Men are rarely without some sympathy in the sufferings of others; but in the immense and diversified mass of human misery, which may be pitied, but cannot be relieved, in the gross, the mind must make a choice. Our sympathy is always more forcibly attracted towards the misfortunes of certain persons, and in certain descriptions: and this sympathetic attraction discovers, beyond a possibility of mistake, our mental affinities, and elective affections. –Edmund Burke
But king Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites; Of the nations concerning which the LORD said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you: for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods: Solomon clave unto these in love. And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines: and his wives turned away his heart. For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father. For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. And Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father. I Kings 11: 1-6
My elective affections are not with the police as a generic aggregate. Quite the contrary — when the laws of your nation are satanic, the police, nine times out of ten, will be at odds with white Europeans. But my elective affections always go out to the white police officers who have maimed or killed black criminals who were resisting arrest. Going all the way back to the Rodney King arrest, I have only heard of one instance in which I thought the white officer was in the wrong when dealing with a black criminal. That one instance was the female officer’s accidental use of a gun instead of a taser. And even in that case it was criminal negligence, not murder.
The moderate liberals, the conservatives who support the police in the aggregate, always end up selling out the white policemen who actually try to do real police work by arresting black criminals. Lou Dobbs, for example, who used to be a conservative on Fox News before Fox News went over to mad-dog liberalism, immediately, before any facts in the case came out, condemned Derek Chauvin as a murderer. And so it is with all the white conservatives. They condemn the white policemen who maim or kill black criminals such as Jacob Blake or George Floyd while lauding the “99% of good officers” who do not maim or kill black criminals. But let me insist on something that should be so obvious I shouldn’t have to say it – There is no such thing as an immaculate arrest when the man or woman being arrested resists arrest. Immaculate arrests only take place when there is no resistance to the arrest. When criminals resist arrest, the police must use force. That is why we call it, in the aggregate, a police force. The vast majority of violent crimes in our nation are committed by blacks. If the police cannot use force to arrest blacks, of what use are our police forces? They are of no use, they are harmful; after the lynching of Derek Chauvin it has become abundantly clear that the police will only be allowed to arrest whites. So why should whites support ‘our police’ who are not our police? We live in a police state, but the real state police are Antifa and Black Lives Matter. They are the liberals’ storm troopers.
When the liberals decided to dispose of Trump as president, they used their storm troopers to ensure there would be no opposition to the fraudulent election. (1) When the liberals wanted a guilty verdict against Derek Chauvin to ensure that there will never be any opposition to the liberals’ religion, the worship of the sacred negro, they called upon their storm troopers again. The reason the liberals use violence is because violence works. The moderate liberals who call themselves conservative can be “used for wrong, but are useless for right” because they will not fight liberalism so long as the liberals hold to the worship of the sacred negro. They all, from Trump on down to the rank and file white grazers, are afraid of being racist. Nothing good will come from any conservative group, and there are always new ones starting up, which does not make the restoration of white pietas and the dismantling of negro worship its primary purpose.
The liberals have a blood faith: they believe in the sacred blood of the negro. Through him, they commune with their god, who is Satan. The white grazers do not have a blood faith; their clergymen have told them that a blood faith is forbidden to whites. But men must have a blood faith, so the white grazers do what Solomon did when he destroyed the Kingdom of Israel – they go whoring after foreign gods. In the Catholic Church, they blend Islam, Buddhism, Judaism, the rain forest gods, and the sacred negro into a Christ-hating Christianity. And the evangelicals blend Judaism and negro worship into a Christ-neutralizing religion. Behind the white whore-mongering, the desire for non-Christian gods, is the prohibition in the white ‘Christian’ churches against a blood faith. Scott describes in The Lay of the Last Minstrel a man who does not have a racial and familial hearth fire:
Breathes there the man, with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
Whose heart hath ne’er within him burn’d,
As home his footsteps he hath turn’d
From wandering on a foreign strand!
If such there breathe, go, mark him well;
For him no Minstrel raptures swell;
High though his titles, proud his name,
Boundless his wealth as wish can claim;—
Despite those titles, power, and pelf,
The wretch, concentred all in self,
Living, shall forfeit fair renown,
And, doubly dying, shall go down
To the vile dust, from whence he sprung,
Unwept, unhonour’d, and unsung.
Our homeland is our race and our faith. We cannot love in the aggregate. If we are not allowed to say, “these are my people and Christ is the God of my people,” we will go whoring after other people and other gods. We will love the sacred negro, we will love the Jews, we will love the Moslems, while we denounce our own people and our God because they are ‘racist.’
What Allen Tate stated straight out, that the problems caused by rationalism could be cured by rationalism, was implicit in all the ‘death of the West’ books published in the 20th century. From Spengler through Weaver, the basic assumption of the conservative thinkers was that the Europeans could find a magical, rational talisman that would save them from their downward spiral to oblivion. But there is no such magic talisman; just as the alchemists were never able to transform base metal into gold, so were the rationalists unable to dispose of the God who comes to human hearts and replace Him with the God who comes to illuminated minds, without creating a rift between God and man. “Man proposes, man disposes,” has replaced, “man proposes, God disposes.” The living God cannot and will not bend His will to man’s will, because man’s will, divorced from the heart of God, becomes Satan’s will. (2)
A few years back, the blog called the Daily Kenn showed a horrific video of a bunch of noble black savages watching another noble black savage drown. They made no attempt to save the poor man because contrary to the liberals’ narrative, the noble black savages are not noble. They don’t care for George Floyd or any other black man shot by white police, they care about black power; hence they riot when the police act against black criminals. The more they riot, the more timid the police, who work for the liberals, become. The blacks do not understand why the liberals worship them, but they do understand that the liberals will cede everything to them so long as they keep screaming ‘racist.’ And they shall continue to murder, rape, and burn so long as whites have souls so dead that they will not fight for their own people.
Let us place an unilluminated white in that same body of water where the black drowned, much to the delight of his fellow noble savages. The liberals stand by on the shore and push the white victim back into the water while shouting, “Racist!” at him. The creatures of color throw things at him while they laugh and scream, “Drown, whitey, drown!” And what do the moderate liberals, the conservatives, do? They hold a meeting of the minds. One pundit says, “I think he is guilty of racism, we had better let him drown. If we don’t, the liberals will say we are racist.” Another ‘conservative’ – I believe it was Amy Coney Barrett – says, “There might be riots if we try to save him, and besides, I am very busy doing my devotions to George Floyd, so we must – it is a moral imperative – let him drown.” As the drowning white man tries, for the 20th time, to pull himself to the shore, Amy, assisted by Father Moderate Christian, steps on his fingers and pushes him back into the water. One conservative pundit is somewhat troubled by Father Moderate Christian’s actions: “Father, why are you pushing him back into the lake to be drowned? Isn’t it incumbent on us as Christians to try to save him?” Father Moderate Christian replies, “I think we must see the larger picture here. It is better that one man should die than the church of Christ should be deemed racist.” The conservative pundit replies, “Yes, I understand. But I still think we should meet here again next week to discuss the need for guard rails around the lake. After all, a black might drown in the lake, and that would be disastrous.” “Yes, I agree,” says the treacherous Amy Coney Barrett, “We must keep the blacks from drowning in the lake.” So the unilluminated white drowns, to the unmitigated glee of the liberals and the noble black savages, and with the passive, self-serving approval of the moral cowards, the moderate liberals.
“Behold, I show you a mystery.” It is through our mysterious human relationships with our kith and kin that we come to an understanding of the mystery of Christ’s incarnation, His divine condescension on the cross, and His resurrection from the dead. If we shun those human relationships, we shall never understand the God who took flesh and dwelt among us. Why have our churchmen allowed the liberals to co-opt the term ‘humane’? Why is the worship of the ignoble black savages who have no humanity considered the beginning and the end of the Christian faith? If Christ is indeed the God-Man shouldn’t we know Him through what is good, what is noble, and what is humane? The liberals’ devotion to the sacred negro allows them to love what is evil, what is ignoble, and what is inhumane. Francis William Bourdillon expressed all this quite well:
The mind has a thousand eyes,
And the heart but one;
Yet the light of a whole life dies
When love is done.
Satan rides triumphant throughout the European nations because the European grazers have been seduced by abstract reason, which has a thousand eyes for that which is evil but no heart for the divine love which passeth the understanding of abstract reason. Philosophical, theological Christianity tells us that we need not climb to the top of the mystical mountain nor go through the dark and foreboding wood in order to encounter and defeat the fire-breathing dragon. Instead, the great minds tell us we need only steep ourselves in superficiality, in Emersonian platitudes, which always tell us that we must love the sacred negro with our whole heart, mind, and soul. Is it just a coincidence that our churchmen have come up with the same theology as the secular liberals? No, it is no coincidence, because when you forsake your people, “love is done,” and you will seek to renew what you have lost through the heathens of color. It can’t be done; how can we be united with the Divine Love when we cling to the noble black savage as our god?
Solzhenitsyn once observed that the most striking thing about the West was the decline of courage. What causes a decline in courage? I think the cause lies in the human heart. When a man has nothing he loves enough to fight for, when his kith and kin are not his people but are instead part of the large aggregate called humanity, a man will become fearful of displeasing the principalities and powers of this world, and he will embrace Satan because Satan is seemingly more powerful than Christ. (3) The Supreme Court justices who refused to hear the fraudulent election cases feared the wrath of Antifa and Black Lives Matter. And so did and does Trump fear the BLM/Antifa creatures from hell. And likewise the judge and jury who convicted Derek Chauvin. They all are white Undines who fear their own shadows because their shadows might reveal their white features. They have gone beyond love and hate to that statistical world of universal humanity, in which there is no such thing as “my own people,” there is only the sacred negro who inspires the Europeans to… What does the sacred negro inspire the Europeans to do? He inspires them to hate their own and court favor with the wicked. It is of eternal moment, it is all in all, that the wicked, the liberals and their colored minions, shall not root out the image of God in man from the face of the earth. If we love much, if we love our people in and through Christ, we will still have hope, because we will see His image in man: “And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us.” +
The faction is the evil spirit that possesses the body of France; that informs it as a soul; that stamps upon it’s ambition, and upon all it’s pursuits, a characteristic mark, which strongly distinguishes them from the same general passions, and the same general views, in other men and in other communities. It is that spirit which inspires into them a new, a pernicious, and desolating activity. Constituted as France was ten years ago, it was not in that France to shake, to shatter, and to overwhelm Europe in the manner that we behold. A sure destruction impends over those infatuated Princes, who, in the conflict with this new and unheard-of power, proceed as if they were engaged in a war that bore a resemblance to their former contests; or that they can make peace in the spirit of their former arrangements or pacification. Here the beaten path is the very reverse of the safe road. –Burke
(2) The liberals have the clarity and determination to carry the day because they have committed, heart and soul, to Satan. The white grazers do not have a clear commitment to God or the devil. Hence they are cannon fodder for the liberals:
It is a dreadful truth, but it is a truth that cannot be concealed; in ability, in dexterity, in the distinctness of their views, the Jacobins are our superiors. They saw the thing right from the very beginning. Whatever were the first motives to the war among politicians, they saw that it is in it’s spirit, and for it’s objects, a civil war; and as such they pursued it. It is a war between the partizans of the ancient, civil, moral, and political order of Europe against a sect of fanatical and ambitious atheists which means to change them all. -Burke
Such is the war that the moderate liberals will not fight – a war against “a sect of fanatical and ambitious atheists which means to change them all.”
(3) Only one apostle had the courage to stand by our Lord and Savior at the foot of the cross, when it appeared that the principalities and powers of this world had triumphed over Him. That apostle was John, the same apostle who laid his head on Christ’s sacred heart at the last supper. “Perfect love casteth out fear.”