You do me wrong to take me out oâ thâ grave.
Thou art a soul in bliss; but I am bound
Upon a wheel of fire, that mine own tears
Do scald like molten lead
–King Lear
There is a certain practical wisdom in many of the old adages such as, âA stitch in time saves nine,â and, âYou can lead a horse to water but you canât make it drink.â But some old adages are wrong. For instance, letâs take the old adage that I heard ad nauseum in my childhood, âSticks and stones can break your bones, but names can never hurt you.â Oh really? The slanderous word can and does hurt more than sticks and stones. Just look at what the word âracistâ has accomplished for the liberals. It has brought about the destruction of a civilization and created the most satanic non-civilization the world has ever seen.
All governing bodies, if they are truly governing bodies, must restrict free speech. If they allow the customs, manners, and morals upon which their authority to rule is based to become the constant subject for ridicule and contempt they will soon cease to be a governing body. Louis XVI did not lose his crown and his life because he was too oppressive and didnât allow free speech, he lost his crown and his life because he did not suppress free speech. He let the pamphleteers in the press and the academy run wild with their criticisms of the customs, manners, and morals that were the foundations of the French monarchy, while refusing to suppress the Jacobinâs advocacy of liberty, fraternity, and equality as alternatives to the French monarchy.
Before the French Revolution the American Jacobins â Jefferson, Franklin, and Madison â engineered their own revolution. Prior to our âgloriousâ union of atheist states under the mantle of the Constitution, every single state had a denominational, Christian state religion. This is the way it must be. You cannot have a governing body that governs according to some abstract theory separate and apart from the religious faith of the people of the nation. But that is precisely what the American constitutionalists set out to do. They told their people that, âYour religion and the customs, manners, and morals that go with that religion are a private thing. What you must adhere to as your rule of law is a vague belief in the will of the people as determined by democratic procedures implemented by enlightened minds.â
So America — and all of Europe eventually followed America â became a nation governed by the principle of benign, religious indifference. âWe wonât be Christian, but we will still be moral and virtuous.â But if the moral foundation of your nation is no longer the Christian faith of Alfred the Great, what is the moral foundation of your nation? Can âWhat is truth?â be a ruling principle? If we reject Christ, what ârough beastâ will become our religious truth? The people, as defined by the Illuminati, are the ruling authority of the European nations. And who are âthe peopleâ? The noble black savage is the God of the descending race of the European un-men who once worshipped Jesus Christ.
The reason why the rulers of America did not suppress the 1960âs Phil Donohue Show-type of free speech â âWhy not abortion? Why not gay-lesbian rights?â etc. â was because there was no moral consensus against such things. Every society has certain boundaries that cannot be transgressed; you are not permitted to engage in âfree speechâ on those boundary topics. For instance, the sanctity of the noble black savage cannot be challenged in our society because the noble black savage is the sum total of the European peopleâs faith. The belief in Christâs resurrection from the dead and the civilization that was based on that belief can be challenged and spit upon. That tells us all we need to know about our anti-civilization and its rulers.
The liberals are not morally correct in any of their policies because liberalism is satanic, but the liberals are strategically correct. They should, now that they have absolute power, crack down on all free speech in order to retain their power. Why should they permit the slightest criticism of their regime? Who do they have to answer to? The churches? Certainly not, the churches are in the liberalsâ back pocket. The white peasantry? Again the answer is no. There is no white peasantry. The Gnostic non-faith of the modern European people started in the churches, spread to the academy, and then was handed down to the masses. That new faith has killed the white peasantry. There are no integral white men left who will venture forth against the liberal leviathan, armed only with faith in Christ and Davidâs slingshot. Instead, white men with slide rules and calculators try to prove that it is illogical for liberals to destroy the white race.
The new liberal purges on the social media platforms of everyone to the right of Jane Fonda are happening because of the upcoming presidential election. The liberals donât want a repeat of the last presidential election. Why donât they just ban elections? They will ban elections in the near future if they donât get the results they want. In the past they allowed elections to take place because the elections helped to perpetuate the myth that the people, not a liberal oligarchy, rule the nation. We all know the myth of the historical dialectic of the thesis and the anti-thesis, which is brought to a close when the people, whether they are the communists or the democratic Europeans, become the final synthesis. But the liberals will not continue with the subterfuge if they do not get the electoral results they want. If too many whites vote white, they will lose their voting rights. And they will lose their voting rights because whites are not considered to be âthe people,â and only âthe peopleâ have rights.
Itâs important to note that the liberals do not have to supply a reason for their suppression of whites. They might call the offending white a white supremacist, a hater, or an advocate of violence. All those âreasonsâ are just subterfuges. The liberals are on a mission to build the kingdom of hell on earth, so they must crush all opposition to their regime. That is why it is futile for whites to seek fair play from the liberals. They are not committed to fair play or to any other outmoded ethical standard from the white era of the Europeansâ history. This is the new era, in which malice and hatred bear down truth and mercy. There is nothing benign in religious indifference, because people must have a religion. If they wonât have Christ, then they will be forced to worship the libearlsâ savage gods of color.
The classical liberals, who are now called conservatives, are forever trying to seek redemption from the devil because they are proceeding according to the spiritual agenda of Dostoyevskyâs Grand Inquisitor, who bids us look to a man-made system rather than to the living God. âChristâs plan for man, to the extent that we can understand it, is inefficient and impractical.â That is the substance of the Grand Inquisitorâs complaint against God. âYou thought too much of men, they canât handle their freedom. We gave them something better, we gave them a system.â The democratic system has become, for the white man, like unto the theological refuge that the Grand Inquisitors of Christian Jewry gave their parishioners. It is the armor that David rejected. But the systems, in church and state, are the devilâs snares. We have become thoroughly enmeshed in systems and lack the strength, which only comes from a faith in someone greater than the systems, to extradite ourselves from the devilâs snares.
The undergirding of the liberalsâ new faith is the belief, articulated by men such as Rousseau, Diderot, Einstein, and Shaw, that the Christian faith belongs to that intermediary stage of human evolution, one step above the totem and taboo stage of mankindâs history, but well below the level of scientific man, whose religion is cosmic and intellectual in contrast to Christianity, which is provincial and stupid. But it is a curious thing â why does the âhigherâ religion return us to the totem and taboo religion in which we bow down before the sacred negro?
At some point the European, if he is ever going to reclaim his spiritual manhood, must deal with the question of science. Can we believe, against the evidence of science, that Christ rose from the dead? If we canât believe in that miracle then we must submit to the dictates of the men of science who bid us worship the man-gods, because there is no God-Man.
Burke in his opposition to the French Revolution articulated the alternative to the cosmic religion of humanity. He saw the old religion and its attendant code of ethics as the only religion for the European people. The new religion of humanity was a false religion without honor and without charity.
We know, and it is our pride to know, that man is by his constitution a religious animal; that atheism is against, not only our reason, but our instincts; and that it cannot prevail long. But if, in the moment of riot, and in a drunken delirium from the hot spirit drawn out of the alembic of hell, which in France is now so furiously boiling, we should uncover our nakedness, by throwing off that Christian religion which has hitherto been our boast and comfort, and one great source of civilization amongst us, and amongst many other nations, we are apprehensive (being well aware that the mind will not endure a void) that some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition might take place of it. â Reflections on the Revolution in France
And what is that uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition that has taken the place of the European peopleâs faith in Christ? You know what it is, because the liberals have taught us our catechism. âYou shall love the sacred negro with all your heart, mind, and soul, and you shall hate the white man with all your heart, mind, and soul.â What is a white supremacist? We are never told exactly what that entity is, but those two words have the power to destroy the white race. Why do those words and the other word, racist, have the power to destroy us? They have that power because the Europeans have given liberals the power to destroy them with the devil words. If a man does not believe in the Word made flesh, he will be the slave of the devil words of the liberals. White men now spend their entire lives on this earth trying to prove that they are not racists, that they are not white supremacists, but they can never get out from under the racist-white supremacist label because when the libearls invoke those words, they mean whatever the liberals want them to mean, and they apply to any white man who impedes the liberals onward and upward march to utopia.
No appeal to the liberalsâ sense of justice or their mercy will avail the white man who has fallen into their clutches. There is no justice in the liberalsâ courts and no mercy in the liberalsâ hearts of stone. They will follow the logic of liberalism to its ultimate conclusion. All non-illuminated whites â thee and me â must die for the sin of racism/white supremacism. Only when the white man stands up to the men with the devil words and refuses to be ashamed of white pietas will there be any relief for the whites living in the midst of liberal Babylon. Until that time the liberals will rule Liberaldom through the power of the devil words. Would the Europeans be afraid of those words if they had hearts of flesh? If they loved their God and their people, they would be fearless in defense of their God and their people. Perfect love casteth out fear. The love that once was there must once again become the animating spirit of the European people. But what are the chances that the European people can be stirred from within? Are they capable of seeing His blood upon the rose? It doesnât appear so. There was still, in the latter half of the 20th century, a slight ethical remnant of the Christian faith left in the European people. But now even that ethical remnant has been destroyed. The love that once was there, for kith, kin, and God has been replaced by a hatred for kith, kin, and God. Through the power of his words â racism and white supremacy â Satan has severed the white European from Christ and His people. In the face of our death and the death of our loved ones we can only hold onto His promise that He has conquered death. So it is with the death of our civilization. We can only hold onto His promise that He will be with us always even in the face of death. Nothing eternal perishes! And the bond forged by the European people with Christ the Lord is an eternal bond that will sustain us in life and death so long as we refuse to sever that bond by adhering to the words of the devil instead of His holy word. +