Most Barbarous, Most Degenerate Liberalism!

Posted on July 21, 2018 by cwny

It will come
Humanity must perforce prey on itself
Like monsters of the deep.

—King Lear

__________

We state the obvious when we say that the liberals’ feigned outrage over Trump’s meeting with Putin is simply another manifestation of their hatred of Trump. But this clash between Trump and the liberals is not a clash of opposing ideologies, it is internecine warfare. Mad-dog liberalism is the malevolent offspring of classical liberalism. The mad-dog liberals view Trump, the classical liberal, as the parent who is trying to take them back to the bad old days when they had to ask for the car keys and return home by a specified time. Such restraints are unbearable, — they must have no restraints. And since they are malevolent offspring, they will stop at nothing, not even murder, in order to avoid any restraints on their appetites.

The reason Trump feels closer to leaders such as Putin and Orbán is that those leaders represent nations much higher up on the slippery slope of liberalism. Those nations will descend into mad-dog liberalism if they do not reject democracy, but they are currently at the first stage of the democratic cancer, the stage when the inner ugliness cannot be seen by the outward eye. Our society, which is in the final stage, can be seen in all its inner ugliness; there is no longer a healthy looking outward veneer.

It must be said of Trump that he is a better man than all his Republican predecessors. He has kept his word on the abortion issue, and he is trying to keep his word on open borders. But the liberals needn’t worry – you can’t return to classical liberalism once you have made the descent into mad-dog liberalism. Our entire culture is one vast indoctrination network for mad-dog liberalism. The mad-dog liberals control the schools, the churches, and the media. How can anything good, by which I mean Christian, come to fruition in such a culture? Nothing good will come out of any culture conceived and born of liberalism. It is not only mad-dog liberalism that we must oppose, we must also reject classical liberalism despite the fact that classical liberalism seems benign, just as cancer in its early stages seems benign, because classical liberalism leads to mad-dog liberalism.

The people of Europe have never come to terms with liberalism, which was revealed in its purest form during the French Revolution. The mad-dog liberals such as Priestly, Price, and later, men like Belloc, accepted and lauded the French Revolution in its most horrific manifestation under Robespierre. The classical liberals rejected Robespierres’ Jacobinism for a modified Jacobinism, a liberal mixture of the old world and the new utopian world. But there can be no compromise with liberalism. It is a devouring, reptilian monster that must prey on humanity like a monster from the deep. And it will devour even its own children. Robespierre devoured his fellow Jacobins, just as the modern European Jacobins are devouring each other.

Even great Christ-haters like Voltaire and Shaw understood that you could not discuss any important issue having to do with the European people without reference to Christianity. Albeit the likes of Shaw and Voltaire knew Christianity had to be discussed in order to purge it from the face of the earth, but they did know it had to be dealt with. ‘Tis not so with the modern Europeans. Even professed Christians act like everything of importance can be handled without reference to Christianity. This cannot be – we are all born of Christian Europe. All the good that is left in modern Europe, and there is very little good left, comes from Christian Europe. And all that is bad in modern Europe, which is practically everything, stems from the European peoples’ acceptance of a false Christianity opposed to European Christianity.

In Miracle on 34th Street, Fred Gailey, the intrepid, kind-hearted defender of Kris Kringle, states that he intends to prove that Kris Kringle is the one and only Santa Claus. It is my contention, and shall always be my contention, that at the poetical core of the European people is the one, true God, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I cannot present mathematical proof of my contention, but I do not regard mathematical proof as genuine proof in spiritual matters. I ask you to look through, not with, the eye and see life as the physically blind, but not morally blind Gloucester sees life: “I see it feelingly.” All great hearts can see the European silken thread that leads to the Savior. But we must have the desire to follow that thread to its source, rejecting all other false threads that lead us astray.

I would use the term ‘mystical’ to describe the European thread that leads to Christ, but the term ‘mystical’ has been mightily abused. It has been and still is used to describe rational systems of thought stemming from the minds of Buddhist monks and Christian theologians. So let me substitute the term ‘poetic’ for ‘mystical’. Once having cleared that hurdle, we can proceed with the defense of European Christianity.

The demise of the European people has come about because theological Christianity, which always was a fierce rival of poetical Christianity, has completely routed poetical Christianity. Martha, who “was careful and troubled about many things,” was not gently rebuked because she was doing kitchen work, she was rebuked because she had lost sight of what all work, including kitchen work, was for. The theological man, the man tinctured with the pride of science, puts God in a box, ‘out there’ – He is a geometrical given – and then proceeds to get down to business. But if God is not in human hearts, if we cannot know Him through that organ, which St. Paul and the European poets insist is the organ of sight, then how can we know our business? How can we know the living God? Suppose a child is brought up in a home in which the mother and father separated at the child’s birth, and the mother has custody of the child while the father has no visitation rights. What will be the child’s conception of the father? It might be a good one if the mother chooses to portray the father in a good light, but it is more than likely the mother will portray the father in a bad light. But good or bad, the child’s conception of the father will be only an intellectual construct. He will not have any intimate, heart-to-heart contact with his father. That is what we get when we embrace theological Christianity. We have no contact with the heart of God, we only know Him through an intellectual process, which may lead us to think kindly of God, as the classical liberals do, or it may lead us to hate God, as the mad-dog liberals do, but in both forms of liberalism there is no contact with the living God, the God who enters human hearts.

The first liberal was the devil; he successfully got Adam and Eve to break their ties to a loving, personal God in order to establish a business relationship with an impersonal, natural force that was above and beyond God. They believed in Albert Einstein’s cosmic religion billions of years before the great Einstein ‘discovered’ it. Christ delivered us from the bondage of the devil’s cosmic religion through His death on the cross, but the price of our deliverance was and is that we take up our cross and follow Christ. St. Paul stresses that we must share in Christ’s crucifixion if we are to share in His resurrection. And that Pauline assertion, that the fruits of Christ’s resurrection can only be gained by sharing in His crucifixion, was the weapon Satan used to bring the Europeans back to a cosmic nature religion, which places them in the devil’s fold.

Through the medium of theology, the devil got the European people back to nature and to nature’s gods. He used the medium of theology at the beginning of his attack, because he saw that a frontal attack was hopeless. If we look at the work of St. Thomas Aquinas, for instance, we do not see a denial of the Christian God. Far from it, we see an intellectual affirmation of the triune God. But is that God the same God the apostles encountered on the road to Emmaus, the God who made their hearts burn within them? Is it the same God that St. Paul encountered on the road to Damascus? No, it is not. Aquinas placed God outside of man; He was to be found by reason’s contemplation of the natural world. Aquinas is generally considered the optimist and Calvin the pessimist, because Calvin insisted on the doctrine of total depravity while Aquinas claimed that our reason was untainted by original sin. But what both theologians have in common is that they rejected the poetic core of the Christian faith. St. Paul insisted that there was an indwelling spirit in the human heart through which a man could develop an intimacy with Christ. And that intimacy was not an ecstatic union with a pagan deity, it was a moral union of hearts. The European people followed St. Paul’s injunction to circumcise their hearts, and by doing so they joined their hearts to His sacred heart. This was the miracle of European culture, that the European people responded to God’s grace. Only a Christian who thinks dogmatic theology and religious faith are one and the same would allow the external history of the European people – their wars, their lusts, and their quests for the treasures of this world only – to blind him to the incredible moral beauty of Christian Europe. Why is Christian Europe and her people judged by her trash bins and not by her poetic essence?

The European bards such as Shakespeare, Scott, and Dickens, are one with the apostles in their vision of the European inn at Emmaus. It is there that our hearts burn within us in the presence of the risen Lord. And even the atheist poets, the Byrons and the Shelleys, knew who the enemy of their beloved cosmic religion was. It was the men and women with hearts of flesh who rejected the gods of nature for the God above nature.

The wheel has come full circle; the European people have returned to nature and nature’s gods. They could not live with a rational God who disdained to enter human hearts, the God of the rationalist theologians and the classical liberals. It is not possible to defeat the mad-dog liberals by referring to classical liberalism: “Let me show you how irrational your policies are.” That doesn’t work. The mad-dog liberals are being rational – they use their reason to destroy what they hate, white Christian Europe. The Tucker Carlsons and the Paul Joseph Watsons, the classical liberals, can point out the hypocrisy and irrationality of the liberals from now to doomsday, but they will never deflect the mad-dog liberals from their maniacal assault on the white race. Nor will the white grazers ever pick up the mantle of white Christian Europe and fight for England, Harry, and St. George. They will continue to appease the mad-dog liberals by declaring, from under their beds, that they are not racist. Is that the sum total of the white man’s existence in the 21st century? Yes, it is. Does it have to be? No, it doesn’t. There is that poetical-mystical connection to God that St. Paul writes about in 1 Corinthians 13. If our apostle, St. Paul, was right then we can reconnect with the living God through white pietas. And once that reconnection is made, Europe will become Europe again and her people will no longer plead for a small corner in Liberaldom. They will demand that Christ be reinstated as the King of the European people. Certainly, it is not written that the European people will return to the poetic-mystic faith of St. Paul. But it is not written that they won’t. Christian Europe was a miracle of God’s grace; it serves as a sign of contradiction to those who tell us that God does not enter human hearts. He can and He will come to us, if we come to Him with hearts of flesh warmed and nurtured at our racial hearth fire. +

Posted in Democracy, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged | Comments Off on Most Barbarous, Most Degenerate Liberalism!

The Young Drummer and the Good Samaritan

Posted on July 14, 2018 by cwny

Yet this in no wise alters the fact that those who form no more than a part of a universal mish-mash, of a homeless multitude of faceless ‘un-men’, will never have any pride of place or sense of belonging, nor will ever know the Christian virtues of charity and love. Love like charity not only begins at home but perishes without one.              

-Anthony Jacob in White Man, Think Again!

_____

On the instant stood revealed, as though he had blown down the ages, a pure Goth, unchanged in any essential since his fathers had left their forests, and through all obstacles, even through ranks of Roman legionaries, sword in hand, had hewn their way straight to the goal of their desires. He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart—a Goth.   

-Thomas Nelson Page in Under the Crust

__________

Pope Francis the blasphemer has been up to his usual hijinks again. This time he has blasphemed by invoking the parable of the Good Samaritan in order to attack white pietas. He tells us that the Good Samaritan “did not ask for documents” before helping the man who had been beaten by thieves. Of course he is placing the Moslems and colored invaders in the position of the “certain man” who was beaten and robbed on the way to Jerusalem. And he is placing white people in the position of the priest and the Levite who “passed by on the other side.”

I think it is best, from a prudential standpoint, to confine your intense hatreds to men and/or women who are already dead. That way you stay out of jail, because it’s not illegal to strangle, in your imagination, an enemy who is already dead. And for many years I have hated dead men more than any living man. At the top of my list is George Bernard Shaw. He will probably always be at the top of my list, but in recent years two rivals for the top spot have appeared. One is Angela Merkel and the other is Pope Francis the blasphemer. I’m sure there are others, a legion of others, who share the same views as the Merkel Monster and Francis the blasphemer, but those two have used their positions of authority to attack the living God by destroying His image in man. And I hate them for it, with all my heart, mind, and soul. Let me now turn these blog pages over to the Young Drummer from Grimm’s fairy tales. What follows is an interview he did this week with the Good Samaritan.

__________________________________

Young Drummer: Your name has been invoked a lot lately, invoked as a justification for what I consider to be vicious attacks on the body of Christ. What do you think of the people who have invoked your name for liberal causes?

Good Samaritan: I hate them. Attacks on the dead, and these people who willfully distort my story for their own selfish ends are attacking me, are usually successful because the dead are not there to defend themselves.

YD: I’m here to allow you to defend yourself.

GS: I thank you. When our Lord told my story, He was responding to a lawyer who “tempted Him.” The lawyer wanted to know what he had to do to inherit eternal life. Of course we realize that the lawyer really didn’t think Christ could teach him, a lawyer, anything. After all, Christ was merely a carpenter’s son, and the lawyer was a doctor of the law. But Christ responded to the lawyer for the sake of others who were listening. Let me quote the whole sequence of events:

And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?

What ensues next is my story. I needn’t quote it again; I’m sure all your readers are familiar with it.

YD: That’s not always true in this, the 21st century. So let me tell your story:

And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

GS: Now that the stage is set, let me quote from the great Bard of Avon:

Mark you this, Bassanio,
The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.
An evil soul producing holy witness
Is like a villain with a smiling cheek,
A goodly apple rotten at the heart.
O, what a goodly outside falsehood hath!

In my judgement Francis the blasphemer is quoting Holy Scripture in order to facilitate the reign of Satan and destroy Christ’s reign of charity. Let me explain. First, our Lord was telling us, through my story, that our neighbor is our fellow man. We are not to extend charity exclusively to those who live next door to us or exclusively to our kin. But where in the parable does our Lord tell us to invite strangers into our homes and our nations, strangers who have demonstrated murderous and licentious appetites, in order to prey upon our wives, our children, and our people?

Secondly, I did not take the stranger who was beaten on the road into my home. I took him to an inn. I had no reason to believe that the stranger on the road was a rapist or a murderer. Had I thought he was, I would have turned him over to the law, I would not have taken him to an inn. The so-called men of God who give sanctuary to Moslem, Mexican, and black criminals are defending the robbers who assaulted the traveler on the road, which is the complete opposite of what I did. The white people being beaten, raped, and murdered by Merkel’s and Pope Francis’s noble savages are the travelers on the road who need someone to show charity toward them. Merkel the Levite and Francis the Priest “have passed by on the other side” in order to cozy up to the Prince of Darkness by helping his minions destroy the white race.

YD: The devil’s assault on our Lord has centered on the destruction of the European hearth fire, because it was there that the European people came to love Him in and through their own people.

GS: Precisely. “Love, like charity, begins at home, but perishes without one.” I only extended charity to the traveler on the road because I learned charity at home, amongst my kith and kin. If I had no kith and kin, if my heart were dead to all feelings of filial devotion and love of my own people, then I would have killed the stranger on the road.

TD: Amen to that. This constant assault on white pietas can only lead all mankind to the fiery pit.

GS: That’s right. But there is another reality that neither Angela Merkel nor Pope Francis know of. There is the reality of the Christian European hearth fire. It is there that hearts of flesh encounter the same Lord and Savior that the apostles encountered on the Road to Emmaus. Christ will always be with us so long as we stay by our European hearth fire.

YD: God keep you, my Good Samaritan friend.

GS: And God keep you.

Post Script from the Young Drummer:

I do not look on modern Europe from an Olympian height, because I am not an Olympian. I am born of Europe; when Europe bleeds, I bleed. And Europe is bleeding now, because the European people have lost their prophetic vision that came to them when they made Christ Jesus the sovereign King of Europe. Now, when Christ has been placed in a Gnostic box outside of Europe, when He no longer occupies a place at the Europeans’ hearth fire, the European people have become mere recorders that can be played upon by Satan. The European people desperately need to reclaim their souls by reconnecting with my Europe, which is the Europe of faith, hope, and charity. It is not given to me to know the day and hour of His return. But He has given me a vision of a love that passeth the understanding of the rational mind. That vision is the sacred heritage of the European people. They have forsaken that heritage. Why? “Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more” until Liberaldom is dust.

______________________________

The two entities, the eternal Europe of the Young Drummer, and the Gospel of Christ in which we learn of the Good Samaritan, became one incorporate union during the Christian era of the European people’s history. It was the task of the secular utopians, such as Robespierre, Marx, Trotsky, and Jefferson, to destroy that incorporate union in the name of a glorious new future for mankind, devoid of the evils and imperfections of Christian Europe. And it was the task of Christian utopians such as Hilaire Belloc, Teilhard de Chardin, and Pope Francis to join with the liberals in the destruction of Christian Europe. And what does the new Europe, purged of the imperfections of the antique Europeans, look like? It looks like hell. We no longer see men and women trying to unite their passion to His passion. Instead we see men and women who have nothing inside them but a passionate hatred for their own people and a passionate hatred for the Christ of old Europe.

If Christ be not risen then we most certainly should not make Him the cornerstone of our civilization. But if Christ rose from the dead on the third day, shouldn’t we, in all the essentials, want to follow Him in the footsteps of the people who believed in the risen Lord? The liberals have built Liberaldom on the premise that Christ did not rise from the dead, that He was a fraud. We are facing a spiritual Rubicon. Either we stay on the European side of the river with the Europeans from long ago, or we must cross over to the liberals’ side of the river with Angela Merkel and Pope Francis and denounce our ‘racist’ ancestors, while doing penance for our irredeemable whiteness.

The great majority of Europeans are trying to survive the liberals’ onslaught on the white race by denouncing the antique Europeans and agreeing to do penance for the sin of whiteness. Witness all the ‘white privilege’ courses that are being taught at the European and American universities. But if the passion of men united to Christ through white pietas is replaced by the ‘wisdom’ of philosophers determined to build a utopian world based on the doctrine that everything from white Christian Europe was evil and everything opposed to white Christian Europe is good, then the European people will cease to exist, because we cannot live without the vision that they, the condemned and despised antique Europeans, bequeathed to us. Noble hearts do not forget their dead, especially when their honored dead left them with a memory more precious than gold. “If I forget thee, O Jerusalem” is how we must feel about Christian Europe. We shall keep the memory alive because He lives there, He does not dwell in Liberaldom.

For me, the whole conflict between the Young Drummer-Good Samaritan world and the Angela Merkel-Pope Francis world is summed up in Luke:

While he yet spake, there cometh one from the ruler of the synagogue’s house, saying to him, Thy daughter is dead; trouble not the Master. But when Jesus heard it, he answered him, saying, Fear not: believe only, and she shall be made whole. And when he came into the house, he suffered no man to go in, save Peter, and James, and John, and the father and the mother of the maiden. And all wept, and bewailed her: but he said, Weep not; she is not dead, but sleepeth. And they laughed him to scorn, knowing that she was dead. And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid, arise. And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway: and he commanded to give her meat. And her parents were astonished: but he charged them that they should tell no man what was done.

The key passage is, “And they laughed him to scorn, knowing that she was dead.” The Rousseaus, the Voltaires, the Shaws, the Einsteins, and all the anti-European legion of European intellectuals who worship science and the noble savage treat Christ with scorn. “The dead do not rise,” is their constant refrain. And the Merkels and the Pope Francises have joined the mockers rather than take a stand with the ‘racist’ Europeans. As for me and my house, we will stand with the antique Europeans who did not mock Christ. They believed that Christ delivered Jairus’s daughter from the bonds of death just as He will deliver us from death at the appointed time. How can any European ever, having been vouchsafed a vision of the living God, settle for the liberals’ ‘potage-of-lentils’ culture of diversity? We can’t and we won’t. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Europeans and Christ, Fairy tale mode of understanding, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Pietas, Sanhedrin Christianity, Young Drummer | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Young Drummer and the Good Samaritan

The Great Mystery

Posted on July 7, 2018 by cwny

Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.– 1 Corinthians 15: 51-52

__________

More often than not the movie version of a novel is not as good as the original novel. But there are exceptions. Walt Disney’s movie Mary Poppins (1964) is better than the books, Disney’s Swiss Family Robinson (1960) is better than the book, and Disney’s retelling of the Pinocchio story (1940) is infinitely superior to the book. Are there other movies, outside of the Walt Disney canon, that are superior to the novel on which they were based? Yes, there are. John Ford’s The Searchers is superior to the novel of the same name. And John Ford’s How Green Was My Valley is superior to the novel. It is on the latter movie-novel that I want to dwell.

I first saw the movie How Green Was My Valley in my late teens. Later in my mid-twenties, I read the novel it was based on. I loved the movie, and I hated the book. Why? I loved the movie because Ford placed the emphasis on the Christian father of the family and left out the atheistic, existential rants of the author-narrator that permeated the book. In one telling incident in the book, the narrator informs us that Christ’s crucifixion can only have significance if Christ was not God, because if He was God His suffering on the cross was not real. Isn’t that the overlooked heresy of our age, the denial of the humanity of God? If God was truly God and truly man, wasn’t His suffering on the cross infinitely greater than ours? He could have stopped His suffering at any time, but He didn’t. Why didn’t He stop it? The mockers told Him to come down off the cross and they would believe. And that is precisely what Christ did not want. He did not want the fear and respect of sycophants who only bow down to power and might. He wanted the freely given love of men who believed in a God of charity and mercy.

To deny the humanity of Christ is to deny His divinity as well, because Christ is the God-Man; His humanity is an inseparable part of His divinity. Intellectuals such as Einstein, who were legion in the 20th century, said there were three categories of religion. The first category was that of the primitive religions of totem and superstition, the second was of the more ethical religions of monotheism, which still retained some elements of the primitive religions, and the third was the cosmic religion of exceptional men such as Einstein himself. But Einstein and his liberal brethren were wrong. Einstein’s ‘higher cosmic religion’ was in reality a return to the primitive religions of totem, superstition, and magic. And the tragedy of 20th and 21st century Christianity was and is that the churchmen, under the scientistic influence of men like Einstein, Shaw, and Teilhard de Chardin, blended Christianity with cosmic nature worship. And that blending of cosmic naturalism and Christianity made modern Christianity more compatible with Islam, Judaism, Liberalism, and all the nature religions than it did with the Christian faith of the antique Europeans. How could it be otherwise? Adherents of rationalized nature religions cannot understand the religion of the God-Man, because God-Manhood can only be understood by the poetic heart, it cannot be understood by the science/magic-oriented mind.

The men of Europe must come to see that their science-based culture is not an advance, it is a regression to the primitive religions of nature. The African witch doctor and the white scientist are one in spirit just as the Russian communist and the American capitalist are one in spirit. The capitalist can deliver more of the economic goods than the communist, just as the white scientist can more efficiently deal with natural diseases, but the white scientists and the black witch doctor are of the same nature/magic-based faith. All faiths, save one, are nature/magic-based faiths. Islam and Judaism are no different in kind from the more primitive type of snake-charmer religions.

Now we come to the ‘save one’ faith. The God-Manhood of Christ defies nature. Christ’s magic is not derived from nature. His magic is of the spirit; it consists of His divine humanity. The love that surpasses the understanding of the natural mind has been discarded by the scientized men and women of the 21st century. If love cannot be put in a scientized golden bowl, then it does not exist: That is the conclusion of our science/magic-based culture.

After over a century of listening to the Christian theologians’ new version of the naturalized Christianity, the Europeans have lost their filial love for their Lord and kinsmen. Is it possible we have forgotten what He did and what His God-Manhood means? Ponder, just for a moment, the faith that Christ had in His people. He came to His people, not as a conquering God of power and might, but as the suffering servant who was destined to face an ignominious death on the cross. How could a rational God expect a rational-minded people to accept a God who acted thus as their Savior? It was the bold, audacious act of a madman, it could not be the act of a God. Or could it? The bulk of mankind has told us that it was not the act of a God. Only one people, as a people, said that the Man on the cross was the Son of God. They believed in His God-Manhood. And because of their belief in His God-Manhood, they believed in themselves as a people. If He comes to us through His divine humanity, then it must mean we come to Him through our humanity. In the cosmic nature religion of the liberals, our stubborn fidelity to our kith and kin marks us as heretics, because nature is one, holy, and universal; it does not recognize the individual person who loves a particular people and a particular God that are not derivatives of nature.

The socialist hard left in the United States is currently at odds with the socialist ‘soft’ left; they differ in degree, not in kind. The hard left in Jacobin France wanted to kill Louis XVI immediately, while the more pragmatic left wanted to keep him around as a puppet king in order to give the people time to get used to the idea of the execution of their king and the destruction of Christian France. So it is with the disputes among the left in this country today. The hard left wants the death of everything white and Christian immediately, while the soft left wants to go a little slower. And in America there is no right-wing that wants to destroy the left, there are only the Republicans who want to go a little slower still than the soft left. Is there any elected official in any European country that has even suggested, let alone actually tried to act on that suggestion, that we criminalize liberalism and return to the faith-based cultures that existed in Europe prior to the American Revolution, the French Revolution, and the democratic revolutions of the mid-1800s? No, there isn’t.

We must see ourselves as in a perpetual state of war against the culture of democracy, even if it is called a Christian democracy, because at the core of democracy is Satan’s kingdom of eternal night. At first his sneering face is camouflaged in patriotic platitudes about the people and their freedoms, but once the people have been separated from the ‘Dream of the Rood’-culture of old Europe for a long period of time, the camouflage can be dispensed with and Satan can walk the streets of Europe undisguised. The German councilwoman who flat out told her co-legislators that Germany would be a Moslem country in twenty years represents the moral essence of the new Europe, the Satanic Europe, that must be opposed with our whole heart, mind, and soul. It’s not a pleasant thing to be in a constant state of war, but it is certainly better than being in a constant state of peace with the people who have eradicated our culture, blasphemed against our God, and seek the life-blood of our kith and kin. Of course if you believe that the antique Europeans were evil racists, that their God was a false God, and that there is no such thing as white pietas, then you will not make war against the liberals. You will play politics with them and try to get them to see that you have been redeemed — you are not racist like those hideous creatures from long ago.

Dostoevsky’s Underground Man said that a man lives his whole life to prove he is not a piano key. Hamlet told Rosencrantz and Guildenstern that he was not a mere recorder on which they could play in order to pluck out his mystery. The liberals, who have rejected the God-Man and made the man-god, the natural savage, their god, believe that a man can be played upon as if he were a piano key or a recorder. They, the magic-nature men, tell us that they have solved the mystery of man. Man is a glorious ape subject to the laws of the natural world. The God-Manhood of Christ is a myth, but the deified ape is a reality. But a post-Christian people will always retain some elements of Christianity; that is why all apes are not equal. The white apes are not equal to the colored apes because they are from the devil; and that is the contradiction at the heart of liberalism. How can white racists be from the devil if there is no spiritual significance connected to skin color and no such thing as the devil?

The pagan Greek philosophers went as far as the human mind could go by the contemplation of nature. And what was their verdict? Sophocles rendered the verdict in his masterpiece, Oedipus Rex: “Better not to have been born.” If we are mere products of the natural world, if that is our mystery, then it is better not to have been born, and Christians who believe in the God-Man who rose from the dead, “are of all men most miserable.” The modern European has forsaken his mysterious human relationships with his kith and kin and his relationship with the God-Man in order to find comfort with the nature gods – with the negro, with the natural pagan religions of Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism or an ecumenical combination of all the ‘natural’ religions. There is no real mystery to any of those religions. Just go to any graveyard and stare at a human skull, as Hamlet did. But what if there is a greater mystery in death than the liberals can conceive of? What if Christ is “the grave where buried love doth live”? What the philosophers could not conceive of in their contemplation of the natural world, that the God-Man would deliver mankind from the bondage of death through His death on the Holy Rood, was and is the true mystery of existence that our people, the people who loved much, bore witness to. We will be forever in the thralldom of nature worship if we do not seek the God-Man in and through our kith and kin. Christ’s humanity does not diminish His divinity, just as our connection to our kith and kin does not diminish our humanity; it deepens it and allows us to understand, in our hearts, the mystery of Christ’s God-Manhood. +

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Jacobinism, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Scientism, White Genocide | Tagged | Comments Off on The Great Mystery

Where Two or Three Are Gathered Together

Posted on June 30, 2018 by cwny

“No, I suppose that other world must be all a dream.”

“There never was such a world,” said the Witch.

“No,” said Jill and Scrubb, “never was such a world.”

“There never was any world but mine,” said the Witch.

“There never was any world but yours,” said they.

Puddleglum was still fighting hard. “I don’t know rightly what you all mean by a world,” he said, talking like a man who hasn’t enough air. “But you can play that fiddle till your fingers drop off, and still you won’t make me forget Narnia; and the whole Overworld too. We’ll never see it again, I shouldn’t wonder. You may have blotted it out and turned it dark like this, for all I know. Nothing more likely. But I know I was there once. I’ve seen the sky full of stars. I’ve seen the sun coming up out of the sea of a morning and sinking behind the mountains at night. And I’ve seen him up in the midday sky when I couldn’t look at him for brightness.”

Puddleglum’s words had a very rousing effect. The other three all breathed again and looked at one another like people newly awaked.

“Why, there it is!” cried the Prince. “Of course! The blessing of Aslan upon this honest Marshwiggle. We have all been dreaming, these last few minutes. How could we have forgotten it? Of course we’ve all seen the sun.”

–The Silver Chair

__________

In order for a revolution to succeed, there must be a certain degree of passivity in the governing body responsible for preventing revolutions. The French Revolution was the classic example. The popular press, the pamphleteers, had made an impression upon Louis XVI; he thought that he could concede a few points to the Jacobins. But you can never cede anything to the devil. The king’s failure to see that the Jacobins were from the devil made him compromise when he should have stood firm.

The indulgence of a sort of undefined hope, an obscure confidence, that some lurking remains of virtue, some degree of shame, might exist in the breasts of the oppressors of France, has been among the causes which have helped to bring on the common ruin of king and people. There is no safety for honest men, but by believing all possible evil of evil men, and by acting with promptitude, decision, and steadiness on that belief. I well remember, at every epocha of this wonderful history, in every scene of this tragic business, that when your sophistic usurpers were laying down mischievous principles, and even applying them in direct resolutions, it was the fashion to say, that they never intended to execute those declarations in their rigour. This made men cautious to their opposition, and remiss in early precaution. By holding out this fallacious hope, the impostors deluded sometimes one description of men, and sometimes another, so that no means of resistance were provided against them, when they came to execute in cruelty what they had planned in fraud.

– Burke in A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

Louis XVI’s failure has been the failure of the West: We have failed to see the devil’s sneering face behind the façade of liberalism. And the primary cover of the devil’s agenda has been ‘racism.’ Trotsky coined the concept to neutralize the white race, and that terrible bogeyman has kept the white race in perpetual fear and self-loathing for over a century. Whites are willingly going to the liberals’ guillotine because they have come to believe that racism is the only unpardonable sin. They believe their ancestors were guilty of that unpardonable sin and they must atone for it. But how can you atone for an unpardonable sin? You can’t, but you can damn your ancestors. You can vow to have nothing to do with their legacy and you can spend your entire life as a sign of contradiction to old Europe. You can propitiate the colored gods by following the dictates of the high priests of the revolutionary tribunal. What gives the liberals the right to rule? Are they not white ‘racists’ just like thee and me? The liberals rule because they are the non-racist elect; they have made a Gnostic transformation and become pure spirit. And as Gnostic supermen they have decreed that everything that the racist Europeans thought was evil – sodomy, abortion, blasphemy – are really virtues that must be given state sanction. If you oppose any of those evils, you will be damned, because any opposition to liberalism is racist and racists are damned. So it is written, so it shall be.

The 20th century conservatives failed to put a dent in the liberals’ armor because they caved in to the liberals on the major issue, which was and still is, white pietas. The conservatives talked about defending our democratic traditions, and they wrote solemn tomes about defending our Greco-Roman-Christian heritage, but they never wrote about defending the people from whom we received our sacred heritage. If we do not have the same spirit as the antique Europeans we cannot preserve the civilization they bequeathed to us. That is fine with the liberals, because they believe the people of old Europe and the civilization they created were evil. But what about the conservatives who claim they want to preserve Western civilization while demonizing white pietas? It’s not possible. A man cannot conserve Western values while denouncing the people who created those values. You must either be a racist, a white man who loves his kith and kin, or you must be a liberal. There is no in between. By the 21st century, all conservatives were liberals, because they were afraid to be called racists.

In many ways, all bad, the new definition of sin suits the conservatives. They no longer have to worry about the old European honor code which required men to defend their women against the barbarians of color. That type of honor code died when racism emerged as the unpardonable sin. They no longer have to maintain any of the so-called pillars of society, such as the sanctity of life in the womb or the sanctity of Christian marriage. All things stemming from that charity of honor culture of old Europe can be done away with, allowing the conservatives time to work on what is really important – getting a non-racist white into office who will lower taxes and/or support our troops. But why are the troops “our troops”? Aren’t “our troops” members of the same military that Eisenhower sent to Little Rock, Arkansas to enforce integration at the point of a bayonet? And aren’t “our troops” the same troops that will be used against us should we dare to rise up and purge the black barbarians from our cities?

We are required, in this, the satanic phase of the Europeans’ history, to acquiesce passively to every form of liberal evil because to oppose liberalism is racist. That is quite a convenient formulation of the liberals. If all white people adhere to it, the liberals can reign until they die out from the black plague they created.

The act of kneeling is not intrinsically evil. In fact, to kneel in prayer to the Son of God is a great good. But should we kneel before the liberals and the liberals’ gods? The men who knelt in prayer to Christ, the ‘racist’ Europeans, would not have permitted the Moslem invasion of Europe, the daily rape and murder of whites at the hands of negro savages, the slaughter of the innocents, and the legalization of every form of sexual perversion. They would have felt honor bound to stop all the aforementioned practices. But that is the tragedy of the European people. They have rejected the honor code of old Europe because the antique Europeans were, according to the liberals, racist. If we continue to live without honor, we will surely perish.

It certainly seems rather hopeless for white people. They seem completely cowed by their fear of the racist label. The turning point came when the organized churches, first the Roman Catholic Church, and then the Protestant churches, went over to the worship of a universal idea of God rather than the worship of Christ the Savior. That resulted in the identification of the old European honor code with the ‘unpardonable sin’ code of the liberals.

There is an unbridgeable divide between the “Dream of the Rood” Christianity and modern Christianity. The former celebrates Christ our Savior, Christ our kinsman, while the later celebrates the God of the universal mind. The love of the Christ depicted in the “Dream of the Rood” creates a people who love their own in and through the Savior. A philosophical commitment to a generic, philosophical God creates a tepid, weak ‘love’ for all mankind, which leaves a void in the souls of men that can only be filled by the devil. “See how they love one another,” is the sign of the “Dream of the Rood” Christianity. “See how they hate their own,” is the sign of the liberal Christianity of the satanic, modern day, anti-Christian, Christian churches. There is no love, no honor, no God in those churches. Until the complete rejection of Satan’s new Christless, non-racist Christianity becomes the main thrust of the Europeans’ counterrevolution, there will be no salvation in this world or the next for the white Europeans, because the man who condemns his own in the name of a universal love for a non-existent, abstract people has no soul to call his own. “Breathes there a man with soul so dead…” Yes, the European people who fear the racist label have souls so dead.

We know what would make the European people whole again, but we do not know how that can happen. The European people need to love their own in and through the Savior. So long as they hate the ‘racist’ people who loved much, the European people will be estranged from God. Satan always attacks God through His people. If “the love that once was there” is no longer there, there can be no European restoration no matter who gets elected to political office.

Mark Antony’s speech to the Romans speaks to us as well, not as regards Caesar, but as regards our relationship to Christ:

You all did love him once, not without cause;
What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?

Our people once loved Christ, for what cause do we now regard Him as a lesser god in a pantheon of nature gods? Why do we regard Him as part of an “ecumenical jihad,” as the non-incarnate God of the nation state of Israel or as a special assistant to Nelson Mandela or to the people of the Amazon rain forest? We have relegated Christ to the status of a lesser nature god because there is no room in a man’s heart for the love of the living God if he is full of self-love. An overweening pride of intellect has consumed the European people and made them incapable of loving where they should love, and hating where they should hate. They should love the antique Europeans and the incarnate God with all their heart, mind, and soul. And they should hate the liberals and their god, the fallen archangel Satan, with all their heart, mind and soul.

After a century of indoctrination in school and church, the European people have descended to a state of post-Christian barbarism that makes mere pagan barbarism seem mild in comparison. The liberals can subject those who used to be their own people, before their Gnostic transformation, to torture, rape, and murder without the slightest “compunctious visitings” of conscience. There is no room for charity or mercy in men and women who are surfeit-swelled with self-love. How can anyone with a remnant of grace, the unbought grace of life, not vow to fight the liberals to the knife and drive them off the face of the earth?

St. Paul never talks about the enlightened mind, but he does talk constantly of the circumcised heart. The man who knew the dangers of the scientized intellect spent his life imploring people to open up their hearts to the Savior. Our people, the antique Europeans, did as St. Paul enjoined them. That civilization, the Europe of Christ incarnate, has passed away as a place on the map. But it still exists in the blood of the Europeans who, for the love of Him who died on the cross, have left the ‘pride of intellect’ civilization of the new Europe for the ‘hearth fire’ civilization of the old Europe. We are in the position of Puddleglum in C. S. Lewis’ book, The Silver Chair. Despite the fact that the Witch denies the existence of Narnia and his friends doubt the existence of Narnia, he asserts that there was and is a Narnia. So we must assert that there was and is a Christian Europe where men and women view life from His perspective. And we must defend that world, even if the apostate Europeans outnumber us by a million to one. If we look at life from the standpoint of pure math we are surely doomed. But when did the European hero ever take numbers into account? There is a realm of honor, that charity of honor, that sprang up from the hearts of the European people. That realm is not time bound nor is its reemergence among us dependent on a democratic majority. It depends on hearts that love their own in and through Him. Such things do not happen in a science-based culture, but they do happen when two or three European hearts are gathered together in His name. +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Halfway-house churches, Jacobinism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on Where Two or Three Are Gathered Together

He Hath Bourne Our Griefs

Posted on June 23, 2018 by cwny

Lo! I will declare the best of dreams which I dreamt in the middle of the night, when human creatures lay at rest. It seemed to me that I saw a wondrous tree rising aloft, encompassed with light, the brightest of crosses. All that sign was overlaid with gold; fair jewels were set at the surface of the earth; there were also five upon the cross-beam. All the angels of God, fair by creation, looked on there; verily that was no malefactor’s cross, but holy spirits gazed on Him there, men upon earth and all this glorious universe. – The Dream of the Rood

__________

I hate Shelley, Keats, and Byron with all my heart, mind, and soul. I hate them because they were anti-poets with a gift for words. They used their verbal skills to attack the poetical heart of existence. Keats spoke for the satanic triumvirate of anti-poets when he wrote, “Beauty is truth, truth beauty; — That is all, Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” Yes, there is an element of truth in Keats’ statement. But we must remember Banquo’s warning to Macbeth after both men faced the witches on the heath.

But ‘tis strange;
And oftentimes, to win us to our harm,
The instruments of darkness tell us truths,
Win us with honest trifles, to betray’s
In deepest consequence.

The honest trifle contained in Keats’ credo is that truth and beauty are connected. The lie at the center of Keats’ formulation is that beauty, and therefore truth, consists of the outward show. Keats and his fellow diabolists, Shelley and Byron, chose the same caskets of gold and silver that Bassanio rejected:

So may the outward shows be least themselves;
The world is still deceiv’d with ornament…
The seeming truth which cunning times put on
To entrap the wisest. Therefore, thou gaudy gold,
Hard food for Midas, I will none of thee;
Nor none of thee, thou pale and common drudge
‘Tween man and man; but thou, thou meagre lead,
Which rather threaten’st than dost promise aught,
Thy plainness moves me more than eloquence,
And here choose I. Joy be the consequence!

–Merchant of Venice

The problem with Keats, Shelley, and Byron is that they were mesmerized by the natural world. They made that world all in all. But the natural world only has significance as an outer symbol of the spiritual world within. The antique Europeans stood before the cross of Christ, the leaden casket of existence, and they saw that the inner substance was pure gold. The great Anglo Saxon poem, “The Dream of the Rood,” speaks to us still:

Wondrous was the cross of victory, and I, stained with sins, stricken with foulness;
I saw the glorious tree joyfully gleaming, adorned with garments, decked with gold; jewels had fitly covered the tree of the Lord.
Yet through that gold I could perceive the former strife of wretched men, that it had once bled on the right side.
I was all troubled with sorrows; I was full of fear at the fair sight.
I saw the changeful sign alter in garments and colours; at times it was bedewed with moisture, stained with the flowing of blood, at times adorned with treasure. (1)

Who saw that the bloody cross was also “adorned with garments, decked with gold?” Our people saw such a vision. That vision was and is the epitome of beauty and truth. It was the task of the great despoilers, the Shelleys, Keats, Byrons, Voltaires, and Rosseaus, to create a new beauty and a new truth. In the beginning of the onslaught, Satan’s minions were excellent counterfeiters. The anti-poetic triumvirate wrote well, and Voltaire and Rosseau could turn a clever phrase. But there is an incredible moral ugliness at the core of the anti-poetical poets such as Keats, Shelley, and Byron and the anti-Christian philosophers such as Voltaire and Rousseau. Subsequent generations of anti-poetical wordsmiths and anti-Christian philosophers have followed in their train, but they lack the verbal gifts and the cleverness of their satanic predecessors. Of course they no longer need verbal gifts or clever repartee any more. First evil is opposed, then when the evil doers will not go away without a fight, evil is tolerated. Then, over time, evil is embraced and becomes intertwined with the good until the good is blended out of existence like weeds blend the good fruits of the earth out of existence.

The European people live in Satan’s unweeded garden because they no longer see beauty and truth in the cross of Christ. They have been blinded by the glittering façade of modernity while failing to look behind the façade to the superficial rotten core of liberalism. What Karl Barth said of Feuerbach we must say of the liberals: We have heard them speak, and we have heard something that is disgustingly, nauseatingly trivial. We will always be the captives of the honest trifles, the disgustingly, nauseatingly evil trivialities of the devil, when we fail to see the cross of Christ as the penultimate of beauty and truth.

You can now get a Ph.D. without being able to write a complete sentence. And the average person speaks like Alfred Jingle, who spoke in broken phrases. Still, outside the black community, the general public is literate. They can read their cell phones and write in computer Jingle-ese. But there is a huge literacy crisis throughout the European nations. The European people have become culturally illiterate. They have lost all contact with the culture that was grounded in the cross of Christ. A few weeks ago I brought home a book purchased in one of the last remaining book stores in this area. The book was printed in 1911, and when I opened the book I found a program from a 1911 grammar school graduation ceremony tucked within the pages. The program revealed the incredible culture gap between us, the modern Europeans, and them, the antique Europeans. The grammar school grads wrote original poems:

May Foster –                     Queen June’s Arrival
Ruth Anderson –             To the Daisies
Joel Rosenthal –              Nature’s Art
Helen Soden –                  The Robin
Sylvan Marco —                Lincoln
Bertha Abendroth —       To a Meadow Lark
Pearl Smith —                   In the Forest
Jack Doron —                    Man’s Handiwork
Florence Campbell —      Farewell to Forestville

They performed a German play:

Die Doppelüberraschung
Herr Ewing —                      George Lederer
Fra Ewing —                        Marion Beveridge
Hertha —                              Naomi Proudfit
Bertha —                              Leona Proudfit
Bella —                                  Florence Seibert
Wanda —                             Annie Petersen

And they ended the graduation (obviously it was a German suburb) with a German folksong. All this from 8th graders! Three years after that 1911 graduation, the European people were destined to leave ancient Europe behind and start on the new road mapped out by the anti-European revolutionaries such as Shelley, Keats, Byron, and Rousseau. Now that we have had over one hundred years of that new European world, what is our judgement of it?

From the Christian standpoint there can be only one judgement of 20th and 21st century Europe. It must be condemned and rejected as we condemn and reject Satan. And yet the churchmen tell us that we must become one with the new Europe, the Europe that rejects the antique Europeans and their God. The Pope Francis-type Christians claim they are simply rejecting the racist past of the antique Europeans, they are not rejecting Christ. But that is a lie. Let us suppose that a rose can only grow in one type of soil. If you go throughout the world destroying that soil, haven’t you killed the rose? The European people were the good soil, in which the Christian rose, our Lord and Savior, came to fruition. What grows in the unweeded garden of Satan? Feminism, negro worship, abortion, sodomy, and blasphemy grow and flourish in Satan’s ‘Eden.’

The late Samuel Francis and John Tyndall were heroic men who wanted their kith and kin to survive in the white hating world. But they always saw white people as a changeless aggregate called white people. They did not see the Christian dynamic at work in the European people’s past and they did not see the anti-Christian dynamic at work in modern Europe. They kept saying that there was still time to democratically save the European people if they could be persuaded to vote white. Such logic does not take into account the fact that a liberal will never vote white. He will always side with the colored races because the colored races hate the white Christ-bearing race almost as much as the liberal hates the Christ-bearing race. And even if a white candidate wins an election (the Trump victory was perceived as a white populist victory as envisioned by Samuel Francis), if he does not look on his victory as the beginning of a return to old Europe, then the victory is a delaying action, it is not a victory. What are we as a people if we are not the people who dream of the Rood planted in the midst of Europe? There can be no blending of the two civilizations. In ancient Europe our people saw that the inner core of the bloody cross on which our Savior died was bedecked with jewels. In modern Europe, the liberals see a glittering casket of silver and gold, but when we open up that casket we behold the rotting corpse of Europe. The antique Europeans made much of that which was within; the modern Europeans worship the outer show that covers up the sickness within.

We cannot survive as a people unless we love our people when they were a people, a people who lived, loved, and hated within the shadow of the Holy Rood. What does it avail us if we wage democratic battles with the liberals in order to secure a place in Liberaldom? We can only win such battles by relinquishing our white souls; we must become white-hating liberals in order to enter Liberaldom. And what good is it to gain admittance to that world, the liberals’ world, if we must forfeit our souls to gain that world?

The two European worlds, the pre-20th century Europe and the 20th and 21st century Europe, are as different as heaven and hell. I frequently meet older grazers – my parents were two such grazers – who lament the passing of some European custom, such as Christian marriage, in which they believed. But the moment you tell such grazers that what they dislike is not an aberration of the democratic process, but is instead the natural consequence of the democratic process, you lose the grazers. They dismiss such wild-eyed attacks on the democratic way and go on complaining about the ‘aberrations’ while still worshipping democracy.

There are things being done in the name of democracy and diversity throughout the European nations that cry out to heaven for vengeance. No plea for mercy will stop the liberals from their merciless killing spree. Babies will continue to be aborted, and whites will continue to be slaughtered until white men decide to replant the Holy Rood of Christ in Europe’s green and pleasant land. Certainly whites should stockpile guns, but guns are useless without the will to use them in defense of what a man holds closest to his heart. What do we hold closest to our heart? I see the same vision as the author of “The Dream of the Rood”:

Then the young Hero – He was God almighty – firm and unflinching, stripped Himself;
He mounted on the high cross, brave in the sight of many, when He was minded to redeem mankind. Then I trembled when the Hero clasped me; yet I durst not bow to the earth, fall to the level of the ground, but I must needs stand firm. (1)

And we must needs stand firm. We won’t be part of the anti-civilization that exalts a man to the extent that he betrays Christ and His people. The foolishness of Christ, who was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities, must once again become our foolishness. We shall never die as individuals or as a people so long as our hearts remain with Him who died on the Holy Rood. +

__________________

(1) The Dream of the Rood

Lo! I will declare the best of dreams which I dreamt in the middle of the night, when human creatures lay at rest.
It seemed to me that I saw a wondrous tree rising aloft, encompassed with light, the brightest of crosses.
All that sign was overlaid with gold; fair jewels were set at the surface of the earth; there were also five upon the cross-beam.

All the angels of God, fair by creation, looked on there; verily that was no malefactor’s cross, but holy spirits gazed on Him there, men upon earth and all this glorious universe.
Wondrous was the cross of victory, and I, stained with sins, stricken with foulness;
I saw the glorious tree joyfully gleaming, adorned with garments, decked with gold; jewels had fitly covered the tree of the Lord.

Yet through that gold I could perceive the former strife of wretched men, that it had once bled on the right side.
I was all troubled with sorrows; I was full of fear at the fair sight.
I saw the changeful sign alter in garments and colours; at times it was bedewed with moisture, stained with the flowing of blood, at times adorned with treasure.
Yet I, lying there a long space, beheld in sorrow the Saviour’s cross, till I heard it speak.
Then the most excellent tree began to utter words:

‘Long ago was it – I still remember it – that I was cut down at the edge of the forest, moved from my trunk.
Strong foes took me there, fashioned me to be a spectacle for them, bade me raise up their felons.
Men bore me on their shoulders there, till they set me on a hill; many foes made me fast there.
I saw then the Lord of mankind hasten with great zeal that He might be raised upon me.
Then I durst not there bow or break against the Lord’s behest, when I saw the surface of the earth shake;
I could have felled all the foes, yet I stood firm. 

‘Then the young Hero – He was God almighty – firm and unflinching, stripped Himself;
He mounted on the high cross, brave in the sight of many, when He was minded to redeem mankind. Then I trembled when the Hero clasped me; yet I durst not bow to the earth, fall to the level of the ground, but I must needs stand firm.

‘As a rood was I raised up; I bore aloft the mighty King, the Lord of heaven; I durst not stoop.
They pierced me with dark nails; the wounds are still plain to view in me, gaping gashes of malice;
I durst not do hurt to any of them. They bemocked us both together.
I was all bedewed with blood, shed from the Man’s side, after He had sent forth His Spirit.
I have endured many stern trials on the hill; I saw the God of hosts violently stretched out; darkness with its clouds had covered the Lord’s corpse, the fair radiance; a shadow went forth, dark beneath the clouds.
All creation wept, lamented the King’s death; Christ was on the cross.

‘Yet eager ones came there from afar to the Prince; I beheld all that.
I was grievously troubled with sorrows, yet I bowed to the hands of men in humbleness with great zeal. There they took Almighty God, lifted Him from the heavy torment; the warriors left me standing, covered with blood; I was all stricken with shafts.
Then they laid Him down, weary of limb; stood at His body’s head; there they looked on the Lord of heaven; and He rested there for a space, tired after the mighty strife.
Then in sight of the slayers men began to fashion Him a tomb; they hewed it out of bright stone; they placed therein the Lord of victories.
Then, unhappy in the eventide, they began to sing a dirge, when they were about to depart in their sorrow from the glorious Prince; He rested there alone.

‘Now, my loved man, thou mayest hear that I have endured bitter anguish, grievous sorrows.
Now the time has come when far and wide over the earth and all this splendid creation, men do me honour; they worship this sign.
On me the Son of God suffered for a space; wherefore now I rise glorious beneath the heavens, and I can heal all who fear me.

‘Long ago I became the severest of torments, most hateful to men, before I opened to mankind the true path of life.
Lo! The Prince of glory, the Lord of heaven honoured me then beyond the trees of the forest, even as Almighty God also honoured his mother Mary herself above the whole race of women.

‘Now I bid thee, my loved man, to declare this vision unto men; reveal in words that it is the glorious tree on which Almighty God suffered for the many sins of mankind and the old deeds of Adam.

‘There He tasted death; yet God rose up again with His mighty power to help man.
Then He ascended to heaven; hither again will the Lord Himself make His way to this world to seek mankind on the day of judgment, Almighty God and His angels with Him, when He who has power of judgment will judge each one according as he merits in this fleeting life.
No one can be without fear there at the word the Lord says: He will ask before the multitude where the man is who for God’s sake would taste bitter death, as He aforetime did on the cross; but then they will be afraid, and think little of what they begin to say to Christ.
No one need be terrified there who erstwhile bears in his breast the best of signs, but each soul which desires to dwell with the Lord must through the cross seek the kingdom which is far from earth.’

Then glad at heart I worshipped the cross with great zeal, where I was alone with none to bear me company.
My soul was eager to depart; I felt many yearnings within me.
Now I have joy of life that I can seek the triumphant cross alone more often than all men, do it full honour.
Great is the desire for that in my heart, and to the cross I turn for help.
I have not many powerful friends on earth, but they have gone away hence from the joys of the world, have sought the King of heaven, live now in heaven with God the Father, dwell in glory; and each day I look for the time when the Lord’s cross, which erstwhile I saw here on earth, will fetch me from this fleeting life, and bring me then where there is great gladness, joy in heaven, where God’s people are placed at the feast, where there is bliss unending; and will set me then where I may thereafter dwell in glory, enjoy happiness fully with the saints.
May the Lord, who here on earth suffered aforetime on the cross for the sins of men, be a friend unto me; He has redeemed us and has given us life, a heavenly home.

Hope was born anew with blessedness and joy for those who before endured the burning.
The Son was triumphant on His journey, mighty and successful, when He, the Master almighty, came with the throng, the company of spirits, into God’s kingdom – to gladness of the angels and all the saints who before dwelt in heaven in glory, when their Lord, Almighty God, came where his home was.

Posted in Democracy, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Grazers, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on He Hath Bourne Our Griefs

Even Unto the End of the World

Posted on June 16, 2018 by cwny

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels. – Mark 8: 36-38

__________

The de-emphasis of the incarnation of Christ in the Christian churches and the denial of the incarnation of Christ in secular Europe is the reason that the European race is fast disappearing from the face of the earth. What binds Judaism, Islam, and liberalism together? All three religions deny the incarnation of the Son of God. The hatred of the white race exhibited by those religious bodies and the other sects of colored heathens is motivated by Satan’s deep-seated hatred of the antique Europeans, the people who made Christ incarnate in their culture. Satan wants the incarnation of the Son of God to be an idea, he does not want the Word of God to be made flesh, because he can always win a debate, but he cannot win a war against men with hearts of flesh consecrated to the incarnate God.

I recently read a tract, and such tracts are legion, by a religious expert who claimed there was no difference between pagan Europe and Christian Europe, because both periods of European history produced murders, adulteries, wars, and sexual perversions. Is it really necessary to point out the incredible differences between pagan Europe and Christian Europe? A theologian who makes the ‘no difference’ claim is not interested in the truth. He is only interested in his own utopian fantasies. If mankind will only follow his twenty-point plan he will make men like unto God. But if we eschew Christian utopianism, which is a plea to reenact Adam’s and Eve’s original sin, “Ye shall be as Gods,” we can see that there was an incarnational culture. The European people made Christ the moral essence of their culture. He was more than an idea to them, He was their heart and soul. The difference between an idea religion and a hearth-fire religion is the difference between heaven and hell. As soon as Christ’s incarnation becomes an idea in men’s minds rather than the burning passionate belief of their heart, Satan can shift men’s focus away from God and make them view his satanic vision of life in a new and pleasant light.

The race war is a religious war because our God is an incarnate God. If Christ was not really true God and true man, if the flesh cannot be sanctified, then all men are universals, they are part of an aggregate herd called ‘mankind.’ But if the spirit can take on flesh, then the skin color of the people who circumcised their hearts and took Christ into their racial hearth fire has eternal significance. The European people set themselves apart from the other races because they gave us a glimpse — actually it was more than a glimpse, it was a vision — of the living God.

All efforts to restore Western civilization will fail unless those efforts are focused on inspiring white people to return to their racial hearth fire and defend it. We can’t go on as an Undine race, the people who have no souls, and still continue as a race. Of course that is what the liberals desire. They have already decreed, and they are acting on that decree, that the white race is a non-human race that should be exterminated. The Christian churches serve as the great anesthetizers. It is in the churches that the desoulment takes place. St. Paul told us that Christ’s church consisted of those men and women who had taken Christ into their hearts. “Not so,” say the churchmen. “The church of God is an organization built on an idea of God – our idea of God.” But an idea is shifting sand, it lacks a local habitation in the human heart. The organized Christian churches are fusing with organized Islam and organized Jewry because they no longer diverge from those religions; having abandoned their racial hearth fire, the European churchmen have lost their vision of the incarnate God of Europe. Without that vision they are Undines, in search of a soul, in the forests of Brazil, in the nation state of Israel, or through their worship of the sacred negro. They refuse to look for their God at the hearth fire of the European people, because they fear the racist label.

If fear of the living God is the beginning of wisdom, then what are we to make of a people who fear Satan’s racist label, which he places on all white men who love their own in and through the Savior? Sadly, we can make nothing of them, because they have willed themselves into a deathlike sleep; they are walking shadows who fret and strut their hour upon the stage of life without the passion to love their God and their people enough to fight for them. Life is only a tale told by an idiot to those who have severed the ties of blood that connect them to the living God.

The liberals, who are legion, believe in incarnational politics; they will settle for nothing less than the incarnation of Satan in the nations that formerly constituted Christendom. The reason leaders such as Orbán of Hungary and Trump in America enrage the liberals is because their politics represent compromise; they want a place for white Christians within Liberaldom. That compromise is an anathema to the liberals. And it should be an anathema to the white Christian as well. We cannot compromise with liberals. They want the blood of the white man, there is nothing that he can say or do to appease the liberals. He must willingly take his place on the sacrificial altar so that the liberals can propitiate their colored gods. The only effective resistance to liberalism is incarnational Christianity. Christ cannot be one democratic option among the Satanic –isms, for the simple reason that in a straight democracy Christ always loses – “Give us Barabbas!” The heathen will always rage against the light of the world. It is up to the Europeans, the Christ-bearers, to drive the heathens from the white lands along with the liberal Ganelons.

Ever since the time of the French Revolution the Europeans have been playing a game called “compromise with the liberals.” And the liberals always win. They have destroyed, in the name of liberty, equality, and fraternity, every vestige of incarnational Europe. Burke warned the West that the Jacobin snake did not die with Robespierre, it was alive and well, and its venom was called democracy. Under the guise of democracy every evil under the sun has been institutionalized. During the American Civil War the abolitionists insisted that the Civil War was not a war in support of miscegenation; they said it was a war for negro enfranchisement. But negro enfranchisement did mean miscegenation. Once that barrier was broken, the liberals did not apologize for breaking their word, they simply moved on to the next hurdle. The emancipation of women, for instance, was not presented as the destruction of Christian marriage, it was presented as simple democratic enfranchisement. Now that the Christian patriarchal family has been destroyed and white Christian masculinity proscribed, do we hear anyone crying foul? No, we do not. Every channel of grace flowing from white Christian Europe has been destroyed by the liberals. And the churchmen have helped the liberals damn up those channels of grace. The Welsh minstrel tells us that, “Nothing can compare to the love that once was there.” What love was there? The love that a man has for his own kith and kin, which is sanctified by His presence and His blessing. The liberals sing a different tune. They sing of the hatred of all things white and Christian and bid us look to a future without white people and without Christ. And that future has arrived. We still have some white grazers left, but we have very few white people, whites who are willing to love their own kind, in and through the Savior without fear of the racist label and without any apologies.

The Grand Inquisitor in Dostoevsky’s novel The Brothers Karamazov hurls a serious accusation at Christ. He tells Him, “You said you would return and you didn’t.” And since Christ failed to return, the Grand Inquisitor felt it was incumbent upon him to recreate a church in his image rather than in Christ’s image. Isn’t that precisely what has happened in the European nations? The scribes and the Pharisees have stepped in to fill the void left by Christ’s ‘broken’ promise. But doesn’t that leave the Holy Ghost out of the picture? Christ said He would leave us a Comforter until His return. Did He lie? It only appears so to those who have forsaken the Holy Ghost, who resides in hearts of flesh. If you must see an external sign, the type of sign that science and scientized theology provide, you will feel abandoned by God. Our churches have institutionalized that feeling of abandonment and turned their people over to the heathen gods. The prayer to our Father who art in Heaven has become a prayer to nature and nature’s gods – the sacred negro, the Moslem zealot, the Hindu holy man, and the nation state of Israel. If we don’t believe that Christ was incarnate in old Europe and vow to stay by the hearth fire of the antique Europeans, we will become part of the new Europe. And in the new Europe Satan reigns supreme. He is the incarnate ruler of Liberaldom. 

Satan had to impose his will on the European people incrementally. He had to undermine the Christian foundations before he could launch a frontal attack. Now that white pietas has become the new ‘original sin,’ the European people are without a Comforter, because the Holy Ghost only resides in the circumcised heart, a heart ready to receive the incarnate God. Lady Macbeth asks the devil to

…stop up the’ access and passage to remorse,
That no compunctious visitings of nature
Shake my fell purpose, nor keep peace between
Th’ effect and it.

That is the ethos of the liberals. It is impossible to fight that satanic ethos without a belief in the whole Christian fairy tale – that Christ became flesh, was crucified, died and was buried, and on the third day He rose from the dead. And then, when He ascended into heaven, He left us a Comforter so that we could know that He was with us always. It sounds like such an impossible tale. We cannot wrap our minds around it, because it’s so unmodern and unscientific. I would submit that the Christian fairy tale seems remote to the modern Europeans because they have chosen to reenact the original sin: They have scientized God and made His word subject to the laws of nature. But He is not out there in Satan’s natural world, His world is the fairy kingdom where loving hearts seek Him still. He tells the scribes and Pharisees that there shall be no sign, because He is the sign. When we completely reject the world of the scribes and Pharisees, the world ruled by Satan, we will enter the real world, which is His world, a world of faith, hope, and charity. The passage to that world starts at home, by our European hearth fire. +

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Fairy tale mode of understanding, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Propositional faith | Tagged , | Comments Off on Even Unto the End of the World

One Particular God

Posted on June 9, 2018 by cwny

And Jesus departed from thence, and came nigh unto the sea of Galilee; and went up into a mountain, and sat down there. And great multitudes came unto him, having with them those that were lame, blind, dumb, maimed, and many others, and cast them down at Jesus’ feet; and he healed them: Insomuch that the multitude wondered, when they saw the dumb to speak, the maimed to be whole, the lame to walk, and the blind to see: and they glorified the God of Israel. –Matthew 15: 29-31

_____

No appeal to white self-interest will work, because liberals have no race or faith. Only a man who believes that his race is an element of his personality which is connected to his God cares about the extinction of his race. The white race did not conquer the world because individual whites were smarter, swifter, or stronger than the people of other races. They conquered because they loved their God while those of other races only propitiated their gods. The summons of the fiery cross will only be answered by men with hearts of fire. One particular, personal God, and only that God, is capable of setting hearts on fire. No matter how small the white remnant, and no matter how numerous the foe, the men with the hearts of fire will keep Satan at bay until He comes to lead the final charge. – CWNY

__________

The white people protesting Tommy Robinson’s imprisonment for opposing the Moslem rapists must have some remnant of Christianity left in them or else they would not be protesting. But are protests by white people against liberal cruelty and injustice ever effective? No, they are not. Protests are part of the democratic process, and the democratic process is an invention of the devil to destroy the Christ-bearing race. You can’t seek redemption from the devil. The only protests that are successful in a democratic system are those that help Satan tighten his stranglehold on the European people. The civil rights protests were successful because the rulers of the Western world wanted to encourage miscegenation. Gandhi’s protests were successful because the British government wanted an excuse to throw off the white man’s burden.

In contrast to those satanically inspired, successful protests, the prolife movement was a colossal failure, because the liberals did not want to provide legal protection to the infants in the womb. If white Christians really want to do something about the liberals’ reign of cruelty, they must leave the democratic process, which includes peaceful protests, behind and make the great return: They must return to the blood and soil faith of their European ancestors. And I am not referring to our pagan ancestors, I am referring to the followers of Odin who bent their knees to Christ without sacrificing any of the fighting spirit that inspired them to fight for Odin. The Christian Europeans such as Alfred did not become lesser men when they took on the mantle of Christ, they became greater men, because the measure of a man is what he fights for. How can there be anything greater than His reign of charity?

The white men who want to halt legalized abortion and the persecution of innocent whites, such as Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson, must decide which master they shall serve. If they continue to “protest” evil within the confines of a system that exists for one purpose only, to destroy the good and perpetuate evil, then they have decided to serve Satan. If they decide to make the Christ of old Europe their master, they will not seek redemption from the devil. They will leave the democratic process behind and fight evil the way Europeans used to fight evil before they became entwined within the coils of the democratic process.

In Walt Disney’s Zorro (the real Walt Disney), Don Diego comes home from Spain and hears a tale of horror from his father. The comandante is cruel, merciless, unjust, etc. What is Don Diego’s response? He tells his father he is going to sit down and write a letter to the Viceroy. Of course his father is disgusted with him. Letter-writing is not going to stop the evil comandante. Don Diego knows that. During the day he is a fop who fights evil with letter-writing, but during the night he is Zorro, who fights evil with his good sword. “Ah, but men like Zorro and William Tell only exist in story books. You cannot act like that in the modern world!” the democracy-loving protester tells me. European men did once act like Zorro and William Tell. Were the evil comandantes and the Gesslers prevented from doing evil because of protest movements? Of course they weren’t. Why then do we expect the liberals, who are much more evil than the petty tyrants of yesteryear, to stop doing evil because of a few protest marches?

White foppery in the form of a protest movement is not the proper response to the evil of liberalism. It accomplishes nothing and may do a great deal of harm, in that it allows whites to think they are ‘doing something’ when in reality they are doing nothing. The Tommy Robinson arrest is a case in point. If he serves any length of time in jail, it could well be a death sentence for him. Will it help him if white people protest after his murder? Wouldn’t it be better if white people let it be known that any judge who sentences Tommy Robinson to prison will die?

The white protests designed to convert the devil are a sad reenactment of the so-called prolife movement. For 45 years the prolifers have been protesting legalized abortion, and for 45 years they have gotten no results. Yet they never look at the obvious reason why the liberals keep winning the abortion wars. The liberals keep winning because they have no fear of white Christians. Whenever a white Christian actually does what is necessary and kills an abortion doctor, the ‘prolifers’ run and hide under their beds while screaming, “I am against violence.” That is precisely why you, Mr. Prolifer, should be in favor of killing abortion doctors and burning down the abortuaries. The liberals have taken violence to a new level. They burn, slice, and stab young babies in the womb. Is that not violence? Can people who do such violence be made to stop their murderous spree by gentle persuasion? Only fear of death, their own, will make liberals stop doing evil, whether it is the murder of infants or the slaughter of the white race.

The Christian Europeans walked on water because they took the Son of God into their hearts. If you deny the reality of Christian Europe, if you claim the antique Europeans did not know Christ because they were racist, homophobic, and sexist, in contrast to the modern Christians who are not racist, homophobic, or sexist, you must tell me why the antique Europeans, who were supposed to be so evil, gave us a glimpse of the living God while the modern anti-European liberals have given us a glimpse of hell? There is no avoiding the ancient Europeans’ connection to Christ. When Christ dwelt by the Europeans’ hearth fire, the European people knew how to respond to the devil and his minions. When Christ was Gnosticized, when He became the end product of a syllogism instead of the God of our ascending race, we were left foundering in the seas of liberalism. Protest movements are the white, Gnosticized Christians’ pleas to the liberals to save them from drowning. But the liberals want the white Christians to drown, and the sea is the sea and drowning men will drown unless… They will drown unless they learn to walk on water again. Having once fixed our eyes on Christ we cannot falter or we will drown in the sea of liberalism. The vision of Christ crucified, Christ risen was bred in the bone and nurtured in the hearts of the antique Europeans. Without that breeding and that nurturing we cannot respond to the wickedness and snares of the devil as Christian men should respond. We will be forever chained to the democratic rock without any hope of being delivered from our bondage.

As incarnational Europe fades from the memory of modern Europeans, let me raise one voice in defense of Christian Europe. We cannot be fully human unless we revere His divine humanity. The antique Europeans were not perfect, they were not gods, but they revered His sacred humanity and in doing so they showed us the glory of a Christ-centered humanity. What do the modern Europeans show us? They show us nothing of God. We only see all that is unholy and blasphemous in the pigsties of modern Europe.

The purpose of institutionalized liberalism is to eradicate every last trace of humanity from the face of the earth. The liberals’ focus has been and will continue to be on the white race, because the antique Europeans were the most Christ-centered and therefore the most fully human people who ever walked the earth. And any member of a non-white race who shows even a glimmer of respect for the ancient faith of the European people, a Gunga Din, will be exterminated as well. Despite their claim, “We love humanity,” the liberals hate humanity just as their master, the devil, hates humanity. R. L. Stevenson captures the essence of liberalism in his short fable titled, “The Four Reformers”:

Four reformers met under a bramble-bush. They were all agreed the world must be changed. “We must abolish property,” said one.

“We must abolish marriage,” said the second.

“We must abolish God,” said the third.

“I wish we could abolish work,” said the fourth.

“Do not let us get beyond practical politics,” said the first. “The first thing is to reduce men to a common level.”

“The first thing,” said the second, “is to give freedom to the sexes.”

“The first thing,” said the third, “is to find out how to do it.”

“The first step,” said the first, “is to abolish the Bible.”

“The first thing,” said the second, “is to abolish the laws.”

“The first thing,” said the third, “is to abolish mankind.”

Have I gone too far afield from the plight of Tommy Robinson and the countless other white victims of liberal cruelty and colored savagery? No, I haven’t. If we don’t see liberalism in all its guises as from the devil, we will not be able to defend our people, such as Tommy Robinson, against the liberals’ satanic onslaught. We need the full armor of Christ in order to do battle with the devil. We cannot arm ourselves with the democratic weapons of the devil in order to combat the devil. Once the European people believe that liberalism is Satanic, they will no longer oppose liberal evil with foppery, they will fight as integral men fight for what they love; they will fight with all their heart, mind, and soul.

The marriage between the European people and Christ was a blessed union, a blessed union that Satan was determined to end. He succeeded because he turned a marriage based on love into a marriage of convenience. When the Europeans ceased to see the moral beauty of Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection, they ceased to love Christ. It is still convenient for them to refer to Christ now when they need a spokesman for racial equality or some other social problem, but the love match is over. Christ has been trivialized out of Europe because the Europeans can no longer understand a God of depth. When they abandoned their racial hearth fire, the European people became incapable of maintaining their blessed union with Christ. They have become spiritually neutered. The living God comes to human hearts, He does not come to us through a series of philosophical incantations or the nation state of Israel. If we settle for a formulaic, superficial Christ we will stay in the land of the Undines, the land of the men and women who have no souls.

Burke reminds us that a nation is a moral essence, not a geographical entity. The moral essence of old Europe was Christ. We cannot graft Christ onto a nation, the nation of Liberaldom, with an amoral satanic essence. The great tragedy of the 21st century is that professed Christians as well as mad dog liberals vilify and spit on the moral essence of old Europe. We live in Biblical times. We need to believe that our Lord will not leave us naked to our enemies. It’s difficult to believe in the 7,000, but that is what Satan wants: “Despair and die.” If we set the modern world against the moral essence of old Europe and see what the liberals, at Satan’s behest, have destroyed, we will not go quietly into the dark night of liberalism. The 91st Psalm is forever relevant, but it is most particularly relevant for an antique European living in Liberaldom:

Because he hath set his love upon me, therefore will I deliver him: I will set him on high, because he hath known my name.

It all begins and ends with the great refusal – We shall not abandon our Jesus, the Christ of old Europe. +

Posted in Democracy, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on One Particular God

The Liberals’ Metamorphosis

Posted on June 2, 2018 by cwny

Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour. –1 Peter 5: 8

__________

Pope Francis the blasphemer is always very forthright and uncompromising when he condemns white pietas, which he calls racism. But when he approaches the liberals’ sacred cows, he is very understanding. For instance, he can’t really say that homosexuality is wrong. Why can’t he say that it is wrong? It was always considered wrong by Protestants and Catholics for over a thousand years. So again, what is so difficult about standing up for the age old Christianity of the European people? It is difficult to stand up for Christian morality when you don’t really believe that Christ was the Son of God. The modern Catholic church is like unto the Disney corporation. The corporate executives have to retain many of the symbols and trappings of their founder, because it was his vision that created the Disney empire, but they do not share the same vision as Walt Disney. In point of fact, their beliefs are in direct contrast to Walt Disney’s beliefs. But they need to feed off his poetic vision, so they retain the Disney name while espousing values that are in direct conflict with Walt Disney’s values.

So it is with the Roman Catholic executives. They still keep Christ as the symbolic head of their corporation, but they have denied Him in their hearts. They no longer believe that He is the Son of the living God, so they no longer feel the need to adhere to the moral code that stems from a belief in the Son of God. They keep Christ as a figure head, because they earn their living by posing as Christians, but their hearts belong to the liberals.

The devil is not a poet. He is, as the poet Walter Scott pointed out, a strict formalist:

Once upon a time this old hag is said to have crossed the moor, driving before her a flock of geese, which she proposed to sell to advantage at a neighbouring fair;—for it is well known that the fiend, however liberal in imparting his powers of doing mischief, ungenerously leaves his allies under the necessity of performing the meanest rustic labours for subsistence. The day was far advanced, and her chance of obtaining a good price depended on her being first at the market. But the geese, which had hitherto preceded her in a pretty orderly manner, when they came to this wide common, interspersed with marshes and pools of water, scattered in every direction, to plunge into the element in which they delighted. Incensed at the obstinacy with which they defied all her efforts to collect them, and not remembering the precise terms of the contract by which the fiend was bound to obey her commands for a certain space, the sorceress exclaimed, “Deevil, that neither I nor they ever stir from this spot more!” The words were hardly uttered, when, by a metamorphosis as sudden as any in Ovid, the hag and her refractory flock were converted into stone, the angel whom she served, being a strict formalist, grasping eagerly at an opportunity of completing the ruin of her body and soul by a literal obedience to her orders.

The Black Dwarf

Using the forms of Christianity, the devil is able to ape the good in order to advance his satanic agenda. The miracle of married love which produces a child is turned into the sacrificial rite of “free choice,” in which an infant child is sacrificed on the altars of liberalism. Every perversion under the sun is given an inverted Christian sanction. Pope Francis’s support of sodomy, which is given a Christian meaning by applying the ‘judge not that ye be judged’ label on the sin, in a complete distortion of the text, is another example of the satanic inversion of Christianity. Pope John XXIII gave us another sample of the new, satanic Christianity when he had “loving forgiveness” for the black Satanists who tortured, raped, and murdered nuns and priests of his own race and his own church. All such perversions and barbarities, and the list of the perversions and barbarities is endless, are done under the formal mantle of a hellish, twisted Christianity in which false prophets, the prophets of liberalism, bid us follow the false messiahs of reason, science, and the ‘noble black savage.’

At the turn of the 19th century the people of Europe could not absorb undiluted Satanism. So Satan came to them in a diluted form. He kept the outward forms of Christianity alive while changing the inmost heart and soul of European culture. Our culture was consecrated to Christ; it is now consecrated to Satan. In order to make that change, it was necessary to plant the idea in men’s minds that God was to be found out there, in nature, and God was to be worshipped, not in spirit and truth, but in formal rites devoid of their spiritual center, which was and is, Christ the Lord.

It’s impossible not to see that in the 21st century the Satanism of the liberals is less diluted. Whether this is a tactical error of Satan or a tactical error of the liberals which Satan cannot control, or a tactical master stroke is more than we know. But it is clear the liberals feel less of a need to cloak their evil intentions. They never debate any more, they just refuse a hearing to any dissenters and/or jail them, as was the case with Tommy Robinson and Jayda Fransen. They also openly talk about the extermination of the white race, which was not something that they espoused so openly in the 20th century. Shouldn’t the liberals be afraid of a white backlash? It doesn’t seem like they have anything to be afraid of. The European people will only fight if they believe that Christ is the Son of God and they are the Christ-bearing race. So long as they believe that whiteness is the original sin and the liberals’ nature religion of the black Messiah is the one true faith, they will not fight for their own people or for the restoration of Christian Europe, which are really one and the same thing.

Satan cannot understand the poetic of Christ crucified, Christ risen, because he is completely devoid of poetic sentiments. But he does possess mathematical intelligence, and he uses that intelligence to maintain the outer forms of the Christian poetic, which he uses for his own satanic purposes.  Starting from a mathematical base, Satan proceeded to prove to the Europeans that man was nothing more than a by-product of the natural world. He failed time and time again in his quest to place a wedge between the European people and Christ but finally he succeeded in his efforts. He placed the natural world, the world of ‘2 plus 2 makes 4,’ before the European  people’s eyes and bid them study that world ad nauseam until they saw nothing else but that world. Once that metamorphosis was complete, once the Europeans saw with and not through their eyes, the devil’s triumph was complete. But of course it is not in the devil’s nature to rest contented. He must push onward and downward, until the image of God in man is completely eradicated from the face of the earth. Then, when the earth has become hell, the devil hopes that he can be free of God and never have to look on the Divine Countenance again. That is his desire and that is the desire of his minions, the apostate liberals who worship darkness and reject the light.

In Michelangelo’s painting on the Sistine Chapel ceiling, he depicts the hand of God reaching out to the hand of man. If I had the artistic ability I would paint a picture of Satan, immersed in the pit of hell, reaching out to the modern Europeans. They would not be resisting Satan. They would be flocking to him in order to be part of his kingdom of everlasting night. On their faces would be looks of sheer terror, but they would not be terrified of hell. They would be looking behind them for fear that He might still be seeking them out in order to prevent their glorious marriage to Satan.

The modern white wants to obliterate his whiteness in the arms of the devil. On this earth, the colored heathens serve as the strong arms of the devil. Now the liberals see the devil darkly through the colored races, but once they have achieved hell, they will see the demon whom they worshipped on earth face to face.

Whiteness is not the original sin. The Christ-bearing race championed the God of mercy in a world devoid of mercy. Then they abandoned the God of mercy and sought out the savage gods of color. That is their sin and it is not original. It is the sin of all the colored races who preferred the gods of sacrifice to the God of Mercy. Where is mercy to be found now that the liberals have joined with the colored heathens to eradicate mercy from the face of the earth? It’s to be found in Christ’s church, which was never an organization of corporate executives; it was and is the union of hearts of flesh, hearts that love Christ in spirit and in truth. I believe in the people with the hearts of flesh, I believe that they knew the one true God, and I believe I can know that God in this world and be with Him in the next world if I do not sever my connection to the antique Europeans. They touched the heart of God, and through them I touch the heart of God.

In 1st Corinthians St. Paul speaks of a mystery:

Behold I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed. In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump; for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

The liberals do not believe in that mystery, but they do believe, because they accept all of Satan’s inversions of Christianity, in the mystery of liberal metamorphosis. They believe they can transcend their whiteness, their original sin, through the love of the noble black savage. And their love of the black savior is maintained by the Father, which is the abstract intellect, and the Holy Ghost, which is science. We can never save our people by appealing to the liberals’ self-interest – “You too are white,” – because they have made a Gnostic transformation. They have left their whiteness behind. Nor can you appeal to the liberals’ mercy – “You can’t murder a whole race of people.” Yes, the liberals can and will murder a whole race of people. They have killed the white pietas in their own hearts, so they must kill the white pietas in every white heart.

When God took flesh and dwelt among us, He joined His divine humanity with our humanity. What a blessed union! The liberals have done just the opposite. They have joined with the colored savages to form an unholy union devoid of mercy. Their union has produced nothing but cruelty. It’s as if Dotheboys Hall, that terrible boarding school in Dickens’ novel Nicholas Nickleby, in which merciless cruelty is the norm, has become the world. And that world, which is Satan’s world, will not be brought down by voting or pleas for mercy. It will be brought down by Christian men with hearts of flesh who strike home in defense of the helpless.

Squeers caught the boy firmly in his grip; one desperate cut had fallen on his body—he was wincing from the lash and uttering a scream of pain—it was raised again, and again about to fall—when Nicholas Nickleby, suddenly starting up, cried ‘Stop!’ in a voice that made the rafters ring.

‘Who cried stop?’ said Squeers, turning savagely round.

‘I,’ said Nicholas, stepping forward. ‘This must not go on.’

‘Must not go on!’ cried Squeers, almost in a shriek.

‘No!’ thundered Nicholas.

Aghast and stupefied by the boldness of the interference, Squeers released his hold of Smike, and, falling back a pace or two, gazed upon Nicholas with looks that were positively frightful.

‘I say must not,’ repeated Nicholas, nothing daunted; ‘shall not. I will prevent it.’

Squeers continued to gaze upon him, with his eyes starting out of his head; but astonishment had actually, for the moment, bereft him of speech.

‘You have disregarded all my quiet interference in the miserable lad’s behalf,’ said Nicholas; ‘you have returned no answer to the letter in which I begged forgiveness for him, and offered to be responsible that he would remain quietly here. Don’t blame me for this public interference. You have brought it upon yourself; not I.’

‘Sit down, beggar!’ screamed Squeers, almost beside himself with rage, and seizing Smike as he spoke.

‘Wretch,’ rejoined Nicholas, fiercely, ‘touch him at your peril! I will not stand by, and see it done. My blood is up, and I have the strength of ten such men as you. Look to yourself, for by Heaven I will not spare you, if you drive me on!’

‘Stand back,’ cried Squeers, brandishing his weapon.

‘I have a long series of insults to avenge,’ said Nicholas, flushed with passion; ‘and my indignation is aggravated by the dastardly cruelties practised on helpless infancy in this foul den. Have a care; for if you do raise the devil within me, the consequences shall fall heavily upon your own head!’

He had scarcely spoken, when Squeers, in a violent outbreak of wrath, and with a cry like the howl of a wild beast, spat upon him, and struck him a blow across the face with his instrument of torture, which raised up a bar of livid flesh as it was inflicted. Smarting with the agony of the blow, and concentrating into that one moment all his feelings of rage, scorn, and indignation, Nicholas sprang upon him, wrested the weapon from his hand, and pinning him by the throat, beat the ruffian till he roared for mercy.

I repeat, our world, the European world, is ruled by a cabal of cruel, merciless vipers who rejoice in the degradation, torture, rape, and murder of white people. Their merciless reign must be stopped. But it can only be stopped by white men whose hearts burn within them from an encounter with the risen Lord, our Jesus, the God of our racial hearth fire. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Defense of the White Race, Muscular Christianity, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Liberals’ Metamorphosis

The One Great Mystery

Posted on May 26, 2018 by cwny

And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him. And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.

And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law, Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said, Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word: For mine eyes have seen thy salvation, Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people; A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.

And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against; (Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed. –Luke 2: 25-35

________________________________

In W. H. Mallock’s novel The New Paul and Virginia (1878), Mallock sets out to destroy the New Age modernists in state and church by depicting what would happen if their ideas were actually acted upon. In order to prove to the reader that he is not making up the insane philosophers cited by his characters, he places quotes from the actual authors of the insanity in the back of the book. Such modern lights as Huxley, Tyndall, and W. K. Clifford are quoted often. The following quote from W. K. Clifford’s book Cosmic Emotion pretty much sums up the religious viewpoints of all the modernists who are held up to ridicule in Mallock’s novel:

The two kinds of cosmic emotion run together and become one. The microcosm is viewed only in relation to human action; nature is presented to the emotions as the guide and teacher of humanity. And the microcosm is viewed only as tending to complete correspondence with the external; human conduct is subject for reverence only in so far as it is consonant to the demiurgic law, in harmony with the teaching of divine Nature. – Professor Clifford

What was a fringe movement in the 19th century, the return to Baal, became an acceptable alternative to Christianity, in sugar-coated language, in the first half of the 20th century. And in the second half of the 20th century, the religion of the insane, sophistic, pagan Europeans such as Clifford, Huxley, and Tyndall, became the religion of the European people.

Mallock’s depiction of the liberals’ brave new world of the future is remarkably accurate, but there was a limit to the depravities that Mallock could envision if the new “enlightened” views of the cosmic liberals of his time were put into practice. After all, Mallock was an honorable, Victorian Christian. How could he possibly foresee the extent of the evil that liberalism, once it became institutionalized, would bring upon Western man? We, of the 21st century, can now see the extent of the evil, but paradoxically the 21st century Europeans, having plummeted to an intellectualized state of unparalleled barbarism, have no sense of their own depravity. And that is the worst state of depravity, to wallow in the pigsties of liberalism without even knowing one is in a pigsty. Even Kurtz, in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, was able to see his depravity: “The horror, the horror,” but the modern European wallows in the horror and loves it.

Liberalism is a uniquely European phenomenon, because the essence of liberalism is a rejection of Christ in order to return to Baal. The people of color did not have to reject Christ, for the simple reason that they never made Christ the lodestar of their culture. Nor did they have to return to Baal, because they never left Baal. Because of the European people’s Christian past, their return to Baal had to be couched in Christian language. In France, the Jacobins screamed ‘Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity’ in order to justify their bloodletting, and the Russian communists used similar ‘God’ words. But in both cases, the French and the Russian, the ‘return to Baal’ revolutionaries went too fast. The European people, in the main, were not yet ready for that kind of unmitigated liberal savagery. The French liberals shifted to the gradual Americanized return to Baal, while Russia, after a longer reign of terror than France, also shifted to the American way, a longer, slower return to Baal. The reason the formerly communist countries of Eastern Europe show more signs of life than the countries of Western Europe is because the direct, Robespierre-type approach steels a people’s resolve to resist more than the seductive approach of the democratic way does. If you had the money to flee Western Europe, any of the Eastern European countries would be preferable to the countries of Western Europe. But the nations of Eastern Europe are still under the shroud of liberalism. I cringe when I hear their leaders talking about Christian democracies. There can be no such thing. Democracy is a God word the liberals use to disguise the horror of the Europeans’ return to Baal; it should never be coupled with Christianity.

Metternich’s warning – “Every time I hear the word ‘democracy’ I know a blood bath is coming” – should be taken to heart by every European, especially now when we can see the terrible devastation wrought during the democratic era of the European people’s history. Life is tragic; we all must suffer and die in the flesh. But do we have to suffer and die without hope in the Redeemer? “Yes,” the liberals tell us, “we are all part of a universal democracy, consisting of millions upon millions of walking dead men, born of nature and destined to return to nature.” Where then is our hope? “We can hope that mankind will be happy some two hundred years hence when white people have been eliminated, and all mankind, minus white mankind, can cavort around the throne of the sacred negro.”

The conservative-liberals spent all their efforts after World War II combating communism. But the conservatives completely ignored the democratic heresy, the other side of the utopian, universalist coin. Democracy, like communism, celebrates the triumph of the aggregate herd over the individual human soul. There is no room for the spirit in democracy, because the spirit of man cannot be democratized. There is a hierarchy of value in the spiritual realm. The savage races of color are not equal to the white Christ-bearing race, and within the white race the criminals and the Satanic liberals are not equal to the non-liberal, law-abiding whites. But in the natural realm, the doctrine of ‘all are equal, but some are more equal’ becomes the rule. Spiritual values are ignored in favor of bestial values. The colored savage is elevated to a God-like status while the white Christian is demonized. And the criminally insane liberals are given seats of power and influence. The true order of society is shattered and chaos and savagery reign supreme. Shakespeare describes this state of affairs in his play Troilus and Cressida:

In evil mixture to disorder wander,   
What plagues and what portents! what mutiny!
What raging of the sea! shaking of earth!
Commotion in the winds! Frights, changes, horrors,
Divert and crack, rend and deracinate,
The unity and married calm of states
Quite from their fixture! O, when degree is shak’d,
Which is the ladder of all high designs,
The enterprise is sick! How could communities,
Degrees in schools, and brotherhoods in cities,
Peaceful commerce from dividable shores,
The primogenitive and due of birth,
Prerogative of age, crowns, sceptres, laurels,
But by degree, stand in authentic place?
Take but degree away, untune that string,
And hark what discord follows! Each thing meets
In mere oppugnancy. The bounded waters
Should lift their bosoms higher than the shores,
And make a sop of all this solid globe.
Strength should be lord of imbecility,
And the rude son should strike his father dead.
Force should be right; or, rather, right and wrong,
Between whose endless jar justice resides,
Should lose their names, and so should justice too.
Then everything includes itself in power,
Power into will, will into appetite;
And appetite, an universal wolf,
So doubly seconded with will and power,
Must make perforce an universal prey,
And last eat up himself.

The democratized people of Europe and the other European satellite countries such as the United States need to look within at their inhumane, anti-Christian, democratic systems. A far greater threat to the European people than communism abroad is the European people’s infatuated, blind devotion to democracy, a system of tyranny invented by the devil to destroy everything connected to His realm, the realm of the spirit. So long as that moral blindness prevails, so long as the European people treasure modern democratic Europe more than Christian Europe, the colored heathens, the Moslems, and the liberals will continue to rule the European nations. And they will continue to have one overriding, ruling principle: The white race must be eliminated.

Writers such as Kipling, Mallock, and Orwell, who warned the European people of the coming dystopias of liberalism, did not foresee just how pivotal the worship of the negro would be in those dystopias. Edmund Burke was remarkably aware of it, because he kept the entire French Revolution before his eyes. He saw what happened in Haiti as well as France. When democratic equality rather than Christian charity governs a nation, the savagery of the negro becomes a great good, and everything white and Christian becomes a great evil:

It will be an affront to your sagacity, to pursue this matter into all its details; suffice it to say, that if this Convention for analogous domestick Government is made, it immediately gives a right for the residence of a Consul (in all likelihood some Negro or Man of Colour) in every one of your Islands; a Regicide Ambassador in London will be at all your meetings of West India Merchants and Planters, and, in effect, in all our Colonial Councils…

How must we feel, if the pride and flower of the English Nobility and Gentry, who might escape the pestilential clime, and the devouring sword, should, if taken prisoners, be delivered over as rebel subjects, to be condemned as rebels, as traitors, as the vilest of all criminals, by tribunals formed of Maroon negro slaves, covered over with the blood of their masters, who were made free and organized into judges, for their robberies and murders?

-Burke in Letters on a Regicide Peace

How must we, the European people, feel? If we are Christian Europeans, we feel our hearts burn within us, and we vow to fight the satanic liberals and their murderous colored allies to the knife. If we are liberals, we feel a religious ecstasy when we see white blood shed by negro murderers. The blood bath of democracy will go on until the ending of the world unless the European remnant cries halt and fights for a non-democratic Europe dedicated to Christ the King.

The democratic way is so much more than elections. It is science, feminism, legalized abortion, sexual depravity, and negro worship. Above all it is negro worship. That is the lynchpin holding the whole naturalized world of democracy together. Once the negro was made the lodestar of democracy, the liberals were able to demonize anyone who attacked their democratic reign of terror. This is why halfway-house Christians, who want to criticize some aspect of liberalism, such as legalized abortion, always make sure that they pay homage to the liberals’ gods: “Abortion is bad because it hurts black people.” They have a similar response to the Islamic invasion: “We are not racists, we simply oppose terrorism.” On into the dark night of liberalism go the halfway-house Christians. “Thou shall have no other gods before me.” Can you worship the democratic process, in which everything evil under the sun is countenanced, simply because the democratic process has been consecrated to the negro?

In the early stages of the democratic cancer, with the exceptions of Jacobin France and communist Russia, the European people’s return to Baal occurred incrementally, but now the cancer is spreading rapidly. On a daily basis the condition of the European patient worsens. Our people have returned to Baal without a backward look, not even a wistful glance, at their Christian past. Dystopia is here and now; like the Philistines, it has come upon us. But at least Samson knew he had been seduced into a betrayal of his God and his people. He didn’t think he had ‘evolved’ to a higher state of existence.

Recently on her birthday, my wife asked to see the movie A Canterbury Tale (1944). The movie, only tangentially connected to Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, is a lyrical masterpiece that connects us to the past, Britain’s Christian past. I inwardly cringed when she asked to see the movie, because viewing a movie like that is the same as contemplating the life of your loved one immediately after their death. It is so painful. Over time the pain is lessened by the hope in the loved one’s resurrection from the dead, but that initial encounter with that unwelcome visitor is unbelievably painful. So it is with the death of Christian Europe. I can’t always endure the pain of Europe’s demise. But we viewed the movie as a family, and I was glad we did. There was intense sorrow in seeing that which was lost, but in the movie itself there is the hope for the resurrection of the dead. If Christian Europe was once a reality, then Christian Europe still lives. Nothing connected to His realm, the realm of the spirit, ever dies. The Christ of the antique Europeans is our Christ. And our Christ, our Jesus, is the “grave where buried love doth live.”

When I was a freshman in college, there was a student across the hallway in the dorm who worshipped the scientist Nicholas Tesla; his room was a memorial to Tesla. It was his contention that the government had suppressed Tesla’s work because Tesla had discovered the secrets of the universe. I think Tesla still has his devoted band of followers who believe he knew the secrets of the universe. Isn’t the devotion of that student, who of course was a white man, symptomatic of the decline of the European people? They have placed their faith in intelligence divorced from the heart of God. Is there any mystery greater than the mystery of the incarnation of the Son of God? That God should take on human form in order to reach human hearts is a mystery that makes all other mysteries mere dross. But we have left that mystery behind for our systems, built on the abstract theories of men who have rejected Christ. If we cling to that one great mystery and love Him, in and through those “dear old folk of long ago,” He will vouchsafe to us a vision of His sacred Heart. That vision and that vision alone shall sustain us in our battle against the Babylonian armies of the liberals. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Democracy, Halfway-house churches, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The One Great Mystery

In the Lion’s Den

Posted on May 19, 2018 by cwny

My God hath sent his angel, and hath shut the lions’ mouths, that they have not hurt me: forasmuch as before him innocency was found in me; and also before thee, O king, have I done no hurt.

Then was the king exceeding glad for him, and commanded that they should take Daniel up out of the den. So Daniel was taken up out of the den, and no manner of hurt was found upon him, because he believed in his God. —Daniel 6: 22-23

___________________________

The liberals’ tactical plan is crystal clear: Destroy the breeding ground for the plague and you kill the plague. And what is the plague? The plague is Christianity. The liberals, under Satan’s guidance, have adopted a very effective policy; the attack on the European hearth fire has wiped out the Christian plague. The liberals’ successful campaign against the Christian plague was aided by the Gnosticism of the 20th century conservatives. Those less-than-conservative conservatives were like unto a doctor that examines a patient who has the beginnings of gangrene and needs an operation to prevent the gangrene from spreading. But instead of operating, the doctor goes home and writes a scholarly paper about the dangers of gangrene, which he submits to a medical journal. Then the same doctor takes three weeks off from his duties to attend a vitally important conference where all sorts of important medical men meet to discuss the dangers of gangrene. Meanwhile, back on the farm, or in this case, back at the hospital, the patient dies.

The Christian faith is the patient who died, and he died because the Son of Man had no place to rest His head. In the name of an abstract, universalist God named ‘diversity,’ the liberals destroyed the breeding grounds of the Christian faith. That is the tragedy of Europe in the 20th and 21st centuries.

The mad-dog liberals destroyed the European hearth fire while the conservative-Gnostics held conferences. And the white grazers? They acquiesced to liberalism, because the leaders of their churches told them that liberalism was a natural development of Christianity. By the time it had become glaringly apparent that liberalism was not compatible with Christianity, the European people had no heart left for Christ. He had been absent from their hearth fires for too long. Now, wither do they go? When the lost traveler stops his car and asks the farmer how to get to (fill in a generic town name), the farmer replies, “If I was going to ______, I wouldn’t start from here.” But we are here. We live in a brave new world – we live in Liberaldom. It is a world of unsurpassed evil whose rulers are determined to plunge us even deeper into the depths of hell. We can’t continue on the path that our rulers in church and state have mapped out for us, because that path leads to the fiery pit. We can already smell the sulfur all around us. I suggest that we stop our descent and look up. At the top, outside that hellish pit is our racial hearth fire where He abides. We must fight the satanic principalities and powers of this world in order to return to our racial hearth fire. Is it so terrible to fight the principalities and powers of this world? I suppose it is so terrible if we cannot see the vision of Christ crucified, Christ risen that sustained our European ancestors in the day of battle. What would it take for the modern Europeans to see what they, the antique Europeans, saw? It would take a miracle. We find ourselves in the positon of the rich man in the Gospel of Matthew: “And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God.” The apostles ask Christ, “Who then can be saved?” His reply: “With man this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.”

The modern, scientized European has revised the Gospel parable: “It is necessary to place wealth in the hands of men like George Soros so they can create the Kingdom of God on earth.”

“Who then can be saved?”

“All those who are smart enough to reject the Christian fairy tale and support nature and nature’s God, the noble savage.”

The shroud of liberalism has descended over the people of Europe. Our resurrection will come when we love our own again, in and through the Savior, who is Christ the Lord. Dostoyevsky, in the Grand Inquisitor scene from The Brothers Karamazov, confronts modern man’s problem with God directly. The Grand Inquisitor accuses Christ of leaving man alone with his freedom. Christ promised to return, and He didn’t return, which made it necessary for the Grand Inquisitor to set up a Church based on sounder and wiser principles than those bequeathed to us by Christ. In the new Christless Christianity, there would be no quixotic ravings from St. Paul: “The foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of men.” There will only be the good, solid, practical wisdom of this-world-only in the new church. But hasn’t this new, rational church, propped up by the accumulated weight of scientific facts, been a disaster? Did Christ really leave us alone? He said He would leave us a Comforter. Perhaps it is the European people who have left Christ alone. The Comforter resides in hearts of flesh. When we left our European hearth fire to go whoring after foreign gods and clever systems, we lost the Comforter. And I do not think it is possible to make the Comforter return by diversifying our affections. I do think He will come to us if we love our own people with a greater passion than the passion of the liberals, who hate the white race with a satanic hatred that eventually will turn in upon them and destroy them. The ultimate end for the liberals will be the same as the end for Maleficent in Disney’s Sleeping Beauty. The sword of truth will pierce their hearts, and they will join the devil in hell.

There is a common theme running through all the great stories of Christian Europe. Perhaps it is best exemplified in the opera Hansel and Gretel by Engelbert Humperdinck. At the last trump, in the twinkling of the eye, when Hansel and Gretel are about to be killed by the wicked witch, the witch herself is killed. The Father tells us after the destruction of the witch, “When hope seems nearly gone, God’s relief to us is surely won.” Don’t all the classic stories of the West reenact Christ’s crucifixion and His resurrection? It seemed, when the Roman soldiers nailed Christ to the cross, that Satan had triumphed over Christ. How could anyone looking at Him on the cross believe He was the victor and Satan the loser? But Christ was the victor – He rose from the dead on the third day! How could Satan have foreseen that? He knows all about the seven deadly sins, but can His satanic mind, devoid of a human heart, ever comprehend the charity of a God who would allow Himself to be crucified because of His love for His people? No, he cannot comprehend that miracle. But he can hate what he doesn’t understand. And he has sought, through all the centuries, to instill his hatred of Christ into the minds and hearts of all mankind.

A pagan tries to propitiate his gods with sacrifice. A Christian loves Christ because He became the sacrificial lamb in order to free His people from sin and death. That is the incredible difference between our faith in Christ and the liberals’ faith in the heathen gods of color. We must recognize what the liberals have done: They have returned to heathen gods who must be propitiated with human sacrifice. And they have chosen to offer up the white race for sacrifice to their colored gods. For how long will white people consent to be the sacrificial victims on the altars consecrated to the liberals’ heathen gods?

The liberals’ unremitting attack on the white race must be met with an unremitting attack on the liberals. Their merciless religion of sacrifice without mercy can no longer be countenanced. The slaughter of the babies still in the womb, the murder of handicapped children such as Alfie Evans, the ongoing slaughter of white people, the demonization of everything white and Christian, the legalization of sexual depravity, and the worship of the sacred negro instead of the living God are all part and parcel of the liberals’ religion.

Why has there been no white resistance to liberalism? There has been no resistance because Europeans do not believe the Christian fairy tale any longer. Because they are too smart to believe in fairy tales, they doubt Christ’s resurrection from the dead. And if Christ be not risen, then Satan triumphed over Christ, and a man should be cognizant of that fact when he makes any decisions contrary to the principalities and powers of this world. It’s all right to adhere to Christianity when the powers of this world adhere to it, but when the powers of this world adhere to the anti-gospel of Satan, it is best to follow the anti-gospel of Satan. That is the logic of men and women who have lost their faith in Christ. “Let us be accommodating, let us be practical, let us obey the powers that be; so it is written, so it shall be.”

South Africa is a microcosm of our world; it is our past and our future. The white South Africans walked on water because of their faith in Jesus Christ. They created, in the midst of Babylon, a civilization worthy of the best nations in Europe. But as their faith died, they sank into the sea of diversity. Now they are being systematically exterminated, and the rulers of the Western nations, who know what is happening, ignore the slaughter, because the white South Africans must be punished for the original sin of their ancestors. And what was their original sin? They championed Christ in the midst of heathendom and brought mercy and charity to a world that was devoid of charity and mercy. For this reason they are being slaughtered. And for that reason, and that reason alone, every white male, in every white nation has been marked for death. The white females may escape death if they consent to be the concubines of the heathens of color.

Charity does indeed begin at home. But I would qualify that statement. There is no charity outside of a European home, because it is only the European people who took Christ, the source of all true charity, into their homes. No plea for mercy will pierce the liberals’ hearts. They must destroy the breeding grounds for the Christian plague, which is and always shall be the European hearth fire. In the absence of a faith in Him who has conquered the world, the white grazers will continue to appease the liberals by propitiating the liberals’ gods. But this will not save the white grazers. Only faith, the faith of Daniel and St. Paul, can stop the slaughter of the white race. If we return to our European hearth fire and defend it, we will bring the wrath of the liberals down upon us. But the liberals’ wrath is not an invincible force. It only appears invincible to men and women who have lost their faith. Jonah discovered, after spending three days and nights in the belly of the whale, that it was better to do God’s will than to live a craven, cowardly life hiding from God. If we continue to propitiate the liberals and their gods, we will discover that no sacrifice is enough. The liberals and their colored gods cannot be propitiated: The white race is guilty, no sacrifice will ever cleanse them of the sin of whiteness. Let us return home to our European hearth fire, where the one true God resides, the God who was “wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.” +

Posted in Defense of the White Race, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism | Tagged , | Comments Off on In the Lion’s Den