I call a commonwealth Regicide, which lays it down as a fixed law of nature, and a fundamental right of man, that all government, not being a democracy, is an usurpation; that all Kings, as such, are usurpers, and for being Kings, may and ought to be put to death, with their wives, families, and adherents. The commonwealth which acts uniformly upon those principles; and which after abolishing every festival of religion, chooses the most flagrant act of a murderous Regicide treason for a feast of eternal commemoration, and which forces all her people to observe itâthis I call Regicide by establishment. âEdmund Burke, Letters on a Regicide Peace
_______________
Now before the feast of the passover, when Jesus knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end. –John 13: 1
________________
Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all. But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews? Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber. â John 19: 38-40
___________________________________
No French king, not even Louis the XIV, was as bloodthirsty or tyrannical as Robespierre. No Russian Czar was anywhere near as bloodthirsty and tyrannical as Lenin and Stalin. No British monarch ever taxed the American people like the native-grown democratic government taxed them. No war in the non-democratic age of Europe was ever as bloody and terrible as the American Civil War and World Wars I and II. And no white South African president ever called for the liquidation of the blacks of South Africa, nor did the white South Africans allow blacks to slaughter other blacks as well as whites. But the liberals of the West wanted democracy in South Africa. Then, and only then, did we witness bloody barbarism on an epic scale. Democracy is Satanâs form of government. Through that system of government he has imposed his will on the European people. What is Satanâs will? His will is that the European people shall be eradicated from the face of the earth. And his will shall prevail unless the white grazers have a crisis of faith and cease to believe in democracy.
All evils under the sun have been and still are sanctioned under the guise of democracy. To put it simply â democracy means the majority can tyrannize over the minority. In reality, under our modern system of elections, a majority of a tiny segment of voters end up tyrannizing over the majority of non-voters. But even if everyone voted, the immorality of democracy would remain â the majority decide what is right, and they inflict their decision on the minority. And when the majority is liberal — and that is the reality in the Western European nations — or when the majority are black, as in South Africa, the ruling majority imposes a satanic rule on the minority. Prior to their approval of the 1992 referendum ending apartheid, the South African whites had the last European government, in that it was not democratic, on the face of the earth.
Why is democracy coupled with Christianity when there has never been a Christian democracy? Democracy gives a quasi-divinity to the rule of Satan, which renders white grazers, who have been stripped of their Christian faith, morally anesthetized, completely incapable of resisting any edict stemming from a democratically elected government. The democratically elected government of South Africa announces that it is going to confiscate the land and â letâs state the obvious â kill the white South Africans. And no one in the West objects. In fact, Theresa May says it is fine so long as it is done lawfully. What does she mean by lawfully? She means democratically, which translates to âWe must do what Satan wills.â No, we must not do what Satan wills, we must do what Christ wills. And Christ does not will that we should cede the world to Satan even if Satan wins every election in the world. Fitzhugh warns us that a government is only beneficial when the government body is conservative. (1) When liberals and/or negroes govern, white Christians should rebel, because the government is not conserving that which is essential to conserve — the white, Christ-bearing race. Leaders such as Angela Merkel and that German councilwoman who openly countenance the Islamification of white Germany would not be tolerated for one second if the German people, like all of the European people, were not under the thralldom of democracy. âFit to govern? Not fit to live!â should be the white Christianâs response to liberal leaders such as Merkel and May.
I often hear that we should look to Russia or to Hungary as exemplars of democracies that work. No, no, a thousand times, no! What is good in modern Russia and modern Hungary is that their leaders are still mindful of their nationsâ non-democratic Christian past. When Putin opposes homosexual marriage and agrees to take in white South African farmers, he is doing what Nicholas II would have done. He is acting like a non-democratic Christian leader. When OrbĂĄn resists the Islamization of Hungary, he too is acting like a Christian ruler from old Hungary. But if the Russians and the Hungarians continue on the democratic road they too will end up in the slough of despair, which is where all who follow the democratic way end up.
We must never forget that the Jews (âGive us Barabbas!â) democratically voted to crucify Christ. Nothing has changed since that exercise in democracy. Whenever democracy is the ruling faith, the Christ-bearing people are crucified, and Christ, who suffers with His people, is crucified anew. In Jacobin France, communist Russia, democratic Europe, and the democratic United States, it was the implementation of democratic principles that led to the dethronement of Christ and the destruction of the European people. Once you institute âone man, one vote,â you have given Satan the power to govern, because the colored heathens, who outnumber the whites, will always support that which is anti-Christian and anti-white. This is why the liberals in the European nations will never place any restrictions on colored immigration. They shall not rest till there are no whites, except themselves, left in the formerly white nations. They too will perish as the colored heathens do not love the liberals as the liberals think they do, but before the liberal de Klerks perish, the white grazers will already have been led to the slaughter by their democratic leaders.
Democracy is always ushered in with the cry of liberty, equality, and fraternity, but what democracy brings is tyranny. None of the ties that bind us to humanity, and through our humanity to the humane God, can survive when they are democratized. Our family ties cannot be democratized and still survive, nor can we permit our white Christian culture to be democratized out of existence because the colored heathens and the liberals have no use for it.
And that is the crux of the whole matter. Are we going to consent to the murder of the European people and the destruction of every last vestige of Christian Europe because the liberals have decided to destroy them âlawfullyâ and democratically? Democracy as practiced by the demon whites of modern Europe has its roots in Christian theology. First the Roman Catholic theologians and then the Protestant theologians felt it was easier to advance the cause of Christ if He, our Lord and Savior, was placed in a closed box that men could only obtain access to through a complicated system. The system became the important thing while Christ faded away. The systematizing of God in the churches led to the systematizing of man in society, through the democratic process. At the time of the French Revolution, the French clergy did not care if their charges were atheists so long as they didnât become Protestants. That lack of concern for what is inside of a man, so long as he adheres to the rules of the system, always leads to the dissolution of real faith and leaves a man open to treasons, stratagems, and spoils.
Some years back when John Paul II was spewing out blasphemies from the Papal throne, I received a letter from a Catholic apologist who was trying to win Roman Catholics who had converted to Protestant fundamentalism back to the fold. Wouldnât I help him win those fundamentalists back to the true faith? I sent a letter to the zealous apologist stating that what I wanted to see were more Christians in the world, and it seemed to me that the converts to fundamentalism had more of the real Christianity in them than John Paul II or any of my fellow Roman Catholics. Needless to say I never heard back from that gentleman. I do not want to enter into partisan religious controversies here. The point is that our Lord sent us a Comforter, the Holy Ghost, and St. Paul enjoined us to circumcise our hearts so that we could come to know the Savior. Why then do Christians cling to their systems about God rather than the living God who enters human hearts?
Secular democracy is a logical consequence of intellectual Christianity which gives us a system instead of Christ the Lord. I can only conclude that it is the cross of Christ that has made systems, religious and secular, more appealing to the European people than the Christ-centered faith of St. Paul and the antique Europeans, because the systems promise us Christianity without the cross. But the systems in the church have failed, and the democratic governments have failed. Isnât it time to look back to old Europe and see what they saw when they accepted their cross and loved Christ in and through their kith and kin?
Twentieth century conservatives were not conservative, because they did not want to conserve the European people and their ancient faith. They wanted to conserve the democratic system which is the other side of the Marxist coin. Hegel saw the thesis and the anti-thesis going on forever, but Marx put an amen to that process. Once âthe peopleâ came into their own, history was at an end. You canât oppose a government of the people, because âthe peopleâ are the government; they are the end of the thesis and anti-thesis process. That is the Jacobin, Marxist, democratic system. By the late 20th century and through the 21st century, the liberals have clung to that view of âthe people,â with one significant change. Now âthe peopleâ are the colored races only; whites cannot be âthe people.â That ideology has turned the liberals into mystics. They are currently, en masse, involved in a Gnostic leap of faith. They believe that they can transfer their minds into the bodies of the colored heathens and live their lives through the colored races. If you look at the passion with which the liberals involve themselves with the non-white races, particularly the black race, you can see the Gnostic transformation at work. The white grazer does not believe in the Gnostic transformation with the passion of the mad dog liberal, but he does believe in democracy, which the liberals invoke whenever the grazer starts to question the negro-worshipping premises of liberalism. Which brings us back to the question that will determine the destiny of the white race. Will the European people ever have a crisis of faith, will they ever cease to believe in democracy?
It doesnât appear that the European people will forsake democracy. The church organizations, which are hostile to Christ and the European people, keep telling the European people that democracy and Christianity are one. (When John Paul II went to South America back when Pinochet ruled in Chile, he visited all the left-leaning democracies but refused to visit Pinochetâs non-democratic, Christian dictatorship.) Possibly when the Western democracies can no longer deliver the material goods, the white grazers will lose faith in the democratic system. But I do not put much store in movements that stem from mere materialism. Without a spiritual impetus such revolts become mere anarchy, everymanâs hand against everyman. The European people must look at the fruits of democracy â abortion, homosexual marriage, and negro worship â all bound together by a merciless cruelty, and then they must have an internal conversion to the Light of the World. Is that likely? No, it is not. I certainly donât see any signs that the Europeans are going to break their democratic chains. But we are not going to be vouchsafed a material sign. Christ still seeks to enter human hearts, He is the sign that a European clings to in the democratic era, which is the satanic era of the European peopleâs history. Satanâs era shall not be the last era — that is our hope and our faith. Our Lord speaks to us still even in the darkness of the 21st century: âThese things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation; but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.â +
______________________
(1) All government proceeds ab extra. Neither individuals nor societies can govern themselves, any more than the mouse can live in the exhausted receiver, or the clown lift himself by the lapel of his pantaloons. The South is governed by the necessity of keeping its negroes in order, which preserves a healthy conservative public opinion. Had the negroes votes, the necessity would be removed, because the interest of the governing class would cease to be conservative. âGeorge Fitzhugh, Cannibals All! Or Slaves Without Masters