Armed with Cruel Hate

Posted on October 7, 2017 by cwny

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,  Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. –2 Timothy 3: 1-7

__________

After the Antifa threat and the subsequent Antifa massacre in Las Vegas, a woman of my acquaintance, a white grazer, asked me what I thought of the Antifaers. When I told her they were possessed by the devil and were hell-bent (pun intended) on destroying the white Christ-bearing race, she was very disturbed. I hadn’t told her what she wanted to hear. It is very unsettling to think that one has an enemy who cannot be appeased by anything less than your heart’s blood. But what is the use of lying to ourselves? Isn’t it crystal clear now? It wasn’t crystal clear to that woman, and it isn’t crystal clear to the rest of the white grazers.

Satan had to morally anesthetize the white race before he could work his will upon them. And he has done that quite well. Whenever the colored heathens or the Jacobins, which is what the Antifaers are, commit atrocities, the white grazers instinctively (such instincts have now been bred in their bones) look for the white provocation of the violence: “We have not gotten the blacks jobs,” or, “Trump is too confrontational.” It is always something the white man has done that causes violence, because, as church, state, and academia tell us, the white man is evil. And although this makes the white grazer somewhat uncomfortable, he accepts the theology of the white man’s responsibility for the evil that men do. He accepts it, because he respects the moral authority of his leaders in church and state, and he accepts it because he would rather think that the bloodletting can be halted by appeasement than face the fact that he has an enemy that cannot be appeased, because that enemy is driven by a satanic hatred for the white race.

In the old Christian hymn, “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God,” we are told that our enemy is “armed with cruel hate.” It’s curious, now that Satan has become so visible through the works of his minions, that modern Europeans thoroughly reject the notion that Satan prowls about the world seeking the ruin of souls. But then again maybe it is not so curious. Since Christ has become less visible in the works of His people, wasn’t it inevitable that men would redefine and rehabilitate the devil? Christ has been demythologized, and so has the devil.

I doubt there is a single mad-dog liberal (they call themselves Antifa) who believes in the devil. But the devil does not want their belief. If they truly believed in his existence they might come to believe in Christ. What the devil wants is the liberals’ compliance with his will. And he has that. What is the devil’s will? To attack God by destroying His people. His great frustration is that he must work through humanity to strike at God. The great hater of mankind, the archangel who spits on the God-man and the image of God in man, must work through human beings in order to obtain his will. So must our Lord work through human beings, but the divine condescension was not abhorrent to our Lord and Savior — He took flesh and dwelt among us. ‘Tis not so with the devil. He does not move men’s hearts with his sacrifice, he moves men’s minds with his appeals to their pride and self-will. What will the Antifaers gain by the destruction of the white Christ-bearing race? What did Satan ultimately gain by his rejection of God? He gained hell and lost heaven. And that is what the Antifaers want. They want hell on earth. And when do they want it? They want it now. The liberals are like unto Lady Macbeth — the new generation no longer tries to disguise it: “Fill me from the crown to the toe top full of direst cruelty! Make thick my blood; stop up th’ access and passage to remorse, that no compunctious visitings of nature, Shake my fell purpose, nor keep peace between th’ Effect and it!”

The devil does not necessarily want the Antifaers to be so blatant. He can inspire them, he can fill them from crown to the toe top with direst cruelty, but he cannot personally take charge of their war against whites. Did he want the German Jacobins to say we’ll bring you hell? Did he want the American Antifaers to say they were going to disrupt the nation by whatever means necessary? And did he want that Las Vegas shooter to kill all those white people? I don’t know. If the white grazers are aroused by such bloodletting then the liberals have miscalculated. But it doesn’t seem the grazers will be aroused. “It was the work of a mentally deranged person,” the Satanists tell the white grazers. If the grazers accept that, and there is every indication that they have accepted that explanation, then the Antifaers have not made a blunder and Satan will step up the bloodletting. (1)

The Las Vegas massacre represents a change in the liberals’ conduct of the war. Hitherto the liberals have been content to kill by proxy, letting the colored heathen do their killing for them. But now they have stepped forward, and we should take note of the shift in tactics, because the white techno-barbarian brings a technological mind to his killing. He can kill with a much greater efficiency than the colored heathen. But why is the liberal so impatient? After all, the extermination of the white race was proceeding at a nice steady pace. The liberal can’t wait because of his intense hatred. His hatred knows no bounds; the mere thought that there are white people still living and breathing the same air as their exalted liberal selves and the colored heathens fills the liberals with rage. They crave their bond, which is the blood of the white man.

The great advantage the Antifa liberals have over the white grazers is their passionate hatred. The grazers cannot defend themselves because they have been morally neutered; they are incapable of responding to the liberals’ hatred with a passionate hatred of their own. But isn’t it wrong to hate? No, it is not. We hate the devil and his minions, because we love Christ and His people. We must separate the hate that stems from love from the hatred that comes from vanity, envy, and pride. The man who doesn’t hate those who attack his people and blaspheme against his God is no man at all. The liberals’ hatred of the white race is grounded in their hatred of Christ. If we loved much we would hate the devil’s minions and fight them with a passionate intensity greater than the liberals’ passionate hatred. As it stands now, the white European has been enslaved by liberalism. His passivity before the enemy denotes a moral decline of epic proportions and serves as a tragic example of what happens to a man without a faith.

This New Year’s Eve will mark the second anniversary of the rape of the women of Cologne. In the aftermath of those Moslem outrages I read the commentary of a female Danish reporter who deplored the lack of manhood among the German males who stood by and did nothing to stop the outrages. She wanted to see some chivalry in the German males, but she went on to say that she did not want to return to the repressive, sexist days of yore. She just wanted to see some manhood when Moslems attacked the liberated women of the 21st century. You can’t have it both ways. Chivalry stems from a blood faith, a faith in Jesus Christ as true God and true man. It is not a faucet that can be turned off and on according to the whims of supermarket, intellectual Christians who want to pick and choose the Christian virtues that best serve their needs. That charity of honor which stems from a man’s faith in Jesus Christ was bred in the bone of our European ancestors. You cannot systematically remove that faith and replace it with a bloodless faith in a synthesis of rationalism, paganism, and Christianity and expect to see the same type of men and women who once existed in old Europe. European women no longer behave in a manner that inspires European men to be chivalrous, and European men no longer have that within which makes a man respond to the rage of the heathens with a passionate rage in defense of the innocent.

In Charles Dickens’ novel Little Dorrit, Arthur Clemens runs afoul of the Circumlocution Office when he attempts to aid Little Dorrit and her family. The Circumlocution Office is a vast bureaucratic network that tells the British people how not to do things.

Because the Circumlocution Office went on mechanically, every day, keeping this wonderful, all-sufficient wheel of statesmanship, How not to do it, in motion. Because the Circumlocution Office was down upon any ill-advised public servant who was going to do it, or who appeared to be by any surprising accident in remote danger of doing it, with a minute, and a memorandum, and a letter of instructions that extinguished him. It was this spirit of national efficiency in the Circumlocution Office that had gradually led to its having something to do with everything. Mechanicians, natural philosophers, soldiers, sailors, petitioners, memorialists, people with grievances, people who wanted to prevent grievances, people who wanted to redress grievances, jobbing people, jobbed people, people who couldn’t get rewarded for merit, and people who couldn’t get punished for demerit, were all indiscriminately tucked up under the foolscap paper of the Circumlocution Office.

Numbers of people were lost in the Circumlocution Office. Unfortunates with wrongs, or with projects for the general welfare (and they had better have had wrongs at first, than have taken that bitter English recipe for certainly getting them), who in slow lapse of time and agony had passed safely through other public departments; who, according to rule, had been bullied in this, over-reached by that, and evaded by the other; got referred at last to the Circumlocution Office, and never reappeared in the light of day. Boards sat upon them, secretaries minuted upon them, commissioners gabbled about them, clerks registered, entered, checked, and ticked them off, and they melted away. In short, all the business of the country went through the Circumlocution Office, except the business that never came out of it; and its name was Legion.

The classical liberals are one big circumlocution network set up to tell whites how not to respond to the liberals’ and colored barbarians’ hatred of the white race. They must be cautious in their rhetoric, lest they inflame the mad-dog liberal (as if a mad-dog liberal is not already inflamed), and they must never insult, accuse, or act against any barbarian of color. In short the white man must learn how not to do anything about his own destruction. He must let be.

Do pagans love their own? Yes, to a certain degree they love their own. But did the pagans love their own with the passionate intensity of the Christian Europeans? No, they did not. The mark of the European during Europe’s Christian centuries was the intensity of his love, which passed the understanding of the colored heathens. And now? The mark of the mad-dog liberal European is his hatred of his own, and the mark of the modern European everyman is his complete indifference to the rape, torture, and murder of his own people. It is intellectual Christianity that has brought Europeans to this pass. Edward Gibbon, the author of the epic historical work, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, was a convert to Roman Catholicism in his youth and then a convert to Calvinism. In both cases, his conversions were intellectual conversions. He looked at Christ with his mind’s eye, not through the eyes of his heart. And when he came to write his history of Rome, he wrote with poetical fire about the pagan faiths, but when he wrote about Christianity he sounded like an accountant reading his ledger to his employer. The Rev. H. H. Milman responded to Gibbon’s back-door assault on the Christian Europeans and their Lord and Savior.

Christianity alone receives no embellishment from the magic of Gibbon’s language; his imagination is dead to its moral dignity; it is kept down by a general tone of jealous disparagement, or neutralised by a painfully elaborate exposition of its darker and degenerate periods. There are occasions, indeed, when its manifestly beneficial influence, can compel even him, as it were, to fairness and kindle his unguarded eloquence to its usual fervor; but in general he soon relapses in to a frigid apathy; affects an ostentatiously severe impartiality; notes all the faults of Christians in every age with bitter and almost malignant sarcasm; reluctantly and with exception and reservation, admits their claim to admiration. This inextricable bias appears even to influence his manner of composition. While all the other assailants of the Roman empire, whether warlike or religious, the Goth, the Hun, the Arab, the Tartar, Alaric and Attila, Mohammed, and Zingis, and Tamerlane, are each introduced upon the scene almost with dramatic animation—their progress related in a full, complete, and unbroken narrative—the triumph of Christianity alone takes that form of a cold and critical disquisition. The successes of barbarous energy and brute force call forth all the consummate skill of composition, while the moral triumphs of Christian benevolence, the tranquil heroism of endurance, the blameless purity, the contempt of guilty fame and of honours destructive to the human race, which, had they assumed the proud name of philosophy, would have been blazoned in his brightest words, because they own religion as their principle, sink into narrow asceticism. The glories of Christianity, in short, touch on no chord in the heart of the writer; his imagination remains unkindled; his words, though they maintain their stately and measured march, have become cool, argumentative, and inanimate.

Is not Gibbon’s cynicism the essence of the liberals’’ attack on Christ and the Christ-bearing race? Let me extend Rev. Milman’s defense – It is Christ and Christ alone who can cure our moral blindness, the moral blindness that makes us indifferent to the suffering of our own people – “For judgement I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.” What is the blindness of which Christ speaks? It is the blindness of those who do not see the moral beauty of Christ’s birth, crucifixion, and resurrection from the dead. The European hearth fires of yore honored the Christ story, not as an intellectual construct, but as a living reality which animated their hearts. Classical liberalism has no answer to those who hate the white race with a passion fueled by Satan. But St. Paul does have an answer. The European men and women who circumcise their hearts will love their people in and through the Savior. That breed of Europeans, if there are any left, and that breed alone, will be able to defeat the liberals and the colored heathen. +

______________________________

(1) It matters little whether the Vegas shooter was a convert to Islam or whether he considered himself part of the Antifa movement. His inspiration was the same in either case. His heart was poisoned against the white race, because he was one of Satan’s minions. The Satanic, anti-white poison has entered the bloodstream of the anti-white liberals. Such creatures can only be conquered by white men who have hearts of flesh consecrated to our Savior, who is Christ the Lord.

Posted in Grazers, Jacobinism, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Propositional faith, Rationalism, Restoration of European civilization | Tagged | Comments Off on Armed with Cruel Hate

Mere Virtue Is Not Enough

Posted on September 30, 2017 by cwny

Edgar. Draw thy sword,
That, if my speech offend a noble heart,
Thy arm may do thee justice. Here is mine.
Behold, it is the privilege of mine honours,
My oath, and my profession. I protest-
Maugre thy strength, youth, place, and eminence,
Despite thy victor sword and fire-new fortune,
Thy valour and thy heart- thou art a traitor;
False to thy gods, thy brother, and thy father;
Conspirant ‘gainst this high illustrious prince;
And from th’ extremest upward of thy head
To the descent and dust beneath thy foot,
A most toad-spotted traitor. Say thou ‘no,’
This sword, this arm, and my best spirits are bent
To prove upon thy heart, whereto I speak,
Thou liest.          

—King Lear

__________

There are two reasons why an opponent of the Islamification of Europe and/or the negroization of America might have recourse to the language of the psychiatrist. The first reason might be that he believes in the validity of psychology. The second reason might be that he thinks if he uses the language of the enemy he will be able to convince the enemy that he is right and the enemy is wrong. In both cases the opponents of the hard left, the conservatives and the neo-pagans, are deceived in deepest consequence. If they truly believe in the devil’s science, which goes by the name of psychology, they will never defeat the devil’s minions, because at heart they are in league with them. And if they think the liberals can be won over by rational arguments derived from psychology, they are deluding themselves. Men are not moved by reason, they use reason to advance their emotional agendas, not to repudiate those agendas.

The ‘death wish’ gambit of the neos and the conservatives is a perfect example of the secularized, psychology-laden mindset of the right wing. The Germans are inviting the Moslems into their nation; therefore, they have a death wish. The Americans are allowing Mexicans and Moslems into their country, and they have turned their cities over to negro barbarians; therefore, they have a death wish. No, that is not the case. Let us try to free ourselves of the bastardized mumbo-jumbo of psychology and return to the more basic language and more profound wisdom of our nonscientific European forefathers – the liberals welcome and encourage the invasion of the European nations by the colored heathens because they hate everything connected to Christian Europe. And who is more connected to Christian Europe than white people? Even if every single white repudiates Christianity, the white race will still be hated by the liberals. They will hate the Christ-bearing race from now till the ending of the world. Nothing will change that. Will not the liberals perish as well if they continue to advocate the destruction of the white race? Of course they will. But the liberals do not believe that they shall perish. That is why we cannot simply say ‘death wish’ and think we’ve solved the problem of liberal treachery.  The liberals think they will live to be worshipped and adored by the colored heathen. Look at their fictional hero, Atticus Finch: “Stand up, your father is passing.” That is the liberal’s fantasy. Just as the Christian keeps Christ’s image before his eyes, the liberal keeps the image of himself as Atticus Finch, esteemed and respected for his sacrifice and support of the crucified black gods, before his eyes. The liberals never stop to ask themselves why the blacks hate the novel To Kill A Mockingbird. They just go on supporting their black gods and anathematizing the white ‘devils.’ Death wish? Not quite, there is something more than psychology at work. The liberals want me and thee to die for our racism, but they have no death wish. They have a life wish. They yearn for a paradisiacal life here on earth built on the blood of white racists and the dead bodies of infants tortured and murdered in their mothers’ wombs.

Why shouldn’t we use the weapons of psychology to fight the liberals? We dare not, because if we treat liberalism as a mental disorder that can be straightened out by reasoning with them and showing them the error of their ways, we will not get to the heart of the matter – we will not be able to stop the European people’s descent into hell.  Liberalism is not a mental illness, it is a spiritual disease. Are not the two things the same? No, they are not. Christ did not reason with the demons in the Gospel, He bid them leave the possessed man, and they fled into the swine and went hurtling over a cliff. We must rebuke the liberals, in the name of Christ. We cannot reason with them with the intention of converting them with our brilliance. Men and women who are possessed by the devil are not open to reason. They use their reason to advance their satanic cause, not to learn about the error of their ways. The illuminati are incapable of error – in their mind’s eye they have seen a great vision, they have seen the kingdom of Satan on earth, and they will cling to that vision while fighting with all their heart and soul to destroy that other vision, the vision of a people who made Christ their lodestar.

When you play the psychological game, you are trying to place your opponent in a rational box in order to make him easier to deal with. St. Thomas Aquinas attempted to do the same thing with God. Hamlet rejected that assault in his defiance of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, and so did Dostoyevsky’s Underground Man. Man is not a reed instrument to be played upon, nor is he a piano key. Because they treat liberalism as a psychological problem, the conservatives and the neos have failed to see the true nature of liberalism. The liberals use psychology as a forgiveness tool for themselves and their colored heathen. There is no sexual sin in psychology, so the liberals need not worry about their varied perversions. And no black man is ever responsible for his crimes; it is the racism around him that causes him to do what he does. But psychology is thrown out the window when the liberals deal with whites. Suddenly, the liberals become religious fanatics. There is no tolerance for the white racist. Liberals do not look to psychology to find a reason to excuse the white racist. Oh no! The white racist is damned. He is summoned before the liberals’ Inquisition and the verdict is always the same – guilty. In the great liberal tribunal the white man is always guilty. He cannot reason his way out of the liberals’ death sentence by pointing out, from a psychological viewpoint, the error of the liberals’ ways. ‘Guilty as charged,’ will be the response of the liberals.

If the liberals have put on the full armor of Satan, how can we defend ourselves against their onslaught? St. Paul gives us the answer: when he advises us – no, that is too tepid – he passionately urges us to put on the full armor of Christ in our war against the devil. This is a religious war we are engaged in. It is not a friendly debate. The liberals have thrown off their masks of civility and compassion and revealed themselves in all their satanic fury, just as Maleficent threw off her outward façade of a woman in order to become a dragon, but still the conservatives and the neos debate and discuss, looking for the one magic formula that will make the liberals see reason. Never, never, never will the liberals see reason. The liberals will use reason to support what they do see — they see paradise before their eyes, a paradise diametrically opposed to Christ’s divine charity, a paradise of colored heathens and sexual perverts in which human beings become an inhuman aggregate herd presided over by the archangel Satan. Have we already reached that ‘paradise’? Not quite, but we are close to it. “It will come, humanity must perforce prey on itself like monsters from the deep!”

Let us go back some 200 years to a small town in the Southern United States. And let us say that there are two speakers scheduled to debate at the town hall. They are debating whether the town should build a new building for orphans or to simply allocate enough money for repairs to the old building. The two speakers can debate that subject, because they are meeting to debate within a moral consensus of a Christian people — orphans must be provided for. In the absence of a moral consensus there can be no debate. If one speaker comes to that debate with a predetermined belief that all orphans should be killed in order to rid society of the cost of caring for them, he would be outside the moral parameters of Christendom. A Christian could not debate with him.

When I was a young man, I had a subscription to National Review. I cancelled that subscription when National Review put out a headline that read, “Abortion: A Spirited Debate.” I sent an angry letter when I cancelled the subscription, asking the editors what they were conserving if it was not Christian civilization. And what could be more basic and fundamental to a Christian civilization than the protection of life in the womb? The reply of the editors was that I shouldn’t get upset over minor issues. Enough said.

When a Tucker Carlson-type of conservative debates a feminist, a ‘black lives matter’ advocate, or a radical Moslem, he always wins the debate. He wins the debate if debates are won by who makes the best argument, but when there is no moral consensus between the debaters, the victor is always the amoral debater who understands that debates are only subterfuges for his satanic agenda. A Christian cannot debate a man or woman who wants to destroy every white Christian on the face of the earth. That is ludicrous. The classical liberals, the conservatives, are still debating — and a protest is a form of debate — with the mad-dog liberals, because they do not worship God in spirit and truth. They, unlike the mad-dog liberals, still respect the old ethos of Christian civilization. They believe in civility, compassion, and fair-mindedness, but they do not see the whole Christian vision. If they did, they would not treat Satanists as their friendly debating partners; they would see the mad-dog liberals for what they are – moral pariahs who can only be dealt with on the battlefield.

When our Lord told us to be as wise as serpents and as gentle as doves, I think he was referring to our relationships with the possessed – the liberals. They use debates and protests as subterfuges to disguise their real agenda, which is an outright war against the white, Christ-bearing race. Not so with the classical liberals. They sincerely believe that debates and protest movements are an end in and of themselves.

Edgar is at the mercy of his demonic brother when he is “so far from doing harms that he suspects none.” But when suffering deepens his vision of existence, he comes to realize that mere goodness is not enough. One must passionately hate evil and be prepared to fight evil to the death. And that is what he does, and so shall we when we see existence with the heart of the antique Europeans rather the mind of the classical liberals. And if we don’t see with their heart? Then we will debate with the liberals until they stop all debates, and we will die without ever having spent one moment in the light.+

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged | Comments Off on Mere Virtue Is Not Enough

The Liberals’ Holy Ghost

Posted on September 23, 2017 by cwny

But ‘tis strange;
And oftentimes, to win us to our harm,
The instruments of darkness tell us truths,
Win us with honest trifles to betray’s
In deepest consequence.

-Banquo in Macbeth

__________

Melville’s statement about the works of Shakespeare – “All that we seek and shun is there, man’s final lore” – was on the mark. If we shun his harsh truths we will never get to the core of his one, great, beautiful truth: Christ is “the grave where buried love doth live.” The rejection of that truth is the reason the European people are on the brink of extinction. They have allowed the devil to fool them with “honest trifles” while betraying them “in deepest consequence.” That we inhabit bodies and our bodies are subject to certain natural laws is the honest trifle the devil has used to make us discard what is of deepest consequence. We have discarded our faith in the resurrection of Jesus Christ because the resurrection from the dead is unscientific, it is against the laws of nature. And we are all part of nature, are we not? I had a secularized Jew for a teacher in one of my college literature classes. He was quite fond of attacking the notion of a loving God by pointing to all the suffering in the world. His case against God was Ivan Karamazov’s case against God. There is no rational argument against that type of attack. But there is a response, there is Alyosha’s response to Ivan. He bid his brother look to the cross of Christ.

Let’s look closer at modern atheism. Is it suffering that has turned modern man against God? If it is, then why didn’t the Europeans prior to the 20th and 21st centuries turn against God? Were not their lives just as full of suffering as the lives of the modern Europeans? And if we can believe the medical establishment, human suffering has lessened in the 20th and 21st centuries. Then we must conclude that the pain of existence is not the reason modern man has ceased to believe in the “grave where buried love doth live.” There must be another reason. The atheist, George Bernard Shaw, told us the reason in the preface of his play called Back to Methuselah – Science has triumphed over Christ. (1) The scientific world view was the sword that the liberals used to destroy the European people’s will to survive as a people. If science says that Christ be not risen, then to whom do we turn? The Europeans have returned to nature and nature’s God, the noble black savage. Rousseau was not an outright atheist, he combined his faith in Christ with his faith in the Noble Savage, but where your treasure lies so lies your heart. Rousseau’s successors kept to the heart of his new faith, which was the worship of the negro, and discarded the dross, which was Christ the Lord.

Science and truth have become synonymous in the modern era. Psychiatry is supposed to tell us more about mankind than the bards of Europe did, because psychiatry is scientific. Sociology and anthropology tell us great truths because they too are scientific disciplines, in contrast to the Gospel of Christ which stems from a primitive people who believed in myths rather than science. Science has been the bridge — the Holy Ghost — that links the Europeans to the gods of nature. The liberal taking his walk through the woods is not communing with the Christian God of his forefathers, he is communing with the gods of nature, the colored heathen, even though those ‘natural’ gods want nothing to do with nature.

In my mid-twenties I was very naïve about the Christian clergy. I thought Christian clergymen, of all denominations, believed in Jesus Christ. I vividly remember walking away, stunned, from a conversation with a Roman Catholic priest who told me that the essence of Christianity was a belief in the truths of all religions. When I asked the priest if he meant that all religions had some elements of truth, but Christianity was the one true faith, I was told that he did not mean that at all. He meant that Christianity was not true in the literal sense. And by literal sense, he meant that Christ had not risen from the dead. No man could believe something so unnatural. Now, you might say that priest was an extreme case, but I have found, over the years, that he was just a little more frank than his contemporaries. Most of the clergy have wrapped Christ in ‘this world only’ mysticism. He is a civil rights worker, He is a Marxist, He is a prophet like Mohammed, or He is the son of God just as we are all sons of God. But is He the Son of God, who rose from the dead on the third day? If He is not, then let us proceed to eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die. And isn’t that the promise of liberalism? That we can be happy in this world if we shun the unscientific Christianity of reactionaries such as St. Paul and the pre-20th century Europeans and cling to the Christ-hating, white-hating civilization of the 21st century? But can we really be happy, to the extent that anyone can be happy, in this world without our faith in the risen Lord? I’m at the age when many of my friends and relatives are suffering from terminal illnesses. For some reason, the fact that Europe is moving toward Islamification and the sacred negro has been made the lodestar of the United States does not give them any comfort in the face of death. And science? There are pain killers for the physical pain, but can science help the man or woman who has spent his or her life within the confines of the scientific worldview? No, it cannot. Such a man or woman has been deceived in deepest consequence. They are now facing death naked to the great enemy of mankind, the arch angel Satan. “Die in despair,” he tells the devotees of science on their death beds. My prayer for all my dying friends and relatives is my prayer for myself as well: “Help of the helpless, Lord, abide with me,” – and abide with them.

The fight for European culture, which cannot be divorced form the fight to preserve the European people, is the fight for our common hope. The liberals tell us we can only have hope if we abandon Christ and the European people and replace them with a Christless, colored paradise sustained by science. Our European ancestors speak to us from the grave where buried love doth live and tell us to cling to the God who sustained them in the day of battle and stood by them at their dying hour. Is it His “kingdom come on earth as it is in heaven” that we should seek, or is it the scientized, ‘natural’ hell of the liberals that we should seek?

The essentials of liberalism – that Christ be not risen, and the Europeans, who foisted the belief in Christ on the world, had to be replaced by the heathens of color, were the guiding principles of all the liberals from the second half of the 20th century to the present. But in my lifetime I have witnessed a great shift in the liberals’ tactics. When there were still a sizeable portion of European grazers who had lost the faith of their European ancestors but retained much of the ethos of that ancient faith, the liberals debated things such as abortion and race-mixing, defending such evils in the name of compassion and charity, which were virtues stemming from the faith the liberals renounced. But in recent years, now that the grazers have lost the ethos of their immediate ancestors, the 1950’s grazers, the liberals have done away with discussions. They have obtained absolute power, and they are using their power to suppress all opinions contrary to liberalism and to kill all whites who oppose liberalism. It is a brave new world we live in. It is a crueler world, a more hopeless, darker world than mankind has ever known before. In this new world we see the forces of scientized liberal atheism joining forces with the Moslems and the colored heathens to eliminate faith, hope, and charity from the face of the earth. If that military maneuver is to be successful, the European people must be eliminated. The devil understands that Christ works in human hearts. If you destroy the European people’s hearts of flesh, you have very effectively destroyed their connection to the living God.

Jacob Marley tells Scrooge of the chains he forged for himself, link by link. The European people have forged similar chains for themselves. They are chained to a pagan wheel of fire because they believe that science is truth and truth is science. And ironically the ‘facts’ of science are just as irrational as the belief in the resurrection from the dead, for it is just as impossible for a human being, mere vegetable matter according to the liberals, to become a human personality as it is for that same human personality to perish and rot in the grave. “Behold I show you a mystery.” Once we enter into the spiritual realm, and we have to if we are to explain the existence of human beings, then truth, the truth beyond reason, seems to point to the faith of our European ancestors – “though worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God… for now is Christ risen from the dead, the first fruits of them that sleep.”

Trump’s election has saved some white lives and allowed some whites to hold onto their jobs that might otherwise (had Hillary been elected) have lost them, so his election was not a complete waste. But no election within the confines of liberalism will accomplish that which is needful. The Europeans live in chains forged by the men of reason – the academics in church and state. Until those chains are broken, they will not see the one great truth that once animated the European people – the empty tomb.

I suppose I should have saved such mediations for Easter, but as the darkness of liberalism engulfs every nook and corner of what was once Christendom, the spirit reacts, in self-defense, by holding the three great events ever before his eyes – Christ’s birth in the manger, His death on the cross, and His resurrection from the dead. When the eleventh hour has passed, when the great god democracy has failed, we must look to the Help of the helpless, who broke the chains of death and rose from the tomb on the third day. +

_______________

(1) It’s worth noting that the neo-pagans and the liberals do not diverge on the third person of the liberals’ trinity. They too believe in the holy ghost of science. Nor do they diverge from their liberal cousins on the issue of the first person of the liberal trinity. They too believe in the father, which is the abstracted intellect. It is on the issue of the second person of the liberal trinity that the neo-pagans part company with the hard left. They do not believe in the liberals’ savior, the noble black savage. Can the neo-pagans compete with the hard left without a Savior? No, they cannot. But you can’t just invent a savior for practical purposes. You must see something more than nature in existence before you can do battle against an enemy who sees only the natural world presided over by the natural black savage. Christ is that ‘something more than nature.’

Posted in Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Resurrection, Scientism | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Liberals’ Holy Ghost

The Word of Their Testimony

Posted on September 16, 2017 by cwny

And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death. Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time. –Revelation 12: 10-12

__________

Our Lord told us to read the signs of the times. If we do that, if we view our times with a Christian heart, we cannot help but feel that these are the end times our Lord told us of in the Book of Revelation. But our Lord also told us that no one knows either the day or the hour. God’s timetable is not our timetable. He could end it all tomorrow, or He could extend the end times for hundreds of years. It’s difficult to imagine that modern Liberaldom, which is a synthesis of all the blasphemies known to man, will be permitted to stand much longer. But we don’t know.

If we did know the day and the hour, would that change our lives? I would stop writing articles, but other than that I don’t think I’d change much. I’d do the daily readings with my family and wait for the end. But of course one has to believe in our incarnate Lord in order to believe in the end of time. The liberals will continue on with their lives and die proclaiming the eternal greatness of fraternity, liberty, and equality. Why bother with such speculation since we cannot know the day nor the hour? I bother about such things because, although it is quite useless, even harmful, to speculate about the day and the hour – witness the Evangelical Christian Jews who try to bring about the end of the world through their support of Israel – it is essential that we read the signs of the times from a Christian perspective. If we don’t do this we will be absorbed by the times, which is to say we will become part of Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth.

One becomes absorbed by the principalities and powers of the modern world by making the external forms of Christian worship and Christian civilization the whole Christian faith, even though the inner core of the outward forms are rotten. John Donne put it quite well:

And if we distinguish not between Articles of faith & jurisdiction, but account all those super-edifications and furnitures, and ornaments which God hath afforded to his church, for the exteriour government, to be equally the Foundation itself, there can be no church; as there could be no body of a man, if it were all eye.

Church, school, and state were all good things during the Christian era of Europe, but they are not good things now that Satan has entered in. A European of depth, a man who has kept his heart, who has stayed with the Christ of the European hearth fire, will not be deceived by eternals. He will not abandon his people because church, school, and state tell him that he must worship the negro. Nor will he blend the living God with negro worship and the other heathen faiths simply because church, school, and state tell him he must. But to oppose the forces of hell that have joined together in what were formally citadels of Christian civilization, the European Christian must have some touchstone of reality other than a blind support for Christian facades that are now the habitations of the devil. Hamlet had that within which passeth show. If something within us does not burn with hatred when we come in contact with the blasphemies of our churchmen, the perversions of our academics, and the anti-white and anti-Christian tactics of our government, then we have become one with Satan. And conversely if our hearts do not burn within us, as the apostles hearts’ burned within them when they encountered Christ on the road to Emmaus, when we come into contact with the Christ of old Europe, through His people, it is a sure sign that we have become “as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.” 

A man without the poetic of old Europe in his soul is “fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils.” And is that not what has led to the demise of the European people? Our intelligentsia is divided between the far left liberals who hate the poetic of old Europe and the classical liberals (the conservatives) who have betrayed the poetic of old Europe for intellectual systems. A system does not need a people with a local habitation and a name, nor does a system need a personal God with a local habitation and a name. So the European people, the Christ-bearers, became part of a universal aggregate called ‘the people,’ and Christ became part of an intellectual system, an important part, but not as important as the system.

Systems men who worship externals without substance and have no poetic cannot defeat the men of the hard left, who have a poetic. The lefties hate the light in the name of their dark gods. The conservatives are, like Sisyphus, forever pushing the rock uphill to no avail, appealing to the hard left for justice, for a calm, rational discussion of the rightness of their cause, whether that cause is the right to life for the baby in the womb or the right to life for the white man as well as the black man. But always their assumption is that church, school, and state are full of good, rational people who are interested in compassion and justice for all. Why won’t the conservatives look to the discarded poetic of Europe? Look to the European poets during the Christian era, look to the Gospels, look to St. Paul, and look to the Book of Revelation. When they, the liberals, do such things, evils that cannot be explained by our philosophies, we must stop trying to reason with them – we must embrace the poetic of Christian Europe, which enjoins us to see evil and fight evil. And if you don’t see the evil of a society that has out-done Sodom and Gomorrah in perversion, surpassed Babel in blasphemy, and out-Heroded Herod in the slaughter of the innocents, you are either one of the hellhounds of Liberaldom, or you are a morally anesthetized conservative who sees with the exterior eye of reason while forsaking the inner eye of the heart.

From 1940 through 1953 MGM Studies sent a man named James A. Fitzpatrick around the world to film a series of short vignettes of a wide variety of countries. The short films, which are now available on DVD, were then shown in movie theaters before the main feature. I’ve only seen the ones that deal with the European nations, having no interest in the non-European countries. I should warn you that Fitzpatrick mispronounces almost all of the names of the non-English cities and towns, and he is a hopeless shill for the democratic way, but still the films make for a very fascinating view of what we have lost. The films are like (although not as well done) H. V. Morton’s In Search of… books. But there is something to be said for an actual visual depiction of the lost worlds of Europe. The intellectual rot had already set in at the universities of the various European nations (which includes all the racially European nations such as Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Canada, and the United States), but the lives of the people as depicted in the travelogues were much the same as the lives of their ancestors, hundreds of years before them. One particular vignette stands out in my mind of a small town in Holland in the early 1950’s. To think that many of the children of that town, in which the men and women wore wooden shoes and worked and worshipped as their Christian ancestors had, would still be alive today in modern Holland, is something that makes one wonder. Did any of those children stay with the vision and the way of life of their ancestors? Or did they all follow church, school, and state down the wide road to hell? It seems from a distance that the Hollanders, like the rest of the European people, followed their leaders in church, school, and state. I would like to think that there are some seventy and eighty year olds who were children at the time of that film who have stubbornly clung, in their hearts, to the old European culture of faith, hope, and charity. But is that likely? If the powers that be are rotten, will the people defy the powers that be? The poisoned Laertes cried, “The King, the King’s to blame!” I cry, “The churches, the churches are to blame!” When they peddled a Christian system that was always evolving and virtually identical to the liberalism of the ever-evolving intelligentsia, instead of preaching the never-evolving truth of Christ crucified and Christ risen, they took away the one touchstone of reality that could have given, and still can give, the European people the spiritual backbone to resist the evolution from Christian Europe to the Babylonian kingdom of Satan on earth.

All of the European travelogues give us a vivid picture of what has been lost, but I must mention two more that were particularly poignant reminders of a sacred heritage that has been replaced by the liberal techno-barbarians. In the town square of old Prague there is an astronomical clock that was constructed in 1408. Every hour on the hour lifelike models of the 12 apostles walk by as the clock strikes. On a side panel is the figure of Death. When Death’s sickle goes down, personified models of various sins, such as Greed and Avarice, fall down. It is a marvelous piece of artwork to behold — it speaks of a people whose lives, imperfect as they themselves might have been, were consecrated to our common hope.

The other vignette that I must mention is the one called “The Ugly Duckling.” In that brief film we see the birthplace of Hans Christian Andersen, and then follow him through the various cities and towns of Denmark where he lived and wrote his Christian fairy tales. The way of life of the people in those towns seems to be much the same as when Hans Christian Andersen lived there and wrote his fairy tales. What a sad, sad contrast with modern Denmark. And so it is with all the cities and towns that we see in those travelogues from the 1940s and 1950s. The intellectual attack had begun in earnest at that time, but it was not yet visible in the daily lives of the European people. It’s good to look at such films, even though they are incredibly sad, for the same reason that Puddleglum had to defy the evil queen who said there never was a Narnia. The liberals are constantly telling us that there never was a beautiful land called Christian Europe. They tell us there was only racism sexism, and homophobia in that terrible incorporate union called Christian Europe. Look and compare. Who is lying – is it the man such as myself, who sees moral beauty in old non-diverse Europe, or is it the liberals, who see nothing but evil in old Europe while telling us that the new diversified Europe is heaven on earth?

There is something very telling in St. John 12: 10-11:

“But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death; Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.”

The Jews not only wanted to put Jesus to death, they also wanted to put Lazarus to death, because he stood as a sign of contradiction to the Jews who maintained that Christ was a false prophet. So it is with the Christian Europeans. The forces of liberalism want to destroy the European people because the Christ-bearing people are a sign of contradiction to liberalism. In order to avoid the persecution of the world the Europeans have discarded Christ. But they can’t escape their destiny. They will be forever seen as the Christ-bearing people because of their past, nothing can change that. Satan won’t forgive or forget, he will always center his attack on the ‘image of God’ people, the Europeans. St. John also tells us that “among the chief rulers many believed on Him; but because of the Pharisees they did not confess Him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue:” Why should the European people, who once rejected the wisdom of the Pharisees for the foolishness of God, want to return to the modern synagogue of Satan? Is the approval of the Pharisees of Liberaldom really so wonderful? No, it is not. We ask only the benediction of our incarnate Lord whose divine love created and sustained our European civilization of long ago.+

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Halfway-house churches, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Word of Their Testimony

In the Beginning

Posted on September 9, 2017 by cwny

And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. – Revelations 19: 11-13

__________

It should be no surprise to any white man that Google is putting a stop to all dissenting voices. It is absolutely consistent with the nature of the beast called liberalism. Robespierre was an outspoken opponent of capital punishment before taking office, and he remained an outspoken opponent of capital punishment when he became head of the French Jacobin state. How did he justify the seeming contradiction between his bloodletting and his opposition to capital punishment? Was he a hypocrite? No, he was not. He was against capital punishment for human beings. The nonhuman (the aristocrats) needed to be killed so that the republic could be humanized. Once France was purged of the nonhuman element, then there would be no need for capital punishment. By the same mental process used by Robespierre, liberals, such as the Google gurus, shut off all dissenting voices while claiming to be great believers in free speech. And they are – they believe in free speech for human beings. White supremacists, which are now defined as all white people except Atticus Finch-liberals, are not human; therefore, they have no right to free speech. And it goes further than that – the nonhumans, the ‘white supremacists,’ who run the gamut from the 80 year-old lady who likes John Wayne movies to the young white man who admires Robert E. Lee, have no right to life. They must be eliminated. And they are being systematically eliminated throughout the European nations.

Throughout the Christian centuries, European religious sects such as the Puritans and the Jansenists have been suspicious of the humanity of Christ. They somehow got the notion that the majesty of God was lessened if He was presented to mankind as a humane God, but is not Christ’s divine humanity at the heart of our faith? We love Him because of His humanity, because of His death on the cross. Rationalists with Christian sympathies treat Christ’s crucifixion as one of the many possible options God could have used to reveal Himself to mankind. In fact, they suggest, at least implicitly, that the crucifixion was rather unnecessary. Was it? What is the answer to Ivan Karamazov’s tale of the little girl crying in the outhouse? There is no rational answer; there is only the cross of Christ.

There are no nonwhite liberals. The barbarians of color often vote the same as the liberals, but they do so for different reasons, and they might, when they get jobs in Liberaldom, spout liberal double-speak, but they are not liberals – they are colored heathens. The liberal is always white, because liberalism stems from Christianity, and it was only the European people who made Christianity the center of their culture and made Christ their morning star. The liberals have rejected Christ, but they have retained a perverted Christian eschatology. Humanism came from the European’s belief in Christ — to be humane was to be like unto the humane God, Jesus Christ. Now, to be truly humane a white man must be inhumane; he must hate all that was thought to be virtuous in old racist Europe. He must hate the faith, hope, and charity of the Christian Europeans, while replacing their faith, hope, and charity with a new faith, hope, and charity. Thus the liberals’ faith is in the new unholy trinity of the abstracted intellect (the father), the negro (the son), and science (the holy ghost). His hope is in utopia, the utopia of a future blessed state on earth where no white people exist. And his charity consists of the elimination of the evil ones, the white nonhumans who stand in the way of utopia. We see the liberals’ satanic version of charity in every aspect of their lives. They must ‘diversify’ everything; they must support black barbarism and the Moslem invasion of Europe, because they must be charitable; they must fight the nonhumans, the whites, and support the innocent and pure, the nonwhites. With an unholy, satanic zeal the liberals are proceeding toward a brave new world, nurtured and sustained by the sacrificial blood of white people. There was never, in pagan or Christian Europe, a white culture based on cannibalism (the Donner party was not a culture). There was not such a culture until the French Revolution, when many Jacobin women actually drank the blood of the butchered aristocrats. And now our modern Jacobins are doing likewise. They are cannibalizing the white race by proxy through the sacrificial bloodlettings of whites by their colored heathen allies.

All that was good in old Europe and the small remnant of good left in modern Europe is the result of our European ancestors’ faith in Jesus Christ. Old Europe was not the result of intellectual Christianity, it was not created by Augustine, Aquinas, or Calvin, it was created and sustained by men and women with hearts of flesh who saw life feelingly. They saw beauty on the cross, and that vision became their faith. But the devil did not see beauty on the cross. The cross of Christ, the divine condescension, filled him with loathing. So Satan prowled about the world seeking to make the European people feel the same loathing for the divine condescension as he did. The liberals are his success story. But what has he won? And what, ultimately, do liberals gain by their rejection of Christ? No man achieves a state of perpetual bliss in this world even if he is a Christian. But do the liberals seem even moderately content with their liberalism? No, they don’t. And the most radical branch of liberalism, the feminist branch (when women go to the devil they always go further than their male counterparts), seems to be composed of the most unhappy, miserable creatures that have ever walked the earth. “Unsex me here,” they cry, and as a result they all go hurtling toward the same cliff that the swine went tumbling over.

The classical liberals’ (the intellectual Christians’) response to satanic, Jacobin liberalism has been tepid. They are not comfortable with extremism, but if they were really serious about combating liberalism they would have to go to extremes; they would have to be willing to place their passionate love of Christ up against the liberals’ passionate hatred of Christ. Ah, there’s the rub. The intellectual Christians, the conservatives, have no passion because they have abandoned their racial hearth fire in order to appease the hard left liberals – “See, I am not racist, so you must let me play and work within the confines of liberalism.” But if you are not racist, if you don’t love your own, you cannot love Christ. Christ comes to us through His divine humanity, and we come to Him through our humanity. We do not become inhumane by loving our own, we become humane enough to understand the mystery and the beauty of His death on the cross.

The summation of our failure, as a people, to respond to liberalism is this – a lack of depth and a lack of passion. We lack those two essentials because of our refusal to love our racial hearth fire. No man cometh to the Father except through Christ, and no man comes to Christ except through the channel of grace, the love of our kith and kin that He has provided for us.

It’s not a little thing that Google is shutting down the white sites. It will further isolate white people from each other. Nor is it a little thing that whites are being deprived of their livelihoods for the slightest opposition to the liberal leviathan. I for one do not welcome life as a survivalist who has to “skin his own deer and run a trout line.” But it is not over for white people because of all the totalitarian clampdowns that are taking place. It is not over if we make the gospel of Christ something more than an intellectual construct. Intellectual Christianity belongs to the false messiahs of organized Judeo-Paganism; they are the connecting links to Satan’s kingdom of hell on hearth. Our salvation is in the blood, soil, and hearth fires of Europeans of depth, Europeans who were connected to Him. If we keep that connection we will not perish. If Google bans whites, the hearth-fire whites will find a way to subvert and or destroy Google. When the government cuts off the food supplies of whites, the hearth-fire whites will find ways to combat the government. There is always hope for the white man who takes His word into his heart. Such a man will love and hate with all his heart. And such a man will achieve what the rational Christian says is impossible.

It seems that as our European nations become more and more openly anti-white and anti-Christian, the conservatives have become more conciliatory toward the liberals, just as Mrs. Joe in Dicken’s Great Expectations became more conciliatory toward Orlick after Orlick assaulted her. The liberals will not be mollified. If you are white, you will ultimately be found guilty of whiteness, just as Robespierre found his closest associates guilty of aristocratic sympathies. And then he in turn faced the guillotine for his sins against the people. All whites have sinned, because they are white. It is no consolation to us to know that eventually all white liberals will die in the anti-white sacrificial fire that they started.

St. John tells us that, “In the beginning was the Word… And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.” The European people made that miracle of the Word their miracle. His grace and truth was at the heart of their culture. Yes, the liberals will take down all the monuments, and they will destroy all the art works of Christian Europe. But can they destroy the Word? They will try, but it is not possible to eradicate the Word. Bibles will still be passed around and many books stemming from the Gospel will be circulated in the Underground. In Fahrenheit 451 it was a right-wing dictatorship that burned the books. In reality, that type of totalitarianism always comes from the left. We will be in the situation of the hero of Fahrenheit 451 vis-à-vis the world. We will be trying to reconnect with our past, our Christian past, through the bards of Europe – men like Shakespeare, Dickens, and Scott.

St. Paul says, “For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” So am I persuaded that neither Satan nor the principalities of this world, principalities such as Google, will be able to separate us from the love of Christ, whom we love through the people of our racial hearth fire. It was not for vain glory or filthy lucre that our ancestors built Christian Europe. It was for the love of our common hope. Surely, if we love much, He will not forsake us – “Men must endure their going hence even as they are coming hither…” +

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Older posts (pre-April 2019), White Genocide | Tagged | Comments Off on In the Beginning

For Hearth, for Faith, for the Light of the World

Posted on September 2, 2017 by cwny

Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. – 2 Timothy 3: 7

__________

A Scottish minister recently proposed that 100,000 Islamic ‘refugees’ should be placed on the Isle of Skye, an island that only has an estimated population of 10,000 native-born Scots. In better times, say 50 years ago, the Scottish minister would have been sent to a madhouse and that would be the end of it. But nowadays such proposals are commonplace, and they usually become a reality. A man who was not tainted with the disease of liberalism might ask the Scottish minister a few questions, such as:

1) Why would a professed Christian allow 100,000 Moslems to invade his homeland? The answer would be that the Scottish minister is a ‘new’ Christian, a Judeo-pagan Christian, which means that he believes Christianity is a fusion of Judaism and all the pagan faiths. Thus, he is being true to his faith by inviting the Moslems into his nation

2) Where, Reverend Blasphemer, are you going to put the Moslems? The answer – We shall put them where the white Scots live.

3) Where will you put the Scottish people? Answer: We will dispose of the Scottish people.

4) How will the ‘new’ Scots sustain themselves? Answer: The rest of Britain will sustain them with their tax money.

5) What happens when there are no white Britons left to pay taxes to support Islamic refugees? Answer: I’m a cleric, a great thinker, I don’t bother myself with such mundane things.

And please don’t tell me, if you are not a Presbyterian, that your church is exempt from such blasphemies. This demonic madness has taken hold of all the churches in organized Christendom, which has become Satandom. The devil entered our churches in the guise of a rationalist. He seemed like a nice fellow because he was well dressed and very articulate. As time went by he seemed a bit unusual — his horns were showing. But still, he was very rational, and reason, we all knew, was next to Godliness. So the clerics got used to having the devil around them. And then they began to take his advice on everything. They wondered how they ever got along without him. Now, in the 21st century, the first of the non-Christian centuries in Europe, the devil rules.

Let us segue from the Scottish minister to the flood in Houston, Texas. White people are behaving nobly. They are giving aid and comfort to the victims of one of the worst natural disasters in this nation’s history. How can this be? Are not white people the evil ones, the people who must give way to the colored heathens? White people are allowed to be heroic during such natural disasters because the liberals have not yet discovered a way to ensure that natural disasters happen only to white people. If that were the case, all relief efforts for victims of natural disasters would be banned. They’d be banned because the defense and or the aid and succor of white people is racist and therefore damnable. The whites are only allowed to serve Liberaldom, which is committed to the destruction of the white race, so whites can only aid whites when whites are suffering through the same natural disasters as the colored heathen. When there are no whites left, the colored heathens will perish, because they are incapable of charitable outreach to their own people or any other people.

Whites will continue to serve Liberaldom, because they have no leadership willing to contradict the ruling liberal ethos, which states: “The good man is pure intellect. He is the psychiatrist, the theologian, the doctor of medicine, the doctor of philosophy, and the man of science.” But if man is pure intellect, then who is his master? It is the Archangel Satan, that great intellectual giant. Who is more intelligent than Satan? The end result of reason unfettered from the human heart is the worship of Satan. The Scottish preacher is an apostle of Satan. And so are they all – the men in authority in church and state throughout Europe. St. Paul warned us about such men:

For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. – 2 Corinthians 11: 13-15

Doesn’t that describe our modern day clergymen who have joined with their secular liberal counterparts to make war on the living God in the name of their demon gods? The flood in Texas should be combatted, but that natural disaster pales in contrast to the man-made disaster of liberalism. Who will combat the negroization and Islamization of the European nations? It isn’t just the people of Skye who are in danger of being exterminated, it is the entire white race. And they are being exterminated by “ministers of righteousness,” the righteousness of Satan. Everything is reversed in the new church – right is wrong and wrong is right.

In the plays of Shakespeare, the works of Scott, the works of Dickens, and the European fairy tales there is a reoccurring theme – the theme of a man on the periphery of great events because he is thought to be too inconsequential to have any significant influence. In other words, he is considered a simpleton. But the simpleton steps out of the shadows at a crucial point in the drama and turns the tide for the forces of good. In Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing, it is the bumbling constable, Dogberry, who brings the villains to the bar of justice, causing one of the villains to remark, “I have deceived even your very eyes. What your wisdoms could not discover, these shallow fools have brought to light…” And in King Lear it is Kent and Edgar in disguise and seemingly only minor figures who do the villains and villainesses in. Likewise in Scott’s Quentin Durward and his The Heart of Midlothian. Jeannie Deans and Quentin Durward are like unto the third dumb brothers in the fairy tales. Seemingly of no consequence, even foolish, they step forth and win the day. And Dickens? The third dumb brothers walk through his novels in a glorious quixotic parade, but none are more exemplary than Wilkins Micawber, the king of the third dumb brothers. When Uriah Heep, that evil minister of Satanic righteousness, seems like he is about to destroy Mr. Wickfield, Wilkins Micawber steps forth and produces the evidence that can convict Heep and save Mr. Wickfield. He concludes his damning indictment of Heep with the following immortal words:

I ask no more. Let it be, in justice, merely said of me, as of a gallant and eminent naval Hero, with whom I have no pretensions to cope, that what I have done, I did, in despite of mercenary and selfish objects, For England, home, and Beauty. “Remaining always, &c. &c., WILKINS MICAWBER.”

That brief montage of third dumb brothers in our literature seems like a mere bagatelle of no consequence. But that is precisely the point. Shakespeare’s plays, the novels of Scott and Dickens, and the European fairy tales are mere fairy dust in the eyes of the world. But of what does our world consist? Shakespeare, Dickens, and Scott were third dumb brothers themselves. They saw a spiritual realm inhabited by men and women with immortal souls. That made their story, the story of the European people, a story worth telling. If we have souls, if we are not just vegetable matter, what we do in this vale of tears is of eternal moment. And what we fail to do is also of eternal moment.

The Bible is shunned by some of the organized churches because they fear that it will weaken the clerics’ power over the laity. And in other organized churches the Bible has been demythologized and made into a handy dandy guide book for ‘this world only.’ But if a man goes through the Bible as if he is reading a novel or a historical work he will find something of infinite value, something that the intelligent men have yet to discover, because they have hardened their hearts against it. That something is a Man. He is the third dumb brother who breathed life into the European people. He is the heart of our hearts and the summit of all our aspirations and hopes. The new Europe, which has been forged in hell, the Europe of Satanic clergymen and fiendish hell hounds in high places, is opposed to that Man of Sorrows who was the promethean fire of the European people when they were a people.

In de la Motte Fouque’s story, Undine, he tells how the Undine acquires a soul. She acquires a soul when her heart is pierced with love and compassion for a human being. The European people have reversed the process of the Undine: they have divested themselves of their souls by denying their humanity. If this sounds too dark, or too extreme, just look at the negroization and Islamization of the European nations. People with souls, people with hearts of flesh, do not allow that to happen. When we accept the intellectual Christians’ faith in pure intellect and deny the truth that was bred in the bone of our Christian ancestors – that our racial identity is an essential part of our soul – we lose our souls and become Undines.

The Light of the World is dependent — He has willed that dependence — on His people to make his Light shine. He works through us. Satan has willed, through his people, who are the liberals and the colored heathens, the destruction of the light shining in darkness. That is what the race war is all about. Will the ancient ‘image of God in man’ culture of the antique Europeans be eradicated from the face of the earth? Or will the people who saw a great light rise up and become Europeans, the people of God, once again? It seems ludicrous to even suggest that the Europeans will not be completely destroyed when you look at the naked horror of Liberaldom. Everything stemming from old Europe is proscribed. And what used to be the unspoken, underlying passion behind all the liberal clergymen’s and academics’ sermons and lectures, the destruction of the white race, is openly preached in the pulpits, taught in the classrooms and shouted from the rooftops of Liberaldom. What can be done in the face of such a monolith of evil? The European people should become like unto the third dumb brothers of European fairyland. With absolutely nothing but our faith in the Man of Sorrows we should step out of the shadows and fight for our racial hearth fire. Are we likely to succeed? No, we are not. But whether we win or lose in the temporal realm, we will have achieved a great victory, we will have reclaimed our souls. God’s people will once again be able to say that they have seen a great light. How can we be Europeans, how can we be men, without the light that shineth in darkness? +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Fairy tale mode of understanding, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Third Dumb Brother | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on For Hearth, for Faith, for the Light of the World

The Devils of Liberaldom

Posted on August 26, 2017 by cwny

And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way. And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time? And there was a good way off from them an herd of many swine feeding. So the devils besought him, saying, If thou cast us out, suffer us to go away into the herd of swine. And he said unto them, Go. And when they were come out, they went into the herd of swine: and, behold, the whole herd of swine ran violently down a steep place into the sea, and perished in the waters. Matthew 8: 28-32

__________

Trump is hated by the hard left because he is not proceeding according to the ‘Some are more equal’ doctrine of the Jacobin-Marxist left. And he is ‘disappointing’ classical liberals such as Ann Coulter and Ann Corcoran because he is not doing what they think is necessary to ‘restore’ our American republic. But the classical liberals do not understand what is going on. What they call the democratic process is an invention of the devil. Our nation was conceived by men determined to destroy the image of God in man, and was allowed to spread its Satanism through the world by classical liberals (now called conservatives) who thought that men only needed an abstract God that could be pulled out of a God-box on holidays and other special occasions, and then put back in the box during regular working days, because the classical liberals hold that it is self-evident that rational men can work things out for themselves without reference to a fairy-tale God.

Trump will never set the American republic right within the confines of democracy, because democracy is from the devil. But Trump has done much – he has slowed down the liberal juggernaut. Who else could have done that? Certainly not Romney, Bush, or Ann Coulter and Co.? And he has made it possible, by bringing all the liberals out of their lairs to spew their venom at him, for all those who have not been morally anesthetized to see the liberals for what they are – the spawns of Satan. Now, most Europeans have been morally anesthetized so they cannot see the liberals for what they are, but is that Trump’s fault?

The Christian Europeans have been completely routed by the liberals. They are fleeing the battlefield in disarray with a relentless enemy on their trail. Trump has volunteered to offer his services as a rear guard to cut down on the causalities. It ill behooves us to criticize anything he does, because whatever he does it is more than anybody else has offered to do for the European people. If we had a non-satanic government, if liberals were not spawns of Satan, we could write editorials and books in which we disagreed with Trump and told him he should do this rather than that. But this is war. Stop treating the rear guard as a failed general and commend him for his efforts. There can be no victory in rearguard actions, but we can take advantage of them to go home, lick our wounds, and prepare for another assault on the enemy. Actually, in the case of the modern Europeans, we have to say, ‘Prepare for a first assault,’ because they have not yet begun to fight.

Trump’s inauguration speech in which he said that we have one heart, one home, and one glorious destiny set him apart from the antique Europeans such as myself. But it placed him well within the confines of classical liberalism. Why then do the classical liberals dislike Trump more than I do? It is because the conservative-liberals think politics, like religion, is an abstract theory. They do not believe that there is anything in politics or religion that cannot be explained by a rational process. So whenever anyone, regardless of the fact that he is one of their own, goes against their abstract theories they attack him. From my standpoint, Trump belongs with Andrew Jackson and Teddy Roosevelt. They were men with a terribly flawed universalist ideal, but they had a remnant of white pietas. Which is not good enough to win a war, but it deserves to be acknowledged and respected when all the other classical liberals are completely devoid of white pietas. Of what does that remnant of pietas consist? On one issue, that of economic nationalism, Jackson, T. Roosevelt, and Trump broke ranks with the classical liberals. Jackson attacked the national bank, and T. Roosevelt broke the trusts. And now Trump is challenging North Korea and China, which makes the corporate socialists hysterical. Trump has infuriated the hard left for not honoring the ‘more equal’ doctrine, and he has infuriated the conservatives for not honoring the one world, one economy doctrine of classical liberalism. And if Trump is hated for opposing only one aspect of liberalism, then what must their hatred be for a Christian European who opposes them in everything?

And this brings us to the real issue. The Trump-Brexit battles are skirmishes within Liberaldom. The real war is between those who adhere to Christian Europe and those who have chosen to align themselves with Liberaldom. On the one side, the liberal side, is the hard left, the classical liberals (conservatives), the alternative right, and organized Christian Jewry. On the right is – is there a Christian European right wing? Not at present. Most Europeans were once Christian and they were right wing – they wanted to preserve their people and the institutions that stemmed from their faith in Jesus Christ. But classical liberalism, which was created by Satan, allowed the European people to slide into liberalism. Hawthorne’s Mr. Smooth-it-away (see Hell on Earth) is the classical liberal. Without directly challenging Jesus Christ, classical liberalism subverts Him by making Him subordinate to a rational process of their own devising. The process varies, which is why there are so many contending factions within Liberaldom, but it is always the process that men must adhere to; it is not the living God.

If faith consists of an adherence to an intellectual formula and not to a God who enters human hearts, then you can defend the Faith by defending an intellectual process while abandoning the people who took God into their hearts. ‘He isn’t there,’ the great intellectual Christians tell us, ‘He exists in our minds. If you trust us, we will bring you safely home.’ Of course the home that the classical liberals are taking us to is the same home that the hard left liberals are going to – it is called hell.

Burke pointed out that the French clergy, who were more concerned about their process than a man’s faith in Christ, helped pave the way for the French Revolution. Dostoyevsky made the same point 100 years later when his Grand Inquisitor accuses Christ of thinking too much of man. Man, the Grand Inquisitor insists, does not want to struggle toward the light by following the way of the cross, he wants to exchange the cross for earthly guarantees of bread and security. Will this always be the case with the European people? Will they always prefer the faith of the clerical Grand Inquisitors to faith in Christ? It seems so. But it was not always thus. The early European Christians did not shun the cross of Christ, they were like unto Thomas Nelson Page’s depiction of the heroic Goth:

On the instant stood revealed, as though he had blown down the ages, a pure Goth, unchanged in any essential since his fathers had left their forests and through all obstacles, even through ranks of Roman legionaries, sword in hand had hewn their way straight to the goal of their desires. He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart—a Goth.

-Thomas Nelson Page in Under the Crust

What happened to us? A hard stone can become a smooth pebble over time if a steady stream of water runs over it. For years our clergymen poured rationalist pap over the faithful until their souls were smoothed away. They are now reasonable human beings incapable of loving or hating with all their heart, but quite capable of following the injunctions of the clerical wise men who enjoin them, in the name of a rationalist God, to go beyond love and hate to…? To what? Paradise? Or is it to hell?

The hard left is incapable of love, but they can still hate, which is why they always defeat the classical liberals. Kipling wrote, wistfully, of the time when “The English begin to hate.” Would that were true of the white, Christian Europeans: To hate the devil and all his works. Are not the liberals and the colored heathen the work of the devil? Of course they are, but the classical liberal does not believe in the devil. He believes in reason. But our Lord did believe in the devil, and He enjoined us to fight the devil. When did rational men decide that Christ was a bad theologian?

I constantly hear classical liberals asking, when they look at what the radical left is doing, ‘What is going on — how can they do these things?’ If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride. I wish that the conservative-liberals would take the story of the demon-possessed swine seriously. It’s a curious thing: the best of our poets have a very immoderate, extreme view of life that is in line with the Gospels while the literary critics and theologians always seek to modify or condemn such ‘extremism.’ Thus, Burke is seen as ‘obsessive’ for saying that the French Revolution was from the devil. And poets such as Shakespeare, Scott, and Dostoyevsky are considered extreme and or fantastical when they take the devil seriously. But whose vision fits the reality of the world we see before us? Do we live in the classical liberals’ world of reasonable men working out their problems within some mind-forged, man-made process? Or are the Christian poets’ right – do we live in a world in which men and women, inspired by Satan, seek to strike God by destroying his image in man? The Satanism of modern Liberaldom and the insufficiency of reason to deal with that Satanism was brought home to me in my early twenties when I was involved in what was called the ‘pro-life’ movement. While passing out literature at malls and doing sidewalk protests out the abortion clinics, I came to realize the terrible insufficiency of the ‘Give them the information about the unborn children’ approach. That was not the issue; the women getting abortions knew what they were doing. They were acting according to the will of a spirit who was opposed to Christ’s reign of charity; they were acting according to the dictates of the evil one, who prowls about the world seeking the ruin of souls.

Christian Europe was not lacking in heroic men and women who dedicated their lives to the resistance of the evil one and the support of His reign of charity. Today we have no heroes willing to oppose Satan and support Christ. Why? Once Christendom became Satandom through the mediation of the ‘smooth it away’ rationalists in the church, the men and women of Europe had no star to guide them. Human beings respond to their leaders. When the European leadership bent their knees to Christ so did the European people. Heroism became commonplace, because the European everyman did not have to have exceptional vision; his vision was bred in the bone – it was part and parcel of his everyday life. But once the Christian leadership of a society is replaced by Satan’s minions, Christian heroism becomes very rare. There are still brave men and women, but lacking a moral vision they put themselves at the service of Satan. Nothing is more pathetic than the ‘support our troops’ occasions which take place on a regular basis. Support our troops? To do what? Are they going to place a Christian king on the throne? And shouldn’t we support our local police? Again, I must ask – why should we support our police? If I shoot an abortionist, will the police come to my aid? If I organize a vigilante committee to take care of the marauding bands of colored heathens, will the police come to my aid or will they come to the aid of the colored heathens? People, in the main, will reserve their heroism for respectable, state-approved heroism. When a nation state has a satanic government, your “heroes” will be heroes of Satandom.

What has been lost? A culture in which even the worst of sinners knew who was the cornerstone of their world. And the best of that culture were heroes who fought the heathens and supported His reign of charity. Once lost, can such a world be regained? Not from within Satandom. If we are true to our origins, if we don’t look to classical liberalism as an antidote to Jacobin liberalism, we will find the strength and the will to endure to the end in spite of the liberal armies that are arrayed against us. That is the promise of Europe’s morning star:

Men’s hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. – Luke 21: 26-28 +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Democracy, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged | Comments Off on The Devils of Liberaldom

The End of Classical Liberalism

Posted on August 19, 2017 by cwny

Humanity must perforce prey on itself,
Like monsters of the deep.

–King Lear

__________

Let us begin with Burke:

Men are rarely without some sympathy in the sufferings of others; but in the immense and diversified mass of human misery, which may be pitied, but cannot be relieved, in the gross, the mind must make a choice. Our sympathy is always more forcibly attracted towards the misfortunes of certain persons, and in certain descriptions: and this sympathetic attraction discovers, beyond a possibility of mistake, our mental affinities, and elective affections. –Letters on a Regicide Peace

My sympathy is with the young man who was attacked by the left-wing Satanists. Whether his counterattack was in self-defense – the Marxists were throwing bricks – or whether the young man was launching a punitive strike against the liberals – they have been killing whites through their colored henchmen for over fifty years – the attack was completely justified. It is regrettable that he only killed one of the liberal protestors. And it is tragic that he will be prosecuted for murder, when he should be awarded a medal for courage under fire. As for the police officers? It is regrettable that they chose to serve the Satanic government of the United States of America instead of their own people. They are to blame for their own deaths, not the white nationalist protestors.

What do we make of the white “Christian” clergymen who vehemently denounced the white nationalist protestors? We should call them what they are – they are Judases, one and all. What are they defending? They are defending the incarnation of Satan within the heart of what was formerly Christian Europe. There are no words harsh enough to describe them.  No atrocities committed against whites are ever condemned; they treat the perpetrators of the atrocities with “loving forgiveness.” But there cannot be and there must not be any mercy extended to the whites who try to defend themselves against the liberal/colored barbarian onslaught. “Your children, your wives, and your people all must be sacrificed to the great gods of color.” So say our Judeo-Pagan clergymen. Do such creatures really speak for Christ? No, they do not. They speak for Satan.

When the alternative right first emerged on the Internet, I read a number of their writings and was saddened by the content. I was saddened because they were not attacking Liberaldom in the name of Christ, they were attacking Liberaldom in the name of paganism, which placed them solidly within the confines of liberalism. They opposed the new-age liberals as Hitler opposed communism – they were the nationalist lefties vs. the universalist lefties. Their movement must turn toward Christ if it is to have any hope of surviving and thriving. There is no sustaining faith in a mere reaction to the insolent, hate-filled system of the liberals. We need to see the Cross of Christ over Europe once again, not the various banners of the white pagans.

I once followed a young man who had all sorts of Nazi and neo-pagan bumper stickers on his truck. When he pulled into the super-market parking lot, I got out of my car and approached him. In a non-confrontational manner I asked him about his beliefs. Not surprisingly he had no beliefs that dove-tailed with the antique Europeans. He hated liberals, he hated Jews, and he hated Christians. I endeavored to point out to him that Christianity was not compatible with liberalism or Judaism, but he was not to be ‘taken in.’ I felt like I was talking to the dwarfs from C.S. Lewis’s The Last Battle:

“That’s right,” said the other Dwarfs. “We’re on our own now. No more Aslan, no more Kings, no more silly stories about other worlds. The Dwarfs are for the Dwarfs.”

There you have it. When will this terrible separation between the neo-pagan and his Christian ancestors end? Never? Or will the alternative right convert at the last trump (no pun intended)? They, the alternative right, have some good instincts: they hate the mad-dog liberal branch of Liberaldom, but they also hate our people, the men and women of Christian Europe. Maybe if we, the European Christians, stay faithful to our Lord and our people, some members of the alternative right might find their true home with the Christ of old Europe.

We have already, off this stage, established that there are no European conservatives; there are no Burkean conservatives who want to conserve the European people and their Christian civilization. The new conservatives are liberals. And their far-left cousins are the hard left, or if you prefer, the Marxists. The hard left have a tried and true battle plan that always defeats the milk-toast conservatives. Whenever they kill whites, they immediately blame the whites for bringing their own deaths upon themselves. “They were racist, therefore they deserved to die,” is the constant refrain of the hard left. Whenever, which is very seldom, the whites fight back and kill a colored heathen or a member of the Jacobin hard left, the Jacobins demand the heads of the white defenders, apologies from every “conservative” white, and more draconian laws designed to speed up the destruction of the white race. They always get what they demand, because the conservative whites are not conservative; they believe in the same liberal gods as the hard left. Their differences with the hard left are procedural, not religious.

If the conservatives were not of Liberaldom, if they were Christians opposed to the reign of Satan, they would not apologize to the liberals when a white man rises up against the liberal leviathan; they would tell the Jacobins that more violence was on the way and then act on their threat. That is what it will take for white people to halt the extermination process. The liberals preach, “By whatever means necessary.” The whites’ response must be, “By whatever means necessary, within the boundaries of Christian chivalry. And the defense of one’s kith and kin is within those boundaries.” (1)

The recent protests in Charlottesville highlighted the futility of white protest. When you protest, you must ask yourself to whom you are protesting. Are the powers that be likely to be receptive to your protest or are they going to use the protest to identify their enemies and take action against them? You know, or at least you should know by now, that liberal governments view any protest against their Jacobin governments as opportunities to crush their enemies. They videotape the protests and then either jail the protestors or find means to deprive them of their livelihood. (2) Does this mean that whites should give up? No, it means whites should change tactics. They should eschew public non-violent protests in preference for quiet, secretive, punitive raids. Peaceful protests are part of the democratic process. When the democratic process has become a totalitarian process, you can’t accomplish anything by protests. Witness the failure of the pro-life movement.

Whites will not meet the Jacobin’s violence with a violence of their own, because they have allowed the hard left to set the terms of engagement. These are the terms: “You, the white man, must never preach or practice violence against the Jacobin elite, because we are the true liberals, we are the arbiters of what is right and what is wrong.” And even when the conservatives accept those terms — actually it is because the conservatives accept those terms — the hard left continues to destroy them by any means necessary.

What we are witnessing in this assault, which well may be the final assault of the hard left against the white race, is the death of classical liberalism. The Tucker Carlsons and the Paul Joseph Watsons completely refute the hard left’s stances on every issue under the sun. But that does not make any difference to the lefties. They are not moved by reason. What will move them? Nothing. The young man with the truck is on the right track. The Jacobins will not be swayed by appeals to reason or appeals to charity. It should be done unto them as they are doing unto the white race.

Dostoyevsky’s Underground Man knew the deficiency of classical liberalism. ‘Suppose you build your perfect world in a glass palace and I come along and smash it just because I want to smash it?’ Classical liberalism presupposes that we are all reasonable people who can sit around and reason out our problems. The classical liberal gives a nod to Christianity as a religion, but he downplays the ‘irrational’ message at the heart of Christianity. He, like the medieval scholastic who spawned rationalism, does not think reason is tainted with original sin. How could it be, when it can do such wonderful things? We need to turn to the Gospels, to St. Paul, Shakespeare, Dostoyevsky, and the European fairy tales as an antidote to classical liberalism. It is there that we find depth. We find God, the devil, and “unaccommodated man” struggling against all the forces of hell, armed only with his vision of the Man of Sorrows to sustain him.

In most of the 20th century dystopian novels ( Kipling’s story and Orwell’s novels excepted), the authors depict right-wing totalitarian governments that enslave mankind. But it was Kipling and Orwell who got it right. There has never, in the history of European man, been a crueler, all-encompassing, totalitarian control of mankind than the Jacobin’s control of the European people. Through the use of vast technological communication networks such as Google, the left has built a monopoly on thought. They exercise a mind-control more powerful than anything conceived by the fiction writers. With machine-like precision, the mills of Jacobin liberalism grind human souls into nothingness, and there seems to be no force on earth that can stop the great liberal machine.

Rapunzel’s tears restored her lover’s sight. Christ’s divine charity restored the sight of fallen man. It is in humanity, in the charity that is contained in the blood of our Savior and the compassionate tears of our loved ones, that we will find the strength to destroy the great liberal machine that bestrides the world like a mechanical Colossus of Rhodes. There is indeed providence in the fall of a sparrow. We don’t know how such things can be, but we know, through the faith that stems from love, that the great liberal world, the world of the Google monster, feminist harpies, colored heathens, and Jacobin diabolists will fall. It will fall when we believe what St. Paul believed – that “the foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of men.”

What is the foolishness of God? Those men on the Titanic who went to their deaths singing “Nearer My God to Thee” knew what the foolishness of God was. It was and is the Cross of Christ. It is only possible to believeth all things and hopeth all things if you possess the charity of honor that our European ancestors believed to be the all-in-all of existence. Burke wielded the sword of charity against the French Jacobins, and we should wield that same sword against the modern Jacobins. The moral beauty of Jesus Christ’s quixotic death on the cross inspired our European ancestors to love and hate with all their heart. They loved Christ and hated the devil. When we do likewise, forsaking the tepid waters of classical liberalism for the tempest-tossed waters of passion, a passion connected to His passion, we will not be borne down by the tidal wave of liberalism. We will rise again as a people, just as Christ rose again on the third day. +

__________________

(1) The liberals have a great advantage over the Christian Europeans in that their master, who is Satan, proscribes no boundaries. He has no honor, and he encourages his subjects to spit on all honor codes that stem from Christian Europe. Thus the liberal will fight without honor and extend no mercy to his white victims. The Christian European must fight with that charity of honor, which is a practical disadvantage. But that disadvantage is offset by the passionate intensity that is gained by an adherence to His code of honor.

(2) Many men have lost their jobs as a result of their participation in the Charlottesville protests. No protestor from the left lost his or her job. Only the white protestors lost their jobs. This is the same thing that happens in France, Germany, Britain, and every other European nation when whites try to seek redemption from the devil.

Posted in Antique Christianity, Christian counter-attack, Europeans and Christ, Jacobinism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The End of Classical Liberalism

The European Heart Renewed

Posted on August 12, 2017 by cwny

O here, where late our little city stood,
And now this desolation darkens us,
Friends, with a rapid hand and heart renewed,
Building, once more uprear we root and tower,
And make ourselves a realm.

-George Francis Savage-Armstrong

__________

The essential thing that Burke wanted his countrymen and all of Europe to understand about the French Revolution was that it was something entirely different than a European palace revolution. It was not a replacement of one Christian king for another Christian king, it was the enthronement of a new religion, a satanic religion, in what had once been a Christian nation. The forces of irreligion were always present in every European nation, but they were not embodied in an organized government until the French Revolution. Robespierre’s death did not halt the Jacobin revolution; it spread throughout Europe, and eventually every nation of Europe adopted the anti-Christian system of government of the French Jacobins. Until we do what the Europeans of Burke’s day failed to do – kill the Jacobin dragon – we will continue to live in the hell of religious and racial diversity.

Jacobinism is paganism writ large. Through the use of our natural reason we come to a belief in nature and nature’s god. The Israelites were Jacobins before the Jacobins when they returned to Baal while Moses went up to the mountain to speak with God. Every revolt against the living God is a return to paganism. Does man have a stronger inclination to rebel against God than to seek God? It certainly seems so. But we shouldn’t go with the Puritans who claimed that a sinful defiance of God is the all in all of man. There is the Europeans’ struggle as a people. Even if we must concede that their history is largely like the history of the Hebrew people, a history of a flight from God, we must, if we are seeking the truth, see that there was a genuine yearning for the living God, for Jesus Christ, in the hearts of the European people. We cannot sit in our study with our scholarly tomes and say there can never be such a thing as a Christian people while we have proof to the contrary staring us in the face when we look at the European people and take them for all in all.

Ironically it was the missionary efforts toward the non-white people of the world that ushered in the demise of Christian Europe. The European missionaries set out to Christianize the colored races, but the colored races ended up paganizing the white race. The negroization and the Islamization of the un-United States of America and Europe is the result of the implantation of the natural, rational religion of the Jacobins through the medium of the natural colored races. When the missionaries came to evangelize the coloreds, they found that the colored people had gods, they were not atheists. So they sought to emphasize the similarities between Christianity and the heathen faiths, thus blurring distinction between the religion of Jesus Christ and the religion of Satan. God did not say, “Do not be an atheist,” He said, “Thou shall have no other gods before me.” Solomon didn’t ruin the Israelites because he denounced God, he ruined the Israelites because he built temples to the heathen gods as well as the one true God. So it was with the European missionaries. They became the European conduits to paganism, because they failed to keep the distinctiveness of the religion that made the Suffering Servant its cornerstone before their eyes. They lost the vision of Christ in the mire of the natural religions. Today we have been entirely engulfed by the heathen faiths, and no one from the ranks of the Christian clergy will speak out against them, because to do so would indicate that the anti-heathen was a racist and therefore damned. “For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.” Once the “Christian” clergy made racial diversity their top priority, they were consumed by the liberal leviathan. If your message is a mere echo of liberalism, why do you need to exist at all? The churches are now just an ‘Amen chorus’ for the rulers of Liberaldom. “Diversity is Godly, the colored masses are the people,” the liberals proclaim. “Amen,” respond the church men.

The liberals have a symbiotic relationship with the colored heathens. They, the liberals, need the colored heathens in order to return to paganism. Why can’t they make that transition on their own? They must have conduits to paganism because when a European rejects Christ, he has placed himself into a state of non-being. He has forsaken his God, and now he is alone in the universe. Twentieth century art, when it is not a paean to the gods of color, is an ode to nothingness. That is the key. An apostate European must cling to some God to keep him from the void, so he goes whoring after the heathen gods of color. Do those gods sustain him? The drug and alcohol-related deaths and the increasing suicide rate among white people indicates that the gods of diversity cannot sustain the European people. But still, they must have gods, so they will cling to them to the last gasp.

Do the colored heathens need white liberals? They might say they do not need white people, but they do need them. They need them as a predatory animal needs his prey. If there were no white people, upon whom would the colored heathen prey? Each other? Certainly, but there is not much to prey upon in the black and brown civilizations. Once the whites have done their jobs, once they have self-destructed, what will become of the colored heathens? They will have no worshipful whites to sustain them, and they will prey upon each other until they all perish.

The conservatives in church and state have not been able to conserve Christian Europe, because they failed to take into account the human factor. Which is truly astonishing and unforgivable considering that they claimed, at least intellectually, to believe in a God who became man. But if you view man as intellect alone, you will not know man nor will you know the God-Man. Man is deeper than his intellect. He has a heart that is capable, when it is stirred, of seeing more than mere reason can comprehend. T. S. Eliot, in his book on Christian culture makes a rational case for the necessity of a religiously based culture. But his rational case is worthless without that which must precede reason – faith in Jesus Christ. And how does one obtain faith? St. Paul tells us that “faith worketh by love.” And that brings us back to our mysterious human relationships, to our ties to our kith and kin. It is now a given in Churchianity that blood ties are antithetical to faith. That is a lie, a lie that is used to cover up the Europeans’ flight from God. Chateaubriand is right: man is much more tainted with the sins of the intellect than with sins stemming from the heart. The intellectual man seeks to avoid the passionate God of love, because passion is painful. And the way to avoid the passionate God is to avoid all things human – to avoid all ties to your family and your race. Thus white pietas, which leads to the love of the European Christ, is regarded as sinful, and the worship of the colored heathen and the hatred of the white race becomes the creed of the new fusionist Christian of the 21st century.

In the best of his mystery novels, The House of the Arrow, A. E. W. Mason’s protagonist, the detective Hanaud, asks who will speak for the woman who has been murdered. Who cares enough about her to hunt down the murderer? The answer is that he, Hanaud, cares, and he will hunt down the murderer:

“But—you will pardon me—I am not thinking of you”—and there was so much quietude and gravity in the detective’s voice that his words, harsh though they were, carried with them no offense. “No, I am thinking of a woman more than double the age of either of you, whose unhappy life came to an end here on the night of the 27th of April. I am remembering two photographs which you, Mademoiselle Harlowe, showed me this morning—I am moved by them. Yes, that is the truth.”

He closed his eyes as if he saw those two portraits with their dreadful contrast impressed upon his eyelids. “I am her advocate,” he cried aloud in a stirring voice. “The tragic woman, I stand for her! If she was done to death, I mean to know and I mean to punish!”

Our people have been murdered and no one cares about avenging their murder, because church and state have decreed that they were not murdered, they were legally executed for crimes against the religion of nature. They were racists, sexists, and non-intellectual Christians, which meant that they were against the fusionist Christianity of the intellectual Christians. But no matter what the powers of this world say against them, I do not see criminals when I look at the antique Europeans. I see men and women to whom I owe a debt that can never be repaid. They loved much, and as a result they were bound to Him in faith. “Bear but a touch of my hand, there,” pointing to his heart, says the Ghost of Christmas Past. And then Scrooge is able to see the past in a new light, in the light of Christ. When we touch their hearts, we touch, through them, the heart of the living God. We should never leave them, we should never seek to make peace with their murderers. Who will stand for them? I will. If you stand with the antique Europeans against the principalities and powers of Liberaldom, you will be condemned as they were condemned. In that condemnation we hear the same voices that condemned our Lord. Can’t we, through our fidelity to Christian Europe, say, “Yes, I know that Man!” +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Defense of the White Race, Jacobinism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on The European Heart Renewed

The Horror and Blasphemy of Liberalism

Posted on August 5, 2017 by cwny

O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. – Luke 13: 34-35

__________

Recently a friend asked me what I thought of the Adamite theory, which, according to my friend, is the theory that it is only white people who are direct descendants of Adam. The rest of mankind are non-Adamites, who are… I’m not quite clear who they are. And the reason I’m not clear on that point is because I never could plow my way through the various books on the subject. But I bring up the Adamite subject to come to the main point of conflict between a European Christian and the modern liberals, both secular and clerical: To me, as a European Christian, it seems obvious that there has only been one Christian people and that is the European people. There is such a difference between the people of old Europe and the people of the non-white cultures that it lends credence to the Adamite theorists. But it is not necessary to accept that theory in order to acknowledge that the living God was at the center of non-diverse, white Europe, and He was not at the center of colored heathendom nor is He at the center of modern Liberaldom.

Our Lord says, in St. John, chapter 15, verse 26, “But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the father, even the spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me.” Why are the intellectual Christians who worship the negro not interested in the truth? Have they rejected the Comforter? It seems that they have. And without the Holy Ghost how can we know Christ? We must not rely on our abstract reason to guide us through life rather than the Holy Ghost. Our reason will always lead us away from the truth and toward the father of all lies. Look what has happened to European people once they made abstract reason their father, science their Holy Ghost, and the negro their Son of God. What then was my response to the question about the Adamites? I told my friend that all I know is that I see the face of Jesus Christ in old Europe. I do not see His face in modern Europe nor in the people of color at any time in their histories.

There is no mercy, no charity, no love, and no honor in the modern world, because the European intelligentsia in church and state persist in deifying the heathens of color while demonizing the antique Europeans. I don’t need to believe that the European people are the only descendants of Adam or the true Hebrews to know that they are the Christ-bearing people. I know they are the Christ-bearing people, because of the moral beauty of the culture they created in the name of Christ the Lord. Neither historical research, church documents, nor the Bible itself will convince the willfully blind, those who reject the spirit of truth, that the European Christ is the living God. Maybe that is why our Lord said that blasphemy against the Holy Ghost would not be forgiven. If we forsake the comforter we have forsaken Christ.

The creation of Christian Europe was something that St. Augustine said could never happen. There was the city of God, which was the organized church, and there was the city of man, which was the European people. In St. Augustine’s mind, the people, those who believed in Christ, could never be the true church. But he was wrong. The organization, the system, what Augustine called the City of God, can never be the true Church. Tennyson got it right:

Our little systems have their day;
They have their day and cease to be;
They are but broken lights of thee,
And thou, O Lord, art more than they.

Is He more than they? Is He more than the organized Christian Jewry of the Roman Catholic Church and its auxiliary Protestant branches? Yes, He is more than they. The Christian churches have gone over to the pagan faiths – they have made Islam and negro worship part of the Christian faith. And by doing so they have made it clear that they have sided with the enemy of mankind against Christ’s church, which consists of all those who have circumcised their hearts so that they can “receive Him still.” The 20th century existentialists such as Camus, Sartre, and Beckett proclaimed that, “God is dead.” But it was not the living God who died, it was a man-made system that died. The computer print-out God who was the product of the computations of great minds — that god died. But the Son of God? He still lives and He shall still be living after the new church of Islam and the negro has had its day. It only remains to be seen whether there will be any hearts of flesh left on earth, hearts that still adhere to His word. “When the Son of Man returns will He find faith on earth?”

It doesn’t appear that Christ will find faith on earth when He returns, but the age of prophecy is over; we do not know with any certainty that the European people will remain adamantly opposed to the Light of the World. We do know that the modern Europeans have left Christian Europe behind. The liberals show their hatred of Christ by their hatred of all things stemming from old Europe, and the grazers show their indifference to Christ by their complete indifference to incarnate Europe. The Europeans’ descent into hell has been a terrible thing to witness. And they seem determined to continue their descent until they reach the bottom-most level where they will embrace the devil in all his satanic glory. Will they feel any revulsion? No, I don’t think a feminist or a mad-dog liberal who takes such pleasure in our modern hell on earth can feel uncomfortable with the devil. Such individuals will have gotten what they set out to find, a world of darkness, devoid of light. And the grazers? Will their spiritually dead nerve endings suddenly revive at the sight of the devil? Will they cry out to the God of Mercy whom they ignored during their lives? I don’t know, but I do know that He will extend mercy to anyone who calls on Him by name. But can a man call on Him by name if He has rejected the Holy Ghost?

It is unfortunate that Christian mysticism has become a specialized study of Gnosticized Europeans who bid us look to a seven-point plan that we use to reach a higher level of mystical contemplation. Christian mysticism should not imitate the contemplative systems of the Asians. True Christian mysticism is unique, it is the better way that St. Paul describes in 1 Corinthians 13. It is charity, the charity that is at the center of old Europe, which inspired our greatest poets, artists, and musicians, and it is what our people saw, even if they only saw it through a glass darkly, as the mystical heart of existence. The European people rejected the esoteric systems of the pagans for the divine charity of Jesus Christ. His charity was greater than the magic of paganism.

I believe it was Blake who said that if mankind did not have the religion of Jesus Christ, they would have the religion of the devil. The modern European people are not unbelievers; they believe in the gods of Liberaldom. And belief in those gods precludes a belief in the God whose divine charity redeemed the world. We can’t get to Him by way of any system conceived by man. In point of fact, all our systems, which have their day, take us to hell. But we can get to Him through charity, the charity that is born and nurtured at our racial hearth fire.

Diversity is spiritual death, it destroys the image of God in man. The push toward diversity, which means the destruction of the white race, is the liberals’ religion. They must join, body and soul, with the colored races in order to eradicate the living God from the face of the earth. The mask is off. If the European people had not been morally anesthetized, they would not be able to look on modern Europe without a horror too deep for words. Conrad’s Kurtz said, “The Horror, the Horror.” What Kurtz saw was nothing compared to the Horror of modern Liberaldom, for modern liberalism is the continual reenactment of the crucifixion of Christ. (1) Everything stemming from Christian Europe is demonized, and every white European, even if they denounce Christ and most particularly if they do not denounce Christ, is crucified. That is a horror beyond horror, because it is the incarnation of Satan over the ruins of Christian Europe.

 What is to be done then? Our Lord tells us to, “seek and ye shall find.” But what should we seek? Should we seek the wisdom that comes from special revelations of the blessed mother? Should we seek knowledge of the end times by parsing the Book of Revelation and merging Christianity with Judaism? Or should we seek the wisdom of liberalism and blend Christ with Islam and the negro? Almighty God, forbid it! There is a magic talisman, but it is not esoteric wisdom. It is to be found in charity. The men with hearts of flesh will find the one true God at their racial hearth fire where that charity of honor is born and nurtured. All other ways to God end in ruin. Look at the ‘conservative’ Joe Scarborough, who started his political career as an intellectual conservative, a man who wanted to conserve systems rather than his people. He ended up a mad-dog liberal who divorced his lawful wife in order to marry a feminist from hell. And then there is Francis Schaeffer. He was a great intellectual Christian, but he refused to defend the Christ of the European hearth fire, thus opening the way for a diverse God who gave his blessing to modernity. Schaeffer’s son Franky went from intellectual Christianity to mad-dog liberalism. And from that Olympian height he apologized to the feminist Rachel Maddow for the sins of his father. Every denial of the essential truth that was at the center of old Europe – that Christ entered into the heart and soul of the European people – is an assault on His reign of charity in the name of the evil one. So long as we are too worldly wise and too fearful of the racist label to ask Christ, the Christ of old Europe, to abide with us by our racial hearth fire, we will continue to be ruled by liberals and colored heathens who have no mercy. The former have renounced the God of mercy and the latter never knew Him. +


__________________________________

(1) Kurtz looked into his soul and saw the evil that he, as a man, was capable of. But Marlow, Conrad’s alter ego, said that it was something to have judged. Kurtz was a moral pariah, but he could still see the evil within his soul and call it evil. The liberal looks into his satanic soul and sees sanctity. He is incapable of recognizing evil as evil. And that is a descent into the deepest pit of hell. The liberals have done it! They have become like unto Satan himself. The horror, the horror.

Posted in Charity, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Horror and Blasphemy of Liberalism