Against Principalities and Powers

Posted on November 17, 2012 by cwny

Ah, why should wrath be mute and fury dumb?
I am no baby, I, that with base prayers
I should repent the evils I have done.
Ten thousand worse than ever yet I did
Would I perform if I might have my will.
If one good deed in all my life I did,
I do repent it from my very soul.

– Aaron the Moor

__________

It occurred to me while watching the liberals exult over the re-election of The Obama that here in America we have become the complete inverse of Christian Europe. The American republic is truly Satandom. An old Christian hymn describes Christians thronged around the Savior’s throne. On the night of Obama’ re-election we saw the spawns of Satan thronged around their little anointed black devil. And unfortunately the other European nations are rushing to become more American, which translates to more satanic. They too want to become the inverse of Christian Europe. When I was a young man, I had a hard time reconciling a belief in hell with a belief in a loving Savior. But as I got older and met more liberals up close and personal, I began to understand about hell. Christ cannot force our love. There are those so obdurate in their hatred of the light that God must reluctantly let them go where their hatred drives them to go. Will the liberals be happy once they get to hell? I doubt it, because they are not happy with the hell they have created here on earth. I know they exult over satanic triumphs like the re-election of Obama, but after their celebration they will go back to their sterile, empty, anesthetized lives and hate each other as much as they hate white, Christian Europeans. “See how they love one another,” was said of the early Christians. My observations of the liberals reveal the inverse: “See how they hate one another.” Do I pity them? Not while they are in power. I reserve my pity for my people who the liberals are attacking with the relentless fury of Satan, their master. When the liberals are locked up where they can’t do any more harm, then I will pity them and attempt to ease their self-induced suffering, but until that time it would be inhumane to show sympathy to the devil’s own who are persecuting my people.

This brings me to the victims of liberalism, the hated and vilified white people without whom there can be no civilization worthy of the name civilization. But first let me distinguish between depressed and profoundly depressed. The Obama re-election was depressing to me as candid photos of a fat man at a family reunion would be to the fat man. “I know I’m fat; do you have to shove a picture in my face to emphasize it?” I know I live in negro-worshipping Liberaldom, but I don’t like to see vivid, obscene pictures of it. The profoundly depressed white people are more like people who thought they were in relative good health and then found out they had a terminal cancer. These people are in desperate need of consolation, and we live in Liberaldom where there is no consolation for suffering. Of course Christ is the hope of the hopeless, but who among us does not need human conduits to Christ? The great achievement – great in the satanic sense – of American liberals is that they have cut off all human conduits to God. The seventy-year-old woman who doesn’t want to leave her house anymore because she might meet someone who voted for Obama, the mid-fiftyish women who thought that God simply wouldn’t permit our nation to slide that far down the slippery slope, the young white male who wants to get a gun and start shooting liberals, the old man who yearns for an apocalyptic end of the world are all emblematic of the profound depression that has beset decent white people in the wake of the Obama victory. Can I, or any other antique European, be of some help to these suffering white people? Unfortunately not, because with the exception of the young white male, who I may be some comfort to, the decent whites are the prisoners of the liberal clergy. If I tell the catechism-Aquinas-pope-loving Catholic or the Bible-alone-without-any-human-conduit Protestant that there is strength and comfort in the European tradition and men such as Burke, who said, “If we do not hate where we should hate we will not love where we should love,” and men such as Kipling — “When the Saxon began to hate”  — they will simply stare vacantly and say that it is wrong to hate; their clergymen told them so. What can be done with such people? Prior to Obama’s re-election, I would have said nothing could be done with such people. But I have noticed a slight change. The same people who twenty years ago dismissed the notion that liberals were spawns of Satan who worshipped the negro are now open to the idea. The unadulterated liberal sewage that is spilling out everywhere has had its effect. Whites who never said a bad word about negroes or liberals are now thinking, albeit with some lingering feelings of guilt, bad thoughts about negroes, Mexicans, and liberals. The thought is father to the deed, so let us fan those thoughts into a fire. (1)

The fact that the liberals no longer care to sanitize their sewage shows us just how confident they are of their invulnerability. And for a time the liberals might seem invincible, but liberalism depends on institutionalized superficiality in order to survive. Liberals won’t be able to keep every single European on their superficial level. When white men with European hearts start to fight for the deeply held faith of their European ancestors, Liberaldom will crumble. But we shouldn’t wait for a majority of whites to agree with us before we act. That type of thinking belongs to the defeatist conservatives of the failed democratic era. In the new European era, which is really a return to an older era, the ethos of fairyland will prevail over the ethos of the democratic era. In the fairy tales, the hero ventures forth without a majority coalition and without consulting an expert in theology. And when he drives his sword through the heart of the evil entity, be it witch, dragon, wizard, or liberal, his people who seemed dead are restored to life. Just as Christ rose from the dead so can a hero consecrated to Christ reanimate his people who languish in a liberal-induced, deathlike sleep. The essential thing is to be an integral European, who has severed his ties to everything modern and liberal. Such a man will be truly free; he will be the master of his arm and the scourge of Liberaldom.

Mortals are not meant to be continually happy. This world is indeed a vale of tears. But we are not meant to be so profoundly depressed that we feel bereft of all spiritual sustenance. And that is the depression engendered by the triumph of Liberalism; white Europeans feel bereft of everything that makes life in this world bearable. Our love of the hearth fire where kith and kin dwell keeps us connected to the living God. This is why the attack on the Europeans’ whiteness has been so unrelenting and vile. Within our racial home is our kith and kin – destroy that home and you destroy the Europeans’ link to God. Liberals have replaced the European hearth with a satanic cauldron. They severed their connection to Christ in order to be connected, through negro worship, to Satan. The profound depression of the Europeans who do not want to be connected to Satan through Obama, is that they have been forbidden by their clergy to take sustenance from their racial hearth fire. So what is their plight? They are wanderers on the face of the earth. They can’t fully accept the satanic reign of the negro-worshipping liberals, but they have no place to call home.

Come December a remnant band of Europeans will celebrate the birth of the God-man Jesus Christ, who took flesh and dwelt among us. But His birth is now viewed by liberals as significant and important only because it was an event that prepared the way for the worship of the negro, whose deification will be solemnized and celebrated on Jan. 20, not just by liberals in America but also by liberals throughout the European world. It’s not possible to avoid this stark and somber reality. The Man of Sorrows has been given a subordinate position to the gods of color. The liberals have institutionalized the worship of Baal. At the inaugural ball the modern Europeans will dance around the black idol Obama as the ancient Hebrews danced around their image of Baal. This celebration of all that is unholy should fill the Europeans with something akin to anger, only much greater than anger. It should, but it doesn’t. Will there ever be a time when the persecuted white men will rise up and strike down the liberals and their colored gods? It doesn’t seem possible at this moment in history, but history is full of surprises. The life of the spirit cannot be put in a rationalist box forever. There is no telling how many people might follow a remnant band of Europeans whose anger is beyond anger and whose ties to their race and the God of their race are indestructible.

For centuries European liberals have tried to condemn Christianity by presenting a certain type of Christian Phariseeism, depicted by Scott in Old Mortality, François Mauriac in Woman of the Pharisees, and Hawthorne in The Scarlet Letter as the real Christianity. They told us that they were the cure for such an unholy religion. But look at what they have given us: a satanic liberal Phariseeism that makes the older Christian Pharisees look gentle and benevolent in comparison. The liberals, in the name of their black gods, condemn the white race to eternal damnation. Nothing the white man can do will change the fact that he is, in the liberals’ theology, irredeemable. And nothing the black god does can be wrong because he is god and what he does is always good. There is no goodness outside god, so when the black god kills, rapes, and pillages, then murder, rape, and pillaging are good. What about mercy, justice, and charity? Those concepts are alien to the black gods, so they must come from the white devils, which means they must be banished from the earth. “There shall be no justice, no mercy, and no charity in the new Babylon.”

St. John gives us the hope to persevere in the face of the liberals’ unholy crusade to destroy the white race. The Christian European living in Liberaldom is every bit the exile that St. John was on the island of Patmos. St. John conveys to us, the European remnant, the orders of our Lord and Savior, we are called upon to be steadfast: “To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.” If we are content to sit at the foot of the throne of Satan’s anointed one we are not listening to what the spirit hath said unto the churches. Christ, not The Obama, is the Europeans’ bright and morning star. The profound depression of white people who did not vote for the Obama stems from their feeling of hopelessness in the midst of Liberaldom. But an internal vow to refuse to render homage to the heathen gods of Liberaldom is a life-giving and life-sustaining vow that will have a ripple effect throughout the mystical body of the church. The race war is a religious war. Once the white man sees that reality he will become a whole man again and he will gird up his loins and fight and conquer the principalities and powers of Liberaldom. +

__________________________

(1) Immediately after Obama’s re-election while the liberals were exulting, I heard some very impolitic and correct responses from the usually timid white people who did not vote for the Obama. But then they talked to their clergymen, and they calmed down. “Mustn’t be a fanatic,” “Let’s agree to differ; we are all God’s people,” blah blah blah. The tiny fire in their hearts was quickly squelched. Some day whites will proceed with the counter-revolution without the blessing of their clergymen.>

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Halfway-house churches, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Tagged | Comments Off on Against Principalities and Powers

To This Battlefield

Posted on November 10, 2012 by cwny

If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. –St. Paul

__________

I have a cousin who is in despair over the Obama victory. His reaction – “It’s the end of everything” – is probably indicative of the reactions of many white people. I sympathize with my cousin and others like him. Obama’s victory is quite depressing. But would a Romney victory have reversed the colored tide that is sweeping over our country and turned Liberaldom back into Christendom? Hardly. Admittedly the defeat of Obama would have provided a momentary thrill, such as Donald Duck gets when he temporarily wins out over the chipmunks before his eventual defeat, but the negro-worshipping liberals would have still been in power during a Romney administration. We should use this election as a General uses his scouts during a war. We have found out some information about the enemy. The states with the smallest number of negroes that went for Obama, such as Maine and Vermont, have the highest concentrations of mad-dog liberals. This confirms previous information given to us by Edmund Burke and Anthony Jacob: liberalism is a disease caused by an abstraction from reality. Those whites who are the furthest removed from the real negro are the most likely to worship the noble savage negro. The old Civil War battle lines are still in place; southern whites who actually know blacks did not vote for The Obama. 

My cousin’s despair is the result of his listening to the irresponsible 11th hour harangues of democracy-loving conservatives. For the past sixty years or so we have had to listen to conservatives telling us that, “The hour is late, this is our last chance, we must elect ­____ or we will perish.” When a conservative bids us pin all our hopes on an election, what happens when that election is lost? Do we just curse God and die? We do if we follow the logic of the 11th hour conservatives. But the conservatives never follow their own logic. After losing an election they immediately start preparing for the next election. Even before Romney had officially lost, I heard two Fox news commentators asking themselves how Republicans could begin to get the Hispanic vote. Will the conservatives never learn? They are suffering from a spiritual malaise. They have made a god out of the democratic process. If all hope for a renewal of the European people depends on the Europeans’ ability to blend into a non-European democracy of races, then the European people are indeed doomed, because there is no hope for the European within the perimeters of democracy. But outside those perimeters is hope abundant. How many electoral defeats must take place before the white man breaks the chains of democracy? 

When my prayers are not answered, I get angry with God. When the anger subsides I realize I have no right to be angry with God. “He knows,” as the poetess tells us, and I do not know. One needs to place one’s hand in the hand of God, which is often easier said than done. But in our better moments, in those white moments of the soul, we see with blinding sight, and we do place our hand in the hand of God, not because we ought to do it, but because we love and trust Him. I think the European’s infatuation with the democratic heresy stems from a shift in his attitude towards God. As a defense against the God who does not answer prayers to his satisfaction, the European has turned to the democratic version of the Watchmaker God. The Watchmaker God makes the world, winds it up in order to set it in motion, and then steps back, completely indifferent to the fate of the human beings who inhabit the Watchmaker’s world. The 17th century rationalists such as Voltaire were not the inventors of the Watchmaker God. The Sadducees and the Pharisees, and later St. Thomas Aquinas, all championed a theology in which a distant God set the world in motion and then stepped aside and let mortals fend for themselves. It’s a theology that allows a man to keep God as an idea while dispensing with Him when dealing with the nitty-gritty of practical, down-to-earth living in this world. 

The seemingly great advantage of the Watchmaker system is that it puts a man in control of his own destiny and puts God in heaven, looking down on mortals and bestowing His blessing on their marvelous systems and then disappearing into the clouds until He is needed to bestow His blessing on a new, improved man-made system. Grace does not flow from God to man in the Watchmaker system, it flows from the system to man. And over time the system becomes all and all to man, while God becomes less and less, and even disappears altogether from some systems, such as the Communist system. 

The great disadvantage of the Watchmaker system is that it cuts a man off from the living God and places him in the hands of a false god who will eventually fail him, as the great god democracy has failed the 11th hour conservative. Such a man now has no faith left from which to launch an attack on his enemies. His god, democracy, has left him naked to his enemies. Too many false Aslans render a man incapable of believing in the real Aslan. 

It should be pointed out that the majority of white people in this country did not vote for The Obama. A significant minority did vote for him along with an overwhelming majority of colored people. What does that tell us? The barbarian hordes of color are the eternal enemies of white Europeans, and a large minority of white Europeans are irredeemable liberals who can only be dealt with on the battlefield; there can be no peaceful coexistence with such creatures. What about the majority of whites who did not vote for The Obama? Let me bring in one lone white man to stand in for those whites: In a small grocery store that I frequent there is a white man in his fifties who I’ve become quite chummy with over the last two years of shopping at his store. But it was only a few months ago that we got beyond small talk. He mentioned that one of his sons was about to become an eagle scout. He sounded a little tentative, worried that I might disapprove, so I told him that I thought the Boy Scouts organization should be applauded for their refusal to admit homosexuals. Upon hearing my opinion on homosexuals and the Boy Scouts, the mild-mannered grocer opened up on a whole host of topics. He desperately wanted The Obama to lose in order to “show our kids that America is still decent.” He also, regretfully, felt he had to couch his criticisms of The Obama with the usual apology: “I’m not racist, I just don’t like his policies.” Mr. Grocer would run a mile from me and possibly report me to the police if I told him my views on race, but I love the man; he is a white man. I wish he would realize, as I wish all such white men would realize, that his innate decency is unique to the white European and that it comes from the living God, not from the American way or the democratic process. But there it is. Our people will not fight outside the perimeters of democracy, so we must fight for them. 

During the months preceding the election when some polls showed Romney leading, there were some not so veiled threats from liberals and blacks that they would not remain non-violent if The Obama lost the election. Those threats place me beyond ordinary anger, they fill me with an eternal fire of anger that can never be put out. Is there one single liberal or black barbarian who fears the wrath of the white man now that the Obama has won? No, there isn’t. The liberals and his colored allies must be made to fear the angry white man who will not sit back and passively accept his own and his peoples’ execution simply because of an election. “If democracy is harmful to the white man, democracy should die so that the white man can live,” should be the battle cry of the unadulterated and unmodernized white man. We cannot remain democratically non-violent in the face of this unrelenting war of extermination against our people. A young white male of my acquaintance told me that Obama’s re-election made him want to go out and mow down as many liberals as possible. The sentiment does him credit. But I advised him not to waste his anger on indiscriminate violence. Be violent and bloody, yes, but let it count for something. If we take the democratic blinders from our hearts, God will tell us when and how to strike out against the liberals and their colored minions. We should never eschew violence nor should we make it a cure-all. There are many ways to destroy liberals so long as we break with democracy. The important thing is to take the democratic blinders off and let the grace of God do its work. 

There is a creeping, crawling creature that we should specifically address in the wake of The Obama’s reelection. This creature tells us that, “White people are decadent, the colored races will renew the Christian faith with their purity of soul and their natural and vital natures.” If that is the case, how does Mr. “Sell Out My Own People” account for the fact that the majority of whites did not vote for The Obama, while the vast majority — 93% — of the natural, saint-like, colored tribesmen did vote for The Obama? Renewal will never come from the colored races, it will come from within the European people once they have cast off the creeping, crawling creatures and their mad-dog liberal brethren. 

The only drama of any importance on the world stage is the drama of the European and his relationship with his God. All other non-European dramas only take on significance when they become part of the European drama. In theme and purpose the Europeans’ journey mirrors the ancient Hebrews’ journey. There are times when the European people reach out and touch the hand of God as depicted by Michelangelo on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. And there are times when the Europeans turn from God and plunge themselves and the rest of the world into darkness. At such times the devil rejoices and walks the earth with impunity. Obviously we are living in such times. Is The Obama the Anti-Christ and are these the end times? That’s more than I know or anybody else knows. Would it make any difference if we did know? We are supposed to hate the devil and all his works. And negro-worshipping Liberaldom is clearly the work of the devil, so whether these are the end times and Obama is the anti-Christ or whether these are not the end times and Obama is just a nondescript little weasel, should not matter to us. Either way the Christ-bearing people must fight Satan and his minions. What is needful — and events like the re-election of the Obama keep us mindful of such things — is that we hold ourselves in a state of permanent warfare with the liberals and their colored allies. They love the devil and all his works, while we belong to the devil’s antagonist, the Man of Sorrows. There shall always be a great divide between us, in this world and the next. Who among us would wish it otherwise? 

Some savvy political thinkers on the right tell me that the Obama victory will be good for white people because it will “wake them up” and make them vote for a real white candidate next election. I’m not that savvy; I’m a peasant at heart. All I see is that a white man with at least a modicum of the old Christian ethos in his soul lost an important election to a black weasel, who has become the sign and symbol of the liberals’ satanic reign. That cannot be a good thing. But it should not be a reason for despair, because the true European does not place his hopes in the democratic process. The light of the world did not come into the world to make it safe for democracy. I place my hopes in the European hearth presided over by the King of Kings. +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Democracy, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged | Comments Off on To This Battlefield

Reclaiming Our Spiritual Stronghold

Posted on November 3, 2012 by cwny

I am dreaming of the mountains of my home,
Of the mountains where in childhood I would roam.
I have dwelt ‘neath summer skies,
Where the summer never dies,
But my heart is in the mountains of my home.

I can see the little homestead on the hill;
I can hear the magic music of the rill;
There is nothing to compare,
With the love that once was there,
In that lonely little homestead on the hill.

I can see the quiet churchyard down below,
Where the mountain breezes wander to and fro,
And when God my soul will keep,
It is there I want to sleep,
With those dear old folks that loved me long ago.

– W S Gwynne Williams

__________

If ever a man was thrown to the wolves it was “Vinegar Joe” Stilwell, the U. S. general who was given the task of getting the Chinese troops during World War II in fighting shape to take on the Japanese. But Chiang Kai-shek did not want his troops to fight the Japanese. He wanted to keep his troops in reserve for the upcoming civil war with Mao Tse Tung and the communists. “Why can’t we just use American air power without using Chinese troops?” Chiang Kai-shek asked. Stilwell’s reply was that you could never, unless you simply wanted to bomb a nation into oblivion, dispense with your infantry, because it was the infantry that occupied the enemies’ territory. From their territorial strongholds, they launched their attacks from air, sea, and land. If you occupied the enemies’ territory, you took away their source of strength. Of course we know the final result. Vinegar Joe never got the cooperation of Chiang Kai-shek and Chiang Kai-shek’s refusal to give Stilwell enough troops to establish a stronghold against the Japanese was the reason for Chiang Kai-shek’s ultimate defeat in the civil war with the communists. Mao did establish strongholds against the Japanese and he used those strongholds after the war to launch his attacks against Chiang Kai-shek. 

Is there a moral here? I think so. Our race is our spiritual stronghold. Within that stronghold are the mysterious human relationships that give us the wherewithal to fight the battle against principalities and powers. If you strip a man of his racial identity, you strip him of his soul. How can a man without a soul fight the good fight? He can’t; he can only surrender to the devil and his minions. 

For over sixty years now there has been an unrelenting demand that the white man should give up his spiritual stronghold, his race, and melt into a soulless blob called humanity. And it is not just secular liberals who make such a demand, it is also the Christian clergy. They too demand that the white man renounce any special ties he might have to the white race. The ideological underpinning for the liberals’ and the clerics’ demand that the white man renounce his race are contradictory.

On the one hand the white man is told he must renounce his race because the white man’s past history shows that he is irredeemable. He has done nothing but evil in the past, and he will do nothing but evil in the future, should he be allowed to live into the future. His only hope for salvation is to worship the black man with all his heart, mind, and soul, and hope that the black man will have mercy on his poor benighted soul. Which, by the way, is a forlorn hope because the black man, unbeknownst to the liberals, is not really a god, nor does he have any concept of mercy.  On the other hand is the contradiction. The white man is told by the liberals and the clerics that there is no such thing as race. Skin color has nothing to do with a man’s soul. “We are all, under the skin, the same.” Then by what right does the dynamic duo of liberals and clergy prattle on about the sanctity of the negro god and the evil of the white man? If there is no such thing as race, then there should be no such thing as negro worship, and there should be no such thing as the demonization of the white man. “We are all just human beings and we are all just wonderful.” But the liberals and their clerical brethren are playing both ends against the middle. The white man is an evil bogeyman and the black man is a benevolent god when the liberals and the clerics are eating their Manichean Cheerios, and the white man is part of a multi-colored blob when the dynamic liberal duo are in the mood to “teach the world to sing in perfect harmony.” 

We’ve all had those Introductory Philosophy courses in which a smart aleck professor proves, by geometric logic, that we don’t really exist. The liberals have been giving a similar introductory course on Race, in which they prove that our whiteness is not part of our soul. Our response to the liberals, and – lest we forget them – the white-hating clergymen, should be passionate rage. Our race contains all that we value most: our kith, our kin, and our God. If we don’t believe that the spirit can become incarnate in a people, what happens to our faith in Christ? Our faith in our Creator is inseparable from our faith in our identity as a particular people of a determinate race. Why should we ever question that our whiteness is part of our soul? Our ancestors believed it to be true, and we know, in the deepest recesses of our heart, that it is true. Even the liberal knows, in some tiny corner of his wizened heart, that skin color is more than mere biology, which is why he feels the necessity to fight “racism.” He doesn’t want a resurgence of the white Europeans because he doesn’t want Christ to rule in his liberal, multiracial utopia. The race war is the European’s ultimate challenge. If he allows his whiteness to be demonized or harmonized into nothingness, he will be a man without a soul. 

There is a direct correlation between the Europeans’ declining faith in the major tenets of Christianity and their declining faith in their distinctiveness as a race. How could it be otherwise? If Christ did not become man, and if He did not rise from the dead, it follows that human beings are mere biological entities without an animating spirit within them. What need is there then, to make distinctions between biological entities? 

The Christian churches still stand, but they have made a pact with the devil. The devil put a scholar’s cap over his horns and a scientist’s lab coat over his body and walked in unmolested through the church door. And in the form of a scientist he is deferred to on every issue. Christ’s resurrection from the dead has become “problematic,” our own bodily resurrection through Christ has become a “quaint” notion, and the re-paganization of existence that Julian the Apostate dreamt of has taken place. The techno-barbarian white has joined with the black barbarian to build a world devoid of light. The unbought grace of life, nurtured in the small units of grace – our families and our people – has been destroyed. We have no spiritual stronghold, having allowed The Enemy to sever our ties to our own people. What is left to us? How should we then live? We should take back that which is ours. We can start the counter-revolution by refusing to accept demonization and by refusing to be harmonized into nothingness. 

There is no one in the upcoming Presidential election who represents white people. Romney is the “let’s liquidate the European people at a slower rate” candidate, and as such I will vote for him. But there is something else at stake in the election. A Romney victory will indicate that a significant amount of white people are sick to death of being demonized. Now, being tired of the racist label is not the same thing as embracing the racist label, which is the point we want all white people to come to, but it will be significant if large numbers of whites ignore the liberals’ racist charge and vote white. My own informal surveys tell me, and I trust my informal polls more than the official polls, that true believers in the sacred negro are to be found in the universities and in their adjuncts, the churches and the media outlets. But the white hoi polloi have no great love for the negro. Unfortunately they have no great love for their own people either. They are lost souls; having been robbed of their identity, they are a seething cauldron of resentment. And they do resent being called racists when they are, unfortunately, not racist. They will root for white sports heroes or black sports heroes. But of course that’s not good enough for the liberals. They want all white athletes to disappear, leaving only a pantheon of black athletes to be petted and adored. 

Nothing is written, our wills are free. We can utterly destroy ourselves if we want to, and that seems to be the course white people have chosen. However, there is such a thing as the grace of God. We seem so far from His grace at this point in our history, because we have cut ourselves off from the channels of grace, our kith and kin. But who can say what miracles might occur if just a few whites would seek His grace through the racial stronghold of the soul? It all sounds too fairy tale-ish? Yes, it does, but the entire history of the European people reads like a fairy tale to me, a really true fairy tale where the Hero fights His way right to the gates of hell, defeats the devil, and leads His people up from hell to that dear, dear land called Christian Europe. 

The white man is still a long way from returning to his racial stronghold, which provides him with protection from the slings and arrows of the liberal and his colored allies. But there is a certain racial fatigue that is taking place in the white man. The liberals are far from infallible. They have played the race card so often that even the self-effacing, long suffering white everyman has grown disgusted. The hideous Bob Dylan asked, “How many years must a people exist before they’re allowed to be free?” We must ask, “How many times can you demonize my people before I become a Goth again?” The brain fever hasn’t left the white man; he still won’t banish the colored hordes from his homeland, but a certain disgust with the endless charges of racism might be the beginning of something wonderful, the end of negro-worshipping Liberaldom. I love the image of the melting snow in C. S. Lewis’s book The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. The first blade of grass that comes out from under the snow is significant; it means a thaw is beginning that will eventually result in the downfall of the wicked witch. Let us cherish every blade of grass that brings us one step closer to His green and pleasant Europe and one step further away from the liberals’ Babylonian kingdom of hell on earth. 

The European people can no longer see God clearly because they have lost their spiritual stronghold, their race. When they regain that stronghold, they will be able to see through that dark glass to the Light of the world. “The people that have walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined.”+

God Knows

I said to the man who stood at the gate of the year,
‘Give me a light that I may tread safely into the unknown.’
And he replied:
‘Go into the darkness and put your hand into the hand of God. That shall be to you better than light and safer than a known way.’
So I went forth, and finding the Hand of God, trod gladly into the night. And He led me towards the hills and the breaking of day in the lone East.

So heart be still:
What need our little life,
Our human life to know,
If God hath comprehension?
In all the dizzy strife
Of things both high and low,
God hideth His intention.
God knows. His will
Is best. The stretch of years
Which wind ahead, so dim
To our imperfect vision,
Are clear to God. Our fears
Are premature; In Him,
All time hath full provision.
Then rest: until
God moves to lift the veil
From our impatient eyes,
When, as the sweeter features
Of Life’s stern face we hail,
Fair beyond all surmise
God’s thought around His creatures
Our minds shall fill.

– Minnie Louise Haskins

Posted in Defense of the White Race, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on Reclaiming Our Spiritual Stronghold

My People

Posted on October 27, 2012 by cwny

When the  tempest ‘s at the loudest,
On its gale the eagle rides;
When the ocean rolls the proudest,
Through the foam the sea-bird glides–
All the rage of wind and sea
Is subdued by constancy.

-Scott

__________

I recently read about the white bus driver in Kansas City who was sucker punched by a black ‘youth’ for no other reason than the fact that he was white.  And the liberals’ reaction? The bus driver’s whiteness was a provocation to the black youth whose people had been “brought over to this country in chains.” The story brought back memories of a similar incident some 35 years ago. I was taking a class at the local university with a very liberal professor (aren’t they all) who had never actually known any blacks ‘up close and personal.’ His had been a sheltered life in that regard. This sheltered liberal decided that he was going to get in touch with ‘the people,’ so he sold his car and began to take public transportation to and from the University. One day, while using public transportation, a large negro punched the mild-mannered professor in the stomach while screaming, “My people were brought over here in chains!” And much to the liberal professor’s horror, none of his liberal colleagues at the University were outraged at what he thought was an outrage. “You must understand their rage,” and “You shouldn’t condemn a whole race” – he hadn’t condemned a whole race – “for one bad apple.” Now, the liberal professor did not become a born-again white man in the twinkling of an eye, but that incident, along with his close-up observances of negroes at work and play, did turn a very liberal professor into a white man who believed in segregation and white self-defense. Unfortunately, such conversions are rare.

Most liberals cling to their faith in their negro gods no matter what the cost. Chris “The Tingler” Matthews is always a useful example. After the negro-instituted hell in the New Orleans Superdome, the Tingler was outraged, but not by the black murderers and rapists. He was outraged by whites in the neighboring towns who defended their lives and property with loaded shotguns. From the Tingler’s standpoint the whites who defended themselves against the black savages were blasphemers; they dared to defy the Tingler’s black gods.

Of course the professor punched in the stomach, the bus driver sucker-punched in the face, and the bloody black atrocities in the New Orleans Superdome can all be excused, and they are excused, with the usual liberal blather: “They are just isolated incidents,” or, “You must understand their rage.” But the non-liberal white knows the incidents are not isolated incidents; they are small samples of the ongoing war, aided and abetted by the liberals, of the black against the white. It’s a particularly gruesome war because whites seem unwilling to defend themselves; hence, the war is more a series of massacres than a series of battles. But why won’t the white man defend himself against the onslaught of the colored barbarians? Why does the white man lack the self-preservation instinct that all other races seem to possess? The neo-pagans tell us it is because Christianity destroys a man’s instinct to defend his race. But if that was so, the Christians of the South during the 1800’s would have simply surrendered to the North. Instead we saw in those Christians, before and after the war, an unprecedented example of a people determined to preserve their race:

It is charged that the written law is not always fully and freely observed at the South in matters relating to the exercise of the elective franchise. The defence is not so much a denial of the charge as it is a confession and avoidance. To the accusation it is replied that the written law, when subverted at all, is so subverted only in obedience to a higher law founded on the instinct of self-protection and self-preservation.

Those sentiments, expressed by America’s most Southern and most Christian writer, Thomas Nelson Page, were the sentiments of the white Christian people of the south. So the preservation of one’s race is absolutely in keeping with the highest tenets of the Christian faith. We must look elsewhere to find the reason for the white man’s suicidal rush for the abyss.

The ‘elsewhere’ lies in the great temptation that Satan offered to Adam and Eve. He made fun of their provincialism and tempted them to renounce their ties to a personal God for an abstract knowledge of the workings of impersonal nature. Throughout the white man’s history, which is the only history that need concern us, the conflict has been one of provincialism vs. universalism. When universalism holds sway the people lose contact with the living God and go whoring after nature gods of their own devising. The Sophoclean, provincial element of the Greek culture was reaching out to a personal God above the gods, but the natural, cosmic, universal faith of Socrates and Plato defeated the movement toward a personal God above nature. Likewise the ancient Hebrews. When they returned to Baal and the other universalist gods of nature, they lost contact with the true God.

The first European Christians were devotees of the hero-gods of the North such as Woden and Thor. Their heroes were racial heroes, men like Siegfried and Beowulf. Their conversion to Christianity was not forced on them at sword point; they saw, in Christ, a God who was superior to their gods by virtue of His divine charity, and they saw in Christ’s humanity a hero God who was more humane than their heroes.

The Nordic religion was not a religion of dread, or of magic formularies to propitiate hostile powers. Instead of covering its temples with frescoes of the tortures of the damned, it taught people not to be afraid of death. Its ideal was the fellowship of the hero with the gods, not merely in feasting and victory, but in danger and defeat. For the gods, too, are in the hands of fate, and the Scandinavian vision of the twilight of the gods that was to end the world showed the heroes dying valiantly in the last hopeless fight against the forces of chaos—loyal and fearless to the last. It is an incomplete but not an ignoble religion. It contains those elements of character which it was the special mission of the Nordic peoples to add to modern civilization and to Christianity itself.   –G. M. Trevelyan in History of England, Vol. One

Of course, the heroic, bardic Christianity was bound to come into conflict with Roman universalism. It was the Welsh Christians who first felt the sting of Roman universalism. They told Rome that they were going to maintain their provincialism:

“Be it known to you, that we consider it our duty to obey and submit to the church of God, to the pope of Rome, and to every good Christian—to love them in every situation and in all circumstances, and to assist all both by word and deed, in becoming children of the Lord. We know of no other obedience to him you call pope, or father, and this we are prepared to render to him and to every Christian for ever. Beyond this, we are subject to the archbishop of Caerlean, who is a guide and an overseer, under God, to direct and keep us on in the spiritual path.”

The result of the Welsh Christians’ stubborn provincialism was the massacre of the Welsh Monks of Bangor:

Bangor! O’er the murder wail!    
Long thy ruins told the tale,
Shatter’d towers and broken arch
Long recall’d the woeful march:
On thy shrine no tapers burn,
Never shall they priests return:
The pilgrim sighs, and sings for thee,
O miserere, Domine!

-Walter Scott

What does the massacre of Welsh monks by Saxon pagans have to do with the negro worship of 2012? It has everything to do with it. The universalist Roman “Christians,” despite the fact that the Welsh were their fellow Christians, encouraged and countenanced the massacre in order to punish the Welsh Christians’ refusal to recognize the universalist faith of Rome. (1) The Saxons, many years later, when they were Christian, suffered the same fate as the Welsh Monks of Bangor. Universalist Rome sanctioned the Norman invasion of the provincial Saxons. And on it goes throughout the Christian centuries of Europe. Luther rebelled against a universalist system that had no room for the babe in the manager and the man of sorrows, but that initial revolt simply resulted in more universalist systems designed to eradicate every vestige of provincial Christianity.

Burke spoke of the same forces at work in the French Revolution. The universalists were willing to shed rivers of blood for the good of mankind, but is it ever for the good of mankind when an elite hierarchy, dedicated to an abstract concept of the good, a concept of their own creation, destroy their own people? The modern liberals are following the same path of all universalist lovers of mankind; they are trying to extinguish the light that emanates from a provincial people with faith in the living God so that their perfect, utopian system can survive and save mankind. And, as is always the case with the universalists, mankind consists only of those they deem worthy of living in utopia. Translated to the contemporary European countries, that means that negroes are sacred, for they are the most natural, and therefore the most fully human, of all the creatures that walk the earth. When the liberals “help” the negroes, they are serving a universal mankind of their own creation. The extent to which a white European buys into a universal, propositional faith will determine the extent to which he is willing to go to in order to defend his people against the onslaught of the devil and his minions.  If he embraces universalism, he will consider the negro his god, and he will not defend his race. If he rejects universalism for the provincial hearth fires of the European people, he will defend his race against all the world.

Since universal, utopian systems, whether they profess to serve God or profess to serve mankind, are not connected to the living God, Jesus Christ, there is no faith, no hope and no charity in the cultures emanating from such systems. So what possesses people to create such inhumane systems devoid of God’s grace? The enemy of mankind possesses them. He seduces them with the old temptation “Ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” The great lie still corrupts and corrodes man’s eternal jewel, his soul.

Nothing that is of the spirit can live in the soul-dead world of diversified, universal Babylon. Only in the provincial, what the liberals would call racist, Europe of the antique Europeans is there a place for that charity of honor and the love that passeth all understanding. Burke was bold enough to “cherish” his prejudices because they stemmed from a blood faith in a provincial God born in a stable in Bethlehem. And Ratty loved his European river for the same reason: “By it and with it and on it and in it.”

For many years the universalists have been feeding off the remnants of provincial Europe, because there is no human sustenance in utopian Europe. But as they consume what is left of the provincial, Christian, European harvest they will come face to face with a world of their own making, a world devoid of all mercy, all charity, all hope, and all faith, except for a desperate faith in nature and nature’s god, the negro. The ethos of this new world, a fusion of utopian liberalism and paganism, was articulated many years ago by the Russian revolutionary and “lover of humanity,” Bakunin: “All tender and gentle feelings of kinship, friendship, love, gratitude and even honor itself should be choked off in the revolutionary’s breast by the single cold passion of his revolutionary task.” And what is the revolutionary’s task? To destroy God by destroying every last remnant of His people. We too, the Europeans, have a task: to be true to our instincts, our people, and our God. +

__________________________________

(1) I don’t care whether someone is called venerable, saintly, or devout; if he betrays his own people to the barbarian hordes, because he is loyal to an abstract savage god of his own creation, he is not Christian. He is Satan’s own! This was the “venerable” Bede’s retrospective on the massacre at Bangor:

It is said that of the monks who had come to pray about twelve hundred perished in this battle, and only fifty escaped by flight. Brocmail and his men took to their heels at the first assault, leaving those whom they should have protected unarmed and exposed to the sword-strokes of the enemy. Thus, long after his death, was fulfilled Bishop Augustine’s prophecy that the faithless Britons, who had rejected the offer of eternal salvation, would incur the punishment of temporal destruction.

The Jacobins who consigned all the French aristocrats in Haiti to the less-than-tender mercies of black savages, and our modern liberals who excuse every black atrocity with, “You must understand their rage,” are cut from the same cold, heartless, universalist cloth as Bede. I’ve had my fill of such creatures.

Only the provincial Christian is a man to be admired and emulated. Thomas Nelson Page describes such a man much better than I can: “He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged and unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart – a Goth.” The most noticeable thing about the un-Goth-like modern white man is his absence of heart.

Posted in Bred in the Bone, Christ the Hero, Christianity: Neither a Theory Nor a Philosophy, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , | Comments Off on My People

Upon the Heath

Posted on October 20, 2012 by cwny

Speak then to me, who neither beg nor fear
Your favours nor your hate. – Banquo

__________

Though it seems obvious to an antique European that the modern Europeans have replaced Christianity with negro worship, it is not so obvious to the modern European. He has been taken in hook, line, and sinker by Satan’s shell game. Once the white man allowed Satan to make Christianity a propositional faith, the road was clear for negro worship. Halfway-house Christians become indignant when you tell them that they too, despite their professed Christianity, are members of the liberals’ negro worshipping cult. The confusion lies in the halfway-house Christians’ failure to understand the nature of an institutionalized state religion. In such a religion there will always be the zealous devotees, who believe with all their heart, mind, and soul, the lukewarm devotees, the practical devotees – “it’s best to go along with the powers that be” – and the sincere, but non-fanatical devotees. The zealots set the tone for the rest of the devotees – sincere, practical and indifferent. It is their rules, the zealots’, which must be adhered to.

Chris “The Tingler” Matthews, who says he “tingles” from head to toe when Obama speaks, is an example of a negro-worshipping zealot. He was trained by Jesuits, of which he is inordinately proud considering his hostility towards Christianity, but has retained nothing of the faith the Jesuits taught him except a belief in the infallibility of human reason. Matthews’ tingling admiration for everything The Obama says and does, and his unwillingness to speak ill of any black man no matter what his crime, are proof of Taine’s assertion about the inability of reason to control the passions of our hearts:

In every doctrine which wins men over to it, the sophistry it contains is less potent than the promises it makes; its power over them is greater through their sensibility than through their intelligence; for, if the heart is often the dupe of the head, the latter is much more frequently the dupe of the former. We do not accept a system because we deem it a true one, but because the truth we find in it suits us. Political or religious fanaticism, any theological or philosophical channel in which truth flows, always has its source in some ardent longing, some secret passion, some accumulation of intense, painful desire to which a theory affords an outlet…

Of course Matthews is not wrong because he has passions, he is wrong because his passion is for the negro rather than Christ, for negro-worshipping America rather than Christian Europe. Men must have a faith they can feel passionate about. The upper echelon of liberals has been able to impose their passionate faith in the negro on the less intense, but pliable (because they are without a passionate faith) rank and file Europeans. The Christian church men have joined the liberals and excused their apostasy with the great lie: “The colored people will pick up the mantle of Christianity discarded by the Europeans.” Oh really? Is that happening in Africa? In China? In Mexico? The colored people have returned to their heathen faiths, which they only superficially left to appease white people, while the Europeans have “progressed” to utopia, which resembles, in all its particulars, the subterranean dwelling that is not supposed to exist except in the discarded faith of the antique Europeans.

In the old Christian faith, the faithful were enjoined to hate the devil and all of his works. So too in the negro-worshipping faith are the faithful enjoined to hate the devil and all his works. But in the new faith it is the white man who is the devil. It is not enough to love the sacred negro; you must hate the devil, the white man. This new faith puts the Christian clergyman in a paradoxical position. Christianity has always been a European phenomenon; its only sincere practitioners were to be found in Europe and the countries settled by Europeans. So it would seem to be in the self-interest of the Christian clergyman, and in the interest of the Christian churches, that white influence and white dominance should be spread to all the regions of the earth. But such is not the case. The Christian clergymen work diligently to rid the world of the white man. How do we explain this paradox? One line from Hamlet explains the white hating clergymen: “things mortal move them not at all…” The European clergymen despise all things human. They consider themselves as the Illuminati, or the enlightened ones, who receive and dispense the esoteric knowledge necessary for “enlightenment.” The people who built a culture, a truly human culture, based on their love for the God-Man, are despised by the Illuminati, because anything that stinks of humanity is an anathema to the enlightened members of the clerical caste.

Years and years of compromise with paganism have brought the Europeans to this inhuman pass. Now, as in all “enlightened” religious systems, the basest forms of race-mixing and sexual perversions are permitted as part of the religious ritual. And race-mixing is not just permitted, it is a holy rite. So too is sodomy, becoming, in the citadels of once Christian nations, a holy rite. The negro, the sign and symbol of racial and sexual Babylon, will always be exalted in the new esoteric religion so that savagery and inhumanity will thrive under the all-knowing and all-seeing eye of the Illuminati.

That negro worship is the new faith of the Christian Illuminati seems to be self-evident, yet the mere suggestion that such is the case, that the modern Christian worships the negro instead of Christ, is guaranteed to bring scorn, derision, and punitive action down upon the suggester. Of course the hysterical reaction one gets when pointing out the true religion of the modern white man merely proves what we already know. The liberals will respond with fire and sword when their faith is challenged.

Although the church men spawned liberalism by emptying their churches of the human element – the European people and the God-Man – it is doubtful that the secular liberals will ultimately allow the churches to survive, because after clearing the ground for liberalism the Christian Illuminati have always lagged slightly behind the secular liberals. They embraced racial Babylon and then sexual Babylon after the secular liberals led the way. This could, despite their pathetic attempt to catch up to the secular liberals, leave the church men out in the cold when the kingdom of hell on earth is established. Doesn’t the Book of Revelation speak of a war between the secular heathens and the apostatized church men, with the former defeating the latter?

And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.

And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.

For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.

And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.

Possibly that is just wishful thinking on my part, wanting to see the apostate clergymen hoisted on their own petards, but I have observed, in my lifetime, the inability of even the most liberal of “Christian” clergymen to really please the mad-dog liberals. The mad-doggians still mistrust the apostates no matter how ardently and devoutly the apostate clergymen spout their liberal pieties and sing their paeans to the sacred negro. Their dilemma is much like Buckingham’s dilemma in Shakespeare’s Richard III. After doing every evil under the sun in compliance with Richard’s orders, Buckingham grows “circumspect” and balks at killing Edward’s young sons, the true heirs of the throne. He is killed because he wanted to be evil only to a certain point and then stop. But there is no stopping on the slippery slope that leads to Babylon. Once the Christian clergymen accepted racial Babylon, they had to go on and accept sexual Babylon and the destruction of the only people who stood in the way of racial and sexual Babylon.

What I said of Tony Blair is true of The Tingler. If Chris Matthews was one isolated mad man, we could lament over his personal tragedy, but we could ignore him as an isolated mad man. But The Tingler is not one isolated mad man, he represents Satan’s legions marching triumphant over the ruins of Christian Europe. What Chris Matthews represents is a tragedy of Shakespearean proportions.  Macbeth and Banquo both stood on the heath and confronted the witches. Each man made a fateful choice. Macbeth chose to cast his lot with Satan, and Banquo chose Christ. European liberals, embodied by The Tingler, have made their fateful choice on the heath, and they, like Macbeth, have chosen Satan. Matthews’ heart is hardened toward the millions of infants slaughtered in the charnel houses of Babylon, but his heart bleeds if one word of criticism is leveled at the black barbarian ruler of Babylon. Matthews’ face is truly the face of evil in all its banal, insidious, immoral superficiality. All such moral reprobates always end up contemplating a bloodstained world of their own making that resembles a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

A people with an upper crust of moral pariahs such as Chris Matthews ruling over them are a people that have lost their collective soul. There is no spiritual center to such people; they will be blown along by the satanic winds of change from one perversion to another. What would it take for the European people to reclaim their soul? They need to see with their hearts. They need to see a Europe that was, despite all her imperfections (which I could catalog for you better than any of her liberal detractors), consecrated to His sacred heart, not in some formal ceremony, but in the daily lives of her people who said with one voice, “Yes, we know that Man, in all His divinity and in all His humanity.” It is no small thing to have a people before us who had intimate knowledge of the living God. It is something more precious than gold, and certainly more precious than the esoteric knowledge of the liberals who bid us abandon our European past for a future where we can worship the negro and hate the Christian Europeans.

All the forces of Liberaldom, which are the forces of hell, have gathered together to condemn the white European. His doom has been pronounced and the sentence is irrevocable. But why should the European accept Satan’s death sentence? Why can’t I, or any European with a European heart, go and stand upon the same heath where Macbeth and the Liberal Europeans sold their souls to the devil? And why can’t I, and those other faithful Europeans, stand with Banquo and hurl our defiance at Satan and his liberal minions? No doom is irrevocable in the realm of the spirit. And such a realm is our Europe; it’s where our people and our God reside. If we seem to be bereft of God and without a people, it is because we have not had the courage to seek out the European realm of existence, where He is worshipped in spirit and in truth. If we hate where we should hate, the liberals and all their works, we will love the people and the God whom we should love.

It is time to renew the covenant; Christ will never forsake His people, and we few, we Europeans, will never forsake Him. We can be part of the New Babylon, in which liberals tingle from head to toe at every word spoken by their black barbarian gods. Or we can be part of a European world that was forged by hearts of fire who saw the risen Lord. It shouldn’t be a hard choice to make. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on Upon the Heath

That Which is Essential

Posted on October 13, 2012 by cwny

“O, happy living things! No tongue
Their beauty might declare:
A spring of love gushed from my heart,
And I blessed them unaware:
Sure my kind saint took pity on me,
And I blessed them unawares.
“The selfsame moment I could pray:
And from my neck so free
The Albatross fell off, and sank
Like lead into the sea.”

__________

A New Zealand government official recently pronounced that the New Zealand government was “totally committed” to a more “diverse” New Zealand. In the state of Maine a group of activists representing Somalian immigrants threatened to sue when a government official suggested that the Somalians needed to adjust to the existing culture of their new country. In that once blessed plot of earth called England, a British MP declared that it would be necessary to build four new cities about the size of London in order to make room for the new colored arrivals, who somehow are considered essential to Britain’s existence. Not to be outdone by insane negro-loving liberals, a Mexican activist group demanded that the words “illegal immigrants” be abandoned because (isn’t it obvious?) the use of the word “illegal” is “racist.” It doesn’t matter what formerly European nation we go to, we always hear the same refrain: “We must become diverse,” which means, “We must destroy the white race.”

The great movement toward diversity is called progress. But why is it called progress? To what are we progressing? We are progressing toward a perfect world — though no one knows exactly when we will arrive there. What will the perfect world be like? We never hear anything definite from the utopians. All we know is that there will be no white people in the new world and there will be no Christ in the new world. This is acknowledged and applauded by the liberals and denied by the Christian atheists, who insist that what is going on in European countries is the inclusion of the colored races, not the destruction of the white race. What about the absence of Christ in the new world order? The Christian atheists also deny that such will be the case. “We are simply purifying the Faith by making it less European and more inclusive. A faith, like a nation, must be inclusive if it is to survive.”

The Christian atheists should not be allowed to get away with such outright lies. How can capitulation to a cabal of merciless liberals and bloodthirsty barbarians of color be called a “purification” of the Christian faith? And how can we have any touchstone of reality if we deny all of our acquired wisdom about the nature of God and man, derived from our deepest intuitions about things spiritual, for a new rationalist faith in intellectual vapor? The answer to that question can be seen on the faces of frightened, lost white people who have allowed their racial identities and their faith to be diversified.

I recently saw a video on YouTube put out by a group of young French men and women, who called themselves “Generation Identitaire.” Their heartfelt declaration of war against the diversifying powers-that-be was quite moving. They no longer shall be rootless and without an identity; they will be white and French was the thrust of their declaration. But let me insert an old man’s warning: There is no such thing as a white identity that denies, ignores, or skirts around the white man’s faith in Christ. Beneath the outward bravado of the pagan nationalists I see spiritual surrender in their souls. They have sided with the liberals on the central issue: “Did Christ rise from the dead?” And they have sided with the Christian atheists by conceding that whoever wears the collar or cassock has the right to define Christianity. Hence, when a clergyman says Christianity means diversity, the young pagans reject Christianity despite the fact that their people, the white Europeans when they were Christian, rejected diversity in the name of Christ. There is nothing new about the deification of youth. That is as old as paganism. And there is nothing new about the assertion that we should be proud of our race because our race, biologically speaking, is smarter and stronger than other races. That too is pagan. What the Christian European, who is now rejected by the liberal and the neo-pagan, brought into the darkness of paganism was a belief that youth was a thing of the spirit, not a product of biology; nor was skin color primarily a biological entity; it too belonged in the realm of the spirit. If our whiteness is not of the spirit, an external sign of our inmost soul, why should we desire to fight for it? And if youth is not of the spirit, if it is merely a transitory biological strength to be passed from one generation of apes to the next generation of apes, then of what use is the sweet bird of youth? It is an evil phantom masquerading as the Messiah.

Abstract theories about race and religion, whether they come from the right or the left, will always lead us away from our people and our God. We are men, as Burke so eloquently put it, who derive our knowledge of existence from our “untaught feelings” about the nature of existence. If we forsake those untaught feelings for modern research and utopian science then we will have only a gypsy’s faith in that diversified ant heap called nature.

When I read about such groups as the French Identitaire, I realize that we, the European people, have left the Christian hangover era behind. We no longer have any of the ethical remnants of Christianity left in the formerly Christian nations. Compassion and mercy are dead. There is only the technological barbarism of the liberals and the traditional barbarism of the colored tribes left. And white youths who quite rightly recoil at such barbarism have no knowledge of or feeling for the European culture of the past which was a culture diametrically opposed to the twin barbarian cultures of modern Europe. Those of us who have not lost sight of antique Europe and the God who presided over it must keep the bridge to that sacred past clear of liberals and colored barbarians. We do this for two reasons. First, our survival depends on keeping the bridge to the past secure. And secondly, there will always be some who will see beyond liberalism, beyond neo-paganism, to the Heart of Hearts. The bridge must stay clear so that those loving hearts can find their way home.

The Europeans’ apostasy parallels the apostasy of the ancient Hebrews. In a multitude of different guises the modern European worships nature. He has returned to Baal. The negro will always be at the center of such worship because he is the most ‘natural’; he is the embodiment of all that is primitive, dark, and deadly. So long as we accept the hideous lie that negro worship is an upward movement, we will continue to spiral ever deeper into hell.

In what is certainly Anthony Trollope’s best short story, “The Parson’s Daughter of Oxney Colne,” we read of the daughter of a country parson in the parish of Oxney Colne. The young woman is beautiful and virtuous, but she is also poor. A rich suitor comes along and falls in love with the young heroine’s outward beauty. To her inner beauty, he is indifferent because he is incapable of comprehending what inner beauty is. The couple get engaged, but the parson’s daughter begins to suspect that she is not appreciated for what she feels to be essential – her soul.

‘But I should wish to make you think how great is the leap in the world which you are about to take.’ Then again they walked on for many steps before she answered him.

‘Tell me, then, John,’ she said, when she had sufficiently considered what words she would speak;—and as she spoke a dark bright colour suffused her face, and her eyes flashed almost with anger. ‘What leap do you mean? Do you mean a leap upwards?’

‘Well, yes; I hope it will be so.’

‘In one sense, certainly, it would be a leap upwards. To be the wife of the man I loved; to have the privilege of holding his happiness in my hand; to know that I was his own—the companion whom he had chosen out of all the world—that would, indeed, be a leap upward; a leap almost to heaven, if all that were so. But if you mean upwards in any other sense—’

‘I was thinking of the social scale.’

‘Then, Captain Broughton, your thoughts were doing me dishonour.’

‘Doing you dishonour!’

‘Yes, doing me dishonour. That your father is, in the world’s esteem, a greater man than mine is doubtless true enough. That you, as a man, are richer than I am as a woman is doubtless also true. But you dishonour me, and yourself also, if these things can weigh with you now.’

‘Patience,—I think you can hardly know what words you are saying to me.’

‘Pardon me, but I think I do. Nothing that you can give me—no gifts of that description—can weigh aught against that which I am giving you. If you had all the wealth and rank of the greatest lord in the land, it would count as nothing in such a scale. If—as I have not doubted—if in return for my heart you have given me yours, then—then—then, you have paid me fully. But when gifts such as those are going, nothing else can count even as a make-weight.’

‘I do not quite understand you,’ he answered, after a pause. ‘I fear you are a little high-flown.’ And then, while the evening was still early, they walked back to the parsonage almost without another word.

In the Gospels there are men such as Philip the apostle who immediately see there is something special about Jesus. When Nathaniel asks him, “Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?”, Philip answers, “Come and see.” In contrast, there are men such as Caiaphas who see nothing extraordinary about Christ because of their moral blindness. This is what we are up against in modern Europe. The difference between Christian Europe and Babylonian Europe is clear to those who do not have blinders on their hearts. The morally blind Caiaphases are determined to destroy the European people by blending them into the impersonal mass of humanity that constitutes modern Babylon.

The Europeans have been to the mountain and have stood on holy ground. And they have stood on holy ground because they embraced the little human things that lead us to God. St. Paul is the greatest of all theologians because his epistles are addressed to small groups of individual human beings. All transcendent thought comes from a concern for particular human beings. Shakespeare’s “simple” stories take us to the heights and depths because Shakespeare is concerned with the human heart, not with theories about humanity. And likewise the incomparable Burke; his letters are irreplaceable works of genius because he wrote them from his heart, without moral blinders on, to stir the hearts of other human beings who still had hearts that lived.

Modern Europeans have contracted a brain fever that has gotten into their blood. Until that fever breaks, there is nothing that can be done with them. They will continue to worship the negro and try to appease the lords of Liberaldom. But if that fever should finally break! It would be like water released from a gigantic dam. All of Liberaldom would be washed away. Do we know the day and the hour of that great cleansing?  Of course we don’t, because the human heart and God’s grace are mysteries. But when the European’s fever breaks, the moral blinders will be removed from his heart, and he will dream dreams and see visions again of a babe in a manger and a Man of Sorrows. +

Posted in Defense of the White Race, Negro worship, Neo-paganism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on That Which is Essential

Many Are They That Rise Up Against Us

Posted on October 6, 2012 by cwny

I will not be afraid of ten thousands of people, that have set themselves against me round about. Arise, O Lord; save me, O my God: for thou hast smitten all mine enemies upon the cheek bone; thou hast broken the teeth of the ungodly. Salvation belongeth unto the Lord: thy blessing is upon thy people. Selah. Psalms 3: 6 –8

__________

In the year 1665 the Great Plague struck London, killing over one hundred thousand people. The following year, 1666, two thirds of the city was destroyed by the Great Fire of London. Sir Christopher Wren, the great architect, built a new St. Paul’s Cathedral after the fire. It is said that in his old age Wren often asked to be carried to a place beneath the dome so that he could look at the magnificent church which was the result of his vision and creativity. Wren must have loved much, his God and his people, to have built that labor of love. But could Wren’s new St. Paul’s ever replace, in the heart of one who loved the old church, the old St. Paul’s? Of course not. In Ainsworth’s novel, Old Saint Paul’s, he describes the feelings of a devotee of the old church:

He lived to see the new cathedral completed by Sir Christopher Wren, and often visited it with feelings of admiration, but never with the same sentiments of veneration and awe that he had experienced, when, in times long gone by, he had repaired to Old Saint Paul’s.

So something wonderful went out of the heart of London when old St. Paul’s was burnt to the ground even though Wren’s cathedral was worthy of its predecessor. But with the building of the new St. Paul’s, the tragic destruction of the old St. Paul’s was somewhat mitigated. There was hope that over time the New St. Paul’s could become as venerated as the old St. Paul’s. Can the same be said of the European people, who are the result of God’s creativity and His vision – can they, once destroyed, be rebuilt as old St. Paul’s Cathedral was rebuilt? No, they cannot be rebuilt because they are human beings created in the image of God, and the ongoing attempt to destroy the European people in the name of Babylon is an affront to God.

There seems to be some confusion about who is the creator and who is the creature in the minds of the secular and religious utopian theorists. If God is the creator, then His creatures should live their lives as God, not liberal utopians, ordained. If He created people of separate races, then shouldn’t we, as God’s creatures, try to maintain that separation? Is the Tower of Babel a myth or is it an actual event in our salvation history that we should regard as a warning from God? All concern about Babel and racial segregation goes out the window if we regard man as the creator of God. If God becomes a theory of the Utopians, who cast Him as a civil rights advocate, the final point of an evolutionary process, a watchmaker, a symbol of the best that we can be, or a forerunner of the sacred negro, then the traditional God of the Christians ceases to exist. And of course this is what the modern utopians of church and state desire. They desire the death of the traditional God of the European people, because if He dies the European people die, which allows the liberals to build their brave new multi-racial world over the corpses of white Europeans. “Christians” who side with the purveyors of racial diversity are not Christian, because the Christian God is not an abstract God; He is a God who lives. We cannot know Him through a diversified mass of nondescript people; we can only know Him through our non-diverse relationships with our own people. And of course if there was one ounce of Christianity in the modern Christian churchmen, they would see all the marks of Satan in the modern movement toward “diversity.” Even if the stated purpose of diversity, “the equality of the races,” was really the true purpose of diversity, it would be wrong, because the races are inherently unequal. To impose a false equality on them would be hell. But diversity has nothing to do with equality. A few white liberals of advanced years might hold on to such views of diversity, but the vast majority of mad-dog liberals and conservative liberals know what diversity means. It means the destruction of the white race by outright murder and by miscegenation. The first method is preferred in African countries where blacks are in the majority, and the second method is preferred in countries where blacks still constitute a minority. There is no doubt, because we have seen what happened in Haiti, in the Reconstruction Era South, and post-white South Africa, that the ‘death by miscegenation’ societies will become ‘death by murder’ societies once the blacks are in the majority in the once white nations. It is only the white grazers who don’t know about the ongoing war against white people. The liberals certainly know, and they rejoice every time a vestige of old Europe is destroyed. The English people of Christopher Wren’s time wanted St. Paul’s Cathedral restored because it was a symbol of their faith. So too do the liberals want the European Parliament building in Strasbourg preserved because it is designed to look like the Tower of Babel, the sign and symbol of the modern Europeans’ faith.

In Walter Scott’s novel Quentin Durward the title character urges a gypsy, a man of indeterminate race and no faith, to think about Christ before the executioners put him to death. But the gypsy is obdurate:

“What canst thou expect, dying in such opinions, and impenitent?”

“To be resolved into the elements,” said the hardened atheist, pressing his fettered arms against his bosom; “my hope, trust, and expectation is that the mysterious frame of humanity shall melt into the general mass of nature, to be recompounded in the other forms with which she daily supplies those which daily disappear, and return under different forms—the watery particles to streams and showers, the earthy parts to enrich their mother earth, the airy portions to wanton in the breeze, and those of fire to supply the blaze of Aldebaran and his brethren.—In this faith have I lived, and I will die in it!—Hence! begone!—disturb me no farther!

We structure our lives around our faith. The European intelligentsia of church and state have become the devotees of nature and nature’s god. As we all are to melt into that general mass of nature at our deaths, so must our lives, the liberals tell us, be structured so that we are blended into one diverse mass of inhumanity here on earth. We must be diversified into non-existence. Our connections to our kith and kin must be obliterated so we can be in contact with the mass of nature personified by the negro. The European Christian will always refuse to become part of a diversified inhuman mass of nature. There is no genuine love in such a mass, because the inhuman mass lacks that which makes us humane – the love of our own people and the love of the living God who took flesh and dwelt among us.

The Christian Londoners, with Wren leading the way, rebuilt St. Paul’s Cathedral, an important symbol of their faith. Would those same Christians have consented to the destruction of something infinitely more valuable than St. Paul’s Cathedral? Would they have willingly consented to hand their wives, their children, and their city over to a heathen army of blacks and apostate white men? No, they would not. They would have fought to the last man to prevent such a horror. Why then do Europeans of the present day do what was unthinkable to the Europeans of the 1600’s? It’s a question of faith. When the Europeans allowed their faith in Christ to be “sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought” they lost their way and stumbled blindly toward a death in life existence in the kingdom of the negro worshipping liberals.

It is not a case, as the pagan white nationalists tell us, of getting the information out to white people. The information is there. From billboards in Duluth to Mexican Pride Day in Texas the message is loud and clear: White people are evil. The white grazers do not want to dispute that fact; they simply want to be allowed to make the words, “evil whites,” part of the past. “We were evil, we were racist and sexist, but now we have changed. We can become part of Babylon if we are allowed another chance. Please, Mr. Liberal, please, Mr. Negro, won’t you allow me to crawl at your feet in the new Babylon?”

“For a time,” say the Babylonians; and under their breaths, “But when the time is right we will kill you.”

The white grazer has been betrayed by the white intelligentsia, who have foisted their ignorance on him. “Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart.” That’s what universal suffrage and democracy has brought upon us. The peasant is just as blind as the intellectual because he too has blinders on his heart. A man is not a man until he can love in spite of doom, in spite of the scorn and hatred of the world. Hamlet finally became Hamlet the Dane when he leaped into Ophelia’s grave declaring his love for her: “This is I, Hamlet the Dane!.. I lov’d Ophelia.”

And so did Christ love us. He was and is the inspiration for all true heroism. He faced scorn and derision for His loved ones and He continues to love them in spite of doom. A passion united to His passion cannot be defeated. But such a passion cannot be feigned. It must come from a heart that truly loves. That is what separates the modern European from the antique European. The antique European was a man who loved much. He didn’t love an abstract, generic people of an indeterminate race. He loved his own people. And he didn’t love an abstract God — he loved the Man of Sorrows. The Scriptures speak of a God whose love passeth all understanding. The modern theologians disagree. They worship a God of limited powers with a limited capacity for love. He bids us, according to the liberals, save our small quota of love for strangers outside our own race. To them all our love is due. Why? Because, we are told, “They alone are natural, they alone are holy: in the name of the abstracted intellect, the sacred negro, and the ghostly looking man in the white lab coat, amen.” The bargain which the liberals offer the white man is this: “If you renounce your race and your God, we will permit you to live a kind of gypsy existence on the fringes of Liberaldom. But you must renounce your race and your faith.”

Even if the white man accepted such a bargain, the liberal and the colored barbarians would not hold to their part of the bargain, because neither the liberal nor the colored barbarian can ever sup full of horrors. Their regime is built on lies, so it must be artificially maintained by terror and blood. The mere existence of the white man, even if he complies with all the dictates of Liberaldom, is a sign of contradiction to the liberals. Whiteness reminds the liberal of a people and a God that he wants no part of: “Remind me not of my end,” the liberal says in the blindness of his heart. Is it possible to destroy every reminder of Him by destroying His people? That is the liberal’s desire. But it is not my desire, nor is it the desire of any European who is still a European. I don’t believe that ten million liberals and an infinity of colored barbarians are ultimately a match for European hearts that truly love. It might seem unrealistic, the notion that a few who love much can defeat many, but isn’t the unadulterated Christian faith based on such an unrealistic and “absurd” premise? Christ was not even many; He was one. And the history of the European people, during the Christian era, is full of examples of a faithful few conquering a multitude of Satan’s minions: King Alfred vs. the Danes, Charles Martel vs. the Moslems, Havelock vs. the Indian hordes, the British at Rorke’s Drift vs. the Zulus, and Christian Europeans against the world. “By the Cross We Conquer,” is true for us as individuals in our war with the devil, and it is true for us as a people. When “By the Cross We Conquer,” is written in our hearts, we are an invincible people. Fairy tale Europe, where the undiverse few conquer the diversified many, is sacred Europe, and we few will champion that Europe against all the world. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Blood faith, Bred in the Bone, Christ the Hero, Grazers, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on Many Are They That Rise Up Against Us

The Living Hell of Utopia

Posted on September 29, 2012 by cwny

Nothing can be conceived more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician. It comes nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man. It is like that of the principle of evil himself, incorporeal, pure, unmixed, dephlegmated, defecated evil. It is no easy operation to eradicate humanity from the human breast. What Shakespeare calls “the compunctious visitings of nature” will sometimes knock at their hearts, and protest against their murderous speculations. But they have a means of compounding with their nature. Their humanity is not dissolved. They only give it a long prorogation. They are ready to declare, that they do not think two thousand years too long a period for the good that they pursue. It is remarkable, that they never see any way to their projected good but by the road of some evil. Their imagination is not fatigued with the contemplation of human suffering through the wild waste of centuries added to centuries of misery and desolation. Their humanity is at their horizon-and, like the horizon, it always flies before them. The geometricians, and the chemists, bring, the one from the dry bones of their diagrams, and the other from the soot of their furnaces, dispositions that make them worse than indifferent about those feelings and habitudes, which are the support of the moral world. –  Burke

__________

I admire those people who grow their own food and eat what they grow, but I am not that self-sufficient. I still must depend on the grocery stores for my food. And it is mostly at the grocery stores that I get to rub shoulders with the white hoi polloi. The other day I listened to two white female checkout clerks (both mid-fortyish) going on about a black rapper named Snoop Dog. They and their children just love Snoop Dogg. And both women were also professed born again Christians. Has it come to this? Is Christianity synonymous with the worship of black rappers? Do all Europeans feel an uncontrollable desire to abase themselves before their black gods? The answer to both questions is, unfortunately, yes. Those two women were mothers. They were what would be called ordinary white people, which is what makes it all the more tragic. We know how debased and satanic academics are, but if the black worshipping faith has spread to run-of-the-mill working class whites, which it most certainly has, there is a greater need in Europe than ever before for hearts of fire who will oppose negro worshipping liberalism. When “Christian” white women say Snoop Dogg’s name with the reverence once reserved for His name, it is time to draw the sword and throw the sheath away.

It is truly astounding when we read the writings of the 20th century academics, authors, theologians and thinkers to see that none of them saw fit to write about the Europeans’ struggle to survive as a people in the face of the unrelenting hatred of the liberals and the colored barbarians. It was as if there was a code of silence, rigidly enforced, that forbade conservatives and liberals from mentioning the black rhinoceros in the living room. Long tomes were written by the liberals about the glories of communism, and long tomes were written by the conservatives about the evils of communism, but nowhere, in the “respectable” books and journals of the European intelligentsia do we find any concern for the survival of the European people. The British and the Americans fought for democracy in both world wars and for the democratic version of egalitarianism after World War II, but they never fought for the white race. Quite the contrary, it seemed to be a given (though we don’t know when it was decided) in the 20th century, particularly in the latter half, that the white man should obligingly disappear from the face of the earth. If he wasn’t willing to disappear quietly, he would be exterminated. And sadly, there is no difference between the anti-European writings and speeches of the Christian clergymen, whose churches were founded by Europeans, and the liberals’ anti-European diatribes. The conservative intelligentsia, the liberal intelligentsia, and the clerical intelligentsia were all of one accord: “the white man must cease to exist.”

The 20th century was the century when the European intelligentsia won over the European people to a systems analysis view of existence. Since all of life could be comprehended, the experts told us, by analyzing nature in all of its components, the intelligent man need only decide which systems analysis expert was correct and go with him. The democratic capitalist expert, the communist expert, the distributist expert, the religious expert were in their Gnostic view of existence all compact. The European people ceased to be a people; they became raw material. And lo and behold, it was discovered that white people were defective raw material. Utopia could not be built with such spoiled raw material. The natural, vital people of color were the stuff that the utopians of the right and left dreamed of. The magic world of the utopian theologians, the utopian paradise of democratic government, the communist peoples’ republic, etc., could only come to fruition if the existing world order ceased to exist. And who (in the diseased minds of the utopian intellectuals of the 20th century) had been running the world and ruling the world for over 2,000 years? White people, of course. So it is white people that must perish. The utopians say that white people must vacate the earth because they fought senseless wars, because they were cruel, because they were unjust, and ten thousand other becauses. But not one of those reasons is the real reason that white utopians must destroy the white race. The white man must perish so the utopians’ abstract vision of a perfect world can live. The Jesuits in the 1500s in Paraguay wanted only pure Indians in their perfect state, just as the modern democratic wizards and magicians want only pure and vital negroes in their perfect state. The brilliant intellectuals of the 20th century thought they were ushering in a new world when in reality they were returning to the wizardry of paganism. “Mumbo jumbo, presto, dynamo, when the white race goes poof, we will all live in paradise.”

What lies behind this magical new world? But wait, wouldn’t it be more appropriate to ask who lurks behind the many masks of utopia? Satan is the mastermind behind all the utopian schemes. Utopian fantasies which eliminate white people only come from white people because it was whites who made Christianity a blood faith. Burned deep into the blood of the white man is a consciousness of Christ and a consciousness of Satan. In turning from Christ the whites have turned to Satan. Isn’t hell the ultimate utopia, a great intelligence presiding over indistinct human beings without personalities, because they have effaced the image of God in man by diversifying their race and their faith?

The portal to utopian hell is racial diversity. And racial diversity is protected and defended by Satan. He uses the curse of stupidity to defend diversity. We are back in the Garden reliving our original sin. “Are you stupid enough to believe in some artificial boundary of God’s?” was the essence of Satan’s temptation. “All power and knowledge exists for those who defy God’s boundaries.” We can hear Satan today loud and clear, “Diversity will make you strong, you shall be as gods, you will no longer be stupid.”

Only the third dumb brothers of fairy tale renown will be courageous enough to defy Satan’s charge of stupidity. Shakespeare was one such third dumb brother when he championed the little human things that make us great:

“I will hear that play;
For never anything can be amiss,
When simpleness and duty tender it.”

Yes, the simple play of our lives, as God ordained, will always be stupid in the reptilian eyes of Satan and in the soul-dead eyes of the white intelligentsia. Who dares to be stupid and risk their ridicule? No one dares in this most decadent of times. But that other third dumb brother, Edmund Burke, dared: “… in this enlightened age I am bold enough to confess that we are generally men of untaught feelings; that instead of casting away all our old prejudices, we cherish them to a very considerable degree…”

And we should be so bold as well. Our race is part of our soul, a gift from God; we haven’t the right to destroy God’s gift. The intelligentsia of church, academy, press, and state were and are the pied pipers of diversity. When the European people followed their lead, they became one aggregate herd of swine that are to be disposed of as quickly as possible.

The Europeans have ceded their birthright to the systems analysis men. If I were to read you a short summary of one of Shakespeare’s plays, the play would seem quite simple, just like a man’s life: “He was born, he mated, and he died.” But within Shakespeare’s simple plays are insights that cut to the heart of existence. If we didn’t read the plays but just settled for the plot summaries, we would never see life through Shakespeare’s penetrating eyes. And if we ignore a man’s connections to a particular family, race, and nation – those small units of the spirit that constitute a man’s soul – we will not have any knowledge of the essential man, we will only know a generic man doomed to live as an abstraction and then to die, ground into nothingness in the satanic mills of the utopians. It never ceases to amaze me when liberals feign concern about the suicide rate among white teenagers. Isn’t that the ultimate purpose of our modern educational system, the liquidation of white people? Those suicide victims are doing what they have been taught to do. Utopia means “not a place,” and people without a place commit suicide.

In an old musical the male lead declares that his attachment to his beloved has become “like breathing in and breathing out, it’s second nature to me now.” That is what the black worshipping faith has become to the white man – it’s second nature to him now. Years and years of relentless propaganda have turned the Christ-bearing people into the negro-worshipping people. The gas was turned on slowly, by degrees, so white people would not even notice they were breathing the deadly fumes of demonic negro worship. But we have all breathed the fumes, and virtually all of us are closer to negro-worshipping Europe than we are to Christian Europe. When I went to school, we were taught a song about the United Nations:

We are the United Nations of the world,
For peace, and freedom we stand…

The peace of the grave for white people and the freedom of hell for Satan’s colored minions.

The antique European living in the nowhere land of utopia needs to see the two separate worlds of Christian Europe and negro-worshipping Europe clearly. In the first world is all that makes life worth living: our families, our race, and our God. In that second world is unspeakable evil: “We have come face to face with a spirit of evil so strong as to be almost visible and tangible – a foe to all that is normal, sane, and creative, like the evil possessions recorded in the New Testament.“ Only a blood faith, our ancient faith, can exorcise the mind-forged demon faith from our souls.

We are engaged in a battle that is of Shakespearean proportions. Hamlet knew he had to kill Claudius because Claudius had –

Kill’d my king and whor’d my mother,
Popp’d in between  th’ election and my hopes…

The utopian liberals have killed our kith and kin, whor’d our native land, and placed the sacred black man on the altar where Christ should dwell. What should our response be to such inhuman savagery? Should we consent to our own oblivion because we are afraid of being called stupid and prejudiced? Should we consent to the death of Christian Europe because utopian liberals have decreed that sacred negroes like Snoop Dogg are the new gods of utopia? We have our eternal no, and we have fire and sword. The interim is ours. +

Posted in Blood faith, Defense of the White Race, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Utopianism | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Living Hell of Utopia

Keep Thy Heart

Posted on September 22, 2012 by cwny

“Satan conquers by distorting and diverting man’s spiritual eye, his heart. So keep thy heart, thou man of Europe, and thou shalt ride triumphant over ruin and death.” –CWNY

__________

The Family Research Council is one of those moderate Christian outfits that opposes gay marriage and legalized infanticide within the framework of Christ-hating democracy. The very name – Research Council – gives you an idea of just how dangerous they are. They are going to think the evils of liberal democracy away by careful study and a presentation of the facts to their misguided liberal brethren.

Despite their timidity and their willingness to stay democratic and innocuous, the Family Research Council was labeled a hate group by a true hate group, the white-hating, satanic organization called the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). In response to the SPLC’s vicious smear campaign, a left wing devotee of the SPLC went into the Family Research Council headquarters and shot a security guard. There was of course no outcry against the SPLC for encouraging the shooting, nor did any members of the SPLC express contrition for their part in the shooting even though the security guard was black. But why should they be contrite? They are just being consistent. They hate the Family Research Council because it supports white Christian causes, so should they shed any tears when one of their followers attacks such an organization?

Just as disturbing as the shooting – and this always seems to be the case nowadays in the aftermath of liberal hate crimes – was the reaction of the Family Research Council. The FRC and their supporters pointed out that it was their attackers, not them, who were intolerant and hateful. That is all too true; the liberals are the intolerant and hate-filled ones. Should the Christian hate, should the Christian be intolerant, or is Christianity synonymous with tolerance and the absence of hate? It would seem so if we listen to the modern proponents of Christianity. But aren’t “Christians” who tell us that we should not hate really telling us to surrender to the liberals? Why should a professed Christian spend his entire life explaining why he doesn’t hate gays, abortionists, feminists, and negroes? Far better to hate the devil and his minions as a true European Christian should:  “They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate.” Is it iced tea or skim milk that flows through the veins of the purveyors of tolerance, in the face of evil? Whatever it is, it isn’t blood.

This tolerance is not confined to the whites in the United States. Remember the English Defence League’s response to black hoods who were terrorizing London? They wanted “all decent people be they black, white, Sikh or Muslim…” to band together for England. That kind of response to violence against your own people is a response that will ensure that violence against your people continues. If William Tell responded to Gessler as “decent” whites now respond to liberals, there would be no legend of Tell because he and his family would have been exterminated. We can see the scene in our mind’s eye: Tell successfully shoots the arrow off his son’s head, but he does not, before shooting, put that second arrow, meant for Gessler if he misses, into his quiver. After Tell’s success, Gessler asks Tell if he harbors any resentment against him, Gessler, for putting his son’s life in jeopardy, and Tell responds, “No, there is no room in my heart for hate. I seek only to live in perfect accord with all men.”

“That’s all well and good,” says Gessler, “but I think I’ll throw you in prison anyway.”

As you recall, on the way to prison Tell is needed to steer the boat in perilous waters, so he is unbound. Once unbound, he escapes to the mountains, shoots Gessler, and leads his people in a counter-revolution. The modern version would be quite different. Once free, Tell would start printing pamphlets explaining to his countrymen why he was so tolerant of the man who wanted him to kill his own son. “I’m just too good and decent to hate. I won’t lift a finger against those who attack my kith and kin. That is not Christian.” As a result of Tell’s ‘tolerance,’ his family and his people are wiped out, and Gessler dances over the graves of Tell’s kith and kin.

What kind of people accepts Satan’s definition of tolerance and decency? The liberals define decency as an acceptance of their indecencies, and they define tolerance as a tolerance of the atrocities that they and their colored gods commit against white Europeans and unborn babies. No one cries “Hold, that’s enough,” in the ranks of the Europeans because the European has cut himself off from the mysterious human relationships, the love for his kith and kin, which engenders the passion in a man to protect innocence and fight to the death in defense of his own. If a man renounces his own people for an abstract faith in decency and tolerance, he has nothing to fight for. And such is the case with the “decent European.” He will blather on endlessly about decency and tolerance, but he is incapable of loving decent European people enough to defend them against the liberals and their barbarian allies. And he is too afraid of being called intolerant and hate-filled to attack the great haters and murderers of his own people.

Solzhenitsyn, when he first came over from Russia to the West, made the observation that the most striking thing about the Western people was their lack of courage. He didn’t understand why they didn’t defend themselves and their allies against the communists. If he would have probed deeper he would have discovered that the people of the West did not lack courage per se – they weren’t all congenital cowards; what they lacked was a passion for the little human things, hearth, home, and race, which engenders the spirit to fight for the right. A man who believes in the abstract principles of negro-worshipping democracy is not going to be passionately opposed to communism. He will be passionately opposed to South African apartheid and Southern segregation.

The Russian people have not thrown off the yoke of egalitarian Satanism; they are still riding the liberty, fraternity, and equality express train to oblivion. All that has changed is the train’s engineer. He now wears a democratic hat instead of a communist hat. The spiritual backbone that Solzhenitsyn said was lacking in the Western peoples is also lacking in the Russian people because they too have the white man’s disease. They have forsaken their people to go whoring after the gods of diversity. It’s happening slower in Russia than in the West, but the drive toward racial diversity and oblivion is in progress in Russia as well as the West. The worship of the great negro god is supposed to bring about the unity of east and west that all liberals long for. Is such a unity, the unity of the slime pit, possible? I suppose it is, but is it desirable? The antique European says it isn’t desirable, and he will fight to the knife against such a hellish final solution. But the liberal, the colored, and the ornamental, tolerant Christian will accept Satan’s slime pit so long as it is racially diverse.

The propositional Christian who has forsaken the bred-in-the-bone Christianity of his European ancestors will be forever trying (and trying in vain) to prove that Christianity and liberalism are compatible. On that issue the liberal has more sense. He will cite Christianity when it suits his purpose: “You are intolerant and unchristian.” But he knows who his enemies are. The enemy is Christ and the Europeans who cling to their prejudice in favor of Christian Europe over Babylonian Europe. The halfway house Christian who thinks he can preserve Christianity by joining it to Babylon has already, in his heart, surrendered to Babylon.

This question of tolerance is central to the demise of the European because his demise was caused by the evils he was tolerant of. He was tolerant of miscegenation, he was tolerant of sexual permissiveness, he was tolerant of feminism, he was tolerant of abortion, he was tolerant of homosexuality… Why such tolerance? The tolerance stemmed from men and women who severed their ties from Jesus Christ, “the God of their succeeding race,” for a faith in an abstract, philosophical Christianity that was flexible enough to bend with the times. You have no touchstone of reality if your faith is not in your blood, because the problems of life are too complex for the mind to solve. Our Lord became incarnate so we could know Him through the blood. When we try to know Him with our minds, through the contemplation of nature, or the contemplation of our navels, or any other form of mental computation, we always end up back in the Garden eating the forbidden apple.

Is it really so difficult for a European Christian to determine what is Christian tolerance and what is Christian apostasy? I don’t think it is. It is only difficult for ornamental Christians who want to blend Christianity and liberalism. The non-blended European, because his heart still lives, knows when it is time to sheath the sword in deference to human foibles to which we are all subject, and when it is time to unsheathe the sword because innocence and His people are at the mercy of tyrants who have no mercy. A man would have to be dead to every decent emotion that elevates a man in order to be tolerant of modern race-mixing, sexually liberated, Babylonian liberalism.

What Burke said of the French Jacobins, that they were seeking to attack God by destroying His image in man, is true of our modern Jacobin liberals. And they have in large part succeeded in effacing the image of God in man, because they have convinced Europeans that racial diversity is synonymous with Christianity. How could such a blasphemy become holy writ among the Europeans? Isn’t a diverse people a non-people? And doesn’t a people without an identity produce an abstract god without an identity? We have lost Christ because we have lost His people, the Europeans. The liberals, in hypocritical desperation (they claimed they could live in their minds alone) have placed the black man on their altars. Has there ever been such blindness of heart?

The race war instigated by the liberals has nothing to do with the enfranchisement of blacks. It is about the disenfranchisement of the white man from the human race, because if the white man disappears from the earth the image of God in man disappears from the earth. I hear the sneering pastors deploring the ‘racism’ of those white Europeans from the past: “Thank God we have overcome our prejudices.” I don’t know what god the Christ-hating pastors are thanking, but it is most certainly not the Man of Sorrows. God’s love was given a local habitation and a name when the Europeans asked Him to come “abide with us, for the darkness thickens.” That’s what the race war is all about, Charlie Brown: Whether white people will survive and show the world the image of God’s love in man, or whether they will succumb to the powers of darkness and allow the image of God in man to be effaced forever in a racially diverse hell on earth. Christian churches and organizations can survive without the European people. But faith in the God whose love passeth all understanding cannot survive without the witness of the European people, who knew that Man.

Their images I lov’d I view in thee,
And thou, all they, hast the all of me. +

Posted in Blood faith, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on Keep Thy Heart

The Bottomless Pit of Diversity

Posted on September 15, 2012 by cwny

They paid the price to reach their goal
Across a world in flame;
But their own hate slew their own soul
Before that victory came.

-Kipling

__________

Jefferson starts the Declaration of Independence by telling us about truths that he holds to be “self-evident.” But then he lists some alleged truths that are far from self-evident. I hold the following truth of Edmund Burke to be far more self-evident than Thomas Jefferson’s truths:

The writers on public law have often called this aggregate of nations a Commonwealth. They had reason. It is virtually one great state having the same basis of general law; with some diversity of provincial customs and local establishments. The nations of Europe have had the very same Christian religion, agreeing in the fundamental parts, varying a little in the ceremonies and in the subordinate doctrines. The whole of the polity and economy of every country in Europe has been derived from the same sources.

Anyone who writes about the European people without taking into account the effect that the Christian faith had upon them will never have any understanding of the European people. Even now, when the European people have ceased to be Christian, you must have an understanding of their Christian past in order to understand their post-Christian present.

The post-Christian European has taken the eschatology of Christianity and secularized it. To the Christian, past events are significant to the extent that they contribute to salvation history, which is why the history of the Europeans is relevant to Europeans as well as non-Europeans, whereas the history of the non-European people has relevance only when their history intersects with the Europeans’ history. The obvious reason for the antique Europeans’ ethnocentrism was because the Christian faith became part of European civilization. A European who is not ethnocentric is not a Christian. And of course now that the Europeans are not Christian, the ethnocentrism of the European has reversed itself. The European people currently regard all European history that is unconnected to black history as irrelevant history.

The European Christian looks to the future in the expectation of the second coming of Christ, but he does not deify the future. In fact the genuine Christian, the European, is more likely to revere the past because in the past are the people who took Christ into their homes.

In contrast to the Christian European, the new age liberal European looks to a future where mankind lives together in an earthly paradise. The dreams of the Woodstock hippies will be realized in the future, mankind will advance to a new Garden of Eden. But is such a future an advance? What are the features of the liberals’ future utopia? The first thing one notes is that there is death in the liberals’ paradise. In Christian Europe death was swallowed up in Christ’s victory on the cross: “And Death once dead, there’s no more dying then.” The liberals’ utopian vision of death is opposed to the Christian vision. There is a huge difference between, “there’s no more dying then,” because Christ has conquered death and, “there’s no tragedy in death because the species lives on.” The second thing we notice is connected to our first observation. There is no Christ in the future. He is ominously absent from the futuristic fantasies of the liberals. The force is with us in the future, the Übermensch is with us, a whole assortment of Asian and African gods are also with us in the future, but the Son of Man is gone. And why not? If there is no sin, and death is only natural, why does mankind need redemption from sin and liberation from death? What mankind needs, the utopians tell us, is liberation from oppressive barriers of race, sex, and family. All utopias are biracial, sexually liberated, and opposed to the patriarchal family.

If we put the war between the utopian Europeans and the antique Europeans in the form of a fable, it would run something like this:

__________

Farmer Brown had a farm with the usual farmyard animals. He ran the farm with benevolence, but he did run it as a farm; the animals all had their duties and they were expected to perform their duties for the good of the barnyard community. In the woods lived a fox who had always been at enmity with Farmer Brown. Secretly and late at night the fox started to talk to the various animals on the farm. He talked to them about nature and about repression. It was unnatural for animals to live on a farm. They were meant to live free in the woods. And it was unnatural for animals to confine their sexual activity to only their own kind. Why shouldn’t the rooster mate with a dog, a cow with a goat, the lamb with the bull? Weren’t all animals part of nature? And wasn’t nature good? All this and more the fox poured into the ears of Farmer Brown’s animals, and in the end the animals, save one, left the farm for the promised revels in the woods.

The clever fox knew that it was not enough to get the animals into the woods. He had to keep them in the woods. And how could he keep them in the woods? The woods were miserable. The fox had learned just how miserable they were from years and years of exile from the farm where he had once lived as a special favorite of Farmer Brown. So again, how to keep them in the woods once they realized that endless sex with an assortment of other animals was not all that the fox had told them it would be?

First, the fox instilled in the animals a pathological fear of Farmer Brown. “Do you remember what it was like under Farmer Brown? Do you want to return to those days when Farmer Brown didn’t allow you to have unbridled sex with every species of animal?”

“I don’t actually recall life under Farmer Brown being that bad,” said one of the cows. “And I don’t really enjoy having relations with a pig.”

The pigs all snorted at the reactionary cow, and later that day the cow disappeared. After that the clever fox kept a whole contingent of weasels on his payroll. Their sole job was to keep their ears open and report any animal who spoke about returning to the farm. The animals that did speak about returning to the farm all disappeared like the disagreeable cow. Soon no animal spoke favorably about the farm, and most of the animals forgot there had ever been a Farmer Brown or a farm.

The third phase of the fox’s plan was “the appeal to their intellectual pride” plan. “No intelligent animal believes in farms or Farmer Brown. We are building here in the woods a new world that is constantly getting better and better. I have no doubt that we will soon have a perfect world here if only we eliminate reactionary animals who talk rot about a mythical farm and a mythical man who runs the farm. My research staff, consisting of some wise old owls and a super intelligent German shepherd, are constantly studying and doing research in order to make your world the most perfect of worlds.” The animals were very impressed.

Still, despite all his efforts, the fox saw that all was not well. Something was missing in utopia. Because he had not forgotten Farmer Brown and the farm, he knew what was missing – a flesh and blood symbol of the new utopian regime of the animals. The new order stood for pleasure, unity, and peace, but who could be the flesh and blood symbol of pleasure, unity, and peace? The wolf, of course. The barnyard animals had always been taught to fear the wolf, but this was a prejudice, the fox told them. Wolves were natural, wolves were vital, wolves were untainted with the selfishness and petty bourgeois values of the farmyard. So the wolf became the sign and symbol of the new utopia. At every gathering the animals sang hymns to the sacred wolf. In work and play wolves were the centerpiece of the new society. At the campfires at night, the scholarly owls would read long tomes telling how the wolves had been mistreated and discriminated against in the bad old days of the farms. Now in the golden age, in the age of the new, enlightened farmyard animals, the wolf was honored as the sacred god of the farmyard animals. But of course a wolf is still a wolf, despite what the owlish scholars say to the contrary. What happened when the wolves behaved like wolves and killed three pigs, two cows, and five little lambs? The owls condemned the goat who reported the slaughter — “You reactionary old goat” – and threw the goat into prison for five years. Then, for good measure, they burned down the goat’s modest dwelling and sent his wife and their kids to a retraining center where the kids were taught the evil of their father and the goodness of wolves.

So all seemed well for the fox; his kingdom was in order. But the fox was not happy. There were rumors of an old farm cat named George, who had remained loyal to Farmer Brown. George held meetings in the forest at which he told some of the new age animals about the real Farmer Brown and life on a real farm. The former farm animals seemed interested, but they never committed themselves to George and the old farm. “All quite amusing, those stories about the old farm, but you can’t build a life on fairy tales,” the old donkey declared.

“How would I make a living if I followed the cat? I’d be marginalized,” the ram asserted. “Stuff and nonsense,” the wise old owl declared.

“Why haven’t you killed the cat?” the fox asked his weasels.

“Because he never meets in the same place twice and he can still run faster than any of the other animals. Besides that, he is a crafty old fellow.”

“I don’t want excuses. Find that Farmer Brown loyalist and kill him! That’s an order!”

And there we leave the new age farmyard animals, in the woods with the fox. But George still lives, and it seems, if the weasels can be believed, that George is growing younger, larger, and stronger. Soon, the fox fears, George will descend upon the forest, destroy the Fox’s minions, and lead the rest of the farmyard animals back to the farm. ‘Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished.

__________

Modern Liberaldom is supposed to be heaven on earth; haven’t the liberals told us that is what we could expect once they were in power? So why haven’t we become stardust and golden? Because of me and thee. The reactionaries, the recalcitrants, are impeding the final implementation of paradise. And so it will go on until Liberaldom is destroyed. Paradise will always be just around the corner once the last racists, the last sexists, are finally eliminated from the face of the earth. We can never be at peace with the liberals because the liberals must destroy the white race in order to ensure the survival of their utopia. The liberals’ assertion that skin color has nothing to do with the spiritual identity of a man turns into a lie as soon as the liberals place the black man at the center of their altars. If skin color has nothing to do with a man’s essential soul, then why do the liberals worship the black man? Shouldn’t they be color blind? Why is all good ascribed to blacks simply on the basis of their color if skin color is of no consequence? In point of fact, our skin color is a thing eternal; it is part of our soul. And white souls, of a bygone era, consecrated their hearts and minds to Christ. The liberal must condemn that by-gone era and condemn the people of that era in order to build Satandom on the ruins of Christendom.

From a utopian viewpoint, antique Europeans are always in the wrong because they were not perfect. But why are liberals, who condemn antique Europeans for the mites in their eyes, never condemned for the logs in their own eyes? The liberals stand condemned not only by their own standards, in that they have failed to usher in utopia, but also by Christian standards. They have instituted Satanic values throughout the European countries by placing the black man on the altars of the formerly Christian churches. We cannot vote such a blasphemy away because all of the democratic governments of the European people only allow the European people to vote for the person that is to be in charge of the ongoing liquidation of the European people. There are no elections being held where one can vote for the survival of the white race. That issue was never put on the ballot because utopians are tyrannical. The predetermined condition for the building of utopia is the destruction of the Christ-bearing people. So why would the tyrants of Liberaldom treat the necessity of the extermination of the white race as a debatable issue? It is not a debatable issue to them. Whites must perish if Liberaldom is to survive. Liberaldom won’t survive if Europeans behave like white men who are fully conscious that their whiteness is part of their soul, which belongs to God and is not meant to perish in a racially mixed Babylonian stewpot or in the cosmic wastes of Liberaldom. “Still our ancient foe does seek to work us woe,” but Christ, not Satan, is the God of our race, and He wills that we should fight for our kith and kin with a passion and a love that passeth the understanding of the liberal and the barbarian. They who have not faith, who have not hope, who have not charity, will never impose their utopia of death on we few, the Europeans who refuse to abandon His Europe and His people. +

Posted in Blood faith, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization, White Genocide | Tagged | Comments Off on The Bottomless Pit of Diversity