The Narrow White Gate

Posted on May 25, 2019 by cwny

I am a woodland fellow, sir, that always loved a great fire; and the master I speak of ever keeps a good fire. But, sure, he is the prince of the world; let his nobility remain in ‘s court. I am for the house with the narrow gate, which I take to be too little for pomp to enter. Some that humble themselves may; but the many will be too chill and tender, and they’ll be for the flow’ry way that leads to the broad gate and the great fire. – All’s Well That Ends Well

Let us begin with the four white public school teachers in New York City who were recently demoted or removed from their duties for “toxic whiteness.” The brave new world is here. The liberals have left incremental Jacobinism behind in order to proceed with the last act of the drama in which they throw off their masks and stand before us in all their satanic fury, confident that the white grazers are too spiritually gutted to distinguish good from evil and the remnant band of Europeans who can still distinguish good from evil are too few and too marginalized to resist them.

We have taken “too little care of this.” The attack on all things white, because whiteness was wedded to all things Christian, started in the devil’s workshop. The academy in church and state was and is the place where Satan reigns. It is there, where the men of intellect, unaided by hearts connected to the living God, join with Satan to go on an unsentimental journey to a mind-forged heaven on earth. Men were supposed to become as gods if they went with Satan on that journey, but they have become worse than beasts, they have become un-men.

I first heard the concept of ‘toxic whiteness’ articulated in my college classroom in the early 1970s. A radical sociology professor (are there any other kind?) called the Leave It to Beaver television show of the late 1950s an “insidiously white” show. Later, throughout the 1970s and the 1980s, I frequently heard the liberals refer to the Leave It to Beaver show as a hideous manifestation of evil. Only Walt Disney was demonized more than Leave It to Beaver. And why was Leave It to Beaver demonized? The show was demonized because it was the Jane Austen of television shows, depicting the ordinary activities of a white, middle class family (Austen’s characters were mostly white, upper class families) with warmth and humor. Why is that evil? Let’s go to the heart of the matter – whiteness is evil because whites were and are still called to be the Christ-bearing race. If you hate Christ as the liberals hate Christ, you must attack every manifestation of whiteness, because whiteness is indeed toxic to liberals and to all the non-white races who reject the God of mercy in order to serve the heathen gods of sacrifice.

We wouldn’t want to follow Wally and Beaver into their college years, because their world, the world of the 1950s and early 1960s, was the twilight world of ethical Christianity. The full-fledged faith in Christ crucified, Christ risen was gone, but the ethical remnant of that faith still remained, soon to be extinguished. Mother Goose, in The March of the Wooden Soldiers, tells us we can never return to the childhood of our race. She was wrong – through Christ that return is possible. We, like Wally and Beaver, can return to whiteness, but only if we renounce incremental Jacobinism and go all the way back to Europe, when it was white and Christian. 

The great betrayal of Christ in the 20th century took place within the ranks of the conservative intelligentsia. I do not cite the liberals as traitors, because they were and are the avowed enemies of Christ. It is the conservatives, who expressed (at least intellectually) a belief in Christ, that were and are the traitors. And their betrayal consists of this – they had no sympathetic connection to Christ through their people, they had only a Socratic belief in a mind-forged, abstract God. Without that sympathy, they became as tinkling cymbals and sounding brass, fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils. Pope John XXIII stood for all the conservatives when he expressed loving forgiveness for the black savages who tortured and murdered his fellow whites and his Catholic brethren. Is not such forgiveness genuine Christian charity? No, it is not, because without what Burke called “charitable rancor,” without a protective, loving impulse to fight for one’s own people when they are attacked, a man is worse than the heathens, he belongs to the dark angel who has made the hatred of Christ and His people his one deep and abiding passion. The godless, inhuman popes, and the think-tank conservatives, who want to preserve systems while they blissfully accept the death of their people, are one in their repudiation of that which is essential, a heart of flesh connected to God through kith and kin. They made common cause with the liberals who have made common cause with Satan. Let God judge their souls, but we shall judge their actions. They are false to their people and their God. When the conservatives in church and state bid us abandon our “charitable rancor” in the name of a nonracist, universalist love of generic mankind, we shall reject them as we reject the devil and all his works.

“See how they love one another,” was the mark of the Christian. “See how they hate one another,” is the mark of a liberal. The liberals, in the name of liberalism, have made whatever is bestial, whatever is cruel, and whatever is anti-Christian the basis of their satanic faith. It is no longer possible, now that the liberals have proceeded with the last act of their anti-white drama, to see the race war in any other light than the true light. The race war is a war of faith. Our people once believed that when Christ came to this earth, divine mercy walked among us in the flesh. We were redeemed from Satan’s power by the “heroic munificence” of Christ the Lord. Can the liberals’ hatred for whites possibly be understood without reference to the God that the whites took into their hearts and their racial hearth fire? Surely such hatred, a hatred of epic proportions, must have something supernatural that fuels it.

The liberals’ hatred comes from Satan. He cannot abide the God of mercy, because he does not believe that mankind is deserving of mercy. The Shavian sneer, the hatred of all things human and Christian, is the essence of Satan. The liberals have made the satanic sneer and the detached intellect, detached from pietas, the harrowing essence of their faith. Just as Christ harrowed hell to save poor sinners, the liberals harrow whites to save themselves from Christ’s mercy, which insults their intelligence, to build a new Tower of Babel that will place them above the angels and above the Lord God.

Kurtz, in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, looks at the evil he has done and the evil mankind is capable of and pronounces judgement on that evil: “The horror, the horror.” The democratic leadership of the West, liberal and conservative, does not look at liberalism and say, “The horror, the horror.” Without the perception that liberalism is a satanic, reptilian entity, we will be destroyed by it, because we will not have the will to resist. If we don’t feel the flames of hell when we come into contact with liberalism — “Your soul deserves the place to which it came. If having entered Hell, you feel no flame” – we will not feel the need to call on Christ, the hero of great “munificence,” who descended into hell itself in order to save poor sinners from Satan’s power. We cannot look at pure hell without being paralyzed with fear, unless we look at that hell knowing our Lord goes before us in the battle against Satan and his minions. The conservatives who will not champion that which must be conserved, their people, and the church men such as Pope Francis the Blasphemer, who court favor with the liberals and their heathen gods of color, have no problem with white genocide because they have become spiritually anesthetized; they do not feel the flames of liberalism. What is impossible for a European Christian — to live in the midst of liberals without feeling the flame — is possible for the anti-European ‘Christian’ intellectuals — they are content to live amongst liberals and become co-heirs of the kingdom of hell on earth which shall become a reality when whiteness is purged from the face of the earth.

When there is no “charitable rancor” in our hearts that makes us want to defend our people when they are the victims of cruelty and injustice, and when there is no “charitable rancor” in our hearts that makes us want to defend our honored dead and the civilization of unparalleled spiritual beauty they bequeathed to us, we become the accomplices of Satan in his assault on all things white and Christian. The late Samuel Francis and the late John Tyndall tried to get whites to defend themselves by pointing out the impracticality of liberalism – it is bad for whites in the material realm. But people won’t fight – at least white people won’t – for materialism. What is the spiritual force driving mere materialism? The liberals have a religious zeal that will destroy their white enemies unless their white enemies come at them with an unshakeable faith in the Man-God who harrowed hell.

The logical, pragmatic conservative refuses to believe that the liberals will go through with their stated plan to destroy whiteness, because he believes that common sense will prevail and the liberals will see it is against their self-interest (since they are white) to destroy whiteness. This is where mere pragmatism fails the conservative. If we see through, not with the eye, we can see that the liberals have replaced the mystery of the Christ story with a new mystery religion. They believe that they have been changed, that their repudiation of whiteness has purged them of whiteness. They believe if they endure to the end, if they love the black man and all the colored races while hating all whiteness, they will be saved. After raising Estella to hate all humanity, particularly the male half of humanity, Miss Havisham is shocked when Estella has no love for her. The liberals will be shocked when their colored minions, whom they have loved and nurtured, turn on them, but they will cling to their religion to the end, because they hate Christ and all those who believe in Him.

Is liberalism a religion? Yes, it is. The liberals have institutionalized the hatred of the white race and the love of the colored races with one exception: the colored people who embrace the white man’s religion must be purged along with the white man. The murdered black Christian Nigerians earn no tears from the liberals because they, in the liberals’ eyes, are apostates — they have left the true religion to embrace the hated white man’s God. But is the liberals’ religion a faith? Can you just create an abstract faith with no basis in reality because you can’t stand reality? The liberals’ religion is a non-faith.

When Robespierre saw that straight atheism did not work, he instituted harvest festivals in which he made his people bow down before nature. Is that faith? No, it is not. Nor is the liberals’ nature-based religion of the noble savage a genuine faith. Real faith is of the spirit and blood, it reaches into the depths of the heart. Our ancestors’ white faith was of the heart. They loved their people in and through the Savior. When the heathens attacked their hearth fires, they struck back because such attacks were directed at their people and their God, who were united in one incorporate union. That is the union, not the union of American atheistic states, or the anti-white European Union, which we must fight to preserve. If we love much, if we renew our covenant with the Christ of old Europe, we will strike back in defense of our people and our God. The first step back must be an internal conversion — we must reclaim our white souls by embracing our white Christian heritage and rejecting, as we reject Satan, all those who tell us our redemption lies in our repudiation of all things white and Christian. Within provincial, white Europe is a narrow gate that leads to His house of many mansions. Outside that world is the broad gate which leads us to Satan and his kingdom of eternal night. +

Posted in Classical liberalism, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Religion of Satan | Tagged | Comments Off on The Narrow White Gate

That Other Realm

Posted on May 18, 2019 by cwny

A kind providence has placed in our breasts a hatred of the unjust and cruel, in order that we may preserve ourselves from cruelty and injustice. They who bear cruelty, are accomplices in it. The pretended gentleness which excludes that charitable rancor, produces an indifference which is half an approbation. They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate…

That the Christian Religion cannot exist in this country with such a fraternity, will not, I think, be disputed with me. On that religion, according to our mode, all our laws and institutions stand as upon their base. That scheme is supposed in every transaction of life; and if that were done away, everything else, as in France, must be changed along with it. Thus religion perishing, and with it this constitution, it is a matter of endless meditation what order of things would follow it. But what disorder would fill the space between the present and that which is to come, in the gross, is no matter of doubtful conjecture.

-Edmund Burke, Letters on a Regicide Peace

The age of prophesy ended with John the Baptist, who stood in the long line of prophets that foretold the coming of the Lord. Once our Lord entered history, the age of prophesy was over. But there was a second tier of prophets, men of Christian Europe who told us what would happen if we abandoned the Christ of whom the prophets spoke. Foremost among those prophets was Edmund Burke. Burke, right from the beginning of the French Revolution, saw that the French Revolution was not a mere regime change; it was not an attempt by one faction of Monarchists to place a different monarch on the throne. The revolution represented an attempt to replace the Christian faith as the rule of law in order to facilitate the rule of Satan. Because of Robespierre’s maniacal consistency in that he did not attempt to dethrone Christ incrementally but all at once, Burke’s criticism of Robespierre was eventually accepted by the bulk of the European people, minus the liberals in his own party. But his criticisms of the anti-Christian nature of the underlying satanic ethos of the French Revolution – liberty, equality, and fraternity – did not have any effect on the European people. Once Robespierre disappeared from the scene, the Europeans embraced the American experiment in Jacobinism, which was and is an incremental implementation of the rule of Satan over the rule of Christ. Every single member of the new French Directory that deposed Robespierre had signed the death warrant of Louis XVI, and every single European nation that went democratic signed on to the death of Christian Europe. Prior to the American and French revolutions, the moral basis of the European governments was Christian; after those two revolutions the moral basis of the European governments was satanic.

Such an assertion, that the age of democracy ushered in the reign of Satan, seems outrageous because Satan did not immediately rear his head in the democratic nations of the West. But that is because of what Burke called “the unbought grace of life.” The ruling ethos of the democratic governments was based on the assumption that “Christ be not risen,” but the Europeans still largely adhered, until the 1960s, to the ethical code that came from a belief that “Christ is risen.” We now, in the 21st century, can see Satanism undiluted now that the unbought grace of life has been spent. There is no Christian ethos at work in the European nations because the belief that Christ be not risen has taken hold throughout the European nations. Dostoyevsky, who was a prophet as Burke was, has been answered. He posed the question, “Can an intelligent man, a European, believe in the divinity of Christ?” The reply of the “intelligent” Europeans is, “No.”

The European people have yet to come to terms, as Burke and Dostoyevsky did, with liberalism. Burke stated flatly that liberalism was from the devil: “The first liberal was the devil.” And Dostoyevsky, about 80 years later, echoed Burke in his novel The Devils, in which he warned the West about the satanic nature of the Bolsheviks. Most classical liberals, who are falsely labeled ‘conservatives,’ accept Burke’s criticism of the Robespierre Jacobins, but they fail to understand his warning that the democratic ‘ideals’ of the Jacobins, whether they were Robespierre Jacobins or incremental Jacobins, represented a flight from Christ in order to build a new European society based on the Satanic principles of the thing called liberalism.

All that was good in the democratic nations of Europe came from that remnant of grace left over from the Christian religion, which was confined to the private realm in the age of democracy. Tragically the European people mistakenly believed that democracy and science were responsible for what was good in their nations. Countries such as Denmark and Sweden seemed like paradises in the 1950s and early 1960s. They had avoided the capitalist excesses of the United States and the socialist excesses of the Soviet Union. But what happened to those nations when they spent the unbought grace of life? They lost their sense of pietas; they no longer loved their own in and through Christ, so they succumbed to the moral rot from within that accompanies sexual Babylon and the barbarian assault from without that is visited upon a people who have no faith. The incremental Jacobinism of the United States and the post-Robespierre Jacobinism of France became the ruling principle of the non-communist nations of Europe, and as a result they have all become satanic nations that worship the noble savage. The formerly communist nations of Europe, which now appear like paradises compared to the older democracies, will become like unto the Western democracies if they do not repudiate incremental Jacobin democracy. Listen to our prophets, men such as Burke and Dostoyevsky, men who had the prophetic fire of Isaiah and Jeremiah. They told us that there can never be a Christian democracy. The ethos of “Give us Barabbas!” can never be allowed to rule over our faith in the Man of Sorrows.

When Christ joined the two apostles on the road to Emmaus and heard of their sadness at His death, He gently upbraided them for their lack of faith: “Then he said unto them, ‘O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken. Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?’ And beginning at Moses and at the prophets he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.” Christ enjoins the apostles to do what St. Paul, after his conversion, enjoins us to do: search the scriptures with our hearts. The Catholic scholastics and then the Protestant scholastics who followed in their train, maintained a scholastic equivalent of “Dueling Banjos”: they sought to avoid the pitfalls of the passionate heart by appealing to reason. But reason, devoid of the passion of the heart, always becomes the servant of Satan. We can certainly fall from grace through misplaced passion, but we most certainly will fall from grace, as Adam and Eve fell from grace, if we make reason, divorced from the heart that loves, our sovereign Lord.

Strong passion under the direction of a feeble reason feeds a low fever, which serves only to destroy the body that entertains it. But vehement passion does not always indicate an infirm judgment. It often accompanies, and actuates, and is even auxiliary to a powerful understanding; and when they both conspire and act harmoniously, their force is great to destroy disorder within, and to repel injury from abroad. –Letters on a Regicide Peace

The unbought grace of life must be defended by hearts on fire with that charity of honor that motivated the prophets, St. Paul, and the European people when they were a people and not a democratic herd of cattle. The wars within Christendom were horrible, tragic affairs. Men, even Christian men, are not angels, but the evil effects of wars between Christians were mitigated by the European people’s faith in Christ. The wars of liberalism have been so much worse than the wars between Christians ever were for the reason that there is no mercy in the liberals. A Christian will extend mercy to his enemy because he feels that he too is a sinner, but the liberal will not extend mercy to his enemy because the liberal does not believe in the beginning of the Christ story. He does not believe that liberals are the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve whose humanity is tainted with original sin.

The Southern people of the United States were the defenders of Christian civilization in the northern hemisphere during the American Civil War, yet they were forced to accept a Carthaginian peace, a peace without mercy, at the close of the war. Why? Because the Jacobin leadership of the North did not see themselves as men in need of Christ’s mercy. They, like Shylock, demanded their pound of flesh, for they believed themselves to be without sin: “What judgement shall I dread doing no wrong?” The liberals believe that all sin rests with their enemies. That is why the country least responsible for World War I, Germany, was forced to pay war guilt money to the nations that entered the war on the side of the assassins. The liberals of America, France, Britain, and Russia had no mercy on their enemy. Why should they have mercy? They were without sin and their enemy was the embodiment of evil. In World War II the liberal dynamic was at work again. This time Germany was equally at fault, but why did the Western powers side with the Communists? They sided with the Communists because communism and democracy both stem from the same Jacobin roots. Communism is Robespierre Jacobinism and modern democracy is incremental Jacobinism. Lincoln, Lloyd George, Clemenceau, FDR, and Stalin were one in their Jacobinism and one in their rejection of Christian Europe.

Melville asks the question in his poem Clarel, a Pilgrimage to the Holy Land, “Wherefore ripen us unto pain?” The spiritual life is painful. If we love deeply the death of our loved ones and the contemplation of our own death is unbearable unless we believe that Christ is who He said He was. But if there is no faith in Christ, how does a person face that terror of terrors? The liberals’ solution is to avoid the depths. They have created a whole civilization – I call it an anti-civilization – based on an avoidance of the spiritual realm of existence. They must emphasize, in church, academy, and government, the material realm and only the material realm of existence lest they come into contact with the spiritual depths of life. Then they would have to face the horror of horrors without any spiritual armor. Science, and its attendant religion, Negro worship, is not a faith that can sustain us in the face of death. Science offers us an anesthetized passage from life to nothingness, and the liberals’ materially based religion helps us to be eased with our nothingness in this world by blotting out the image of God in man.

The liberals’ hatred beyond hatred for Trump can only be understood through the eyes of a Christian European. Then we can see that Trump has transgressed against the basic tenet of liberalism: that incremental Jacobinism must always move forward. What was acceptable ten or twenty years ago within the confines of liberalism is no longer acceptable once the liberals have broken down a new moral barrier. Homosexual marriage is one example. Once you give your assent to that, there is no turning back. Border restrictions and legalized abortion are two more examples. Trump has shown a sincere desire to turn back some of the incremental gains of the liberals; therefore, they must destroy him. Incremental Jacobinism has advanced beyond the Robespierre Jacobinism of the Russian communists; the liberals have incrementally killed the Christian faith of the European people. Without that faith the European people have nothing inside of them that says, “We won’t accept your world.” They accept the liberals’ world because they don’t believe there ever was any other world. We desperately need a European Puddleglum.

“No. I suppose that other world must be all a dream.”

“Yes. It is all a dream,” said the Witch, always thrumming.

“Yes, all a dream,” said Jill.

“There never was such a world,” said the Witch.

“No,” said Jill and Scrubb, “never was such a world.”

“There never was any world but mine,” said the Witch.

“There never was any world but yours,” said they.

Puddleglum was still fighting hard. “I don’t know rightly what you all mean by a world,” he said, talking like a man who hasn’t enough air. “But you can play that fiddle till your fingers drop off, and still you won’t make me forget Narnia, and the whole Overworld too. We’ll never see it again, I shouldn’t wonder. You may have blotted it out and turned it dark like this, for all I know. Nothing more likely. But I know I was there once. I’ve seen the sky full of stars. I’ve seen the sun coming up out of the sea of a morning and sinking behind the mountains at night. And I’ve seen him up in the midday sky when I couldn’t look at him for brightness.”

Puddleglum’s words had a very rousing effect. The other three all breathed again and looked at one another like people newly awaked.

“Why, there it is!” cried the Prince. “Of course! The blessing of Aslan upon this honest Marshwiggle. We have all been dreaming, these last few minutes. How could we have forgotten it? Of course we’ve all seen the sun.”

-C. S. Lewis, The Silver Chair

The venomous beast that must be killed before the European everyman can begin the journey back to the spiritual realm of existence is the great scholastic dragon. The churchmen had a choice. They could have chosen the way of the passionate heart, the way of St. Paul and those noble Europeans who followed in St. Paul’s train by holding Christ in their hearts. But the churchmen went the way of Hawthorne’s Mr. Smooth-it-away in “The Celestial Railroad” and the Grand Inquisitor in Dostoyevsky’s Brothers Karamazov. Was it ever supposed to be that easy? “Can wisdom be put in a silver rod, Or love in a golden bowl?” We do not need great intellects, we need hearts that love Christ in and through the people of Europe, whom the liberals demonize while simultaneously denying that they ever existed. Edgar’s words, “Men must endure their going hence even as their coming hither,” echo our Lord’s words, “He who endures to the end shall be saved.” The passionate heart, the European who loves much, shall endure to the end. +

Posted in Classical liberalism, Democracy, Faithful hearts, Jacobinism, Quality of mercy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on That Other Realm

The Wheel of Fire

Posted on May 10, 2019 by cwny

You do me wrong to take me out o’ th’ grave.
Thou art a soul in bliss; but I am bound
Upon a wheel of fire, that mine own tears
Do scald like molten lead

–King Lear

There is a certain practical wisdom in many of the old adages such as, ‘A stitch in time saves nine,’ and, ‘You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink.’ But some old adages are wrong. For instance, let’s take the old adage that I heard ad nauseum in my childhood, ‘Sticks and stones can break your bones, but names can never hurt you.’ Oh really? The slanderous word can and does hurt more than sticks and stones. Just look at what the word ‘racist’ has accomplished for the liberals. It has brought about the destruction of a civilization and created the most satanic non-civilization the world has ever seen.

All governing bodies, if they are truly governing bodies, must restrict free speech. If they allow the customs, manners, and morals upon which their authority to rule is based to become the constant subject for ridicule and contempt they will soon cease to be a governing body. Louis XVI did not lose his crown and his life because he was too oppressive and didn’t allow free speech, he lost his crown and his life because he did not suppress free speech. He let the pamphleteers in the press and the academy run wild with their criticisms of the customs, manners, and morals that were the foundations of the French monarchy, while refusing to suppress the Jacobin’s advocacy of liberty, fraternity, and equality as alternatives to the French monarchy.

Before the French Revolution the American Jacobins – Jefferson, Franklin, and Madison – engineered their own revolution. Prior to our “glorious” union of atheist states under the mantle of the Constitution, every single state had a denominational, Christian state religion. This is the way it must be. You cannot have a governing body that governs according to some abstract theory separate and apart from the religious faith of the people of the nation. But that is precisely what the American constitutionalists set out to do. They told their people that, “Your religion and the customs, manners, and morals that go with that religion are a private thing. What you must adhere to as your rule of law is a vague belief in the will of the people as determined by democratic procedures implemented by enlightened minds.”

So America — and all of Europe eventually followed America – became a nation governed by the principle of benign, religious indifference. “We won’t be Christian, but we will still be moral and virtuous.” But if the moral foundation of your nation is no longer the Christian faith of Alfred the Great, what is the moral foundation of your nation? Can “What is truth?” be a ruling principle? If we reject Christ, what “rough beast” will become our religious truth? The people, as defined by the Illuminati, are the ruling authority of the European nations. And who are ‘the people’? The noble black savage is the God of the descending race of the European un-men who once worshipped Jesus Christ.

The reason why the rulers of America did not suppress the 1960’s Phil Donohue Show-type of free speech – “Why not abortion? Why not gay-lesbian rights?”  etc. – was because there was no moral consensus against such things. Every society has certain boundaries that cannot be transgressed; you are not permitted to engage in ‘free speech’ on those boundary topics. For instance, the sanctity of the noble black savage cannot be challenged in our society because the noble black savage is the sum total of the European people’s faith. The belief in Christ’s resurrection from the dead and the civilization that was based on that belief can be challenged and spit upon. That tells us all we need to know about our anti-civilization and its rulers.

The liberals are not morally correct in any of their policies because liberalism is satanic, but the liberals are strategically correct. They should, now that they have absolute power, crack down on all free speech in order to retain their power. Why should they permit the slightest criticism of their regime? Who do they have to answer to? The churches? Certainly not, the churches are in the liberals’ back pocket. The white peasantry? Again the answer is no. There is no white peasantry. The Gnostic non-faith of the modern European people started in the churches, spread to the academy, and then was handed down to the masses. That new faith has killed the white peasantry. There are no integral white men left who will venture forth against the liberal leviathan, armed only with faith in Christ and David’s slingshot. Instead, white men with slide rules and calculators try to prove that it is illogical for liberals to destroy the white race.

The new liberal purges on the social media platforms of everyone to the right of Jane Fonda are happening because of the upcoming presidential election. The liberals don’t want a repeat of the last presidential election. Why don’t they just ban elections? They will ban elections in the near future if they don’t get the results they want. In the past they allowed elections to take place because the elections helped to perpetuate the myth that the people, not a liberal oligarchy, rule the nation. We all know the myth of the historical dialectic of the thesis and the anti-thesis, which is brought to a close when the people, whether they are the communists or the democratic Europeans, become the final synthesis. But the liberals will not continue with the subterfuge if they do not get the electoral results they want. If too many whites vote white, they will lose their voting rights. And they will lose their voting rights because whites are not considered to be ‘the people,’ and only ‘the people’ have rights.

It’s important to note that the liberals do not have to supply a reason for their suppression of whites. They might call the offending white a white supremacist, a hater, or an advocate of violence. All those ‘reasons’ are just subterfuges. The liberals are on a mission to build the kingdom of hell on earth, so they must crush all opposition to their regime. That is why it is futile for whites to seek fair play from the liberals. They are not committed to fair play or to any other outmoded ethical standard from the white era of the Europeans’ history. This is the new era, in which malice and hatred bear down truth and mercy. There is nothing benign in religious indifference, because people must have a religion. If they won’t have Christ, then they will be forced to worship the libearls’ savage gods of color.

The classical liberals, who are now called conservatives, are forever trying to seek redemption from the devil because they are proceeding according to the spiritual agenda of Dostoyevsky’s Grand Inquisitor, who bids us look to a man-made system rather than to the living God. “Christ’s plan for man, to the extent that we can understand it, is inefficient and impractical.” That is the substance of the Grand Inquisitor’s complaint against God. “You thought too much of men, they can’t handle their freedom. We gave them something better, we gave them a system.” The democratic system has become, for the white man, like unto the theological refuge that the Grand Inquisitors of Christian Jewry gave their parishioners. It is the armor that David rejected. But the systems, in church and state, are the devil’s snares. We have become thoroughly enmeshed in systems and lack the strength, which only comes from a faith in someone greater than the systems, to extradite ourselves from the devil’s snares.

The undergirding of the liberals’ new faith is the belief, articulated by men such as Rousseau, Diderot, Einstein, and Shaw, that the Christian faith belongs to that intermediary stage of human evolution, one step above the totem and taboo stage of mankind’s history, but well below the level of scientific man, whose religion is cosmic and intellectual in contrast to Christianity, which is provincial and stupid. But it is a curious thing – why does the ‘higher’ religion return us to the totem and taboo religion in which we bow down before the sacred negro?

At some point the European, if he is ever going to reclaim his spiritual manhood, must deal with the question of science. Can we believe, against the evidence of science, that Christ rose from the dead? If we can’t believe in that miracle then we must submit to the dictates of the men of science who bid us worship the man-gods, because there is no God-Man.

Burke in his opposition to the French Revolution articulated the alternative to the cosmic religion of humanity. He saw the old religion and its attendant code of ethics as the only religion for the European people. The new religion of humanity was a false religion without honor and without charity.

We know, and it is our pride to know, that man is by his constitution a religious animal; that atheism is against, not only our reason, but our instincts; and that it cannot prevail long. But if, in the moment of riot, and in a drunken delirium from the hot spirit drawn out of the alembic of hell, which in France is now so furiously boiling, we should uncover our nakedness, by throwing off that Christian religion which has hitherto been our boast and comfort, and one great source of civilization amongst us, and amongst many other nations, we are apprehensive (being well aware that the mind will not endure a void) that some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition might take place of it. – Reflections on the Revolution in France

And what is that uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition that has taken the place of the European people’s faith in Christ? You know what it is, because the liberals have taught us our catechism. “You shall love the sacred negro with all your heart, mind, and soul, and you shall hate the white man with all your heart, mind, and soul.” What is a white supremacist? We are never told exactly what that entity is, but those two words have the power to destroy the white race. Why do those words and the other word, racist, have the power to destroy us? They have that power because the Europeans have given liberals the power to destroy them with the devil words. If a man does not believe in the Word made flesh, he will be the slave of the devil words of the liberals. White men now spend their entire lives on this earth trying to prove that they are not racists, that they are not white supremacists, but they can never get out from under the racist-white supremacist label because when the libearls invoke those words, they mean whatever the liberals want them to mean, and they apply to any white man who impedes the liberals onward and upward march to utopia.

No appeal to the liberals’ sense of justice or their mercy will avail the white man who has fallen into their clutches. There is no justice in the liberals’ courts and no mercy in the liberals’ hearts of stone. They will follow the logic of liberalism to its ultimate conclusion. All non-illuminated whites – thee and me – must die for the sin of racism/white supremacism. Only when the white man stands up to the men with the devil words and refuses to be ashamed of white pietas will there be any relief for the whites living in the midst of liberal Babylon. Until that time the liberals will rule Liberaldom through the power of the devil words. Would the Europeans be afraid of those words if they had hearts of flesh? If they loved their God and their people, they would be fearless in defense of their God and their people. Perfect love casteth out fear. The love that once was there must once again become the animating spirit of the European people. But what are the chances that the European people can be stirred from within? Are they capable of seeing His blood upon the rose? It doesn’t appear so. There was still, in the latter half of the 20th century, a slight ethical remnant of the Christian faith left in the European people. But now even that ethical remnant has been destroyed. The love that once was there, for kith, kin, and God has been replaced by a hatred for kith, kin, and God. Through the power of his words – racism and white supremacy – Satan has severed the white European from Christ and His people. In the face of our death and the death of our loved ones we can only hold onto His promise that He has conquered death. So it is with the death of our civilization. We can only hold onto His promise that He will be with us always even in the face of death. Nothing eternal perishes! And the bond forged by the European people with Christ the Lord is an eternal bond that will sustain us in life and death so long as we refuse to sever that bond by adhering to the words of the devil instead of His holy word. +

Posted in Censorship, Classical liberalism, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Negro worship | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Wheel of Fire

The Parable of Europe

Posted on May 4, 2019 by cwny

This world is a parable—the habitation of symbols—the phantoms of spiritual things immortal shown in material shape. May the blessed second-sight be mine—to recognise under these beautiful forms of earth the Angels who wear them; for I am sure we may walk with them if we will, and hear them speak! – J. S. LeFanu

We shall always believe a lie if we seek to understand existence through the eyes of the psychologists. Their eyes see only the material manifestation of a much deeper spiritual malady, which shall always remain outside the ken of the superficial minds of the psychologists. Thus when Malcolm Muggeridge coined the term, “the great liberal death wish,” to describe the liberals of the West, he was deceiving himself and his conservative readers and only scratching the surface of the thing called liberalism. Muggeridge accused the liberals of a yearning for death, because they seemed to have no desire to defend themselves against the communist threat from without and the moral threat from within — the Babylonian sexual revolution. But if we look at the liberals at that time in 1979 and the liberals of today, we do not see any indication of a desire to die. What we do see is a desire to live free of the restraints of the Christian faith bequeathed to them by their European ancestors. They were and are like unto the devils depicted in St. Matthew:

And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way. And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time? And there was a good way off from them an herd of many swine feeding. So the devils besought him, saying, If thou cast us out, suffer us to go away into the herd of swine. And he said unto them, Go. And when they were come out, they went into the herd of swine: and, behold, the whole herd of swine ran violently down a steep place into the sea, and perished in the waters. – Matthew 8: 28-32

The liberals are in the process of drowning themselves in the sea of diversity, but that is not their desire; their desire is that thee and me shall be drowned in the sea of diversity, and that they will float above the rising waters on a celestial cloud of glory destined for the elect who have obtained, through the power of their exalted intellects, a mind purged from the evils of whiteness and freed from the burden of Christ, who bids us take up our cross and follow Him. Everything the liberals do is based on their desire to be free of the cross of Christ. What seems like a death wish from a Christian perspective is their life wish. Thus the liberals will continue to invite Moslems into the white nations, they will continue to exalt the noble black savages no matter how murderous they become, and they will continue to systematically destroy every last vestige of the Europeans’ culture when it was Christian. Any white who resists the disestablishment of Christian Europe will be destroyed.

Satan is not omnipotent, but he is much more intelligent than we are. However, he does have to work through human beings; he has to get them to buy into his agenda. How well has he done? It would seem he is doing quite well. Probably not as well as he would like, because he is never satisfied, but he certainly has accomplished something that our European ancestors never thought would have been possible: he has built Satandom on the ruins of Christendom. But it is one thing to take a fortress and another thing to hold it. We shall see how long Satan manages to hold onto his kingdom of hell on earth. It seems, now that he has conquered Europe, that he can reign in perpetuity, but there are always a few Hamlets that “know not seems.” It is those individuals that give the devil sleepless nights.

The liberals, inspired by the devil, are in the process of rooting out everything from a time when the Europeans were still ethically Christian and everything from an even more distant time when the European people were believing Christians. There is nothing too insignificant, too ‘small potatoes,’ to be overlooked. The liberals will eliminate everything from the Europeans’ Christian past. And they will eliminate our Christian European heritage in the name of eliminating racism. Think about that. If whiteness is evil, then everything white must be eliminated. But if we eliminate all whiteness, then we eliminate the only culture in which the Word took flesh and dwelt among us. That is precisely what Satan wants.

Of course it is very disturbing – no, it is much more than disturbing, it brings out an anger that is beyond anger – when the liberals hack away at everything decent and virtuous in our past in order to solidify their unholy liberal reign. The recent posthumous assault on Kate Smith was just one more liberal assault on our white heritage. The Kate Smith statue was removed from Philadelphia and her recording of “God Bless America” was banned because that kindly Virginia belle had once sung the songs, “And That’s Why Darkies Were Born,” and “Pickaninny Heaven.” Both songs, by the way, extol black virtues, as the Southern whites so often did in the spirit of noblesse oblige, but that makes no difference to the liberals. They simply look for whites who place blacks within the framework of an older white civilization and then they condemn the whites as racist, which of course means they are damned.

The banishment of Kate Smith and her recordings is reminiscent of the liberals’ ban of Disney’s Song of the South. The movie extolls what Donald Davidson called the “good darkies,” but it had to be banned because blacks were depicted in a setting in which they were subservient to whites. They were also depicted as Christians, not as drug pushers, pimps, and jive artists, but that didn’t matter to the liberals, the movie was banned as racist. I had to get my copy of it from a foreign country. But of course the damnation of Kate Smith’s recordings and Disney’s Song of the South are just two examples of the pillorying of whites by the liberal inquisition.(1) Our monuments, our art, our entire past must be eliminated in the name of “eliminating racism.” After Roxanne rejects Cyrano, he goes on a rant against everybody and everything. His friend, who knows him, says, “Say this to all the world, then whisper to me, ‘she loves me not’.” The liberals scream racism to all the world when they are pillorying white people and their culture, but what they really are saying is, “I hate Christ and His people.” Burke knew them inside and out:

The rebels to God perfectly abhor the Author of their being. They hate him “with all their heart, with all their mind, with all their soul, and with all their strength.” He never presents himself to their thoughts but to menace and alarm them. They cannot strike the Sun out of Heaven, but they are able to raise a smouldering smoke that obscures him from their own eyes. Not being able to revenge themselves on God, they have a delight in vicariously defacing, degrading, torturing, and tearing in pieces his image in man. –Letters on a Regicide Peace

Christ, when He walked this earth, said that He had to go about His Father’s business. The liberals, so long as they walk this earth, must go about doing Satan’s business. That business consists of tearing in pieces His image in man. And sadly, as the liberals intensify their attack, the churchmen intensify their repudiation of all things Christian and European. Pope Francis speaks for that hideous breed of vipers when he praises the savage gods of the rain forests and sends money to the invaders of the European nations. Tell all the world you are being kind and compassionate, then listen to the truth: “You have betrayed your God and your people in order to court favor with the devil.” As the liberals become more uncompromising, the churchmen become more compromised. At first we, the European Christians, were advised to be compassionate and open to other races and other cultures. In the name of Christianity we were supposed to compromise. Now we are no longer told to compromise, we are told to surrender to the liberals in the name of a new religion based on the worship of the noble savages of color and the hatred of the white race.

It is now, after the European people have been systematically de-Christianized, that the liberals can take off their masks. We can look directly in their faces and see the sneering face of Satan, but who is to say what is satanic? The European grazer has no moral basis to judge anything. After over a century of indoctrination, the liberals have entered the European grazer’s inmost soul and convinced him that there is no God except the gods of the liberals. While the 20th century conservatives spent their time defending democracy, the mad-dog liberals spent their time tearing to pieces God’s image in man. Of what good is democracy when your people have lost their vision of the Lord God, Jesus Christ? It is of no use to the Christian, but it is a great weapon of the devil.

When the liberals openly tell us that violence against white people is “good violence” and call for the assassination of white politicians such as Trump and Orbán, white Christians cannot become Quakers in the hopes that the liberals will spare them while killing their white brethren. But the main battle is a spiritual battle. We cannot mount a counterrevolution without having made an internal conversion from liberalism to Christ. When that happens, we will know when we must be violent and when we must refrain from violence.

Most of the violence today comes from the liberals and the colored heathens, which is supposed to be the “good violence.” The violence of the New Zealand mosque shooter is bad violence, according to the liberals, because it was not violence against white people. But all the violence, the mass shootings, strike at the core of the white culture, the culture of the antique Europeans, because at the core of that culture is Christ. Does He enjoin us to fight without taking His charity of honor into account? The liberal, the colored heathen, and the neo-pagan are one in their superficiality. They see only with the material eye so they think that only material means can be used to “get results.” It is not the promised end that Christ wants us to pursue, but it is the end result of the pursuit of Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth.

The civilization of the parables, of which the prophet spoke, “I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world,” is the civilization of the antique Europeans. Their belief in our Lord’s parables compelled them to look past the worldly wisdom of the scribes and the Pharisees to the heart of God. There is the true wisdom, there is the love that passeth all rational understanding. When we eschew the parables of Christ in which He enjoins us to view Him as “He that soweth the good seed,” to whom shall we turn? The liberals have made it clear to whom they have turned. Must we also turn to Satan in order to combat Satan? No, there is a world that our ancestors entered, through faith, that is our world. Nothing has transpired in the 20th century and the 21st century that should separate us from the antique Europeans’ world of Christian parables. Christ’s crucifixion, death on the cross, and His resurrection from the dead is still the sign of our redemption. Neither science, democracy, nor the noble savage can serve as an alternative to that sign. Is it not better to trust in Him, to believe in the parable of Christ crucified, Christ risen, than to believe in Satan’s hellish world of diversity and multiculturalism, where there is no light, no mercy, and no God? +

(1) My favorite cartoons are the Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and Goofy cartoons that Walt Disney created in the 1930s through the 1950s. But there are certain cartoons which cannot be seen in their entirety today. You can buy special “From the Vault” DVD copies in which a liberal commentator explains why the cartoons are evil (racist), and the DVDs are rigged so that you cannot fast forward past the commentary (I turn off the sound). Two cartoons that are particularly good (and therefore have been condemned) are Mickey’s Friend Friday, in which he battles, Robinson Crusoe style, black cannibals in order to save Friday. And in Spare the Rod, Donald Duck battles a liberal psychiatrist and pygmy head hunters who have escaped from a circus train. But of course the list goes on and on. The Dr. Dolittle books have been censored by Loftings’ own family because they were racist. The author of the Tin-Tin books repudiated his Tin-Tin in Africa book, and on and on it goes. There is a huge liberal bonfire raging into which the white grazers are told to throw every last remnant of our white past. And when they have completed that task, the liberals will tell the white grazers to jump into the fire themselves. Will they do it? Yes, they will, because once they have repudiated their past, they will have no way of discerning the truth. If the liberals tell them the fire is democratic, multicultural, and diverse, they will enter the fire in the belief that they will emerge from the fire cleansed of whiteness and ready to become part of Liberaldom. Of course the fire will consume them, but the grazers, having repudiated the miracle of Christ crucified, Christ risen, have decided to believe in the miraculous miracle of liberalism, which promises them a place in Liberaldom, which in reality is Satandom, if they will repudiate the one great evil – whiteness.

Posted in Censorship, Religion of Satan | Tagged | Comments Off on The Parable of Europe

The Outcast Europeans

Posted on April 27, 2019 by cwny

Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God? He answered and said, Who is he, Lord, that I might believe on him? And Jesus said unto him, Thou hast both seen him, and it is he that talketh with thee. And he said, Lord, I believe. And he worshipped him. And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind. John 9: 35-39

When the kingdom of Judah was destroyed a small remnant of Jews were sent as captives to the land of Babylon. And remarkably they remained faithful to their God while suffering through their Babylonian captivity. In the book of Psalms we read of their faithfulness:

By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion. We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song; and they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion. How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land? If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning. If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy. – Psalm 137: 1-6

The European people are suffering through their own Babylonian captivity, but they have not, like the ancient Jews, remained faithful during their captivity. Why haven’t they? One reason is that the European people refuse to admit they are in captivity. How can a democratically elected government be compared to Nebuchadnezzar? You’re right – it can’t: Nebuchadnezzar was much kinder to the Jews than the liberals are to Christians. The liberals permit state-sanctioned Christianity (which is not Christianity), but they crush any and every manifestation of a genuine, heartfelt faith in the Christ of old Europe. Yet the European people refuse to accept that democratically elected governments can be more destructive and more opposed to everything Christian and virtuous than the ‘tyrannical’ pagan kings of the Old Testament. Abortion is called ‘choice,’ white genocide is called ‘diversity,’ and the worship of the noble savage is called ‘respect for civil rights.’ Is that not tyranny? Is that not a captivity infinitely worse than the Babylonian captivity of the Jews?

The second reason that the exiled Jews remained faithful is that the Lord sent them prophets such as Jeremiah, Daniel, and Ezekiel so that they could hear the word of the Lord. Many, many times the Jewish people rejected the words of the Lord given to them through the prophets, but the Jews of the Babylonian captivity did not reject the words of the Lord.

Would the words of the Lord have had any effect on the remnant Jews if His words had not been presented to them by men with hearts inflamed with a love of the Lord? Daniel, Ezekiel, and Jeremiah were not theologians or philosophers. If they had been, they would not have been able to stir the hearts of their people. Like St. Paul, the prophets Jeremiah, Daniel, and Ezekiel were poets of God. They circumcised their hearts, and that circumcision allowed them to hear the word of the Lord God. We are not lacking philosophers and theologians in modern Christian Jewry, men who will tell us what their intellects have discovered about the nature of God. What we are lacking is men and women with hearts of flesh who know God feelingly, because their hearts are connected to Christ’s heart by way of a sympathetic connection to their people. The channels of grace are our familial and racial hearth fires; if we allow the liberals to reroute those channels of grace and direct them toward the people of other races and other faiths, we will become… We have already become, a non-people without a familial or racial home.

That which is essential to our faith, the love of Christ in and through our people, must be accepted as an unchallenged prejudice that is deeply embedded in our hearts. And we must act according to that prejudice without making it into a syllogism. A man cannot act if everything in his life must be figured out without reference to his prejudices. The church men have been neutered because their faith in Christ is a propositional faith, dependent on theology and philosophy. They place Christ outside the realm of the human heart, where all true knowledge of God dwells, and make our faith dependent on the human intellect, which translates to their intellects. And what have they come up with? Nothing that a man can believe in that will sustain him in the dark nights of the soul. The prophets and St. Paul loved much — they sought the knowledge of God through a heart to heart communion with the living God; consequently, they had something to give us – a certainty that Christ is the God who enters human hearts, that He is our Jesus who will abide with us in life and death. That prejudice took root in the hearts of the antique Europeans, and all those men and women who cling to that prejudice constitute the church of Jesus Christ. The church buildings, inhabited by men and women who have no contact with the God of the prophets and St. Paul, are the great liberal cleansing houses. They exist to purify the white Christians and make them receptive to the new Messiah, the Benamuckee of the liberals, who does not enter human hearts.

White people now take it as a given that they must hate every manifestation of white pietas. The Dalai Lama is able to see and say that Europe should belong to the Europeans and that refugees should return to their native countries, but no white man will dare to say that the European nations must be white. In fact the white Europeans now have an ingrained prejudice against white Europeans. Conservatives and liberals tell us that white nations must be diverse, which means they must be dominated, numerically and culturally, by the colored tribesmen. (1) If a white person even suggests what the Dalai Lama said openly, he is labeled a white supremacist (the label ‘racist’ has lost some of its potency due to excessive use) who must be punished either by economic disenfranchisement, imprisonment, or death.

The church of faithful hearts who love much, the church of the prophets and St. Paul, will not fail us, but the church of the scholarly minds, the really smart men, has failed us and will continue to fail us. As we sink further and further into the slough of despair, the church men still tell us not to worry, because soon they will come up with the answer to the God problem, and then all things will be set right. That will be the last word we hear as we slide into the mire of the slough of despair. But St. Paul bid us search the Scriptures with our hearts. There, in that communion of hearts of flesh with the Word made flesh, we can know our Lord.

I frequently reference the great hearts of Europe, men such as Burke, Rembrandt, Scott, Shakespeare, and Dostoyevsky, because they are part of that long line of Christian warriors who saw life feelingly, and as a consequence they bore witness to the living God. But there is an unnamed great heart who set the stage for the great hearts of Europe. He appears in John 9. I wrote about him once before in an article entitled, “The Gift of Sight.” His story is our story. And his response to the liberals of his times should be our response to the liberals, in church and state, of our times. The man was born blind, and Christ gives him sight. First, his neighbors question him:

The neighbours therefore, and they which before had seen him that he was blind, said, Is not this he that sat and begged? Some said, This is he: others said, He is like him: but he said, I am he. Therefore said they unto him, How were thine eyes opened? He answered and said, A man that is called Jesus made clay, and anointed mine eyes, and said unto me, Go to the pool of Siloam, and wash: and I went and washed, and I received sight. Then said they unto him, Where is he? He said, I know not.

Then the Pharisees question him:

They brought to the Pharisees him that aforetime was blind. And it was the sabbath day when Jesus made the clay, and opened his eyes. Then again the Pharisees also asked him how he had received his sight. He said unto them, He put clay upon mine eyes, and I washed, and do see. Therefore said some of the Pharisees, This man is not of God, because he keepeth not the sabbath day. Others said, How can a man that is a sinner do such miracles? And there was a division among them. They say unto the blind man again, What sayest thou of him, that he hath opened thine eyes? He said, He is a prophet.

When the Pharisees are unable to make the man born blind admit that he was not born blind, they decide to go to work on his parents:

But the Jews did not believe concerning him, that he had been blind, and received his sight, until they called the parents of him that had received his sight. And they asked them, saying, Is this your son, who ye say was born blind? how then doth he now see? His parents answered them and said, We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind: But by what means he now seeth, we know not; or who hath opened his eyes, we know not: he is of age; ask him: he shall speak for himself. These words spake his parents, because they feared the Jews: for the Jews had agreed already, that if any man did confess that he was Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue.

His parents wanted no part of their son nor were they interested in the man who cured him. Why? The apostle tells us that they were afraid that the Pharisees would put them out of the synagogue. Think about that. They felt no desire to know the man who made the blind to see, their own son, but they were very concerned lest they be forced to leave the synagogue. Does not that sound very familiar? The grazers of modern Churchianity do not care to know the Christ of old Europe, the Christ who made the lame to walk and the blind to see, the God of Rembrandt, Handel, and St. Paul, because to adhere to the God of those people would stink of “white supremacy” — it would result in one’s expulsion from the modern Christian synagogues of diversity and multiculturalism. But we should leave those synagogues in order to experience what the man born blind experienced when he refused to betray the man who gave him his sight:

Then again called they the man that was blind, and said unto him, Give God the praise: we know that this man is a sinner. He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see. Then said they to him again, What did he to thee? how opened he thine eyes? He answered them, I have told you already, and ye did not hear: wherefore would ye hear it again? will ye also be his disciples? Then they reviled him, and said, Thou art his disciple; but we are Moses’ disciples. We know that God spake unto Moses: as for this fellow, we know not from whence he is. The man answered and said unto them, Why herein is a marvellous thing, that ye know not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes. Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind. If this man were not of God, he could do nothing. They answered and said unto him, Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us? And they cast him out.

From whence comes the courage to defy the Pharisees who have the power to make us leave the synagogue? It comes from the love of Christ who has given us sight. We were blinded by sin and the fear of death, and He gave us the sure and certain hope that through His cross we would be redeemed from sin and death. To have been nothing, as John Donne tells us, and then to be co-heirs with Christ is something beyond the ken of the human mind. Only the heart that loves can believe in that mystery.

The man born blind is willing to be cast out for Christ’s sake, but what he gains by his rejection of the Pharisees is something so much greater than what he loses by not being a member in good standing of their church:

Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God? He answered and said, Who is he, Lord, that I might believe on him? And Jesus said unto him, Thou hast both seen him, and it is he that talketh with thee. And he said, Lord, I believe. And he worshipped him. And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind. And some of the Pharisees which were with him heard these words, and said unto him, Are we blind also? Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth.(2)

Does not every word in John 9 resonate with us today? The liberals in church and state are in the process of casting out all those men and women who profess an allegiance to the Christ of the European people when they were a people. If we cling to that God and those people, we will be cast out of the synagogues of the liberals. But what will we lose if we are cast out of the liberals’ synagogues? We might lose – no, we will lose – many of the material benefits that come with an adherence to the dictates of the rulers of the synagogues of modernity. But what will we lose if we abandon the faith of our people? We will lose that intimacy with Christ that the man born blind obtained through his fidelity to Christ and his rejection of the Pharisees. But of course there is a price we must pay for that intimacy with Christ.

Jeremias de Decker, the great Dutch poet, who was an intimate friend of Rembrandt, told us the price we must pay in two short lines from his poem, “The Passion of Jesus Christ (Good Friday)”: “Men cannot receive uncrucified, The fruit of the cross.” What is a constant source of amazement and inspiration to me is the way our people, the antique Europeans, took Christ into their hearts without flinching from the crucifixion: “Even though it is a cross that leadeth me.” Such courage, such fortitude, such faith only comes from an intimacy with Christ that the intellectual Christians can never know, and that the liberals spit on. Cannot we, the remnant band, the captives of Babylonian liberalism, take heart from the remnant band of Jewish exiles, the man born blind, and the antique Europeans, and stand up to the rulers of the synagogues? We can and we shall, because we have seen Him and because we know that it is He and He alone who speaks to our hearts. The darkness around us is deepening, but there is light. The man born blind saw that light: “And he said, Lord, I believe. And he worshipped him.” +

(1) Our enemies have such contempt for us that they openly tell us how they will destroy us. I reference once again the Moslem mayor of London, who said that for the sake of diversity we must accept the fact that London is the murder capital of the world. He invokes that word, diversity, as he would invoke the power of a magic talisman. And it works. Whites will sacrifice everything, their wives, their children, and their heritage, on the altars of diversity. If the Europeans no longer believe in the Word made flesh, they will be destroyed by the word of Satan, “diversity.”

(2) The significance of the fact that Christ sought out the man born blind when He heard that the man had been cast out of the synagogue cannot be overemphasized. We all, because we are spiritually weak, fear to be cast out of the synagogues of the principalities and powers of this world. But if we love much, if we love Him, He will seek us out. The grace of God is a living reality: the man born blind is our exemplar.

Posted in Faithful hearts | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Outcast Europeans

The Darkness Deepens

Posted on April 21, 2019 by cwny

Please see To My Readers

But let us take care. The moral sentiments, so nearly connected with early prejudice as to be almost one and the same thing, will assuredly not live long under a discipline, which has for its basis the destruction of all prejudices, and the making the mind proof against all dread of consequences flowing from the pretended truths that are taught by their philosophy. – Edmund Burke, Further Reflections on the Revolution in France

The blood of man should never be shed but to redeem the blood of man. It is well shed for our family, for our friends, for our God, for our country, for our kind. The rest is vanity; the rest is crime. – Edmund Burke, Letters on a Regicide Peace

Let me begin with Edmund Burke:

Men are rarely without some sympathy in the sufferings of others; but in the immense and diversified mass of human misery, which may be pitied, but cannot be relieved, in the gross, the mind must make a choice. Our sympathy is always more forcibly attracted towards the misfortunes of certain persons, and in certain descriptions: and this sympathetic attraction discovers, beyond a possibility of mistake, our mental affinities, and elective affections.

The liberals are holding all sorts of sympathy ceremonies for the victims who were killed in the New Zealand mosque. In my area there was a huge ecumenical ‘religious’ ceremony in which all the female clergy and most of the female laity wore some sort of Moslem headgear. Do the liberals really feel pity for the Moslems who were killed by Brenton Terrant? No, they don’t, because the liberals have separated themselves from the font of pity and mercy, they have separated themselves from Christ. Men and women who kill babies in their mothers’ wombs and then throw them on the trash heap are not, I repeat, are not full of pity for the victims in the New Zealand mosque. What the liberals are doing, laity and clerical, is showing the liberal world how virtuous they are. When white Christians are murdered by Moslems and/or black barbarians, there is no outpouring of sympathy for the victims, because when the victims are white, they are justly killed for the sin of whiteness, according to the dictates of liberalism. And when dark-skinned Christian Nigerians are killed by Moslems, there is no outpouring of sympathy for those victims, because they are considered Uncle Remuses, who have adopted a white man’s religion.

Brenton Terrant was responding to the merciless assault on his people by a merciless enemy. Where he went wrong was in responding to a merciless enemy with the same tactics used by his enemies. When Rogers, of Rogers’ Rangers fame, attacked the Abnaki Indians, this is what he told his men: “You all know what these Indians have done to New England. For near a hundred years they’ve been sneaking up on our towns and farms, cutting folks to pieces while they were still alive, roasting ‘em alive, torturing ‘em every way a sick mind could think of. Well, we’re going to put an end to that. Remember our orders – kill every fighting man among ‘em, but let the women and children alone even though they’ve killed and captured ours.” When the Christian kills, his actions must be motivated, as they most certainly were in the case of Rogers and his men, by love. And the killings that must be done in defense of those we love must be done within the confines of chivalry: “let the women and children alone.” From a purely pagan, pragmatic standpoint, it is good policy to kill the children, because they are savage warriors in the making, and it is good practice to kill the women, because they are the breeders of savage warriors. But the code of chivalry forbids pagan pragmatism. (1) The Christian does not advocate the abortion of black babies because there is a good chance that they will grow up to be black murderers, nor does he advocate the indiscriminate killing of Moslems regardless of their age, sex, or degree of culpability in the Moslem invasion of the West. I do not believe that any good can come from a response to Islamic terrorism rooted in neo-paganism, because neo-paganism, like liberalism, lacks that “charity of honor.”

Who is to blame for the shootings in New Zealand? First and foremost it is the liberals. They are allowing the Moslems to enter the white nations in the hopes that the Moslems will kill off the whites. And secondly I blame the Moslem invaders. I am against bombing them over there, in their own countries, but I am in favor of banning Moslems from the white nations. I find it astounding that the pro-Israel ‘Christians’ throughout the European nations, especially in this country, are adamantly opposed to violence against domestic Islamic terrorists and liberals who defend the terrorists, yet they have no compunction about bombing innocent Moslems over there. And they are relatively innocent when they are over there, unless you think a Christian can kill a Moslem just for being a Moslem.

It shouldn’t be hard to see that any killing that does not stem from pietas — “I will defend my own” – is evil. But the modern ‘Christians’ have reversed that simple Christian precept — It is all right to kill if the killings are state-sanctioned wars of conquest, but it is wrong to kill in defense of our loved ones. The end result of that kind of twisted theology is that white Christians have become hypocritical Quakers. They will not fight the colored barbarians or the liberals, who have ordered the destruction of the white race, but they will fight, through the state, to destroy all enemies of atheistic, Jacobin democracy.

The magnificent hymn “In the Garden” speaks of an intimacy with Christ that can only come when His heart unites with our hearts. “He walks with me and He talks with me and He tells me I am His own.” Yes, we are sinful, yes, we are imperfect, but He felt that we had something inside us worthy of redemption. The intellectual Christian puts God ‘out there,’ because ‘out there’ he can control God by keeping Him away from human hearts. That Semipelagianism has destroyed Western man. “Our intellects are pure, but our hearts are sinful.” The European Christian rejects that Gnostic perversion of the faith:

Now with zeal we must search our breasts shrewdly, the vices within, with the eyes of the heart. With the other eyes, the jewels of the head, we cannot at all see through the spirit of the thought, whether good or evil dwells beneath, so that it may be pleasing unto God at the dread time. – Anglo-Saxon Poetry

We are creatures of the heart. If we are not allowed to come to the garden alone to commune with the living God because our hearts are impure, but must only approach Him through the great wizards of the intellect because their minds are pure, then we are lost souls. We have no touchstone of reality. The non-whites still have a reality, they have never left their nature gods. But the white man cannot go back. He must have a heart-to-heart connection to the God above nature, or else he must be an outcast man, doomed to wander through the arid wastes of a mind divorced from the human heart. (2)

And in order to fortify his dried-up soul, he will worship, second-hand, the gods of nature. The liberal worships the gods of color while the neo-pagan tries, like Hitler, to revive the pagan gods of the ancient Europeans. The liberals have been more successful than the neo-pagans because their ‘noble black savage’ has a contemporary historical presence that the ancient Vikings lack. If and when the European people come to see Christ, once again, as a God who enters human hearts, they will be renewed as a people and will not acquiesce to their own destruction because the wizards of intellectual Christianity have turned them away from the living God.

Something very old and something very new has become institutionalized in the European nations. The something old is paganism, and the something new is post-Christian paganism. The old paganism was cyclic, it did not progress, it simply, like nature, repeated itself over and over. But post-Christian paganism, which is liberalism, views the historical process as an ever-evolving, ever-advancing process. History is moving, under the guidance of the liberals, toward something magnificent:

And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

In the fullness of time, the fusion of liberalism and paganism has given birth to the Prince of Darkness. He has become the ruler of the European nations by luring the churchmen away from the Christ whom we encounter in our hearts, and toward the Christ that can only be known through the minds of the philosophers and theologians. It wasn’t necessary for Satan to attack the laity directly, because once he turned the clergymen away from the living God it was only a matter of sitting back and letting nature, and nature’s God, the noble black savage, take its course. What have they, the clergymen, wrought? They have given us darkness where there was light – they have taught us that the highest form of love is the abandonment of our kith and kin, they have taught us that only great minds can know God, and they have taught us that there never was a Christian people, it was all a lie. But it was those people who said, without qualification or equivocation, that Christ rose from the dead on the third day. If those people were not Christian, if they were the source of all evil, to whom do we turn to in this world? To the modern clergymen who have blended liberalism and paganism? To the liberals who bid us worship nature and nature’s god, the noble black savage? Or do we turn to the neo-pagans who bid us worship our white genes? (3)

The conservatives in church and state, who are not conservative, have joined with the liberals in that which is essential – our apprehension of the living God. They have both placed God out there and have forbidden access to Him except through them. That is paganism:

From these things, I began to instruct him in the knowledge of the true God; I told him that the great Maker of all things lived up there, pointing up towards heaven; that He governed the world by the same power and providence by which He made it; that He was omnipotent, and could do everything for us, give everything to us, take everything from us; and thus, by degrees, I opened his eyes. He listened with great attention, and received with pleasure the notion of Jesus Christ being sent to redeem us; and of the manner of making our prayers to God, and His being able to hear us, even in heaven. He told me one day, that if our God could hear us, up beyond the sun, he must needs be a greater God than their Benamuckee, who lived but a little way off, and yet could not hear till they went up to the great mountains where he dwelt to speak to them. I asked him if ever he went thither to speak to him. He said, “No; they never went that were young men; none went thither but the old men,” whom he called their Oowokakee; that is, as I made him explain to me, their religious, or clergy; and that they went to say O (so he called saying prayers), and then came back and told them what Benamuckee said. – Robinson Crusoe

The ‘conservatives’ tell us that Benamuckee is Christ, but we must wait till they do more research and study before we can know anything about Him. And the liberals tell us that Benamuckee is the noble black savage, the Messiah, whom the prophet Jesus Christ prepared the way for. Thus the mad-dog liberal branch of the new paganism trumps the classical liberal branch of neo-paganism because the mad-dog liberals have a flesh and blood savior that they can call their own. But that god is a false God; his dethronement will come about when the European people fight their way through the wizardry of the experts and return to the God of their people. Until that time, they will be at the mercy of the liberals’ god, a god who has no mercy.

The editor of National Review magazine recently published a rousing defense of Google’s internet monopoly. Isn’t that a betrayal of the magazine’s original intent? No, it is not. National Review was always a modernist, liberal magazine just as 20th century conservatism was always a modernist, liberal movement, Gnostic in origin in that it championed a process over the reason for the process. Mary fell down at her Savior’s feet and was upbraided by Martha for a lack of respect for the process of hospitality consisting of kitchen work. For what end was kitchen work intended? It was for Christ, who bid us come to Him in the garden. If the system is all, we shall end up with Benamuckee as our god, because Benamuckee only requires external assent and sacrifice. But if we step away from the systems and seek Him in the garden, we will understand with our hearts and we will serve the living God of mercy and love. That is not a little distinction – the distinction between the gods of sacrifice and the God of mercy. It was our people who made that distinction crystal clear, and it is the modern church men and their secular partners in crime who want to blur that distinction. To what end? To go with the demon-possessed swine who went over the cliff. +

_______________________

(1) I have learned since I wrote my first article on the subject of Brenton Terrant that he did indeed target women and children along with Moslem men. We must, as Christians, condemn such actions. But that should not make us become hypocritical Quakers. And let us not be too sanctimonious. In my mid-twenties I went to visit a Roman Catholic conservative writer whom I admired. He was of Eastern European extraction and he had suffered much under the communists. During the course of a long conversation, he asserted quite casually that you had to target the communists’ women and children because they were targeting your women and children. I went away from that conversation in a state of shock. This was not the Walter Scott ethos that I expected to hear from my idol. When I had time to think over what my idol had said, I asked myself how I would have felt had I been under the communist yoke and/or I had members of my family killed by the communists. It becomes a messy business, doesn’t it? Still, in the end, my idol was no longer my guiding light. I don’t believe in going outside that charity of honor, which the best of our blood adhered to.

The Moslem mayor of London has told us that the soaring murder rate in that once peaceful city is the price we must pay for diversity. In the face of that hideous ideology of violence, and now that the major cities of the United States have become like unto Africa, we should look at how a Christian people once fought heathenism without becoming like unto the heathens.

To the credit of the British soldier be it said, that infuriated as they were by the thirst for vengeance, the thought of the murdered women, and the heat of battle, not a single case occurred, so far as is known, of a woman being ill-treated, insulted, or fired upon—although the women had been present in the massacres, and had constantly accompanied and cheered on the sorties of the mutineers. To the Sepoys met with in Delhi no mercy was shown; every man taken was at once bayoneted, and the same fate befell all townsmen found fighting against us. The rest of the men, as well as the women and children, were, after the fighting was over, permitted to leave the city unmolested, although large numbers of them had taken share in the sack of the white inhabitants’ houses, and the murder of every Christian, British or native, in the town. It would, however, have been impossible to separate the innocent from the guilty; consequently all were allowed to go free.–In Times of Peril by G. A. Henty

Let us reject genocidal policies of the liberals and the neo-paganism of Brenton Terrant for the faith and courage of the European people when they were Christian in spirit and blood.

(2) The countries of Eastern Europe and Iceland still have a chance, if they reject diversity and democracy, to avoid the bloody consequences of diversity and democracy. But they must return to their non-democratic Christian roots. That is a warning from a man who lives in the hellish pit of diversity to the men and women who are at the top of the pit: “Don’t enter the pit.” As for the rest of us? We must remain faithful while suffering through our Babylonian captivity.

(3) I realize that when a Christian European rejects the fusion of liberalism and Christianity in the organized churches and also rejects neo-paganism, he has no place to lay his head. I suppose that is why there are so few Christian Europeans. But the Son of Man also had no place to lay his head.

Posted in Chivalry, Muscular Christianity | Tagged | Comments Off on The Darkness Deepens

An Alternative Vision to Liberalism and Neo-Paganism

Posted on March 23, 2019 by cwny

Your soul deserves the place to which it came,
If having entered Hell, you feel no flame.

-Adam Mickiewicz

_________________________________________________

I read the Manifesto of Brenton Terrant the New Zealand mosque shooter. There is a certain nobility in that young man. He has a heart, which is more than can be said of the liberals and their Christian allies, who are not Christian. But I still stand by my initial response to the killings in the mosque, which I wrote last week before I knew there was only one shooter and before I read the Manifesto. It is not wrong to resist the onslaught of merciless enemies who rape and murder your people. The fact that Terrant wanted to do something about the rape and murder of his people places him far above the liberals and the false Christians of organized Christian Jewry, who see the destruction of the white race as a necessary step on the road to Utopia, which is the kingdom of hell on earth. Having said all that, I must add that the neo-paganism of the Mosleys and the Identitarians disgusts me. How can a European proceed in any action of great enterprise without taking the Man of Sorrows into account? It is true that the code of chivalry, which stems from the antique Europeans’ connection to Christ, has often been more honored in the breach than the observance, but nevertheless it was real, just as Christ’s presence in the European people was real. We can’t become virtuous pagans again, without becoming like our enemies, who are beasts of prey. The Europeans have shown themselves to be more proficient at killing then the other races, but is that ultimately our pride and glory? No, it can’t be. Our pride and glory should be in Him who saves our people from being mere biological entities fit to slaughter or be slaughtered in the biological arena. Do we belong to Him or to the dung heap? That question cannot be put aside as a poetical side issue, fit for parlor talk and playtime. It must be decided upon. If we belong only to nature as the men and women of the nature-based religions of Islam, liberalism, Judaism, and the rest posit, then let us all proceed to act like beasts, let us kill or be killed. But if, as the condemned and forgotten antique Europeans believed, condemned by the liberals and forgotten by the neo-pagans, we belong to Christ then we must proceed according to His charity of honor which tells us that we must fight as He would have us fight, extending mercy to an enemy who has no mercy.

When hell is empty and all the devils are here on earth, it becomes imperative that we follow Edgar’s injunction to speak what we feel and not what we ought to say. I feel a hatred beyond hatred for the liberals and their anti-Christian Christian allies, who have created a hell on earth that makes young men such as Brenton Terrant feel compelled to respond in kind to the deviltry of the liberals and their colored allies. And I feel a sadness and disgust that the only resistance to the deviltry of the liberals is coming from young whites who have no faith in the Christ they have never known, because the church men won’t preach Christ crucified, Christ risen, and have given themselves over to a non-faith in cosmic nothingness. Brenton Terrant is not a terrorist, he is a brave young man who responded to Islamic terrorism without the aid and guidance of the Christ of old Europe. Let us pray not only for his physical well-being as he faces the wrath of the liberals, but let us also pray that he finds the God of His people, the God who made the lame to walk and the blind to see. Christ still comes to all those who call on Him by name. (1)

If there is only going to be two forces in the world, the liberals and the colored heathens vs. the neo-pagans, with whom does the Christian side? With neither. Of what good does it avail us to gain the whole world if we lose our souls? If the liberals win, the Christian loses, and if the neo-pagans win, the Christian loses. The Christian European must not make the same mistake as the halfway house Christians. They were afraid of going it alone with Christ as their only support, so they attached themselves to the liberals who seemed to be the rulers of this world. We can’t seek to ally ourselves with the neo-pagans in the hopes that they will fight the liberals and their colored minions for us. We must fight them ourselves, in His name. If we do that, the neo-pagans with hearts of flesh will convert and bend their knees to Christ. The ones who have hardened their hearts and trust only in their minds will ultimately be absorbed by liberalism.
One thing I’ve noted when reading the literature of the neo-pagans is that they have an inordinate confidence in their ability to control history. The Christian is concerned with, “What does God want me to do?” Then he acts on that belief, leaving God to determine the results of his action. But the neo-pagan thinks that his own mind is providence. “As I think, so the world shall be ordered.” But the world will never be ordered as the neo-pagan wills it to be ordered, because existence is too complicated to be “figured out” by the human mind. We must give our wills up to Him.

The neo-pagan believes in the Father, which is his own intellect, and he believes in the Holy Ghost, which is science, but he has no Savior. The triune God is eternally part of the fabric of the European people’s history. Even when they reject Christ to form a new religion, their new religion is constructed in a perverse imitation of Christianity. The liberals have a Savior, and the neo-pagans do not. I have often wondered why the neo-pagans are so obsessed with linking their cause with Hitler. I think it is their hope that he can be the Messiah that they seek. But the liberals’ messiah, the noble black savage, seems to resonate with the European people more than Hitler does. Hitler made some noise for a time, but the egalitarians, the Jacobins of democracy, ultimately brought him down. All neo-pagans will go the way of Hitler unless they return home and embrace the Christ of eternal Europe.

St. Paul said that the last enemy which shall be destroyed is death. And yet the liberals and the neo-pagans both proceed as if they have conquered death without the aid of Christ. They both look on the survival of the species on this earth as the only realistic victory over death that is possible. The liberals want a kingdom of God on earth controlled by God the Father, which is their intellects, a kingdom which is made possible by the Savior, which is the sacred negro, and a kingdom sustained by the Holy Ghost, which is science. But can I or you or any of our loved ones be saved from death by the liberals’ religion? And the neo-pagans who tell the white man that fertility, white fertility, is necessary to rout the colored barbarians, do they tell us why we should be fertile? Our people once believed that children were a blessing, the fruits of a Christian union. If Christ be not risen, then why should we procreate? To extend our miserable lives as a species a few more years here on earth? We can’t have the fruits of faith in Christ without faith in Christ. We must have a childlike faith in “our Jesus” in order to form the type of union that results in children. Children are not weaponry to be used against the enemy, they are blessings from God. They help us to share in the sorrow of His crucifixion and the joy of His resurrection. Liberalism and neo-paganism come together on the issue of procreation. Both “religious” groups seek to wrest from God the procreative blessings which are His, and His alone, to give. And He wills that our children should be conceived and loved in and through Him. Let us leave, forever, the stink of the science laboratory and animal breeding programs to once again conceive Christian children consecrated to Christ the Lord.

While the neo-pagans either embrace the rotting corpse of Hitler, hoping that somehow he can be a savior, or while they look for another Messiah, the liberals have found their Savior. And the book of their Savior is To Kill a Mockingbird. “Stand up, your father is passing,” is the liberals’ fantasy. They are the Father, they are the great and benevolent Atticus Finch who loves his only begotten son of the spirit, who is Tom Robinson. With the support of science, which is free of prejudice, provincialism, and everything suggesting that there is anything or anyone that is above nature, the Father and the Son are worshipped and glorified. The liberals are so lost in their love of themselves and their abstract negro gods that they do not take note of the fact that the negroes hate them in their assumed role of the great Atticus Finch. They know nothing of the white man’s flight from Christ through them. All they know is that the white man is weak and does not care about his own people. So they will smite the white man and his children, even Atticus Finch and his children. The Moslems and the other non-whites also fall under the liberals’ protective mantle, so long as they hate the devil, which is the unredeemed whites. But they too will not accept the liberals’ vision of liberal greatness, and like the blacks they will kill the whites, liberal and non-liberal, with a maniacal hatred that is rooted in Satan’s hatred of Christ.

The liberals have created hell on earth, and they order us to live in it while they torture, maim, and murder us. The neo-pagans offer us a different version of hell on earth. They offer us a science laboratory devoid of light, devoid of love and devoid of God. I reject both worlds and both visions. My heart belongs to old Europe. I don’t see how it is possible to commit to any other world. When Christ asks His apostles if they too will leave Him, Peter replies, “Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou has the words of eternal life.” We can’t leave old Europe, because He resides there. He does not live in the liberals’ hell on earth or in the hellish science lab of the neo-pagans. In the old Anglo-Saxon poem called “Daniel,” the author bids us —

Consider now the holy might and wondrous works of God. We saw how He shielded the young men in the furnace from death and the leaping flames, because they served Him.

The Messiah that the prophets heralded came to us as the Suffering Servant. Our people saw their salvation in His crucifixion and resurrection. If we look at existence through their hearts, we will see that our salvation does not come to us through the sacred negro or through the minds of great white thinkers. Are we really too intelligent to believe that He is still our only hope? +

____________________

(1) Pray for Brenton Terrant. Pray as Henry Lyte prayed: “Help of the helpless, Lord abide with me.” Please Lord, abide with Brenton Terrant, in life and death, abide with him as we hope and pray that you will abide with us.

Posted in Charity, Christ the Hero, Defense of the White Race, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism, Utopianism | Tagged | Comments Off on An Alternative Vision to Liberalism and Neo-Paganism

The Discarded God of a Condemned People

Posted on March 16, 2019 by cwny

To have once been nothing, and now to be co-heires with the Son of God: That Son of God, who if there had been but one soule to have been saved, would have dyed for that; nay, if all soules had been to be saved, but one, and that onely had sinned, he would not have contented himselfe with all the rest, but would have dyed for that. And there is the goodnesse, the liberality of our King, our God, our Christ, our Jesus. – John Donne

__________________________

It is easier for me to understand the nihilist than the halfway-house Christian. I disagree with the nihilist, but I understand him. If your reason will not let you believe that Christ rose from the dead, then it follows that life has no meaning. But the halfway-house Christian, the man who professes to believe in Christ’s divinity and then rejects the aspects of the Christ story that do not agree with what he deems reasonable is impossible for me to understand. I must acknowledge the existence of such people, the halfway-house Christians, because they are legion, but I cannot really understand them from within as I can understand the nihilist.

Let me pick out one former acquaintance as an example of the halfway-house Christians that I cannot understand. He was a Roman Catholic priest in good standing with the Church. I naively thought when I made his acquaintance that since he regularly celebrated mass and recited the Nicene Creed in church he believed in the Christ story as I, a man in his mid-twenties who had gone from nihilism to faith in Christ, believed. But our two faiths were not compatible. My acquaintance did not believe in original sin as depicted in the Bible nor did he believe in any of the Old Testament miracle stories such as the Flood, the destruction of the Tower of Babel, nor the parting of the Red Sea. Did he still believe in Christ’s resurrection from the dead? Yes and no. He believed in some kind of spiritual life after death, but whether it was a personal resurrection or not was unclear to him. What was this halfway-house Christian’s passionate belief? His passion was for the negroes. He passionately believed that they, as a race, were the suffering servants whom he had to love with his whole heart, mind, and soul. Now, that modern priest was probably closer to the liberal side of the great divide than other halfway-house Christians, but all the modern ‘Christians’ have problems with some aspect of the Christ story which begins in the Garden of Eden and culminates in Christ’s resurrection from the dead. My difficulty in understanding such ‘Christians’ centers around my difficulty in viewing some of God’s miracles as more rational than others. If Christ is truly who He said He was, why is it more difficult to believe in original sin, the creation of the world, the creation of man, and the other Old Testament miracles than it is to believe in Christ’s divinity? If Christ was truly God and Man, doesn’t everything else follow? Why should we stay in a rationalist limbo, trying to reconcile the Christian faith with a watered down intellectual Christianity that is more compatible with human reason?

The Christian rationalist has no firm ground to stand on. He is forever at the mercy of the next encyclical or the latest biblical study which will tell him just how much, or how little, he is supposed to believe of the Christ story. Thomas Hughes spoke to that very issue over a century ago:

At the same time, as we also know that the methods and principles of historical investigation are constantly improving, and being better understood, and that the critics of the next generation will work, in all human likelihood, at as great an advantage in this inquiry over those who are now engaged in it, as our astronomers and natural philosophers enjoy over Newton and Franklin — and as new evidence may turn up any day which may greatly modify their conclusions — we cannot suppose that there is the least chance of their settling the controversy in our time. Nor, even if we thought them likely to arrive at definite conclusions, can we consent to wait the result of their investigations… Granting then… that if these facts on the study of which they are engaged are not facts — if Christ was not crucified, and did not rise from the dead, and ascend to God His Father — there has been no revelation, and Christianity will infallibly go the way of all lies, either under their assaults or those of their successors — they must pardon us if even at the cost of being thought and called fools for our pains, we deliberately elect to live our lives on the contrary assumption. It is useless to tell us that we know nothing of these things, that we can know nothing until their critical examination is over; we can only say, “Examine away; but we do know something of this matter, whatever you may assert to the contrary, and mean to live on that knowledge.” – Alfred the Great

St. Paul enjoined us to keep in memory “that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures; And that He was buried and He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures;” That Christ rose from the dead “according to the Scriptures” was the faith that sustained our people against the pestilence that walketh in darkness and the destruction that wasteth in noonday. We have succumbed to the pestilence of liberalism and are being destroyed by the colored heathens because we have lost our connection to the living God. We can’t know Him without hearts that love much, and we can’t love in the abstract, we must love our own, the people of our racial hearth fire, or we will not have the heart to love God. Our minds might assent to the basic tenets of Christianity, but if our hearts are not moved by Christ, our faith is as a sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal. The 20th century conservatives in the church who wanted to conserve the church while jettisoning the European people, and the conservatives in the secular society who wanted to conserve our democratic institutions while jettisoning the European people, were not conservatives. They were the aiders and abettors of the outright liberals who wanted to attack Christ through His people. If you won’t defend the people who took Christ into their hearts, you are, in essence, leaving Christ behind and forging ahead with the liberals who have adopted a strange new God who requires sacrifice and rejects mercy.

In my lifetime I have seen the completion of the transformation process of the devil. Europe and Christ used to be synonymous. Ben Gunn said he had not eaten a Christian diet for three years on Treasure Island. There was no need for him to say he had not eaten a European diet because Christian and European meant the same thing. Now when you link the antique Europeans with Christ in ‘Christian’ circles, when you speak of the covenant between the ancient Europeans and Christ, you are treated like a pariah. How can you claim that racists were one with Christ? Is not racism the original sin? No, it is intellectual pride, pride in our ability to place God out there, away from our racial hearth fire, and proceed according to our own abstract idea of God, that is the original sin. Pietas is the way to God; it does not lead us away from God. When you proscribe the European hearth fire, you have proscribed the living God. The flood of non-European people into European countries is the equivalent of a satanic reversal of Christ’s incarnation. When the ‘Dream of the Rood’ Europeans took Christ into their hearts, He became incarnate in Europe. Now that the liberals have demonized Christian Europe and opened up the floodgates to the colored heathens, Satan has become incarnate in Europe.

Satan did not ask Adam and Eve to deny God, he bid them expand their knowledge of God. They were told to give up the provincial, sentimental God who cared for His children, in order to become full partners with a cosmic God. The devil was a Chardinian. Under the guidance of the liberals, the European people have participated in a second fall of man. They rejected the little way, the narrow path of love that Christ chose when He took flesh and dwelt among us, for the broad path of cosmic knowledge. Do we really know God better now that we do not love our people? It seems to me that we have lost God now that we no longer love our people. We are passengers on a plague-infested ship, piloted by the devil.

Anthony Jacob, who was banned from all the 20th century conservative publications, wrote that “charity not only begins at home, it perishes without one.” Burke wrote about, “that charity of honor,” which sustains a Christian people. Both men, Burke and Jacob, were true conservatives. They wanted to conserve their people, who were white and Christian. That should have been the goal of all the men who claimed to be conservative, but it wasn’t. They sought to preserve an abstract, universal, conglomerate called ‘the people’ who were loyal to a remote, abstract God who could only be presented to ‘the people’ after he/she/it was dissected, analyzed, and purged of racism, sentimentality, and provincialism. Who is that purified God? Behold, it is the sacred negro.

The little Christ born in a stable in Bethlehem became the savior of the world. The great cosmic Christ born in the minds of Christian rationalists became an inconsequential God who lives only to rubber stamp the decrees of liberalism. It is now verboten in ‘Christian’ circles to invoke the Christ of old Europe. We are enjoined to look to the new, streamlined Christ, who cannot save, He can only provide comfort and support to the liberal elect who seek to build a kingdom of God on earth. In that kingdom, the liberal elect, who have purged themselves of whiteness, will take charge of the eternal religious festival dedicated to the colored gods who have redeemed us from… What, pray tell, do they redeem us from? Do they redeem us from death? No, but they do redeem us, if we worship them, from the original sin of racism. But then again do they really redeem the white man from the sin of whiteness? The reality of the liberals’ brave new world seems to contradict their theory. No matter how devoutly the liberals worship the sacred negroes, no matter how subservient the white grazers are to the sacred negroes, “thou art a sinner because thou art white” is still stamped on the foreheads of the liberals and the white grazers. Is there no atonement in the new religion? No, there is not. There can be no atonement, for the unpardonable sin of whiteness. Shouldn’t that tell us something, shouldn’t that tell us everything, about the new religion? Can a savior who has no mercy be a savior? Why were our people’s hearts drawn to Christ? Was it not because He, through His divine charity, redeemed us from sin and saved us from death? Why is that vision of the living God, the vision of the proscribed and condemned antique Europeans, now an anathema and the new vision of the merciless gods of color the ruling orthodoxy? Must the European people remain forever in their self-imposed exile from their people and their God all because of ‘racism,’ that man-made bogeyman who keeps the liberals’ kingdom of eternal night in order?

My children never went to ‘school,’ because they were educated at the parental hearth fire. Their religious education consisted of the literature of the West and the Bible. It was truly amazing to see how the literature of the West commingled with the Bible. The history of our people is the retelling of the Christ story. If you try to eliminate the Christ story from our people’s history, you eliminate our people. And conversely if you try to eliminate our people from the Christ story, you eliminate the Christ story as a historical reality. You make it an abstract theory. St. Paul’s “according to the Scriptures,” becomes “according to the abstract theories of really smart men.” And those smart men have given us a Gnostic God who is everything and nothing. He is too weak to be a savior, so he has given way to the new black Messiah. Our people, when they were a people, had a heart to heart covenant with the living God. Donne’s ode to “Our Jesus,” which was the lay of the antique Europeans, must be our faith while the lay of the liberals who sing of the colored gods of sacrifice must always be an anathema to us. In the name of the God of Mercy, we must cling to the Christ-centered hearth fire of the European people.+

______________________

Addendum: Let’s be clear about the liberals’ fake tears for the victims of the shootings in the mosques in New Zealand. The liberals do not care about the death of Moslems. They do not care about the death of anyone, with the exception of their own illustrious selves. Bush and Blair killed millions of innocent Moslems with the consent of the liberals. The liberals will use this shooting to clamp down on white people who advocate, by word or deed, that white nations should remain white. “Terror has no religious affiliation,” the liberals intone. Don’t believe them. Islam is a religion of terror and so is liberalism. Legalized abortion is terrorism, the massive bombing of civilian populations is terrorism, and on the Moslems’ ledger is a legacy of bloody terror against white Christians. So was the shooting justifiable? You could make a case that it was; are not all Moslems by what they profess potential terrorists? Yes, they are. But still, my heart did not soar within me when I heard of the shootings as my heart soars when I hear of the shooting of an abortion doctor or as it would soar if I heard of the shooting of a violent Jihadist or a black murderer and rapist. A Christian should not live in the land of theory. Even though you can make a theoretical case for the shooting of all members of a religious sect that advocates terror, we must listen to our Christian hearts, which recoil at the indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, even if the civilians are members of a religious body, liberal or Moslem, opposed to white Christians. A Christian has the added burden of fighting within the moral parameters of his Christian faith. That puts him at a disadvantage when he fights enemies who have no moral parameters. But that is our cross, a cross that our Savior, in my judgement, wants us to bear.

The halfway-house Christians will rush to condemn the perpetrators of the shooting. They will not be full of loving forgiveness for the men who did the shootings, because the shooters were not members of a liberal-sanctioned religious sect. They were, in the vernacular of the liberals, ‘white supremacists.’ But they are not the moral pariahs the liberals claim they are. White self-defense is not morally reprehensible. But we see, in these shootings, the insufficiency of white self-defense that is not grounded in the Christian faith. The mark of a Christian is not that he doesn’t fight, the mark of a Christian is that he discriminates when he fights, between the militant, aggressive enemies of his people and the non-militant civilians who had the misfortune to be born into a false religion.

I realize that it is simpler to take either an ‘all violence is wrong’ stance, or a ‘by any means necessary’ stance, on the subject of white self-defense.  But I can’t do that. The liberals and their heathen allies must be resisted. They are violent and merciless and we must resist them. With violence? Yes, with violence. But should our violence be without mercy? No, there is the difference between us and them. We must temper our violence with mercy. There will be no mercy for the shooters in this case, because they are white. But they should be shown mercy, because they are not as responsible for the killings as the liberals who let the Moslems into New Zealand and the Moslems who declared war on white Christians. But nevertheless, we must hold out for Christian warfare, which extends mercy to the enemy, a mercy that seems to be lacking in the men who did the shootings in the mosques.

The liberals have no problem with bombing Moslems over there, because over there, they are the enemies of liberalism. But they do have a problem with killing Moslems in white nations because over here the Moslems are part of an invading army that are doing what the liberals desire: they are destroying the white race.

Posted in Defense of the White Race, Europeans and Christ, Halfway-house churches, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Discarded God of a Condemned People

A Mystery

Posted on March 9, 2019 by cwny

But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: – I Corinthians 2: 7

_____

For it is only through our mysterious human relationships, through the love and tenderness and purity of mothers, and sisters, and wives, through the strength and courage and wisdom of fathers, and brothers, and teachers, that we can come to the knowledge of Him, in whom alone the love, and the tenderness, and the purity, and the strength, and the courage, and the wisdom of all these dwell for ever and ever in perfect fulness. – Tom Brown’s School Days

__________

St. Paul enjoins us to believe in Christ’s mysterious, divine charity: “Behold I shew you a mystery: we shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed. In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.”

It was the devil’s self-appointed task to destroy, through his liberal minions, the Europeans’ faith in Jesus Christ by attacking that mystery which St. Paul writes about and Handel put to music. Truth, the liberals tell us, cannot be mysterious, it must be rational and scientifically verifiable or it is not truth. Where is the scientific evidence that Christ rose from the dead? And where is the scientific evidence that those men and women of old Europe who believed that Christ rose from the dead are with the Lord, body and soul, even though they are dead and buried? There is no scientific evidence to support the major tenets of the Christian faith, nor is there a rational explanation for the Trinity, the virgin birth, original sin, or the creation of man from the dust of the earth and the creation of woman from the rib of man. So isn’t it time to leave the age of credulity and enter the new age of science and reason? “Yes, it is time to leave the age of credulity,” the liberals tell us. “That is why we have taken the reins of government in church and state.” One thinks of the prophetic words of Isaiah: “And the government shall be upon His shoulders.” Yes, the government should be upon His shoulders, not the liberals’ shoulders. But before we leave the credulous antique Europeans behind, let us look at the new mystery religion that has replaced Christianity.

The gods of the pagan Greeks succumbed to rationalism, and as a result the Greeks succumbed to the Romans. But the Roman gods were mere state gods, they no longer had any mystery. The mystery religions replaced them in the hearts of the people. Christ did not conquer the mystery religions because His story was rational and scientific, He conquered the mystery religions because His incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection from the dead was a greater mystery than that of the mystery religions. (1) The pagan Greeks and Romans watched their civilizations die because they failed to realize that rationalism kills mystery and without mystery there can be no faith. And what happens to a people without faith? They die out as a people.

St. Augustine quite naturally thought the coming of the ‘barbarian’ hordes, the European tribesmen, meant the end of civilization. He wanted to give the faithful something to hold on to, so he invented a false concept of the Church. The Roman organization became, in Augustine’s mind, the true Church. Everything outside of that Church was the city of man, which was evil. Catholic and Protestant theologians have differed on many things, but they all have remained under the spell of St. Augustine regarding the church of Christ. They do not believe that the Word of God is passed on from heart to heart; they believe it must be passed on through mind-forged organizations consisting of smart men who hammer out creeds and special bulletins about God and then pass their findings on to the faithful. And the main purpose of those creeds and bulletins is to destroy the mystery of Christ crucified, Christ risen so that their rational formulations of the essence of Christianity can take center stage. It is not a question of St. Augustine or Aquinas. Nor is it a question of Aquinas or Calvin. It is a question of St. Paul and the circumcised heart versus the mind-forged theories of theological experts who thought, and still think, that Christ can be put in a scientized box and played upon as Rosencrantz and Guildenstern sought to play upon Hamlet.

HAMLET. I do not well understand that. Will you play upon this pipe?

GUILDENSTERN. My lord, I cannot.

HAMLET. I pray you.

GUILDENSTERN. Believe me, I cannot.

HAMLET. I do beseech you.

GUILDENSTERN. I know no touch of it, my lord.

HAMLET. ’Tis as easy as lying: govern these ventages with your finger and thumb, give it breath with your mouth, and it will discourse most excellent music. Look you, these are the stops.

GUILDENSTERN. But these cannot I command to any utterance of harmony. I have not the skill.

HAMLET. Why, look you now, how unworthy a thing you make of me! You would play upon me; you would seem to know my stops; you would pluck out the heart of my mystery; you would sound me from my lowest note to the top of my compass; and there is much music, excellent voice, in this little organ, yet cannot you make it speak. ’Sblood, do you think I am easier to be play’d on than a pipe? Call me what instrument you will, though you can fret me, you cannot play upon me.

The conquest of Rome by the European tribesmen was providential, because the Europeans, when they bent their knees to Christ, did not bend their knees to the Roman system. Why should they bend their knees to a system they had defeated? They bent their knees to a God whose heart was greater than the heart of Odin:

The Nordic religion was not a religion of dread, or of magic formularies to propitiate hostile powers. Instead of covering its temples with frescoes of the tortures of the damned, it taught people not to be afraid of death. Its ideal was the fellowship of the hero with the gods, not merely in feasting and victory, but in danger and defeat. For the gods, too, are in the hands of fate, and the Scandinavian vision of the twilight of the gods that was to end the world showed the heroes dying valiantly in the last hopeless fight against the forces of chaos—loyal and fearless to the last. It is an incomplete but not an ignoble religion. It contains those elements of character which it was the special mission of the Nordic peoples to add to modern civilization and to Christianity itself.

—History of England by G. M. Trevelyan

The central conflict throughout the Christian centuries of Europe has been between the churchmen, the intellectual Christians who wanted to turn the mystery religion of Christ crucified, Christ risen into a scientized philosophy, and the European people who loved much and wanted to hold on to the Christ of St. Paul and the Apostles. The conflict finally ended in favor of the churchmen when the preponderance of scientific facts, and the alliance of the churchmen with the liberal proponents of scientific facts, convinced the European people to give up on the Christ of the Gospels and St. Paul.

It seems too obvious to have to be stated, but that has been Satan’s goal all along – to obscure the obvious Gospel truth that Christ comes to us through the heart, in order to make us believe that we cannot know God unless we find the right ‘system.’ The great system never comes – it is always in the future, a future that can only be realized if we repudiate the past where Christ dwells with our people. In the meantime, we still need a religion. That is where the liberals step in. They kept debunking the Christ story because it was a mystery that defied science and reason, while they handed mankind a new mystery religion that was just as irrational and unscientific as the religion they rejected.

The centerpiece of the liberals’ new religion is the noble black savage. Feminism, legalized abortion, legalized sodomy, transgenderism and every other evil under the sun are part of the liberals’ mystery religion, but the various parts of their religion are held together by the worship of the sacred negro. Just as Christ is the cornerstone of the Christian faith, so is the negro the cornerstone of the liberals’ faith. While the churchmen have taken great pains to divest Christianity of its mysterious, irrational elements, thus destroying the faith, they have also taken great pains to embrace the mystery of liberalism, which is the mystery of the noble black savage. How can men who do what blacks do – rape, murder, and pillage – be sacred entities? And how can we, mortal men who must die, expect to be saved from death by the worship of the noble black savage? “Ah, that is the great mystery of our faith,” the liberals tell us in rapturous ecstasy. But must we submit to the liberals’ mystery religion?

If a man believes that this world is all there is, he will embrace the liberals’ new mystery religion, because it is the religion of the powers that be. And if a man wants to have success in this world and keep open a possibility of some position in the next world, which may or may not exist, he will embrace organized Christian Jewry, which combines the worship of the negro with a cookie-cutter Christianity. But what if a man loves and hates with the same passion as the ancient Europeans, the men who left Odin for Christ? Such a man will not bend his knee to the liberals’ mystic negro, nor will he compromise with the Christian philosophers. He will have all or nothing: he will have the Christ story with all its mystery, all its tragedy, and all its triumph.

“Why should you not explain the mystery of God in logical, rational terms? Are you afraid that your faith cannot stand up to reason?” Such is the refrain of the great rationalists throughout the Christian centuries of Europe – the Shaws, the Russells, and the Voltaires. And the theologians have taken the bait. They approached God with slide-rules and dissecting kits in order to pluck out His mystery. Is that how we know the living God? Christ called a little child unto him and said, “Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the Kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.” It is the poetic of our people to which we must cling, their childlike trust in His promise that we need not fear the world because He has overcome the world. Christ did not try to explain the tragedy of life away, instead He drew us to His sacred heart so that we would be able to see our redemption in His sacrifice on the cross. The antique Europeans understood the mystery of Christ crucified, Christ risen, because they, like unto a child, understood the Christ story with their hearts rather than with their rational, empirical minds.

We cannot approach God in the spirit of internet trolls and expect to see the Kingdom of Heaven. There is more wisdom in Robert Louis Stevenson’s A Child’s Garden of Verses than in all the theological tomes ever written. Why? Because there is a reverence for the mystery of a Christian hearth fire in those poems of Stevenson’s childhood. Without that reverence, we will surely die out as a people, and we will not, as individuals, have any contact with the living God. The mark of a man is not that he kneels to no-one. The mark of a man is determined by whom he kneels to. Our people once knelt in “humble adoration” to Christ. If that seems foolish to the philosophical trolls and is a stumbling block to the Jews and the neo-pagans, then so be it. We will cleave unto Him, because the mystery of His loving charity is the mystery that speaks to our hearts:

THE UNSEEN PLAYMATE

When children are playing alone on the green,
In comes the playmate that never was seen.
When children are happy and lonely and good,
The Friend of the Children comes out of the wood.

Nobody heard him and nobody saw,
His is a picture you never could draw,
But he’s sure to be present, abroad or at home,
When children are happy and playing alone.

He lies in the laurels, he runs on the grass,
He sings when you tinkle the musical glass;
Whene’er you are happy and cannot tell why,
The Friend of the Children is sure to be by!

He loves to be little, he hates to be big,
‘Tis he that inhabits the caves that you dig;
‘Tis he when you play with your soldiers of tin
That sides with the Frenchmen and never can win.

‘Tis he, when at night you go off to your bed,
Bids you go to your sleep and not trouble your head;
For wherever they’re lying, in cupboard or shelf,
‘Tis he will take care of your playthings himself. +

_______________________________________

(1) If the Christian rationalists would leave the stage and let Christ’s Gospel stand alone against the liberals’ mystery religion, Christ would triumph once again. It is our duty to see that the Christian rationalists cease their intellectual warbling and listen to the forgotten voice of the ancient European people who understood the mystery of Christ crucified, Christ risen, because they saw life “feelingly.”

Posted in Antique Christianity, Charity, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Rationalism, Scientism | Tagged , | Comments Off on A Mystery

The Return to Damascus

Posted on March 2, 2019 by cwny

And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. – Acts 9: 3-5

_____

It is painfully obvious from a Christian perspective that the liberals have triumphed over the Christian Europeans. The Christian channel of grace, the familial and racial hearth fire, has been dammed up so that liberalism can live into perpetuity, and Christian Europe will remain a dead letter. And liberalism, a religion that adheres to the doctrine that whites are evil and the colored heathens are godlike, will remain the religion of the European people until what is Christian is no longer synonymous with the doctrines emanating from the organized Christian churches.

__________

The French Jacobins and the American constitutionalists (Jefferson, Franklin, and Madison were not Christians) were determined to live by a faith that was not dependent on the Christian’s God. The American experiment in atheism was not as sudden and drastic as the French Revolution, but it eventually became like unto the French Revolution in the 1860s when the Jacobin government of the North waged a merciless war against the Christian South. But it was not till the early part of the 20th century after World War I that the white intelligentsia of the European nations completely cut their ties to the Son of God. It became impossible in the aftermath of World War I for the intelligent European that Dostoyevsky spoke of to believe in the divinity of Christ and the mercy of God. That feeling of God-forsakenness was the mark of the ‘intelligent’ European after World War I and continued to be the mark of the European intellectuals through World War II.

During the period between the wars, the existentialists took center stage. ‘Existence precedes essence’ was their mantra, and under that banner they proclaimed the death of God. But men cannot live without a religion. The pure atheism of men such as Sartre, Becket, and Camus gave way to the worship of the noble black savage and other savages of color. But it was the existentialists, who claimed that reality was their raison d’être, who paved the way for negro worship, feminism, and all the other satanic –isms, because if the pure horror of existence makes the existence of a loving God impossible, then men are free to pursue other gods. And the European people have done just that – they have pursued the gods of liberalism.

There were Christian responses to the existentialists, but the problem with the responses was that they were based on the false assumption that God could be handed to mankind in the form of a computer printout: “Here, this will explain the ways of God to men.” The Christian apologists were like the ape who disguised a donkey as Aslan in C. S. Lewis’s book The Last Battle. When the donkey was unmasked, the dwarves did not turn to the real Aslan, they rejected Him as well — they were not going to be fooled again. The churchmen went into battle with false theories about the essence of God, and the end result of their theorizing was the destruction of the people’s faith in the real Christ, the Christ whose existence precedes and transcends all the essences the human mind ever conceived of. The existentialists only defeated a caricature of Christianity, they did not defeat the living God.

The Christ of the Gospels, the Christ whom the European people loved before they became too ‘intelligent’ to love a fairy tale God, was not brought into the lists against the existentialists. The remote computer printout God was considered sufficient. But we need our exiled Savior. “Will He no come back again?” No, He will not come back again so long as the mind-forged Christ, the false Aslan of the theologians, remains in the organized churches. That Christ is compatible with negro worship, feminism, and the hatred of the European people’s vision of the living God. We can’t have two Christs. If the Christ of old Europe is not the living God, then we are of all men most to be pitied, because the Christ of modernity is not the God who saves.

In Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure, the cynical, superficial Lucio tells the Duke, who is in disguise, that he knows the Duke and loves him. Yet he has nothing but bad things to say about him.

LUCIO. Sir, I was an inward of his. A shy fellow was the Duke; and I believe I know the cause of his withdrawing.

DUKE. What, I prithee, might be the cause?

LUCIO. No, pardon; ’tis a secret must be lock’d within the teeth and the lips. But this I can let you understand, the greater file of the subject held the Duke to be wise.

DUKE. Wise? Why, no question but he was.

LUCIO. A very superficial, ignorant, unweighing fellow.

DUKE. Either this is envy in you, folly, or mistaking. The very stream of his life, and the business he hath helmed, must, upon a warranted need, give him a better proclamation. Let him be but testimonied in his own bringings-forth, and he shall appear to the envious a scholar, a statesman, and a soldier. Therefore you speak unskilfully; or, if your knowledge be more, it is much dark’ned in your malice.

LUCIO. Sir, I know him, and I love him.

DUKE. Love talks with better knowledge, and knowledge with dearer love.

The whole history of the European people and their break with the living God is contained in that exchange. Christ did not come to us in power and might so that we could know with rational certainty that He was the Son of God. If He just wanted our minds He would have come down off the cross when the chief priests, the scribes, and the elders mocked Him: “If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.”

Christ wants our hearts. David and Mary Magdalene found favor with God. Why? Certainly not because they were great sinners. They found favor with the Lord because they had hearts that loved much. They had the knowledge of God that stems from the love of God. Loving knowledge binds us to Him while mere catechism knowledge creates a gulf between us and Him. The miracle of our people, when they were a people, was that they followed the path of loving knowledge and forsook the path of intellectual knowledge divorced from the heart which loves. The loving heart knows the beloved: the scientized intellect knows nothing. The cold obituary in the newspaper that describes the mother, father, or spouse you loved hardly describes the loved one. It is you who loved them that really knew them. The church of Christ consists of those men and women who love Christ as St. John and St. Paul loved Him.

Why did St. Paul bid us circumcise our hearts instead of opening up our minds? He wanted us to see the Christ he encountered on the road to Damascus, the Christ who enters human hearts. That is the Christ the liberals flee from like the devils in the Gospel who begged our Lord to let them enter the swine. And that is the Christ whom the churchmen have replaced with their computer printout God, who rubber-stamps the sacred decrees of liberalism. It’s not possible for a loving heart connected to Christ’s sacred heart to accept the fusion of liberalism and Christianity, while condemning the antique Europeans as unChristian because they loved their own people. “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose,” and he can cite church documents and use theology for his own purpose. If that is so, how does the European Everyman separate truth from falsehood? It is impossible unless we go through the narrow gate that the liberals and the churchmen have barricaded and placed sentinels in front of to stop anyone from attempting to break through the barricade. But we must break through. The heart that truly loves will not be satisfied to live outside of his racial hearth fire where there is no mercy, no love, and no Savior.

In the short story “The Man Who Saw Through Heaven,” Wilbur Daniel Steele depicted an evangelical minister who lost his faith when he went to an observatory and stared at the heavens through the instruments provided to him by scientists. He had a road to Damascus experience in reverse. He replaced Christ with nature and nature’s gods. His road to Damascus story in reverse has been the story of the 20th and 21st century Europeans. They think they have seen the living God in science, which will save them from the existentialists’ vision of nothingness. But what if the prophets, the apostles, and the antique Europeans were the true existentialists? What if the fairy tale is true? Just because our scientized brains tell us that Christ be not risen does that mean that darkness is right? There is a subterranean current of our lives, if we do not let go of the vision of our heart, that draws us to the Christ story in its entirety. Like Posthumus in Shakespeare’s Cymbeline, who sees the heavenly vision with his heart: “The action of my life is like it, which I’ll keep, if but for sympathy,” and St. Paul, who sees Christ darkly through a heart circumcised by the love of Christ, the European can see the living God if he leaves the road that leads away from Damascus and returns to the road to Damascus where he will encounter, once again, the living God whom St. Paul and the antique Europeans knew and loved.

I rejected the modern world in my mid-twenties when I came to believe in the Christ of old Europe. As the shadows of modernity lengthened and engulfed all of what was once Christendom, I became conscious of the fact that I was a man in exile. There was nothing left of my people and their faith. And the most striking contrast between my people, the antique Europeans, and the modern Europeans, was the complete absence of the prophetic fire in the modern Europeans. The prophets who told us of the coming of the Lord had passionate hearts that enabled them to hold on to their faith in the living God despite the opposition of the Jezebels and the Ahabs. What happened to that passionate, prophetic fire? Was it no longer necessary once Christ took flesh and dwelt among us? That cannot be true. It is the prophetic fire, the passion for a connection to the living God, that enables the Christian to pass on the faith from one faithful heart to another. We can’t become lukewarm exponents of a Socratic Christ without losing our faith in the passionate Shepherd who died on the cross for our sins. In all the fairy tales that come from the heart of old Europe, a rescue comes at the last moment – “When hope seems nearly gone, God’s relief to us will surely come.” But does real life, our existential life here on this earth, really work that way? Where is God’s relief to us? The relief has come and is with us now, even unto the ending of the world, but we cannot avail ourselves of that relief unless we possess the prophetic fire that sustained Elijah in the desert and our people throughout all the Christian centuries when they strove so mightily to maintain the prophetic fire. I love them now and always – they are my people and they have borne witness to our Jesus, the God of our ascending race. +

Posted in Blood faith, Christ the Hero, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Return to Damascus