Why Do the Heathen Rage

Posted on April 6, 2013 by cwny

Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. – Psalm 2: 3

__________

It is not remarkable that black savages went on a rampage in the Miracle Mile district of downtown Chicago on Easter eve. Nor was it remarkable that the usual assortment of college professors and members of the press excused the rampage, while spewing their venom on any white man who dared criticize the black savages. Neither event, the rampage and the liberals’ defense of the rampage, was remarkable because bloody mayhem is the normal activity of blacks, just as the defense of bloody mayhem by blacks is the normal everyday activity of liberals. What would have been remarkable, astonishingly so, would have been a white counterattack against the black savages. If whites had demanded that the black savages who participated in the rampage be jailed and all other black savages sent back to Africa, then we would truly have seen and heard something remarkable.

Of course such a sane, Christian response to black crime will not be forthcoming because white people have contracted a brain fever which has spread to their blood. They no longer believe in the Gospel of Christ, they believe in the gospel of the negro. Instinctively after years of brainwashing the white man always assumes that whatever the black man does is good – or at least an excusable evil brought on by whites – and whatever the white man does is evil. White people always denigrate the white and deify the black without questioning why they do so. The liberals’ creed – black is good, white is evil – has been internalized by the white grazer so that in every instance he will take the side of the black against his own people. And whenever a conservative — at least one who is more conservative than his liberal cousin – wants to have an impact on his culture he tries to invoke the black gods of the liberals. “Abortion is bad because it harms black people.” “We should condemn welfare because it hurts the black family structure.” Everything is good or evil depending on how it affects blacks and the other colored races. And as a corollary everything is good if it hurts white people. Amnesty must be extended to illegal Aztecs because that will change the racial composition of the United States from white to colored. That is good. Why is it good that savage Aztecs should replace white people? It is self-evidently good, just as it was good and holy when black savages became the rulers of white South Africa. Did anyone from the West ask why it was good? Of course not: one does not question something as basic as the turning of the earth.

This new religion, which is an extension of Jacobinism, in which the negroes become “the people,” will not be voted away or altered by any type of democratic stratagem. Negro worship is a hard, bloodthirsty, heathen faith, and it is the blood of the white man that the liberals offer as sacrifice to their bloody negro gods.

The horrendous atrocities that were committed in the “religious” wars between various Christian sects were always committed by those men and women who were more committed to their abstract notion of God than to the living God. But there was always a counterbalance to the abstracted Christian atheists, because the European people worshipped a non-abstract, personal God named Jesus Christ. A Christian leaven kept the abstracted fanatics from turning Christendom into Satandom. What happens then when the spirit of abstraction predominates in a people who have lost or wavered in their faith in Christ? The satanic, abstracted minds of atheists rule the roost with all the zeal of the older Christian sectarian zealots, but without the counterbalance of a Christian people:

Thus is this character rounded off like that of the theologian who would become an inquisitor. Extraordinary contrasts meet in its formation—a lunatic that is logical, and a monster that pretends to have a conscience. Under the pressure of his faith and egotism, he has developed two deformities, one of the head and the other of the heart; his common sense is gone, and his moral sense is utterly perverted. In fixing his mind on abstract formulas, he is no longer able to see men as they are; through self-admiration he finally comes to viewing his adversaries, and even his rivals, as miscreants deserving of death. On this downhill road nothing stops him, for, in qualifying things inversely to their true meaning, he has violated within himself the precious conceptions which bring us back to truth and justice. No light reaches eyes which regard blindness as clear-sightedness; no remorse affects a soul which erects barbarism into patriotism, and which sanctions murder with duty. – The French Revolution

In my copy of Taine that last sentence is underlined. Our negro-worshipping liberals are a people whom no light reaches, whose hearts are never touched with remorse at destroying the white race, and they equate patriotism with the murder of white Christians. Are such a people fit to govern? Again, we must quote MacDuff: “Fit to govern! No, not to live.”

Robespierre was not deposed because the French Assembly repudiated Jacobinism any more than Khrushchev was deposed because the Russian government repudiated communism. Robespierre’s Jacobinism simply came into conflict with a more Catholic and cavalier Jacobinism (kill all opposition to the people, but at a slower rate). But at heart the French Republic remained Jacobin just as Europe became Jacobin. Burke was repudiated by his own party for his fierce opposition to the French Revolution, while every nation of Europe succumbed to its own version of the French Revolution. Liberty, equality, and fraternity for the people, and death to the aristocrats. But who are the people? They are the colored tribesmen. And who are the aristocrats? The Christ-bearing people, the whites.

In countries such as Haiti and South Africa, the whites have been and are being killed outright, and their deaths are presented to the whites in other countries as the result of racism. If you are not racist, you have nothing to worry about: “By flattering us, that we are not subject to the same vices and follies, it induces a confidence, that we shall not suffer the same evils by a contact with the infamous gang of robbers who have thus robbed and butchered our neighbors before our faces.” The white Eugene Terreblanches of South Africa are our neighbors. If we do not love them and hate their murderers we are as bad as the black fiends who murdered them.

In nations such as the United States, Britain, France, etc., nations which still have a sizeable white population, the colored minions of the liberals kill by miscegenation and one man, one vote. Miscegenation is worse than abortion — and abortion is a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance — because it results in the abortion of a whole line of white children while giving birth to a whole line of satanic offspring. And that great sin is maintained by one man, one vote. Why should the vote of a colored man, who hates and despises Christian Europe, count the same as the vote of a white man who loves and reveres Christian Europe? And why should a liberal who has announced, by his devotion to the negro, that he hates everything Christian and European, be allowed to have any say in the governance of a people who consecrated themselves to Christ? It’s blasphemy. And the fact that it is democratic blasphemy does not make it any less loathsome and foul than communist blasphemy.

I call a commonwealth Regicide, which lays it down as a fixed law of nature, and a fundamental right of man, that all government, not being a democracy, is an usurpation; that all Kings, as such, are usurpers; and for being Kings, may and ought to be put to death, with their wives, families, and adherents. The commonwealth which acts uniformly upon those principles, and which after abolishing every festival of religion, chooses the most flagrant act of a murderous Regicide treason for a feast of eternal commemoration, and which forces all her people to observe it.—This I call Regicide by establishment. – Letters on a Regicide Peace

Is this not exactly the system we have instituted? The royal race, the Christ-bearing race, are being exterminated, and every day we have our Earth Days, our Jackie Robinson days, and our Assisi I, II, and III, to commemorate godless heathenism and rejoice in the extermination of Christian Europeans and the demonization of their past. I call these abominations “Regicide by establishment.”

When I was young I had only heard the story of the Solomon who had asked God for wisdom rather than riches, and who solved the dispute between the two women, both claiming to be the mother of the one baby. It wasn’t till I was older that I read about the later years of this hideous blasphemer called Solomon. He did not use his God-given wisdom to serve the Lord, because he did not love the Lord in his heart. He loved the “strange” women of the pagans.

But King Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites: Of the nations concerning which the Lord said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you: for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods: Solomon clave unto these in love. – I Kings 11: 1-2

The Scriptures go on to contrast Solomon with his father, David: “And his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David his father.” Of David? His sins were scarlet, but he did not call his sins virtues and institutionalize them. He sought God’s forgiveness and continued to love God in his heart. Is not the crucial difference between Solomon and David the crucial difference between the modern liberal Europeans and the antique Europeans? The former have abandoned the true God, Jesus Christ, and replaced Him with the heathen gods of color. The latter group of Europeans were sinners, but they did not institutionalize sin. And they loved God in their hearts. All Europeans who still have hearts to love will cleave to ancient Europe, which was consecrated to Christ, and reject modern Europe, which is dedicated to the heathen gods of color whose rites are celebrated in the European churches and homes once consecrated to Christ.

The heathens rage in the streets of Chicago, London, Paris, and in streets throughout the European world because the European people have forsaken the faith of their fathers. The European people were, like David, the third dumb brothers found in the European fairy tales. Alone against a multitude of colored heathens they ventured forth and prevailed because they had that “charity of honor” which is bred in the bone of a people who love the Man of Sorrows with all their heart.

Our “conservative” leaders in church and state think we can convert the heathen by blending with them. That is the lie men who refuse to fight for their God tell people in order to cloak their apostasy. Solomon never formerly renounced the worship of the true God; he simply blended the worship of the God of Israel with the worship of the heathen gods. All the great evils that threaten – nay, seem to be permanent evils that Europeans must capitulate to, evils such as miscegenation, legalized abortion, Godless socialism and its cousin, Robber Baron capitalism – can and will be conquered when the Europeans become the third dumb brothers of Europe again. It is not our pygmy minds that God has need of, it is our hearts. We must follow David, St. Paul, Alfred, and Tell, not Solomon, Judas, Robespierre, and Mandela. In our blood are sacred memories of our people and our God. When those memories take hold of our soul there is no army on earth, no matter how large its numbers, that can stand against us. This has been proven time and time again in the history of the European people. The primary battle is an internal one. When the European stays with the European people and their God, refusing to blend with the heathen, he becomes the defender of Christendom, the scourge of Satandom, and the soul of honor. It is still possible: it is necessary. The heathens rage in European cities because Europeans no longer believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ. When they turn from their colored gods and call on Him by name, they will regain that charity of honor and they will reclaim their nations for Christ the King. +

Posted in Jacobinism, Negro worship, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Third Dumb Brother | Tagged , | Comments Off on Why Do the Heathen Rage

And the Dead Shall Be Raised Incorruptible

Posted on March 30, 2013 by cwny

“Death is swallowed up in victory.” – 1 Corinthians 15: 54

__________

I cannot think of Christmas without thinking of Dickens’ Christmas Carol. Nor can I think of Easter without thinking of Handel’s Messiah. It’s more than just an incidental thing to belong to a people who saw the face of Jesus Christ: it is a great blessing beyond compare. And yet we live in a time when a curse has been placed on the antique Europeans. At some point in time a great trial was held and the European people were found guilty of a heinous crime called ‘racism.’ As a result their ancient culture — as well as the people of that culture and their descendants — were sentenced to death. In passing that death sentence upon the European people, the liberals also killed the God who inspired the Europeans to proclaim, “And Death once dead, there’s no more dying then” (Shakespeare’s Sonnet 146). But of course that was the liberals’ intent, to kill God by destroying His image in His creatures. What started out as a small sect of liberals became a legion of men and women committed to the destruction of everything connected to Christian Europe.

The great tragedy for Europe and for the world occurred when European Christianity was perceived to be false because no self-respecting intelligent man could believe in the resurrection of the dead. The pride of reason, “Ye shall be as gods,” has always been the besetting sin of mortal man. The reasoning men, the scholars, the philosophers, the scientists, and the men of letters went to the devil first. They were too intelligent to believe in the resurrection from the dead. And the European peasants who did not want to be stupid followed the intellectuals’ lead. It’s not the proofs of God’s existence that are wanting: it’s the heart to believe that is wanting. We are not smarter than our European ancestors who believed in Christ’s resurrection from the dead. Show me a modern counterpart to Shakespeare, Burke, Michelangelo, or Hugo Grotius. Those men and so many others like them had great intellects, greater than any intellect of today, so why did they believe while the modern European does not believe? It has to do with the heart. Our European ancestors held to a faith that was passed on from heart to heart at their family hearth fires. The faith that is passed on by an organization committed to a theory of God is not the faith. It is an external faith only, an outward circumcision which “availeth nothing,” while that internal circumcision of the heart, which takes place when two or three are gathered together in His name, is everything. And where, but at our racial hearth fires where the heart is warmed and nurtured, can we learn to love and understand the God who cannot be understood intellectually but only known by a loving heart? A man’s faith in Christ as Redeemer and Savior cannot long endure once he steps outside his racial hearth fire, because in doing so he has embraced the universal mind of man, which leads to Satan, and rejected the heart that truly loves, which leads to Jesus Christ.

We are to God as Katharina the shrew was to Petruchio: before her conversion she saw life as a battle of reasoning wills and felt she must prevail even if it meant defiling her soul to do so. But after her conversion, she sees life through different eyes, through the eyes of the heart, and realizes that conformity to God’s beneficent will is all in all:

I am ashamed that women are so simple
To offer war where they should kneel for peace;
Or seek for rule, supremacy and sway,
When they are bound to serve, love and obey.
Why are our bodies soft and weak and smooth,
Unapt to toil and trouble in the world,
But that our soft conditions and our hearts
Should well agree with our external parts?
Come, come, you froward and unable worms!
My mind hath been as big as one of yours,
My heart as great, my reason haply more,
To bandy word for word and frown for frown;
But now I see our lances are but straws,
Our strength as weak, our weakness past compare,
That seeming to be most which we indeed least are.
Then vail your stomachs, for it is no boot,
And place your hands below your husband’s foot:
In token of which duty, if he please,
My hand is ready; may it do him ease.

‘Tis a battle we all must wage, this battle with our pride of reason. Lucifer refused to let go of his pride of reason and became Satan, the evil spirit whom liberals adore and Christians shun and hate. I think part of the reason the liberals have chosen the negro as their primary god is because the negro god does not challenge their pride of reason. The negro needs their intelligence to form the first person of the unholy trinity of reason, the negro, and science. Or so the liberal fantasizes. The negro sees a different reality, which does not include anything but the negro.

Easter really is the day of all days for the European. It is the celebration of their Savior’s resurrection from the dead, a Savior who can only be known by men and women who have not forsaken those mysterious human relationships that bind us to each other and to our Lord. Pride of reason can only be defeated by humble hearts that have learned to love at their racial hearth fires.

Let me close with a remarkable writer who is only known today for his unremarkable books, while his great Christian work has been completely forgotten. The author’s name is James Fenimore Cooper. Cooper was a Christian in ethos like all Europeans of his day, and that ethos was reflected in the manly adventure tales he wrote from age thirty through fifty-five. But in his mid-fifties Cooper saw the Redeemer who was the source of the European ethos. He saw the untamed Aslan, and he wrote about Him, free of the shackles of any one denomination and free of the “he was a good man but not the Son of God” heresy. Cooper’s hero in his masterpiece Sea Lions begins a journey to Antarctica full of the pride of reason, which keeps him from bending his knee to the Son of God. But by the end of the voyage the hero has come to a sympathetic understanding of the love that his intellect never could understand:

Roswell Gardiner has never wavered in his faith, from the time when his feelings were awakened by the just view of his own insignificance, as compared to the power of God! He then learned the first, great lesson in religious belief, that of humility; without which no man can be truly penitent, or truly a Christian. He no longer thought of measuring the Deity with his narrow faculties, or of setting up his blind conclusions, in the face of positive revelations. He saw that all must be accepted, or none; and there was too much evidence, too much inherent truth, a morality too divine, to allow a mind like his to reject the gospel altogether. With Mary at his side, he has continued to worship the Trinity, accepting its mysteries in an humble reliance on the words of inspired men.

Gardiner’s journey was Cooper’s journey: his European heart conquered his pride of reason. Christ will conquer our pride of reason as well if we turn to Him with humble hearts. Why, in the year of our Lord 2013, should we turn our backs on the God of our ascending race? “Christ is risen!” And the response of all true Europeans shall always be, “Indeed He has!” +

Posted in Antique Christianity, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Propositional faith | Tagged | Comments Off on And the Dead Shall Be Raised Incorruptible

The People of My House

Posted on March 23, 2013 by cwny

“A separation of the races is the only perfect preventive of amalgamation; but as immediate separation is impossible the next best thing is to keep them apart where they are not already together… Such separation, if it is ever to be effected at all, must be effected by colonization… The enterprise is a difficult one, but ‘where there is a will there is a way’, and what colonization needs most is a hearty will.” – Abraham Lincoln

__________

A few days ago I heard a radio preacher, a self-professed “biblical Christian,” expounding on the Lost Tribes of Israel. It was his decided opinion that the Saxons were one of the Lost Tribes of Israel, but having come to that conclusion, the preacher felt the need to issue a warning: “Be careful – believing this could lead a white person to become a white supremacist, which would be the worst sin.”

‘White supremacist’ is the phrase liberals and now conservatives as well use as a bomb to blow up any white person who says anything to suggest that white people and their culture should be protected or segregated from the colored races. The liberals and the jump-on-board conservatives are not very precise in their definition of ‘white supremacist’ because they don’t have to be. No one ever challenges them. Once the term ‘white supremacist’ is hurled at the offending white person, the white sinner is excommunicated and all who associate with him are also excommunicated. As one of those excommunicated white men, I would like to challenge the liberal-conservative coalition of self-serving, egotistical maniacs and defuse their ‘white supremacist’ bomb.

We know very well what images the liberal-conservatives are conjuring up, quite successfully, when they use the term ‘white supremacist.’ The average white person thinks of white plantation owners whipping their slaves, of Ku Klux Klan riders lynching innocent, defenseless negroes, of white baseball players trying to spike the good and pure Jackie Robinson, of white South Africans gunning down defenseless negroes for the pure joy of gunning down defenseless negroes, and of kindly black families being sent away hungry from white restaurants. All this and more the well trained white thinks of when the ‘white supremacist’ anathema is hurled at a white man. (1) How could white people have any other image of a white supremacist? Haven’t they been literally deluged with anti-white propaganda in movies, press, and literature for the past fifty years? The truth about ‘white supremacists’ is quite different from the liberals’ manufactured white bogeymen, but before we defend the ‘white supremacists’ let us clarify something: there are currently no white supremacists in the strict sense of the word, namely white men who want to rule over blacks. There are an infinitude of black supremacists, of Asian supremacists, and Mexican supremacists, but there are no white supremacists. The white man who still remains a white man does not seek supremacy, he seeks the preservation of his race because he loves his people and because he believes God has ordained that a man should stay by his own racial hearth fire.

A white segregationist is not a white supremacist. I do not want to rule over blacks, Asians, or Mexicans. I want blacks, Asians, and Mexicans to rule themselves respectively in Africa, Asia, and Mexico. My distant ancestors, who were white supremacists in the best sense of the word, wanted to rule over blacks in Africa, Asians in Asia, and Mexicans in Mexico, because they thought blacks, Asians, and Mexicans were better off when whites ruled them. They were right, but such altruism – yes, I said altruism – has been too costly for whites. The colored would not be converted, and when white resolve weakened because of liberal insurgency from within the white strongholds, the colored people sought revenge on the whites for taking them out of bondage, away from their beloved Egyptian night. Better to let them have their Babylon and keep white countries white. But of course the liberals’ will not allow that. It is not only the colored countries that must be colored, it is also the white countries that must be colored. I know the liberals’ passion to colorize European nations is called diversity, but we know it by its proper name: genocide.

Because of the liberals’ passionate hatred of their own people, they refuse to allow whites to segregate themselves from colored people. They want whites to diversify themselves into extinction. For this reason the white segregationist has to be a white supremacist, so long as the colored tribesmen are in his nation. He has no choice. When whites rule other races, those other races prosper, but when the colored races rule white people are always fighting murderous barbarian hordes who want to kill every last white. Haiti was not an aberration: it was and always shall be the model for colored people. The colored people have a barbarian’s pride of race, which gives them an insatiable desire to conquer other races, but they do not love their own race as whites did when they were Christian. The love of one’s own race fosters a respect for other races, while a pride of race fosters a hatred for other races. This is why a diverse state (obviously not as desirable as a non-diverse state) must be a white-dominated state for the good of all. If whites rule, everyone is better off, but if coloreds rule everyone suffers particularly the whites. Pushed to the brink of the cliff whites must conquer or be driven off the cliff onto the jagged rocks of diversity below.

We live in the moral vacuum Yeats saw coming: “The best lack all conviction and the worst are full of passionate intensity,” because the colored peoples have never raised themselves above the level of racial pride, and the white liberals, who hate their own race, have descended to the depths of hell and left the grazers in limbo. The liberal, being post-Christian, mixes a secularized Christianity with paganism. He has the pagan’s pride of race, but he is proud of the colored races. By an intellectual metamorphosis the liberal has become one with the colored races in his own mind. I can still see, in my mind’s eye, the poster on the door of a young, blue-eyed, blonde student who roomed across the hall from me in my freshmen year at college. The poster showed a black man killing a white man. The caption on the edifying picture was a rallying cry for blacks to rise up and slay their oppressors. Did the white student think he would be slain? Of course not. He was not an oppressor. In his mind’s eye he was Atticus Finch, a white man with a black heart who would lead his people against the white oppressors. Kipling tells us that Gunga Din, because of his intense identification with and sympathy for the British soldier, “was white, clear white inside.” The Chris Matthews’ liberal is the exact opposite: despite his outward color he is black, pure black inside. And the former metamorphosis is what God intended: that the colored should be transformed by a sympathetic imitation of the white, while the latter metamorphosis is what Satan intended when he whispered “noble savage” and “Ye shall be as gods” into the white man’s ear.

Denying that they are repudiating Christ by joining the liberals, the conservative church men, such as that radio preacher, tell us they simply love their neighbor as themselves when they embrace diversity. There are two glaring errors in the treacherous church men’s assertion. First, loving your neighbor as yourself implies that you love yourself and your own people. You are not to hate your own in order to love the stranger. And secondly, is negro worship even remotely connected to love? What the liberals, and now the Christian churches as well, have done with the negro and the other races of color is what Hugh Hefner did with women in Playboy. They have made a god of the generic black man as Hefner made a god of the generic naked woman. Is such a generic love even remotely connected to the love of one’s neighbor that Christ talks about? No, it is not. Love of our neighbor implies the love of our own, those who are close to us. It is extremely difficult to love because human beings are small of heart and selfish. That is why God gave us a particular people to dwell with, which constitutes our best chance of stepping outside of ourselves, maybe for just a moment, and truly loving our neighbor as ourselves. The type of love the New Age clergymen recommend is a purely selfish love. Their ‘neighbor’ is a mind-forged abstraction who exists only to gratify their selfish need to worship a pagan god of nature, who prefers sacrifice to mercy.

I don’t know whether the radio minister was right about the Saxons being a Lost Tribe of Israel. I wouldn’t thump my chest in pride if it was proved to be true or be crestfallen if it was proved to be false. That the European people are the Christ-bearing people seems evident to me because of something independent of biblical or archeological research. I see Christ in the antique European culture, and I do not see Christ in the anti-cultures of the colored people. What is taking place in the conservative Christian churches (it has already taken place in the mainstream churches) is not a new ‘love thy neighbor’ policy, in which previously unwelcome people of color are welcomed into the Christian fold. It is a transformation of European Christianity, the true Pauline Christianity, into a pagan, nature religion with the negro as the centerpiece. In this movement toward the pagan abyss the conservative churches are merely following the lead of the secular conservatives and liberals. They are united in their heathenism because they are united in their hatred of the European and their love of the negro.

In his novel Uncle Silas LeFanu tells us that, “The devil approached the citadel of his heart by stealth, with many zigzags and parallels.” I think that is how he approaches most human beings. There are very few Richard the III’s who completely and wholeheartedly embrace the devil. Today’s churchmen are like Uncle Silas: their hearts have dried up because they left their racial hearth fire in order to go whoring after colored gods of their own making. Such gods cannot provide them with the warmth or the love they once had at their own racial hearth fire. They have become a pathetic sideshow in the great Babylonian pageant of darkness. The task of the antique European, living in this modern Babylon, is to reject the outright blasphemy of the liberals and the more subtle blasphemy of the conservatives. Like a rattlesnake both the conservatives and the liberals reveal their deadly intent: the rattlesnake with his rattle and the liberals and their conservative partners with their ‘white supremacist’ bomb. We should resist both forms of reptilian onslaughts. The liberal-conservative Christ haters are no more “of us” than the rattlesnake.

And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. +

__________________________________

(1) Instead of “white supremacists” I think we might more accurately describe those men of old Europe who endeavored to help the colored races as white saints. In Africa, in India, and in the American South, wherever the white man went the colored tribesmen were exposed to — and benefited by the exposure to — a culture that put mercy above sacrifice. Anthony Jacob’s description of the old South accurately describes the white man’s charitable outreach in India and Africa as well:

“With regard to the supposed ill-treatment of the Negro slaves in the South, this was of course a myth. Far from suffering terrible hardships and miseries, they were at least as well off as the contemporary European peasant, and often in better circumstances than many ‘poor white’ Southerners. Foreign visitors were astonished – not merely surprised – to find how well fed and well cared for they were. The foreign visitors had fully expected to find the Negroes being flogged to death or hung in chains, and were disappointed to find they were not. It is true that whippings with a strap did sometimes take place, as many Negroes would only labour out of fear of the lash. But it was almost invariably a comparatively mild punishment and only administered as a last resort. Whipping was universal a century ago; and what the Negro slaves suffered in this respect was laughable compared with what British seamen or even Eton schoolboys suffered.”

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Europeans and Christ, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Quality of mercy | Comments Off on The People of My House

Eternal Constancy

Posted on March 16, 2013 by cwny

So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. – Revelations 3: 16

__________

The old debate: whether it was American decadence that corrupted Europe or European decadence that corrupted America was settled when The Obama was elected President of the United States. When a nation that still has a majority of white people in it elects a glorified ape to preside over them, they are truly the most decadent of the decadent. But European conservatives have no cause to thump their chests in triumph nor do European liberals have any cause to lament their second place showing. The United States has descended to the deepest region of hell, but the Europeans are only one circle of hell above the Americans. So whether one set of Europeans is deeper in hell than another is kind of a moot point, considering they all are in hell.

Tennyson laments after the death of a loved one that his tongue cannot adequately convey his sorrow. He then proceeds to convey his sorrow quite well. But I don’t think Tennyson’s lament about his inability to express himself was affectation. When the heart truly loves all words are inadequate to express one’s feeling of sadness when the beloved has died. We see through a glass darkly, and we speak and write in the face of that same dark glass.

The death of Christian Europe is like unto the death of a loved one. Its death makes us feel as Tennyson felt:

But O for the touch of a vanished hand
And the sound of a voice that is still!

But if we can still remember and lament, the loved one is not dead, the beloved sentry is still there, and He will sustain our honored dead. The task of the living is to keep faith with the dead.

The Europeans of the latter half of the 20th century severed all ties to our honored dead in order to be part of a multi-racial, multi-faith, multi-sexual utopia. And looking back we can see quite clearly how Christian Europe became Satandom.

The creation of Satandom did not begin with the French Revolution, but that event did show us the first incarnation of Satan within the heart of Europe. So it behooves us to take a look at the various forces arrayed against each other in that Revolution, because they are the forces that exist today and always shall exist in every revolution.

There were three forces present in the French Revolution. We begin with the forces of evil. Burke, the metaphysician and poet, captured the essence of Jacobinism in his writings while Taine, writing 80 years later than Burke, gave us a detailed account of the sins of the Jacobins. Let us go to Burke for a crystal clear summation of the essence of Jacobinism:

The rebels to God perfectly abhor the Author of their being. They hate him “With all their heart, with all their mind, with all their soul, and with all their strength.” He never presents himself to their thoughts but to menace and alarm them.  They cannot strike the Sun out of Heaven, but they are able to raise a smouldering smoke that obscures him from their own eyes. Not being able to revenge themselves on God, they have a delight in vicariously defacing, degrading, torturing, and tearing in pieces his image in man.

And to Taine for an insight into the bloody nature of the new religion of philanthropy:

All means are justifiable and meritorious with traitors; now that the Jacobin has made his slaughtering canonical, he slays through philanthropy.

Nothing has changed since those wonderfully madcap days (according to the liberals) of the French Revolution. All whites have become the traitors who must be eliminated, and the people of color have become “the people,” but the revolution goes on as Satan desires. So long as the Europeans are demonized and the negro, the conduit to Satan, is deified, the forces of hell will rule in what was once Christendom.

And what of the forces of good? Were there no good men left in France to defend the King, his Queen, and eternal France? No, there were not. There were no good men in the highest sense of the word. There was no one who could see evil for what it was and then fight to defend the good.

It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then the dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began to move in,–glittering like the morning-star, full of life, and splendor, and joy. Oh! What a revolution! And what a heart must I have to contemplate without emotion that elevation and that fall! Little did I dream when she added titles of veneration to those of enthusiastic, distant, respectful love, that she could ever be obliged to carry the sharp antidote against disgrace concealed in that bosom; little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fallen upon her in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honour, and of cavaliers. I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone.

In Britain the situation was much the same as it was in France. There were many reasonable, moderate men (we shall come to them later) who deplored the excesses of the French Revolution, but they could not see, because their hearts had grown tepid, that Jacobinism was an intrinsically evil, satanic attack on Christian Europe. All they saw were political reformers who had gone overboard. “It couldn’t happen here, you know, we just don’t do things that way.” Only Burke saw the Revolution for what it was and spent what remained of his life trying to battle the ignorance in the hearts of his countrymen:

Viewing things in this light, I have frequently sunk into a degree of despondency and dejection hardly to be described: yet out of the profoundest depths of this despair, an impulse which I have in vain endeavoured to resist has urged me to raise one feeble cry against this unfortunate coalition which is formed at home, in order to make a coalition with France, subversive of the whole ancient order of the world. No disaster of war, no calamity of season, could ever strike me with half the horror which I felt from what is introduced to us by this junction of parties, under the soothing name of peace. We are apt to speak of a low and pusillanimous spirit as the ordinary cause by which dubious wars terminate in humiliating treaties. It is here the direct contrary. I am perfectly astonished at the boldness of character, at the intrepidity of mind, the firmness of nerve, in those who are able with deliberation to face the perils of Jacobin fraternity.

Jacobinism was never checked. Once the French disposed of the manically philanthropic Robespierre, they and their satanic creed were allowed a place in the fraternity of European nations. As recently as 2009, the former French President Nicolas Sarkozy said proudly that France was a regicide nation. And why should that raise the ire of anyone but me? At present aren’t all the nations of Europe regicide nations? Now if Sarkozy had said, “We are a Christian nation, we will not be overrun by Moslems and negroes,” then all the people of European descent would have risen up and denounced France as a pariah nation that must be eradicated from the face of the earth. And we know who would be leading the chorus for the destruction of Christian France: the Christian clergymen of all the European nations. Despite the fact that the Jacobins tortured and murdered the clergymen who refused to take the oath of obedience to the Jacobins, despite the fact that the Jacobins institutionalized atheism, the great bulk of our modern clergymen would condemn any resurgence of Christianity in France and would support, to the death, atheist, Jacobin France. They would do so because they are Christian atheists just as Dostoyevsky’s Grand Inquisitor was a Christian atheist. It is better, in their minds, that millions should die and Christ should be supplanted in the hearts of men than they should give up their systems. It is the sin of Caiaphas! To his dying day the great “conservative” Hilaire Belloc supported the French Revolution, because the French monarchy did not live up to his system. And the moderate men with one voice declared Burke’s “metaphysical meanderings” to be “obsessive” and unwarranted. “After all, they were only political reformers who went a bit wrong.” Which brings us to the men without whom no Revolution can succeed or be sustained.

We have come to the third force, the moderate, reasonable men, who really are only a force because their lack of moral strength allows the forces of evil to triumph. Reasonable, moderate men are perfectly good citizens when passionate men with hearts of fire keep the forces of evil at bay. But when the ranks of the good men with hearts of fire diminish and the ranks of the Christ-hating liberals swell, it becomes necessary for the reasonable, moderate men to step into the breach and cry halt to the evil. They never do. Because of some inborn or acquired lukewarmness of heart, the reasonable, moderate men always misread the revolutionaries’ intent, and they betray their own people as they cite platitudes about moderation and reason. In France during the Revolution the moderate, reasonable men sat on their hands and watched “political reformers” kill their King.

So long as the moderate, reasonable men are few in number a nation is safe. In the South Africa of the 1840s, for instance, when only a few of the white settlers supported lifting the ban on apartheid, the few reasonable, moderate men did no damage: “The negroes are not animals, you know. I think we can interact with them without any fear of them molesting our daughters or killing us in our beds.” But when the moderate, reasonable men with the tepid hearts become a majority, as they did in South Africa, the people perish because the evil liberals and their colored allies overrun the good and noble whites and turn Christian nations into hellish nations consecrated to Satan. In France before the Revolution, in Haiti before the bloodletting, in Russia before the Revolution, in South Africa before one-man-one-vote, and in the modern white nations before multi-racialism became the law of the land, it was always the moderate, rational men who paved the way for the massacre of the white race by their reasonable, moderate responses to evil. It is always the extremists who are condemned by the moderate, rational men, and it is always the extremists who are right. Burke was called obsessive and extremist when he said Jacobinism unchecked would lead to a Jacobin Europe, which would devour Christian Europe. He was right. Dostoevsky was considered too extreme when he said that should the Bolsheviks obtain power they would slaughter millions of innocent people. He also was right, while the moderate, rational men were wrong. And Anthony Jacob was right when he said that multi-racial conservatism was an impossibility because it was an offense against God. Why are the moderate, rational men always wrong? They are wrong about human events because they are wrong about God. They are afraid of a passionate God, so they put Him in their little geometrically perfect box from which He is only supposed to come forth when the moderate, rational men want Him to come forth. But God is fire, passion, and desire. He can’t be contained in a rational box. In the Chronicles of Narnia C. S. Lewis tells us that Aslan is not a tame lion. No indeed, he is not.

The modern, white-hating Satanists, and the colored tribesmen did not conquer the whites in Rhodesia, South Africa, and the European nations because of their superior numbers. They conquered because the Europeans exchanged their faith in the untamed, passionate Christ of their forefathers for a moderate, rational, civil-rights-worker-type of God: “So long as there is diversity, which is the whole sum and substance of my divine message, I’m happy.” That is the reasonable, regular guy God of the moderate, reasonable Europeans. So long as that false craven image of God keeps them from seeing the true God, the Europeans will serve the negro gods and by doing so will serve Satan.

In this century and the past century when we refer to the rational, moderate men, we are talking about the conservatives. They treat all mankind as generic units sharing the same values as they do. When things go wrong, as they did in the last Presidential election in this country, the conservatives do not question their universalist principles and say, “Maybe all races are not alike, maybe the European people are different from the people of color.” No, instead they start thinking about “winning over the blacks” or “appealing to the educated Hispanics.” And on and on go the good, solid, well-meaning, intelligent conservatives. They will still be blathering when the stew pot is closed over their heads. If you avoid the race issue, if you don’t fight for God, for England, and St. George, you might avoid conflict in the short run, but in the long run you will perish because by denouncing your race you have denounced your soul. I believe our Lord summed up the tragedy of the moderate, rational men: “He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.” You can’t step outside the realm of the spirit, which is what a man does when he forsakes His people for generic mankind, and still hold on to a place in this world or the world to come.

A friend, who knows how I feel about whites and negro worship, asked me if I was delighted that the new Pope was white. Leaving aside the whole ‘whore of Babylon’ argument, I told my friend that I felt as I would have felt had Romney won the Presidential election: glad to see a white man in office rather than a black man, but aware that the problem of negro worship still remains the same. Practical, reasonable men such as the conservatives — religious and secular — still believe in a generic system with the negro at the center rather than a particular God who comes to us through our racial hearth fires.

I have in my possession a story book that my grandfather gave to my mother when she was a little girl. When my mother died, I was given the storybook. In the book is the story of Roland. If you remember, Roland was killed fighting a heroic battle against the Saracens when he and his followers acted as a rearguard for Charlemagne. The Saracens were able to ambush Roland because Roland’s stepfather, Ganelon, had betrayed him. The story concludes with these words:

Scarcely had Roland breathed his lasts when Charlemagne arrived to find of all his twenty thousand not one left. Mournfully he called his peers by name. Not one there was to answer, not a single one. And on the height, his face toward Spain, they found the hero Roland. Great was the grief of all. Great was the grief of Charlemagne. His host pursued the Saracens and by the river E’bro, the Moors paid to the full the penalty of their treachery. Then bearing the bodies of Roland and Oliver, Charlemagne returned to France. Laden with chains and tied to a stake like a wild beast Ganelon was led before his judges for trial. By his dark deed lay twenty thousand dead. He was condemned and suffered a shameful death. But in the hearts of Charlemagne and all the people of France remained undying love for Roland, for he took his stand, and held it, never yielding, unto death.”

Undying love? No, the people of France are regicides now: it is Ganelon who is honored in France, Gessler in Switzerland, Mordred in Britain… We do not honor our dead, we demonize them for being provincial, Christian, and racist. This Babylonian world, ruled by Ganelons and colored tribesmen, was ushered in by moderate, reasonable men who, having lost their connection to their own people, lost their connection to the living God, Jesus Christ, the only one who gives Europeans the heart and the passion to take arms against and defeat Satan and his minions. +

Posted in Europeans and Christ, Jacobinism, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Eternal Constancy

One People, One Lord

Posted on March 9, 2013 by cwny

“Iron out of Calvary is master of men all!” – Rudyard Kipling

__________

The liberals’ cauldron of racial diversity, sexual diversity, and religious diversity that had been brewing for most of the 20th century finally boiled over in the mid-1960s. What was implicit in the post World War I generations became explicit in the mid-1960s: “We, the European people, believe in science, not Christ.” Is it that simple? Of course not. Many Europeans (in fact most) tried to blend Christianity and science. But in the end science won out. Even those who denounced materialism and technology like the Sixties’ hippies needed their drugs, their birth control pills, and their abortions in order to live “naturally.”

By the mid-1960s the scientized Europeans became like the secularized Jews. They fed off the older Christian culture that spiritually sustained them while doing everything in their power to destroy that culture. Science, like Judaism, cannot sustain a people, because both secularized faiths lack a Messiah. This longing for a Messiah, a longing that can only be realized in Christian Europe, resulted in a dichotomy in the European liberal and their spiritual counterparts, the secularized Jews. They rejected the Light of the World while longing for some substitute for the Light of the World – a friend who was almost supernatural in his devotion and kindness:

When you’re down and out
When you’re on the street
When evening falls so hard
I will comfort you.

I’ll take your part
When darkness comes
And pain is all around
Like a bridge over troubled water
I will lay me down

Henry Francis Lyte, a man from that other European world, said that the friend who abides with us in all our troubles is Christ:

Abide with me; fast falls the eventide;
The darkness deepens; Lord with me abide!
When other helpers fail and comforts flee,
Help of the helpless, O abide with me!

Joseph Scriven, writing in 1857, concurred with Lyte: “What a Friend we have in Jesus, all our sins and griefs to bear!”

Is it a progression to reject Christ for a mythical friend in the future, a kind of sensitized Übermensch, who will be our bridge over the troubled waters of existence? “Yes, it is a progression,” the liberals tell us. “It is a progression because sensitive Übermensches are real while Christ is a fiction.” We are always faced with Dostoyevsky’s question: “Can an intelligent man, a European, believe in the divinity of Christ?” The liberals and the intellectualized European peasants have all said no to that question in the 20th century, and as a result they worship negroes in the 21st century.

Science was a cold, indifferent God to the Europeans. Like Rumpelstiltskin, they needed something human in their lives. So they went looking for a suffering servant and came up with the negro. He became the true man, the man of nature, who, when blended with science could be the savior the Europeans had lost when they rejected Christ. Negro worship will intensify so long as the “intelligent” Europeans reject Christ. The Christian churchmen who are currently trying to fuse negro worship with Christianity will end up as high priests in the cult of the negro. It has always been thus. Christ will not be blended. He is “Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.” If you reject Him as Lord, He will not be content to serve as an auxiliary god in a new church in which the negro is the primary god.

It’s rather ironic that now, when the Europeans have more empirically verifiable proof that Christ existed and His tomb was indeed empty than they ever had before, that they no longer believe in Christ’s resurrection from the dead. One wonders if they had the ultimate proof before their eyes and could see and touch the risen Lord, as the doubting Thomas did, if they would believe. Once a man is convinced that truth can only be found in the science lab under a microscope he will be blind to the truth staring him in the face.

Everything of importance in our life depends on our vision. If we see life feelingly with our hearts, we will not seek God in nature but in the recesses of the human heart. In Chateaubriand’s magnificent commentary on the sin of Adam and Eve, he said their sin would not have been as egregious if they had wanted to love too much. But instead they wanted to know too much, which made their sin much greater, because they deliberately cut themselves off from the organ of sight, the human heart. So it was with the Hebrew people when they displeased God. They gave themselves to the forces of nature, glorifying the physical universe rather than the God who imparts to human hearts. And likewise the scholastics’ revolt – if God can be found ‘out there’ in nature by the human mind, then the human mind that contemplates nature becomes God. Though each would repudiate the other, the Thomist and the stardust-and-golden hippie have the same tragically flawed theology. And it’s flawed because it leads to the witch’s cauldron of diversity instead of the hearth fires of the antique Europeans where Christ dwells.

The new faith in the negro has become institutionalized, but as is so often the case when a religion becomes institutionalized on a large scale it no longer arouses the same passion it did in its early stages. The sixties’ liberals such as Chris Matthews are still passionate about the negro gods, but younger Europeans take their religion for granted, just as a 18th century nobleman might perform his religious duties because it’s the accepted thing to do along with fox hunts and entertaining large numbers of friends and political allies. The young Europeans accept the divine status of the negro, occasionally telling an irreverent joke about him, and go on with their wretched lives, unaware there is any sin other than racism, any culture other than Babylon, and any God other than the negro. The darkness deepens for the European people – they need a living God who will abide with them.

I can’t get past that nine-year-old English boy who committed suicide after being tormented by Asian spawns of Satan. The boy was a victim of what the liberals call diversity, which is the code name for the hatred of the white race and the worship of the colored races. Our children are being taught to hate themselves and to expect a life of torture at the hands of the savage races of color. And a false universalism in the Christian churches is responsible for the suicide of the white race: because the church men have called the love of one’s kith and kin, the only type of love that can connect us to Him, racist and heinous. Without their racial backbone the European people are without a soul:

There is nothing remotely noble about multiracialism as the Press would have it [ed. I would add “as the clergy would have it” as well]. On the contrary, it is loathsome and sinister. It is not Godly but Devilish: an offense against the Creator. To espouse it means that one despises one’s own race, one’s own wife and children, and their children in turn. This means that one cannot venerate or respect anything at all. To espouse multiracialism is not evidence of love, but of the very opposite of it.  -Anthony Jacob

That is the crux of the matter. Diversity is based on the hatred of one’s own people, one’s own parents, wife, children, and grandchildren. A cousin of mine, on a recent visit, was waxing nostalgic about her parents, her grandparents, and the love that once was there when they were alive. She talked sadly of her nephew who had married outside his own race and wondered what was happening to the world. But then she tried to be a good American: “Oh well, I guess it’s all for the best, we have to adjust to progress.”

“Why must we adjust?” I asked her. “I have no intention of adjusting.”

Why should we adjust to Satandom? Shouldn’t real Europeans defy the devil and all his works? Diversity is just as Jacob described it: loathsome, sinister, and devilish. Instead of adjusting to it, we should oppose it with our whole heart and soul. But that is the conundrum: a man who has been singed with the fire from the cauldron of diversity does not have the heart or the soul to oppose diversity. “Breathes there a man with soul so dead…?” Unfortunately the modern displaced European is such a man. But things of the spirit are not subject to the strict biological laws of decay and death. In the realm of the spirit, that which is dead can come to life again. The liberals are Satan’s own, but the grazers are Satanists by assignment. They do what the liberals, particularly the liberal clergymen, tell them. Suppose a European with an ancient heart, a heart of flesh, came into Liberaldom and stood against the liberals and the barbarians of color, armed only with a faith in his people and their God? If the “fairy tales” of the Bible and the European people are true, the hero will prevail against the forces of hell. The essential thing in all fairy tales is that the hero must be pure of heart, and he must be willing to venture forth against mathematically impossible odds. I could cite the impossible military battles won by the Europeans of old, but let me cite the greatest battle they won. They turned Babylon into Christendom, because they loved their people so much they saw “His blood upon the rose.”

The greatest danger to the white race is not those enemies who come at us with swords in their hands. They must be resisted, but there is a far more subtle enemy than the violent savages of color. The most dangerous enemies are the conservatives and the liberals who urge the white man to survive by being absorbed into the races of color. Better to go down fighting to the last man, as Europeans with European souls, then to survive by becoming part of Babylon. A base, dishonorable survival in this world will lead to eternal damnation in the next. The refusal to become diverse is the best way to win against the forces of evil in this world and the only way to secure a place for ourselves in His Kingdom come. +

Posted in Democracy, Liberalism, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on One People, One Lord

The Greatest of These

Posted on March 2, 2013 by cwny

Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. 1 Corinthians 13: 8

__________

Last week an English boy, about 9 years old, committed suicide after being bullied and tormented by some subhuman Asians. And last week I finished reading The Pickwick Papers with my children. Though seemingly unrelated, those two events – both of which shook me to the core of my soul – were very much related.

I’ve read Pickwick Papers more times than I can count, but this reading was different from all my other readings of the novel. I found myself near tears at comic sections of the book that used to elicit laughter. And there was something else inside of me beside sorrow: there was anger. If I was to put a name to the sorrow and the anger I would call it, “That which is lost.” Pickwickian England is Christian Europe. Without closing his eyes to any of its evils, Dickens shows us the love that once was there in a people who took the Lord Jesus Christ into their hearts. The antique Europeans did not differ from other peoples because they did no evil. They differed from all other peoples because they, and they alone, had charity. And when in the presence of such people, a feeling of awe comes over me, because in their charity I see the face of Jesus Christ. Hence the sorrow and the anger. Sorrow at the incomparable world that has been lost and anger at those who destroyed it.

I felt the same sorrow and anger when I read about the suicide of that poor nine-year-old boy. His death was the direct result of the liberals’ destruction of Pickwickian Europe. I know what the defenders of Liberaldom will say: “There was bullying in the schools in your precious Christian Europe. Just look at those atrocious English public schools for instance.” Yes, let’s look at them. Thomas Hughes, in his book Tom Brown’s School Days, gives us an excellent description of bullying and its effect on small school children. But he doesn’t recommend utopian measures to counteract bullying. In Hughes’ opinion there will always be cruel boys who prey on the weaker helpless boys, just as there will always be cruel men who prey on the weak and the helpless. The only realistic counter to bullying is the Christian hero. Tom Brown is liberated from the cruel tyranny of Flashman by the intervention of an upperclassman who has been imbued with the proper bred-in-the-bone Christianity. Some things, such as the cruelties that Flashman inflicts on Tom Brown, are simply not to be tolerated. And Tom, when he becomes an upperclassman, protects the weak and helpless Arthur just as Brooke once helped him.

The English boarding school of Tom Brown’s School Days is a mirror image of the world. Utopian schemes hatched by atheist Jacobins only lead to greater evils than any of the evils the utopians claim they are eradicating. Hughes and Burke are of one mind about societies and institutions that seek to run their little worlds without the Savior who redeemed the world.

“The unbought grace of life, the cheap defence of nations, the nurse of manly sentiment and heroic enterprise, is gone! It is gone, that sensibility of principle, that charity of honor, which felt a stain like a wound, which inspired courage whilst it mitigated ferocity, which enobled whatever it touched, and under which vice itself lost half its evil, by losing all its grossness.”

The charity of honor that pervaded Christian Europe did not eradicate evil from the face of the earth. What happened was what Burke and Hughes described: savage ferocity was mitigated and vice lost half its evil because there was a Christian counter-response to every evil that men did. Now, when there is no Christian European counter-response to evil we see unmitigated savage ferocity and vice triumphant. The mother of that tormented nine-year-old child had pleaded to the school administrators to help her son, but her pleas fell on deaf ears because liberals have no conscience: they belong to Satan. Had a black mother protested that white boys were bullying her son, the white boys would have been summarily executed without a trial. Had the Asian filth who tormented the English boy accused a group of white boys of the same crime they were guilty of, the white boys would have been driven off the face of the earth.

This world of unmitigated evil in which colored savages torment and murder white people with the approval of the liberal oligarchy will continue to flourish so long as white Europeans are separated from the type of honor that is connected to charity. It always saddens me when I see small remnant bands of white youth trying to organize a white resurgence under the banner of a pagan intellectual such as Nietzsche. There is no charity in such undertakings, hence there is no enduring fire in the heart. The reason charity never faileth is because that charity of honor connects us to Christ, and without Him all causes, no matter how brilliantly conceived, are doomed to live for one brief moment and then die, just as we are doomed to live for one brief moment and die unless our Redeemer, out of divine charity, steps between us and death, granting us eternal life.

Unmitigated cruelty will cease when the European becomes what he was meant to be: the man with a heart of flesh. Throughout the scriptures, God makes it clear that He judges men by what is in their hearts.

“And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh: That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God. But as for them whose heart walketh after the heart of their detestable things and their abominations, I will recompense their way upon their own heads, saith the Lord God.”

Undergirding the liberals’ kingdom of detestable things and abominations is a heinous Orientalism that is the complete antithesis of European Christianity. The reason the Orientals have shown such a relish and genius for cruelty is because they have rejected the Christian belief in the resurrection of the dead. If Christ be not risen, then all of life in the flesh is pain. One must develop a stony heart and a detached mind in order to endure the pain of existence. And such a philosophy is very effective. A man with a heart of stone and a mind detached from humanity can endure a lot of pain, especially the pain he inflicts on other people.

Because their people were once Christian, the syncretistic liberals of the West have added an abstract black Messiah to their Orientalism, but this new utopia that the liberals are building is based on a very old Orientalism. Kipling tells us that East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet, but the liberals have joined the two and made hell on earth.

The fusion of Eastern philosophies that foster an indifference to the pain of others with a secularized Christianity has made the formerly Christian European countries into a satanic union of nations with one purpose: to destroy every and any remnant of the light of the world. Fusing Christian zeal with Oriental cruelty, the liberals seek out blasphemers. They are indifferent to the sufferings they inflict on white people, because white people are connected, through their past, to the light. And they agonize about the plight of the colored, not because they care about individual human beings, but because they care about blasphemy. The liberals’ gods are colored people in the abstract: they must not be offended.

A few years ago I read a neo-pagan’s attempt to defend the European people while denouncing Christianity. This is a difficult task because the European people, as a people, were historically wedded to Christ. If Christ was not the Son of God, then the Europeans should be despised for perpetuating a falsehood of monumental proportions on the world. But let me present the neo-pagan’s solution to that dilemma: he claimed that Christianity was originally a universalist, multi-racial religion, a mere extension of the universalism of the Roman Empire. Then came the Goths, the Europeans. They made a universalist religion into a provincial religion, a religion in which the Son of God spoke to His people who had hearts of flesh. The secular historian G. M. Trevelyan concurs with the neo-pagan apologist:

The Nordic religion was not a religion of dread, or of magic formularies to propitiate hostile powers. Instead of covering its temples with frescoes of the tortures of the damned, it taught people not to be afraid of death. Its ideal was the fellowship of the hero with the gods, not merely to feasting and victory, but in danger and defeat. For the gods, too, are in the hands of fate, and the Scandinavian vision of the twilight of the gods that was to end the world showed the heroes dying valiantly in the last hopeless fight against the forces of chaos—loyal and fearless to the last. It is an incomplete but not an ignoble religion. It contains those elements of character which it was the special mission of the Nordic peoples to add to modern civilization and to Christianity itself.

What Trevelyan is describing is the germ of kith and kin, provincial Christianity. But did the Europeans add that element of “character” to Christianity? I would say that they stripped Roman Christianity of its unchristian, universalist, Oriental drapery and worshipped the living God in spirit and truth. Men with hearts of flesh must have a God with a heart of flesh. And this has always been the conflict within the church of Christ. Does Christ come to human minds through a cruel, universalist system, or does He come to provincial people with hearts of flesh? The history of our people, which is the history of the faith, tells us that Christ comes to all people through their provincial hearth fires, and outside of those provincial units of grace are the false gods of the Orientals, not the true God of the European people.

The neo-pagan was wrong about the Europeans: they were not a people who were clever enough to invent a provincial God of their ascending race, they were a people who loved enough to see past the Oriental façade of the church to the true God within the church, the God of their ascending race.

God prefers mercy to sacrifice. He wants His people to stay together as a people so that faith, hope, and charity, especially charity, does not perish from the earth. The provincial European does not suffer nine-year-old boys to be driven to suicidal despair by Asian tormentors. Nor does the provincial European permit black demigods to kill white people, whom liberal oligarchs have deemed devils, with impunity. Charity demands that we be meek toward the meek, but it also demands that we be fierce in defense of the meek and the helpless. This white holocaust must end even if it means we have to kill every last liberal and every last person of color. The liberals have made this war, not us. We can’t accept their Oriental vision of existence and stand passively by while white people are sacrificed on the altars of the liberals’ colored gods. God did not shed His grace, as the blasphemous song declares, over democratic America; He shed His grace over the European people who loved much. The world saw the face of Jesus Christ through the people who had charity.

Pickwickian Europe is not dead: it lives still in the European past and in the hearts of those Europeans who refuse to let go of that sacred past. For the sake of our own souls and the sake of all tortured and tormented white people, especially our children, we must cling to that provincial Pickwickian Europe where men of mercy and charity are forever at war with Oriental cruelty and black savagery. Let us conclude where The Pickwick Papers conclude:

Let us leave our old friend in one of those moments of unmixed happiness, of which, if we seek them, there are ever some, to cheer our transitory existence here. There are dark shadows on the earth, but its lights are stronger in the contrast. Some men, like bats or owls, have better eyes for the darkness than for the light. We, who have no such optical powers, are better pleased to take our last parting look at the visionary companions of many solitary hours, when the brief sunshine of the world is blazing full upon them.

The European people who saw the Light of the world and loved Him are the one true liturgy of the Christian Church. +

Posted in Charity, Christian counter-attack, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Greatest of These

The European Upper Pasture

Posted on February 23, 2013 by cwny

“So let us state what is true. God reveals Himself to us through the intimate mysterious human relationships we form with our kith and kin. The moral beauty of the European hearth, where our kith and kin dwell, points us to the Star of Bethlehem. The moral depravity of the syncretic religion of rationalism and diversity points us toward the kingdom of Satan. The most counter-revolutionary thing that a European man can do is to refuse to bend his knee to the new diversity of races and faiths. Such a refusal will make the European man a sign of contradiction to Satan and his minions. And such is the European man’s destiny. He was born to bear witness, through his fidelity to the European hearth, to the Lamb of God who taketh away the sin of the world.” – CWNY

__________

When I was in my early twenties my extreme aversion to travel was forced to take a backseat to my intense desire to see that sacred land where Shakespeare, Dickens, and Walter Scott once dwelled in the flesh and still in spirit dwell. I was fortunate to meet some older Britons who were still of old Britain. And I was fortunate that a young man could travel cheaply if he was willing to sleep in odd places and keep to a sparse diet. Once while staying at a mountaineers’ hostel on the Isle of Skye, I was asked, in return for my lodging, to “shoo the cows from the lower pasture to the upper pasture.” I was city-bred and had never met a cow up close and personal, so I asked the woman who had assigned me my chore if there was any special technique one should use when shooing cows from the lower to the upper pasture. “Just shoo the lead cow and the rest will follow,” I was told. So, after the lead cow was pointed out to me – she had the traditional name of Bessie – I proceeded to the lower pasture in the hopes that I would soon behold the sight of Bessie leading some fifty cows or so from the lower pasture to the upper pasture. It was not that simple. I started out very politely, saying, “Shoo, Bessie.” Bessie just stared at me. “Come on, Bessie, old girl, time to go to the upper pasture,” I said next. Maybe Bessie didn’t like being called old because she still refused to move, much to the delight of some workers looking on. “This is becoming quite embarrassing,” I told myself, “I must get this cow to move.” I tried pointing while I pleaded, “Up there, Bessie, I want you to go up there.” Bessie was obdurate and didn’t move a muscle. I was beginning to think I was the victim of a hoax, that Bessie was really a statue of a cow placed there to fool city folk such as I for the amusement of country folk such as they. Then the proprietor of the farm-hostel, who had been observing me from the porch, screamed, “You have to speak with more authority.” I didn’t believe the woman by this time and thought this was just part of the joke, but I thought I might just as well be a good sport, so I mustered up my very best authoritative voice, faced Bessie, and told her to “march right up to the upper pasture before I kick you in the butt.” Lo and behold! Bessie marched right up to the upper pasture and all the other cows followed her. The farm hands and mountaineers all applauded. So the city boy triumphed. He performed the Herculean task of shooing the cows from the lower pasture to the upper pasture. But thank God I wasn’t asked to milk the cows.

Those cows with Bessie at the head are the modern Europeans, both male and female. They need someone to speak authoritatively to them and tell them to stop grazing in Liberaldom and move to the upper pastures of their European ancestors. In those green and pleasant upper pastures a white man does not experience life secondhand through negroes and the pasture is not seeded with the ethos of Babylon. But who will tell the modern Europeans to stop grazing in Liberaldom and return to their European pastures? And to what authority do the Europeans look for guidance? Ah, there’s the rub. Even if a man of the upper pastures could be found to speak authoritatively to the Europeans would they listen?

The primary authority of the European grazers is the great liberal oligarchy. The liberals control the media outlets, the schools, the government and unfortunately the churches as well. It’s like the old Westerns when a cowboy knight errant comes into a town and discovers that everybody in town cringes and crawls before one ruthless and evil man. The knight errant asks, “Why do you let this man run the town this way?” The bought-and-paid-for sheriff tells the knight errant, “This town eats because Rupert Ruthless puts meat on their tables, and nobody is going to put themselves or their family at risk by opposing Rupert Ruthless.”

“And what about the law?” the knight errant asks. “Are you afraid of Rupert Ruthless too?”

“I’m bought and paid for,” the old sheriff sighs, “and I’m too old to go to another town and another job.” The knight errant goes to the town minister and gets the same reaction as he got from the sheriff, “It’s best not to oppose Rupert Ruthless. I advise my people to get along.”

Of course the tall handsome stranger has no intention of “getting along” with the powers that be. He is a knight errant and knight errants are not moral utilitarians. He kills the two low life henchmen who Ruthless sends against him, which forces Ruthless to shift his tactics. He sends his lawyers to buy off the cowboy knight. They fail: he can’t be bought. Then Ruthless sends the beautiful dance hall girl to seduce the knight errant and make him forget his sacred mission. She too fails. Now it’s time for Ruthless to send for the best gun money can buy. When he arrives he meets the hero in the middle of the street for a gun duel which terminates with the death of the hired gun. You should know the rest of the story. The Western knight finishes what he started. He kills Rupert Ruthless, before Ruthless is able to shoot him in the back with a shotgun, and he rides out of town, leaving the townspeople free to build a better town or to find another Rupert Ruthless to sell their souls to.

The cowboy knight’s honor would not be compromised if he left town with a bride, the fair-haired daughter of the old world weary sheriff. But in this case the fair-haired damsel, though attracted to the knight errant, decides that she needs a more entrepreneurial-minded mate to help her to fulfill her dream of becoming the first woman to head up the Wells Fargo Express office. “How much do knight errants make,” she muses. “It can’t be very much.” The practical, forward-thinking damsel decides against our hero. Maybe in another town.

The old westerns were in the mold of the European fairy tales and as such they were essentially correct in their portrayals of life. The real spiritual battles that we fight are not usually as overtly physical as in the westerns, but the symbolism in the westerns is correct. We fight against an ancient foe who will stop at nothing to destroy the European people. Money, sex, power: he knows all the temptations and he does not adhere to any code of conduct: “Whatever works,” is his motto. And liberalism, the synthesis of all the demonic arts, is working quite well. The grazing Europeans seem to be permanently ensconced in the lower Babylonian pasture, grazing contently without any knowledge of an upper European pasture. So the question remains, “Is there any authoritative voice that could possibly move the European people from the lower Babylonian pasture to the upper European pasture?”

I can only point out what I see in the Europeans’ past. There once was a voice that moved them. That voice has been silenced because the human channels of grace have been dammed up. The church men, who slavishly cater to the whims of the liberal oligarchy, tell us we need not worry about a thing, under their intellectual guidance Christianity is progressing from a dirtwater, provincial, European faith to a universal, evolving faith that benefits all mankind instead of just one race of people. But God imparts to particular human hearts not to universal aggregates. If you tell me that God could have chosen another people to be the Christ bearers, I will tell you, “That is more than I know. All I know is that He did choose the Europeans.” And now that European hearts have grown tepid is the Christian faith being championed by the colored hordes? Are the colored people better off now, when the Europeans worship them instead of Christ? I certainly don’t think so. When the Europeans were intensely provincial, faith, hope, ad charity abounded, not only at the European hearth fires, but also at the hearth fires of those colored people who saw a light in the Europeans’ culture that they, with only partial understanding, tried to serve. Uncle Remus is a better man than ten thousand Obamas or Jesse Jacksons rolled into one. But still the anti-Christian church men beat their tom-toms and bid the white grazers come and worship their newfound gods of color.

Refusing to worship the colored gods, despite the mandate of church, state, and society, is the primary task of the European. Men who refuse to worship the colored gods, and who stay connected to the European past, will be able to speak from the heart to the European grazers. Will the grazers listen? Not all of them, but I agree with Burke who tells us that we should never look on our own people as irredeemable. If we speak from the depths of a heart that loves old Europe and hates Liberaldom, then we will find other hearts who will respond. An earthquake starts with a few small tremors. But we should never be deceived into believing that we can be Christian and liberal. Liberalism is from the devil and the lynchpin of Liberalism is racial diversity. Once a man steps outside his racial stronghold where his kith and kin dwell, he becomes grist for Satan’s mills. He will placidly graze in the lower pastures of Babylon, a man without a God and without a people.

For many years now I’ve watched the pro-lifers write petitions, hold protest marches and vote pro-life. All to no avail. Abortion is more ensconced in our unhallowed land than ever before. Why is this? Abortion has become part of the permanent fabric of our nation because European Christians left provincial, European Christianity behind and embraced propositional, universalist Christianity. In provincial European Christianity, which is now called racialism, the murder of infants was not tolerated. Men whose faith is bred in the bone do not have to discuss the problem of infanticide, they simply kill the perpetrators of such heinous acts. ‘Tis not so with the propositional Christian. He talks and he discusses, he pleads with the liberals to be merciful, and he votes. But people who have given themselves to the devil are not merciful. The only thing that will deter liberals from committing monstrous acts of cruelty is the sword of retribution. And no propositional Christian, grazing in the lower pastures of Babylon, is capable of wielding such a sword. Only a man who has not been spiritually emasculated, a man who has a racial stronghold, can fight Satan and his minions. The pro-lifers and their conservative counterparts are like the defenders of a fort who give the enemy attacking the fort a certain number of their own people in the hopes that the enemy will let them alone. But the dishonorable sacrifice only whets the enemies’ appetite for more victims and more plunder. Soon the fort is conquered and every defender is put to the sword. There is a moral here. When the European intelligentsia abandoned their race in an attempt to save their propositional churches, their propositional economies, and their propositional governments, they lost that which makes them human: their sacred blood ties to their people and their God. Without those ties of blood they became secondhand men and women incapable of passionate defenses of unborn babies or anyone else. All they can do is worship the liberal-sanctioned gods and beg the liberals to throw them a few concessions every now and then. The liberals never do. They simply tighten the noose.

The bovine analogy has its limits. A cow cannot be stirred to the depths of her soul, but a European can. I must repeat an old refrain: When the European hero, the man connected to the living God through the spirit and blood of His people, stands up to Satan and his minions and issues the command, “This shall not go on,” the liberals’ day will be over. The grazers will see with blinding sight through the eyes of the hero, and they will return to the green and pleasant pasture of “racist” Europe, in which they can once again see and follow their lode star, the Star of Bethlehem. +

Posted in Europe as the Christ-Bearer, Grazers, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Comments Off on The European Upper Pasture

On Earth As It Is in Heaven

Posted on February 16, 2013 by cwny

Draw thy sword.
That, if my speech offend a noble heart,
Thy arm may do thee justice; here is mine.
Behold, it is the privilege of mine honours,
My oath, and my profession. I protest,
Maugre thy strength, place, youth, and eminence,
Despite thy victor-sword and fire-new fortune,
Thy valour, and thy heart thou art a traitor;
False to thy gods, thy brother, and thy father;
Conspirant ‘gainst this high illustrious prince;
And, from th’ extremest upward of thy head
To the descent and dust below thy foot,
A most toad-spotted traitor. Say thou “No,”
This sword, this arm, and my best spirits are bent
To prove upon thy heart, whereto I speak,
Thou liest.

King Lear

__________

Edgar’s statement at the end of King Lear, “Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say,” could be interpreted as a simple moral from Aesop, “Don’t lie or you’ll get in trouble.” But if we’ve read through the play and seen the suffering Edgar has endured, and the suffering Edgar has witnessed, we know that he means something more profound than an Aesop fable when he enjoins the survivors of the British holocaust to, “Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say.”

Edgar has seen a kingdom come to ruin because a king who “hath ever but slenderly known himself,” believed the lies he told himself about his “good daughters” who were evil, and his “bad daughter” who was good, and because a father (Edgar’s) believed the lies a fiendish bastard son told of Edgar, the good son. In the wake of such misery, the usual lying that men do cannot be tolerated. A healthy body politic that has been built on truth can absorb a certain amount of lies without crumbling, but a society that has fallen because of a preponderance of lies that men regarded as the truth, can only be rebuilt by men who speak what they feel, not what they ought to say.

It is obvious to all who have eyes to see that the modern Europeans have gone through a holocaust much like the one that Edgar endured. With the great difference being that the modern Europeans still feel no need to speak the truth. The truth about European civilization is still buried under an avalanche of lies which are bound together, like a bundle of twigs, by the one great lie. The one great lie is this: The spirit cannot take flesh. To the Greeks, our incarnate Lord was foolishness, and to the Jews he was a stumbling block. And so it remains today. The liberals (the Greeks) think it is their right and duty to demonize the antique Europeans who claimed the incarnate Lord was at the center of their civilization, because the notion that God took flesh and dwelt amongst us is, to the liberals, foolishness. And the modern “conservative” Christians (the Jews) feel perfectly justified in jettisoning the Christ-bearing race and becoming spiritual Jews because they do not believe in the reality of the incarnate God. If God did not really become incarnate in Jesus Christ, then there is no reason for the defense of the European people whose past is inextricably bound to Christ incarnate. In the absence of that ancient faith, mankind is simply a mathematical equation and individual men and women are merely numbers within that equation.

Behind the liberals’ lie that their worship of the black man has to do with “civil rights” is the maniacal hatred of Christ and the Christ-bearing people. And behind the conservatives lie that they now support massive colored immigration because it is the Christian thing to do is the conservatives’ desire to please the liberal powers that be, which will enable the conservative churches to survive in Liberaldom. In point of fact the liberals won’t let the conservatives’ churches survive, but that is the conservatives’ hope.

What is happening in the ranks of the conservatives, both Christian and secular, is a gradual liberalization. And the liberalization is taking place because the conservatives do not regard the defense of their race as essential. This morally indefensible disregard of their own people is the direct result of the triumph of universalist Christianity in the once Christian churches. Every modern Christian church cares nothing for Christ as savior and everything for Christ as a figurehead for their systems. In that type of Christianity vast numbers of nameless, soulless people are necessary to keep the system afloat, so people of all races are wanted no matter whether they believe in the same God as the antique Europeans believed in or not.

Universalist Christianity was always present in the Christian academies, which never quite separated themselves from the Greek philosophical tradition. And there is no doubt that Thomist universalism shifted the focus away from the human heart as the source of our knowledge of God and turned men’s minds toward the rational contemplation of nature. But the European people had staying power; neither fire, dungeon, sword, or Aquinas could drive them away from their provincial hearth fires where they understood life “feelingly.” Through the 19th century and the early 20th century the European peasant was still European. When the collapse came, when the European everyman became an intellectual, it was total. Considering the forces arrayed against him, Church and state undergirded by science, it was a wonder the European peasant endured so long.

Now the man of Europe is an outcast man who must feign madness, like Edgar, until the hour is ripe. At such a time the trumpet will sound and a champion will appear who will re-establish the Europeans’ blood rights. It all sounds quite fairy tale-ish, but life is a fairy tale: when hope is nearly gone the hero will step forth, with Christ as his inspiration, and defeat the forces of darkness.

If the Christian church does not consist of the people who took Christ into their hearts, but instead consists of those corporate entities that are organized around some vague quasi-divine figure who cedes all power and glory to the negro, then we are not living in an age of darkness, we are living in an age of faith. All a man has to do, if this is the age of light, is worship the negro with his whole heart and soul, and he will inherit life eternal in the kingdom of Liberaldom.

In the liberal’s eye, all mankind, except for a few recalcitrant white males, seem to be heading for a brave new world where men and women of color will live as nature intended in a kind of interracial Woodstock: “We are stardust, we are golden…” But the European who knows not seems sees a different world. He sees a world where Satanism – the antique European still believes in God and the devil – reigns supreme under the guise of negro worship. He sees “conservative” churches and liberal churches joining with their secular counterparts to form one unified secular Church consecrated to one end, the perpetual worship of nature and nature’s God, the negro. Need I remind the reader that Ratzinger, before he became Benedict XVI, said that the next pope should be a black man? Now, for the first time in 700 years a pope has resigned. For what reason? To make straight the way of the negro god? Papalotry will take on a new intensity should a black man formally ascend to the rank he already holds informally. And every Protestant denomination is following the Catholic lead. They will not rest till they have made explicit what they have already implicitly stated: “The black man is our god.” (1)

In the latter half of the 20th century two men, Russell Kirk and Anthony Jacob, wrote books in which they presented their conservative visions. Kirk’s book The Conservative Mind was published in 1953 and Anthony Jacob’s book White Man Think Again was published in 1965. Kirk’s book was received favorably in mainstream publications such as Time magazine, was lauded by conservatives, and given a respectful hearing by liberals. Jacob’s book received no reviews in any mainstream publications and was condemned by the few conservatives and liberals who did read the book. Why the different reactions to the two conservative authors? Kirk’s book was more scholarly, but Jacob’s book was more profound and poetic. Kirk quoted many great conservative authors, such as Burke and Scott, but he failed to understand what was at the heart of such great men’s works. Quite possibly he failed to understand them because in order to understand great hearts it is necessary to have more than a great intellect; one must have a great heart. The Conservative Mind was heralded in later years by conservative publisher Henry Regnery as the book that began the postwar conservative movement. He should have added that the book also ended the postwar conservative movement because it advocated an intellectual conservatism, devoid of passion, that was the complete antithesis of the passionate conservatism of many of the men mentioned in The Conservative Mind. Kirk’s book on conservatism reads like an encyclopedia, and in that encyclopedia we never read about the necessity of conserving the European people, without whom there would be no books about the necessity of conserving Western civilization, because there would be no Western civilization. It is in Jacob’s book that we ascend to the heights. His conservatism, which is grounded in a passionate love for his people, is the conservatism of Burke, of Scott, and William Shakespeare. Conservatism must be based on a passionate love for our kith and kin. Any other form of conservatism does not conserve, it becomes part of liberalism.

No man ever was attached by a sense of pride, partiality, or real affection, to a description of square measurement. He never will glory in belonging to the Chequer No. 71, or to any other badge-ticket. We begin our public affections in our families. No cold relation is a zealous citizen. We pass on to our neighbourhoods, and our habitual provincial connexions. These are inns and resting-places. Such divisions of our country as have been formed by habit, and not by a sudden jerk of authority, were so many little images of the great country in which the heart found something which it could fill. The love to the whole is not extinguished by this subordinate partiality.

The day of reckoning is upon us. The conservatives are blending with the liberals in order to kill every last remnant of Christian Europe. The old philosophical systems will survive as museum pieces, but the liberal-conservative coalition has no intention of allowing the Europeans’ Christian past to interfere with the Babylonian present. If we respond to the Babylonians with the usual conservative responses – “Let’s discuss the definition of a ‘people’” and “Let’s come up with a plan to develop think-tanks dedicated to the universality of the human mind” – we will fail to preserve that which is necessary to preserve: the European people and their ancient culture. The liberals with the aid of the conservatives hope to liquidate God by eliminating all the human conduits to God.

For the sake of the God whom the liberals hate, let us not be too rational in our response to this newly formed alliance between the conservatives and the liberals. Let us hate, with all our hearts, all those who threaten — and they are legion — our God and our people. The passionate hatred of the devil and his works can only come from a heart that loves. I don’t believe that a man with a European heart can ever be defeated by liberalism. Such a belief is irrational, but I’ve seen the miracle of Christian Europe, which was built by the union of European hearts with His Sacred Heart. So why shouldn’t I believe in Europe’s resurrection? Through Him and in Him, our ties to Christ were formed at the European hearth fire. As long as we stay at that hearth fire, we will stay connected to the living God.

In utopian literature all children become the responsibility of everybody else; there are no parents. There are no wives or husbands either, but somehow despite the fact that all the small, provincial channels of God’s grace are destroyed, there is universal peace and harmony. From Plato through Thomas More, the Jesuits in Latin America, the Jacobins, the Marxists, and the modern democratic utopians, the refrain is always the same: “We the people shall build a new and better world over the ruins of provincial, racist Europe.” But all that we love and care for is in that older Europe. Our kith and kin are there and so is our God. And what is this new world that the liberals and the new age conservatives have prepared for us? Is it really stardust and golden? No, it is darkness and blasphemy. We are not meant to live in Babylon and we shall not. Let the trumpet sound, and the European who knows not seems will rise and ride in defense of his people and his God. “Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” +

____________________________

(1) It’s significant that Ratzinger, the “conservative” pope, did not wish for any particular black pope, he just wished for a black pope. It is blackness in the abstract that the liberals and the conservatives worship. What does such worship have to do with Christianity? Whether Ratzinger gets his wish or not, the fact that this supposedly conservative pope so desperately yearns for a black god speaks volumes about the state of organized, conservative Christianity.

Posted in Christianity: Neither a Theory Nor a Philosophy, Fairy tale mode of understanding, Incarnational Christianity, Older posts (pre-April 2019) | Tagged | Comments Off on On Earth As It Is in Heaven

Heart and Soul

Posted on February 9, 2013 by cwny

But now all is to be changed. All the pleasing illusions, which made power gentle, and obedience liberal, which harmonized the different shades of life, and which, by a bland assimilation, incorporated into politics the sentiments which beautify and soften private society, are to be dissolved by this new conquering empire of light and reason. All the decent drapery of life is to be rudely torn off. All the superadded ideas, furnished from the wardrobe of a moral imagination, which the heart owns, and the understanding ratifies, as necessary to cover the defects of our naked, shivering nature, and to raise it to dignity in our own estimation, are to be exploded as ridiculous, absurd, and antiquated fashion.

On this scheme of things, a king is but a man; a queen is but a woman; a woman is but an animal; and an animal not of the highest order. All homage paid to the sex in general as such, and without distinct views, is to be regarded as romance and folly. Regicide, and parricide, and sacrilege, are but fictions of superstition, corrupting jurisprudence by destroying its simplicity. The murder of a king, or a queen, or a bishop, or a father, are only common homicide; and if the people are by any chance, or in any way, gainers by it, a sort of homicide much the most pardonable, and into which we ought not to make too severe a scrutiny. –Edmund Burke

__________

This kaleidoscope of horror that we see before our eyes is the complete antithesis of Christian Europe. We can’t even call the modern nations with European origins civilizations. They are mixed conglomerates of people without a past, facing an indeterminate future. The fall of the Europeans has been like a second fall of man. Having shown the world that God’s grace was a living, breathing reality the Europeans proceeded, in the 20th century, to turn away from the Christian God in order to embrace the fallen angel. By the 21st century sins that cried out to heaven for vengeance during Europe’s Christian era were institutionalized virtues: Miscegenation, abortion, and euthanasia became part of humanity’s march onward to the liberal light, which is in reality the black night of Satan.

Burke’s battle with the arch fiend Rev. Dr. Price, over what was ‘natural’ that a man should feel in the wake of the French Revolution, highlights the differences between the Christian civilization that we have left behind and the brave new Babylonian world of darkness that we presently live in.

Both Burke and Price used the word ‘natural’ as a way of saying something was in keeping with all that was good and noble in a man. Thus Dr. Price said it was natural that he should exult in the murder of the French aristocrats and the humiliation of the King and Queen (especially the Queen) of France. And in direct contrast to Price, Burke said it was natural that he should feel sympathy for the French aristocrats and the King and Queen. There is no middle ground between Burke and Price, although many men who fear to choose between right and wrong have tried to find a middle ground between the two divergent points of the moral compass. The modern Europeans have chosen the ethos and faith of the Rev. Dr. Price. I, and a remnant band of antique Europeans, have chosen the ethos and faith of Edmund Burke.

For Price it is natural to support the satanic men of the French Revolution because he believes that men are by nature thinking animals. Their superiority over other animals is simply one of intelligence; other than that difference in degree, men are animals who “must perforce prey on themselves like monsters of the deep.” Those men who are the most natural, which means the most primitive and barbaric, are the best men and must be exalted as they slay the most unnatural of men. In France during the Revolution it was the Jacobins who were the most natural, and therefore good and noble, and today it is the blacks and the other creatures of color who have become the exalted ones that can do no evil, because they are natural.

In Price’s mind-forged world biological nature is all. But in Burke’s world what is natural is something inside of a man that is more than his biological nature. In Burke’s Christian view of life the heartfelt passion is the mark of a man’s humanity, and his reason is simply a broadsword to defend that passion. Who can doubt that Burke is right? The liberals themselves act upon their passion, which is a passion to destroy the image of God in man, and use their reason to defend that passion. Burke maintained that the liberals’ passion to kill and destroy their own was an unnatural passion that went against the faith which made Europe. He warned all Europeans that such an unnatural passion, based on a vision of an inhumane, distorted view of what was natural, could only bring ruin upon every nation of Europe. Price disagreed, and his satanic view of man, for the present, has prevailed. The conservative movements in the 20th century failed to stop the spread of Jacobin liberalism because the conservatives tried to find a middle ground between Price’s religion of nature, which deifies the natural man (destined to become the black man), and Burke’s religion of untaught feelings, feelings which instruct our reason and lead us to our Redeemer.  There can be no middle ground between Price and Burke: either we are of the spirit and belong to a loving God, or we are of the biological dung heap and belong to cold, inhumane, heartless nature.

Burke saw that Price’s theology of nature, which is the modern liberal’s theology, came “nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man.” The denial of an animating spirit within man is the essence of Price’s liberalism and modern liberalism. Price’s liberal descendents want to make the outer ornamental world of nature the whole world. In such a world there are no physical signs of deep and mysterious things of the spirit. Blood is mere liquid, skin color is mere pigmentation, and science, which tells us that the outer biological realm of existence is the only realm, is our holy writ.

The liberals, in keeping with their theology of soulless nature, have hardened themselves, like Lady Macbeth, against the “compunctious visitings of nature.” But Lady Macbeth ultimately succumbed to the compunctious visitings of nature. The Rev. Prices of the world do not succumb because they have a theology that is proof against every decent instinct in the human breast: “Nothing can be conceived more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician.” And that is the key to the destruction of Christian Europe. Once the European peasant (I use ‘peasant’ in the everyman sense, not in the agrarian sense) became a metaphysician, after centuries of listening to clergymen tell him that abstract reason was man’s only touchstone of reality, he lost his natural horror of liberal atrocities. His good instincts, which were bred in the bone of the European at his family hearth fire, were killed by the rationalism of the thoroughbred metaphysicians. Every day in Liberaldom there are atrocities that a European of the era when men had natural instincts would have put a stop to. I thought of this the other day when I saw a children’s cartoon show based on the Dr. Seuss story The Cat in the Hat. Although Seuss went anti-nuclear in his later work in the 1970s, his books from the 1950s and early sixties, such as The Cat in the Hat, The Cat in the Hat Comes Back, The King’s Stilts, To Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street, etc., were quite amusing and great fun for white children. The new version of The Cat in the Hat showed two children, one white girl and one black boy, both offspring of one white mother with no father in sight. There, in a once classic children’s story, we have two blasphemies – miscegenation and adultery – or maybe it was just miscegenation and promiscuous sex (the cartoon was not clear about that). Should such soul poisoning garbage be permitted? Of course not. But in the absence of men with a natural aversion to the spiritual rape of children, the sponsors and the writers of such blasphemous, perverted filth will go unpunished.

Turn the page or the channel and you will encounter the news about The Obama administration’s plan to place women in combat. All the practical reasons against such a move — and there are numerous practical reasons against women in combat — pale in comparison to the one spiritual reason: no man permits the life bearers and life nurturers to go into combat. But again, when there are no Christian peasants with a natural, instinctive aversion to Satanism, well then, Satanism will flourish.

I could go on and on, but we know what is happening. Two additional horrors are the murder of infants and the legalized murder of the elderly and the infirm, both under the guise of a brave new world in which nature and nature’s god, the negro, is honored and revered. Can the worship of negroes absolve the liberals of their sins against God and man? The European, with a natural hatred for the works of the devil, and a natural love for Christ and His people, feels that no man, who is still a man, can countenance the liberals’ blasphemies or their atrocities. Just as Christ will be forever at war with Satan, so will the unimproved, prejudiced, non-progressive European, the Goth, be eternally at war with the liberal.

There are unselfish things a parent does for his children that, when viewed from a purely selfish, pragmatic viewpoint by an outsider, seem like acts of insanity. Yet the parent who does such things does not even think about those acts of self-sacrifice. He does them because it is in his or her nature to do such acts. The parent loves his children with a deep and abiding love that is beyond reason; it is a love that often imitates the divine love which passeth all understanding. That unceasing unselfish sacrifice that a good parent makes for his children is the type of love that made Christian Europe. Millions upon millions of Europeans who did not count the cost or ask, “Is my self-sacrifice worth it?,” built Christendom, because they loved much. They had the greatest of these: they had charity. It’s not a process we can see with the naked eye, but when the European once again acts according to his inner nature instead of acting according to the abstract metaphysics of liberal gurus, then he will be a man again and he will destroy Liberaldom and rebuild Christendom because it is natural, in the Burkean sense of the word, that he should do so.

Dostoyevsky’s underground man said that a man lives for one purpose, to prove that he is a man and not a piano key. The religious and secular metaphysicians want to play upon man as if he is a piano key. With their abstract reason they will direct poor, bare, unaccommodated man to their vision of the truth. But the truth can only be known by a passionate heart. For good or ill human beings are subject to their passions. Some men have a passion for God and some for the devil, and there is no simple explanation for men’s preferences. What a man does know, contra Descartes, is that he sees and understands existence feelingly. “I love, therefore I am,” is the European’s affirmation of faith. Hamlet only becomes Hamlet when he knows he has loved: “This is I, Hamlet, the Dane!” Death is not the ultimate tragedy, because death does not extinguish the soul. The ultimate tragedy is a secondhand life, a life devoid of the passion which can only be engendered by a love for our kith and kin. That type of love connects us to the God of love. A passion for abstract relationships with abstract children of nature engenders a secondhand love for Satan and all his works. The European people once had faces, when they loved their own people and their God. Listen to Rose Barton’s description of an Englishman’s love for his departed Queen:

The Queen had made herself beloved of her people. She had borne such sorrows in her heart with such splendid patience—she had been such an example to us all, so full of love and dignity,–that she had become our own. And then to feel that all these strong ties were broken—no: not really broken, for they will remain always, binding the hearts of her people to her memory! It was sad beyond measure to see it all. Near me there was standing a big man—probably a costermonger—with a stricken face—evidently a thorough man—but hard-looking, as one so often sees in that type. The crowd was quite wonderful—the silence and the solemn feeling of intense, respectful sorrow on all around were more than I can describe. Well, this man remained, very still and attentive, during the hours I waited there; and then at last came by us that splendid throng of mourning kings and princes, with their beloved dead. I cannot express what only the beating of one’s heart can tell. This man remained grim and silent. As soon as the procession came in sight he dragged off his battered cap, and the hard face changed—and in it one saw the influence of the sorrow that had touched his heart, as it touched the hearts of all-for he had lost his Mother in his Queen.

Oh, what a falling off was there! Can we ever again have hearts like our European ancestors? Only if we cast off our second-hand faith in negroes and science and embrace the people and the God of provincial Europe. +

Posted in Blood faith, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization, Scientism | Tagged , | Comments Off on Heart and Soul

Mankind’s Whole Tale

Posted on February 2, 2013 by cwny

O boundless heart, kept fresh by pity’s dews! – John Sterling

__________

I was saddened to learn of the passing of Stan Musial. He was one of the heroes of my youth, but my initial sadness at Musial’s death was deepened tenfold when I heard him praised, in passing, for his whole hearted acceptance of black players in baseball. “Say it ain’t so, Stan.” It’s rather pathetic, what little praise that is afforded to a white man who has done something of note in this world is given to the extent he aided the ongoing liberal campaign to deify the black race. Had Musial been as courageously anti-integration as Ty Cobb and Dixie Walker, he would have earned the hatred of the liberals, but he then would have been truly worthy of his name, “Stan the Man.”

The liberals never miss an opportunity to preach their gospel. The life lesson preached at Musial’s funeral and countless similar occasions has not been lost on young white people. “You can have a life” — albeit a secondhand life — “to the extent that you denounce your own racial identify and serve the cause of the great cosmic negro.” Is this the promised end of the white man? Is this what God intended us to do with our lives, to serve the negro with our whole heart and soul? The liberals say, “yes, we are on this earth to worship and serve the negro.” And surprisingly the Christian church men also tell us that we must worship the negro. I say surprisingly because the Christian church men all work for organizations that once worshipped Jesus Christ. The mainstream churches have openly repudiated Christ as the Son of God, turning him into a social worker who wants all mankind to worship the negro, while the conservative splinter churches are attempting to fuse Christian worship with negro worship. I prefer the outright repudiation practiced by mad-dog liberals to the fusionism of the conservative liberals, but in either case the white man becomes a less than human creature dependent on the colored races, especially the negro, for confirmation that still he lives.

To this pass the European has come because he lost his lifeline to the living God. He loved his theory about God more than God. And the theoretical God did not need to become incarnate in a people; he did not need to enter human hearts, he could come direct to special men with giant brains. But the special men with the ‘Giant Brains Faith’ ran aground and left the white man without a God and without a people. Our Lord said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” Why did the European intellectuals not take Him at His word?

It is not enough to know the truth intellectually: men must love the truth. And we are so constituted that that we cannot love the truth unless we see it embodied in humanity. Christ took flesh and dwelt among us so we could see and love the truth. The European people of the olden times took Christ into their hearts and as a consequence their culture reflected the true image of Christ, the God of mercy and love. Without that incarnational vision of Christ, mankind is left without a true vision of the living god. All we have is intellectual concepts of the heathen gods and false “Christian” intellectual systems in which Christ appears as some kind of a peace-loving guru or a special forerunner of Martin Luther King Jr., but not as the Man of Sorrows or the King of Kings.

The apologists for a Christianity without a Christian Europe tell us that the more natural, colored people of the earth will take Christ into their hearts and place the Christian churches on the true path, purified of the European defilements, toward paradise. There are none so blind as those who will not see. When left to their own devices, separate from Europeans, what do the colored people make of Christianity? Does Christ live in the hearts of the African negroes? Have Africans astounded the world with their Christian civilization, as John Paul II told us they would? Have the Asians as a people shown us any indication that they intend to turn from their merciless, cruel gods and embrace the European Christ? Need I go on and ask the same questions about the red and brown people of color? It isn’t necessary. They all — red, yellow, black, and brown – are people who cannot see the Truth and love Him. Miracles do happen. There are the colored Gunga Din’s who become Christian, but they do so because they have been vouchsafed a vision of the living God who took flesh and dwelt with the European people. If the Europeans blend with the colored peoples of the world, or if they allow the colored people to exterminate the white race, there will be no dwelling place for the living God. Truth will be an outcast man huddled in the crags and crannies of the earth while heathen falsehood is a pampered guest at all the banquet tables in multi-racial Babylon.

The mad-dog liberal hates Christ hence he seeks to destroy Christ’s image in man by destroying the Europeans’ past so that they can never reclaim their identity and their God. The liberal conservatives differ slightly from the mad-dog liberals. They love their various Christian systems, so long as their systems survive they are indifferent to the fate of the Europeans. Though not as manically opposed to the European people as the mad-dog liberals, the liberal-conservatives do not see why multi-racialism and Christianity are incompatible. They cannot see the truth staring them in the face because their mind forged systems have blinded them to the heartfelt faith of their ancestors. Their pride of intellect overcame their hearts and they succumbed to Babylon. With might and main they struggle to make their churches more “diverse” so that the mad-dog liberals will let their churches alone. But what good is it to have a church without Christ or His people?

Can there be a non-European Christ? Have we, the European people, looked at a false Messiah through a distorted lens? That is what the liberals and Satan would have us believe so that then we would be forced to give up our racial identities and beg to be absorbed into the great, cosmic, multi-racial dung heap. “Blessed be oblivion, blessed be our nondescript multi-racial personalities, Amen.” But it won’t work. Cover the Europeans of the past with ridicule, with scorn, with moral condemnation, with endless charges of stupidity, and still the European Phoenix will rise from the dead just as He rose from the dead on the third day. The liberals and their mentor, our ancient foe, can never understand that there is something invincible in the soul of a European who has felt the warmth of a European hearth-fire. The love and passion of our Lord provides the divine warmth of that fire, and hearts so warmed cannot rest easy in Liberaldom. They must destroy it.

When we look at what the liberals hold sacred and what the antique Europeans held to be sacred we can see a very clear fairy tale world of good vs. evil. In the European fairy tales the devil visits the earth in the form of a black man. Haven’t the liberals, with a satanic sixth sense, sought to deify Satan through the good offices (or should we say bad offices?) of the black man? Behind the façade of “civil rights” and “diversity” is the deification of the black man who is the conduit to Satan.

And what of the much vilified white man? To whom or what is he a conduit? I think I’ve made my opinions on that subject known. The white man can lead the Satanic men of color against his own kind, or he can be as a white man is meant to be, the voice of one crying in the wilderness, making straight the way of the Lord. What John Sterling said of Shakespeare can be said about the divine mission of the white man:

O boundless heart, kept fresh by pity’s dews!
O wit humane and blithe! O sense sublime!
Transcendent form of man! In whom we read
Mankind’s whole tale of impulse, thought and deed!
Amid the expanse of years, beholding thee,
We know how vast our world of life may be;
Wherein, perchance, with aims as pure as thine,
Small tasks and strengths may be no less divine.

That is what the race war is all about. The antique Europeans, through their culture, told “Mankind’s whole tale of impulse, thought and deed!” They told of a world redeemed by the blood of the lamb. They told us we were not born to die, we were destined for that vast world presided over by the King of Kings.

The liberals have spared no pains, and will continue to spare no pains, in eradicating the heartfelt tale of the ancient Europeans, because the liberals want all mankind to build their lives upon the liberals’ tale, which is a tale of savage beasts preying upon each other. There is no sublimity in the liberals’ tale, no redeemer, no grace. I prefer the tale told by my people in the not-so-distant past. I will stay by the European hearth fire, because it is my world, and I shall never want or seek any other. +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Older posts (pre-April 2019), Restoration of European civilization | Tagged , | Comments Off on Mankind’s Whole Tale