“I can live no longer by thinking.”
– Orlando, As You Like it
The democratic movements throughout Europe in the 1840s were extensions of the French Revolution that Burke warned would envelop all of Europe if the Jacobin snake was scotched but not killed. The so-called Civil War in the United States was our extension of the French Revolution: the Jacobin North made war on the Christian South. Though all the democratic bloodbaths were couched in high-sounding words such as freedom, equality, fraternity, and emancipation, the intent in each and every democratic movement was the same – to supplant the Christian faith, the guiding light of the European people, and replace that faith with the darkness of liberalism. And by World War I the Jacobins’ utopian dream had become a reality. It’s significant that Woodrow Wilson justified his anti-nation’s entrance into the war with the words, “The world must be made safe for democracy.” He did not say that the European nations needed to become democracies; that would have implied a pre-1840s Europe. He said that the world needed to be made safe for democracy, which implied, correctly, that the European nations had become liberal democracies and were now an aggressive, expanding power determined to destroy all the non-democratic elements – translation: non-liberal elements – in their own and other nations. And let us have no doubt that when we are talking about democracies we are talking about utopian, liberal states completely opposed to European Christianity. They might be compatible with speculative Christianity, but they are not in line with bred-in-the-bone European Christianity, which is the only Christianity that St. Paul and our European forefathers knew.
The liberals came into power promising that they could usher in a perfect world. Have they done so? No, they haven’t. From my perspective, which is that of the antique Europeans, they have not only failed to improve mankind’s lot here on earth, they have also taken away men’s hope for a better lot in another world. But how, having failed to deliver on their promises of utopian bliss, have the liberals managed to maintain themselves in power for over one hundred years. No state, no matter how totalitarian-ly efficient, can last over one hundred years without a great deal of genuine support from the governed. So again, we must ask: How have the liberals maintained themselves in power for over one hundred years?
We start with the primary seductive rationale of all utopian states. The utopians promise that if the great unwashed mass of humanity will follow their guidance, a new paradisiacal state of existence will be the permanent lot of mankind. And when the paradisiacal state fails to materialize, what happens then? That’s easy: you blame the recalcitrant reactionaries, whether they be unborn babies, aristocrats, monarchists, Christians, white people, old people, or some other scapegoat, for impeding the march to utopia. This is why the utopian is never fazed when aristocrats, white people, or unborn babies are slaughtered. Such creatures are in the way of utopia, which is always about to come into fruition but somehow always eludes us.
It is no easy operation to eradicate humanity from the human breast. What Shakespeare calls “the compunctious visitings of nature” will sometimes knock at their hearts, and protest against their murderous speculations. But they have a means of compounding with their nature. Their humanity is not dissolved. They only give it a long prorogation. They are ready to declare, that they do not think two thousand years too long a period for the good that they pursue. It is remarkable, that they never see any way to their projected good but by the road of some evil. Their imagination is not fatigued with the contemplation of human suffering through the wild waste of centuries added to centuries of misery and desolation. Their humanity is at their horizon—and, like the horizon, it always flies before them. The geometricians, and the chemists, bring, the one from the dry bones of their diagrams, and the other from the soot of their furnaces, dispositions that make them worse than indifferent about those feelings and habitudes, which are the support of the moral world.
But while the liberals are hardening their hearts and those of their adherents to the sufferings of the recalcitrants, whose sacrificial blood will build utopia, they must deliver something to their devotees to assure them that utopian bliss is still coming. Russian communism did not fail because the Russian people wanted to return to Christianity. It failed because the communist leaders were unable to give their people enough comfort stops on the road to utopia. The Russian communists were beaten by their Jacobin competitors in the United States and Europe, who were and still are keeping their people in check with comfort stops along the utopian way. Russia is now playing an aggressive catch-up game with the other European utopias, trying to shift from the naked-fist utopianism of communism to the seductive, subtler, comfort stop utopianism of the West. The modern Russian adjustment is much like the French Jacobins adjustment once they cast off Robespierre. They are still hard-hearted utopians, but they are now trying to use the church and the democratic process, like the other European nations do, to advance their satanic agenda rather than using the muggish, thuggish tactics of their communist predecessors.
Utopianism is a European phenomenon, because utopian thinking only rears its ugly head among post-Christian people. The colored races, having never taken Christianity to heart, do not indulge in utopian thinking. Every utopian system is an inversion of Christianity. The current utopian model, which is basically the same in all of the post-Christian European nations, runs along the following lines: Life is a pilgrimage toward utopia. If we look to the end of the journey, we see a great throne with a negro sitting upon it. He presides over a people who are all brown and black and who are celebrating as the worshippers of the biblical golden calf celebrated. Along the way we see the comfort stops, positioned where the crosses and kneelers used to be on the old Christian roads. The first stop is at one of the Christian churches. Here the pilgrim is told that Christ is not who the old, evil Europeans said he was. He is not the Savior, he is a forerunner of the black man, who is the savior of all the people of the world, with the exception of white people. What is the black savior saving mankind from? He is saving them from white people and from a false vision of Christ. The ‘real’ Christ, the forerunner of the black messiah, does not condemn personal sins such as the ones listed in the Ten Commandments. The new Christ condemns social sins such as sexism, homophobia, and above all, racism.
Some pilgrims skip the Christian church altogether and go to the secular psychiatrists’ station of the new cross. It makes no difference: the psychiatrist and the church men both speak the same jargon. Faith, as they define it, is merely a speculative exercise of the brain. So why not adopt a guilt-free, natural faith that allows a man to become a happy, participating member of a Babylonian kingdom of nature? And after this life? The church men and the psychiatrists unite with the multi-racial gypsies of Babylon:
“To be resolved into the elements,” said the hardened atheist, pressing his fettered arms against his bosom; “my hope, trust, and expectation is that the mysterious frame of humanity shall melt into the general mass of nature, to be recompounded in the other forms with which she daily supplies those which daily disappear, and return under different forms – the watery particles to streams and showers, the earthy parts to enrich their mother earth, the airy portions to wanton in the breeze, and those of fire to supply the blaze of Aldebaran and his brethren. – In this faith have I lived, and I will die in it!” –Quentin Durward
Perhaps this modern obsession with saving mother earth is related to the liberals’ new faith in their future absorption into “the general mass of nature.”
Is it necessary to list all the comfort stops along the liberal way? The sporting comfort stop is a vital one and so is the scientific comfort stop. The modern liberal must keep all the comfort stops open and accessible to the modern age Europeans in order to avoid falling on the same rocks on which Russian communism plunged to its death. And the liberal cannot afford to let go of his personal god, the sacred negro, because he sustains the liberals’ comfort stops and his utopian vision of the future. We are all marching toward the negroization of the world. The negro has become the replacement for Christ, and the various liberal comfort stations have become the conduits to the negro just as the antique European’s fidelity to their racial and familial hearth fire kept them connected to Christ.
There are other competing utopian visions to the current liberal, negro-worshipping utopian vision, but the alternative utopias have failed to catch on as the liberals’ Babylonian utopia has. The neo-pagans, for instance, project a future devoid of white Christians and colored barbarians in which they, the men of intellect, rule over some kind of soulless world of computers, science labs, and Viking sperm banks. The neo-pagan utopians do not worship the negro as the liberal utopians do, but they do share the liberals’ hatred for the antique Europeans who believed that Christ was the son of God. If He be not risen, I don’t see any difference between the liberals’ garbage heap or the neo-pagans’ garbage heap.
The irony of this age of utopias, of the liberal left and the neo-pagan left, is that the lives of the utopians are sustained by the Christian culture of the antique Europeans whom they despise. While amidst their false communities and their heathen churches the utopians must occasionally catch a glimpse of or feel a gentle wind from the Christ-centered, life-sustaining culture of the antique Europeans, or else they will completely wither and die, because there is no spiritual life in the Christ-hating, European-hating cultures of the utopians.
The utopian death in life cultures, with their treacherous comfort stations, use the tactics of the devil to keep their adherents dreaming of utopia while they live in hell,
But tis strange;
And oftentimes to win us to our harm,
The instruments of darkness tell us truths
Win us with honest trifles to betray’s
In deepest consequence.
For how long will the European people settle for the honest trifles of the comfort stations which are meant to betray them in deepest consequence, to place their bodies on the sacrificial altars of the bloody negro gods and place their souls in hell?
If, and it is a big ‘if’, the Europeans could throw off speculative living and actually live life first-hand, they would no longer be in danger of extinction. As things stand now, the Europeans are dead, because they have lost their capacity to love and hate: they can only speculate about such feelings. A man with a living, breathing heart, a non-speculative heart, would not stand by and utter inanities about being “full of grief and sorrow” at the torture murder of his people while in the same breath “forgiving” the torture murderers. A man with a heart capable of loving would hate those who murder his people and desecrate his blood faith. A true white man loves and hates with all his heart; a speculative white man has no passionate loves or hates, he merely speculates about love and hate and lives life second-hand through the colored races who are incapable of loving the good, as the Europeans once did, but have an infinite capacity for hatred, hatred of the good. That is the difference between the colored barbarians, the speculative white man, and the true white man. The colored barbarians are fueled with a satanic hatred for everything white, pure, and noble. The speculative white loves and hates second hand through the negro. He loves his black god and hates the white, speculatively of course. The ancient white man loves and hates first-hand, in a mysterious way which is unknown to the colored barbarians. The white man’s hate stems from his love of his own. When his people are threatened, he responds with a hatred for the enemy which passeth the understanding of the colored barbarians, who only know the hatred that stems from hatred, not the hatred which comes from love. “Stop! This shall not go on!,” will never be heard from a speculative white man, but it is the war cry of the bred-in-the-bone Christian European when he sees his kith and kin threatened.
Let us cease to speculate about the race problem. Let us cease bending over backwards to find the “good blacks.” And above all, let us stop trying to fight liberalism from within liberalism. We can’t vote Satanism away. “Stop! This must not go on, in the name of God, this must not go on.” There is a land for the pure and free white man, a land where there is no excuse for clerics who betray their people and their God. A land where colored barbarians are not permitted to murder and rape white people with impunity. That land is Christian Europe. If the European loves and hates with all his heart, refusing to speculate his people and his God into non-existence, then miracles will occur. +