Doubt and Faith

Posted on August 3, 2019 by cwny

Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. – Matthew 5: 4

What are we to make of, “Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus”? When Jesus said that He intended to go into Judaea again, His disciples advised Him not to go there. “Master, the Jews of late sought to stone thee; and goest thou thither again?” When Jesus makes it clear that He will go back to Judaea, Thomas says to his fellow disciples, “Let us also go, that we may die with him.” Is there any greater loyalty than that? Thomas knows Christ cannot hope to survive if He goes to Judaea, but nevertheless he decides to stand by Christ to the end. Yet that same Thomas, also called Didymus, declares, after the risen Lord appeared to the other disciples when Thomas was not present, “Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my fingers into the print of nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe.” We know how that story ends:

And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you. Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed. John 20: 26-29

Through all the Christian centuries the label “doubting Thomas” has been applied to those who lack faith. Is the label unfair? Well, Thomas does doubt His Lord. But would any of the other apostles have fully believed in Christ’s resurrection from the dead if they had not been present when He appeared to them in the flesh? There was one, and that one was John: “Then went in also that other disciple, which came first to the sepulchre, and he saw and believed.” Why John? Why did he see the empty tomb and believe? John saw and believed because he conquered his rationalism on the night of the last supper when he laid his head on Christ’s sacred heart. Thomas was not a moral pariah like Judas Iscariot, he loved much; he was willing to die for Christ. But he couldn’t completely believe till he saw the risen Lord. When he did see him in the flesh, he declared, “My Lord, and my God.” He wanted to believe, but he needed help to overcome his rationalism, and our Lord had compassion on him and gave him the help he needed. And then He speaks to us and tells us that we shall be blessed if we believe without having seen what Thomas saw, the risen Lord.

I’m at the age where death is no longer a mere abstraction to me. I’ve seen it close up in the seemingly lifeless faces of loved ones. “Is this the promised end?” My rationalism tells me, ‘yes’ – that horrid monster death is the promised end for all things mortal. I, like Thomas, when the rational mind predominates over my heart, doubt the reality of the risen Lord. I am not John. But I do have that within which is part John; my heart says, “Lord, I believe, help my unbelief.”

In Milton’s Samson Agonistes, Samson, after he has been blinded by the Philistines, is visited by Delilah who offers him her body, telling him that there are still pleasures that a blind man can experience. Samson rejects the offer with a most striking vehemence. And he does so because he knows that the temptation of Delilah is the temptation he is the most susceptible to. All of us, the people of the 20th and 21st centuries, are born into the culture of rationalism. It is in our mother’s milk and the bottled milk we feed upon; it has been woven, under the guise of theology, into our churches, and it has been woven into our culture under the guise of science. We must react with violence, the type of violence that taketh the Kingdom of Heaven by storm, against the culture of rationalism that presses down upon us in church and state.

The Holy Ghost resides in the human heart. He is the comforter that we need if we are to be like John: “He saw and believed.” This is why we cannot, as the modern day conservatives suggest we do, combat the liberals’ rationalism with what we believe to be the correct rationalism. There is no correct rationalism. Christ’s resurrection from the dead is not rational. And we must believe that Christ rose from the dead. If we don’t believe in that stunning, startling, unscientific conquest of dumb nature, there is no use continuing any further with the charade of life. I once saw a modern movie in which the hero tells his pregnant girlfriend to get an abortion, because, “This is a trashcan world.” That cuts through all the liberal rhetoric about the brave new world of love, equality, and freedom – “This is a trashcan world.” If Christ be not risen, we are maggots crawling on a trash heap. The love that once was there in Christian Europe, the Christian Europe that the liberals denounce and the church men tell us never existed, allows us to see the risen Lord. We see Christ without actually touching His side and His hands, because the people who believed without seeing Christ in the flesh did see Him in the love that once was there at their racial and familial hearth fires. Our fight for the European hearth fire is the fight for our Jesus, who tells us that even death, that horror of horrors, will not separate us from those we loved here on earth — in Him and through Him, by the power of the Holy Ghost, who dwells in hearts of flesh.

Robert Frost is often quoted by conservatives because he makes reference to God, but Frost did not take the road less traveled, he took the well-traveled road of a vague, impersonal God, who did not transcend the natural world. That well-traveled road, the road of Greek rationalism, leads us to a world of faithlessness. Christ chose Thomas as one of the twelve, because he had that within, “Let us go and die with him,” which transcended rationalism. He couldn’t quite believe, but he was willing to fight for a man who seemed more than man. He was like unto the followers of Odin: “It might be hopeless, but we will fight to the last man for our Lord and kinsman.” It is that feeling of pietas our Lord builds on. He can enter human hearts, hearts that love, and turn rational minds inward to the Lord of human hearts. When that miracle occurs, the doubting Thomas says, “My Lord and my God.”

Let us never forget that Greek rationalism led the great poet Homer to despair. His vision of the afterlife in The Odyssey is a vision of nothingness. And Sophocles, in Oedipus Rex, tells us that it is better to never have been born. Is that the ‘vision’ we want to build upon? Do I want that vision in my heart when I look at the seemingly lifeless faces of my loved ones who have died in this world? Is that the vision I want in my heart as I face my own death? Please God, send us the Comforter and give us the heart to conquer the rationalism within our own souls and the ever-encircling gloom of rationalism in the hostile liberal world around us.

In the “Grand Inquisitor” chapter of The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoyevsky accurately depicts the false path, the path of rationalism, which the organized Christian churches took into Satan’s dark woods. The human heart seems to be a labyrinth in which a man can get lost. But that labyrinth is the only path to Christ, because the Holy Ghost dwells there. The easy road to God on the rationalist Celestial Railroad is a road that leads to hell. If we constantly stare at dumb nature, we will not see God, we will see a spiritual void which we will try to fill with nature’s gods and nature’s opiates. We must hold out for “all or nothing.” Unamuno went back and forth from faith to doubt because he could never quite conquer his rationalism. We who are about to die cannot be rationalists. For the sake of our souls, for the sake of our loved ones, we must take the path less trodden on, the path of faith in a personal Savior who transcends reason.

In the late 1960s, the liberals made explicit what had been implicit in the European world since World War I ended – Rationalism, with its attendant worship of science and the noble savage was the new religion of the modern Europeans. One of the ugliest manifestations of that new religion was the development of death and dying courses in the universities. In those courses, the liberals taught young men and women that death was not something to be afraid of. Why did we no longer need to fear death? Was it because the old, old story of Jesus and His love was true? Of course not. The liberals told us that we did not have to fear death because human beings were mere creatures of nature. We were not sons and daughters of Christ who were not meant to die – we were just natural entities destined to return to the natural world. The atheism of the gypsy in Walter Scott’s novel, Quentin Durward, became the mainstream faith of the ruling liberal elites in church and state:

“To be resolved into the elements,” said the hardened atheist, pressing his fettered arms against his bosom; “my hope, trust, and expectation is that the mysterious frame of humanity shall melt into the general mass of nature, to be recompounded in the other forms with which she daily supplies those which daily disappear, and return under different forms — the watery particles to streams and showers, the earthy parts to enrich their mother earth, the airy portions to wanton in the breeze, and those of fire to supply the blaze of Aldebaran and his brethren. — In this faith have I lived, and I will die in it! — Hence! begone! — disturb me no farther! — I have spoken the last word that mortal ears shall listen to.”

That new-old faith of the liberals is not my faith, nor can it ever be a genuine faith for a human being. How can we have a faith in nothingness? Dylan Thomas was right to rage against the dying of the light. And he was also right to drink himself into alcoholic oblivion when he could not believe in the light. We dare not look on Dylan Thomas from the Mt. Olympus of rationalism – “It’s a pity that he didn’t rest content with nature and nature’s gods as all rational men do.” No! The pity is that Dylan Thomas gave up on his rage against the dying of the light. He stopped raging and succumbed to the rational world of science and the noble savage. There is a light beyond this rational vale of tears. That light has a local habitation and a name. His home is the human heart, and His name is Jesus. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Faithful hearts, Rationalism | Tagged | Comments Off on Doubt and Faith

The Humanity of God and the Inhumanity of the Liberals

Posted on July 27, 2019 by cwny

Can I then be so cold-hearted,
think that under this same roof
heartless men should play the master,
daily give of evil proof,
and baptize in worldly oceans
human clay to devil’s wiles,
off’ring wine at Jesus’ table
to the god of murderous lies,
who will bless the loss of souls?

-N. F. S. Grundtvig

The devil has chosen to attack Christ through liberalism. “If I can liberalize the European people, I can remove Christ from their hearts, and then I will have triumphed over Christ.” Satan has triumphed over Christ in the cultural wars. His people, not Christ’s people, rule Europe and the world. It is our task, the remnant band, to restore Christ the King to His rightful place. And failing that, it is our task to die faithful, fighting to the last man. Surely we can fight for Christ just as nobly and as fiercely as our ancestors fought for Odin.

It is the noble savage, championed by such ‘lights’ as Rousseau and Addison, that has given liberalism the anti-Savior that was and is necessary to keep Christ away from the European people. Christ is now a king in exile, forsaken by His people, who have tossed Him aside for new kings and new gods.

The ideologies of humanity which always necessitate the destruction of the greater part of white humanity need a Savior diametrically opposed to the Savior once championed by white Europeans. Christianity is the one and only faith that holds to the belief that the living God entered human history. The European people, when they accepted Christ, became a people with a Christian past. The story of Christ’s presence in history became the history of the European people. The new ideologies, the Jacobin and communist ideologies, the ideologies of liberalism, must oppose the white race because the ideologues of liberalism believe in a future kingdom on earth purged of the evil ones, the people who championed an evil religion which poisoned the hearts and minds of the European people and impeded the liberals’ march to the new enlightened world of humanity unchained.

If you demonize the European Christians in the name of a liberal future, be it a Christless future or a future with a purer, more radiant Christ cleansed of His European trappings, you have killed the image of the living God in His people and created a new God, made in the image of Satan. It is now a given amongst the liberals who rule the European nations that whites must be replaced by the people of color, because the people of color are noble and pure while the whites are evil and impure. And it is now a given in Christian circles that Christianity and white pietas, which the ‘Christians’ call racism, are incompatible. So the people who constituted the heart of the Christian church, the antique Europeans, are shoved aside as bad Christians. But who then are the ‘good’ Christians? Francis the Blasphemer? The new age advocates of Christian Judaism? Or is it the theological Christians who bid us look to their systems, which rent asunder our heart to heart connection to the living God so that we could know Him better through their enlightened minds?

In modern Europe, even in conservative circles, it is forbidden to link Christianity to Europe. That is racist. It is racist because… Why is it racist to state the truth? The liberals never tell us why. They don’t have to give a reason for their liberalism because they are in power. Jefferson Davis wanted, after the war, to have his day in court, because he thought he would win in court. But the liberals were not about to give up a victory won on the battlefield in a court of justice. So it is with the modern liberals. They have won the cultural war, they don’t have to explain why every white man who opposes any aspect of liberalism is damned as a racist. It is simply a given, a sacred given more mathematically certain, in the liberals’ minds, than the givens in geometry.

What are we to make of the Christians who inhabit the buildings called churches? Why do they foam at the mouth like vicious attack dogs every time Europe and Christ are linked together? Is it because they have reached a higher, more purified state of being, have they ascended to heaven while still on earth? That is what they believe. But the truth of the matter is not what the purified Christians tell us it is. The modern purified Christians want all the benefits of a Christian culture without the sacrifices that are necessary to maintain a Christian culture. You cannot have liberalism and Christ. The modern anti-European Christians claim they reject European Christianity because the antique Europeans were racist. Were they racist because they loved their own people? Yes, the modern European Christians tell us, it is racist to love your own people — that is the meaning of the parable of the Good Samaritan. But is that the meaning of the parable? No, of course not. The post-Christian liberals, such as Francis the Blasphemer, interpret the Good Samaritan parable in the light of liberal ideology because they want the liberals to love them. The Good Samaritan does not invite the stranger on the road into his own house, he takes care of him on the road and leaves him at an inn. Nor does he seek out the muggers in order to invite them into his home so that he can worship them as they rob, rape, and murder his family members. But of course the professed Christians are not interested in Christ’s truth. They want the love of the world, and the powers that be in the liberal world hate Christ and his people. The anti-Christian churchmen are the Amen chorus for the liberals. The liberals scream, ‘racist’ at the antique Europeans, and the churchmen scream, ‘Amen.’

If the members of the liberals’ Amen chorus were really Christian they would support the people who made the Incarnate Word part of their culture. Did the people of color ever know mercy or love before they were exposed to European culture? No, they did not. Yet in the name of their alleged love for the colored heathen, the Amen chorus wants to join with the liberals in order to eradicate the culture of the antique Europeans and destroy any and all whites who are still determined to stand by that cultural heritage. The Amen-ers and the liberals are constantly attacking the ‘haters’, which translates to people who hate the rule of Satan, who was, is, and ever shall be, the great hater. Liberalism is a religion of hate dedicated to the destruction of all things ‘great and beautiful’ that came from the antique Europeans’ covenant with the God of love. There is no love in Liberaldom, there is only hatred for Christ and His people. Feminism, gay pride, negro worship, and so many other perversions have become sacred rights in Liberaldom, so again, I ask, do the rulers of such a world and their Amen chorus of ‘Christians’ have a right to condemn the antique Europeans for their alleged ‘racism’? No, they do not have that right. Their heaven on earth is hell, and they are the hounds of hell, because they have denied their humanity and that denial makes them worse than beasts, it makes them devils.

Devils both then and also now,
when face to face with Jesus,
say, ‘Yes, we know you are God’s Son,
O, please do not destroy us!’
But what they know they cannot trust,
and with the Prince of Darkness must
dwell, for he is their Father!

Human comes first and Christian next;
on this truth they, misguided,
both beasts and devils long baptized,
themselves on Moors they prided,
they called them ‘wise,’ though lost to Christ,
and, while they mere right answers prized,
left heathens to damnation!

N. F. S. Grundtvig

The antique Europeans did not leave heathens to damnation because they loved their own people at their racial hearth fire, and the warmth of that European hearth fire extended to the hearth fires of the colored races. Without white pietas, there is only damnation for the whites and the people of color. Walt Disney’s granddaughter recently condemned her grandfather as a racist. It is precisely that type of cowardly impiety, the hatred for white pietas, that has made white people and their new colored gods into the slaves of Satan. Those who truly love will endure to the end. We must counter the liberals’ hatred of the white race with our love of our people in and through the Savior. If we cling to our humanity, the humanity revealed to us by the God who took on human flesh and dwelt among us, we will not go over the cliff with the demon-possessed liberals, nor will we be overwhelmed by the barbarians of color.

It is not possible to prove to the liberals or their Amen chorus of purified Christians that you are not racist, because they are not concerned with the truth. They use the term ‘racist’ as an enemy pilot uses a bomb. The bomb is dropped because war has commenced after all diplomatic options have been exhausted. Trotsky coined the term ‘racist’ to deal with his enemies, the white Christians, he did not coin the term as a means of aiding colored heathens or making peace with whites. When whites stop condemning white pietas, when they stop desecrating their white progenitors, then, and only then, will they be on the road to recovery. Recovery from what? Recovery from the sickness unto death, the denial of their humanity and the denial of His divine humanity.

Samuel Johnson’s dictum that a man who is not a liberal when he is young has no heart, and a man who is not a conservative when he is old has no head, is false. The mark of a Burkean conservative, who is the only true conservative, is that he has a heart. He does not permit the murder of his people for the sake of an abstract concept of humanity. It was Burke the conservative who cared about the victims of Robespierre’s purges to cleanse the French Republic by killing everyone connected to Christian Europe. It is always the heartless creatures of liberalism, who love their mind-forged systems and hate humanity, who murder millions in the name of humanity.

The followers of Odin bent their knees to Christ because they saw, with the eyes of the heart, that the humanity of Odin was their link to the God who was greater than Odin, not because He was smarter than Odin, but because His heart was greater than even Odin’s great heart. We are the people who love Christ because of His divinely human heart. We will fight to the last man for our racial hearth fire because He dwells there with our people. We must be what the liberals call racist, because we must love the human first, before we can know and love the living God, whose divine humanity sustains us in this world and the next. +

Posted in Europeans and Christ, Religion of Satan | Tagged | Comments Off on The Humanity of God and the Inhumanity of the Liberals

Unstudied from the Heart

Posted on July 20, 2019 by cwny

Now as he was speaking with me, I was in a deep sleep on my face toward the ground: but he touched me, and set me upright. And he said, Behold, I will make thee know what shall be in the last end of the indignation: for at the time appointed the end shall be. – Daniel 8: 18-19

Some dwell in deserts; seek and inhabit of their own accord homes in dark places; they wait for the heavenly home. Often he who grudges them life brings hateful fear upon them, shows them terror, at times empty splendor; he, the crafty slayer, has power over both; he persecutes lone-dwellers. Angels stand before them ready with the weapons of the spirit; they forget not to give aid; they protect the lives of holy men; they know their gladness is with God. These are the tried warriors who serve the King who never withholds the reward from them who are faithful in love. –Guthlac

In his short story “Earth’s Holocaust,” Nathaniel Hawthorne depicts a community of Europeans – “but whether in the time past or time to come is a matter of little or no moment” – who decide that they want to rid themselves of all the “worn-out trumpery” of the past in order to build a more perfect world. In order to accomplish their “noble” end, they build a huge bonfire and start heaping the family crests, the military decorations, the great literary works, and everything else connected to old Europe into the bonfire. And finally they cast the Bible into the fire:

In the general destruction of books already described, a holy volume, that stood apart from the catalogue of human literature, and yet, in one sense, was at its head, had been spared. But the Titan of innovation,—angel or fiend, double in his nature, and capable of deeds befitting both characters,—at first shaking down only the old and rotten shapes of things, had now, as it appeared, laid his terrible hand upon the main pillars which supported the whole edifice of our moral and spiritual state. The inhabitants of the earth had grown too enlightened to define their faith within a form of words, or to limit the spiritual by any analogy to our material existence. Truths which the heavens trembled at were now but a fable of the world’s infancy. Therefore, as the final sacrifice of human error, what else remained to be thrown upon the embers of that awful pile, except the book which, though a celestial revelation to past ages, was but a voice from a lower sphere as regarded the present race of man? It was done! Upon the blazing heap of falsehood and worn-out truth—things that the earth had never needed, or had ceased to need, or had grown childishly weary of—fell the ponderous church Bible, the great old volume that had lain so long on the cushion of the pulpit, and whence the pastor’s solemn voice had given holy utterance on so many a Sabbath day. There, likewise, fell the family Bible, which the long-buried patriarch had read to his children,—in prosperity or sorrow, by the fireside and in the summer shade of trees,—and had bequeathed downward as the heirloom of generations. There fell the bosom Bible, the little volume that had been the soul’s friend of some sorely tried child of dust, who thence took courage, whether his trial were for life or death, steadfastly confronting both in the strong assurance of immortality.

All these were flung into the fierce and riotous blaze; and then a mighty wind came roaring across the plain with a desolate howl, as if it were the angry lamentation of the earth for the loss of heaven’s sunshine; and it shook the gigantic pyramid of flame and scattered the cinders of half-consumed abominations around upon the spectators. – “Earth’s Holocaust”

The modern, scientized Europeans, clerical and lay, will respond to Hawthorne’s parable with ridicule: “We still have Bibles, we still have our faith — we have just progressed to a purer Christianity.” But we few who still see life as a parable can see that Hawthorne was describing liberalism. He saw the end result of the liberals’ progression to a ‘higher’ stage of existence: it leads to the dethronement of Christ the King and the enthronement of Satan. Our present anti-civilization is the embodiment of a “desolate howl.”

The fundamentalists, if there are any left, were and are right to oppose the liberals’ assertion that, “Man is a monkey, therefore we must all love one another.” But the liberals’ doctrine of progress entails so much more than Darwinian evolution. The same evangelicals who oppose evolution have accepted the liberals’ progressive view of democracy as part of mankind’s march to the light. And they have grafted the nation state of Israel onto their new and improved version of Christianity. So even the avowed “Biblical” Christians have decided to be very unbiblical in the face of liberal progress. And I need not mention the Catholic churchmen who wallow in the slough of liberalism like pigs in slop.

The modern European must be a repentant Samson in terms of his spiritual strength. He has the accumulated weight of over a century of liberal progress on his shoulders, which he must throw off and stand before the liberal world ready to do battle with the Philistines of liberalism. He must leave behind the cult of, “I am not a racist, please love me.” No matter how obsequious, no matter how subservient the white cultist is, the liberals and the colored barbarians will not love him. They haven’t the heart for love, because they have forsaken the God of love. If you join the liberals in their ‘progression’ toward the light of science, democracy, and the new and purer Christianity, you will join them in the darkness of the kingdom of eternal night where Satan dwells, prowling about the world seeking the ruin of souls.

If we don’t consciously reject the liberals’ progressive view of history, we will be swept along with the liberals into hell. The liberal is neither Greek nor Christian; he rejects the cyclic history of the pagan Greeks as well as the Christian eschatology. The liberals’ doctrine of progress is, like every aspect of liberalism, a perversion of Christianity. The antique Christian believed that God entered human history at one particular date in history, and he believed that God would once again enter human history at the end of time. He did not believe, as the liberal believes, that mankind was evolving toward moral perfection, a moral perfection that would lead to the kingdom of God on earth. The hatred of all things white is connected with the two conflicting views of history, the Christian view and the liberal view. You cannot, as the 20th century and 21st century ‘Christians’ tried to do, and are still trying to do, blend the Christian view of history with the liberals’ view; you cannot progress toward Babylon and still hold on to your Christian faith. In order to live and thrive in our modern Babylon you must either completely renounce Christ, as the liberals have done, or you must reject the Christ of old Europe, claiming He was a false Aslan, and graft Christ onto the nation state of Israel, Islam, and the sacred Negro. If ‘racism’ becomes the unpardonable sin, which it has become in all Christian circles, then the modern Christian who wants to move with the liberal times can feel justified in rejecting the racist antique Europeans and their antiquated Christ, in order to embrace the new blended Christianity that our Lord condemns in the book of Revelation.

C. S. Lewis was groping toward the light when he wrote Pilgrim’s Regress. He realized that any man or woman born in the 20th century had to return to the faith of the European people prior to the 20th century, the century in which science triumphed over Christ. We can all, if we look at our racial history, see Satan’s myth of man’s progression toward moral perfection on this earth. Let me tell a tale of two grandmothers, my grandmothers. My paternal grandmother was a first generation American of Welsh descent. Her father started working in the mines at age 8 as a breaker boy and worked as a coal miner until his death at age 60. Her mother died before her father, and she, at age 14, became the woman of the house until she married at age 18. Her formative years were between 1900 and 1914, the years before World War I, which were culturally part of the 19th century. She never left that cultural milieu. When her church started preaching something different from what she had heard in her childhood, she stopped going to church. And she never — and this is essential — respected academia. Was her distrust of academia blind ignorance or was it a deeply ingrained prejudice against an alien ideology that attacked the hearth fire from which she derived her spiritual sustenance? I would say it was the latter. My grandmother had wise blood; she clung to her little Welsh hearth fire her entire life. I loved her then and now.

All that we know of faith and His divine charity we know because of the faith and love of men and women like my grandmother, who stood by the faith bequeathed to them at their racial and familial hearth fire, which was and is the faith of old Europe. My father went to college on the G.I. Bill, and the education he received separated him from his mother’s faith, but there was something vital he retained from his mother who refused to progress: “Whenever you pray, always pray in Jesus’s name.” That, more than anything else he ever learned in academic or in the modern churches, sustained my father in the hour of his death. One thinks of the words penned by Charles Mackay:

A nameless man, amid the crowd
That thronged the daily mart,
Let fall a word of hope and love,
Unstudied from the heart,
A whisper on the tumult thrown,
A transitory breath,
It raised a brother from the dust,
It saved a soul from death.
O germ! O fount! O word of love!
O thought at random cast!
Ye were but little at the first,
But mighty at the last.

The love that was “unstudied from the heart,” which came from our born of woman Savior, was the love bequeathed to our people in the days before the European people became too intelligent for the unstudied love from the heart. Everything must now be studied or it is not real. But that is contrary to reality. Traditionalist movements based on an intellectual adherence to abstract systems are not the type of tradition we need. We need a heartfelt faith, we need our Jesus, who lived in the hearts of the antique Europeans and will come to the hearts of the men and women who ‘regress’ to old Europe.

I won’t dwell on my other grandmother. She went the way of church and state, the way of the intelligent people. As the church shifted, so did her faith. She lacked something in her soul, the spiritual backbone to resist the intelligence gambit of the liberals. The way of the third dumb brother, who embraced the foolishness of God, not the modern way, was not the intelligent way, and my maternal grandmother, like so many de-souled Europeans, succumbed to the fear of being insufficiently progressive.

We of the second, third, and fourth generations removed from the turn of the 19th century cannot simply remain faithful to the faith we received. We must regress; we must place ourselves firmly in old Europe and remain rooted at the hearth fires of our honored dead, the Europeans who loved Christ, “unstudied from the heart.” A love that can be put under a microscope and examined is not love. The modern propensity to study God’s love until it has become a non-love, and the modern propensity to study human love until it becomes mere biology, is a spiritual sickness. The scientizing of God and man always results in the disappearance of God from human hearts and the dissolution of the human personality.

The liberals know Jesus Christ as the demons knew Christ: “Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth? Art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art; the Holy One of God.” What is lacking in the demons’ knowledge of Jesus Christ is what is lacking in the liberals’ knowledge of Jesus Christ. Both sets of demons lack hearts of flesh, because they desire, then and now, the power of the illuminated knowledge of the natural world, rather than intimacy with the living God who imparts, through His connection to hearts of flesh, a knowledge greater than intellectual knowledge. Having rejected that greater knowledge, the liberals must cast everything white and Christian into Hawthorne’s bonfire. And the intellectual Christians must join the liberals, they too must scream, “Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth?” If they don’t side with the liberals, they, who are like unto Caiaphas and Dostoyevsky’s Grand Inquisitor, will be forced to give up their power, the power that comes with being the ‘God dispensers,’ the intelligent Illuminati who keep God enclosed in their golden box of knowledge. Hence the liberals and the Christian Illuminati are bound in wedlock, through the power of the abstract intellect, to science and the noble savage, and against the people that were connected to God, not through their enlightened intellects, but through their heartfelt love for the Savior who did not despise the Virgin’s womb.

The bonfire of liberalism is still burning. The liberals have thrown everything directly connected to Christian Europe into the bonfire. Now they are proceeding to throw everything even tangentially connected to Christian Europe into the fire. The more conservative, democracy-loving liberals, whose hearts belong to the new order, men such as Geert Wilders and Donald Trump, are being thrown on the bonfire as well, because the liberals must destroy every semblance of a link between modern Europe and Christian Europe.

We must regress. The maxim, “You can’t go back in time,” is a maxim of liberalism. It refers to the material realm: it means that our scientific progress is the same as our moral progress. That is a lie. Morally we have ‘progressed’ beyond the morally depraved anti-civilizations of Babylon, Sodom, and Gomorrah. We must go back to incarnate Europe, the Europe that honored the Word made flesh.

I see no signs of any moral awakening of the European people. The love that once was there is gone. Is it really possible that the European people prefer the Babylonian night over the light of Christian Europe? Is the fear of that word ‘racist’ so great that it can separate us from the love of our own people and the love of our divine Savior? We need the strength of the repentant Samson and the faith of Daniel. Let us pray for that strength and that faith. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Fear of racist label, Religion of Satan | Tagged , | Comments Off on Unstudied from the Heart

The Image of the Beast Shall Die

Posted on July 13, 2019 by cwny

His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude. And I Daniel alone saw the vision: for the men that were with me saw not the vision; but a great quaking fell upon them, so that they fled to hide themselves. – Daniel 10: 6-7

And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters. And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp two edged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength. And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last: I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; – Revelation 1: 15-18

And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. – Revelation 20: 12

The 4th of July celebrations in America always resemble a macabre dance of death, but they appeared particularly ghastly this year in lieu of the fact that the whites in America are facing a mass invasion of Africans (who are being flown in), Mexicans, and Moslems at our southern border that makes the Moslem invasion of the European countries seem small in comparison. Every time a new influx of barbarians violates the British nation, there is a segment of American ‘tough guys’ who gloat over the Brit’s failure to protect their nation. “That can’t happen here,” the tough guys jeer, “because we have our guns.” Well, it seems something greater than guns is necessary to stop the invasion of the barbarian hordes. Without the will to fight, mere guns are worthless. And without pietas – ‘I will defend my own’ – white people will be and are defenseless against an invading army that is aided and abetted by the liberal rulers of our nation.

I am glad I still can purchase a gun without going on the black market. If a white burglar tries to violate my home, I might be allowed to shoot him in self-defense, but all the guns in the world, owned by white grazers who do not believe that whites have a racial hearth fire or a God of their ascending race, will be useless against an invading army that will not be deterred by abstractions such as ‘democracy’ and ‘peaceful co-existence.’ Broomsticks and garden hoes in the hands of a people with pietas are more effective weapons of self-defense than guns in the hands of people who believe in democracy and the rights of man. We are facing a crisis of biblical proportions that can only be dealt with by a people who believe God still speaks to them through His word.

There is no dichotomy between the Old Testament and the New Testament. Christ speaks to us through His prophets in the Old Testament, and He speaks to us directly in the New Testament. The divine charity is always there for those who seek God in their heart. Throughout the Old Testament we see the same depressing pattern: the people fall away from God, and they are brought down by the barbarian hordes – the Egyptians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Persians, etc. There are brief restorations under good kings who listen to the prophets, kings such as Hezekiah, and his great grandson, Josiah, but the bad kings outnumber the good kings and eventually the people of Judah become a captive people. I am not suggesting that the captivity of the European people is exactly the same as the captivity of the Jews during the Babylonian captivity, but I do think there are spiritual parallels between the two captivities that we should not ignore.

The prophets brought the word of God to the people. They enjoined God’s people to take His word into their hearts. When the people’s hearts were hardened against His word, when they returned to Baal, they became the slaves of the heathens. The European people took Christ into their hearts and championed Him against heathendom. They fell away from Christ every time the churchmen managed to convince them that the minds of the theologians were greater than the heart of God. The constant battle between the intellects of men and the heart of God finally ended with the victory of the men of intellect. The 20th century marked the beginning of the Babylonian captivity of the European people. But that is where the spiritual parallel ends. The European people, unlike the Jews of the diaspora, did not and do not acknowledge their captivity. They continue to worship Baal through science, democracy, and the ‘noble savage.’ And the liberal rulers of the European people were not, and are not, as humane as tyrants such as Nebuchadnezzar and Darius. There is no foe deadlier than the post-Christian liberal, because the post-Christian liberal has all the zeal of a Christian European, but it is now a zeal for everything satanic, everything opposed to Christ’s reign of charity.

Tommy Robinson is going back to jail for opposing Islamic rapists, Jared Taylor was banned from Poland and the rest of the European nations for speaking of white solidarity, and whites throughout the European world are being denied the right to even speak of white people as a distinct race of people worthy of surviving as a people. All this has come about because white people have returned, through science and democracy, to the worship of Baal. The Jared Taylors of neo-paganism offer us no solution to white genocide, because they enjoin us, from within the cult of science and democracy, which is the worship of Baal, to oppose white genocide with the same democratic and scientific anti-vision of existence that has brought on white genocide. The Jared Taylors of Europe want to avoid Jesus Christ without going over the cliff with the swine. But that is not possible – you must stand with Christ or go over the cliff with the swine.

Trump cannot do what is necessary to stop the barbarian invasion of his nation, because he lacks an integral faith. He has built one altar to Jesus Christ and another altar to science and democracy. That is not sufficient. The devil will not share his throne with Jesus Christ. Trump was elected under the mantle of Satan – he cannot move against Satan and his people from within the bowels of Satandom. We need leaders who are not bound by the rules of science and democracy, we need leaders who seek the living God in their hearts and then act on the faith that is in their hearts. Would Alfred permit the barbarian hordes to invade his nation? No, he would not. But Alfred did not believe in the worship of Baal. He believed, as the prophets believed, in the living God.

God did not grant eternal life on this earth nor did He grant success in every battle to the kings who followed His will. But He did, and He will, sustain His people when they follow His will. They will not be overwhelmed by the heathens as a people, nor will they die alone and in despair as individuals. That is God’s promise to His people, and He has kept that promise. Instead of trying to organize democratic pep rallies for whites, white leaders should be enjoining their people to return to God. But of course our “leaders” do not believe that Christ is the living God. They believe in two-thirds of the liberals’ trinity — they believe in the abstract intellect of man, which is the father, and they believe in science, which is the Holy Ghost. They do not believe in the liberals’ savior, which is the noble black savage. Their unbelief infuriates the liberals, but it can’t really hurt them because two-thirds of a faith is not a fighting faith. When the Jared Taylors of Satandom are rebuked by their fellow liberals for their unbelief in the noble savage, they take their case to the first person of the Trinity, the abstract intellect. And much to their surprise, they always lose in that court. Why are they surprised? Don’t they see the image of the noble savage emblazoned on the courtroom door when they enter that tribunal? The verdict of the liberal court has been predetermined: the white man is always guilty as charged.

Neo-pagans, such as Arthur Kemp, tell us that the whites in South Africa and the British in India were overwhelmed by demographics. The Europeans came to those nations and through the practice of Christian charity they decreased the death rates and increased the birth rates of the indigenous colored populations. As a consequence the whites in those hostile lands were outnumbered and defeated. But wait a minute! Does it make that much difference whether whites are outnumbered 100,000 to 1 or 200,000 to 1? I would suggest that the whites in India and in South Africa were not defeated by demographics, they were defeated by their own liberalism. They lost the will to fight because they lost their faith in the God who defends His people against the heathens’ arrows that flieth by day and the liberals’ pestilence that walketh in darkness. The only demographics that matter are the demographics of faith. When whites cease to believe in the living God, when the vast majority of whites worship Baal, they will be defeated by the colored heathens even if they outnumber the colored heathens. Nationalist leaders who bid us look to democracy, science, and improved breeding through animal husbandry in order to combat white genocide are not white leaders. They want liberalism without the plunge over the cliff with the swine. But that is always where those who reject Christ end up – they go off the cliff with the swine.

The 20th century was a century of transition for the European people. They progressed from an ‘image of God’ culture to an ‘image of the beast in man’ culture. The liberals held the reins of power and they used that power to attack God through His people.

The rebels to God perfectly abhor the Author of their being. They hate him “with all their heart, with all their mind, with all their soul, and with all their strength.” He never presents himself to their thoughts but to menace and alarm them. They cannot strike the Sun out of Heaven, but they are able to raise a smouldering smoke that obscures him from their own eyes. Not being able to revenge themselves on God, they have a delight in vicariously defacing, degrading, torturing, and tearing in pieces his image in man. – Letters on a Regicide Peace

Look at our art in the 20th century. Does it make us feel connected to a God above nature? Do we see the image of God in man? No, we see the image of the beast in man. And that new image, the image of the beast in man, became codified and written into law in the 21st century. Feminism, negro worship, gay pride and every other perversion have become virtues in the ‘beast in man’ culture of the 21st century. How can men and women who accept the ‘beast in man’ culture of modernity resist the arrows of the colored barbarians and the pestilence of liberalism? They can’t and they won’t, because mere beasts who worship the man-gods of nature, the noble colored savages, do not have any love for their own people. They only live through the man-gods of nature.

God and God alone will judge the intentions of the European missionaries who tried to convert the colored heathens, but whatever their intentions were the end result was that the European missionaries turned away from their own culture, the ‘image of God in man’ culture, in order to embrace the ‘beast in man’ culture of the colored heathens. And with a missionary zeal the churchmen preached their new gospel, which is an anti-gospel, the gospel of Satan, to the European people. Every ‘charitable’ outreach in church and state is now directed toward the aid of the colored heathen. But is that aid given as alms to the needy should be given, in the spirit of Christian charity? No, it is not. The ‘aid’ to the colored heathen is given as tribute to the man-gods of the new gospel of the anti-Christ, the gospel of the ‘beast in man.’

There are always a few intellectuals who can live with two-thirds of the new trinity, the abstracted intellect and science. But the bulk of mankind, particularly European mankind, need a Savior. If they cannot believe in Jesus Christ as their Savior, they will turn to the noble savages of color. How then can the European grazers oppose the barbarian invasion? They can’t kill their gods, so they must plead with their gods to be merciful. But there is only mercy in the living God, the God of the prophets, the God of Daniel, the God of St. Paul, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, who is the beginning and the end. The European who does not forsake his people, the European who refuses to worship the ‘beast in man,’ is the only force on earth that can resist the barbarian invasion of his nation, whether that nation is in Europe or North America. Such a European has that within, the grace of God, which enables him to stand against a multitude of colored heathens and liberals. If God’s image in man perishes there will be no mercy on the face of the earth, but the liberals’ victory need not be the final victory. If we search our hearts for the living God, we can prevail over the liberals and the colored barbarians. It has been done before. It only seems like the liberals have won because the Europeans have lost their vision of the God-Man and replaced that vision with the man-gods of color. “I know not seems.” +

Posted in Christ the Hero, Democracy, Religion of Satan | Tagged | Comments Off on The Image of the Beast Shall Die

Surviving the Tempest of Liberalism

Posted on July 6, 2019 by cwny

The day goes by like a shadow o’er the heart. – Stephen Collins Foster

In France they have their Bastille Day, and in America we have our 4th of July. In both cases the celebrations are grounded in the satanic principles of “liberty, equality, fraternity.” Liberty from what? From all restraints placed upon us by the living God. Equality? Yes, an equality for the people, but “the people” as defined by the Illuminati. And who is our fraternal brother? It is Satan.

America was the first breakaway nation, the first nation of Europeans who broke away from the European commonwealth of Christian nations in order to “form a more perfect union.” France and the rest of the European nations soon followed in America’s unholy train. The Southern people’s revolt in the 1860s was the revolt of a Christian people trying to hold onto their filial relationship to God and their familial relationship to their kith and kin against the dictates of a governing body that demanded a universality based on the worship of Baal. The weakness of the Southern revolt was that it was grounded in the assumption that “the Constitution has been sabotaged,” rather than, “the Constitution was penned in hell.” Let us now proceed, in this the 21st century, the century that should use the phrase “In the year of Satan”, under the correct assumption that the document penned in hell and the principles emitting from that document must be opposed by Christian Europeans.

We must see that the destruction of the white race has been codified into law in the European nations. All the utopian nations of Europe are conceived in liberty from God and dedicated to the proposition that the white race and the Christ of old Europe are evil. And conversely, all non-whites and all non-Christian religions are good and pure. The liberals fight to make sure that their satanic republic “shall long endure.”

You can’t stop the great liberal purge of the Christ-bearing race by begging the liberals to go back to a less virulent form of the democratic cancer. Once the cancer has spread, you can only fight it and kill it; you can’t go back to its first stage. The Trump presidency is a perfect example of the futility of trying to go back to a higher position on the slippery slope that leads to hell. Under Trump’s presidency, the Mexican invasion of the United States has not been stopped, but that is not Trump’s fault. He has done more than any other president tried to do or ever will do to stop the Mexican invasion of the United States. His efforts have failed miserably because you can’t stop an invasion sanctioned by a liberal elite that hates all things white and Christian by invoking the principles of that same white-hating, Christ-hating elite.  Flesh and blood people are invading the United States, just as flesh and blood people are invading the European nations. The invasions cannot be stopped by an appeal to an abstract belief in the democratic way. The democratic way is a tool of the devil, a tool the liberal elite uses to destroy whiteness. Could Ganelon have been expected to save the Christians whom he plotted to destroy? Trump cannot fire upon the invaders because his own party and the Democratic Party would have him removed from office. And the harpies of the so-called conservative right, such as Ann Coulter, who have been screaming at Trump to do something about the invasion, would join in the chorus of people demanding his removal from office if he actually used violence to stop the invasion. Only a people who believe they are a people with a homeland will defend their people and their homeland.

White people do not believe they are a people, nor do they believe that they have a racial home. Africa for blacks, Europe for blacks and Moslems, and the United States for blacks, Moslems, and Mexicans. But Europe for whites? Or the United States for whites? That is racist. The Pope’s heart bleeds for the Mexican “refugees” who drowned, but does his heart bleed for whites in South Africa and the European nations who have been murdered and dispossessed by the black Africans, the Mexicans, and the Moslems? No, his heart does not bleed for those white victims, because the Pope’s heart belongs to the great hater of the white race, his fraternal brother, Lucifer.

Nothing good in America came from our Constitution, which was written by Enlightenment agnostics who held Christ in contempt. What was good in America stemmed from the customs and manners that were born and nurtured in Christian Europe. Those customs and manners could not stand up against the liberal Illuminati once the foundation of those customs and manners, which was and is faith in Christ as true God and true Man, was rent asunder. The much vaunted light of American liberty and justice was not a light, it was the beginning of a new European era, the era of the European people’s descent into the darkness of liberalism, which constitutes, then and now, the enthronement of Satan in the nations that once recognized Christ as their King.

Our home must be more than the place where we live. It must be sacred ground because those whom we love most and those who love us dwell there in communion with the living God. “What God has joined together let no man rent asunder.” We have allowed the liberals and their confederates in organized Christian Jewry to rent asunder the sacred bonds that bind us to our kith and kin and our God. The day of Christian Europe has become the night of Liberalism.

Stephen Foster, the great Northern apologist for the Southern people, put it quite well: “The day goes by like a shadow o’er the heart…” We can’t ever be a people again, we can’t return home, unless we love our people in and through Christ. Like “God’s spies” we can make that observation, but we can’t will “the love that once was there.” We can’t become Christians for the pragmatic purpose of restoring our people. We must actually believe, as our people once believed, in the suffering Servant. Then we will feel as they felt about their people and their homeland. When I was a schoolboy, I memorized the poem, “Marco Bozzaris” by Fitz-Green Halleck (1790-1867). The poem tells the story of Bozzaris’s heroic resistance to the Turkish invaders of his homeland.

An hour passed on–the Turk awoke;
That bright dream was his last;
He woke–to hear his sentries shriek,
“To arms! they come! the Greek! the Greek!”
He woke–to die midst flame, and smoke,
And shout, and groan, and sabre-stroke,
And death-shots falling thick and fast
As lightnings from the mountain-cloud;
And heard, with voice as trumpet loud,
Bozzaris cheer his band:
“Strike–till the last armed foe expires;
Strike–for your altars and your fires;
Strike–for the green graves of your sires;
God–and your native land!”

They fought–like brave men, long and well;
They piled that ground with Moslem slain,
They conquered–but Bozzaris fell,
Bleeding at every vein.
His few surviving comrades saw
His smile when rang their proud hurrah,
And the red field was won;
Then saw in death his eyelids close
Calmly, as to a night’s repose,
Like flowers at set of sun.

Such story poems used to be the birthright of every European. I still remember how my heart stirred within me when I recited the lines, “Strike–till the last armed foe expires; Strike–for your altars and your fires; Strike–for the green graves of your sires; God–and your native land!” All that schoolboy stuff is now considered racist and unchristian. But we must assert, against the liberals and the churchmen, that pietas is not racist. Why did our sovereign Lord take flesh and dwell among us if He thought that our human ties of affection and love were not our connections to the living God? The attack on those human ties is an attack on our God. Who shall separate us from the love of Jesus Christ? The liberals and the churchmen tell us they shall separate us from the love of Jesus Christ by separating us from our people. As for me and my house, we shall serve the Lord, by loving our people in and through the incarnate Lord.

A friend recently told me of a television show on the History Channel called Ancient Aliens, which claims to tell ‘true’ stories of aliens from other planets who have visited earth and founded civilizations here. Only a scientific minded people, who are the most credulous of all people, could believe such rot. The Christ story, which begins with the creation of the world in seven days and proceeds through the temptation in the Garden of Eden, the Great Flood, the Incarnation and then the Crucifixion and Resurrection of our Savior is deemed too fantastical to believe, yet scientific ‘histories’ of aliens are presented as fact to the credulous, superstitious moderns. The foolishness of God is difficult to believe in, but His foolishness strikes a chord in our heart that helps us surmount our unbelief. Do the gods of the science-minded liberals – the negroes, the aliens from other planets, or the bushmen from the Amazon jungle — strike a chord in our heart? When will the European people return home? They will return home when they use the visionary organ of sight, the human heart, instead of their logical, credulous brains, which see only what appears on the surface of life but fail to see what dwells below the surface in the depths of the human heart.

Faith binds us to God and our people; it is the reason we fight in defense of hearth and nation. A people devoid of faith will not fight. The European people no longer believe in the same God their ancestors believed in, and as a consequence they are being overrun by barbarian hordes who do have faith; they believe in their heathen gods while the Europeans do not believe in Christ. I do not see any future for the European people except a future of slavery and extinction. Unless? There is only one ‘unless,’ the same ‘unless’ that has always been our only hope. Christ promised us He would be with us always. I do not see how we can progress beyond our faith in His promise. Why is the worship of Baal, under the mantle of science and the noble savage, a progression from darkness to light? If we ignore the experts who tell us there never was a Christian Europe, we will discover, in our past, a people who loved much. Through those people and their God we will come to see life “feelingly,” again, and we will prevail against the wickedness and snares of the devil and his liberal minions.

Human beings, despite what the Christian Gnostics and the liberals tell us, are the only medium for God’s revelation. He comes to human hearts, not to Platonic minds. His word planted in human hearts is the true light of the world. The liberals’ attack on our racial hearth fire is Satan’s attack on the Word made flesh. If we resist that assault, if we strike for our altars and our hearth fires, we will stand with the Lord God who did not disdain to take on human flesh. “Shall I bring to the birth, and not cause to bring forth? saith the Lord: shall I cause to bring forth, and shut the womb? saith thy God. Rejoice ye with Jerusalem, and be glad with her, all ye that love her: rejoice for joy with her, all ye that mourn for her: That ye may suck, and be satisfied with the breasts of her consolations; that ye may milk out, and be delighted with the abundance of her glory. For thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will extend peace to her like a river, and the glory of the Gentiles like a flowing stream: then shall ye suck, ye shall be borne upon her sides, and be dandled upon her knees. As one whom his mother comforteth, so will I comfort you; and ye shall be comforted in Jerusalem. And when ye see this, your heart shall rejoice, and your bones shall flourish like an herb: and the hand of the Lord shall be known toward his servants, and his indignation toward his enemies.:” – Isaiah 66: 9-14 +

Posted in Democracy, Faithful hearts, Homeland, Religion of Satan | Comments Off on Surviving the Tempest of Liberalism

The Great Liberal Tribunal

Posted on June 29, 2019 by cwny

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. – John 1:1

The liberals demonize Christian Europe, and the intellectual Christians say there never was a Christian Europe. But despite the liberals’ demonization and the intellectual Christians’ denial, I maintain that the antique Europeans, those men and women who predated the 20th century, were the “good ground” that “did yield fruit that sprang up and increased; and brought forth, some thirty, and some sixty, and some an hundred.” The colored barbarians, the liberals, and the intellectual Christians constitute the three different kinds of ground upon which the “good seed” could not grow. First there are the people who, having heard the word, allowed Satan to “taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.” Then there are the people who were the stony ground; they at first received the word “with gladness,” but they “have no root in themselves, and so endure but for a time: afterword, when affliction or persecution ariseth for the word’s sake, immediately they are offended.” And the third group are those who receive the word “sown among thorns; such as hear the word, And the cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts of other things entering in, choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful.”

What all three groups of people have in common is that they lack the “good ground” – they lack hearts of flesh receptive to the Word made flesh. Is it possible for a people whose ancestors were once the “good ground” to become once again the “good ground” upon which our Lord built His church? That is the question for the Hamlets of Europe.

Let me refer to a piece of folklore. A cosmopolitan was lost in the backwoods of Maine (it could be any backwoods you choose). He pulls up to an old farmhouse, knocks at the door, and asks the farmer who opens it, “How do I get to Bangor from here?” The farmer replies, “If I was going to Bangor I wouldn’t start from here.” If you intended to build a Christian culture, you wouldn’t start to build within the confines of Liberaldom, but like the lost cosmopolitan we are here, so we must start from here.

Liberaldom was built by Europeans who came to hate, like the followers of Caiaphas, the Word made flesh. The intellectual Christians refused to oppose the liberals because the Word of God had not taken root in their hearts; when the persecution came, in the form of “you are stupid” and/or “you are racist,” the intellectual Christians caved in to liberalism. There is no way we, as a people, can return to Christ unless we circumcise our hearts and ask Him to make us the “good ground.” Then, in the midst of Liberaldom, we will see the quicksand of Satan become the “good ground” of Christian Europe once again.

Satan has become the ruler of the European world (the non-European world always belonged to Satan) by destroying, through the theologians, the heart to heart connection between God and man. Both the Roman Catholic theologians and the Protestant theologians decided that God could not enter human hearts, because human hearts were sinful. God was only able to enter special human minds – their minds – and those special minds could tell the sin-laden people all about God. But God’s word is meant for human hearts. Words from the heart are the substance of all our sacred bonds in life. If we cannot speak the language of love from the heart, how can we love?

If a heathen language – let us say, Chinese, though I know not with how much or little right – did not have the words and expressions for the invisible yet living God as the Lord of all things visible, then the Spirit of Christ could not possibly reveal either itself or the Word of God’s mercy in that language. To reveal oneself and divine truth to someone can only happen through words that are known and can be appropriated, making that person aware of God and the divine, the invisible, and the eternal—which is what these things are in truth. – N.F.S. Grundtvig, Human Comes First

The Bible is not the living word of God if it comes to us from the minds of theologians, nor are the church documents the living word of God if they come to us as the gospel according to the Illuminati. The scientizing of man started with the scientizing of God. There is a direct line between the Christian scholastics and the modern day psychologists, anthropologists, and sociologists who want to scientize our language so that there is no poetic content left in our culture. Once the poetic heart of our language is eliminated, there will be no spiritual contact between man and man and there will be no spiritual contact between God and man. All will be “cheerless, dark and deadly.” That is not quite accurate; it is more accurate to say that all is “cheerless, dark and deadly.” Western man has entered the anesthetized stage of European history in which the European people must be anesthetized by the superficialities of materialism and/or the opiates of drugs and alcohol. The spiritual realm of life is not even a shadow on the wall, it has disappeared in the mists of our forgotten history. Never to return again? We shall see; what once existed can exist again.

The bards who came from the “good ground” of Christian Europe and did not reject their people, bards such as Shakespeare, Scott, and Dickens, tell us stories about the interaction between Christ and His people. But I am only speaking of those bards who wrote from a heart connected to their people. I am not speaking of poets such as Shelley and Byron who made a conscious decision to stand, like Satan and the theologians, apart from their people. There are many works from the heart of Christian Europe that speak to us still if we would open our hearts to the Word made flesh. Let us look at Dickens’ masterpiece Great Expectations as a for-instance, not with the mind of a post-Christian literary critic, but with the heart of an antique European. Pip’s journey from light to darkness and back to the light can be our journey. He has a home, a Christian home, because of Joe Gargery who helps offset the cruelty of Pip’s older sister who is “bringing him up by hand.” But once he has contact with the ‘higher’ intellectual culture of Miss Havisham and Estella, he can no longer be content with his home:

It is a most miserable thing to feel ashamed of home. There may be black ingratitude in the thing, and the punishment may be retributive and well deserved; but that it is a miserable thing, I can testify.

Home had never been a very pleasant place to me, because of my sister’s temper. But, Joe had sanctified it, and I had believed in it. I had believed in the best parlor as a most elegant saloon; I had believed in the front door, as a mysterious portal of the Temple of State whose solemn opening was attended with a sacrifice of roast fowls; I had believed in the kitchen as a chaste though not magnificent apartment; I had believed in the forge as the glowing road to manhood and independence. Within a single year all this was changed. Now it was all coarse and common, and I would not have had Miss Havisham and Estella see it on any account.

When we became ashamed of our racial home, in which we knew our Lord through his people who believed in the Word made flesh, we became the unpeople without souls to call our own. The way a man speaks about God reveals how he feels about God and his people. Do the theologians speak of Christ as St. Paul spoke about Christ? Do the theologians speak of Christ as Christ spoke of Himself? If our faith is in the theologians and the theologians’ church, our faith is not rooted in the “good ground,” which is the European people when they had hearts of flesh, it is rooted in the thorns and stony ground, which allows the devil to enter into a man’s heart.

The liberals are currently putting the finishing touches on the de-Christianization of the European people. The BBC News notes that Facebook “has agreed to give the names of French users who are suspected of using hate speech on its platform to the courts when requested.” And what, according to the great liberal tribunal, is hate speech? “Illegal hate speech is defined by the European Commission as public conduct that incites violence or hatred to groups of people defined by characteristics such as race, religion, and ethnic origin.” Let us translate that doublespeak: It is forbidden to say anything against the forces of evil who are intent on destroying every last vestige of the people who once believed in the Word made flesh. Every blasphemy against the God of the antique Europeans shall be permitted, and every atrocity, no matter how cruel and merciless, committed against white people shall be permitted, but there shall be no criticism or resistance, in word or deed, to the liberals’ purge of the white Christ-bearing race. Our theologians, the church men, gave up their defense of Christ and His people many years ago. Who will speak a word in His and their behalf now?

“In the beginning was the Word.” The devil knows that. That is why the liberals, who are under the influence of Satan, attack any manifestation of the Word made flesh. We must not abandon that word. We must love our people and our God with hearts of flesh, and we must express that love with words that come from the heart, not with the words of the theologians and the psychologists, which are devil words used to destroy our heart-to-heart connection to the living God. Let me return to Pip, of Great Expectations. He returns to the God of his ascending race and to the love of his racial and familial hearth fire through the love of a repentant sinner. At the deathbed of that repentant sinner, Pip unites his love for his benefactor, the repentant sinner, with our Lord’s love for all repentant sinners. And he uses the language of love:

With a last faint effort, which would have been powerless but for my yielding to it and assisting it, he raised my hand to his lips. Then, he gently let it sink upon his breast again, with his own hands lying on it. The placid look at the white ceiling came back, and passed away, and his head dropped quietly on his breast.

Mindful, then, of what we had read together, I thought of the two men who went up into the Temple to pray, and I knew there were no better words that I could say beside his bed, than “O Lord, be merciful to him a sinner!”

If we unite our love for our people to His love, the love that passeth the knowledge of the theologians, the philosophers, and the psychologists, we will not perish as a people nor will He leave us bereft of comfort in our battle against the pestilence of liberalism, which commands us to walk in darkness and die at the hands of Satan.

St. Paul enjoins us to, “Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.” And what is the whole armor of God? Is it the knowledge of the theologians? No, it is the Word made flesh. It is the knowledge of a heart connected to Him. We face an enemy in the liberals, much crueler than the cruel tyrants of the Old Testament, such as Darius and Nebuchadnezzar. We face a post-Christian enemy that hates Christ and His people with a fury that can only come from one source. Our ancient foe doth indeed seek to work us woe. The triumph of liberalism is his triumph. There is only one defense against the merciless, satanic assault of the liberals. We must unequivocally commit our hearts to the Word made flesh, while forsaking the scientized culture of death, championed by the liberals and the theological purveyors of Christless Christianity. We stand with Daniel in the lion’s den and with all the Europeans, our honored dead, who saw the living God with hearts of flesh. +

Posted in Europeans and Christ, Good ground of Christian culture, Religion of Satan | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Great Liberal Tribunal

The Bowstrings of the Spirit

Posted on June 22, 2019 by cwny

It was a dry cold night, and the wind blew keenly, and the frost was white and hard. A man would die to-night of lying out on the marshes, I thought. And then I looked at the stars, and considered how awful it would be for a man to turn his face up to them as he froze to death, and see no help or pity in all the glittering multitude. – Great Expectations

When Walt Disney died, the entire technical crew, the cartoonists, the directors, the writers, who had been with Walt, remained. But Disney Studies never, after Walt’s death, put out anything even remotely as good as the type of movies and cartoons that came out of Disney Studies when Walt was alive. The heart of the studio was dead. In a similar vein there was the Inklings, a club of writers that C. S. Lewis started, to form a counter-culture within Academia that was opposed to the anti-Christian bias of Academia. When C. S. Lewis died, the Inklings died. In both cases, Disney Studios and the Inklings, the old forms survived, but the substance was gone, because the substance of Disney Studies and the substance of the Inklings depended on the heart and soul of one man. “But O for the touch of a vanished hand, and the sound of a voice that is still.”

We currently live in an anti-civilization, a world completely opposed to the civilization of old Europe, because we have lost contact with the God-Man who was and is the heart and soul of our civilization. Many of the outer forms of the old Europe still remain, but it is crystal clear that the substance of modern Europe is not the substance of old Europe. New Europe and old Europe are two diametrically opposed worlds. That fact seems too obvious to have to be stated, but it needs to be stated over and over again, because it is not obvious to the conservatives and the grazers, the people who constitute the great majority of the European people. Only the liberals realize that a new world, their world, has been built over the ruins of old Europe. The conservatives still cling to their Augustinian reading of history: “There can never be a Christian culture. Everything outside the organizational structure called the Church is the realm of the barbarians. Let us take refuge behind the hollowed walls of Christian academia.” Such logic leaves out the great miracle, the conversion of the European tribesmen that Thomas Nelson Page writes about:

On the instant stood revealed, as though he had blown down the ages, a pure Goth, unchanged in any essential since his fathers had left their forests and through all obstacles, even through ranks of Roman legionaries, sword in hand had hewn their way straight to the goal of their desires. He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart—a Goth.

How can we forget those Europeans who saw that Odin was the forerunner of Christ and who carved out a place for Christ in the midst of a heathen world? All that was good, all that elevated the European people to another realm, a better realm of existence than mere paganism, stemmed from the European tribesmen’s leap across the pagan divide from Odin to Christ. If that conversion never occurred, if those Europeans were not really Christian, and the real Christian men and women are still in the future, a future purged of the false Christ of the European people, then we are of all men most to be pitied, for we have believed a lie.

“That is no tragedy,” the liberals tell us, “You can become like us and cavort around the throne of the sacred negro, which is true happiness and eternal bliss.” If barbarism is happiness and the extinction of the human personality is bliss, then the liberals are right: we should join them in their long day’s journey into the beautiful night of Liberaldom. The white grazers have no problem with the darkness of liberalism, because the conservatives tell them that “darkness is right,” that there never was a Narnian upper world, there is only the liberals’ world of eternal night. In that world there are the four freedoms, freedom to worship the sacred negro, freedom to speak the praises of the sacred negro, freedom from fear, namely the fear of the living God, and freedom from want, which is the freedom to give up the bread of life, which is Christ the Lord, in order to obtain the things of this world only. The white grazers have been bound hand and foot by their ‘conservative’ leaders and turned over to the liberal torturers. In the name of a pure Christian future that is always on the horizon, but never actually materializes, the conservative intellectuals have betrayed the only civilization that was genuinely Christian in order to join with the liberals in the building of a civilization that is a new Babel, a hell on earth.

The reason why the conservatives work within the perimeters of liberalism in order to effect change rather than attack liberalism itself is because the modern conservatives are not Burkean conservatives. It was Burke’s contention that prior to the French Revolution, “The nations of Europe have had the very same Christian religion, agreeing in the fundamental parts, varying a little in the ceremonies and in the subordinate doctrines.” Because the nations of Europe were Christian and the Jacobins were opposed to Christianity, Burke maintained that Christian Britain and the rest of the European nations could not, without betraying the moral essence of their nations, make peace with the Jacobin government whether Robespierre or the Directory was in charge of it. But the nations of Europe did make peace with the Jacobins, and we, the European people, have been paying the consequences of that ‘peace’ for centuries, in small dribs and drabs at first, but now, in the 21st century, we are paying the price with our blood.

During the French Revolution, Jacobin sympathizers throughout the European nations were either completely indifferent to — or, in many instances, they rejoiced at — the torture and murder of white Christians. And they justified their indifference and/or their exaltation by claiming that the murdered whites were insufficiently Christian, so they deserved to be killed:

What ferocity of character drew on the fate of Elizabeth, the sister of King Lewis the 16th? For which of the vices of that pattern of benevolence, of piety, and of all the virtues, did they put her to death? For which of her vices did they put to death the mildest of all human creatures, the Duchess of Biron? What were the crimes of those crowds of Matrons and Virgins of condition, whom they massacred, with their juries of blood, in prisons and on scaffolds? What were the enormities of the Infant King, whom they caused by lingering tortures to perish in their dungeon, and whom if at last they despatched by poison, it was in that detestable crime the only act of mercy they have ever shewn?

What softening of character is to be had, what review of their social situations and duties is to be taught by these examples, to Kings, to Nobles, to Men of Property, to Women, and to Infants? The Royal Family perished, because it was royal. The Nobles perished, because they were noble. The Men, Women and Children, who had property, because they had property to be robbed of. The Priests were punished, after they had been robbed of their all, not for their vices, but for their virtues and their piety, which made them an honour to their sacred profession, and to that nature, of which we ought to be proud, since they belong to it. My Lord, nothing can be learned from such examples, except the danger of being Kings, Queens, Nobles, Priests, and Children to be butchered on account of their inheritance. – Letters on a Regicide Peace

Is such liberal ferocity in the past? No, it is not, it is still with us. Have not the liberals countenanced the massacre of the whites in South Africa because they were ‘racists’ and therefore outside the ken of humanity? And haven’t the conservatives ignored the plight of pro-Apartheid whites in South Africa because they were insufficiently Christian, because they were – horror of horrors – white separatists? But South Africa really is the entire Western world. The liberals must destroy everything white because old Europe was Christian, and the conservatives will not defend old Europe or the continued existence of whites who champion old Europe, because the antique Europeans, from their utopian viewpoint, were insufficiently Christian. Belloc, the ‘conservative’ Catholic, was an ardent supporter of the Jacobins because he felt that the murdered aristocrats were insufficiently Catholic, so they deserved to be purged. That ‘conservative’ angelism is what enables the liberals to reign unopposed. And if the great purgers are not opposed, they will enlarge their vision of the purge. It is no longer the aristocrats who must be destroyed, it is all the non-illuminated whites who must be blotted off the face of the earth. Rich or poor, all whites have become aristocrats in the eyes of the liberal Jacobins.

The liberals’ onslaught has intensified in the 21st century because there is no longer any Christian check on their hatred, and it has intensified because every individual white fears that he will be found wanting, that he will be seen as too white, making him one of the non-illuminated whites who must go to the guillotine. This is why white liberals scream ‘racist’ at the top of their lungs at the slightest pretext and more often than not with no pretext whatsoever. They must prove that they are illuminated whites who have transcended whiteness. They live in the hope that the dark gods of liberalism will place a mark on their door so that the angel of death will leave them alone. But the dark gods of liberalism are not gods of mercy: they will kill the illuminated whites just as readily as the non-illuminated whites.

And the conservatives? Will they resist the liberals’ onslaught? No, they won’t. Their mission in life is to preserve impersonal, cosmic, Chardinian Christianity, and impersonal, abstract democracy. Individual human beings, particularly non-illuminated white human beings, do not interest them. They live for the future, a future in which they have won the illuminated debate with their liberal cousins and the world is run according to their Socratic, white minds, which have transcended racism, provincialism, and all feelings, including a passion for the living God, that stem from the human heart. The European with a heart that still lives must reject the inhumanity of Christless liberalism and its cousin, intellectual Christianity, which is also Christless because it lacks a heart of flesh, grounded in pietas.

If the words and sounds mean nothing–
‘people’ and ‘the fatherland’—
if for us they have no meaning
more than numbers, earth, and strand,
futile is all formulation,
all talk of ‘God’s congregation’
or God’s kingdom’s hills and vales.

If our hearts lack any feeling
that we are a race divine,
if no pain that with this calling
we ourselves could not align,
we mock words we cannot follow,
make ‘redeemed’, ‘reborn’ sound hollow,
though God wants us as His own.

In the people’s mouth the Word tells
what the world has never seen;
when the Word sounds in the heart’s depth,
only hearts know what it means;
for the bowstrings of the spirit
and the flaming heart’s sweet lyric
are the echo of God’s Word.

-N.F.S. Grundtvig

Throughout the gospels, the scribes and the Pharisees follow Christ around in order to mock Him and to tally up His transgressions against the law. When He tells them why He heals people on the Sabbath and why He eats with publicans and sinners, the scribes and the Pharisees never listen to His explanations. They are not interested, because they have only one concern – their own power. And Christ is a threat to their power. Some of the scribes and Pharisees might even have suspected that Christ was indeed the Son of God, but that doesn’t matter to them. It is this world, and this world only, that they care about. The modern scribes and Pharisees in the liberal-conservative camps have applied the sneer and the tally sheet of transgressions against the liberals’ law to the antique Europeans who gave their hearts to Christ. “Seek and ye shall find.” The friends of the man who was sick with the palsy found a way to bring their friend to Christ. They lowered him down from a hole they made in the ceiling. Is it really so difficult to find the Son of the living God if we go to the heart of old Europe? Isn’t He the moral essence of that civilization? We must have a ground to stand on, the words ‘people’ and ‘the fatherland’ must be our connection to the God who enters human hearts. My God, who is Jesus Christ, and my people, who are the antique Europeans, formed a union of hearts with Christ. Who shall sever us from that union? Certainly not the liberals, and certainly not their conservative brethren. The bonds of the heart should never be broken. And they shall not be broken. Outside of those bonds is cold, merciless death – within those bonds is mercy, love, and life. +

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Faithful hearts, Jacobinism, Pride of intellect | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Bowstrings of the Spirit

No More Night

Posted on June 15, 2019 by cwny

The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: But because the Lord loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the Lord brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. Know therefore that the Lord thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations. –Deuteronomy 7: 7-9

Toward the end of Thomas Aird’s poem “The Devil’s Dream on Mount Aksbeck,” the devil is offered a chance to accept the mercy of God:

At last, from out the barren womb of many thousand years,
A sound as of the green-leaved earth his thirsty spirit cheers;
And, oh, a presence soft and cool came o’er his burning dream,
A form of beauty clad about with fair creation’s beam;
A low sweet voice was in his ear, thrilled through his inmost soul,
And these the words that bowed his heart with softly sad control:—

“No sister e’er hath been to thee with pearly eyes of love;
No mother e’er hath wept for thee, an outcast from above;
No hand hath come from out the cloud to wash thy scarrèd face;
No voice to bid thee lie in peace, the noblest of thy race:
But bow thee to the God of Love, and all shall yet be well,
And yet in days of holy peace and love thy soul shall dwell.

“And thou shalt dwell ‘mid leaves and rills far from this torrid heat,
And I with streams of cooling milk will bathe thy blistered feet;
And when the troubled tears shall start to think of all the past,
My mouth shall haste to kiss them off, and chase thy sorrows fast;
And thou shalt walk in soft white light with kings and priests abroad,
And thou shalt summer high in bliss upon the hills of God.”

The devil rejects God’s mercy:

So knew the Fiend, and fain would he down to oblivion go;
But back from fear his spirit proud, recoiling like a bow,
Sprung. O’er his head he saw the heavens upstayèd bright and high;
The planets, undisturbed by him, were shining in the sky;
The silent magnanimity of Nature and her God
With anguish smote his haughty soul, and sent his Hell abroad.

At Eastertime we greet our fellow Christians with, “Christ has risen!,” and the reply is, “Indeed He has!” One can picture the devils in hell commenting on the success of their master:

1st Junior Devil: “Our master has sent his hell abroad.”

2nd Junior Devil: “Indeed he has.”

The devil has been enormously successful in the past 100 years; he has sent his hell abroad throughout the European world, the only world where Christ once held a significant place. But there is an irony involved in the devil’s success. That proud spirit had to get the consent of the very creatures he hates in order to work his will upon them. Isn’t that rather ignoble, to prowl about the world trying to ruin souls by trickery instead of a straight-forward challenge? Yes, in my opinion it is rather ignoble, but then I am not privy to the innermost thoughts – nor do I want to be – of the devil. Perhaps he is able to save his ego by some sophistry we do not understand, but howsoever he convinces himself that petty treachery is compatible with his pride, he does work his will upon mankind by making it appear that what men desire most is what the devil can provide for them.

There never was a time when the temptations of the devil were not appealing, but I think Charles Maturin gets it right in his novel Melmoth the Wanderer, in which he depicts men and women of old Europe, whom the devil asks to give up their souls for what he can give them. They ultimately refuse to give up their souls; the devil fails. Why does he fail? He fails because those Europeans lived in a Europe that was consecrated to Christ. Our Savior was still present in the hearts of the European people in the ‘unenlightened’ days of Christian Europe. There were limits to the evils they did, because Christ was present in their hearts. And so long as He is present within the human breast, Satan cannot enter. But once the European people’s heart-to-heart covenant with Christ was broken, Satan can, will, and did become the ruler of the European people. The constant turning away from God and the turning back to God in the Old Testament is the story of a heart-to-heart covenant, the breaking of that covenant, and the return to the covenant. When Moses, the people’s connection to the living God, went up to Mt. Sinai, the Hebrew people felt abandoned by God and returned to Baal. The European people have made the same return to Baal, which is a return to nature and nature’s gods, as the Hebrews did when Moses ‘abandoned’ them.

The Grand Inquisitor hurls the accusation, “You abandoned mankind,” at Christ. And what is Christ’s answer? He does not give an answer. It seems that Satan is there for us, but our Lord is not. That is the crux of the matter. Is there a realm of existence that “knows not seems?” Hamlet’s mother did not see the vision from another world vouchsafed to Hamlet, yet she asserted with certainty, “I see nothing, yet all that there is I see.” The scholastics thought there was no incompatibility between reason and revelation: “Since all that is can be known by reason, including God’s revelation, why should we not place reason on an equal level with revelation?” Why indeed? We should not place human reason and God’s revelation on an equal level because we cannot know God through reason. Reason forms no covenants, it only draws up contracts. Reason cannot see beyond what seems. If we look at God’s word through the eyes of reason, it appears that He does not answer prayer and that He lied about His imminent return. But if we approach His holy word with our hearts, and if we pray with our hearts, does not a different picture of God emerge, distinct from the absentee God whom we see with the eyes of reason? All deep thought comes from the heart – if we refuse to think from the heart we will never see anything other than the material world, the world of Baal.

Once reason contemplating nature became synonymous with revelation the stage was set for the triumph of Satan in the Western world. Satan started his own back-to-nature movement. The clergymen told their people that God was in nature, which opened the door for the liberals, who took that clerical maxim one step further – “God is nature.” Our modern non-civilization is a synthesis of the ‘rational’ civilizations of Babel, Sodom and Gomorrah, and Egypt. The European people prefer their Egyptian night to Christian Europe, but why do they prefer that night? They have no heart left for God; that is why they have chosen the night of science and the dark races over Christ. Science will sustain them where Christ has failed them, and the sacred negro will allow them to feel connected to Baal.

In my lifetime, I have seen the devastation caused by the liberals’ rationalistic attack on Christ. I had a college professor who spoke for that whole world of liberal vipers. In class after class, he pounded home his theme, “Where is the life in a dead body? How can you believe in a God that cannot help you in this world and cannot sustain life in your body after you leave this world?” If, like Lady Macbeth, we have made thick our blood and stopped up “th’ access and passage to remorse” then we cannot answer the liberals. Nor can we answer the liberals if we have accepted the clergymen’s anti-vision of God – that He does not enter human hearts, He only comes to enlightened minds. But if we have a heart for God, if we are drawn to Him by something in our hearts that is beyond reason, we will know that He has not abandoned us on this earth and He will not abandon us in the world to come. It was not a little thing, our connection to the antique Europeans, it was everything, because through those hearts of flesh, we touched the heart of God.

The conservatives of the 20th century such as Weaver, Tate, and Kirk, all proceeded under the assumption that the disease of liberalism could be cured by rational analysis. But rational analysis, whether it is the rational analysis of a liberal or a liberal conservative, is not true thought, because it does not encompass the wellspring of thought, the human heart. Stavrogin, in Dostoyevsky’s novel The Devils, is rational to the end:

The citizen of the Canton of Uri was dangling just by the door. On the table there was a scrap of paper with the words, “Accuse no one, I did it myself,” written in pencil. Next to it on the table there was also a hammer, a piece of soap, and a large nail, apparently in case the other one hadn’t held up. The strong silk cord on which Nicolai Stavrogin had hanged himself was lavishly smeared with soap. All this indicated that to the last second he was in full possession of his mental faculties and had acted with premeditation.
After the autopsy, all our medical experts rejected any possibility of insanity.

Stavrogin’s end is our end if we continue to see with the rational jewels of the head rather than with the eyes of the heart. Before the churchmen decided we could combat the king of rationalism with our own reason, separated from a spirit-infused heart, there were integral men, our European progenitors, who spoke of a different way:

Now with zeal we must search our breasts shrewdly, the vices within, with the eyes of the heart. With the other eyes, the jewels of the head, we cannot at all see through the spirit of the thought, whether good or evil dwells beneath, so that it may be pleasing unto God at the dread time. –Anglo-Saxon Poetry

The synthesis of Babel, Sodom and Gomorrah, and the Egyptian night needs a rationalist base to hold it together. If even a few Europeans thought with their hearts, that synthesis of evil would start to crumble. The modern Europeans are proceeding as if nature, the nature which can be dissected and analyzed by rational minds, is all. Our young people are brought up to believe that they should welcome the assault of the colored heathens on the white race and spend their lives combating racism and global warming. The great rationalist, utopian state that Lincoln hoped would “long endure” has given birth to a brood of vipers, conceived and nurtured by the rationalism of the devil. And if we are one with Satan in his rationalism, we will be one with him in his estrangement from God and humanity:

O’er soft and unsubstantial shades which towering visions seem,
Through kingdoms of forlorn repose, went on the hurrying dream;
Till down where feet of hills might be, he by a Lake was stayed
Of still red fire—a molten plate of terror unalloyed–
A mirror where Jehovah’s Wrath, in majesty alone,
Comes in the night of worlds to see its armour girded on.

The awful walls of shadows round might dusky mountains seem,
But never holy light hath touched an outline with its gleam;
‘Tis but the eye’s bewildered sense that fain would rest on form,
And make night’s thick blind presence to created shapes conform.
No stone is moved on mountain here by creeping creature crossed;
No lonely harper comes to harp upon this fiery coast.

–Thomas Aird

It was only the ethical remnant of what was once the European people’s heartfelt faith in Christ crucified, Christ risen that sustained the European people in the latter half of the 20th century. Now that the ethical remnant has been destroyed, there is no “holy light” left over Europe. All is darkness. Dylan Thomas was aware of the dying of the light, but he was unable to trace that light back to its source, so he died in an alcoholic stupor. At least he had the heart to know that life was unbearable without the light. That is the beginning of wisdom. Is it possible to go any further, to actually move toward God’s “holy light”? Before there was Nature, there was the God who was and is greater than nature. How do we know that? Because of what is inside of us that yearns for something, for someone, beyond nature. We who are about to die need that “holy light” to illuminate our hearts and give us a glimpse of a spiritual realm of existence that transcends the shallow, closed-in world of darkness that has become the only world for the modern Europeans.

The counter-revolution cannot begin until we throw off the chains of nature and nature’s gods. It is not impossible to break those chains, but we must leave the dungeons of academia behind and venture forth into the open air of that other realm, the realm of visionary hearts of flesh who loved so much that they saw their beginning and their end in the cross of Christ. I don’t see any hope for our people until we, the last Europeans, stand up to the principalities and powers of the Liberaldom and declare that this, our modern utopia of science and the sacred negroes, is not heaven on earth, it is hell. A hell we reject in the name of Christ’s holy light that once shone over the European people, as the Star of Bethlehem once shone over the shepherds on that night of nights when the light of the world came to us through our incarnate Lord. +

Posted in Negro worship, Pride of intellect, Rationalism, Religion of Satan | Tagged , | Comments Off on No More Night

Keep Thy Heart

Posted on June 8, 2019 by cwny

When on that shivering winter’s night, the Pequod thrust her vindictive bows into the cold malicious waves, who should I see standing at her helm but Bulkington! I looked with sympathetic awe and fearfulness upon the man, who in mid-winter just landed from a four years’ dangerous voyage, could so unrestingly push off again for still another tempestuous term. The land seemed scorching to his feet… But as in landlessness alone resides the highest truth, shoreless, indefinite as God—so, better is it to perish in that howling infinite, than be ingloriously dashed upon the lee, even if that were safety! For worm-like, then, oh! who would craven crawl to land! Terrors of the terrible! is all this agony so vain? Take heart, take heart, O Bulkington! –Melville, Moby Dick

Then keep thy heart, though yet but ill-resigned—
Clarel, thy heart, the issues there but mind;
That like the crocus budding through the snow–
That like a swimmer rising from the deep–
That like a burning secret which doth go
Even from the bosom that would hoard and keep;
Emerge thou mayst from the last whelming sea,
And prove that death but routs life into victory.

– Melville, Clarel

Maybe I am alone in my need for heroes, men who have gone before me who have loved what I love and fought for what I love. Some people regard that need as a weakness, a moral failing; if that is so, then I am morally weak. I don’t expect perfection from my heroes; I believe in original sin. What I need from my heroes is a reverence for Him, in and through the European people. For this reason most of my heroes predate the 20th century, because the 19th century, even though science had most certainly reared its satanic head in that century, was the last century in which the best of the European people still loved Christ at their racial hearth fire.

One of the exceptions to my ‘no heroes in the 20th century’ credo had been Anthony Jacob, who wrote White Man, Think Again!, a book that was published and then banned in South Africa in 1965. What struck me about Anthony Jacob was that he actually seemed to care, in contrast to other 20th century conservatives, about white people. And he also, in contrast to the 20th century neo-pagans, seemed to understand the importance of the European people’s connection to Jesus Christ. There were many passages in his great work that led me to believe that Anthony Jacob was not a 20th century agnostic:

Only sham love compromises; genuine love never does because it never can, because love is the comprehension of life itself – and is a form of light. It is not love that evades vital (i.e. ‘life-full’) issues or runs away or talks false peace; it is love that fights to the death, for it knows that to compromise is to dilute, and that to dilute love is to kill it. That is why the gentle, hard-as-nails Jesus (who taught us to disdain death; not, like the Orientals, to disdain life) came with a sword in his hand….

It is surely not wise for the Church to pander to this idolatry. Even if Christianity were to be the religion only of a select few, it would be none the worse for that. Has it ever been anything else but the religion of a select few, and can it ever be anything else? Christianity is the religion of the White and not the non-White peoples, who debase it even where they accept it. They might pay lip-service to it where the white man is strong and his institutions accordingly respected, or where it has obtained a form of superstitious hold over them. But they can no more accept and comprehend essential Christianity than the white man can accept Shamanism. This, above all, makes it all the more reprehensible that the Church, instead of recognizing this, should swing round viciously upon the white man and hold him to blame for it – that white man upon whose unadulterated identity Christianity exclusively depends.

So was Anthony Jacob a Christian? A new edition of White Man, Think Again! (2017) has been published in which the editor, a ‘friend’ of Anthony Jacob, tells us that Jacob had no religion:

Secondly, and Tony did not have to be told to do this, as he “knew it by himself,” as he said to me, the book would have to have a decidedly pro-Christian slant, even though personally, he was not a believer in any religion. This was because Christianity was one of the mainstays of Afrikaner nationalism, and the Voortrekker Press would simply not publish a book which did not hold that position.

The phrase, “a sword shall pierce your heart” describes my reaction to Kemp’s assertion. Does that negate everything Anthony Jacob ever wrote? No, of course not. Anthony Jacob was the most eloquent and courageous defender of the white race in the 20th century, and his assessments of the black African people, the liberals, and the white people of Africa have stood the test of time. What Kemp says about Jacob’s religious indifference touches me to the core of my being, but it in no way negates anything Anthony Jacob wrote. Why am I so affected? Because I loved Anthony Jacob for what he said in defense of my people. I felt, when I read of his indifference to Christianity, as I felt when I learned of my mother’s agnosticism. I still loved her, but I could no longer trust her as a guiding light. In terms of faith, I had to keep a spiritual distance from my mother. So it is with Anthony Jacob. When I first read White Man, Think Again! some forty years ago, the passion of Mr. Jacob entered my soul; he was one of my heroes. Now? He is a great man, whom I admire, but he is no longer my hero.

Not all those who say ‘Lord, Lord’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven; I think there is more of Christ in a man such as Anthony Jacob, who loves his people, than there is in a thousand intellectual Christians who are willing to sacrifice their fellow whites on altars consecrated to the sacred negroes. But a man, if he is to be truly a man, needs to be connected to His people through the God of love. The question of Christ’s resurrection from the dead can never be a matter of indifference. The older neo-pagans such as Samuel Francis, John Tyndall, and alas, Anthony Jacob, respected Christianity as a magnificent creation of the white race. The second and third tiers of neo-pagans spit on Christ, lumping Him in with their Jewish enemies. The older neo-pagans make for better company, but neither view is acceptable. All talk about race is meaningless if Christ be not risen. Why should I care about keeping my people separate and distinct from the people of other races if there is no God who has made my people separate and distinct from other races? The charity which begins at home and perishes without one, which Anthony Jacob writes so eloquently about, has a source. If white people are cut off from that source, they will become – no, they have become – men without souls doomed to look at life second-hand through the dark races, as the liberals view life, or through their own mind-forged fantasy world of pure intelligence, as the intellectual Christians and neo-pagans view life. It is always the same hurdle that must be overcome, the hurdle of intellectual pride. Are we too intelligent to believe that Jesus of Nazareth was and is the Son of the living God?I am not too intelligent to believe in that God.And I don’t understand, nor do I want to understand, why the men of ‘intelligence’ find it easier to believe in their petty, puny minds than in the heart of Christ.

Men like Arthur Kemp are very good at handing out practical advice, based on animal husbandry and demographics, but their knowledge is grounded in empiricism, which is the quicksand of the devil. This empirical knowledge appears to be safe, solid ground, unlike the mystic waters of Christian Europe, but the quicksand envelops a man and chokes the life out of him while the great raging sea brings us, if we look to Christ to guide us, safely home. There is a link between Bulkington, the true hero of Melville’s Moby Dick, who chooses landlessness over the empirical land, and the pilgrim Clarel, who finishes his earthly pilgrimage with a vision of the living ‘God. Bulkington is Clarel.

The neo-pagan Nikos Kazantzakis, the author of The Last Temptation of Christ and Zorba the Greek, gives us a glimpse, in his autobiography, of the neo-pagans’ pride of reason. Kazantzakis rewrites the prodigal son story. He has the prodigal son, upon his return, tell his brother, “I failed but you shall succeed. Leave our father and become a success on your own.” Why did the story of the prodigal son fail to stir Kazantzakis’ heart? Because Kazantzakis believed that the mark of a man is that he kneels to no-one, not even to our Father which art in heaven. In contrast to Kazantzakis is Johanna Spyri, the author of Heidi. The grandfather in Heidi comes down from the mountain to reconnect with his people and his God after his meditation on the story of the prodigal son. Is it really so terrible to admit one has sinned and then to ask for forgiveness from the God of mercy? “Yes, it is,” says the neo-pagan, “because there is no God, only a sickly Jewish carpenter whom the Judaic-Christians call their God.” And the ‘Christian’ equivalent of the neo-pagans, the scholastics, create their own God of pure intellect so that when they worship, they worship their own minds.

Pastor N. F. S. Grundtvig of Denmark saw that his people could only know the living God if they searched the Scriptures, as St. Paul enjoined them to do, with their hearts. With the prophetic heart of that second tier of Christian prophets who warned us what would happen if we abandoned the prophetic fire and the prophetic knowledge of the one true God, Grundtvig told us that the holy word of God was rendered null and void if it was sifted through the minds of theologians.In order for the Word of God to take root in our hearts, Grundtvig maintained, it had to come to us undiluted by theological experts. The theological expert is the creation of Satan because through him Satan can turn everything into an intellectual construct. And Satan is undefeated in the intellectual arena.

The living God cannot come to us through His holy Word if His holy Word becomes, which it has become, the sole property of theological experts. And the story of our people, of their love affair with Jesus Christ, as told by the European bards, can only be received in our hearts if we hear that story from the bards themselves, unobstructed by creatures called literary critics. Do you see the hellish closed circle that has enveloped the European people? They have gone from being free men who belong to Christ to being the bond slaves of Satan, who keeps his kingdom in order by constantly appealing to the Europeans’ pride of intellect, manifested in their faith in experts who have scientized life. An automobile can be scientized, but not a man, and certainly not the Lord God. The Roman Catholic scholastics and then the Protestant scholastics who followed in their train, scientized God in order to hand Him to the laity in a neat little box with a golden ribbon on it and a label that read, “Not to be opened except by the clergy.” Pope Francis the blasphemer spoke for all the anti-Christian Christians when, in a recent audience, he wagged his finger at the faithful and warned them they could not go directly to God, they must go through the Church. Through the Church consisting of men and women who believe in Christ the Lord? No, that is not the Church which Francis the blasphemer is referring to. He is referring to the Church as an assembly of great minds who have taken upon themselves the right to determine who and what God is. Small wonder, particularly since the church men have decided that the negro is God, that the neo-pagans have chosen to reject intellectual Christianity for the Sturm und Drang of neo-paganism. But in the end, Pope Francis the blasphemer and the Christian intellectuals are spiritually united to the neo-pagans, because both camps have chosen to reject the living God for an abstract God that emanates from their minds. The blaspheming Christian intellectuals have chosen the noble black savage while the neo-pagans have chosen their superior white genes. The pope’s mind-forged heresy will always triumph over the neo-pagans’ heresy, because the Europeans will always cling to the heresy that has a personal savior. The neo-pagans have no savior in their religion.

It is often the good swimmer that drowns, because he places too much confidence in his ability to conquer the ocean currents unaided by anything other than his own athletic prowess. So it is with human intelligence. It is almost always the very smart men who fall victim to the snares of Satan. They think they can go it alone, without recourse to the living God, and as a consequence they end up prisoners of Satan and science. It is Dogberry, the bumbling constable in Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing,who discovers and brings to light the villainous machinations of Don John the bastard and his evil cohorts. The smart men, such as Claudio and Antonio, were unable to see and discover the villainy of Don John because they had too much confidence in their own intelligence. St. Paul tells us that the foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of men. If we become foolish as He was ‘foolish,’ we will be able to see visions that the intelligent men do not see. The men of intellect who inhabit the first circle of hell, the virtuous pagans such as Anthony Jacob, Samuel Francis and John Tyndall, seem so wise in the ways of the world, but when we look closer we see that they are blinded by the same satanic ray of light that blinded Adam and Eve:

Adam was at the same time the most enlightened and the best of men; the most powerful in thought and the most powerful in love. But whatever has been created must necessarily have a progressive course. Instead of waiting for new attainments in knowledge to be derived from the revolution of ages, and to be accompanied by an accession of new feelings, Adam wanted to know every thing at once. Observe, too, what is very important: man had it in his power to destroy the harmony of his being in two ways, either by wanting to love too much, or to know too much. He transgressed in the second way; for we are, in fact, far more deeply tinctured with the pride of science than with the pride of love; the latter would have deserved pity rather than punishment, and if Adam had been guilty of desiring to feel rather than to know too much, man himself might, perhaps, have been able to expiate his transgression, and the Son of God would not have been obliged to under take so painful a sacrifice. But the case was different. Adam sought to embrace the universe, not with the sentiments of his heart, but with the power of thought, and, advancing to the tree of knowledge, he admitted into his mind a ray of light that over powered it. The equilibrium was instantaneously destroyed, and confusion took possession of man. Instead of that illumination which he had promised himself, a thick darkness overcast his sight, and his guilt, like a veil, spread out between him and the universe. His whole soul was agitated and in commotion; the passions rose up against the judgment, the judgment strove to annihilate the passions, and in this terrible storm the rock of death witnessed with joy the first of shipwrecks.

-Chateaubriand, The Genius of Christianity

I have often been disappointed – although in the case of Anthony Jacob it goes beyond disappointment – when I discovered that a man I thought was going to be my companion in the battle against the devil and his minions was not going to be my companion because he had no use for the Suffering Servant. But it is better to go into battle alone than to have a false ally who will desert you in the day of battle. We must accept a man’s word when he says he does not believe in Christ. But we can hope, if the tenor of his life revealed a sense of pietas, that at the last moment, at the hour of death, the man saw the risen Lord. That is my hope for that first tier of noble neo-pagans from whom I was estranged on this earth.

Now back to the present and the enemy before us. The liberals have intensified their merciless persecution of the white race. They have given their black shock troops virtual free reign to rape, torture, and murder white people; and neo-paganism, whether the Greco-Roman neo-paganism of the first tier neo-pagans, such as Jacob, Francis, and Tyndall, or the new, updated neo-paganism, whose adherents look to a future of white intelligence independent of the Greeks and Jesus Christ, will not be able to stop the bloodletting of the liberals and their colored allies. We need men who are firmly rooted, in spirit and blood, in Christian Europe. A merciless enemy can only be successfully opposed by men who fight in the name of the God of mercy.

A man fights for what he holds dear. It makes a difference whether a man treasures his white genes, the sacred negroes, or Jesus Christ, the first and the last. If we have taken Christ into our hearts, we will be connected to other hearts of flesh, living and dead, who have taken Christ into their hearts. That communion, the communion of saints, will sustain us against an enemy who is possessed by the devil. Without faith in the God whose love passeth the understanding of the colored barbarians, the liberals, and the neo-pagans, we can never restore our civilization or protect our people from the pestilence of liberalism and the arrows of the colored barbarians. We need to go beyond intelligence to the foolishness of God, the God who was so foolish that He was crucified for our sins: “He was oppressed, and He was afflicted, yet He opened not his mouth: He is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so He openeth not his mouth.” That God and kinsman cannot be a mere footnote in the white man’s history: He is our history.

The first tier of neo-pagans, such as Anthony Jacob, who had a certain respect for old Europe and her people but were unable to see that Christ was the spiritual fount of old Europe, are all gone now. The second and third tiers of neo-pagans have no respect for old Europe and her people. They look to a new Europe that is… What is that new Europe? What rough beast will we worship in the new Europe? The neo-pagans need to strike the ‘pagan’ from their name, because the real European pagans, our progenitors, bent their knees to Christ. They saw beauty on the cross. Where is the beauty in neo-paganism? The liberals tell us we must worship the dark races and make Christ one with the gods of heathendom, while the neo-pagans tell us we must worship Hitler and their white genes. Over and against the liberals and the neo-pagans is the Man on the white horse: He once was at the center of Europe. Now He rides alone on the periphery of Europe, ready to enter the lists again if we call on Him by name. +

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Neo-paganism | Tagged | Comments Off on Keep Thy Heart

Breaking Satan’s Rules

Posted on June 1, 2019 by cwny

This circumstance assures some degree of permanence to the power of those, whom we know to be permanently our rancourous and implacable enemies. But to those very enemies, who have sworn our destruction, we have ourselves given a further and far better security by rendering the cause of the Royalists desperate. Those brave and virtuous, but unfortunate adherents to the ancient constitution of their country, after the miserable slaughters which have been made in that body, after all their losses by emigration, are still numerous, but unable to exert themselves against the force of the usurpation, evidently countenanced and upheld by those very Princes who had called them to arm for the support of the legal Monarchy. Where then, after chasing these fleeting hopes of ours from point to point of the political horizon, are they at last really found? Not where, under Providence, the hopes of Englishmen used to be placed—in our own courage and in our own virtues, but in the moderation and virtue of the most atrocious monsters that have ever disgraced and plagued mankind. – Edmund Burke, Letters on a Regicide Peace

The prolife movement as a movement to provide protection under the laws of the United States for the unborn was a colossal failure. But was it a total failure? No, because some babies were saved by the efforts of prolifers. I feel the same way about Trump’s presidency. He has failed to stop white genocide and he has failed to stop legalized abortion, but his presidency has not been a total failure, because some white lives have been saved simply by his rhetoric about the illegals and by his restrictions on federally funded abortions. In addition, many private colleges and schools with a Christian ethos have temporarily avoided their inevitable shutdowns by the liberals as a result of Trump’s presidency. But both the prolife movement and Trump’s presidency were and are failures as movements, because they both were and are movements from within Liberaldom. To seek justice for whites and mercy for the unborn within the framework of democracy is, which oft our stage we have shown, to seek redemption from the devil.

In order to ensure Trump’s defeat in the upcoming presidential election, the liberals are deplatforming everyone even tangentially connected to ‘toxic whiteness.’ Some of those deplatformed are called ‘white supremacists,’ some are called ‘haters,’ and others are simply told they’ve been deplatformed because of a ‘technical glitch.’ I remember an old Andy Capp cartoon in which a neighbor woman comes to Andy’s door and asks to borrow his bottle opener. Andy tells her he can’t loan her his bottle opener because he’s using it to cut linoleum. The woman starts to walk away, stops, ponders a moment, and then turns back towards Andy’s back door. “You can’t cut linoleum with a bottle opener,” she shouts. Andy shouts back at her, “You can do anything you want with a bottle opener if you don’t want to loan it.” The liberals can and will deplatform for any reason they make up, but there is only one reason – they hate white people.

I understand why liberals are doing what they are doing: they are possessed by the devil. But I do not understand the ‘conservative’ whites. Every time one of them is deplatformed, he or she expresses outrage and surprise. Why are they outraged and surprised? Did they really expect fair play from the liberals? If they did, then they do not understand liberalism. They don’t see the obvious: liberalism is from the devil. And that is the problem with the resistance to liberalism: it is a non-resistance, because it is not a resistance rooted in the spirit and blood faith of our people. It does not go to the heart of the Christian fairy tale, hence it is powerless against liberalism.

The conservatives often give an intellectual nod to Christianity as a religion, but they look askance at you when you talk of Christ and the devil. Such talk hearkens back to the so-called Dark Ages (really the centuries of spiritual enlightenment) that are best left behind for a more intelligent, less intense type of Christianity that does not include talking snakes and personal encounters with the devil as depicted in the Gospels when our Lord confronts the devil in the wilderness.(1) Likewise the neo-pagans: they are too intelligent to be taken in by fairy tales. They will combat the liberals with their own version of intelligent liberalism, based on their fantasies of Viking pagans who never existed in reality and their superior brain cells too full of intelligence to believe as their white ancestors, whom they hold in contempt, believed.

The Christian fairy tale is either entirely true, from the Garden of Eden to Christ’s resurrection from the dead, or it is entirely false. If it is the truth, then we should act on that truth. We should not be surprised when the liberals do evil; we should expect them to do evil, because they are satanic. Once we have overcome that major hurdle, we will act according to the reality of the enemy before us. We will not fight democratically, because the democratic process is a train bound for hell with no stops on the way to the station.

What would happen if we listened, once again, to the lay of the European minstrels? What if we do not proceed according to the liberals’ ironclad rules of behavior? We don’t know what might happen, but look what happened in old Europe when white people responded to the lay of the greatest minstrel of them all, the Lord God, Jesus Christ. Old Europe came to life like some mystical wonderland from a storybook, because the European people took Christ into their hearts. And in order to take Christ into their hearts, they needed a racial hearth fire. Hearts of flesh do not come into being from the brain of a god as the goddess of wisdom, Athena, came to life when she sprang from the head of Zeus. No, hearts of flesh come into being in men and women with familial and racial hearth fires connected to Christ. White Europe, which was once a mystic realm of the spirit, is now a slaughterhouse with white carcasses hanging on the walls and white grazers standing in line just outside waiting to come in and be slaughtered. This is the world we live in. There is no way back through the satanic democratic process. But outside of that process there is someone greater than liberalism. His world is a world of miracles. We need to leave the liberals’ world and commit to fairy tale Europe with our whole heart, mind, and soul. Then? Miracles will occur in Europe once again.

The liberals came to power throughout the European world by constantly playing the liberal Anvil Chorus: “Science, science, science; Racism, racism, racism.” The din of that music, constantly repeated, drowned out the softer melody of the European minstrels. And over the course of time, that chorus entered the hearts of the European people. Like the wedding guest that “has been stunned and is of sense forlorn,” The European people became the unthinking, unfeeling tools of a satanic liberal hierarchy filled with hatred for Christ and the people who loved Him. The lay of the King of the European minstrels, our Savior, who sang of His house with many mansions and how He would be with us always, even when Science failed to sustain life in our bodies, was heard no more. There was only the liberals’ Anvil Chorus.

Trump should be supported by all white people, but he should be supported for what he is, a heroic rear-guard of a defeated army. And whites have been defeated because the liberals’ Anvil Chorus has beaten down the lay of the European minstrels. Men who heed the minstrel’s chorus of Christ crucified, Christ risen, do not need to live their lives in slavery to the democratic process that hammers out the Anvil Chorus of liberalism: “Science, science, science; Racism, racism, racism.”

The United States was the first white nation to adopt a government based on abstract principles rather than the traditional faith of the European people. France, a few years later, followed the American example. At first the French followed Robespierre’s model: “Jacobinism now!” Then, after Robespierre, they followed the American model, “Let us move incrementally toward the kingdom of God on earth.” During our Civil War, the first modern war in that the North disregarded the rules of chivalry because Utopians do no look upon themselves as original sinners, the Unitarians of the North shifted from incremental Jacobinism to Robespierre Jacobinism. They stayed with Robespierre Jacobinism from 1860 to 1874 when the Reconstruction Era was supposed to have ended. But did it end? No, it did not. The Southern people were still being reconstructed, just as the Northern people were being reconstructed, into a non-people without a racial hearth fire. It would have been better, spiritually, for the Southern people had the overt “Reconstruction” been made permanent, because under those repressive strictures the Southern people saw themselves as a white Christian people, separate and distinct from their Jacobin oppressors. Once they were mainstreamed, what became of the Southern people? Once we, the European people, were mainstreamed into Liberaldom, what became of us as a people?

The intellectual Christians throughout the Christian era of European history always denied they were living within a Christian culture. They denied that there could be a Christian culture. What those Christian Utopians, who always pointed to the sins of the European people, failed to grasp was that the European people, in the midst of their sins, held to a belief that Christ was the spiritual summit of human existence. All European societies were in agreement on that belief. And that belief, no matter what the Utopians say to the contrary, made the European people different from the non-European people.

The American and French revolutions were both spawned by men determined to be governed by a different spiritual ethos than the people of Christian Europe. We can now see clearly what that new ethos was; it was a very old ethos, the ethos of darkness. The liberals have decreed that we must all live in a pagan realm where nature is all. All wisdom, all truth, is to be found in the material realm. The liberals have discovered the beauty of the Noble Savage and the godlike perfection of an ever-evolving democratic system, which acts as a great reaping machine, destroying all things white and Christian, and protecting all things dark, bestial, and heathen.

We can’t change the fact that we live amongst liberals, but must we be of them? It is my contention that the European who is still connected to Christ through old Europe constitutes a spiritual force the liberals cannot deal with, because it is outside their frame of reference. They are used to white men who follow all the rules of liberalism. The integral Europeans, the men who set themselves apart from liberalism, are the Europeans who will bring Liberaldom down. Just as our Lord rejected the worldly temptations of Satan in the wilderness, so should all Christian Europeans set themselves apart spiritually from Satan’s world. We are Tell, standing athwart the mountain pass with an arrow for Gessler’s heart, and we are Guiderius and Arviragus, the sons of Cymbeline, standing alone against the Roman legions and refusing to yield, “Our Britain’s harts die flying, not our men.” Would that could be said of all of us, once again. The liberals are not invincible, they are not gods. But if we believe that their Anvil Chorus of “Science, science, science; Racism, racism, racism” is a greater chorus than “King of Kings and Lord of Lords,” we will surely perish. “Once more unto the breach!” +

(1) And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, Being forty days tempted of the devil. And in those days he did eat nothing: and when they were ended, he afterward hungered. And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread. And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God. And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence: For it is written, He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee: And in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone. And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God. And when the devil had ended all the temptation, he departed from him for a season. And Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit into Galilee: and there went out a fame of him through all the region round about. –Luke 4: 1-14
Posted in Democracy, Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Jacobinism, Religion of Satan | Tagged | Comments Off on Breaking Satan’s Rules