One People, One Lord

“Iron out of Calvary is master of men all!” – Rudyard Kipling

__________

The liberals’ cauldron of racial diversity, sexual diversity, and religious diversity that had been brewing for most of the 20^th century finally boiled over in the mid-1960s. What was implicit in the post World War I generations became explicit in the mid-1960s: “We, the European people, believe in science, not Christ.” Is it that simple? Of course not. Many Europeans (in fact most) tried to blend Christianity and science. But in the end science won out. Even those who denounced materialism and technology like the Sixties’ hippies needed their drugs, their birth control pills, and their abortions in order to live “naturally.”

By the mid-1960s the scientized Europeans became like the secularized Jews. They fed off the older Christian culture that spiritually sustained them while doing everything in their power to destroy that culture. Science, like Judaism, cannot sustain a people, because both secularized faiths lack a Messiah. This longing for a Messiah, a longing that can only be realized in Christian Europe, resulted in a dichotomy in the European liberal and their spiritual counterparts, the secularized Jews. They rejected the Light of the World while longing for some substitute for the Light of the World – a friend who was almost supernatural in his devotion and kindness:

When you’re down and out
When you’re on the street
When evening falls so hard
I will comfort you.

I’ll take your part
When darkness comes
And pain is all around
Like a bridge over troubled water
I will lay me down

Henry Francis Lyte, a man from that other European world, said that the friend who abides with us in all our troubles is Christ:

Abide with me; fast falls the eventide;
The darkness deepens; Lord with me abide!
When other helpers fail and comforts flee,
Help of the helpless, O abide with me!

Joseph Scriven, writing in 1857, concurred with Lyte: “What a Friend we have in Jesus, all our sins and griefs to bear!”

Is it a progression to reject Christ for a mythical friend in the future, a kind of sensitized Übermensch, who will be our bridge over the troubled waters of existence? “Yes, it is a progression,” the liberals tell us. “It is a progression because sensitive Übermensches are real while Christ is a fiction.” We are always faced with Dostoyevsky’s question: “Can an intelligent man, a European, believe in the divinity of Christ?” The liberals and the intellectualized European peasants have all said no to that question in the 20th century, and as a result they worship negroes in the 21st century.

Science was a cold, indifferent God to the Europeans. Like Rumpelstiltskin, they needed something human in their lives. So they went looking for a suffering servant and came up with the negro. He became the true man, the man of nature, who, when blended with science could be the savior the Europeans had lost when they rejected Christ. Negro worship will intensify so long as the “intelligent” Europeans reject Christ. The Christian churchmen who are currently trying to fuse negro worship with Christianity will end up as high priests in the cult of the negro. It has always been thus. Christ will not be blended. He is “Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.” If you reject Him as Lord, He will not be content to serve as an auxiliary god in a new church in which the negro is the primary god.

It’s rather ironic that now, when the Europeans have more empirically verifiable proof that Christ existed and His tomb was indeed empty than they ever had before, that they no longer believe in Christ’s resurrection from the dead. One wonders if they had the ultimate proof before their eyes and could see and touch the risen Lord, as the doubting Thomas did, if they would believe. Once a man is convinced that truth can only be found in the science lab under a microscope he will be blind to the truth staring him in the face.

Everything of importance in our life depends on our vision. If we see life feelingly with our hearts, we will not seek God in nature but in the recesses of the human heart. In Chateaubriand’s magnificent commentary on the sin of Adam and Eve, he said their sin would not have been as egregious if they had wanted to love too much. But instead they wanted to know too much, which made their sin much greater, because they deliberately cut themselves off from the organ of sight, the human heart. So it was with the Hebrew people when they displeased God. They gave themselves to the forces of nature, glorifying the physical universe rather than the God who imparts to human hearts. And likewise the scholastics’ revolt – if God can be found ‘out there’ in nature by the human mind, then the human mind that contemplates nature becomes God. Though each would repudiate the other, the Thomist and the stardust-and-golden hippie have the same tragically flawed theology. And it’s flawed because it leads to the witch’s cauldron of diversity instead of the hearth fires of the antique Europeans where Christ dwells.

The new faith in the negro has become institutionalized, but as is so often the case when a religion becomes institutionalized on a large scale it no longer arouses the same passion it did in its early stages. The sixties’ liberals such as Chris Matthews are still passionate about the negro gods, but younger Europeans take their religion for granted, just as a 18th century nobleman might perform his religious duties because it’s the accepted thing to do along with fox hunts and entertaining large numbers of friends and political allies. The young Europeans accept the divine status of the negro, occasionally telling an irreverent joke about him, and go on with their wretched lives, unaware there is any sin other than racism, any culture other than Babylon, and any God other than the negro. The darkness deepens for the European people – they need a living God who will abide with them.

I can’t get past that nine-year-old English boy who committed suicide after being tormented by Asian spawns of Satan. The boy was a victim of what the liberals call diversity, which is the code name for the hatred of the white race and the worship of the colored races. Our children are being taught to hate themselves and to expect a life of torture at the hands of the savage races of color. And a false universalism in the Christian churches is responsible for the suicide of the white race: because the church men have called the love of one’s kith and kin, the only type of love that can connect us to Him, racist and heinous. Without their racial backbone the European people are without a soul:

There is nothing remotely noble about multiracialism as the Press would have it [ed. I would add “as the clergy would have it” as well]. On the contrary, it is loathsome and sinister. It is not Godly but Devilish: an offense against the Creator. To espouse it means that one despises one’s own race, one’s own wife and children, and their children in turn. This means that one cannot venerate or respect anything at all. To espouse multiracialism is not evidence of love, but of the very opposite of it.  -Anthony Jacob

That is the crux of the matter. Diversity is based on the hatred of one’s own people, one’s own parents, wife, children, and grandchildren. A cousin of mine, on a recent visit, was waxing nostalgic about her parents, her grandparents, and the love that once was there when they were alive. She talked sadly of her nephew who had married outside his own race and wondered what was happening to the world. But then she tried to be a good American: “Oh well, I guess it’s all for the best, we have to adjust to progress.”

“Why must we adjust?” I asked her. “I have no intention of adjusting.”

Why should we adjust to Satandom? Shouldn’t real Europeans defy the devil and all his works? Diversity is just as Jacob described it: loathsome, sinister, and devilish. Instead of adjusting to it, we should oppose it with our whole heart and soul. But that is the conundrum: a man who has been singed with the fire from the cauldron of diversity does not have the heart or the soul to oppose diversity. “Breathes there a man with soul so dead…?” Unfortunately the modern displaced European is such a man. But things of the spirit are not subject to the strict biological laws of decay and death. In the realm of the spirit, that which is dead can come to life again. The liberals are Satan’s own, but the grazers are Satanists by assignment. They do what the liberals, particularly the liberal clergymen, tell them. Suppose a European with an ancient heart, a heart of flesh, came into Liberaldom and stood against the liberals and the barbarians of color, armed only with a faith in his people and their God? If the “fairy tales” of the Bible and the European people are true, the hero will prevail against the forces of hell. The essential thing in all fairy tales is that the hero must be pure of heart, and he must be willing to venture forth against mathematically impossible odds. I could cite the impossible military battles won by the Europeans of old, but let me cite the greatest battle they won. They turned Babylon into Christendom, because they loved their people so much they saw “His blood upon the rose.”

The greatest danger to the white race is not those enemies who come at us with swords in their hands. They must be resisted, but there is a far more subtle enemy than the violent savages of color. The most dangerous enemies are the conservatives and the liberals who urge the white man to survive by being absorbed into the races of color. Better to go down fighting to the last man, as Europeans with European souls, then to survive by becoming part of Babylon. A base, dishonorable survival in this world will lead to eternal damnation in the next. The refusal to become diverse is the best way to win against the forces of evil in this world and the only way to secure a place for ourselves in His Kingdom come. +