do what I’m doing. But this black Jacobinism – the Rev. Christopher Grey taught me that term – is a worldwide phenomenon. Pick your spot on the globe and then fight black Jacobinism.
Walker: You know the Rev. Grey?
Ezekiel: I knew of him when he was here for two years, from ’53 – ’55, but I never met him personally. Then, in 1958, a friend of mine, Edward Owen, convinced the Reverend to come and see me. That’s when I met him in the flesh. He is a remarkable man; a man of faith.
Walker: I never knew him personally, but it was his sermons that inspired me to become a minister.
Ezekiel: Well, he wouldn’t be disappointed in you now. He never did place much importance on official churches. Christ and His people are the Reverend Grey’s concerns.
Walker: What do you think he would advise me to do?
Ezekiel: I don’t know. I think you should ask him. Stay with me another week. That will give the bloodletting time to abate a bit; the Mau Maus, like all beasts of the jungle, have to rest after they feast on the blood of their prey.
Walker: That’s a rather grisly thought.
Ezekiel: Yes, it is, but it’s true. You asked God ‘why?’ when you were kneeling before Mrs. Drayton’s corpse. I didn’t have anything of comfort to say to you. I don’t know why. But I know His promise. The dead shall be raised. That’s all we know. Stay with that – the dead shall be raised. Until that time, there is Christ and His people, and there is the Mau Mau. So stay here this week, and then go see the Reverend Grey. I’ll send out a letter in advance, to let him know you’re coming. And take his advice. He hates to be treated as some kind of Christian sage, but he has the hand of God on Him; he’ll be able to direct you.
Walker: I can’t argue with that advice.
Ezekiel: Good; when the time comes then, I’ll make sure you get out of Kenya safely.
_________________________________________
“As it turned out Ezekiel had to wait 6 weeks before the bloodletting eased up. Finally the new black government had to restore some semblance of order, because their government was in danger of falling before it ever got started. But thousands upon thousands of whites were humiliated, tortured, raped, and murdered during that reign of terror, which only subsided during ‘normalcy’; it did not stop.
“I lived the life of a white African counterrevolutionary in those 6 weeks I spent with Ezekiel. It was more than bearable, it was enjoyable, but I knew that I found it enjoyable because I knew that it was not permanent.
“Ezekiel had to be at least twenty-five years older than me, but for the first couple of weeks I simply couldn’t keep up with him. He covered twenty to thirty miles a day, up and down rocky hills, through dense jungle; Ezekiel was always on the move. He collected information from native informants and from his own observations of the Mau Maus. During my stay with Ezekiel there were four encounters with Mau Maus, two in my third week, one in my fourth week, and one in my fifth. All four encounters were preemptive strikes, based on Ezekiel’s scouting missions. He found out about planned Mau Mau attacks, and he got there before them and killed them. I don’t think he needed my help, but I was proud to help. It was sad to think that Ezekiel and I, for a brief time, were the only white men fighting back against the satanic black barbarians sponsored by a Marxist-liberal government in Great Britain.
“It was to that Marxist-liberal country that I planned to return, because it was my country; where else could I go? Ezekiel got me passage on a ship to America, where I was then going to get a flight back to England, but a chance encounter with an American passenger altered my plans.”
___________________________________
Act III. Scene 1. Shipboard.
Walker: I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to disturb you. I thought no one else was above board.
Miller: I don’t own the ship. You’re entitled to stand there.
Walker [laughing]: But I know the feeling; you came up here to be alone.
Miller: Well, now I’m not. [getting up from the deck chair and coming to the railing next to Walker] My name is James Miller.
Walker: My name is Arthur Walker.
Miller: Miller and Walker, it sounds as if we’re both criminals on the run. No two men meeting by chance could be called Walker and Miller, it just doesn’t happen.
Walker [laughing]: Well, I am Arthur Walker.
Miller: And I’m James Miller, so where do we go from here?
Walker: Are you an American?
Miller: Kind of.
Walker: I’m not sure I follow you. What kind of an American are you?
Miller: I’m a Southerner.
Walker: Then you are an American.
Miller: Yes, I was just misbehaving. We’ve all made up after that little tiff in the 1860s. [stifling a yawn]
Walker: You mistake me if you think I want to meet a nice reconstructed Southerner. I’d love to meet an unreconstructed Southerner.
Miller: And why is that?
Walker: Because I’ve just spent 16 months in Kenya.
Miller: What a coincidence, I’ve just spent 3 months in the Congo, just a little south and west of Kenya. But why should spending 16 months in Kenya make you want to talk with an unreconstructed Southerner?
Walker: Because if you are unreconstructed then I might actually find someone to talk to about the sons of Ham.
Miller: I take it you’re not overly fond of them?
Walker: No, I’m not.
Miller: Did you lose somebody close?
Walker: No, but I saw their bloodletting close-up. I was an Anglican missionary for 14 months in Kenya. I saw what was left of my superior and his wife.
Miller: I’m sorry.
Walker: I don’t want to fly under false colors. My superior sent in recall papers on me, a little before he was murdered.
Miller: Why?
Walker: Because we quarreled over the blacks. I didn’t think they were capable of being converted, and he thought they already had been converted.
Miller: That’s quite a discrepancy in viewpoints.
Walker: Yes, and since he was my superior, I had to go. He wrote to his superiors in London and recommended that I be… how did he put it? I think he said I should be terminated.
Miller: Killed?
Walker [laughing]: No, he just meant that I shouldn’t be a minister in the Anglican Church any more. He could have just recommended that I be given another post that wasn’t in Africa, but he went the whole nine yards and recommended my dismissal.
Miller: Did that bother you?
Walker: Yes, but not in the way you might think. It didn’t bother me that I could be dismissed. I had already decided to resign. But it did bother me that an Anglican clergyman thought that the acceptance of the liberal line on the sacred negro was the main criteria of a man’s fitness to be a clergyman. Rev. Drayton made it clear to me that he didn’t believe in Christ crucified, Christ risen, so it was particularly disappointing to me to see that his faith in the negro was more important to Canterbury than my faith in Christ.
Miller: How do you know that Canterbury agreed with Drayton?
Walker: Because Canterbury defrocked me before I could resign.
Miller: That is a pretty good sign that you’re not wanted. I think all of the churches should have big signs out front: ‘Men of faith are not welcome here.’
Walker: I wonder if all the churches are as bad as mine. I was raised in an independent, fundamentalist church; maybe I should have stuck with that church?
Miller: I only have intimate knowledge of one church, but it seems to me that they are all, to some degree, tainted with what Dr. Verwoerd calls the negrophile psychosis. They have either replaced Christ with the negro, or else they have made Him a subordinate deity to the negro.
Walker: Funny that I should meet you here and we should end up talking about the white man’s worship of the negroes.
Miller: It’s not that funny at all. We’re both traveling from Africa, which should be called black hell.
Walker: Would I be prying if I asked you why you were traveling in Africa?
Miller: No, because if I didn’t like you I’d feel free to tell you to mind your own business. But since I like pastors who don’t worship negroes, I will tell you. I was a police officer in Savannah, Georgia from age twenty-two until age thirty-four; I was a patrolman for nine years and a detective for three years. In my twelfth year a dark cloud descended over the detective bureau, and I left under it. One of the elder statesmen on the force, the captain of the detectives, my superior, was found guilty of taking bribes. I was not convicted of wrongdoing, but in order to avoid even “the appearance of corruption” I was asked to resign. At first I refused, but when they promised to find something to convict me of if I didn’t resign, I resigned.
Walker: But if you weren’t guilty of…
Miller: Every cop that actually tries to lock up bad guys is guilty of something. You’d never be able to make an arrest if you followed all their rules.
Walker: What happened to your captain; did they send him to prison?
Miller: He was sentenced to 10 years, but he never served a day.
Walker: Probation?
Miller: You’ve got to be kidding. They wanted to show how pure they were. He shot himself before he started his jail sentence.
Walker: I’m sorry to hear that.
Miller: So was I.
Walker: I don’t want to sound unduly judgmental, but was he guilty?
Miller: Not in the way they said he was guilty.
Walker: I don’t quite understand.
Miller: Paul went right from a combat unit in the war to the police force. For him police work was just a continuation of the war, only now it was even more local. He never took bribes to get some drug lord off the hook, and he never turned his back on a crime. But he’d do favors for his friends. It was usually for his friends’ children. He’d see that their names were kept out of the papers, and sometimes he’d make sure they didn’t get charged at all. He didn’t do it for money, he did it out of friendship. But he didn’t turn the money down if Christmas time came around and extra money came to him from his friends. When a new administration moved in with a pledge to get rid of the rough stuff, Paul was old school – black jack and no warning shots. Paul was fed to the wolves. He was corrupt, they said, because he took bribes. It was the saddest day of my life when he was sentenced, and then he shot himself, and things got a lot sadder.
Walker: What did you do when you resigned from the force?
Miller: I became a licensed private detective.
[Walker laughs.]
Miller [smiling]: Why do you laugh?
Walker: I grew up reading detective novels. And it’s funny – maybe you could explain this – in the American detective novels the police are either ineffectual or corrupt, and it is a private detective such as Philip Marlowe or Sam Spade who solves the case. In Britain, it is usually the Scotland Yard detective who solves the crime. Bulldog Drummond and Sherlock Holmes are exceptions, but even in those novels the police might be ineffectual, but they are not corrupt.
Miller: What you say is true, but I’m not sure why that is. I guess Americans like to pride themselves on being anti-authoritarian. It’s all nonsense, but that’s the way Americans like to think of themselves: they like to think they are rugged individualists.
Walker: You don’t buy that?
Miller: No, I don’t. Americans are the biggest sheep in the world. Everybody, now that they lost the war, likes to get on the Germans for kowtowing to Hitler, but didn’t we kowtow to that commie bastard Roosevelt? And aren’t we kowtowing now to the commies and their shock troops, the negroes?
Walker: I don’t think it would be appropriate for an Englishman to comment on America’s decadence; we haven’t exactly shone as beacons of Christian civilization in the postwar era.
Miller: No, I don’t suppose you have. It seems like all the white nations are going through a reconstruction period.
Walker: And who’s doing the reconstructing?
Miller: White liberals or communists – whatever you call them, it amounts to the same thing.
Walker: And the negroes are the shock troops?
Miller: Yes, that’s right.
Walker: After what I’ve seen in Kenya, I can’t quarrel with your assessment. But what was a private detective from Savannah, Georgia doing in Kenya?
Miller: I was working for a client. I’ve been a private detective for the past twelve years – if you’re counting, that makes me 46 – and this last case is only the second time I’ve had to leave the States to do what I was hired to do. But in the other case I didn’t have to travel across the ocean, I only had to go to Mexico. But this time it was to stinkin’, bloody Africa that I went.
Walker: Were you successful?
Miller: I found out what my client wanted me to find out, but it won’t be pleasant news that I’ll be bringing home.
Walker: How bad is it?
Miller: The worst kind. Maybe I should give you a little more background.
Walker: I’d like to hear it; it seems, out here on deck, that we’re the only two men left in the world.
Miller: I was sent by the Fitzpatrick family to find their twenty-two year old daughter. The Fitzpatricks were, and still are, I suppose, what you would call fervent Catholics. Their lives revolved around their parish church. Jeanne and Sean had only one child, named Colleen. They hired me to find her, because I was a member of their parish when I was growing up. I haven’t been inside a church in over twenty years, and I made that clear to them. But still, they had known me “back then,” and they didn’t know any other private investigators, so they called on me.
Colleen was the victim of her parents’ Catholicism. She was brought up to love and cherish negroes as God’s pure and simple children of nature. Her parish priest and the good sisters at the Catholic school she attended all taught her about the evils of segregation and the evil part her own people, the Southern whites, had played in denying black people their rights as citizens. So good, devout Colleen, upon her graduation from a “good Catholic college,” went to the Congo to “help” blacks. She was one of those “unfortunate victims” of African independence. She was working in northern Katanga at a time of the massacre. It didn’t matter that she was there to help the ‘pure and simple’ natives, the pure and simple natives tortured, raped, and murdered her.
I suspected right from the beginning that she was one of the thousands of victims of the Katanga massacre, but it took me some time to get documented proof that the mutilated body I thought was Colleen’s body was in fact her body. I’ve got that proof with me now, and I’d give all my worldly possessions if I could give her parents back their daughter. But that is up to your Boss, isn’t it?
Walker: Yes, it is. A new friend of mine, a man called Ezekiel, told me there is only His promise that the dead shall be raised, which sustains any of us.
Miller: But it takes a hell of a lot of faith to actually believe that.
Walker: You don’t?
Miller: I won’t say that. I’d like to believe it. And I guess, like Horatio, I do in part believe it. It’s funny, I most believe in Him when I look right in the face of Mau Maus. They are so evil, so obviously the servants of Satan, that I immediately project Satan’s opposite – Jesus Christ. It’s when I come within hearing distance of a Western clergymen, telling me about the goodness of our black brethren that I become a non-believer.
Walker: I’ve had that same experience. In my last talk with my superior he told me of his faith in the sacred negro and his lack of faith in Christ crucified, Christ risen. It took all my spiritual resolve to fight free of his horrific vision of God. If not for a chance meeting with Ezekiel, I might still be hovering in that in-between land, the land between faith and unbelief.
Miller: You mentioned that horrific vision of God. Isn’t that the key? How can people who profess to be Christian worship the people who commit horrific atrocities as a matter of course, as you or I might brush our teeth or plant a garden?
Walker: “Welcome the savage God,” is what our clergymen tell us. I won’t. If I die in the attempt, I intend to fight this negroization of the West with all my heart, mind, and soul – Are you laughing at me? I wouldn’t blame you if you are; I do sound a lot like King Lear in the storm, thundering impotently about my revenges.
Miller: I’m not laughing at you – at least you’re thundering against the right things. And who’s to say that your thundering will be ineffectual? But in between your thundering against the savage gods, what will you do for a living?
Walker: Quite frankly, I don’t know. I’m just grateful to get out of Africa with my life and with my faith intact. I have no thought of what I’ll do for a living now that I’m no longer an Anglican minister.
Miller: The first couple of years after I was forced to resign from the force were hard on me financially, but once I built up a reputation in the business I started doing all right. In fact, now I employ a number of operatives. I could use another.
Walker: That’s awfully kind of you, but I know nothing about private investigating.
Miller: You’ve read the Raymond Chandler books, haven’t you?
Walker: Yes.
Miller: And you’ve read the Bulldog Drummond books of McNeile?
Walker: Yes.
Miller: Well, there you have it, you’ll be a combination of Phillip Marlowe and Bulldog Drummond. I could use such a man.
Walker (laughing): If you’re serious, I accept your offer. But I could use a few weeks in London first. I need to see another outcast Anglican minister.
Miller: The Reverend Grey?
Walker: Yes, how did you know?
Miller: I’ve read a great deal of his books. A man like you, after what you’ve experienced, wouldn’t be looking for advice from anybody but that man. Sure, I can wait a few weeks. But then you come over the ocean, like Prince Charlie, and try your hand at Drummond and Marlowe.
________________
Act III. Scene 2. London
[Two weeks later. Rev. Grey’s living room – Francesco Bontini, Inspector John Chambers, Christopher Grey, and Arthur Walker are present.]
Chambers: That will be quite a change, from Anglican minister to an American private investigator.
Walker: I really think I’m simply a charity case of James Miller.
Rev. Grey: It’s not just that. Mr. Miller needs men who are excellent judges of character, and you are just that.
Walker: That is kind of you to say, but I misread the Draytons and I misread my vocation; I thought I had one, and didn’t.
Rev. Grey: Don’t go down that road. If you were wrong to pursue the collar, what does that say about me?
Walker: I didn’t intend any slight…
Rev. Grey: I know you didn’t. And you needn’t apologize; I’m not at all sensitive about the subject. I served God in the capacity I thought He wanted me to serve Him. Whether I was right or wrong, He’ll be the final judge.
Bontini: The Rev. Grey started before we did, Arthur. [looking over at Grey with a smile] He is an Ancient Mariner; he did not have to tell lies about God when he started out. When they wanted him to, he got out of that type of service. We both, you in the Anglican, and I in the Roman Catholic church, ran into the contradiction between God’s truth and our church’s ‘truth’ earlier in our careers.
Walker: And now we have no career in the church.
Bontini: I wouldn’t say that. The church consists of those who believe in Christ, not of those who belong to an organization that may or may not serve Christ.
Chambers: I go along with Father Bontini; church organizations don’t amount to a thing.
Bontini: You see Arthur, there’s confirmation from one of the last knights of Christendom; that should reassure you. He hasn’t been inside a church for over forty years and yet…
Chambers: Don’t give me a halo, Father. I came late to this Christian knight business.
Rev. Grey: But you did come and that is the point Francesco is making. You are one of the last knights of Europe.
Chambers: I believe we’ve gotten off track; I thought we were giving Arthur a going away party.
Rev. Grey: Yes, we are, but I thought we’d take a moment to praise…
Chambers: No need.
Bontini: The Rev. Grey always tells me I’m indispensable, but if you ever need some help in dealing with the negro worshippers within the Catholic church, Arthur, I can take the time to come over. I’ve had some experience in that regard.
Walker: Thank you. I don’t know what type of work I’ll be doing, but I’ll take you up on your offer if something like that comes up.
Rev. Grey: Inspector Chambers has seen a lot of the white slave rings, right here in England. It seems to be a world-wide thing, this extreme hatred of the white race.
Chambers: When I first heard the Rev. Grey use the term “negro worship” I thought he was exaggerating to make a point. But when I ran into Kimaru, I realized that the Rev. Grey was not exaggerating — the men who govern the nations of Europe literally worship the negroes. The negroes themselves have no idea why the whites are handing their women, their children, and their nations over to them, all they know is that the whites are weak, so they pounce on them, like jungle cats pounce on their prey.
____________________________
“As you no doubt remember, Rev. Grey, the party went on for quite some time, and I drank more ale than I was used to. It meant the world to me to have friends of the heart. I went to America, not feeling that all was right with the world, but feeling that all was right in my world so long as I was right with the same God that Christopher Grey, Francesco Bontini, James Miller, and John Chambers worshipped.”
___________________________________
Act IV. Scene 1.
[Miller is in the den of the home of Sean Fitzpatrick, father of Colleen Fitzpatrick, the girl who was murdered in the Katanga massacre. There is a knock on the outside door of the den.]
Fitzpatrick: Come in.
Miller: Arthur, this is Mr. Sean Fitzpatrick. I’ve told you a bit about his family.
Walker: Yes, you have. My deepest sympathies, Mr. Fitzpatrick.
Fitzpatrick: That is most kind of you, I thank you. It’s not necessary to call me ‘mister;’ Sean will do.
Miller: I know this must seem very mysterious to you, Arthur. Asking you to meet here, instead of at the office. But I have a very good reason for this clandestine meeting. I haven’t let you near the office since you came over, because I didn’t want you to be seen with me or anyone connected with my business.
Fitzpatrick: If you don’t mind, James, I’d like to go lie down. You don’t need me for anything at present, do you?
Miller: No. I just wanted you to meet the man we’ll be working with.
Fitzpatrick: He seems to be a good man. It was nice meeting you, Mr. Walker.
Walker: Likewise.
[Fitzpatrick exits the room, and Walker gives Miller a look that asks, ‘What is going on here?’]
Miller: I can see you’re a little confused, Arthur, but there has been method to my madness.
Walker: No need to apologize. If you want to pay me to sit in my apartment reading books on your local history, that is up to you.
Miller: Did you read those sections on the Southern Bureau Against Racial Injustice, SBARI?
Walker: Yes.
Miller: What did you make of the organization?
Walker: It seems like your typical Marxist front organization. A few devout communist Jews at the head of the organization and the usual array of liberal clergymen and liberal academics lined up with the communists. All of them fighting racial injustice, as they put it, but in reality using negro shock troops to destroy what is left of white civilization.
Miller: You’ve summed it up quite well.
Walker: Thank you for the compliment on my reading ability, but what does this have to do with your private investigating agency?
Miller: We’ve been hired to destroy that agency.
Walker: Am I allowed to ask who hired us to destroy that agency?
Miller: I don’t generally give out the name of our employers. But in this case, I’m going to make an exception, because I think it will help you work on the case. In fact, I don’t think you could proceed without some more information.
Our employer is Sean Fitzpatrick, the man you just met. He is not in very good shape physically right now; he has been found, more than once, sleeping out by his daughter’s grave, but he is sound up here [pointing to his head] and sound in there [pointing to his heart]. In fact, he is a lot saner spiritually than he has been in his entire life.
Walker: I imagine he has some compelling reason, connected to his daughter’s death, that makes him want to see the SBARI destroyed.
Miller: Yes, he does. As I told you on the boat, Fitzpatrick was a ‘support your local clergy’ Catholic. Whatever his local priest, in conjunction with his local bishop, said was law to Fitzpatrick. Well, it was his local priest and his local bishop that served on the board of SBARI. They worked in unison with the Jewish Marxists and several Protestant clergymen to promote what they called civil rights. It all sounded so noble, but the negroes were not converted to Christ, they simply had free rein to be themselves. And being themselves meant they could kill whites with impunity. The SBARI pays for the defense of every black that murders a white.
And the SBARI’s benevolent work also extended to Africa. They supported the Mau Mau reign of terror and encouraged young Catholics, such as Colleen Fitzpatrick to go there to “help” the struggling Africans to get out from under the white man’s yoke. Colleen took it all the way. She went to Africa to “help” the good, noble black savages, and she paid the ultimate price. Fitzpatrick knows he can’t kill every last liberal and every black barbarian on the face of the earth, but he wants to do something. He won’t be pacified with the “mustn’t be violent” rhetoric; he wants to hit the SBARI hard, and he wants to sponsor vigilante hits on black barbarians who kill whites and then get off because SBARI lawyers get them off.
Walker: It’s a tall order.
Miller: Sean doesn’t expect miracles – he knows that this is just the start of a white counterrevolution – but he wants it to begin right here in Savannah, Georgia.
Walker: Does he still consider himself a Catholic, or has he gone atheist?
Miller: He considers himself a Christian, but he swears he’ll never set foot in a church again so long as he lives. “I made a whited sepulcher of my parish church, and it cost my daughter her life,” was the way he put it.
Walker: Most of us have done something similar along the way. It’s easy to mistake the furniture of the church for the real church.
Miller: Well, let’s get down to your part in this drama – I’ve kept you away from the main office, because I want you to join the SBARI.
Walker: But won’t they check my background?
Miller: I’m counting on it.
Walker: But they’ll find out that I was dismissed for “conduct detrimental to good racial relations.”
Miller: They’ll find out you were dismissed for “conduct detrimental to race relations,” but I doubt that they’ll figure out that you were dismissed for the wrong attitude. They’ll assume, because you were younger than the missionary you worked with, that you were the liberal one who wouldn’t listen to your superior’s racist view of negroes. That is my guess. If you give them a big dose of sincere liberal garbage when they interview you, that will clinch it.
Walker: I’ll give it a try. But if it works, if I do get a job there, what is my next step?
Miller: Just keep in touch. Let us know what’s going on with some of the big shots. Then we’ll see what we can do to damage their organization. That’s what we’re being paid for.
Walker: How much time have we got? I don’t think Fitzpatrick wants to keep paying indefinitely.
Miller: Sean is rich. There is no money limit. You just be careful, don’t get impatient and overplay your hand, and I’m sure you’ll come up with something.
______________________
Six weeks later – Walker’s report to Miller:
“I didn’t send you anything until now, because I didn’t think I had anything worth reporting. That’s why you just received those short “nothing to report” notes. But now I have something that might be of interest. First, let me run down some of the major players and the foot soldiers in this organization. The man who interviewed me when I first came here, Aaron Siegel, seems to be the second in command. He is in his mid-fifties, quite thin, you might even say emaciated. He lives for the cause, eschewing alcohol, smoking, and women. What about men? No, he appears to be asexual. He is a true believer, a Marxist Jew who hopes to destroy the West through the negro. Trotsky would be proud of him.
“The high mucky muck, also a Marxist Jew, Jacob Belenky, is a different story. He is in his mid-forties, very jovial and very cultural. As such he is far more dangerous, in my opinion, than his unadulterated, emaciated second-in-command. He is totally committed to revolution through the negroes, but he is much more adept at hiding his revolutionary nature behind a very jovial and witty façade. I receive most of my orders from Siegel, but I have talked with Belenky on several occasions.
“Bishop Callahan cannot always attend the meetings, but he is very committed to the cause. Unlike Siegel and Belenky, who are completely secularized, Callahan still professes to believe in the Catholic faith, but he believes in it the way Rev. Drayton believed in the Anglican faith. He has blended Christ with the negro, which makes Christ something quite different from Christ the Lord.
“Then there is Father O’Reilly, Sean Fitzpatrick’s parish priest. He strikes me as the most zealous of the lot. He’s in his mid-thirties, completely without scruples or morals (he is a promiscuous homosexual), and he has no regard for anything that does not further the interests of the negro. For Siegel and Belenky, the negroes are a means to an end, for Callahan and O’Reilly (particularly O’Reilly), the worship of negroes is the desired end.
“The reason I’ve fit in here so well is because there are so many ex-clergymen and currently practicing clergymen who are members of the SBARI. It’s kind of an exclusive club. I’ve met and spent some time with a Methodist minister by the name of Julie Pierce, and with an ex-clergyman by the name of Thomas Truscott, formerly of the Presbyterian Church. They all have one thing in common; they are committed, heart and soul, to the negro. Whenever a negro murders, they take up his case, either claiming he is completely innocent, or, if his guilt is indisputable, claiming that he should be freed, because of the ‘legacy of slavery’ that made him do whatever crime he committed. Again, I get the impression with Siegel and Belenky that they use the “we must understand their rage” excuse as a calculated tactic, whereas the assorted Catholic and Protestant clergy and laymen truly believe that all black-on-white crime is justifiable under the blanket of the ‘legacy of slavery.’
“I haven’t spoken much with the clerical staff or the foot soldiers who put out the pamphlets and fill up the ranks of the protests and marches that the SBARI stage, because I thought it would look conspicuous for me to be hobnobbing with the hired help. Despite their professed love of the people, these people are very snobbish. The upper echelon keep to themselves. I’m kind of a low-ranking upper echelon, but I’m still upper echelon enough that I thought it best to stay in character by not getting too chummy with the foot soldiers.
“But now let me come to the heart of the issue. You remember you said that you and Fitzpatrick were particularly interested to learn if the SBARI confined itself to pamphleteering, the defense of black criminals after their crimes, and the libeling of all white opponents of SBARI? You wanted to find out if beside that they actually helped organize the murder of whites. Well, two nights ago I got some information that seems to suggest that the SBARI does actively engage in the murder of whites. You see I had dinner with Julie Pierce, and after four or five drinks she said more than she should have. She doesn’t know a lot of details – she isn’t that high up in the organization – but from one slip of speech, which I’m sure she didn’t remember in the morning, I became almost certain about the SBARI’s involvement in actual murders. When I’m absolutely sure of this, which will probably be in a few days, I’ll let you know via a letter, at the usual place.”
Second letter 3 days later:
“I need to meet with you; I’ve got the confirmation.”
________________
Act IV. Scene 2.
[In Fitzpatrick’s basement, Fitzpatrick, Miller, and Walker are present.]
Walker: I had to do a little second-story work to get the evidence I needed, but I got it.
Miller: Whose office did you have to rifle?
Walker: Father O’Reilly’s. It was Julie Pierce who inadvertently tipped me off. I read the documents I needed to read, and then I put them back and got out in the same way I came in.
Fitzpatrick: Shouldn’t you have kept the documents to try and convict Father O’Reilly?
Walker: Believe me, sir, they wouldn’t have stood up in court. They were written in code, a code I’ve come to recognize since I’ve been working there, but not something we could take to court. But this much is certain. O’Reilly and Callahan actually believe that Christ was only a prophet preparing the way for a black Christ that may be, or may not be, already present on the earth. But whether he has arrived or has yet to arrive, Callahan and O’Reilly think that all good Catholics must prepare the world for the coming of the Black Messiah by the extermination of the devil race. All whites who renounce their race and participate in the white blood bath will be spared. Siegel and Belenky don’t share Callahan’s and O’Reilly’s faith, but they use it. Besides defending black murderers they also permit O’Reilly and Callahan to suborn blacks to commit more murders of whites. They guarantee them “safe” killings, and they also give them ready cash. The murder of those two nuns outside the Cathedral a few weeks ago was not a random murder. Callahan and O’Reilly set it up. That mass murder of the 12 school children 3 months ago was not a random killing; it was set up by Callahan and O’Reilly.
Miller: Does this extend to other cities as well?
Walker: Definitely. Almost every city has a clergyman or two who accept the basic tenets of Callahan and O’Reilly’s black faith. And the ones that don’t believe as O’Reilly and Callahan believe still help their cause under the banner of civil rights. O’Reilly and Callahan don’t even want a lot of converts, they just want the clergy to look the other way when blacks murder and excuse the murders under the guise of “you must understand their rage,” or “the legacy of slavery.”
Miller: So O’Reilly and Callahan are operating an organization within an organization?
Walker: Yes. Siegel and Belenky allow them to go about their business using the SBARI headquarters because their business, the slaughter of whites, suits the needs of Siegel and Belenky as well. They feel the slaughter of whites will bring them closer to a Marxist state, and Callahan and O’Reilly think the slaughter of whites will bring about the arrival of the black Messiah.
Fitzpatrick: This is all fantastical…
Walker: I assure you, Mr. Fitzpatrick, that what I say is…
Fitzpatrick: I’m not questioning you, Mr. Walker; I have no doubt of the truth of what you’ve said. In a watered down way this is what the Catholic church, especially here in the south, has been preaching for many years. It’s fantastical, but unfortunately it’s true.
Miller: I believe it was Blake who said if mankind would not have the religion of Christ, they would have the religion of Satan. This would tend to confirm his words.
Fitzpatrick: Does this organization of Callahan and O’Reilly have branches abroad?
Walker: Yes, it does. And I should emphasize that Callahan and O’Reilly are only in charge of the Savannah chapter; they don’t run the whole show. Nor is it just a Catholic thing. There are clergymen, and women, from all denominations who are members. The American branch of the negro worshippers try to coordinate their big events with their European and African counterparts.
Fitzpatrick: What do you mean by ‘big events’?
Walker: The big mass slaughters, which are their equivalents of the old Catholic mass.
Fitzpatrick: Was the Katanga massacre, in which my daughter was murdered, one of those big events?
Walker: Yes, I’m sorry to say that it was. At the same date of the Katanga massacre there were fourteen whites killed in Lost Angeles and another dozen killed in Savannah. Those murders were directly connected to the Katanga massacre. I don’t know how many other murders of whites on that date were planned and how many were just the usual spontaneous murders that blacks commit as a matter of routine.
Miller: Do you know when the next big even is planned?
Walker: No, I don’t. I’m not that high up in the SBARI, nor am I a confidante of O’Reilly or Callahan. But I suspect another small scale murder is being planned. If I can get more information then maybe we can stop it.
Miller: We’ll try if you can manage to find out where and when. But be careful, be very careful; those men think no more of murdering a white man than they think of swatting a fly.
Walker: You’re wrong; they wouldn’t swat a fly, but they can and will kill a white man.
Miller: You’re right.
_________________
Act IV. Scene 3. London, Grey’s living room.
[Rev. Grey and Bontini are present.]
Rev. Grey: The letter goes on for another four pages, which I’ll come to later, but what do you think so far?
Bontini: It’s not surprising. It has always seemed to me that the modern black uprisings had much more white support than was apparent on the surface.
Rev. Grey: Yes, the Marxist-Jacobin influence has been with us for some time, but this incredible anti-white, anti-Christian push of organized Christianity is primarily a 20th century phenomenon. But you’ve been closer to it than I have, what do you think?
Bontini: It definitely exists now, that’s for sure. I’ll never forget that Kimaru mass of Pope John. But I think you’re right. The shift from Christ to the negro, except for isolated cases, has been largely a 20th century phenomenon. It’s connected in some way to the advance of science.
Rev. Grey: Precisely, the scientific view of the universe has turned the European toward the nature gods, and who is more natural, in the primitive sense, than the negro?
Bontini: But what about the rest of the letter; did they manage to stop any of the bloodletting?
Rev. Grey: Let’s see [he reads] —
“I was 90% sure I knew of a planned murderous attack at a coffee shop where a lot of white college students gathered together. A little before the shop’s 2:00 AM closing, five handpicked black murderers were going to kill as many whites as were in the shop and then scatter into the night.
“Miller and I were planning to intercept the blacks and kill them before they opened fire on the whites in the coffee shop. But in order to make sure they were the right blacks we were killing, we were going to have to wait until they drew their weapons. Then, we hoped, we’d have a split second to kill them before they started their killing spree.
“Fitzpatrick was there when we planned our strategy, but we never dreamed he’d want to take part in the action. But that is what he did. He refused to take no for an answer. He wanted to be one of the shooters. But Miller finally carried the day with his hard, truthful logic.
“’Look, I’ve had experience with this sort of thing. And Walker here has been trained by the best guerrilla fighter there is, that Ezekiel fellow. What we want to do is stop a murder spree. We don’t want to mess around with equal opportunity shooting. You’re paying for this, I know, but more than that, I know about this plan to murder the whites in the coffee shop, and I’ll stop it whether you pay me or not. Now you can pull me off the case if you want, but either way I’m going to stop this killing, and I’m going to stop it according to the plan I think has the best chance of success. If you get in the way, I’ll knock you unconscious and lock you up somewhere until it’s over.’
“Fitzpatrick smiled and shook both our hands. ‘I knew you were the men for me, but isn’t there something I can do?’
“There was; it was agreed that Fitzpatrick would drive, for want of a better word, the getaway car. As soon as we hit the potential murderers, he was to drive up and take us away from the coffee shop to a backwoods area where we were going to dump the car and the weapons and then proceed back to town in another car that we had hidden there.
“All went well. My information turned out to be pretty accurate. The only difference was that there were only four assailants, not five. The coffee shop activity was winding down, but the proprietor and six whites were in the shop at the time of the planned hit. About five yards from the shop the blacks took out their shotguns from under their coats. Before the leader got his hand on the door, Miller yelled ‘hands up’ and started firing with his pump action shotgun. I opened fire as well.
“It was over in about 15 seconds. We were not hurt, having taken them completely by surprise, and Fitzpatrick got us out of there quickly and efficiently, as if he had done similar getaways hundreds of times. It’s been four weeks since the preventive shooting and neither Miller, Fitzpatrick, nor I have been questioned by the police. The SBARI has organized the usual protest marches against ‘white racism.’ I marched, because I thought that a refusal to march would have destroyed my cover. But I think I’m already suspected, because a number of SBARI sponsored murder raids have gone awry since I started working for them. They are satanic, but not stupid. I’ll keep you informed, but I think my usefulness as an undercover man has come to an end.”
“Three weeks later…
“I was right. Three nights ago I was almost run over by a car, just like in that television show called The Untouchables. And last night two men came to kill me while I was in bed. But they found a dummy in the bed, not Arthur Walker, the dummy, but a stuffed, theatrical dummy. James Miller, my guardian angel, was behind the door. So there are two less stooges for the SBARI in the world. I’ll be returning to England next week. At that time I’d like to tell you the rest of my story.”
________________
Act IV. Scene 4. London, England. One week later.
[Chambers, Bontini, Grey, and Walker are in Grey’s living room.]
Rev. Grey: How is the girl’s father holding up?
Walker: Mr. Fitzpatrick is not doing well. He still spends a lot of nights by the grave site. I dare say he’s better than he’s been, now that he’s been able to hit the SBARI, but the touch of a vanished hand and the sound of a voice… You know what I mean.
Rev. Grey: Yes.
Bontini: And the battle with the SBARI is never over. It’s an ongoing battle. Even if that organization completely disappeared, some other would take its place.
Rev. Grey: That’s true. Once you see to the depths of this evil of negro worship, you yearn for some kind of apocalyptic showdown. But that is not up to us. Before that final battle, we are supposed to fight the thankless little battles, like you gentlemen have been fighting.
Bontini: Don’t include me in that “you gentlemen”; I’ve just been a spectator.
Rev. Grey: No, you haven’t. And I won’t permit you to say me nay on this. You have fought the good fight.
Chambers: The Reverend Grey is right, Father. The real war is not with material weapons.
Bontini: That is kind of you to say, Inspector Chambers, but I’m no longer Father Bontini.
Chambers: You are to me.
Bontini: Thank you again.
Walker: Fitzpatrick has the added problem of his wife. All she cares about is her husband’s mass attendance. He has stopped going to Mass, and he hates Father O’Reilly. That is more than his wife can take. They live in the same house, but they seldom speak any more.
Rev. Grey: That is very sad. Is there any hope of a reconciliation?
Walker: Not at the time I left Savannah. And if a reconciliation comes, it will only be because Mrs. Fitzpatrick has come over to Sean’s side of the fence. He is like steel on the issue of O’Reilly, Bishop Callahan, and the organized Catholic Church.
Bontini: I can understand that. But I hope he hasn’t become embittered against God.
Walker: I can’t say for certain how he feels about God. His grief for his daughter seems without end and without hope; that can’t be a good sign. And he seems to be looking for that great, apocalyptic confrontation with the negro-worshipping liberals.
Rev. Grey: Those two forces – grief and a desire for a final, definitive victory over your enemies, which can never come in this life, can lead a man to despair. But there is one thing that may help Mr. Fitzpatrick.
Walker: What is it?
Rev. Grey: Give him something close to the apocalyptic confrontation he wants. And make sure Mrs. Fitzpatrick is a witness. If she has a soul, it will turn her away from organized Roman Catholicism to a Christ-centered Catholicism.
Bontini: You must have something in mind, Christopher?
Rev. Grey: Nothing definite, but something Arthur said before you gentlemen came in gave me the germ of an idea.
Walker: I did?
Rev. Grey: Yes, you were telling me that the archdiocese of Savannah, in conjunction with all the archdioceses throughout the world, particularly in the European nations and Africa, were going to consecrate their churches to some negro patron saint.
Bontini: That’s true; I’ve heard something about that myself. Paul VI is going to declare over 100,000 new black saints to make sure there are enough to go around. One of the saints will be Kimaru.
Chambers [looking at Grey]: Fancy that; Kimaru a saint. Won’t that be nice?
Rev. Grey: No, it won’t be nice; it’s blasphemous, just as it was blasphemous for Pope John to concelebrate with him when he was alive. But that is just one of the multitudinous things that I have no control over.
Walker: The Anglican church and most of the Protestant denominations are all having some joint ceremonies with the Catholic church.
Chambers: Wouldn’t you like to have your hand on a dynamite lever that could blow all the negrophile celebrations in the various churches to kingdom come at one thrust?
Bontini: Without blowing up the people in the church?
Chambers: I suppose so.
Bontini: Then I’d be for it. But seriously, Christopher, what can we do about any of these negro consecrations; hasn’t the negrophile psychosis gone too far to be stopped by anything we can do?
Rev. Grey: No, we can’t stop it, but we can bear witness to a different God, our Lord Jesus Christ.
________________________________________________
Act V. Scene 1. Four weeks later. Bishop Callahan’s office.
[Bishop Callahan and Father O’Reilly are seated in the office.]
Callahan: I thought that Englishman – what was his name?
O’Reilly: Arthur Walker.
Callahan: Yes, that was it. I thought he was the traitor in our ranks who scuttled some of our punitive raids on the whites.
O’Reilly: He was, but I don’t think he acted alone. He had money behind him. I suspect that private detective was in on it.
Callahan: What private detective?
O’Reilly: His name is James Miller. He’s a former police detective, but for the past twelve years or so he’s run a private detective agency.
Callahan: I fail to see how a man who runs around peeping in key holes at the behest of unhappy married people has anything to do with us and our mission.
O’Reilly: If I’m right in my suspicions, he has everything to do with our mission. I think he was hired by someone to destroy, or, at the very least, damage the SBARI.
Callahan: Who is the person that hired him, presuming what you say is true about Miller?
O’Reilly: It’s true, and I think he’s working for Sean Fitzpatrick.
Callahan [laughing]: That’s nonsense! Fitzpatrick is the biggest donor to Catholic churches in the whole diocese, in the whole state, for that matter.
O’Reilly: Used to be, Bishop. He hasn’t given one red cent to any Catholic charity for the past eight months.
Callahan: Why?
O’Reilly: He had only one daughter, and she was killed in what they call the Katanga massacre. I’m sure it was not a massacre – that was false reporting – but in the heat of battle some blacks, with justice on their side, might have killed some of the white Red Cross workers. Or more probably some whites killed the Red Cross workers and blamed it on the blacks. At any rate, Fitzpatrick’s daughter was killed, and he blames the Catholic church in general and me especially for his daughter’s death.
Callahan: Why does he blame you especially?
O’Reilly: Because I was his parish priest, and I performed all those special negro masses and encouraged his daughter to attend a progressive Catholic university that taught the new progressive social teaching of the church, which stressed racial equality as the most pressing issue of the times.
Callahan: And he faults you for that? It seems to me he should be grateful to you for inspiring his daughter to give up her life in a worthy cause. It’s a pity she died so young, but surely he must know, as a Catholic, that martyrs go straight to heaven. His daughter died in the battle for racial equality; what greater Catholic cause can a young women die for?
O’Reilly: None greater, but Fitzpatrick has become a racist. He is against all things Catholic and he is very hostile to the SBARI.
Callahan: When did you first learn of Fitzpatrick?
O’Reilly: I’ve suspected him for quite some time, but my suspicions did not become virtual certainty until I had a visit from his wife last night. She came to talk to me about her husband, who is no longer attending Mass and has stopped every single church-related activity. She also told me that he often sleeps overnight at his daughter’s grave site. When I asked her, as discreetly as possible, if it was her daughter’s actual remains or just a memorial grave site, she told me it was her daughter’s actual remains. A private detective…
Callahan: James Miller?
O’Reilly: Precisely. He was hired to find out what happened to Colleen Fitzpatrick and bring her home. So he did bring her home, but not alive.
Callahan: I doubt that he even brought back the right body. We have only his word for it.
O’Reilly: No, I did some checking on that. It is the girl’s remains.
Callahan: Is it Mrs. Fitzpatrick that is waiting in the outer office?
O’Reilly: Yes. I told her you would see her.
Callahan: I don’t know what I can say to her that you haven’t said already. Is she the hysterical type?
O’Reilly: Emotional, I’d say, but not hysterical.
Callahan: Oh no.
O’Reilly: I’m sorry, but I thought your title and prestige might calm her down. And maybe you could learn more about what her husband is up to.
Callahan: You take liberties, Father, but go ahead, send her in.
O’Reilly: Should I stay or leave?
Callahan: I suppose you’d better leave us alone if we are going to do this right.
O’Reilly: All right. I’ll send her in.
[Mrs. Fitzpatrick enters and Bishop Callahan rises to give her a chair and then returns to behind his desk.]
Callahan: I’m so sorry about the recent death of your daughter, Mrs. Fitzpatrick, but it must be a great consolation to know that she died in a great Catholic cause.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: Yes, it is, Bishop. But I wish my husband could be consoled. I always thought we had a good marriage. We planned on a lot of children, but I had two miscarriages before Colleen was born, and after that I was unable to have any more children. But Sean so loved his little Colleen, it didn’t seem that important that she would be our only child. Now, there doesn’t seem anything left for him. He doesn’t go to Mass anymore and he often sleeps…
Callahan: Yes, Father O’Reilly mentioned that he often sleeps out at your daughter’s grave. But tell me is your husband angry at God or is he angry at the Roman Catholic Church?
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: Aren’t they one and the same?
Callahan: Yes, they are, but some people separate them in their mind’s eye.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: I would definitely say that his anger is directed at the Roman Catholic Church. And, I hate to say this – he particularly hates Father O’Reilly and you, Bishop.
Callahan: Don’t worry about offending me, Mrs. Fitzpatrick, I’m never personally offended when someone dislikes me because I wear the Roman collar. What concerns me is the danger to your husband’s soul. What he thinks of the man, Joseph Callahan, doesn’t matter, but when he hates me and Father O’Reilly in our official capacities as God’s anointed, well then, his soul is in danger, if he doesn’t repent, of eternal damnation.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick [breaking down in tears]: I know that, Bishop, but what am I do to?
Callahan: Can you tell me anything more about your husband’s malaise that would help me to help him? For instance, where does he go at nights when he isn’t at his daughter’s grave site, and whom does he meet?
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: I don’t know Bishop, he doesn’t confide in me since I defended you and Father O’Reilly.
Callahan: Defended us? Against what charges?
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: He says you no longer worship Christ; you worship the negro instead of Christ. And he feels that our daughter was so infected with that false negro worshipping religion that she went to Africa and was tortured and murdered.
Callahan: That is worse than nonsense; it is blasphemy.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: I know it is, Bishop. I didn’t want to tell you what he said, but…
Callahan: No, Mrs. Fitzpatrick, you are right to tell me everything that your husband has said against me. I represent the Church, how he feels about me is how he feels about God, and I must know what is going on in your husband’s soul if I’m going to help him.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: I don’t know what else I can say.
Callahan: This detective that he hired to bring your daughter back home; does he still see him?
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: I don’t know, Bishop, I have no idea who he sees. He certainly hasn’t brought him to the house after he brought Colleen home. [she starts to cry again]
Callahan: Please, Mrs. Fitzpatrick, don’t carry on so. I’m sure your husband will come around. I’ll have some masses said for his special benefit and for your daughter.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick: Bless you, Bishop. And I apologize for my husband. What else can I do? I still love him.
Callahan: Certainly, that’s as it should be. Now, let me give you my blessing. [she kneels] In the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, Amen.
[Mrs. Fitzpatrick exits and Father O’Reilly comes back in.]
O’Reilly: Well?
Callahan: The woman’s a wreck – I really couldn’t get any definitive information from her. But she did confirm what you said about her husband. He hates us. I think we should take what we know to Siegel and Belenky.
O’Reilly: How about the rest of the council?
Callahan: No, I think we should keep this matter between Siegel and Belenky and ourselves.
_____________
Act V. Scene 2. One week later. Offices of Siegel and Belenky.
Belenky: The mistake you made [addressing Father O’Reilly] was in assuming that Arthur Walker was defrocked for being too liberal. If you knew the state of the Anglican church today, you would not have assumed that was the case. The mistake has been costly.
Callahan: It’s not Father O’Reilly’s fault. He didn’t dream that someone would hate the SBARI enough to put a plant in our organization.
Siegel: Why shouldn’t he believe it? We plant our people in right wing organizations.
O’Reilly: I’m afraid I’m not as cold-blooded as you are, Siegel.
Belenky: This isn’t getting us anywhere. The point is that a mistake has been made. Walker and Miller ruined some of our raids. Now Walker is back in England, but Miller is still a menace, because he has Fitzpatrick’s backing.
Callahan: Are we sure that it is Fitzpatrick who is backing him?
Siegel: Yes.
Callahan: What can be done?
Belenky: There is only one thing that can be done.
O’Reilly: Kill him?
Belenky: Yes.
Callahan: Maybe if we just had Miller killed?
Belenky: Actually, Miller is not as important as Fitzpatrick. Once we eliminate Fitzpatrick, Miller won’t have the financial backing to continue.
Siegel: But Miller will have to be killed?
Belenky: Yes, but his death is not necessary as immediately as Fitzpatrick’s.
Siegel: Fitzpatrick’s wife must be killed as well.
Belenky: Of course.
Callahan: I really don’t see why she must be killed. How does her death promote racial equality?
Belenky: I must remind you, Bishop Callahan, that you joined this organization voluntarily; we did not recruit you.
Callahan: Yes, I joined it to promote racial equality.
Belenky: By any means necessary?
Callahan: Yes, but…
Belenky: There is no ‘but’ here. We have provided you with the additional organizational strength to pursue racial equality.
Callahan: I brought considerable organization strength with me.
Belenky: True, but it was organizational strength divided. The SBARI provides the consistent organizational strength necessary for all successful revolutions. I remind you of what Bakunin said: “All tender and gentle feelings of kinship, love, gratitude, and even honor itself should be choked off in the revolutionary’s breast by the single cold passion of his revolutionary task. He is not a revolutionary if he has pity for anything in the world. He knows only one science – the science of destruction.” I don’t think that either you, Bishop Callahan, or Father O’Reilly, are showing the proper revolutionary attitude when you flinch at killing Mrs. Fitzpatrick. And maybe that is because we have different goals. I want to destroy everything white and Christian; it seems you want to preserve some white things and some Christian things.
Callahan: I have not flinched from violent revolution. I’ve supported necessary violence.
Belenky: It’s not for you to decide what is necessary violence. Nor is it for you to decide how the violence is administered. You see, it is not just enough for white people to be killed; they must also be humiliated and violated, their deaths should be horrific so they instill fear in the survivors and give the black murderers a sense of power so that they will feel empowered and emboldened to kill again and again.
O’Reilly: I understand all this, but Bakunin is not infallible; he cringed and crawled and denounced the Revolution when he was in prison.
Belenky: Of course he did, and he denounced his confession when he got out of prison. Why shouldn’t he grovel for political purposes? I would do the same thing in his place. Are you invoking the honor code?
O’Reilly: No, I’m not. Just tell me why Mrs. Fitzpatrick has to die?
Siegel: Because the revolution can’t proceed unless the ultimate debasement proceeds – that is, the rape of white women by black men. Isn’t that correct? [he looks to Belenky]
Belenky: Yes, that is correct. Now, are we agreed?
Callahan and O’Reilly: Yes.
Belenky: Good, then all that is necessary is that we work out the procedural details of the executions.
________________
Act V. Scene 3. London. Two months later, Christmas Eve.
[Grey, Chambers, the Montgomery family, Edward Owen, Bontini, Arthur Walker, and some forty or more parishioners of Rev. Grey who still attend his private services are present. Dinner and services are over and various Christmas activities are taking place. Arthur Walker says something to Rev. Grey, and the Rev. gathers Bontini, Chambers, Owen, and Walker and ushers them into his study.]
Owen: What’s the mystery, Reverend? I don’t want to miss any part of the English Christmas you promised. Soon, I’ll be back in South Africa, and my friends there will expect me to tell them something interesting about my trip.
Rev. Grey: You’ll be back to the main party shortly, Mr. Edward Impatience. Besides, this is not my interruption. Arthur has something he wants to share with us that he doesn’t want anyone else to hear. Not because he doesn’t trust the rest, but… well, we’re all of the blood here; you know what I mean. It’s a letter he wants to read. And he wants its contents to stay here.
Chambers: Have you read the letter yet, Reverend?
Rev. Grey: No, I haven’t, so I’ll shut up and give the floor to Arthur.
Walker: Gentlemen, I’ve come to know all of you. And I feel bound to you quite beyond the bonds of mere friendship. Shakespeare writes of a band of brothers. So we are, we few… [starts to choke up] Let me start again. I’d like to read parts of this letter to you, from one of our band of brothers whom you have never met, but who is one of us, and I know he and his… what shall I call him? He was James Miller’s client, but he became his friend. So I’ll say, James and his friend, Sean Fitzpatrick. Let me share this story with you; James asked that I share it with you, because he has become a firm believer in the mystical body of Christ. I’ll pick up about halfway through the letter [begins reading] –
___________________
“I was out of town on a case the night they decided to go for Mrs. Fitzpatrick. I didn’t know that the SBARI had figured out who it was that was making the hits on their black minions, but I don’t know that I could have done much to prevent it if I had known. I was on a kind of permanent retainer for Mr. Fitzpatrick, but there was no particular work I was doing for him at that time. I knew that he went armed wherever he went and would have been more than delighted to shoot any blacks who tried to attack him, so I wasn’t that worried about Sean. But I should have figured out that they’d go for Mrs. Fitzpatrick. I guess I was still blinded by a certain residual respect for the Catholic clergy. I knew O’Reilly and Callahan were thick as thieves with Siegel and Belenky, but I didn’t think they’d go that far.
“Looking back on it now, I realize that once some heathen god takes over your soul, you are no longer the same person that you were when you belonged to Christ. Dostoevsky is better at explaining such things than I am, but I’m here, and he is not, so let it suffice to say that the negro gods, not Christ, were at the center of O’Reilly’s and Callahan’s souls.
“O’Reilly went to Jeanne Fitzpatrick’s house for a ‘pastoral’ visit on a night when he knew Sean Fitzpatrick was at his daughter’s grave site. O’Reilly told her in advance that it would be best if the house was empty of servants and anybody else who might reside there, as he had some confidential matter pertaining to her husband to discuss with her.
“Once he was admitted it was an easy matter for Father O’Reilly to make sure the front door was open. After about a half hour, five hooded blacks came and took Jeanne Fitzpatrick and Father O’Reilly, who was still pretending to be on Jeanne Fitzpatrick’s side, to a wooded area outside the city.
“That was where I came into the picture. I was coming back from a two week trip to Atlanta, where I was finishing up with a case. It was my habit whenever I was near Sean Fitzpatrick’s house to go by it, just to see if all was well. I saw the hooded figures shoving a trussed up figure into a van. It was too small to be Sean, so I assumed it was Mrs. Fitzpatrick.
“I followed the van at a safe distance. And I ended up parked out of sight in a wooded area facing the swamps, which is where Jeanne had been taken.
“I had been so intent on making sure I didn’t lose sight of the van Jeanne was in that I hadn’t paid any attention to who or what was following me. As I left my car to get closer to Jeanne in order to attempt to rescue her, I was told to stand perfectly still after I dropped my gun. I considered turning and firing, but I’d be firing blind while my opponents would be spot on, because they presumably had their guns trained on me. I dropped my gun and they laid me flat on my stomach while they searched for a second gun. They didn’t find one, so they cuffed me with my hands behind my back and then told me to stand up.
“When I stood up I knew I had made a mistake by not trying to shoot it out with my assailants. There were three men facing me. Two were obviously hired gunmen. They didn’t wear the telltale all-back outfits of the gunfighters in the old Western movies, but I could still tell they were imported guns. Both men were white. It was the third man who made me realize I had made a mistake by not attempting to fire. The third man was Siegel; he wore no mask, which told me that he had no intention of letting me live. I cursed my stupidity and tried to look for an opening. There was none. They took me and made me kneel down, hands cuffed behind my back, next to Jeanne Fitzpatrick, who was in the same position as me only she had been stripped naked. Siegel gave us a graphic description of what was going to happen to us. I had enough of the stoic in me so that I didn’t – at least I don’t think I did – show any emotion on my face, but inside I was in torment even before they started the torture.
“Jeanne was done with pleading; she was praying when I was forced to kneel beside her. But Siegel told her to stop with the prayers or he’d make her torture longer and her humiliation even worse. So she stopped.
“I said my one prayer quietly under my breath, ‘Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on us, and deliver us from these our enemies.’ Then I tried the only gambit, which wasn’t much of a gambit, that I could think of. I appealed to the mercy of the only man in the group whom I thought might have some mercy in him, Father O’Reilly. I had no illusions about Siegel, the five negroes, or the two gunmen. Siegel was a Jew who had hardened his heart against all things human, the negroes had never known what mercy was, and the two gunmen were professional killers whose hearts had hardened in the course of their profession. O’Reilly, I reasoned, must have had some humanity when he decided to become a priest, and maybe I could awaken that humanity.
“‘Father, if we must die, couldn’t you use your influence to make sure it’s just a bullet to our heads. That would be more merciful than what you have planned.’
“‘I’d like to oblige you, Miller, but I can’t. You see, you don’t understand; the rape and torture is part of the ritual. These black men are not criminals; they are religious devotees.’
“‘Do you believe that, Father?’
“‘Yes, I do, I believe in the black Messiah; I believe that Christ was a negro whom the white men killed, and when Christ comes back to earth – and maybe he already has come back – it will be as a negro. And until the time when he makes himself manifest to us, we must sacrifice the whites.’
“‘Then why don’t you take Jeanne Fitzpatrick’s place as a sacrificial victim; are you not white?’
“‘Father looked at me, then to the heavens with a look of ecstasy on his face. ‘I am black by the grace of God. He has made me a black man inside.’
“I didn’t need to hear Siegel’s command, ‘There has been enough talk,’ to know that it was over for me and Jeanne Fitzpatrick. Father O’Reilly had left the God of mercy far behind.
“They took the handcuffs off Jeanne and staked her out on the ground. Then they positioned me to watch the proceedings. It was part of the ritual to make the white male watch the white female defiled before his eyes prior to his own death by torture.
“I wondered if they had already killed Sean Fitzpatrick or if they had failed to capture him, because I knew they would want him present at the rape and torture of his wife.
“Then I saw that Sean was present. Siegel had the trunk of his car opened, and Sean, bound and gagged, was brought to kneel down beside me. Now the ritual could begin. I kept repeating those words of the Psalmist: ‘Because he hath set his love upon me, therefore will I deliver him: I will set him on high, because he hath known my name.’ And after each repetition I said His name, ‘Jesus.’
“I couldn’t claim to be a church-going man – I couldn’t even claim to be a full-time believer – but I always reverenced Jesus, and I always felt His reality, His divine presence, the most acutely when the forces of hell were surrounding me. So at the moment when I recited the verse from the Psalms and then said His name, I really did feel that He was next to me. But what are feelings at a time like that? The torture was about to begin. And then I heard a cry, it was like the voice of God or one of His angels. The cry was, ‘Durch die Kreuz, erobern wir!’ and the first thing I saw was Father O’Reilly’s head roll past me. Then the hooded figure, all in black and brandishing a sword, was upon the rest of the devotees. The two hired guns had already had their throats cut before the ritual began, and the five blacks were too surprised to fight effectively. The hooded man – or angel? – dispatched them. Siegel was the last to die. He tried to pick up a gun that had fallen from the dead hand of one of the hired killers, but as he reached for it the hooded figure ran him through.
“I’m not telling the dramatic scene properly; I’m not doing it justice. But what can I say? It was the most horrific of nightmares turned into an incredible fairy tale in which the wicked perished and the good, at least good in the sense that we didn’t deserve the fate that Father O’Reilly had in store for us, triumphed. But why had we triumphed? No doubt we triumphed, because of the mercy of God, but who was His heaven-sent angel of mercy? As he stood there in the midst, he seemed like some great angelic knight of charity from beyond this mortal world. But as it turned out, our deliverer was quite mortal. I don’t know if he told you or not; quite possibly he had told you that he was on a fishing trip to Scotland or something. The heaven-sent angel was the Reverend Christopher Grey. How he got there and why he came, I’ll leave for him to tell.
“I don’t have to tell you, who know him better than I do, that Rev. Grey was a balm to the souls of Sean and Jeanne Fitzpatrick. After we disposed of the bodies and the vehicles in the swamp – the solitary nature of the place where they intended to dispose of us allowed us to dispose of their bodies – the Rev. Grey bade us all kneel with him in prayer. He spoke to Christ so intimately, so thankfully that I really think I saw Him standing there amongst us. It was only for a brief moment – I probably imagined it – but then again I never felt so near to God as I did at that moment when I knelt and gave my silent assent to Reverend Grey’s prayer of thanks.
“This bears repeating – Jeanne Fitzpatrick was spared the ultimate degradation, but her faith in the organization called the Catholic Church had been shattered. She needed Christ to step in and fill the void. He came to her through the Reverend Grey, who was now just as gentle as he had been fierce. He hadn’t managed to have the apocalyptic confrontation in the Roman Catholic Church as he had hoped, but he took the apocalyptic confrontation where he found it. After a lengthy conversation, he left Mrs. Fitzpatrick ready to resume her life with a better faith and a better hope than she had ever had before.
“As we left the Fitzpatricks at their home, the Reverend Grey whispered to me, ‘We won’t be able to get to Callahan, but we can and must kill Belenky before this night is over. Neither Callahan, Pierce or Truscott can maintain the Savannah Branch of the SBARI without Belenky. It will be built up again – Satan has so many tentacles – but still this will slow him down some.’
“Belenky was found dead in his bed the next morning. Foul play was suspected, but there wasn’t a mark on his body. Callahan didn’t try to run the Savannah branch by himself, so it has temporarily folded. And in the meantime Sean Fitzpatrick is trying to get Callahan removed from office for financial misconduct. And so it goes. What did the apostle say? Something about a battle against principalities and powers, wasn’t it? Best of luck on your side of the ocean.”
____________________________________
Chambers [addressing Bontini]: I should have known something was up when you told me that Reverend Grey was taking a two week vacation in the United States. The Reverend Grey has never taken a vacation in his life.
Bontini [smiling]: For Reverend Grey, a mission of mercy is a holiday, so I didn’t lie.
Chambers [addressing Arthur Walker]: Were you in on it?
Walker: No, I really didn’t know what the Reverent had planned, although he had asked me a great many questions about the area where the Fitzpatricks lived, so I should have suspected something.
Owen: I wish I had known about it; I would have liked to help.
Rev. Grey: I couldn’t ask your help, Edward. Your South African passport would have aroused suspicions.
Owen: Did you consider asking Ezekiel for help?
Rev. Grey [laughing]: I think he would have been a bit conspicuous. Besides, he is wedded to Kenya and his family. He won’t leave them, and I honor him for it.
Bontini: Still, it must be a very lonely existence.
Walker: I didn’t get that impression when I was with him.
Owen: Nor did I. He seems close to – how can I describe it? – to, well, to the eternal things. He feels God’s presence and his family’s presence.
Bontini: I think I can understand somewhat when I listen to you two describe him.
Chambers: One more question, if I may, Reverend.
Rev. Grey: Okay, but then we join the party, right?
Chambers: Certainly. Why did you shout, “Durch die Kreuz, erobern wir!” in German before you attacked? Doesn’t an Englishman usually speak English, especially at such a crucial moment?
Grey: Yes, he generally does. But at that moment — memory is a tricky thing — something came back to me from long ago.
On that night during the First World War, when I went after those wounded soldiers to bring them back to our lines, there was one soldier, the last one I brought back, who was not British; he was a wounded German soldier. When I got him back to our trenches, I could see he didn’t have long to live. And I could see that he knew he didn’t have long to live. He looked at me with such a sense of relief, because he was a Catholic, and he thought I was a priest of his church because of my clerical collar. I didn’t correct his misunderstanding, because I was sure then, and am even more sure now, that God doesn’t care about such technicalities. The man poured out his heart to me; he felt himself to be the worst of sinners, the worst that ever lived. I won’t violate his faith in me by repeating any part of his confession. I’ll only say that he was a good man and devout. I simply told him the truth, that Christ loved him and it was by His holy cross that we conquered. He latched onto those words and kept repeating them over and over as he held my hand. By the Cross we conquer, by the Cross we conquer. He died content, and I firmly believe that he had conquered, through Christ our Lord.
So in the heat of battle my memory went back to that German soldier’s words, “Durch die Kreuz, erobern wir.” That is why I spoke in German instead of English.
Bontini [makes the sign of the cross]: In Jesus name, amen.
All: Amen.
Owen: Now to the festivities!
[All exit except Grey and Chambers]
Rev. Grey: I was glad to see you brought your wife tonight. This is the first time I met her socially. The other times it was just a quick hello on my way somewhere. She seems to be a wonderful woman, but then she must be to have captured the heart of a man like you.
Chambers: As always, Reverend, you’re too kind. You seem to have cast me in the romanticized role of the ideal Englishman, a cross between Bulldog Drummond and Beau Geste.
Rev. Grey: And why not? That is how I picture you. You remind me of another policemen; a dear friend, John Talbot.
Chambers: Yes, I know of him. He was the real article; the last Englishman.
Rev. Grey: I loved him, and I still love him. Our loved ones don’t leave us, ever.
Chambers: I’ve never asked you about her [pointing to a portrait of Sarah Grey, Christopher’s wife], because I didn’t want to pry.
Grey: It’s not prying. She was my conduit to Christ. We all have one. I loved her, and found Christ through her. I can’t see her without thinking of Him nor can I see Him without thinking of her. It’s Shakespeare’s 31st sonnet. I only got to spend five Christmases with her in the flesh, but she is with me every Christmas. I was a farm boy with rather superficial notions of becoming a strongman-wrestler type like Frank Gotch or George Hackenschmidt. When I met her she elevated me and showed me something so much greater than my petty ambitions.
There is great evil in the world, my friend; you and I have seen more than our share of it. But there is the grace of God; it shines like the star of Bethlehem through women like my wife and men like John Talbot. I no longer feel any great separation between this world and the next. It’s all bound together by His divine charity. Let’s go celebrate Christmas.
[As they open the door of the study, the guests are singing Christmas carols.]
William Montgomery [handing the Reverend a glass of water]: Wet your whistle, Reverend. [Reverend Grey takes a sip and hands him back the glass] Would you do us the honor? And don’t be shy; you have the gift of song.
[The Reverend Christopher Grey goes to the center of the gathering and sings:]
Away in a manger, no crib for a bed, The little Lord Jesus laid down his sweet head.
The stars in the sky looked down where he lay, The little Lord Jesus asleep in the hay.
The cattle are lowing, the baby awakes, But little Lord Jesus no crying he makes.
I love Thee, Lord Jesus, look down from the sky And stay by my cradle ‘til morning is nigh.
Be near me, Lord Jesus, I ask Thee to stay Close by me forever, and love me, I pray.
Bless all the dear children in thy tender care, And take us to heaven, to live with Thee there. +
And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid. And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men. –Luke 2: 8-14
_____
Child Jesus
When the Christ-Child to this world came down, He left for us His throne and crown. He lay in a manger, all pure and fair, Of straw and hay His bed so bare. But high in heaven the star shone bright, And the oxen watched by the Babe that night. Hallelujah! Child Jesus!
Oh, come, ye sinful and ye who mourn, Forgetting all your sin and sadness, In the city of David a Child is born, Who doth bring us heav’nly gladness. Then let us to the manger go, To seek the Christ who hath loved us so. Hallelujah! Child Jesus!
–Hans Christian Andersen
__________
I drove by a church the other day that had a big sign, which read, “Happy Holidays.” I’m so used to seeing Happy Holidays everywhere at this time of year that it really didn’t, at first glance, strike me as something odd. But then when I thought about it, it did strike me as rather cutting edge. Are the organized churches now going to make explicit what has been implicit for the last half century? “We believe what the liberal establishment tells us to believe.” And the liberal establishment does not believe in the founder of the Christmas feast. From that disbelief comes all the “we musts” of Liberaldom.
The liberals tell us we must be multicultural, we must let Moslems into the European nations, and we must let blacks into our neighborhoods, our schools, and our homes. We also must let Aztecs overwhelm North America. And we must keep abortion legal, because a woman must have a right to choose. But must we allow any of those evils? Have the European people flourished under all the “we musts”?
It is my contention that what men have wrought with the support of the devil can be unwrought by men who are inspired by Christ the Lord. A case in point – I came into the anti-abortion movement in my mid-twenties. There was already, at that time, an old guard that had been protesting outside the local abortuary for about six years. I asked one of the grizzled veterans if we might do the unborn babies more good if we burned down the clinic instead of just standing outside and protesting. The G. V. told me an interesting story. When the clinic first started he went door to door in his parish and lined up over a hundred men who were willing to “visit” the clinic at night and burn it town. Then his parish priest got wind of their plans and condemned them from the pulpit. Thus the crusade ended before it began. The pro-life movement in that area became a movement of little mite, and then it moved on to become a pro-abortion movement that condemned all violence against abortionists. But what if Christian men had taken the other path? What if professed Christians of every church and parish had really fought abortion? What was wrought would have been unwrought.
Unfortunately that one parish was a reflection of organized Christianity’s response to abortion. If you don’t fight an evil, you will become part of the evil. It is easy to condemn men like Paul Hill and Richard Dear for being violent and mentally unstable, but how is it possible to act alone, as such men do, and not be unstable? They need the support of those people who claim to be Christian in order to stay militant and sane. When your Christianity is bred in the bone because you live amongst blood Christians, there is no need for the agonized lonely search for the right and the wrong of violent action against the enemy, because you strike in union with ten thousand other men of your own blood and your own faith. But that is the cleverness of the devil; he convinced the Europeans that what was important was their intellectual sectarian defenses of the Christian furniture in their local churches, not the defense of our common hope and the ethos that flows from a belief in our common hope.
The first betrayal starts with the betrayal of our racial hearth fire. From that betrayal stems the denial of Christ’s birth at His divine hearth fire. Once the divinity of Christ’s birth is denied, the blasphemers then go on to deny the reality of His resurrection. All the liberals’ “we musts” have been set up to kill the Christ Child in His crib. To restore the Christ Child we must oppose the liberals’ “we musts.” We must not be multicultural, we must not integrate, and we must not murder the baby in the womb.
God bless all Christians of the old European stock, may you have a Merry Christmas, free from the stink of liberalism. Next week and the week after, I’ll run a Christmas story. I’ll resume the regular blog in January.
A Christmas Carol
In the bleak mid-winter Frosty wind made moan, Earth stood hard as iron, Water like a stone; Snow had fallen, snow on snow, Snow on snow, In the bleak mid-winter Long ago.
Our God, Heaven cannot hold him Nor earth sustain; Heaven and earth shall flee away When he comes to reign; In the bleak mid-winter A stable-place sufficed The Lord God Almighty Jesus Christ.
Angels and archangels May have gathered there, Cherubim and seraphim Thronged the air; But only His Mother In her maiden bliss Worshipped the Beloved With a kiss.
What can I give Him, Poor as I am? If I were a shepherd I would bring a lamb, If I were a Wise Man I would do my part – Yet what I can I give Him, Give my heart.
So let us state what is true. God reveals Himself to us through the intimate, mysterious human relationships we form with our kith and kin. The moral beauty of the European hearth, where our kith and kin dwell, points us to the Star of Bethlehem. The moral depravity of the syncretic religion of rationalism and diversity points us toward the kingdom of Satan. The most counter-revolutionary thing that a European man can do is to refuse to bend his knee to the new diversity of races and faiths. Such a refusal will make the European man a sign of contradiction to Satan and his minions. And such is the European man’s destiny. He was born to bear witness, through his fidelity to the European hearth, to the Lamb of God who taketh away the sin of the world. – CWNY
__________
Robert Lewis Dear certainly does not look like a hero of a romance. And I can’t, with complete certainty, assert that he is one, because I know nothing about his motivation for shooting the two Planned Parenthood employees and the police officer. But if his intent was to strike a blow for the slaughtered innocents of our nation by striking home against the butchers of Planned Parenthood, then I heartily support him. The Planned Parenthood organization is one of the great satanic bastions of liberalism, and whoever attacks that organization should be lauded by all Christian Europeans. True romance often seems rather uncouth and gritty at its inception:
Dickson groaned. What had become of his dream of idylls, his gentle bookish romance? Vanished before a reality which smacked horribly of crude melodrama and possibly of sordid crime. His gorge rose at the picture, but a thought troubled him. Perhaps all romance in its hour of happening was rough and ugly like this, and only shone rosy in the retrospect. Was he being false to his deepest faith? (1)
You don’t want to be (at least I hope you don’t) like the Fox News people who worship the fighting man simply because he is a fighting man. A soldier or a policemen is not absolved from the responsibility of making sure that what he fights for is something worthy of fighting for. It’s a tragedy that the police officer had to die, but his death cannot be laid at the doorstep of Robert Lewis Dear. The police officer did not have to – indeed, he should not have – come to the aid of the baby killers. No white man should sign up to protect and serve the butchers who work for Planned Parenthood, whose mantra is, “First we kill the babies, then we dissect them and sell their body parts.”
Any attempt to actually fight, in the fullest sense of the word, the forces of Liberaldom – whether the fight is against the abortionists, the Aztecs and black barbarians who rape and murder whites, or the Moslem invaders – always leads to the liberals joining with their clerical allies to condemn violence. It is un-Christian, they tell us. Shouldn’t that give a man who calls himself a Christian reason to pause and question the rightness of a fighting faith? How can he be right when the vast majority of professed Christians are against him? No, it should not give him pause. First, the right or wrong of any action cannot be determined by majority vote. And secondly, the white Christian who wants to fight back against the forces of Liberaldom is not in the minority if you allow our honored dead a voice. Do you think our European ancestors would have permitted the slaughter of babies in the womb, the murderous onslaught of the colored barbarians, or the Islamization of Christian Europe? No, they would not, so you must condemn your Christian European progenitors if you want to condemn the contemporary European who wants to follow the path of his fighting ancestors. But of course the modern church men do condemn their violent, racist, moribund, Christian ancestors. Imagine being so simple that you see an evil and immediately want to strike out against that evil. The condemnation of the “simple-minded” faith of the evil whites of old Europe has resulted in the slaughter of the innocents, the unrelenting murder of whites by colored barbarians, and the surrender of the European people to Islam.
Let us never forget when the liberals condemn any violence directed against them or their colored gods that the liberals are the most violent people on the face of the earth. They hire state executioners to kill babies, and they systematically disarm white people while encouraging the colored tribesmen and the Moslems to slaughter whites. The liberals are like the head gangster in the old movies, who fastidiously leaves the room before his mugs begin to torture the hero, because he claims his nonviolent principles forbid him to watch the torture he has just ordered to be done. The liberals have ordered the death of whites and the slaughter of the innocents, but they reserve the right to wear the cloak of sanctity while their henchmen do the actual killings and torture.
Such thoughts are not very Christmas-y, are they? (2) I wonder. Every single blessing in this world, and all our hopes for a blessing in the next, have come about because of the incarnation of Jesus Christ. So maybe it is quite in keeping with the Christmas spirit to attack the great haters of the blessed event in Bethlehem – those who hate so much that they must arrogate for themselves the power to destroy the life of the babe in the womb and the power to eradicate the Christ-bearing race from the face of the earth.
In the 1820’s Washington Irving wrote down his impressions of a Christmas celebration that he witnessed as a guest in an English manor house. Irving, like P. G. Wodehouse after him, never professed to be a Shakespearean diver into the depths of the human heart. He was a humorist with modest goals:
What, after all, is the mite of wisdom that I could throw into the mass of knowledge; or how am I sure that my sagest deductions may be safe guides for the opinions of others? But in writing to amuse, if I fail, the only evil is my own disappointment. If, however, I can by any lucky chance, in these days of evil, rub out one wrinkle from the brow of care, or beguile the heavy heart of one moment of sorrow; if I can now and then penetrate through the gathering film of misanthropy, prompt a benevolent view of human nature, and make my reader more in good humour with his fellow beings and himself, surely, surely, I shall not then have written entirely in vain. –Old Christmas
But in seeking to amuse Irving does reveal to us something quite profound. The old Baron and his family, the poor relations, the workers on the Baron’s estate, and the community at large are all united in one common goal – to celebrate the birth of Christ, their common hope. They are not a racially diverse group, which might account for the fact that their faith and their joy is not feigned, it is something in the blood, which our modern Europeans who are bloodless shadows of men and women can never feel. This is more than a pity, it is a tragedy that the Europeans have traded their provincial “racist” faith in our Blessed Savior for a cosmic faith in nature and nature’s god, the negro. Sometimes, late at night, they look back and feel a twinge of remorse. That is one of the reasons the liberals dare not look with a sympathetic eye at their European past. When they do, they feel like outsiders at a great celebration they cannot enter into, because they can’t understand why the celebrants are celebrating.
As the Moslems invade Europe, as the colored barbarians grow increasingly violent and hostile to all things white and Christian, and as the liberals prepare for the final satanic assault on the white race, it is hard to celebrate Christmas, because the Christian community, the European Christian community, has dwindled down to a precious few. If you go to church you will be told of the greatness of the negro and the evil of the white man. If you go out into the community at large you will find diversity of races and diversity of faiths. I take heart in Burke’s affirmation that a nation is a moral essence. We want the European lands to be one, white, and Christian, but if they are not, if they remain the home of heathens, colored barbarians, and liberals, they are not our nations. Europe is Christmas land; I can’t think of any European nation apart from that nation’s Christian past. If England, France, or any other European nation ceases to be one, Christian, and white, they will cease to be England, France, etc. Those nations will only exist where men are white and Christian. Burke likens Jacobin France to a house where robbers have broken in and dispossessed the homeowners. The real home exists wherever the former homeowners go, because robbers cannot be homeowners anymore than a coalition of Moslems, liberals, and colored barbarians can be a nation just because they occupy a geographic land mass in Europe. The moral essence of every European country will always remain white and Christian. Wherever that moral essence is, there are the nations of Europe.
In the early 20th century it became commonplace amongst European scholars to look down on the European people from their Olympian height and condemn all of the Europeans’ history as one colossal pageant of war and depravity. But is that how God, who is not an Olympian, sees our history? Doesn’t He who sees quite through the deeds of men see something else, something besides war and depravity? I think He does. He sees that the Europeans, responding to God’s grace, built another land within the land of sin, which the Olympian scholars, incorrectly, saw as Europe in its entirety. The antique Europeans built what the little children in the movie The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm called “Christmas Land.” Such a land cannot be seen with the outer eye of the Christian utopians. It can only be seen by the inner eye of love. Could any marriage survive if the wife saw only the faults of her husband but none of his virtues? I know mine couldn’t. The Christian scholars who tell us that there never has been a Christian Europe because the Christian Europeans were such incredible sinners, have no eyes to see with; they have separated their heart from their head and see only with the mind’s eye, not the heart’s eye. “Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter the kingdom of heaven.”
My heart and my sword as well is with those inhabitants of that old English manor house – those Europeans who still believe in Christmas land. That is the white man’s homeland.
Pure of heart and mind and hand, I shall dwell in Christmas Land; Christmas Land! Christmas Land! I shall dwell in Christmas Land.
(1) No doubt Robert Lewis Dear is insane, but is not his insanity a type of divine insanity that is necessary to counter the liberals’ satanic insanity? God forbid that we should, even for one moment, forget that the liberals are the devil’s own, driven by a satanic desire to destroy the image of God in man.
(2) In old Europe when the European nations were fighting (alas) with each other, there were Christmas truces. But there is no Christmas truce in Liberaldom. In fact the liberals step up their assault on the European people during Christmas. They launch a series of propaganda attacks, in film and print, the theme of which is, in the main, that our incarnate Lord was not the Son of God, He was only a forerunner of the Atticus Finch liberal. So long as Liberaldom stands, the Christmas season must always be a time of war as well as a time of peace for the reason that the enemy is attacking whites precisely because they are the Christmas people.
In the massacre in California that took place several days ago, the Jihadists chose a Christmas party as the setting for their massacre. And please note the difference between the justified assault on Planned Parenthood and the unjustified assault on the Christmas people. The former attack was condemned and used as an occasion to demand that whites disarm themselves. The latter attack was an occasion to scold whites about the dangers of blaming all Moslems for the bad actions of a few Moslems.
Every time Moslems strike, a host of terrorist “experts” come on the news and tell us what must be done. One expert’s advice was to “look people in the eye as you go about your daily business.” By looking people in the eye, the expert claimed, you can tell if they are terrorists. Well, even if such a process worked, what could you do if you ascertained they were terrorists, since our government has made it illegal to carry firearms in the areas where terrorists strike the most? The really practical and moral policy to prevent street and terrorist crimes would be to evict all Moslems, blacks, and Mexicans from the European nations. But if you are not going to do that, the next best policy would be to arm every white, not to disarm them. If whites are to be ducks in a shooting gallery, shouldn’t the ducks have the right to shoot back? Of course such a sane policy will never be adopted, because liberals are not about to arm their enemies. Which brings us back to the main point – the liberals hate the white, Christ-bearing race. They only want the military and the police to be armed, because the police and the military work for them. The reason they come down so hard on police officers who shoot black barbarians is because they want to send a message to the rest of the white police officers: There are no black, Mexican, or Moslem criminals, there are only white criminals. When liberals achieve their perfect world, only whites will be subject to punishment, for the crime of being white, which is the ultimate crime in Liberaldom.
It is a dreadful part of the example, that infernal malevolence has had pious apologists, who read their lectures on frailties in favour of crimes; who abandoned the weak, and court the friendship of the wicked. To root out these maxims, and the examples that support them, is a wise object of years of war. This is that war. This is that moral war. It was said by old Trivulzio, that the battle of Marignan was the battle of the Giants, that all the rest of the many he had seen were those of the Cranes and Pygmies. This is true of the objects, at least, of the contest. For the greater part of those, which we have hitherto contended for, in comparison, were the toys of children.
The October Politician is so full of charity and good nature, that he supposes, that these very robbers and murderers themselves are in a course of amelioration; on what ground I cannot conceive, except on the long practice of every crime, and by its complete success. He is an Origenist, and believes in the conversion of the Devil. All that runs in the place of blood in his veins, is nothing but the milk of human kindness. He is as soft as a curd, though, as a politician, he might be supposed to be made of sterner stuff. He supposes (to use his own expression) “that the salutary truths which he inculcates, are making their way into their bosoms.” Their bosom is a rock of granite, on which falsehood has long since built her strong hold. Poor Truth has had a hard work of it with her little pickaxe. Nothing but gunpowder will do.
When I was growing up the use of weights in sports was discouraged. My football coach, like many coaches of that time, told me to stop lifting weights, because he thought that weightlifting would make me ‘muscle-bound.’ Some twenty years later, every pro team in the country and most of the college teams had strength coaches, and movies like Pumping Iron had made body building a major sport. Ironically, as weightlifting came out of the closet, it changed from an activity that could enhance strength and health to a narcissistic activity that destroyed a man’s health and virility.
The puffed-up, steroid-using, body builders and athletes of today are the complete opposite of the old time strong men. Without access to exercise science gurus armed with PhDs, and without the use of steroids and total gyms, the old time lifters built bodies that stood the test of time. Many of the old-time strong men maintained their strength and vitality right to the end of their lives. George Hackenschmidt was still lifting massive weights in his mid-eighties as were most of the old time lifters who practiced the now antiquated ‘three days a week, with rest in between’ program.
Nor have the modern exercise science men discovered anything new about exercise. The old timers knew about circuit training and other such ‘modern’ innovations; they just didn’t have a fancy name for the ‘new’ techniques. But that is the essence of the modern world, gimmickry without substance.
I don’t intend to start an exercise blog – there are too many of them already – but I do want to segue from the modernity of the modern body building culture to the modernism of the liberal-conservatives. I dismiss the straight-out mad-dog liberals; they are the swine going over the cliff. It is the conservatives who are not conserving, going over the cliff with the liberals, that I want to discuss.
Burke was very clear about what a European statesman was duty-bound to conserve: the institutions, customs, manners, and prejudices that helped the Euopean people preserve their faith in our Common Hope. All changes in government must be changes to preserve the foundations of a Christian government, just as you would shore up a sacred monument with mortar and plaster, rather than tear it down and put up a new monument. Burke denounced the French Revolution with Shakespearean eloquence and passion, because he saw that the French Revolution was a radical break with the customs, manners, and prejudices of the European people who had believed, for over 1,500 years, in our Common Hope. Henceforth the battle would not only be with the pagans from without Europe, it would also be a battle against the post-Christians within Europe.
The modern conservatives are the spiritual counter parts of the modern steroid body builders. They claim to be improving and conserving while they are really helping the mad-dog liberals to tear down Western civilization by injecting a harmful poison into the European people. And what is that poison that is supposed to improve, but in reality kills? It is the poison of cosmic intellectualism as articulated by Albert Einstein in 1931:
“In primitive peoples it is, first of all, fear that awakens religious ideas—fear of hunger, of wild animals, of illness, and of death. Since the understanding of causal connections is usually limited on this level of existence, the human soul forges a being, more or less like itself, on whose will and activities depend the experiences which it fears…
“An important advance in the life of a people is the transformation of the religion of fear into the moral religion. But one must avoid the prejudice that regards the religions of primitive peoples as pure fear religions and those of the civilized races as pure moral religions. All are mixed forms, though the moral element predominates in the higher levels of social life. Common to all these types is the anthropomorphic character of the idea of God.
“Only exceptionally gifted individuals or especially noble communities rise essentially above this level; in these there is found a third level of religious experience, even if it is seldom found in a pure form. I will call it the cosmic religious sense. This is hard to make clear to those who do not experience it, since it does not involve an anthropomorphic idea of God; the individual feels the vanity of human desires and aims, and the nobility and marvelous order which are revealed in nature and in the world of thought.” – quoted in One Race, One Faith, One Shepherd (CWNY)
Who are the exceptionally gifted individuals that do not need “moral religion”? They are virtually all the European intelligentsia, both liberal and conservative. And the grazers, the people who should be the Christian faithful, have followed their leaders. For who wants to be ‘as stupid as a rhinoceros’ by subscribing to an intellectually inferior religion and the customs, manners, and prejudices attached to that religion? “Who is here so prejudiced, who will not support the massive influx of negroes and Aztecs into the European nations? Who is here so lacking in compassion that he will not welcome Moslems into the European nations? And who is so racist and illiberal that he wants his nation to be white and Christian while shunning all others? If any, speak, for we will purge that man from cosmic, multi-cultural Europe.”
The Christian churches followed in the train of the European intelligentsia. The liberals abandoned Christ entirely, and the conservatives betrayed Him by refusing to defend that which is essential for the survival of the Christian faith as a vital force in the life of the European people. We need to believe that we saw Christ face to face in the collective face of the antique Europeans. If they, the people who took Christ into their hearts, didn’t know Him, then how can we know Him? “We can know Him by a new, improved method, through the good offices of our intellects,” say the conservatives who have been shooting up with intellectual steroids to bulk up their highly developed brains. But is such a thing possible? What have the people on intellectual steroids produced? A world in which “mankind preys upon itself like monsters from the deep.” The barbarians of color kill whites and themselves with an increasing ferocity, the Moslems have marched right through the open gates of Liberaldom vowing that, “Your children shall be Moslems,” and not one public figure has called for the expulsion of the colored barbarians and the Moslems from the European nations. Why is this? Because the intelligentsia, the liberal elite that governs the white nations, do not believe in our Common Hope. If they did, they would not deliver up their own people to be tortured and murdered by colored barbarians. Nor would they allow the one true God to be replaced by the God of the Moslems.
The liberals and the liberal conservatives have detached themselves from humanity. They have invented a cosmic brotherhood of the intellect, which, from their point of view, makes them supernatural beings above the lot of common humanity. And they are right. They have left common humanity behind. They are like unto Satan, the archangel of intellect. Some, by the grace of God, might return to humanity and the humane God, but we can’t count on any member of Liberaldom joining the ranks of the European people. Their hardened hearts are poisoned against the light and we dare not mix with them on any terms other than martial ones, lest we be poisoned by them.
That leaves the white grazers, the men and women who have had so many false Aslans thrown at them that they can no longer see the real Aslan, the one who took flesh and dwelt among us, first in Bethlehem, Judea, and then amongst the people of Europe who took Him into their hearts. The white grazers are hovering between two worlds, the world of cosmic universalism where unspeakable cruelty and butchery dwell under the names of multiculturalism and democracy, and the world of His Kingdom come, a realm of charity forged out of a previously untamed pagan wilderness by the Knight Errant of charity and mercy. The people who loved much followed in His train and kept the flame of His divine charity alive through all the Christian centuries of their history. But now? Christ’s words come back to us with an overwhelming force: “When the Son of Man returns will He find faith on earth?”
In White Man Think Again, Anthony Jacob writes of the one fatal flaw of the white Kenyans:
It is very far from being my intention to belittle the people of Kenya and to add insult to their unspeakable injury. Their only fundamental fault, after all, was to be too trusting and innocent a people to be a party to that which was supplanting them. They trusted Britain unquestioningly and assumed the Native would prove himself grateful for what had been done for him. They trusted everybody because they are a trustworthy people themselves…
Yes, in other words the ignorance of our Western liberal intellectuals is killing us. The distortion of their university-adjusted vision is such that even when they clearly perceive every detail of a given situation, the picture in the mirror of their intellects is invariably upside down. It is a form of insanity, ethical as well as intellectual; an insanity which takes the form of a blind belief in the efficacy of so-called ‘good’ principles regardless of the circumstances in which they are applied; such as the giving of The Vote to people who cannot read or write, and the granting of ‘National Self-determination’ to tribes of stark naked cannibals. It is a ‘sideways with the people’ insanity; one of the deadliest of its manifestations being the belief that true goodness consists in depriving oneself of the power to do good. It is an insanity compelling liberal politicians to delight in bringing about the utter subjugation of their own white race.
Therein lies the fatal flaw of all white grazers. They cannot see the evil of liberalism. They are constantly asking why their government doesn’t protect them from the colored barbarians from within and the Moslem invasion from without, but then they never believe you when you give them the answer: “The liberals hate the Christ-bearing people because they worship darkness and not the light.” This is unacceptable to the white grazer. His local clergyman is a kindly fellow, he preaches niceness and universal love, and he wouldn’t sell his people down the blood red river of diversity. Nor would his conservative congressman; he has a democratic love for all mankind. Until the grazer understands that behind the façade of liberal niceness lurks the cold malignity of the devil, he will be forever bound upon the liberals’ wheel of fire, asking for the bread of charity and receiving a stone. That is the essence of liberalism: a stone, just as hard and impenetrable as the liberal’s heart.
Burke had hope that a leader would emerge who would inspire the white grazers of his day to rally and throw off the ideological Jacobinism that was taking over Europe. He died thinking that a champion of old Christian Europe had yet to emerge. But his humility kept him from seeing that a champion had emerged, a champion who saw through the outward niceness of liberalism to its satanic core. That Christian champion was Edmund Burke, who stands with Shakespeare as the great champion and poet of the white Christian race. With blinding sight he saw that it was the Europeans’ passion to love the good and hate evil that made them a race distinct from all others. Their passion linked to His passion made Christian Europe, and their descent to niceness destroyed Christian Europe. It is the task of the true European conservatives to live up to that essential truth so passionately articulated and defended by Edmund Burke, the great Knight errant of Europe: “They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate.” Forsake liberal niceness, love your people in and through Christ, and Liberaldom will come tumbling down, freeing the Europeans to do battle with and defeat the colored barbarians and the Moslem invaders.
The liberals’ little black puppet, The Obama, recently compared the new wave of Moslems invaders to the Pilgrims who came over from England many years ago. Is there any resemblance between a Moslem and a Christian? Is there any resemblance between the men who came to a geographical land mass to build a civilization and the men who now come to that same land mass to destroy a civilization? The whites will be pushed off the face of the earth if they do not forsake satanic niceness and start acting like their Christian forefathers. The false Aslan of Pope Francis and his ilk has poisoned Europe for much too long. It is time to look to the real Aslan, the Aslan of Alfred and Havelock, the one true God, who did not suffer, die, and on the third day rise from the dead so that men could celebrate satanic cruelty while flying the flag of multicultural, Christian niceness. “He is not a tame lion.” No, He is not, He is the Christ, the God of our racial hearth fire. If we forsake that hearth fire, we forsake charity, mercy, and Him. +
“The liberals’ incredible double-dealing is obvious. On the one hand we are told that we must abort all babies born in the European nations, because there are too many babies being born. And then on the other hand we are told we must allow an unlimited amount of Muslims into European nations. Why must we do this? Because we are commanded to go over the cliff with the swinish liberals who are possessed by the devil.” – CWNY
_____
Mahomet planted in Arabia a new Religion, directly opposite to the Christian Religion; yet such as did in a good Measure express in Words, the Life of a great Part of the Christians. This Religion was first embraced by the Saracens, who revolted from the Emperor Heraclius; whose Arms quickly subdued Arabia, Syria, Palaestine, Egypt, Persia, and afterwards they invade Africa, and came over Sea into Spain. But the Power of the Saracens was derived to others, particularly to the Turks, a very war-like People, who after many long Engagements with the Saracens, being desired to enter into a League, they easily embraced a Religion agreeable to their Manners, and transferred the Imperial Power to themselves. Having taken the Cities of Asia and Greece, and the Success of their Arms increasing, they came into the Borders of Hungary and German… This Religion, which was plainly calculated for Bloodshed, delights much in Ceremonies; – Hugo Grotius
__________
When something as dramatic as the Paris massacre occurs, I briefly, ever so briefly, hope that my people will “wake up” and become white men again. But then, like the man in the song called “The Green, Green Grass of Home,” I realize that “I was only dreaming.” (1) Men interpret external events according to the a priori passion that is in their hearts. I see the Paris massacre as the inevitable result of the white man’s rejection of Christian Europe for multicultural, democratic Europe. The liberal sees the massacre as a temporary setback on the way to utopia.
What is the difference between the Islamic Jihadist and the liberal? They both desire the death of white people, because of the whites’ Christian past, so why do the liberals seem outraged? The modern liberals are like the Jacobins who finally turned on Robespierre. They weren’t repudiating the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity, they were just repudiating Robespierre’s excessively violent way of going about the business of liberty, equality, and fraternity. If Robespierre had scaled down the blood-letting and toned down the rhetoric, he could have blended right into democratic-regicidal France. Let us never forget that former French President Nicolas Sarkozy said as recently as 2009 that France was a regicide nation. And so are they all – every single modern European nation – regicide nations. They have murdered Christian Europe and are committed to the extermination of the Christ-bearing race. So it is the excessive violence of the Jihadists that the liberals object to, not the Jihadists goal of eliminating every last remnant of Christian Europe.
The liberals’ second objection to the perpetrators of the Paris massacre has to do with the two camps’ differing views of utopia. The liberals envision a multicultural state in which everyone subscribes to liberal ideals. The Jihadists envision a utopian Moslem state in which everyone adheres to Islamic law. It is the mythical belief of the liberals that the Jihadists are not the real Moslems. In the liberals’ eyes of unreality the Jihadists are the bad Moslems who won’t settle down and enjoy the fruits of multicultural Liberaldom. (2) This is why the conservatives, who are not conservative, and their liberal allies never talk about expelling all Moslems from the European nations. That would run counter to the liberals’ faith that all religions except the Christian religion, and all races except the white race, can live in perfect peace and harmony so long as they make their utopia the complete opposite of Christian Europe.
The liberal stentors run the European nations, so the great lie, which would not have convinced a five-year-old from the 19th century, has become the constant refrain of the liberals: ‘Islam is good, those Jihadists are the small minority… etc.’ What can we expect from the people who have already told us that Mexicans and blacks are sacred?
As a result of the liberals’ ‘good and bad Muslims’ narrative the retired generals want to step up the bombing over there in order to get the bad Moslems. That would be a wonderful strategy, wouldn’t it? The American bombers destroyed Saddam Hussein’s government, which kept ISIS-like groups under control, so let us see if we can further destabilize the region with more bombing. Every solution but the obvious solution is suggested, the obvious solution being that we put an end to multiculturalism and expel all Moslems from the European nations. That is also the solution to the black and Mexican problem as well. But we will never see such a policy from European governments, because all the European governments are Jacobin governments, which cannibalize their own people in the name of democracy and multiculturalism.
If Africa, Europe, and the United States are to be reserved for the black race, if Mexico and the United States are to be reserved for the Aztec race, and if Islam is going to be the religion of the Europeans as well as the Arabs, where will white Christians dwell? It is not inhumane to send the heathens and the colored strangers back to their own lands, it is the only humane, Christian policy that a European can follow. If you don’t defend your own racial hearth fire, you are not a Christian; in point of fact you are worse than the heathens.
The white race is not being driven off the earth because of the Moslems, the Jews, or the colored barbarians. The white race is self-destructing, because liberalism has made white people defenseless in the face of the enemy. If you believe that it is sinful to love your own people, to feel a sentimental attachment to those smaller, familial, and racial units of life that Burke celebrates, you will not fight for your people. You will most probably fight against your own people. The antique Europeans had their problems with the Jews, the Moslems, and colored barbarians, but they managed to preserve their civilization despite having to battle the anti-Christian (and therefore anti-European) forces arrayed against them. And because they preserved their racial hearth fire they were able to turn a Christian Europe over to their heirs. Is our modern Babylon really better than Christian Europe? Is legalized sodomy better than heterosexual love sanctified by marriage? Is a culture that permits miscegenation better than a culture that does not sanction such a blasphemy? Should that charity of honor culture give way to the cruelty of Islam and black voodoo? It is liberalism that must be defeated before white people can reclaim their identity as a people and recapture the spirit to fight all the satanic coalitions of heathens and colored barbarians that our ancestors fought against so successfully.
Liberalism is a reenactment of the fall of man. The liberals have hardened their hearts against the Light of the world and turned to Satan for salvation from the Christian God. Adam and Eve hid from God after their fall from grace. The liberals seek to destroy all remnants of Christian Europe so they will have no nagging reminders of their fall from grace. And white people, even those whites who have completely repudiated Christian Europe, are a reminder of the pre-satanic era of European history. They must die. Such is the credo of the liberal.
Once we grasp the fact that the liberal’s heart is envenomed with a hatred for Christ and His people, we can understand why everything he does seems contrary to reality. We can understand why the liberal governments disarm their white citizens in black and Moslem urban zones of terror. We can understand why white “racism” is deemed a greater threat than colored barbarism, and we can understand why the protection of white people is considered an unholy blasphemy. In the liberal’s hardened heart, Satan is lord, and he sees everything from Satan’s perspective. Satan desires the physical destruction of the white race, but he also desires their spiritual destruction as well. This is why the liberals’ attack on white people always includes an attack on their past, their Christian past. “Despair and die,” Satan tells us through his liberal stentors. “Fight in my name and triumph,” our Lord tells us.
The violation of our race is the moral equivalent of a home invasion. If we don’t hold our racial home as inviolable then we have no soul that we can call our own. We will be mere shadows of men and women, roaming the earth hoping to find that which was lost. The conservatives who will not fight for that which was lost, our racial hearth fire, are not conservative. They are simply appendages of the liberals.
The Paris massacre is a slightly more dramatic event in the continual war against the white race, but it is not an aberration. The massacre is part of the liberals’ fantasy – a white-free world. No liberal or liberal conservative has changed one iota because of the massacre. The liberals still talk about kindness and compassion for the terrorists and the conservatives talk about bombing bad Moslems in order to make the world safe, not for white people, but for democracy. Right after the Paris massacre the Canadian Prime Minister announced his determination to go ahead with his plan to admit thousands of Syrian ‘refugees’ into Canada. Obama, Merkel, and all the church groups remain steadfast as well; they will not abandon their ‘compassion’; they will open up their hearts to their Moslem brethren. (3) And why are the Moslems the liberals’ brethren? Their lifestyle seems completely opposed to the liberals’ lifestyle. But then the blacks’ and the Aztecs’ lifestyles seem completely opposed to liberalism as well, so we are still left with the ‘why?’ Of course, we know why. The liberals have one overriding passion in their heart, one faith – there is one evil and that is whiteness. Whoever opposes the white race is good, no matter what they say or do that seems contrary to liberalism. Because the liberals believe that the Christ-bearing race must be destroyed, even if whites have ceased to carry the Christ Child, one is tempted to offer some practical advice to the white Europeans: “Since you are damned as the Christ-bearing race, why don’t you pick up that burden and actually become, once again, the Christ-bearing race?” But such advice is not really practical. Christ wants great lovers, not utilitarians. We must love Him with an overflowing heart that believeth and hopeth all things. We must become like unto the woman in the Gospels who had “an issue of blood twelve years.” She said, “If I may touch but His clothes I shall be whole.” If we could but touch His clothes, reconnecting with our white, Christian ancestors, we too will be made whole and be more than a match for the pestilence of liberalism and the savage onslaught of the Moslems and the colored barbarians. +
___________________________________
(1) The old home town looks the same As I step down from the train And there to meet me is my mama and my papa
Down the road I look and there runs Mary Hair of gold and the lips like cherries It’s good to touch the green, green grass of home
Yes, they’ll all come to meet me Arms reachin’, smiling sweetly Oh, it’s good to touch the green, green grass of home
The old house is still standing Though the paint is cracked and dry And there’s that old oak tree that I used to play on
Yeah, down the lane I’ll walk with my sweet Mary Hair of gold and the lips like cherries It’s good to touch the green, green grass of home
Yes, they’ll all come to meet me Arms reachin’, smiling sweetly Oh, it’s good to touch the green, green grass of home
Then I awake and look around me At four gray walls that surround me And I realize I was only dreamin’
There’s a guard and there’s a sad old padre Arm and arm we’ll walk at daybreak again I’ll touch the green, green grass of home
Yes, they’ll all come to see me In the shade of that old tree As I lay me in the green, green grass of home
By Burt Bacharach and Hal David
(2) What is never taken into account by liberals or conservatives is the extent to which contact with the Christian Europeans altered the behavior of the followers of the Jewish, Moslem, and Asian faiths. Their people became kinder and gentler without realizing the reason for their alterations. Now that the Europeans have repudiated the European Christianity of their ancestors the pagan faiths are resurfacing in all their naked Christ-hating fury.
(3) We should not have to prove that the Syrians entering the United States and Europe are terrorists before we deny them entre, any more than we should feel compelled to let a stranger into our home simply because he has proved he is not a murderer. Our nation, like our home, should only be welcome to our kith and kin.
The men of Walter Scott’s Europe would not sit idly by talking about economic systems and universal panaceas to end discrimination, while their people were slaughtered right in front of their eyes. They would act as Christian men should act in the face of a barbaric, aggressive invader devoid of the slightest trace of humanity. This insane, horrific, murderous attack on white people will continue unabated and in fact will intensify until white men acknowledge that the bardic Europeans of the past who loved and hated with all their hearts were the true men of the right. They believed in Christ risen and they believed that the first rule of charity, the charity that never faileth, is the love of our own people. At the moment that such love, the love of our own racial hearth, became a matter for rational debate, the white man was lost. Only he who remains faithful, faithful to all the instinctive promptings of a heart that still loves, will be able to help his people survive the dark night of Liberaldom and live to see His light descend, once again, over Europe’s green and pleasant land. – Our Race is Our People (CWNY)
__________
The movie Iron Curtain (1948) was based on the life of Igor Gouzenko. Gouzenko was a Russian national working in the Canadian embassy, who was a spy for the Communists. The movie depicts, in a very moving and convincing manner, Gouzenko’s gradual disenchantment with communism and his efforts to expose the communist cabal working against the Canadian government. At the film’s end, Gouzenko has successfully placed incriminating evidence into the hands of the Canadian officials, which results in the prosecution and conviction of a large number of Canadian communists. The one flaw in the movie was its ending. The narrator tells us that Gouzenko is now living secretly in Canada with the full rights of a Canadian citizen. That’s all well and good. But then the narrator goes on to tell us that Gouzenko’s greatest protection is the democratic way of life. And the movie ends on that very discordant note.
That one discordant note in the movie has become a liberal symphony of death for the white man. Gouzenko was able to defect to Canada because the Canadian people still had a remnant of Christian charity in their souls, not because of the West’s democratic way of life. The West was committed to a slower transformation from Christian Europe to Satanic Europe than the Russian communists, but the Canadian democratic system and the Russian communist system were rooted in the spirit of the French Revolution, regicide and atheism.
I recently saw a show that features the pro-abort, anti-capital punishment “conservative” Bill O’Reilly. O’Reilly was quite rightly railing against Harry Reid for refusing to allow the Senate to vote on “Kate’s Law.” Kate Steinle was the young woman who was murdered by an Aztec cannibal who had come back into the United States for the zillionth time in order to commit murder. His last crime was the murder of Kate Steinle. O’Reilly, to his credit, was incensed with Reid and the Obama administration for resisting a bill that simply called for the enforcement of our immigration laws in order to try and prevent murderous Aztec thugs from coming across the border to kill white women. O’Reilly kept asking, “Why would anyone object to this bill?” The answer is quite obvious to anyone who has not been blinded by the democracy myth. O’Reilly does not see that our “democratic way of life” is a system set up by Satan to destroy the white race. Obama and Reid are simply being true to their creed – “People of color must be protected, and the white race must be destroyed.” Until “conservatives” such as O’Reilly grasp that essential truth about our democratic system, nothing good will ever come of talk show blather from conservatives. I’m not holding my breath in anticipation of a great awakening from the conservative-liberals. The democratic way is their faith.
Reid, like all liberals, lied about his real intentions. He did not say that he opposed “Kate’s Law” because he hated whites and wanted to hasten the Aztecs’ conquest of the United States. Instead he said that the incarceration of Aztec murderers and rapists would be too expensive! I agree; that is why I think we should spare the expense of incarceration by executing the Aztec murderers right at the scene of their murders. One bullet would not be very expensive.
The belief in the democratic way that was supposed to save Gouzenko and is supposed to protect us will not save us from the wickedness and snares of the devil. Democracy is a fiery furnace that the satanically inspired liberals use to exterminate the white race. So long as the democratic way rules the West the fiery furnaces will continue to consume the white race. Every day more whites walk sheep-like into the fiery furnace.
Why are whites unable to read the signs of the times? Is it not crystal clear, particularly after the Angela Merkel declaration of war, that the democratic leaders of the West have launched their final assault on the white race? Does anyone think that the Merkels and Reids of the West will be defeated through the democratic process? War is not something a Christian European longs for. But a war in defense of home, race, and faith is certainly superior to a cowardly surrender to satanic liberals, heathens, and colored barbarians. Even if you prefer a surrender to the enemy in order to save your life, that will not be permitted. The forces of hell – the liberals, the Jews, the Moslems, the organized Christian atheists, and the colored barbarians – are all determined to kill the whites down to the last man.
The great obstacle preventing white self-defense is the white man’s lack of a sentimental attachment to his people. That was the main reason for the success of the French Revolution, and that is the main reason the white race faces extinction. The liberals in church and state, especially the liberals in the organized churches, preached a cosmic love of a generic mankind which was supposed to be superior to the love men used to have for hearth and race. “To be attached to the subdivision, to love the little platoon we belong to in society, is the first principle (the germ as it were) of public affections. It is the first link in the series by which we proceed towards a love to our country, and to mankind.” (Burke) The result of a cosmic love of mankind is a hatred of particular human beings. And what race of people has demonstrated a most particular and distinct humanity? It was the people who bound themselves to our Common Hope. What have the Europeans done to warrant the hatred of the liberal apostates and the entire non-European world? They loved much – “If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.”
The liberals could not live with Einstein’s cosmic faith. They needed a people, so they turned to the heathens and the colored barbarians whose collective face bears the imprint of Satan. The unspeakable, merciless cruelty of the Moslem, the colored barbarian, and the technological liberal is the result of their intense hatred of Christ whom they strike back at through His people. We can’t coexist with such an unholy coalition. They seek our blood and will always seek our blood until the end of time. Are such monsters of inhumanity to be stopped by an appeal to our democratic way? No, it is to the Hope of the hopeless that we must apply for aid. If the Europeans walk away from democracy and its attendant ecclesiastical systems they will find themselves in tremendous peril, but they will also discover that they have the spiritual force to fight the satanic forces of Islam, liberalism, and colored barbarism that once made them feel hopelessly overwhelmed. (1)
The problem with the “democratic way” as a source of salvation is that the democratic way celebrates the statistical aggregate. And a statistical aggregate has no charity. It’s easy to kill statistics, whether they are the sick, the infirm, the elderly, the babies in the womb, or the white race. The ethos of the colored hordes, to overwhelm by numbers, dovetails with the liberals’ ethos of the statistical aggregate. “Let’s count the numbers; we now have more colored barbarians and Moslems in Europe, so let’s vote for the extermination of the white race.” Will the white grazers then go willingly into the furnace? They will if they still retain their belief in the democratic way. What the white everyman always fails to grasp is the fact that liberals have left Christian Europe and its attendant ethos behind. The liberals have become metaphysicians, and there is nothing “more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician. It comes nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man. It is like that of the principle of evil himself, incorporeal, pure, unmixed, dephlegmated, defecated evil.” To place one’s hopes in the liberals and the democratic way is to seek redemption from the devil.
When our Lord left this earth He promised to send us a Comforter: “But because I have said these things unto you, sorrow hath filled your heart. Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.” Can there be any doubt, when we look at the totality of our people’s history, their Christian history, that our Lord kept His promise? He did send us a comforter. But what if we forsake that comforter, because he did not bring us a Kingdom of God on earth? What if he just enabled human hearts to know and love the Divine Heart? Isn’t that worth all the kingdoms of this world? Europeans have a great battle on their hands. If we go into that battle with the platitudes of democracy – “Have mercy on us because we are not racist, because we too are multicultural” — we will lose. If we go into the battle with the love of our people and our God, we will win. And by ‘win’ I do not mean it is written that our armies will triumph. But every battle fought in His name is a preparation for the final battle, in which Christ and those who call on Him by name will triumph. The farther we get away from the European hearth fire the farther we get away from that essential truth. Stay close to that hearth fire and all will be well. +
__________________________________
(1) Nothing will be done in Paris, London, or any other white European city to prevent the type of massacre that just took place in Paris. The people slain in Paris were sacrificed on the altars of multiculturalism and democracy. The blood red tide can only be halted by people committed to one race and one faith. The French President called the Paris massacre an act of war. Indeed it is. Then, Mr. President, act like you are in a war. Remove every single Moslem from France. The murderers are not bad Moslems, they are the ‘good’ Moslems; they practice their faith. I recently read of a small college that called their sport team “The Crusaders.” The President of the college decided it was time to get rid of such a violent image; it was not multi-cultural.
Enough said? If you jettison your white Christian past, the heathens will jettison you.
For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. – Matthew 6: 21
__________
I want to continue with John Sharp Williams’ mediation on sentiment, because it lies at the heart of the white man’s dilemma. The white grazers are divided men: They watch football games, shoot deer, and support the troops. They are not racists, yet they have a vague feeling that something is not right on the racial front. They have been told by the liberals in church and state that black violence is the result of white prejudice. “If whites were kinder, blacks wouldn’t have to be so violent,” is the liberal party line, which the grazer hears ad nauseam and does in part believe. But he only believes in part; hence there is a certain uneasiness in his soul that hinders his enjoyment of the football games.
Does a grazer ever wonder about the liberal inconsistencies? Does he ever ask himself, late at night before he passes from conscious to the unconsciousness of death’s counterfeit, why the liberals are so obsessed with date rape by white males that they now have issued legal documents that must be signed by both parties at each stage of intimacy, yet they are completely unconcerned about the violent rape of white women by Moslems and black savages?
And what about the discrepancies between ‘black lives matter’ and ‘white lives matter’? Does the grazer ever wonder why black lives, even the lives of murderous black thugs, are of vital importance, while white lives, even if the lives taken are innocent ones, do not matter? I hope the grazer is at least troubled by such things. But I really can’t be certain about the grazer, because he is so unsure of where his treasure lies. His heart is divided between liberalism and the un-liberalism of old Europe, so he grazes in the pastures of oblivion.
Ahab was able to over man the soul of Starbuck, his first mate, because Ahab had an overriding passion that ruled his heart: he wanted to kill the white whale. Starbuck, the grazer, had no overriding passion, so he was swept away by Ahab’s passion. In the end the grazers will support the liberals, because they, like Starbuck, cannot match the liberals’ passion, which is their hatred of the Christ-bearing race and their love of the savages of color.
What appears to be a death wish, the liberals’ hatred of the white and their love of the colored stranger, is really a liberal life-wish. A man cannot live by bread alone; he must have a faith. The liberals’ faith will destroy them, just as the demons’ hatred of Christ made them go over the cliff, but the liberals haven’t the moral vision to see that. All they see are colored gods who will rid them of the dreaded one, Jesus of Nazareth. The first apostles said to Christ, when He asked them if they would leave Him: “Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.” The liberal is too smart to be fooled by that gambit. He feels that he has a place to go: he will go to the new Babylon where he can worship the colored noble savage, free of the burden of the God-Man.
I’ve seen, on alternative news sites, that there is some resistance to the Moslem invasion of Europe in England, Hungary, and Poland, and I trust there are pockets of resistance in every European country. Any resistance to any part of the liberal agenda is certainly to the good. But if the resistance is to be sustainable, it must be anti-democratic; it must take its inspiration from the chivalric ideals of the antique Europeans. Burke was right when he saw that the loss of chivalric spirit was the main reason for the success of the French Revolution. And all the subsequent French Revolutions throughout Europe have succeeded, because “…the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators, has succeeded…”
If some stirring of the old chivalry has entered the hearts of white European males as a result of this recent Moslem invasion, that is all to the good. It will be an enduring good when white men return to their ancient faith, eschewing the anti-white, anti-Christian faith of the clergy, and fight in the name of Christian Europe. It is something we can work for and hope for.
When you voice your lack of faith in the democratic process, conservatives and right-wingers call you a ‘defeatist’ who believes there is no hope. Such people simply do not understand the older chivalric ethos of the antique European. I have absolute faith that nothing can defeat Europeans who follow the code of chivalry – the chivalry of Prince Phillip in the Sleeping Beauty story and the chivalry of the hero in Thomas Nelson Page’s short story called “The Goth”:
On the instant stood revealed, as though he had blown down the ages, a pure Goth, unchanged in any essential since his fathers had left their forests and through all obstacles, even through ranks of Roman legionaries, sword in hand had hewn their way straight to the goal of their desires. He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating, with all his heart – a Goth.
It is no pagan Goth that Page celebrates; he speaks of the Christian Goth who has not become enslaved to the Caiaphases in Christian garb that believe a Christian should kill his instinct to defend his racial hearth fire and become a universalist Christian who loves all mankind with a lukewarm ‘niceness.’ There is no real devil in modern clerical Christianity; Satan is only a wayward child who can be reformed by a few visits to the shrink. And there is no Christ, the Lord; He is now merely a captain on the Love Boat. The real gods are the noble savages of color, because they are the stuff that the liberals’ dreams are made on.
Burke’s assertion, “I hate abstractions,” was the equivalent of a declaration of war against the Jacobins in church and state. The Jacobins used abstractions to kill. The murder of a Christian King and Queen was called, ‘liberty, equality, and fraternity,’ and the defacing of the image of God in man was called, ‘moving mankind onward.’ The Muslimization of the nations of Europe along with the negroization of those same nations has been thrust upon us in the name of multi-culturalism, but what does that abstraction really mean? (1) It means the rape of white women and the torture and murder of white children, white women, and white men. No matter how fancy the clerical dress-up parties are, no matter how many football games our government provides, can a European man with one tiny ounce of chivalry left in his blood do anything else but cry, “Havoc!” and descend upon the liberals and their colored allies with a determination to fight to the knife against the devilish destroyers of our racial hearth fire, where our loved ones and the one, true God reside?
If we view the pagan European hero-gods as ends in themselves, as celebrations of the greatness of white genes, we miss the point of preserving those hero-gods. They are part of the Christian story. The hero-gods were preparing a place in their people’s hearts for the one true hero God. Prometheus stole fire from the gods in order to give it to man. For his charity, he was punished by being tied to a rock while birds of prey pecked at his liver. You can look on that story as proof that the crucifixion story is just a genre story repeated over and over again in the Jungian oversoul of mankind, or you can see that story as an indication that our Lord plants the means to know Him in all valiant hearts. Christ is the real Prometheus, but He did not have to steal fire from the gods, because He was God, the God who brought the fire of His divine charity to man.
The pagan hero-gods, like the fairy tale characters in the Grimms’ fairy tales (see The Inhumanity of Utopian Europe, CWNY) are dependent on the historical Jesus for their continued existence. If Christ is no longer embodied in a people as the one true God, He becomes an abstraction, a philosophical concept that can be used according to the whims of the ahistorical Christian atheists. There is no chivalry in Christian atheism, because the Christ who sets hearts aflame is not present in systems, and where there is no Christ, there is no chivalry, and Satanism in all its many guises reigns supreme.
In modern circles you label yourself an idiot if you talk about the devil as anything other than a Halloween bogeyman. But he is real, just as our Divine Savior is real. The devil wants the ‘intelligent’ men and women of the West to regard him and Christ as myth. That way he can work his will upon the intelligent ones who haven’t the spiritual wherewithal to call on Christ to aid them against the wickedness and snares of a devil they don’t believe in. But if we look at the world the liberals have built we can see Satan’s imprint on every aspect of it. In the new movie about Sleeping Beauty, put out by the anti-Disney, Disney Studios, Maleficent is now the heroine (see We Labor and Weep, CWNY). The satanic faiths and the anti-European people of color are welcome in Europe while the Christian Europeans are seen as pariahs to be pushed off the earth. And to add a satanic spice to the New Babylon, the sodomites have been given free rein. The liberals, while denying the reality of Satan, have built a kingdom of Satan on earth. They must put down any uprising of the real Europeans, the men and women with hearts of flesh, who are connected, through their people, to Jesus Christ. The liberals will allow organized, intellectual Christianity to stay around as part of Babylon, because the church men support liberalism, but there must be no chivalry in the ranks of the European people. That would indicate the resurgence of the true faith in the hearts of the European people, which would bring about the destruction of Liberaldom. When the real Christ enters human hearts, real miracles of chivalry occur. That is the nightmare of the liberal. We should want nothing better than to be the liberals’ worst nightmare. +
_____________________________________________
(1) The negroization of a nation goes hand-in-hand with the Muslimization of a nation, the pagan ethos of Islam appeals to the negro, whereas the poetic of Christianity does not appeal to the negro.
And yet, my friends, there are people who say that all this sort of talk is “sentiment;” that what we want to do is to “come down to cotton and corn and pork;” buying and selling, negotiating your bank exchange; that everything else is “sentiment,” and that sentiment is “rot.” Let it be a point with you, young boys and girls, to remember that the only thing in this world which is not “rot” is sentiment. That thing is rot which can last a man only a lifetime—which rusts and corrupts and decays—that thing, in other words, which can rot. Your cotton and produce are “rot;” your bank exchange is “rot;” your talk about mere material prosperity, as the chief aim and object and existence of man, is “rot,” because when you come to lie down and die and be placed within your narrow habitation, six or seven feet by three or four, not one of these things, nor things gained in this way, can you carry with you, nor present as a part of yourself at the chancel of God.
This brings us to the necessity of concluding that the upholders of mere dialectic, whether they appear in this modern form or in another, are among the most subversive enemies of society and culture. They are attacking an ultimate source of cohesion in the interest of a doctrine which can issue only in nullity. It is no service to man to impugn his feeling about the world qua feeling. Feeling is the source of that healthful tension between man and what is – both objectively and subjectively. If man could be brought to believe that all feeling about the world is wrong, there would be nothing for him but collapse.
– Visions of Order by Richard Weaver
__________
The other day I mentioned Heidi to a mid-twenties shop clerk and got a disturbingly blank stare. The young woman thought I was calling her a prostitute. I tried to explain that Heidi was a Swiss mountain girl in a story by Johanna Spyri. Still no light. This type of incident has happened much too often to me in recent years. It’s not as if someone has never heard of Marcel Proust or Samuel Becket. In addition to Heidi, I’ve gotten blank stares when I’ve mentioned Treasure Island, William Tell, Roland, Paul Bunyan – the list is a long one. Now, you might say, “So what if our young people have never heard of the classic stories of the European people, they won’t die without reading or hearing the stories.” I would disagree. Ignorance of one particular classic story from the European past will not kill a person, but what that ignorance represents, a total disconnect from the antique Europeans, will kill; it will kill the soul.
Our young people know computers by age five, they know everything about the biological facts of life by age seven, yet they know nothing of the people who built a civilization based on their sentimental attachment to Jesus Christ. And I use the word ‘sentimental’ without shame. We all, even those who claim to be devoid of sentiments, get sentimental about something. The liberal waxes sentimental over the negro, the Marxist gets sentimental about ‘the people’ (in the abstract, of course), and so it goes. I get sentimental over the marriage between Christ and the European people – Tom Brown’s defense of little Arthur, Pip’s loyalty to Magwitch, and Havelock’s relief of Lucknow make me weep. If you spit on such sentiment, you are my enemy.
It was Burke, the indefatigable Christian warrior, who sounded the alarm and rode, alone and unafraid, to the sound of the revolutionary guns. Burke saw that the French Revolution was not, as terrible as that war was, merely a French version of England’s War of the Roses. It was not a bloody quarrel between rival claimants for the throne. The French Revolution marked a divorce from Christ, from that one great sentimental attachment which was the lifeblood of the European people, the attachment upon which European civilization was built. It was not enough to depose Robespierre, Burke maintained; that was merely scotching the Jacobin snake; the Jacobin snake had to be destroyed. But the snake was not destroyed. It resurfaced again in the democratic Revolutions of 1848 and in the Northern rebellion against the Christian south, a war that marked the last defense of the sentimental attachment, which made the European people a people unlike all other people. The European people left Christ and hid in the belly of the liberal leviathan.
The conservatives of the 20th century did not choose to do battle with the liberal leviathan. Instead they tried to make life more comfortable inside the belly of the leviathan. That is not following in their train, the antique Europeans; it is following in the satanic train of the liberals. A true man of Europe, a man with a sentimental attachment to his people and our common hope, must fight his way out of the belly of the leviathan and then turn and attack the leviathan.
What happened to the conservatives was that they thought a mere Gnostic connection to a Christian system could replace a sentimental attachment to Christ and the European people. There is a world of difference between “Defending our Judaic, Greco-Roman, Christian heritage” and defending “Him who is our common hope.” Even those conservatives who quoted Burke favorably failed to see that it was his passionate love of his people and his God that guided his mind and pen:
But vehement passion does not always indicate an infirm judgment. It often accompanies, and actuates, and is even auxiliary to a powerful understanding; and when they both conspire and act harmoniously, their force is great to destroy disorder within, and to repel injury from abroad. If ever there was a time that calls on us for no vulgar conception of things, and for exertions in no vulgar strain, it is the awful hour that Providence has now appointed to this nation. – Letters on a Regicide Peace
It is very significant that Burke’s 20th century counterpart, a man who placed his mind at the service of his heart and defended sentimental, European Christianity while denouncing in the strongest terms the New Age intellectual Christianity, is absent from all the survey books of modern conservatism. Anthony Jacob, the last great European, was too European, too Christian, to fit into the liberal-conservative system. His vision was one with Burke’s vision – they saw the European people as the Christ-bearers who must maintain their distinctiveness as a people if they, and their faith, were to survive.
What Europeans such as Edmund Burke, John Sharp Williams, and Anthony Jacob perceived was that it was the Europeans’ sentimental attachment to Christ that needed to be conserved, not our ‘democratic system’ or some ecclesiastical system. I saw the satanic temptation close-up in the ‘systems analysis’ Catholic traditionalist movement. Having fought free of the leviathan’s belly, I found myself in the open seas. Any old port in the storm can lead one to the wrong port. Once aboard the traditionalist ship, I was ushered into a room marked, “For Sentimentalists.” There was a chute in the room (like in the board game Chutes and Ladders), which put me right back into the sea, with the leviathan bearing down on me. Eschewing all the other ecclesiastical ships, I found a safe harbor in that tiny island where Alexander Smollet, that European sentimentalist, has raised the flag of Christian Europe in defiance of the forces of Babylon that have taken the form of a monstrous leviathan.
Intellectual conservatism in church or state does not ‘conserve’; it is part of the forward movement, a movement toward hell, of Jacobinism. The more liberal branches of organized Christianity, which are now part of organized Jewry, go whoring after the black Messiah in order to feel attached to something human. And the traditionalist branches of organized Christian-Jewry have embraced the practical materialism of the Grand Inquisitor: “Of what use is the human element when we have a system?” But does St. Paul give us a ‘system’? Do the Gospels point us to a ‘system’ or to a savior, who is Christ the Lord? That deeply held sentiment, the heartfelt conviction that, “Truly this man was the Son of God,” was what moved our ancestors to fight the forces of ruin and death in order to build Christian Europe. It is those ancestors we must look to for succor, and it is to their faith that we must come if we are going to rebuild Christian Europe.
It is definitely a rebuilding that needs to occur, a spiritual rebuilding. Most of the actual buildings of old Europe still stand, but they no longer house Christian Europeans. In the old dwellings reside the new Babylonians, an assortment of white apostates, Muslims, and colored barbarians. That does not strike the modern Europeans as something tragic. Tony Blair’s statement that, “We must be multi-cultural,” has become the ruling ethos of every European nation. But neither the Jews, the Muslims, nor the colored barbarians believe in multiculturalism. They believe in conquest and the imposition of their culture on people who haven’t enough faith in their God or their people to fight for them. We are back with Peter. By denying incarnational Europe we have denied, like Peter, our Lord. “Lovest thou me?” Christ asks. And we reply, “Lord, thou knowest that we love thee.” “Then,” He tells us, “Rebuild Christian Europe.”
The first apostles had one great advantage over us: They saw Christ face to face. Is it possible to believe with their intensity, without that material confirmation of Christ’s divinity? Christ seemed to think that it was, because He mildly rebuked Thomas for His lack of faith: “Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou has believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.” Therein lies the profound miracle of Christian Europe. Our people believed without seeing the material Christ! They saw Him feelingly, and made Him, by virtue of a sympathetic communion of hearts – the divine Heart with human hearts – the center of their civilization. Christian Europe revealed, at its poetic core, the face of Jesus Christ. All attempts to scientize the European Christ, to make Him accessible to human beings by way of the syllogism or the science lab, had the end result of making Christ inaccessible to the human heart. The church men and their modern neophytes go whoring after the heathen gods of color, because they have nothing to hold onto “if but for sympathy.” They have no sympathy with anything human, because they walk in the valley of the shadow of abstractions in which the devil fills their minds with dreams of an earthly paradise presided over by the devil gods of color. There is no mystery, no depth, in such a world. The only real mystery is God’s grace and the human heart. Great miracles have already occurred in old Europe, because of that marriage. Isn’t it more than possible, isn’t it quite probable, that miracles will occur again once the Europeans rely on God’s grace working in human hearts instead of relying on human minds with pygmy souls trying to create their Jacobin version of heaven on earth? The former response to existence resulted in Christian Europe; the latter response has brought us Babylonian Europe.
The liberals’ ‘ascent’ has been a descent. If we retrace our steps and go through the provincial European door we will find ourselves back on the time-worn and time-honored path of our people, the Christ-bearers. And we shall stay with them till the end of time, because of our sentimental attachment to those people of our own hearth fire and to the God of that simple European hearth fire. +
You do me wrong to take me out o’ th’ grave Thou art a soul in bliss; but I am bound Upon a wheel of fire, that mine own tears Do scald like molten lead.
–King Lear
_____
And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified. He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay. And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead; and, behold, he goeth before you into Galilee; there shall ye see him: lo, I have told you. And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word.
–Matthew 28: 5-8
__________
When I was in my early twenties, abortion was legalized in the United States, and in reaction to the liberals’ technological barbarism a number of “pro-life” groups sprung up. I belonged to several pro-life groups until we parted ways over the proper way to defend the unborn. I thought, considering what abortion was, that the “war against abortion” should entail all that the word war implied. Nathan Bedford Forrest put it quite well: “War means fighting and fighting means killing.” There was a lack of proportionality, which has increased over the years, between what the pro-lifers said abortion was – the murder of an innocent child – and what they proposed to do about abortion – write letters to their congressmen and educate liberals. Congress turned a deaf ear to anti-abortion protestors, and the liberals refused to be educated, because legalized abortion was not the result of a misunderstanding – the liberals knew they were sanctioning mass murder. What was needed were Christian warriors who were willing to do unto abortion doctors and liberals according to what the abortion doctors and liberals were doing unto babies. That never happened. What did happen was what always happens when the lukewarm try to fight a satanically-inspired enemy with empty platitudes instead of hearts of fire. The pro-lifers were absorbed by the liberals and became the greatest opponents of anti-abortion violence. Being polite to liberals so that they would not be able to label pro-lifers as ‘violent’ and ‘undemocratic’ was more important to pro-lifers than the lives of unborn babies. Thus legalized abortion became a sacred rite, and the pro-lifers assuaged their consciences by protesting against the sale of the murdered babies’ body parts. This is supposed to be a much more practical and democratic means of “fighting” abortion. Really? Wouldn’t it be more ‘practical’ to stop the abortions by killing the abortionists before the babies were murdered rather than trying to reprimand the body parts’ salesmen after the fact? The pro-life movement was dead from its inception, because pro-lifers appealed to “our democratic tradition of equal rights for all,” in order to put an end to legalized abortion. But it was our democratic tradition of equality, fraternity, and liberty that brought legalized abortion upon us. Why should we seek redemption from the devil? The pro-lifers condemned their Christian European past (they regularly equated abortion with Southern slavery in order to curry favor with the liberals), and by condemning their past they thought the liberals would end abortion, based on a secularized myth of equal rights. How little the pro-lifers understood the Jacobin nature of American democracy. ‘Some are always more equal than others.’
The white nationalist movement, to the extent that it is a movement, has followed in the path of the pro-lifers. The white nationalists do not look to the European people’s Christian past for the strength to fight the liberals and the barbarians of color. Instead they condemn the Christian Europeans — some have even gone so far as to condemn the white South Africans for practicing apartheid – and look to a new pagan, white Übermensch, who will play a leading role in the New World Order. But once you choose to fight secularized Jacobins with the atheistic assumptions and democratic platitudes of those same Jacobins, you will be absorbed by the Jacobins and destroyed by them.
There is no strength, no blood, in our Nordic, Greco-Roman heritage if we see that heritage as an end in and of itself. Those pagan civilizations only have significance because in the end the best of the pagans bent their knees to Christ. Europeans do not have a Nordic, Greco-Roman heritage, they have only one heritage, just as there is only one God. Christ became the Europeans’ hero God, the one true God to whom all the heroes of the Norsemen, the Greeks, and the Romans gave way. The philosophers of Greece and Rome never did give way to Christ, and they have always constituted a fifth column in the ranks of the Christian Europeans.
The result of Hardy’s management was that Tom made a clean breast of it, telling everything, down to his night at the ragged school, and what an effect his chance opening of the Apology had had on him. Here for the first time Hardy came in with his usual dry, keen voice, “You needn’t have gone so far back as Plato for that lesson.”
“I don’t understand,” said Tom.
“Well, there’s something about an indwelling spirit which guideth every man, in St. Paul, isn’t there?”
“Yes, a great deal,” Tom answered, after a pause; “but it isn’t the same thing.”
“Why not the same thing?”
“Oh, surely, you must feel it. It would be almost blasphemy in us now to talk as St. Paul talked. It is much easier to face the notion, or the fact, of a demon or spirit such as Socrates felt to be in him, than to face what St. Paul seems to be meaning.”
“Yes, much easier. The only question is whether we will be heathen or not.”
“How do you mean?” said Tom.
“Why, a spirit was speaking to Socrates, and guiding him. He obeyed the guidance, but knew not whence it came. A spirit is striving with us too, and trying to guide us–we feel that just as much as he did. Do we know what spirit it is? Whence it comes? Will we obey it? If we can’t name it–we are in no better position than he–in fact, heathens.”
The pagan wheel has come full circle. Platonic Gnosticism serves as the intellectual backdrop, and paganism, devoid of faith, serves as the white nationalists’ flag. Their quarrel with the Jacobin left is an internecine quarrel that can only result in the absorption and then the destruction of the white nationalist movement at the hands of the Jacobin left.
St. Paul speaks to us still: he speaks of a better way, he speaks of the true faith, the only faith for men of blood, the faith in the God-man who knows not Kismet, who knows not demographics: He knows only charity, and He comes to us only through charity. The bards of Christian Europe confirm the Biblical truth: God has written the European people into His story. If we stay true to that story, we will not be defeated by “the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.”
Lear feels that he is bound upon a wheel of fire, that his “own tears do scald like molten lead.” It is Cordelia’s charity that lessens Lear’s pain on that existential wheel of fire, and it is Christ’s divine charity that lessens our pain on that same wheel of fire, and gives us hope that the endless circular wheel of paganism, the wheel of fire, can be turned into a straight path that leads to His Father’s house. Our people did not ‘will’ a God of their own making into existence by virtue of their minds. They found their creator because they had hearts of flesh, willing to receive Him. We are the Christ-bearing people, not the God-creating people. Pride of race, pride of intellect belong to the heathens of color and the philosophers, theologians, and scientists – the fifth column. The Christ-bearing European has the love of race, a mind subordinate to His mind, and a heart in communion with His heart. This was our ancestors’ faith, and it is the type of faith that makes a man stand athwart the pass and cry ‘halt’ to the heathen invasion of Europe.
I first came across the blasphemy that the white man ‘created’ his own God in an article by Kevin Strom. Since that time I have seen it repeated countless times in articles by the intellectual brain trust of the new white nationalists. This won’t do. If a man doesn’t believe in Christ, he will serve Satan. Even though the non-believer doesn’t believe in Satan, the archangel still exists, and he will use the Christian apostate to serve his purposes. He will come to him in one of his many disguises. He comes to the liberal church men in the form of the black messiah; he comes to the white nationalists in the form of a disembodied white intellect who plays at demographics, democracy, and science. The battle against the colored hordes has not yet begun, because the true European, the Christian European, has yet to enter the lists. When he does, he will draw others to him, just as Christ does, and the counterrevolution will begin.
Nothing better illustrates the lack of an integral Christian European influence in the modern world than the perpetual apologies that are on the lips of every white European. The apologies are cheap, vicious apologies, because they are not personal apologies. They are apologies for dead white males who stand before the liberal docket accused of racism and sexism. And they stand before the white nationalist tribunal accused of idiocy and a lack of scientific acumen. (They actually believed that Christ rose from the dead on the third day!) But it is God Himself whom the liberals and the neo-pagans have placed in the dock when they continually apologize for the white Christians of old Europe, because our people’s vision of God was true. If they stand condemned, then so does God. Where will the moderns go, to whom will they turn now that they have placed the Christian God in the dock and found Him wanting? We have seen where they will go. They have returned to the pagan wheel of fire. And to whom? Their saviors are legion – the black messiah, the yellow gods, the white, disembodied intellect – the gods who are legion are as infinite as the sands of the desert. The apology culture of the new Europeans leaves us in a vast empty universe that is devoid of all faith, honor, and love.
Portia begs Shylock to be merciful, but he will have his pound of flesh:
PORTIA Why, this bond is forfeit! And lawfully by this the Jew may claim A pound of flesh to be by him cut off Nearest the merchant’s heart.—Be merciful. Take thrice thy money. Bid me tear the bond.
SHYLOCK When it is paid according to the tenor. It doth appear you are a worthy judge. You know the law. Your exposition Hath been most sound. I charge you by the law, Whereof you are a well-deserving pillar, Proceed to judgment. By my soul I swear There is no power in the tongue of man To alter me. I stay here on my bond.
Therein lies the tragedy of the post-Christian European. He has become like unto the unrepentant Jew: he will have his pound of flesh from the ancient Europeans, because they are responsible for every evil under the sun. But from whom is the modern European really demanding a pound of flesh? Who stands behind the antique Europeans? It is the God who said, “I will have mercy, not sacrifice.” +
CONTENT UPDATE 7/10/23: All of CWNY’s works have been saved in 7 volumes (PDFs) on the Preservation page. They represent the most complete and accurate versions of his writing so far; they contain no images, just the text.
On August 1, 2021, CWNY ceased writing and passed to be with our Lord Jesus Christ; his family chronicles his passing on the page The Minstrel Sleeps (8/7/21). All his posts from 3/3/12 through 7/31/21 are on this site, via the Home page. All posts from CWNY’s older blog from 2006 – 2012 are also still available online here.
You may recall the deplatforming of CWNY’s first wordpress blog in March of 2019 (see the page On Being Deplatformed (4/21/19). When CWNY returned the next month with his new domain, unfortunately many posts from 3/3/2012 – 3/23/2019 remained inaccessible. Following his death, all of these ‘lost’ posts have been incorporated into this site by his family; see the Preservation of CWNY’s work page for more detail.
On the Preservation of CWNY’s work page, you may download pdfs of both this blog and the original blog, in their entirety. All posts are available in 7 complete volumes in PDF format, with no images, and in 2 incomplete PDFs containing most of the images and text. In addition, a download of CWNY’s Christmas Remembrances is also available on the Preservation page.
The Remembrances by CWNY page includes his final, albeit unfinished, Christmas story, accompanied with links to his previous Christmas stories. In addition, as noted above, all 11 Remembrances‘ chapters may be downloaded in one PDF from the Preservation of CWNY’s work page.
We would love to hear from those of you whose hearts have been touched by CWNY in some way. The How to contact CWNY’s family page explains how to do this.
May God bless you, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. We take comfort in His words, “In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.” –John 16:33