Where Two or Three Are Gathered Together

“No, I suppose that other world must be all a dream.”

“There never was such a world,” said the Witch.

“No,” said Jill and Scrubb, “never was such a world.”

“There never was any world but mine,” said the Witch.

“There never was any world but yours,” said they.

Puddleglum was still fighting hard. “I don’t know rightly what you all mean by a world,” he said, talking like a man who hasn’t enough air. “But you can play that fiddle till your fingers drop off, and still you won’t make me forget Narnia; and the whole Overworld too. We’ll never see it again, I shouldn’t wonder. You may have blotted it out and turned it dark like this, for all I know. Nothing more likely. But I know I was there once. I’ve seen the sky full of stars. I’ve seen the sun coming up out of the sea of a morning and sinking behind the mountains at night. And I’ve seen him up in the midday sky when I couldn’t look at him for brightness.”

Puddleglum’s words had a very rousing effect. The other three all breathed again and looked at one another like people newly awaked.

“Why, there it is!” cried the Prince. “Of course! The blessing of Aslan upon this honest Marshwiggle. We have all been dreaming, these last few minutes. How could we have forgotten it? Of course we’ve all seen the sun.”

–The Silver Chair

__________

In order for a revolution to succeed, there must be a certain degree of passivity in the governing body responsible for preventing revolutions. The French Revolution was the classic example. The popular press, the pamphleteers, had made an impression upon Louis XVI; he thought that he could concede a few points to the Jacobins. But you can never cede anything to the devil. The king’s failure to see that the Jacobins were from the devil made him compromise when he should have stood firm.

The indulgence of a sort of undefined hope, an obscure confidence, that some lurking remains of virtue, some degree of shame, might exist in the breasts of the oppressors of France, has been among the causes which have helped to bring on the common ruin of king and people. There is no safety for honest men, but by believing all possible evil of evil men, and by acting with promptitude, decision, and steadiness on that belief. I well remember, at every epocha of this wonderful history, in every scene of this tragic business, that when your sophistic usurpers were laying down mischievous principles, and even applying them in direct resolutions, it was the fashion to say, that they never intended to execute those declarations in their rigour. This made men cautious to their opposition, and remiss in early precaution. By holding out this fallacious hope, the impostors deluded sometimes one description of men, and sometimes another, so that no means of resistance were provided against them, when they came to execute in cruelty what they had planned in fraud.

– Burke in A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly

Louis XVI’s failure has been the failure of the West: We have failed to see the devil’s sneering face behind the façade of liberalism. And the primary cover of the devil’s agenda has been ‘racism.’ Trotsky coined the concept to neutralize the white race, and that terrible bogeyman has kept the white race in perpetual fear and self-loathing for over a century. Whites are willingly going to the liberals’ guillotine because they have come to believe that racism is the only unpardonable sin. They believe their ancestors were guilty of that unpardonable sin and they must atone for it. But how can you atone for an unpardonable sin? You can’t, but you can damn your ancestors. You can vow to have nothing to do with their legacy and you can spend your entire life as a sign of contradiction to old Europe. You can propitiate the colored gods by following the dictates of the high priests of the revolutionary tribunal. What gives the liberals the right to rule? Are they not white ‘racists’ just like thee and me? The liberals rule because they are the non-racist elect; they have made a Gnostic transformation and become pure spirit. And as Gnostic supermen they have decreed that everything that the racist Europeans thought was evil – sodomy, abortion, blasphemy – are really virtues that must be given state sanction. If you oppose any of those evils, you will be damned, because any opposition to liberalism is racist and racists are damned. So it is written, so it shall be.

The 20th century conservatives failed to put a dent in the liberals’ armor because they caved in to the liberals on the major issue, which was and still is, white pietas. The conservatives talked about defending our democratic traditions, and they wrote solemn tomes about defending our Greco-Roman-Christian heritage, but they never wrote about defending the people from whom we received our sacred heritage. If we do not have the same spirit as the antique Europeans we cannot preserve the civilization they bequeathed to us. That is fine with the liberals, because they believe the people of old Europe and the civilization they created were evil. But what about the conservatives who claim they want to preserve Western civilization while demonizing white pietas? It’s not possible. A man cannot conserve Western values while denouncing the people who created those values. You must either be a racist, a white man who loves his kith and kin, or you must be a liberal. There is no in between. By the 21st century, all conservatives were liberals, because they were afraid to be called racists.

In many ways, all bad, the new definition of sin suits the conservatives. They no longer have to worry about the old European honor code which required men to defend their women against the barbarians of color. That type of honor code died when racism emerged as the unpardonable sin. They no longer have to maintain any of the so-called pillars of society, such as the sanctity of life in the womb or the sanctity of Christian marriage. All things stemming from that charity of honor culture of old Europe can be done away with, allowing the conservatives time to work on what is really important – getting a non-racist white into office who will lower taxes and/or support our troops. But why are the troops “our troops”? Aren’t “our troops” members of the same military that Eisenhower sent to Little Rock, Arkansas to enforce integration at the point of a bayonet? And aren’t “our troops” the same troops that will be used against us should we dare to rise up and purge the black barbarians from our cities?

We are required, in this, the satanic phase of the Europeans’ history, to acquiesce passively to every form of liberal evil because to oppose liberalism is racist. That is quite a convenient formulation of the liberals. If all white people adhere to it, the liberals can reign until they die out from the black plague they created.

The act of kneeling is not intrinsically evil. In fact, to kneel in prayer to the Son of God is a great good. But should we kneel before the liberals and the liberals’ gods? The men who knelt in prayer to Christ, the ‘racist’ Europeans, would not have permitted the Moslem invasion of Europe, the daily rape and murder of whites at the hands of negro savages, the slaughter of the innocents, and the legalization of every form of sexual perversion. They would have felt honor bound to stop all the aforementioned practices. But that is the tragedy of the European people. They have rejected the honor code of old Europe because the antique Europeans were, according to the liberals, racist. If we continue to live without honor, we will surely perish.

It certainly seems rather hopeless for white people. They seem completely cowed by their fear of the racist label. The turning point came when the organized churches, first the Roman Catholic Church, and then the Protestant churches, went over to the worship of a universal idea of God rather than the worship of Christ the Savior. That resulted in the identification of the old European honor code with the ‘unpardonable sin’ code of the liberals.

There is an unbridgeable divide between the “Dream of the Rood” Christianity and modern Christianity. The former celebrates Christ our Savior, Christ our kinsman, while the later celebrates the God of the universal mind. The love of the Christ depicted in the “Dream of the Rood” creates a people who love their own in and through the Savior. A philosophical commitment to a generic, philosophical God creates a tepid, weak ‘love’ for all mankind, which leaves a void in the souls of men that can only be filled by the devil. “See how they love one another,” is the sign of the “Dream of the Rood” Christianity. “See how they hate their own,” is the sign of the liberal Christianity of the satanic, modern day, anti-Christian, Christian churches. There is no love, no honor, no God in those churches. Until the complete rejection of Satan’s new Christless, non-racist Christianity becomes the main thrust of the Europeans’ counterrevolution, there will be no salvation in this world or the next for the white Europeans, because the man who condemns his own in the name of a universal love for a non-existent, abstract people has no soul to call his own. “Breathes there a man with soul so dead…” Yes, the European people who fear the racist label have souls so dead.

We know what would make the European people whole again, but we do not know how that can happen. The European people need to love their own in and through the Savior. So long as they hate the ‘racist’ people who loved much, the European people will be estranged from God. Satan always attacks God through His people. If “the love that once was there” is no longer there, there can be no European restoration no matter who gets elected to political office.

Mark Antony’s speech to the Romans speaks to us as well, not as regards Caesar, but as regards our relationship to Christ:

You all did love him once, not without cause;
What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?

Our people once loved Christ, for what cause do we now regard Him as a lesser god in a pantheon of nature gods? Why do we regard Him as part of an “ecumenical jihad,” as the non-incarnate God of the nation state of Israel or as a special assistant to Nelson Mandela or to the people of the Amazon rain forest? We have relegated Christ to the status of a lesser nature god because there is no room in a man’s heart for the love of the living God if he is full of self-love. An overweening pride of intellect has consumed the European people and made them incapable of loving where they should love, and hating where they should hate. They should love the antique Europeans and the incarnate God with all their heart, mind, and soul. And they should hate the liberals and their god, the fallen archangel Satan, with all their heart, mind and soul.

After a century of indoctrination in school and church, the European people have descended to a state of post-Christian barbarism that makes mere pagan barbarism seem mild in comparison. The liberals can subject those who used to be their own people, before their Gnostic transformation, to torture, rape, and murder without the slightest “compunctious visitings” of conscience. There is no room for charity or mercy in men and women who are surfeit-swelled with self-love. How can anyone with a remnant of grace, the unbought grace of life, not vow to fight the liberals to the knife and drive them off the face of the earth?

St. Paul never talks about the enlightened mind, but he does talk constantly of the circumcised heart. The man who knew the dangers of the scientized intellect spent his life imploring people to open up their hearts to the Savior. Our people, the antique Europeans, did as St. Paul enjoined them. That civilization, the Europe of Christ incarnate, has passed away as a place on the map. But it still exists in the blood of the Europeans who, for the love of Him who died on the cross, have left the ‘pride of intellect’ civilization of the new Europe for the ‘hearth fire’ civilization of the old Europe. We are in the position of Puddleglum in C. S. Lewis’ book, The Silver Chair. Despite the fact that the Witch denies the existence of Narnia and his friends doubt the existence of Narnia, he asserts that there was and is a Narnia. So we must assert that there was and is a Christian Europe where men and women view life from His perspective. And we must defend that world, even if the apostate Europeans outnumber us by a million to one. If we look at life from the standpoint of pure math we are surely doomed. But when did the European hero ever take numbers into account? There is a realm of honor, that charity of honor, that sprang up from the hearts of the European people. That realm is not time bound nor is its reemergence among us dependent on a democratic majority. It depends on hearts that love their own in and through Him. Such things do not happen in a science-based culture, but they do happen when two or three European hearts are gathered together in His name. +