And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, Being forty days tempted of the devil. And in those days he did eat nothing: and when they were ended, he afterward hungered. And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread. And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God. And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
–Luke 4: 1-8
__________
Now that there is no longer any opposition to liberalism, the liberals have made explicit that which was always implicit in liberalism. They believe that every kind of violence – rape, assault, torture, and murder is licit so long as it is done to cleanse the republic of the impure. “We are against violence,” the liberals tell us, “unless it is violence against fascist racists.” But aren’t all white people fascist racists? Yes, they are, except the special Illuminati, who have transcended whiteness. So then we must conclude that the liberals mean to exterminate all the non-illuminated whites. And they are doing just that. This purge is a repeat performance. Robespierre was against capital punishment, except (there is always that exception) when capital punishment was used to cleanse the republic. The liberal Jacobins will never be satisfied until there are no white people left. They keep the grazers in line by letting them think that they can be part of the Illuminati. “Let the white South Africans perish, and let the white racists in every European nation be exterminated, what is that to me. I am not racist, I will be spared.” Such is the fantasy of the white grazer. The angelic liberals will put a mark on his door and he will be saved from death. But will he? No, he will not, nor in the end will the Illuminati themselves be saved from the black plague that they created to destroy the non-illuminated whites.
The liberals always sing hymns of joy every time a new wave of colored heathens enter a European nation, but does it ever occur to the liberals that their world, which is sustained by whites, will perish when the colored heathens replace the whites? No, that never does occur to the white liberals. Our reason is illuminated by what is in our hearts. The liberals’ hearts belong to Satan. There are no rational arguments that can make them denounce Satan. They support the colored heathens because the colored heathens are the human conduits to Satan. And conversely they hate the white race because whites once were, and could be again, the human conduits to Christ the Lord. It is the eternal battle of good vs. evil. The liberals have made their choice while the European grazers remain in limbo. In that comatose state they are easily manipulated by the devil.
The conservatives’ failure to understand the religious dynamic of liberalism has led us to a dismal swamp of futility. The conservatives continue to point out the irrationality of liberalism while the liberals continue to intensify their devotion to all things Satanic. The liberals do not see that their cushy government jobs will cease when there is a colored majority. The neo-con liberals do not see that an egalitarian army consisting of feminists and colored heathens cannot fight. Soon, and quite possibly now, we will no longer have an army that can defeat either Russia or China. (It wouldn’t be so bad if Russia took Alaska and the rest of the United States, but China is a different matter.) And then the neo-cons won’t be able to play with their paper soldier army anymore. And the feminists? There is no feminism in the cultures of the colored heathens. Since liberalism will be no more when Heathendom replaces Liberaldom, why not welcome the colored heathens into the white nations? We should not do that because we, the white remnant, are not heathens. White Christians should not desire to live in a black South Africa, an Islamic Britain, or the Aztec state of California. It is not an either/or proposition: reptilian liberalism or colored barbarism. The white European should reject both, but as long as the European people believe that liberalism and Christianity are compatible, they will continue to support white genocide in the hope that the liberal angel of death will pass them by.
The oft-quoted witticism, attributed to a whole host of wits, which suggests that a man who is not a liberal when he is young has no heart, but if he is still a liberal when he is old then he has no head, is, like all attempts to be clever rather than truthful, a very great lie. The lie contained in the immoral witticism is that liberals, even when they are in error as they are in their youthful, halcyon days, are still not in sin because their hearts are in the right place. And the conservatives, even when in later years their practical, cynical wisdom turns out to be closer to reality than that of the ‘idealistic’ liberals, are still considered evil because they have no humanity, they lack hearts. The deadly assumption underlying that ‘clever’ witticism is that liberals have good hearts. That is contrary to reality. Was the devil well-intended when he told Adam and Eve to defy God? Byron thought so and so did Gide and a whole host of European intellectuals, but the antique Europeans, as a whole, did not view the devil as the hero in the story of the Garden of Eden. And then we come to the French Revolution. Were the liberals, the Jacobins, really men and women who had their hearts in the right place? I would say that the Jacobins had hearts that belonged to the father of liberalism, Byron’s hero, and that those hearts were evil. But then I am a reactionary beyond the ken of liberal humanity. And that is my point. Shouldn’t we all, we Europeans, if we have any real humanity, be beyond the ken of liberal humanity?
The 20th century did produce men with no hearts. The theoretical conservatives in church and state were men who saw reason divorced from the human heart as the truth and the way. They fit neatly into the parameters of the previously mentioned witticism. But the real conservatives, men such as Edmund Burke and Anthony Jacob, did not divorce reason from their passions. They loved their people and used their reason to champion their people’s cause. Faith springs from a heart imbued with that charity of honor, it does not stem from the brains of the philosophers and theologians. “There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in our philosophies.” The liberals have hearts consecrated to the devil. He gives them the passion to strike out at God through their attack on the white race. How can we counter the liberals’ attack? We can eschew the conservatism of systems and embrace the conservatism of the heart, which is the conservatism of Ratty in The Wind in the Willows:
‘By it and with it and on it and in it,’ said the Rat. ‘It’s brother and sister to me, and aunts, and company, and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It’s my world, and I don’t want any other. What it hasn’t got is not worth having, and what it doesn’t know is not worth knowing. Lord! the times we’ve had together!
“Still our ancient foe, does seek to work us woe.” When we forget that, we lose the war against Satan and his minions. Our “ancient foe” cannot be defeated by reason divorced from the heart. Chateaubriand’s observations on the fall of man should be heeded:
Observe, too, what is very important: man had it in his power to destroy the harmony of his being in two ways, either by wanting to love too much, or to know too much. He transgressed in the second way; for we are, in fact, far more deeply tinctured with the pride of science than with the pride of love; the latter would have deserved pity rather than punishment, and if Adam had been guilty of desiring to feel rather than to know too much, man himself might, perhaps, have been able to expiate his transgression, and the Son of God would not have been obliged to undertake so painful a sacrifice. But the case was different. Adam sought to embrace the universe, not with the sentiments of his heart, but with the power of thought, and, advancing to the tree of knowledge, he admitted into his mind a ray of light that overpowered it. The equilibrium was instantaneously destroyed, and confusion took possession of man. Instead of that illumination which he had promised himself, a thick darkness overcast his sight, and his guilt, like a veil, spread out between him and the universe. His whole soul was agitated and in commotion; the passions rose up against the judgment, the judgment strove to annihilate the passions, and in this terrible storm the rock of death witnessed with joy the first of shipwrecks. -The Genius of Christianity
The European intellectuals were so impressed with their God-given reason that they decided to go it alone. They gave an intellectual assent to God, but they no longer were attached to God, they no longer had a heart to heart connection to the living God, because they thought that their reason had made such a connection unnecessary. And that pride of reason leads to liberalism, because it creates a void in the human heart that must be filled. Just as communism is a derivative of capitalism, so is liberalism a derivative of intellectual Christianity. We must have a faith that touches our hearts. If we give only an intellectual assent to God and the things of God, without giving Him our hearts, we will either become liberals, who have given themselves over to Satan, or we will be defeated by the liberals because we haven’t the heart to fight them.
If we can believe the Gospel accounts, and why should we question them, we see that Christ wanted something more from his followers than mere intellectual acceptance of His divine status. He wanted their love: “Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?” Christina Rossetti speaks for our people when she asks: “What can I give him?” And then she answers her own question: “Give my heart.” It is striking how often St. Paul stresses that one great theme – we must give Him our hearts. If we don’t love much, if our reason is not illuminated by Him, then we will fall prey to the devil who prowls about the world seeking the ruin of souls. Liberalism is an all devouring hellhound who does the work of his master. With an unerring instinct, that hellhound attacks whatever connects mankind to the living God. And it is the purveyors of ‘go it alone’ intellectual Christianity that have left us defenseless against the hound of hell, which is liberalism.
The question that Thomas Hughes poses in Tom Brown at Oxford when his hero is confronted with a choice between Socrates or St. Paul is, “Shall we be heathens or Christians?” St. Paul’s way is the way of our people, the way of hearts that loved much. There is a great dichotomy between St. Paul’s faith and the faith of the theologians that followed him. There is no dichotomy between St. Paul’s faith and the antique Europeans’ storybook faith in the Man of Sorrows who redeems us from sin and death. Why did we reject the romance of the Christ story and replace it with a philosophy called Christianity? It is always that “pride of science” that keeps us from the living God. Intellectual Christianity is Socratic Christianity; its adherents gather around the first circle of hell, clinging to that first rung while trying to convince themselves that reason alone will keep them from falling deeper into the pit.
The liberals use the barrier of race to keep the intellectual Christians from approaching the living God. If white pietas is evil, if it is the unpardonable sin, then the Pauline Europeans who loved much were wrong. Then St. Paul was wrong about the wisdom of the circumcised heart, and Christ was wrong when He asked Peter, “Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?” He should have told Peter to “Go and think about God, get your act together intellectually, and come back to me then.” The devils that went over the cliff with the swine knew who Christ was, and they feared and loathed Him. Likewise the liberals: they know in their satanic hearts that they must destroy the white race in order to attack Him whom they hate. White pietas, which leads the European to Christ, must die so that Satan can reign on earth as he reigns in hell. Standing against that hellish, reptilian vision of utopia is the European remnant, the people who believe as the antique Europeans believed, that His kingdom come lives in hearts that love much, and His will shall be done by those same loving hearts. +